Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
• lectures accompanying the book: Solid State Physics: An Introduction, by Philip Hofmann (2nd edition 2015, ISBN-10: 3527412824, ISBN-13: 978-3527412822, Wiley-VCH Berlin.
1
www.philiphofmann.net
Superconductivity
The discovery of superconductivity
• Resistance of Mercury at low temperatures (Heike Kamerlingh Onnes in 1911, Nobel price in 1913).• At 4.2 K the resistance drops to an unmeasurably small value.
This seems to be a phase transition with a transition range of around 10-3 K.
What about the low-temperature conductivity of metals?
• Metals should have a finite resistance at low temperatures.
resi
stiv
itty l
(arb
. uni
ts)
l
0
T (arb. units)
0
normal metal
superconductor
0 TC
Periodic table of superconducting elements
Fr Ra Ac Rf
La Hf
Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu
Ag
B C O F Ne
l Xe
Po At
Br Kr
Rn
YbTmErHoDyTbGdEuSmPmNdPr
Np Pu Am Cm Bk Cf Es Fm Md No Lr
S ArCl
N
Pd
Pt Au
Rh
Db Sg Bh Hs Mt Ds Rg Uub
Sc
Sr
Ca
Mg
ZrTi V
MoW
Zn GaAl
Th Pa U
SnCd InHg Tl Pb
RuOs Ir
TcRe
NbTa
BeSiGe As Se
Te
LuCe
P
BiSbY
BaCsRb
K
NaLiH Hesuperconducting under high pressure
superconducting under normal conditions
Is the resistivity of a superconductor really zero or just very small?
• A two-point probe measurement will not work because the the contact resistance and the resistance of the wires dominates everything.• A four point probe measurement can be tried but it does not
work either: one is limited by the smallest voltage one can measure.
V I I
R1 R2 R3 R4
Rsample Rsample Rsample
V
R1 R2
I I
Rsample
Is the resistivity of a superconductor really zero or just very small?
• A super-current can be induced in a ring.• The decay of the current is given by the relaxation time
(10-14 s for a normal metal). For a superconductor it should be infinite. Experiments suggest that it is not less than 100.000 years.
Chapter 9
Superconductivity
BT = Bc
1
T
Tc
2(9.1)
I(t) = I0et/ (9.2)
Eg = 3.53kBTc (9.3)
Vc =Eg
2e(9.4)
Bint = Bextez/ (9.5)
> /
2 (9.6)
Bc2 =
2
Bc (9.7)
B = µ0nI (9.8)
26
I
FB
Destruction by magnetic fields
Fr Ra Ac Rf
La Hf
Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu
Ag
B C O F Ne
l Xe
Po At
Br Kr
Rn
YbTmErHoDyTbGdEuSmPmNdPr
Np Pu Am Cm Bk Cf Es Fm Md No Lr
S ArCl
N
Pd
Pt Au
Rh
Db Sg Bh Hs Mt UunUuuUub Uuq
Sc
Sr
Ca
Mg
Zr
Ti V
Mo
W
Zn Ga
Al
Th Pa U
SnCd In
Hg Tl Pb
Ru
Os Ir
Tc
Re
Nb
Ta
Be
Si
Ge As Se
Te
LuCe
P
Bi
SbY
BaCs
Rb
K
Na
Li
H
Period
1
2
1
1
2
Group
1716151413 18
18
Group
109876543 11 12Group3
4
5
6
7
He
superconducting under high pressuresuperconducting under normal conditions
Figure 11.2: Periodic table of the elements with the superconducting elementsin bold large letters. Light grey letters indicates that the elements do onlybecome superconducting in a high pressure modification.
small? In fact, one does not know this and it is not possible to answer thisquestion from any experiment. One can, however, try to find and upper limitfor the resistivity. The experimental approach to this is to induce a currentin a superconducting loop using a magnetic field. One should then expectthis current to go on forever without any decay. Observing the decay (orrather the lack of it) over a long time (years!) gives the possibility to give anupper limit for the resistivity. Currently, this upper limit is thought to be10−25 Ωm or so.
Apart from the temperature, there are two other important parameterswhich can destroy the superconducting state. These are a magnetic field anda current through the sample. The combined effect of a magnetic field andthe temperature is shown in Fig. 11.3(a). For low temperatures and smallmagnetic fields, in the area below the curve, the solid is in its supercon-ducting state. For too high a magnetic field or too high a temperature, thesuperconductivity is lost and the solid is in the area above the curve. Fora given temperature T < TC we can assign a critical magnetic field B0C(T )which turns out to be
B0C(T ) = B0C(0)
!
1 −"
T
TC
#2$
.
178
normal
superconducting ext
erna
l fie
ld B
0
temperature T TC
BC(0)
00
BC(T)
Destruction by magnetic fields / current density
TT
j
C
jC(B0,T)
B0
BC(0)
Example: medical MRI scanner
The Meissner effect
• Superconductors (type I) are perfect diamagnets (with χm=-1) which always expel the external field.
• This so-called Meissner effect goes beyond mere perfect conductivity.
The Meissner effect
The Meissner effect perfect conductor
T>TC
B=0 B=Ba
The Meissner effect perfect conductor
T>TC
B=0 B=Ba
A
IEdl = dB
dt
The Meissner effect perfect conductor
T>TC
B=0 B=Ba
cool below TC
B=BaB Ba
A
IEdl = dB
dt
The Meissner effect perfect conductor
T>TC
B=0 B=Ba
cool below TC
B=BaB Ba
B 0 B 0
A
IEdl = dB
dt
The Meissner effect
• For a perfect conductor, the magnetic field inside the conductor cannot change. An enclosed field is possible.
perfect conductor
T>TC
B=0 B=Ba
cool below TC
B=BaB Ba
B 0 B 0
A
IEdl = dB
dt
The Meissner effect movement without friction
perfect conductor
T>TC
B=0 B=Ba
cool below TC
B=BaB Ba
B 0 B 0
m@v
@t= qE
@j
@t=
nsq2
mE
The Meissner effect movement without friction
perfect conductor
T>TC
B=0 B=Ba
cool below TC
B=BaB Ba
B 0 B 0
m@v
@t= qE
with Maxwell equation
curlE = @B
@t@
@t
m
nsq2curlj+B
= 0
@j
@t=
nsq2
mE
The Meissner effect movement without friction
perfect conductor
T>TC
B=0 B=Ba
cool below TC
B=BaB Ba
B 0 B 0
A
@
@t
Zm
nsq2curljdA+
ZBdA
=
@
@t
Im
nsq2jdl +
ZBdA
= 0.
m@v
@t= qE
with Maxwell equation
curlE = @B
@t@
@t
m
nsq2curlj+B
= 0
@j
@t=
nsq2
mE
The Meissner effect movement without friction
perfect conductor
T>TC
B=0 B=Ba
cool below TC
B=BaB Ba
B 0 B 0
mag. flux by j mag. flux by ext. fieldA
@
@t
Zm
nsq2curljdA+
ZBdA
=
@
@t
Im
nsq2jdl +
ZBdA
= 0.
m@v
@t= qE
with Maxwell equation
curlE = @B
@t@
@t
m
nsq2curlj+B
= 0
@j
@t=
nsq2
mE
The Meissner effect
• The essence of the Meissner effect is that the superconductor ALWAYS EXPELS THE MAGNETIC FIELD (ideal diamagnet).
perfect conductor superconductor
T>TC T>TC
B=0
B=0
B=Ba
B=Ba
B=Ba
cool below TC
B=BaB Ba B Ba
B 0 B 0 B 0 B 0
cool below TC
Why levitation?
