CRIMINAL | PERSONAL INJURY | ESTATE MANAGEMENT | TRUSTS | LIVING WILLS | IMMIGRATION | DIVORCE | BANKRUPTCY | REAL ESTATE | AND MORE

Legal Matters.Practical advice from our area’s attorneys specializing in all types of law.

29377 Rancho California Rd. Suite 103 • Temecula, CA 92591www.attorneymortongrabel.com

Trusted. Proven.LAW OFFICES OF

MORTON J. GRABEL

Over 30 YearsPracticing Law in Temecula

Call today to schedule an appointment!951-695-7700

Se Habla Español

Our Real Estate services include but are not limited to:

• Property Disputes• Title Transfers• Commercial Real Estate• Zoning and Re-Zoning• Sales, Purchases, and

Transfers

Our Personal Injury services include but are not limited to:

• Automobile accidents• Bodily injury claims• Assault and battery• Head injuries• Slip and fall• Hit and run accidents

We will help provide you and your family protection from but not limited to:

• Harassing phone calls from creditors

and debt collectors• Garnishment of wages• Repossessions• Financial distress

Common Elder Abuse offenses include but are not limited to:

• Malnourishment• Errors in administering

medication• Serious infections• Unsanitary conditions• Physical abuse • Falls

Real Estate

Personal Injury

Bankruptcy

Elder Abuse

How careful is careful enough?

Courtesy photo

951-763-5510

Call today to learn about advertising your law firm on this page and the opportunity to submit articles!

VALLEYNEWS

Samantha BerryessaAttorney at Law

Let us advocate for you! WITH OVER 20 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE including six years with the IRS Office of Chief Counsel in DC, we can effectively represent you. Specializing in Tax Controversy including representation in US Tax & US District court, IRS Appeals, Offer in Compromise, Installment Agreements,

Innocent Spouse, Lien/Levy, Trust Fund Penalty Assistance, and FATCA Amnesty Relief.

LAW OFFICE of

IETROANESTRELLI

(951) 319-7674 43533 Ridge Park Dr, Temeculawww.ietaxattorney.com

Owe the IRS, FTB, EDD or CDTFA?

WWW.BERRYESSALAW.COM Samantha@BerryessaLaw.com

Samantha Berryessa Attorney at Law

(760) 723-5513 Fallbrook | (951) 693-0053 Temecula

• Pedestrian Accidents• Car, Truck, Motorycyle, Airplane

Accidents• Premises Liability (dangerous

conditions on property)

WRONGFUL DEATH LAWSUITS& PERSONAL INJURY

• Agricultural Injuries causing death

• Carbon Monoxide Injuries causing death

• Life Altering Personal Injury• Federal Trademark Filing, Searches

Fallbrook’s Friendly Lawyer with Friendly Fees

Senior & Military Discounts405 S. Main, Fallbrook

In Practice 28 YearsFallbrookJim@sbcglobal.net760-728-1960

James C. Alvord Attorney

Wills • Trusts • Estate Planning

If you stop in at Hazel’s Café any morning before the workday begins, the first thing you smell is the wonderful aroma of strong piping hot coffee. Hazel has the best in town. Local plumb-ers, contractors, businesspeople, along with two or three retired good old boys who just like to talk, fill up the long weathered oak table at the back wall that everyone refers to as the BS ta-ble. At one time or another, just about any topic you can think of discussed. And if there happens to be a big lawsuit in the news you can bet it will get more than its share of being argued about with just about everyone being an authority on what the law is or what it should be.

If the lawsuit is about, let’s say a husband, wife and their three young children who are killed or terribly injured in a head on collision by a drunk driver who smashes into them after crossing the centerline, even the most pas-sionate tort reformers at the table find little to object to.

But change up the facts a little bit to where instead of a drunk driver causing the crash, it was someone swatting at a fly that annoyed them, then the volume at the table goes up and the dis-cussion gets increasingly more lively. Or change things around to where the car carrying the family accidentally pulls out of the church parking lot in front of a very drunk driver who is in the correct lane and well within the speed limit. Someone will prob-ably say that even a drunk driver has the right not to be smashed

into if he is in his own lane driving at a safe speed1. Someone else at the table will probably argue that he doesn’t care, a drunk driver should not have the right to get anything.

So what does the law say? The general rule is that all of us have a duty to exercise ordinary care which is just another way of saying that we are supposed to conduct ourselves reasonably under the circumstances. We don’t have to conduct ourselves perfectly, just reasonably. And in a jury trial, what is reasonable under the circumstances is what the jury finds it to be, based on the facts and evidence presented and after following instructions on the law.

So, what happens when Hazel is refilling mugs at the table with her delicious, steaming hot coffee and she accidentally dumps scalding hot coffee in her customer’s lap causing excruciatingly painful third-degree burns to his groin, thighs and buttocks that requires eight days of hospitalization, skin grafts, painful Hubbard immer-sion tankings for debridement,

months of physical therapy and atrocious keloid scarring that is shocking to look at? His wife is the only one who ever sees the scars, or possibly he is the only one who ever sees them, but he knows they are there.

Well, the jurors will be asked to

decide if Hazel was acting unrea-sonably by serving her coffee at 190° F which may cause third-de-

gree burns within three seconds rather than 160° F, which would have given her customer 20 sec-onds to avoid third-degree burns by having more time to remove his clothing. Coffee at 190° F, causes third-degree burns which burns away the skin, down to the

muscle/fatty-tissue layer in two to seven seconds.

Was it unreasonable for Hazel to serve her coffee at 190°F when all other restaurants in town served coffee at temperatures at least 20° less than Hazel? Was is unreasonable for Hazel to be looking back over her shoulder and talking to someone else rather than paying attention when she accidentally dumped the hot cof-fee in her customers lap?

These are the kind of ques-tions that 12 jurors from a wide variety of job descriptions and backgrounds must deliberate around a table in the jury room to decide whether or not Hazel was negligent and how much her liability insurance2 should have to pay to her customer for the harm she caused. They will probably be asked to decide a dollar amount for his pain and suffering as well.

In jury deliberations, the seri-ousness will be greater, and the arguments more heated at times, but when it’s all said and done, in many ways it’s a lot like the morn-ing coffee crowd at Hazel’s café.

Every week, everyday people from all kinds of backgrounds and

walks of life serve on our juries making their viewpoints known, arguing for what they believe is right and what they believe is wrong. This is good to remember whenever we hear about a jury verdict that at first blush appears to be too much money or frivo-lous. It’s everyday jurors like us, everyday people from all walks of life who sit through all the ev-idence presented by the defendant as well as the plaintiff and listened to the judge’s instructions.

Only when they find that a de-fendant failed to act reasonably, will a plaintiff be compensated for his or her harm. And isn’t that what we want for ourselves, oth-ers to treat us reasonably?

1The jury would be instructed on California law which states that in a personal injury lawsuit, a drunk driver who is not at fault in an accident may not recover pain and suffering damages, but may only recover economic damages. This is true unless the at fault driver was also drunk.

2Note: The jury will not be told that Hazel has liability insurance.

“So what does the law say? The general rule is that all of us have a duty to exercise ordinary care which is

just another way of saying we are supposed to conduct ourselves reasonably under the circumstances.”