Upload
maxime
View
39
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
LED BY: Jason Linnell, National Center for Electronics Recycling Jennifer Nash, Product Stewardship Institute. PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR ELECTRONICS RECYCLING PROGRAMS How Can We Measure Effectiveness?. E-SCRAP 2009 • TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22 • 1pm–4pm. ABOUT US. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
LED BY: Jason Linnell, National Center for Electronics
Recycling Jennifer Nash, Product Stewardship Institute
E-SCRAP 2009 • TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22 • 1pm–4pm
PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR ELECTRONICS RECYCLING PROGRAMSHow Can We Measure Effectiveness?
National Center for Electronics Recycling A 501(c)(3) non-profit organization formed in 2005 Dedicated to the development and enhancement of a national infrastructure for the
recycling of used electronics in the U.S. The NCER is ready to assist in the implementation of recycling programs across the
country and believes that national and regional approaches offer the best way forward.
Product Stewardship Institute National non-profit membership-based organization located in Boston,
Massachusetts Works with state and local government agencies to partner with manufacturers,
retailers, environmental groups, federal agencies, and other key stakeholders to reduce the health and environmental impacts of consumer products.
Encourages product design changes and mediating stakeholder dialogues
Current Performance Metrics in State Electronics Recycling Programs Jason Linnell, NCER Types of Metrics in Legislation Results So Far What Are We Missing?
Dialogue on effective performance measures
Develop a plan to incorporate them into data and analysis
Agenda Overview Overview presentations/questions Current metrics for electronics recycling Stakeholder panel Discussion
Percentage of Population Covered by E-waste Law
% Covered, 49.5%
% Not Covered,
50.5%
States With E-Waste Laws
NYC
Rhode Island
States With Producer Responsibility Laws
States With ARF (Consumer Fees) Laws
States With Landfill Disposal Fee
States With Disposal Ban/No E-Waste Law
California is the best program in the nation!
OR….
*Time period Jul 08- Jun 09 ** annualized
California is (barely) the best program in the nation!
BUT…
*Time period Jul 08- Jun 09 ** annualized
Major Differences: Patchwork of Products and Entities!
10 different sets of product lists 8 Sets of “covered entities”
All cover monitors, TVs, laptops + allow households Non-Scientific Deductions to normalize (cumulative)
– 10% desktops – 5% small peripherals/printers/VCRs/DVDs etc And (choose 1):
• – 35% allow all entities (including business)• – 15% allow small businesses, school districts, local governments • – 10% all small business/non-profits only
Minnesota is the best program in the nation!
How Can & ShouldWe Measure
Performance??
Performance Goals OverviewJennifer Nash, PSI
Effective Metrics Types of Performance Metrics Use of Performance Metrics in other
Stewardship Programs
BREAKBREAKBREAKBREAK
Panel Members Garth Hickle, Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency Carole Cifrino, Maine Dept. of
Environmental Protection Mike Watson, Dell Lorraine Kerwood, NextStep Recycling
What Are The Desired Metrics for Electronics Recycling Programs?
What are the best metrics? Other Metrics – What is feasible and what would they
tell us? What are the key challenges in harmonizing
performance metrics? Is it necessary to harmonize all program elements at
once, or can metrics be harmonized as a first step? Plan for follow-up action on performance measures