• The levitation stems from the same reason as ordinary diamagnetic levitation: a combination of gravitational force and a magnetic force due to the inhomogeneous field.
• The only difference is the different strength because of the much higher (negative) susceptibility.
Isotope effect
• Changing the isotope of a material should have a very minor influence on the electronic states.• The isotope effect suggests that the lattice vibrations are
involved in the superconductivity.
remember: energy for an harmonic oscillator
with the frequency1
ω =
!
γ
M.
The total energy for one harmonic oscillator is
E =1
2Mv2
x +1
2γx2.
Assuming classical motion, we can estimate the amplitude of the vibrationby using the equipartition theorem of statistical mechanics. This theoremstates that every generalised momentum or position coordinate which ap-pears squared in the Hamilton function (or in the total energy in our case),should contribute with a mean energy kBT/2 to the system. Here we havetwo squared coordinates and therefore the the mean energy of such an oscil-lator in contact with a heat bath is kBT . At the highest displacement theoscillator has only potential energy and so
1
2γx2
max = kBT
and thus
xmax =
"
2kBT
γ
#1/2
(5.2)
This is usually a few percent of the lattice spacing.
5.1.2 An Infinite Chain of Atoms
A more realistic model for crystal vibrations is a chain of atoms. If werestrict ourselves to longitudinal vibrations in this chain, the model is onlyone dimensional. However, we can learn a lot about vibrations in threedimensional solids already from this. We start with infinite chains of oneand two different atoms per unit cell before passing on to chains of finitelength.
One Atom Per Unit Cell
An atomic chain with one atom per unit cell is shown in Fig. 5.1. From aformal point of view, this is a one dimensional atomic lattice with one atomper unit cell and a lattice vector of length a. This means that the reciprocallattice is also one-dimensional and the reciprocal lattice vector has a length
1For simplicity, we will often speak merely of ’frequency’ when ’angular frequency’would be the correct term.
44
2.05 2.10
0.565
0.575
0.585
~M-1/2
Sn
log (M / 1 amu)
log
(TC
/ 1K)
London equations (1935)
zero resistance 1. London equation@j
@t=
nsq2
msE
London equations (1935)
zero resistance 1. London equation
mag. flux by j mag. flux by ext. field
@
@t
ms
nsq2curlj+B
= 0
@
@t
Zms
nsq2curljdA+
ZBdA
=
@
@t
Ims
nsq2jdl +
ZBdA
= 0
@j
@t=
nsq2
msE
London equations (1935)
zero resistance 1. London equation
mag. flux by j mag. flux by ext. field
@
@t
ms
nsq2curlj+B
= 0
@
@t
Zms
nsq2curljdA+
ZBdA
=
@
@t
Ims
nsq2jdl +
ZBdA
= 0
2. London equationMeissner effect ms
nsq2curlj+B = 0
@j
@t=
nsq2
msE
London equations (1935)
zero resistance 1. London equation
mag. flux by j mag. flux by ext. field
@
@t
ms
nsq2curlj+B
= 0
@
@t
Zms
nsq2curljdA+
ZBdA
=
@
@t
Ims
nsq2jdl +
ZBdA
= 0
2. London equationMeissner effect ms
nsq2curlj+B = 0
Ims
nsq2jdl +
ZBdA = 0
@j
@t=
nsq2
msE
Field penetration
now we have and the Maxwell equation(inside the superconductor)
Chapter 9
Superconductivity
F = jB (9.1)
U = iR =
(9.2)
mvt
= eE (9.3)
jt
=nse2
mE (9.4)
curlE = Bt
(9.5)
t
m
nse2curlj + B
= 0 (9.6)
t
m
nse2curlj + B
= 0 (9.7)
m
nse2curlj + B = 0 (9.8)
L =m
nse2(9.9)
curlj = 1L
B (9.10)
curlB = µ0j (9.11)
curlcurlB = µ0curlj = µ0
LB (9.12)
graddivBB = B = µ0
LB (9.13)
B µ0
LB = 0 (9.14)
E = iR =
Edl = dB
dt;
curlEdA =
BdA; curlE = B (9.15)
27
ms
nsq2curlj+B = 0
Field penetration
now we have and the Maxwell equation(inside the superconductor)
Chapter 9
Superconductivity
F = jB (9.1)
U = iR =
(9.2)
mvt
= eE (9.3)
jt
=nse2
mE (9.4)
curlE = Bt
(9.5)
t
m
nse2curlj + B
= 0 (9.6)
t
m
nse2curlj + B
= 0 (9.7)
m
nse2curlj + B = 0 (9.8)
L =m
nse2(9.9)
curlj = 1L
B (9.10)
curlB = µ0j (9.11)
curlcurlB = µ0curlj = µ0
LB (9.12)
graddivBB = B = µ0
LB (9.13)
B µ0
LB = 0 (9.14)
E = iR =
Edl = dB
dt;
curlEdA =
BdA; curlE = B (9.15)
27
ms
nsq2curlj+B = 0
combining this gives
curlcurlB = µ0curlj = µ0nsq2
mB
Field penetration
now we have and the Maxwell equation(inside the superconductor)
Chapter 9
Superconductivity
F = jB (9.1)
U = iR =
(9.2)
mvt
= eE (9.3)
jt
=nse2
mE (9.4)
curlE = Bt
(9.5)
t
m
nse2curlj + B
= 0 (9.6)
t
m
nse2curlj + B
= 0 (9.7)
m
nse2curlj + B = 0 (9.8)
L =m
nse2(9.9)
curlj = 1L
B (9.10)
curlB = µ0j (9.11)
curlcurlB = µ0curlj = µ0
LB (9.12)
graddivBB = B = µ0
LB (9.13)
B µ0
LB = 0 (9.14)
E = iR =
Edl = dB
dt;
curlEdA =
BdA; curlE = B (9.15)
27
ms
nsq2curlj+B = 0
combining this gives
curlcurlB = µ0curlj = µ0nsq2
mB
Field penetration
now we have and the Maxwell equation(inside the superconductor)
Chapter 9
Superconductivity
F = jB (9.1)
U = iR =
(9.2)
mvt
= eE (9.3)
jt
=nse2
mE (9.4)
curlE = Bt
(9.5)
t
m
nse2curlj + B
= 0 (9.6)
t
m
nse2curlj + B
= 0 (9.7)
m
nse2curlj + B = 0 (9.8)
L =m
nse2(9.9)
curlj = 1L
B (9.10)
curlB = µ0j (9.11)
curlcurlB = µ0curlj = µ0
LB (9.12)
graddivBB = B = µ0
LB (9.13)
B µ0
LB = 0 (9.14)
E = iR =
Edl = dB
dt;
curlEdA =
BdA; curlE = B (9.15)
27
ms
nsq2curlj+B = 0
combining this gives
curlcurlB = µ0curlj = µ0nsq2
mB
curlcurlB = graddivBB = µ0nsq2
mB
Field penetration
now we have and the Maxwell equation(inside the superconductor)
Chapter 9
Superconductivity
F = jB (9.1)
U = iR =
(9.2)
mvt
= eE (9.3)
jt
=nse2
mE (9.4)
curlE = Bt
(9.5)
t
m
nse2curlj + B
= 0 (9.6)
t
m
nse2curlj + B
= 0 (9.7)
m
nse2curlj + B = 0 (9.8)
L =m
nse2(9.9)
curlj = 1L
B (9.10)
curlB = µ0j (9.11)
curlcurlB = µ0curlj = µ0
LB (9.12)
graddivBB = B = µ0
LB (9.13)
B µ0
LB = 0 (9.14)
E = iR =
Edl = dB
dt;
curlEdA =
BdA; curlE = B (9.15)
27
ms
nsq2curlj+B = 0
combining this gives
curlcurlB = µ0curlj = µ0nsq2
mB
curlcurlB = graddivBB = µ0nsq2
mB
B =µ0nsq2
mB
Field penetration
now we have and the Maxwell equation(inside the superconductor)
Chapter 9
Superconductivity
F = jB (9.1)
U = iR =
(9.2)
mvt
= eE (9.3)
jt
=nse2
mE (9.4)
curlE = Bt
(9.5)
t
m
nse2curlj + B
= 0 (9.6)
t
m
nse2curlj + B
= 0 (9.7)
m
nse2curlj + B = 0 (9.8)
L =m
nse2(9.9)
curlj = 1L
B (9.10)
curlB = µ0j (9.11)
curlcurlB = µ0curlj = µ0
LB (9.12)
graddivBB = B = µ0
LB (9.13)
B µ0
LB = 0 (9.14)
E = iR =
Edl = dB
dt;
curlEdA =
BdA; curlE = B (9.15)
27
This permits only an exponentially damped B field in the superconductor (exercise)
ms
nsq2curlj+B = 0
combining this gives
curlcurlB = µ0curlj = µ0nsq2
mB
curlcurlB = graddivBB = µ0nsq2
mB
B =µ0nsq2
mB
Field penetration
The decay length is in the order of 1000 Å.
superconductorB0
λL
4B =µ0nsq2
mB
4j =µ0nsq2
mj
L =pm/µ0nsq2
Ginzburg-Landau theory (1950)
1
ns = |Ψ∗Ψ| = Ψ
2
0
1
order parameter
coherence length ξ(length over which
can change appreciably)
superconductorHext
λL
Figure 11.6: Exponential damping of an external magnetic field near thesurface of a superconductor.
so-called order parameter Ψ(r) which can be derived from an equation similarto the Schrodinger equation and which has a form which is very reminiscentof a free electron wave
Ψ(r) = Ψ0eiφ(r), (11.4)
in which φ(r) is a macroscopically changing phase and |Ψ∗Ψ| = Ψ20 is equal
to the density of superconducting carriers ns. From the spacial characterof Ψ(r) it emerges that ns cannot change instantaneously, for example fromzero to a high value at the surface of a superconductor. Appreciable changesof Ψ(r) and thereby ns have to happen over a length scale ξ, the so-calledcoherence length of the superconductor.
11.4.2 Microscopic BCS Theory
The microscopic theory of superconductivity was formulated in 1957 by J.Bardeen, L. N. Cooper and J. R. Schrieffer. It is commonly referred to asBCS theory, following the names of its inventors. As pointed out in theintroduction, a full appreciation of the theory is only possible using methodsfrom quantum field theory. Here we will restrict ourselves merely to the verybasic ideas and not go into any detail.
Even before the theory was formulated, some basic requirements wereclear. Any theory should of course be able to explain the vanishing resistivityand the Meissner effect. It should probably involve lattice vibrations in someway in order to account for the isotope effect. Finally, it should not bespecific to any particular material since we have seen that superconductivityis a wide spread phenomenon.
185
(r) = 0(r)ei(r)
Key-ideas of the BCS theory of 1957(Bardeen, Cooper, Schrieffer)
• The interaction of the electrons with lattice vibrations (phonons) must be important (isotope effect, high transition temperature for some metals which are poor conductors at room temperature).
• The electronic ground state of a metal at 0 K is unstable if one permits a net attractive interaction between the electrons, no matter how small.
• The electron-phonon interaction leads to a new ground state of Bosonic electron pairs (Cooper pairs) which shows all the desired properties.
The electron-phonon interaction/ Cooper pairs
• Polarization of the lattice by one electron leads to an attractive potential for another electron.
The electron-phonon interaction / Cooper pairs
• Polarization of the lattice by one electron leads to an attractive potential for another electron.
k
The electron-phonon interaction / Cooper pairs
• Polarization of the lattice by one electron leads to an attractive potential for another electron.
k k'
The electron-phonon interaction/ Cooper pairs
• Polarization of the lattice by one electron leads to an attractive potential for another electron.
k k'
What is the “distance” between the electrons forming Cooper pairs?
The lattice atoms move much slowerthan the electrons. The polarization isretarded
Establishing the polarization takes
the electrons move with
so distance between theelectrons forming the Cooperpair is around
Chapter 9
Superconductivity
F = jB (9.1)
U = iR =
(9.2)
me v t
= eE (9.3)
j t
=ne2
meE (9.4)
rotE = dBdt
(9.5)
t
me
ne2rotj + B
= 0 (9.6)
E = iR =
Edl = dB
dt;
rotEdA =
BdA; rotE = B (9.7)
BT = Bc
1
T
Tc
2(9.8)
I(t) = I0et/ (9.9)
Eg = 3.53kBTc (9.10)
Vc =Eg
2e(9.11)
Bint = Bextez/ (9.12)
> /
2 (9.13)
Bc2 =
2
Bc (9.14)
B = µ0nI (9.15)2D
= 1013s (9.16)
vF = 106ms1 (9.17)
107m (9.18)
27
BT = Bc
1
T
Tc
2(9.16)
I(t) = I0et/ (9.17)
Eg = 3.53kBTc (9.18)
Vc =Eg
2e(9.19)
Bint = Bextez/ (9.20)
> /
2 (9.21)
Bc2 =
2
Bc (9.22)
B = µ0nI (9.23)2
D 1013s (9.24)
vF 106ms1 (9.25)107m (9.26)
TC = 1.13D exp1
g(EF )V(9.27)
coherence and flux quantization
E(r)E(r)/4 = n(r)h (9.28)
E(r) =
4h
nei(r) (9.29)
E(r) =
4h
nei(r) (9.30)(r) =
nei(r) (9.31)
(r) =
nei(r) (9.32)
pds = rh (9.33)
p = mv + qA (9.34)j = nqv (9.35)
p =m
nqj + qA (9.36)
rh =m
nq
jds + q
Ads (9.37)
rh
q=
m
nq2
jds +
Bdf (9.38)
rh
q=
Bdf (9.39)
h
2e(9.40)
m
nq2
jds +
Bdf =
m
nq2
curljdf +
Bdf (9.41)
m
nq2curlj + B = 0 (9.42)
28
BT = Bc
1
T
Tc
2(9.16)
I(t) = I0et/ (9.17)
Eg = 3.53kBTc (9.18)
Vc =Eg
2e(9.19)
Bint = Bextez/ (9.20)
> /
2 (9.21)
Bc2 =
2
Bc (9.22)
B = µ0nI (9.23)2
D 1013s (9.24)
vF 106ms1 (9.25)107m (9.26)
TC = 1.13D exp1
g(EF )V(9.27)
coherence and flux quantization
E(r)E(r)/4 = n(r)h (9.28)
E(r) =
4h
nei(r) (9.29)
E(r) =
4h
nei(r) (9.30)(r) =
nei(r) (9.31)
(r) =
nei(r) (9.32)
pds = rh (9.33)
p = mv + qA (9.34)j = nqv (9.35)
p =m
nqj + qA (9.36)
rh =m
nq
jds + q
Ads (9.37)
rh
q=
m
nq2
jds +
Bdf (9.38)
rh
q=
Bdf (9.39)
h
2e(9.40)
m
nq2
jds +
Bdf =
m
nq2
curljdf +
Bdf (9.41)
m
nq2curlj + B = 0 (9.42)
28
k
Coherence of the superconducting state• The electrons paired in this way are called Cooper pairs. They
have opposite k vectors (a total k=0) and (in most cases) opposite spins, such that S=0.
• Cooper pairs behave like Bosons and can condense all in a single ground state with a macroscopic wave function. This leads to an energy gain with a size depending on how many Cooper pairs already are in the ground state.
• Cooper pairs are example of “quasiparticles” appearing in solids (like holes or electrons with an effective mass or phonons)
k k'
Ginzburg-Landau theory (1950)
1
ns = |Ψ∗Ψ| = Ψ
2
0
1
order parameter
coherence length ξ(length over which
can change appreciably)
superconductorHext
λL
Figure 11.6: Exponential damping of an external magnetic field near thesurface of a superconductor.
so-called order parameter Ψ(r) which can be derived from an equation similarto the Schrodinger equation and which has a form which is very reminiscentof a free electron wave
Ψ(r) = Ψ0eiφ(r), (11.4)
in which φ(r) is a macroscopically changing phase and |Ψ∗Ψ| = Ψ20 is equal
to the density of superconducting carriers ns. From the spacial characterof Ψ(r) it emerges that ns cannot change instantaneously, for example fromzero to a high value at the surface of a superconductor. Appreciable changesof Ψ(r) and thereby ns have to happen over a length scale ξ, the so-calledcoherence length of the superconductor.
11.4.2 Microscopic BCS Theory
The microscopic theory of superconductivity was formulated in 1957 by J.Bardeen, L. N. Cooper and J. R. Schrieffer. It is commonly referred to asBCS theory, following the names of its inventors. As pointed out in theintroduction, a full appreciation of the theory is only possible using methodsfrom quantum field theory. Here we will restrict ourselves merely to the verybasic ideas and not go into any detail.
Even before the theory was formulated, some basic requirements wereclear. Any theory should of course be able to explain the vanishing resistivityand the Meissner effect. It should probably involve lattice vibrations in someway in order to account for the isotope effect. Finally, it should not bespecific to any particular material since we have seen that superconductivityis a wide spread phenomenon.
185
(r) = 0(r)ei(r)
The BCS ground state
occupied single electron states en
ergy
(ar
b. u
nits
)
excited unpaired electrons
normal metal
unoccupied single electron states
EF
The BCS ground state
occupied single electron states en
ergy
(ar
b. u
nits
)
excited unpaired electrons
normal metal
unoccupied single electron states
EFAs the Cooper pairs are formed due to the electron-phonon interaction,
one can expect the size of the gap to be in the order of a typical phononenergy hωD. This is indeed the case. Typically the gap size is given inrelation to the critical temperature TC. BCS theory predicts the gap atzero temperature to be ∆ = 3.53kBTC which amounts to just a few meVfor most superconductors. TC, in turn, can be predicted from the Debyetemperature, the electronic density of states at the Fermi level and V , aparameter measuring the electron-phonon coupling strength. The BCS resultfor the transition temperature, which is not derived here, is
TC = 1.13ΘD exp−1
g(EF )V. (11.5)
This equation tells us a lot about BCS type superconductivity. First ofall, the transition temperature is proportional to the Debye temperature.This readily explains the isotope effect since ΘD ∝ ωD ∝ M−1/2. It alsoshows that the Debye temperature basically sets the temperature scale ofthe phenomenon. The exponential cannot become larger than one so thatone cannot hope to get a transition temperature higher than 1.13ΘD. Inreality, the exponential is much smaller than one. Both the density of statesand the interaction strength enter the expression in the same way, meaningthat both increase the critical temperature.
To make matters even more complicated, the energy gain 2∆ for theformation of one Cooper pair depends on the number of Cooper pairs alreadythere, so that also the size of the gap in the excitation spectrum depends onthis number. As the temperature is raised, the number of Cooper pairsdecreases until it reaches zero at TC. Therefore also the gap size decreases.The gap size as a function of temperature is given in Fig. 11.9.
The existence of Cooper pairs and the gap in the excitation spectrum canbe used to explain all observed phenomena discussed above. Here we merelydiscuss the resistance free transport and the existence of a critical currentdensity and a critical magnetic field. We do not show how the Meissner effectcan be explain but the basic idea is that an equation similar to the secondLondon equation (11.2) can be derived in the BCS model.
In order to explain the resistance free flow of current, it is useful to lookback at Fig. 7.13 and (7.21), (7.22) describing the conduction of normalelectrons in the quantum picture. The basic idea of the process was thatthe external electric field merely shifts the distribution of the electrons in kspace. For bands crossing the Fermi level this would lead to an increasinglyskewed distribution, i.e. to an increasing current density j. This processis limited by the fact that the electrons are scattered by lattice vibrations,defects and impurities.
189
superconductor at T=0
occupied single electron stats
unoccupied single electron states
occupied single electron states
2Δ
Hydrogen molecule
54321interatomic distance (a0)
∆E
∆E
bonding
anti-bonding
The BCS ground state
As the Cooper pairs are formed due to the electron-phonon interaction,one can expect the size of the gap to be in the order of a typical phononenergy hωD. This is indeed the case. Typically the gap size is given inrelation to the critical temperature TC. BCS theory predicts the gap atzero temperature to be ∆ = 3.53kBTC which amounts to just a few meVfor most superconductors. TC, in turn, can be predicted from the Debyetemperature, the electronic density of states at the Fermi level and V , aparameter measuring the electron-phonon coupling strength. The BCS resultfor the transition temperature, which is not derived here, is
TC = 1.13ΘD exp−1
g(EF )V. (11.5)
This equation tells us a lot about BCS type superconductivity. First ofall, the transition temperature is proportional to the Debye temperature.This readily explains the isotope effect since ΘD ∝ ωD ∝ M−1/2. It alsoshows that the Debye temperature basically sets the temperature scale ofthe phenomenon. The exponential cannot become larger than one so thatone cannot hope to get a transition temperature higher than 1.13ΘD. Inreality, the exponential is much smaller than one. Both the density of statesand the interaction strength enter the expression in the same way, meaningthat both increase the critical temperature.
To make matters even more complicated, the energy gain 2∆ for theformation of one Cooper pair depends on the number of Cooper pairs alreadythere, so that also the size of the gap in the excitation spectrum depends onthis number. As the temperature is raised, the number of Cooper pairsdecreases until it reaches zero at TC. Therefore also the gap size decreases.The gap size as a function of temperature is given in Fig. 11.9.
The existence of Cooper pairs and the gap in the excitation spectrum canbe used to explain all observed phenomena discussed above. Here we merelydiscuss the resistance free transport and the existence of a critical currentdensity and a critical magnetic field. We do not show how the Meissner effectcan be explain but the basic idea is that an equation similar to the secondLondon equation (11.2) can be derived in the BCS model.
In order to explain the resistance free flow of current, it is useful to lookback at Fig. 7.13 and (7.21), (7.22) describing the conduction of normalelectrons in the quantum picture. The basic idea of the process was thatthe external electric field merely shifts the distribution of the electrons in kspace. For bands crossing the Fermi level this would lead to an increasinglyskewed distribution, i.e. to an increasing current density j. This processis limited by the fact that the electrons are scattered by lattice vibrations,defects and impurities.
189
occupied single electron states en
ergy
(ar
b. u
nits
)
excited unpaired electrons
normal metal superconductor at T=0
unoccupied single electron states
EF
occupied single electron stats
unoccupied single electron states
occupied single electron states
26
The BCS ground state
transition temperature
densityof states
Debye temp.
el-phinteractionstrength
Chapter 9
Superconductivity
F = jB (9.1)
U = iR =
(9.2)
me v t
= eE (9.3)
j t
=ne2
meE (9.4)
rotE = dBdt
(9.5)
t
me
ne2rotj + B
= 0 (9.6)
E = iR =
Edl = dB
dt;
rotEdA =
BdA; rotE = B (9.7)
BT = Bc
1
T
Tc
2(9.8)
I(t) = I0et/ (9.9)
Eg = 3.53kBTc (9.10)
Vc =Eg
2e(9.11)
Bint = Bextez/ (9.12)
> /
2 (9.13)
Bc2 =
2
Bc (9.14)
B = µ0nI (9.15)2D
= 1013s (9.16)
vF = 106ms1 (9.17)107m (9.18)
TC = 1.13D exp1
g(EF )V(9.19)
27
The BCS ground state
transition temperature
As the Cooper pairs are formed due to the electron-phonon interaction,one can expect the size of the gap to be in the order of a typical phononenergy hωD. This is indeed the case. Typically the gap size is given inrelation to the critical temperature TC. BCS theory predicts the gap atzero temperature to be ∆ = 3.53kBTC which amounts to just a few meVfor most superconductors. TC, in turn, can be predicted from the Debyetemperature, the electronic density of states at the Fermi level and V , aparameter measuring the electron-phonon coupling strength. The BCS resultfor the transition temperature, which is not derived here, is
TC = 1.13ΘD exp−1
g(EF )V. (11.5)
This equation tells us a lot about BCS type superconductivity. First ofall, the transition temperature is proportional to the Debye temperature.This readily explains the isotope effect since ΘD ∝ ωD ∝ M−1/2. It alsoshows that the Debye temperature basically sets the temperature scale ofthe phenomenon. The exponential cannot become larger than one so thatone cannot hope to get a transition temperature higher than 1.13ΘD. Inreality, the exponential is much smaller than one. Both the density of statesand the interaction strength enter the expression in the same way, meaningthat both increase the critical temperature.
To make matters even more complicated, the energy gain 2∆ for theformation of one Cooper pair depends on the number of Cooper pairs alreadythere, so that also the size of the gap in the excitation spectrum depends onthis number. As the temperature is raised, the number of Cooper pairsdecreases until it reaches zero at TC. Therefore also the gap size decreases.The gap size as a function of temperature is given in Fig. 11.9.
The existence of Cooper pairs and the gap in the excitation spectrum canbe used to explain all observed phenomena discussed above. Here we merelydiscuss the resistance free transport and the existence of a critical currentdensity and a critical magnetic field. We do not show how the Meissner effectcan be explain but the basic idea is that an equation similar to the secondLondon equation (11.2) can be derived in the BCS model.
In order to explain the resistance free flow of current, it is useful to lookback at Fig. 7.13 and (7.21), (7.22) describing the conduction of normalelectrons in the quantum picture. The basic idea of the process was thatthe external electric field merely shifts the distribution of the electrons in kspace. For bands crossing the Fermi level this would lead to an increasinglyskewed distribution, i.e. to an increasing current density j. This processis limited by the fact that the electrons are scattered by lattice vibrations,defects and impurities.
189
isotope effect
densityof states
Debye temp.
el-phinteractionstrength
Chapter 9
Superconductivity
F = jB (9.1)
U = iR =
(9.2)
me v t
= eE (9.3)
j t
=ne2
meE (9.4)
rotE = dBdt
(9.5)
t
me
ne2rotj + B
= 0 (9.6)
E = iR =
Edl = dB
dt;
rotEdA =
BdA; rotE = B (9.7)
BT = Bc
1
T
Tc
2(9.8)
I(t) = I0et/ (9.9)
Eg = 3.53kBTc (9.10)
Vc =Eg
2e(9.11)
Bint = Bextez/ (9.12)
> /
2 (9.13)
Bc2 =
2
Bc (9.14)
B = µ0nI (9.15)2D
= 1013s (9.16)
vF = 106ms1 (9.17)107m (9.18)
TC = 1.13D exp1
g(EF )V(9.19)
27
The BCS ground state
transition temperature
As the Cooper pairs are formed due to the electron-phonon interaction,one can expect the size of the gap to be in the order of a typical phononenergy hωD. This is indeed the case. Typically the gap size is given inrelation to the critical temperature TC. BCS theory predicts the gap atzero temperature to be ∆ = 3.53kBTC which amounts to just a few meVfor most superconductors. TC, in turn, can be predicted from the Debyetemperature, the electronic density of states at the Fermi level and V , aparameter measuring the electron-phonon coupling strength. The BCS resultfor the transition temperature, which is not derived here, is
TC = 1.13ΘD exp−1
g(EF )V. (11.5)
This equation tells us a lot about BCS type superconductivity. First ofall, the transition temperature is proportional to the Debye temperature.This readily explains the isotope effect since ΘD ∝ ωD ∝ M−1/2. It alsoshows that the Debye temperature basically sets the temperature scale ofthe phenomenon. The exponential cannot become larger than one so thatone cannot hope to get a transition temperature higher than 1.13ΘD. Inreality, the exponential is much smaller than one. Both the density of statesand the interaction strength enter the expression in the same way, meaningthat both increase the critical temperature.
To make matters even more complicated, the energy gain 2∆ for theformation of one Cooper pair depends on the number of Cooper pairs alreadythere, so that also the size of the gap in the excitation spectrum depends onthis number. As the temperature is raised, the number of Cooper pairsdecreases until it reaches zero at TC. Therefore also the gap size decreases.The gap size as a function of temperature is given in Fig. 11.9.
The existence of Cooper pairs and the gap in the excitation spectrum canbe used to explain all observed phenomena discussed above. Here we merelydiscuss the resistance free transport and the existence of a critical currentdensity and a critical magnetic field. We do not show how the Meissner effectcan be explain but the basic idea is that an equation similar to the secondLondon equation (11.2) can be derived in the BCS model.
In order to explain the resistance free flow of current, it is useful to lookback at Fig. 7.13 and (7.21), (7.22) describing the conduction of normalelectrons in the quantum picture. The basic idea of the process was thatthe external electric field merely shifts the distribution of the electrons in kspace. For bands crossing the Fermi level this would lead to an increasinglyskewed distribution, i.e. to an increasing current density j. This processis limited by the fact that the electrons are scattered by lattice vibrations,defects and impurities.
189
isotope effect
densityof states
Debye temp.
el-phinteractionstrength
Chapter 9
Superconductivity
F = jB (9.1)
U = iR =
(9.2)
me v t
= eE (9.3)
j t
=ne2
meE (9.4)
rotE = dBdt
(9.5)
t
me
ne2rotj + B
= 0 (9.6)
E = iR =
Edl = dB
dt;
rotEdA =
BdA; rotE = B (9.7)
BT = Bc
1
T
Tc
2(9.8)
I(t) = I0et/ (9.9)
Eg = 3.53kBTc (9.10)
Vc =Eg
2e(9.11)
Bint = Bextez/ (9.12)
> /
2 (9.13)
Bc2 =
2
Bc (9.14)
B = µ0nI (9.15)2D
= 1013s (9.16)
vF = 106ms1 (9.17)107m (9.18)
TC = 1.13D exp1
g(EF )V(9.19)
27
number of electronsin Cooper pairs g(EF ) g(EF )D
superconductor at T=0
occupied single electron stats
unoccupied single electron states
occupied single electron states
2Δ
As the Cooper pairs are formed due to the electron-phonon interaction,one can expect the size of the gap to be in the order of a typical phononenergy hωD. This is indeed the case. Typically the gap size is given inrelation to the critical temperature TC. BCS theory predicts the gap atzero temperature to be ∆ = 3.53kBTC which amounts to just a few meVfor most superconductors. TC, in turn, can be predicted from the Debyetemperature, the electronic density of states at the Fermi level and V , aparameter measuring the electron-phonon coupling strength. The BCS resultfor the transition temperature, which is not derived here, is
TC = 1.13ΘD exp−1
g(EF )V. (11.5)
This equation tells us a lot about BCS type superconductivity. First ofall, the transition temperature is proportional to the Debye temperature.This readily explains the isotope effect since ΘD ∝ ωD ∝ M−1/2. It alsoshows that the Debye temperature basically sets the temperature scale ofthe phenomenon. The exponential cannot become larger than one so thatone cannot hope to get a transition temperature higher than 1.13ΘD. Inreality, the exponential is much smaller than one. Both the density of statesand the interaction strength enter the expression in the same way, meaningthat both increase the critical temperature.
To make matters even more complicated, the energy gain 2∆ for theformation of one Cooper pair depends on the number of Cooper pairs alreadythere, so that also the size of the gap in the excitation spectrum depends onthis number. As the temperature is raised, the number of Cooper pairsdecreases until it reaches zero at TC. Therefore also the gap size decreases.The gap size as a function of temperature is given in Fig. 11.9.
The existence of Cooper pairs and the gap in the excitation spectrum canbe used to explain all observed phenomena discussed above. Here we merelydiscuss the resistance free transport and the existence of a critical currentdensity and a critical magnetic field. We do not show how the Meissner effectcan be explain but the basic idea is that an equation similar to the secondLondon equation (11.2) can be derived in the BCS model.
In order to explain the resistance free flow of current, it is useful to lookback at Fig. 7.13 and (7.21), (7.22) describing the conduction of normalelectrons in the quantum picture. The basic idea of the process was thatthe external electric field merely shifts the distribution of the electrons in kspace. For bands crossing the Fermi level this would lead to an increasinglyskewed distribution, i.e. to an increasing current density j. This processis limited by the fact that the electrons are scattered by lattice vibrations,defects and impurities.
189
The BCS ground state
transition temperature
As the Cooper pairs are formed due to the electron-phonon interaction,one can expect the size of the gap to be in the order of a typical phononenergy hωD. This is indeed the case. Typically the gap size is given inrelation to the critical temperature TC. BCS theory predicts the gap atzero temperature to be ∆ = 3.53kBTC which amounts to just a few meVfor most superconductors. TC, in turn, can be predicted from the Debyetemperature, the electronic density of states at the Fermi level and V , aparameter measuring the electron-phonon coupling strength. The BCS resultfor the transition temperature, which is not derived here, is
TC = 1.13ΘD exp−1
g(EF )V. (11.5)
This equation tells us a lot about BCS type superconductivity. First ofall, the transition temperature is proportional to the Debye temperature.This readily explains the isotope effect since ΘD ∝ ωD ∝ M−1/2. It alsoshows that the Debye temperature basically sets the temperature scale ofthe phenomenon. The exponential cannot become larger than one so thatone cannot hope to get a transition temperature higher than 1.13ΘD. Inreality, the exponential is much smaller than one. Both the density of statesand the interaction strength enter the expression in the same way, meaningthat both increase the critical temperature.
To make matters even more complicated, the energy gain 2∆ for theformation of one Cooper pair depends on the number of Cooper pairs alreadythere, so that also the size of the gap in the excitation spectrum depends onthis number. As the temperature is raised, the number of Cooper pairsdecreases until it reaches zero at TC. Therefore also the gap size decreases.The gap size as a function of temperature is given in Fig. 11.9.
The existence of Cooper pairs and the gap in the excitation spectrum canbe used to explain all observed phenomena discussed above. Here we merelydiscuss the resistance free transport and the existence of a critical currentdensity and a critical magnetic field. We do not show how the Meissner effectcan be explain but the basic idea is that an equation similar to the secondLondon equation (11.2) can be derived in the BCS model.
In order to explain the resistance free flow of current, it is useful to lookback at Fig. 7.13 and (7.21), (7.22) describing the conduction of normalelectrons in the quantum picture. The basic idea of the process was thatthe external electric field merely shifts the distribution of the electrons in kspace. For bands crossing the Fermi level this would lead to an increasinglyskewed distribution, i.e. to an increasing current density j. This processis limited by the fact that the electrons are scattered by lattice vibrations,defects and impurities.
189
isotope effect
densityof states
Debye temp.
el-phinteractionstrength
Chapter 9
Superconductivity
F = jB (9.1)
U = iR =
(9.2)
me v t
= eE (9.3)
j t
=ne2
meE (9.4)
rotE = dBdt
(9.5)
t
me
ne2rotj + B
= 0 (9.6)
E = iR =
Edl = dB
dt;
rotEdA =
BdA; rotE = B (9.7)
BT = Bc
1
T
Tc
2(9.8)
I(t) = I0et/ (9.9)
Eg = 3.53kBTc (9.10)
Vc =Eg
2e(9.11)
Bint = Bextez/ (9.12)
> /
2 (9.13)
Bc2 =
2
Bc (9.14)
B = µ0nI (9.15)2D
= 1013s (9.16)
vF = 106ms1 (9.17)107m (9.18)
TC = 1.13D exp1
g(EF )V(9.19)
27
number of electronsin Cooper pairs g(EF ) g(EF )D
superconductor at T=0
occupied single electron stats
unoccupied single electron states
occupied single electron states
2Δ
As the Cooper pairs are formed due to the electron-phonon interaction,one can expect the size of the gap to be in the order of a typical phononenergy hωD. This is indeed the case. Typically the gap size is given inrelation to the critical temperature TC. BCS theory predicts the gap atzero temperature to be ∆ = 3.53kBTC which amounts to just a few meVfor most superconductors. TC, in turn, can be predicted from the Debyetemperature, the electronic density of states at the Fermi level and V , aparameter measuring the electron-phonon coupling strength. The BCS resultfor the transition temperature, which is not derived here, is
TC = 1.13ΘD exp−1
g(EF )V. (11.5)
This equation tells us a lot about BCS type superconductivity. First ofall, the transition temperature is proportional to the Debye temperature.This readily explains the isotope effect since ΘD ∝ ωD ∝ M−1/2. It alsoshows that the Debye temperature basically sets the temperature scale ofthe phenomenon. The exponential cannot become larger than one so thatone cannot hope to get a transition temperature higher than 1.13ΘD. Inreality, the exponential is much smaller than one. Both the density of statesand the interaction strength enter the expression in the same way, meaningthat both increase the critical temperature.
To make matters even more complicated, the energy gain 2∆ for theformation of one Cooper pair depends on the number of Cooper pairs alreadythere, so that also the size of the gap in the excitation spectrum depends onthis number. As the temperature is raised, the number of Cooper pairsdecreases until it reaches zero at TC. Therefore also the gap size decreases.The gap size as a function of temperature is given in Fig. 11.9.
The existence of Cooper pairs and the gap in the excitation spectrum canbe used to explain all observed phenomena discussed above. Here we merelydiscuss the resistance free transport and the existence of a critical currentdensity and a critical magnetic field. We do not show how the Meissner effectcan be explain but the basic idea is that an equation similar to the secondLondon equation (11.2) can be derived in the BCS model.
In order to explain the resistance free flow of current, it is useful to lookback at Fig. 7.13 and (7.21), (7.22) describing the conduction of normalelectrons in the quantum picture. The basic idea of the process was thatthe external electric field merely shifts the distribution of the electrons in kspace. For bands crossing the Fermi level this would lead to an increasinglyskewed distribution, i.e. to an increasing current density j. This processis limited by the fact that the electrons are scattered by lattice vibrations,defects and impurities.
189
total energy gain g(EF )2 g(EF )22D
The gap at higher temperatures
1.00.8Temperature T(TC)
Gap
siz
e 6
(6(T
=0))
0.60.40.20.00.0
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
In
PbSn
Detection of the gap: tunnellingSuperconductorNormal metal
Insu
lato
r
Detection of the gap: tunnellingSuperconductorNormal metal
Insu
lato
r
2D
excited unpaired electrons
normal metal superconductor at T=0
unoccupied single electron states
EF
insu
lato
r
U=0
occupied single electron stats
unoccupied single electron states
occupied single electron states occupied single
electron states
Detection of the gap: tunnellingSuperconductorNormal metal
Insu
lato
r
2D
excited unpaired electrons
normal metal superconductor at T=0
unoccupied single electron states
EF
insu
lato
r
U=0
occupied single electron stats
unoccupied single electron states
occupied single electron states occupied single
electron states
occupied single electron statesoccupied single electron states
excited unpaired electrons
normal metal
unoccupied single electron states
EF
insu
lato
r
0<U<D/e
2D
superconductor at T=0
occupied single electron stats
unoccupied single electron states
occupied single electron states
Detection of the gap: tunnellingSuperconductorNormal metal
Insu
lato
r
2D
excited unpaired electrons
normal metal superconductor at T=0
unoccupied single electron states
EF
insu
lato
r
U=0
occupied single electron stats
unoccupied single electron states
occupied single electron states occupied single
electron states
occupied single electron statesoccupied single electron states
excited unpaired electrons
normal metal
unoccupied single electron states
EF
insu
lato
r
0<U<D/e
2D
superconductor at T=0
occupied single electron stats
unoccupied single electron states
occupied single electron states
excited unpaired electrons
normal metal
occupied single electron states
unoccupied single electron states
EF
insu
lato
r
U>D/e
2D
superconductor at T=0
occupied single electron stats
unoccupied single electron states
occupied single electron states
occupied single electron states
Detection of the gap: tunnellingSuperconductorNormal metal
Insu
lato
r
2D
excited unpaired electrons
normal metal superconductor at T=0
unoccupied single electron states
EF
insu
lato
r
U=0
occupied single electron stats
unoccupied single electron states
occupied single electron states occupied single
electron states
occupied single electron statesoccupied single electron states
excited unpaired electrons
normal metal
unoccupied single electron states
EF
insu
lato
r
0<U<D/e
2D
superconductor at T=0
occupied single electron stats
unoccupied single electron states
occupied single electron states
excited unpaired electrons
normal metal
occupied single electron states
unoccupied single electron states
EF
insu
lato
r
U>D/e
2D
superconductor at T=0
occupied single electron stats
unoccupied single electron states
occupied single electron states
occupied single electron states
tunn
ellin
g cu
rren
t (ar
b. u
nits
)
D/etunnelling voltage U
Detection of the gap: optical
• For radiation below hν < 2Δ no absorption, light is transmitted through a thin sheet of superconductor.
• For radiation below hν > 2Δ absorption takes place.
• Relevant light wavelength in the infrared.
hν hν
Detection of the gap: heat capacity
0
Al
1.0 2.00
1
2
3
4
T (K)
heat
cap
acity
(arb
. uni
ts)
cn
cs
Zero Resistance
Zero Resistance
• All Cooper pairs are in the same state and have THE SAME total k. For k=0, no current. For k≠0 supercurrent.
Zero Resistance
• All Cooper pairs are in the same state and have THE SAME total k. For k=0, no current. For k≠0 supercurrent.
• For a normal metal, single electrons can be scattered and be lost for the current. For a superconductor, one can only change the k of all Cooper pairs at the same time. This is VERY unlikely.
Zero Resistance
• All Cooper pairs are in the same state and have THE SAME total k. For k=0, no current. For k≠0 supercurrent.
• For a normal metal, single electrons can be scattered and be lost for the current. For a superconductor, one can only change the k of all Cooper pairs at the same time. This is VERY unlikely.
• Cooper pairs can be split up but this costs 2Δ and they might condensate quickly again. At high current densities, there is enough energy available to break them up. Also at high magnetic field densities.
Superconducting current in a ring
I
FB
Superconducting current in a ring
I
FB
=h
p
Superconducting current in a ring
I
FB
=h
p
n = 0,1,2...
Macroscopic coherence: apply Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization
2r = n = nh
p
2rp = nh
Superconducting current in a ring
I
FB
=h
p
n = 0,1,2...
Macroscopic coherence: apply Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization
2r = n = nh
p
2rp = nh
more generalIpdr = nh
Superconducting current in a ring
I
FB
p qAdr = hn
Ipdr = nh
Superconducting current in a ring
I
FB
p qAdr = hn
Ipdr = nh
p = msvj = nsqv
ms
nsq
Ijdr q
IAdr = nh
Superconducting current in a ring
I
FB
p qAdr = hn
Stoke’s integral theoremAdr =
curlAda =
Bda = B
Ipdr = nh
p = msvj = nsqv
ms
nsq
Ijdr q
IAdr = nh
Superconducting current in a ring
I
FB
p qAdr = hn
Stoke’s integral theoremAdr =
curlAda =
Bda = B
Ipdr = nh
p = msvj = nsqv
ms
nsq
Ijdr q
IAdr = nh
ms
nsq2
Ijdr B = n
h
q
Superconducting current in a ring
I
FBms
nsq2
Ijdr B = n
h
q
Superconducting current in a ring
I
FB
integration path inside the ring material
B = nh
q
ms
nsq2
Ijdr B = n
h
q
Superconducting current in a ring
The magnetic flux through the ring is quantized. q turns out to have a value of -2e in the experiment. So one flux quantum is
BT = Bc
1
T
Tc
2(9.16)
I(t) = I0et/ (9.17)
Eg = 3.53kBTc (9.18)
Vc =Eg
2e(9.19)
Bint = Bextez/ (9.20)
> /
2 (9.21)
Bc2 =
2
Bc (9.22)
B = µ0nI (9.23)2
D= 1013s (9.24)
vF = 106ms1 (9.25)
107m (9.26)
TC = 1.13D exp1
g(EF )V(9.27)
coherence and flux quantization
E(r)E(r)/4 = n(r)h (9.28)
E(r) =
4h
nei(r) (9.29)
E(r) =
4h
nei(r) (9.30)
(r) =
nei(r) (9.31)
(r) =
nei(r) (9.32)
pds = rh (9.33)
p = mv + qA (9.34)
j = nqv (9.35)
p =m
nqj + qA (9.36)
rh =m
nq
jds + q
Ads (9.37)
rh
q=
m
nq2
jds +
Bdf (9.38)
rh
q=
Bdf (9.39)
h
2e(9.40)
28
subject to the Pauli exclusion principle and as the temperature is loweredthey can condense into a single quantum state, the BCS ground state, de-scribed by one single wave function. This means that all the electrons form-ing Cooper pairs participate in a single wave function which macroscopicallyextends over the sample. Therefore one speaks of a high coherence of thesuperconducting state.
The concept of the single wave function can be used to describe the re-sistance free transport. In a normal conductor the individual electrons areaccelerated by an electric field and they can be scattered, giving rise to resis-tance. In a superconductor the whole condensate is accelerated. Scatteringcannot occur unless there is enough energy involved to destroy a Cooper pair.Therefore the current can flow without resistance.
Macroscopic coherence effects are of particular importance when consid-ering the penetration of a magnetic field through a superconducting ring,as shown in Fig. 11.13(a). If we assume that the superconducting currentis carried by the entire BCS condensate of Cooper pairs, we can apply theBohr quantisation condition as in the hydrogen atom but here for the totalmomentum p of the whole condensate.
!
pds = rh,
where r is some integer number. If the total momentum is quantised, thisimplies that also the total current through the ring and the magnetic fluxthrough its centre are quantised. It turns out that the magnetic flux canonly penetrate the superconducting ring in flux quanta of h/q where q is thecharge of the supercurrent carriers. Precise measurements have given a valueof q = 2e which is consistent with the BCS theory in which the Cooper pairshave a charge of 2e.
The flux quantum h/2e is very small, only 2.067×10−15Tm2. To set thisinto context, consider the earth’s magnetic field which is of the order of10−5T. In an area of one square millimetre, there would still be 1013 fluxquanta or so.
The fact that the flux in a superconducting ring is quantised can be ex-ploited in so-called superconducting quantum interference devices (SQIDs),as shown in Fig. 11.13(b). We cannot describe how these devices work indetail but the key idea is as follows. The device consists of two superconduct-ing ’forks’ and thin oxide layers or point contacts between them (so-calledweak links). The Cooper pairs from one superconductor can tunnel throughthe weak links into the other superconductor and there is definite relationbetween the phase of the superconducting state in one fork with that of theother fork. A magnetic field entering perpendicular through the forks gives
194
=
I
FB
integration path inside the ring material
B = nh
q
ms
nsq2
Ijdr B = n
h
q
movie of superconducting maglev trainfrom IFW Dresden
Many open questions
Many open questions
• Why does the train follow the tracks?
Many open questions
• Why does the train follow the tracks?
• Why does the train not fall down when turned upside down?
Many open questions
• Why does the train follow the tracks?
• Why does the train not fall down when turned upside down?
• How does the train “remember” the distance it has to be above the tracks?
Type I and type II superconductors
External magnetic field B0
Type I
l
BC
l
B = 0B = B
B
0Bin
t
int
int
C
M
0
0
0
0
0
Type I and type II superconductors
External magnetic field B0
Type I
l
BC
l
B = 0B = B
B
0Bin
t
int
int
C
M
0
0
0
0
0
Type II
B B
l =0
C1 C2
B
= B 0
int
B
= 0
int
0<B <B0int
B BC1 C2
lB
int
M
0
0
0
0
0
normalphase
mixedphasepure
supc.phase
external magnetic field B0
type II
B B
l =0
C1 C2
B
= B 0
int
B
= 0
int
0<B <B0int
B BC1 C2
lB
int
M
0
0
0
0
0
Vortices in type II superconductors
• The field penetrates through filaments of normal material, the rest remains superconducting.• These filaments are enclosed by vortices of
superconducting current.
side view
ΦB
top viewvortex
j
=h/2e
How does the magnetic flux penetrate the type II superconductor
• The magnetic field enters in the form of flux quanta in normal-state regions. These regions are surrounded by vortices of supercurrent.
• This can be made visible by Bitter method, optical techniques, scanning tunnelling techniques....
25 x 25 μm (educated guess)
Vortices in type II superconductors
• The vortices repel each other.
• If they can move freely, they form a hexagonal lattice.
• But if there are defects which “pin” the vortices, they cannot change their position.
25 x 25 μm (educated guess)
Vortices in type II superconductors
• Here the vortices can move quite freely.
• Their number changes as the external field is changed.
• For a very high field, the vortices move so close together that the superconductivity in between breaks up.
25 x 25 μm
25 x 35 μm
Vortices in type II superconductors
Vortices in type II superconductors
• The superconductor used in the train movie is a type II superconductor.
Vortices in type II superconductors
• The superconductor used in the train movie is a type II superconductor.
• It “pins” the vortices very strongly. Therefore the magnetic field it experienced while cooling through the phase transition is “frozen in”.
Vortices in type II superconductors
• The superconductor used in the train movie is a type II superconductor.
• It “pins” the vortices very strongly. Therefore the magnetic field it experienced while cooling through the phase transition is “frozen in”.
• This can explain the effects we did not understand before (staying on the tracks, train upside down, train on walls...).
Current-induced vortex movement
• A current through the material causes the vortices to move perpendicular to the current and to the magnetic field.
• This is very reminiscent of the Lorentz force.
• Vortex movement leads to energy dissipation and therefore resistance at very small current densities! This can be avoided by pinning the vortices.
Chapter 9
Superconductivity
F = jB (9.1)
U = iR =
(9.2)
mevt
= eE (9.3)
jt
=ne2
meE (9.4)
rotE = dBdt
(9.5)
t
me
ne2rotj + B
= 0 (9.6)
E = iR =
Edl = dB
dt;
rotEdA =
BdA; rotE = B (9.7)
BT = Bc
1
T
Tc
2(9.8)
I(t) = I0et/ (9.9)
Eg = 3.53kBTc (9.10)
Vc =Eg
2e(9.11)
Bint = Bextez/ (9.12)
> /
2 (9.13)
Bc2 =
2
Bc (9.14)
B = µ0nI (9.15)
27
force on vortex
j
Characteristic length scalestype I or type II superconductor
The penetration depth λ The coherence length ξsuperconductor
B0
λL
High-temperature superconductors
• Discovery of ceramic-like high-temperature superconductors
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000020406080
100120140
Year
Hg Pb NbNbNNb3Sn
Nb3Ge
La1.85Sr0.15CuO4
YBa2Cu3O7-x Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3O10+x
HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+x
high
est d
iscov
erd
T C(K
)
Cs2RbC60
MgB2
Structure
• Superconductivity in the Cu+O planes. Very anisotropic
Some properties
• Extreme type II behaviour (this is why the train worked).
• Low critical current densities (because of the anisotropy)
• Ceramic-like: difficult to turn into wires
What makes the high-temperature superconductors superconduct?
• One is reasonably sure that Cooper pairs are also responsible here.
• But there is a big dispute on how they are formed: interaction of electrons with phonons, magnetic excitations (magnons), collective excitations of the electron gas (plasmons) or something else?
High-temperature superconductors
BCS XYZ
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000020406080
100120140
Year
Hg Pb NbNbNNb3Sn
Nb3Ge
La1.85Sr0.15CuO4
YBa2Cu3O7-x Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3O10+x
HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+x
high
est d
iscov
erd
T C(K
)
Cs2RbC60
MgB2
Conclusions
Conclusions
• Very broad field. An exception to almost every rule we have discussed.
Conclusions
• Very broad field. An exception to almost every rule we have discussed.
• Ferromagnetism and superconductivity apparently mutually exclusive.
Conclusions
• Very broad field. An exception to almost every rule we have discussed.
• Ferromagnetism and superconductivity apparently mutually exclusive.
• But we have seem some similarities in the phase transition.
Conclusions
• Very broad field. An exception to almost every rule we have discussed.
• Ferromagnetism and superconductivity apparently mutually exclusive.
• But we have seem some similarities in the phase transition.
• Both are ways to lower the energy of the electrons at the Fermi level. The relative energy gain may seem small but this is only because the Fermi energy is so high.
Conclusions
• Very broad field. An exception to almost every rule we have discussed.
• Ferromagnetism and superconductivity apparently mutually exclusive.
• But we have seem some similarities in the phase transition.
• Both are ways to lower the energy of the electrons at the Fermi level. The relative energy gain may seem small but this is only because the Fermi energy is so high.
• There are also other mechanisms for this and interesting situations arise when several compete.