View
247
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Lecture Overview
• Our Thoughts About Others
• Our Feelings About Others
• Our Actions Toward Others
• Applying Social Psychology to Social Problems
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Introductory Definition
• Social Psychology: study of how other people influence our thoughts, feelings, & actions
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Social psychology • examines how other
persons influence our thoughts, feelings and actions– Thoughts include
attitudes and attributions
– Feelings include attraction and dislike
• Actions include social influence, aggression, and altruism
Attitude:
• learned predisposition to respond cognitively, affectively, & behaviorally to a particular object
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Attitudes:
• Cognitive: what you think
• Affective: physiological changes
• Behavioral: what you do
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Our Thoughts About Others: Cognitive Dissonance
• Cognitive Dissonance: feeling of discomfort created from a mismatch between an attitude & a behavior or between two competing attitudes
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Our Thoughts About Others: Cognitive Dissonance (Continued)
• Festinger & Carlsmith’s Cognitive Dissonance Study. Participants given VERY boring tasks to complete, & then paid either $1 or $20 to tell next participant the task was “very enjoyable” & “fun.”
• Result? Those paid $1 experienced greater cognitive dissonance, & therefore changed their attitude more than those paid $20.
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
• Three Key Factors:• Physical Attractiveness • Most important, yet culturally• influenced• Proximity: geographic closeness • Similarity: people prefer those who are like
themselves
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Interpersonal attraction
Interpersonal attraction
• People do tend to stick with people as attractive as they : the “matching hypothesis” This works between and within sexes.
• Why does this happen?
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Interpersonal attraction
• In a normal distribution of people 96% are neither extraordinary good looking nor extraordinarily unattractive. Most people in that 96% do not feel they have settled in choosing their mate.
• In fact, most married people rate their spouses as more attractive than themselves .
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Criteria for sexual selection?
• Rather consistently, women prefer mates somewhat older, men prefer younger mates.
• Women prefer wealthy high-status males• Men prefer younger, attractive women
• Any idea why?
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Interpersonal attraction
• Proximity: geographic closeness • Logistics• Familiarity• Mere exposure increases liking• Keeping a lasting relationship Similarity: people prefer those who are like
themselvesSo, do opposites attract? Maybe in personality
but not in social background or values.©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
D
• “What is Beautiful is Good”; Dion et al. , 1972People who are attractive are expectedto have better jobs, be nicer people etc.“Halo effect”
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Our Actions Toward Others: Social Influence
• Conformity: changing behavior because of real or imagined group pressure
• Obedience: following direct commands, usually from an authority figure
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Our Actions Toward Others: ConformityAsch’s Conformity Study• Participants were asked to select
the line closest in length to X.• When confederates first gave
obviously wrong answers (A or C), more than 1/3 of true subjects conformed & agreed with the incorrect choices.
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Our Actions Toward Others: Conformity (Continued)
Why do we conform?• Normative Social Influence: need for
approval & acceptance i.e. what are you wearing to the party?• Informational Social Influence: need
for information & direction: teach me!
• Reference Groups: we conform to people we like & admire because we want to be like them
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Our Actions Toward Others: Obedience
• Milgram’s obedience study: Participants serving as “teachers” were ordered to continue shocking someone with a known heart condition who is begging to be released.
• Result? 65% of “teachers” delivered highest level of shock (450 volts) to the pseudo-heart condition “learner.”
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Our Actions Toward Others: Obedience (Continued)
Four major factors affecting obedience:1. legitimacy & closeness of the authority
figure2. remoteness of the victim3. assignment of responsibility4. modeling/imitation
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Our Actions Toward Others: Group Processes
• Group membership involves:– Roles: set of behavior patterns
connected with particular – social positions– Deindividuation: anonymity leads to
reduced inhibition vs self-consciousness, & personal
responsibility
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Group Processes: “Power of the Situation”
Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Study• Students were randomly assigned to play
the role of either “prisoner” or “guard.”
• Original study, scheduled for 2 weeks, was stopped after 6 days due to serious psychological changes in both “prisoners” & “guards.”
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Group Processes: Problems with Decision Making
• Group Polarization: group movement toward either a riskier or more conservative decision; result depends on the members’ initial dominant tendency
• Groupthink: faulty decision making occurring when a highly cohesive group seeks agreement & avoids inconsistent information
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Our Actions Toward Others: Group Processes (Continued)
Symptoms of Groupthink: Illusion of invulnerability Belief in group’s morality Collective rationalizations Stereotypes of out-groups Self-censorship Illusion of unanimity Direct pressure on dissenters
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Our Actions Toward Others: Altruism
Why Don’t We Help?
• Diffusion of Responsibility: dilution, or diffusion, of personal responsibility
• Ambiguity of the Situation: unclear what help is needed
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Our Actions Toward Others: Altruism
• How can we increase helping?• Assign responsibility• Reduce
ambiguity • Increase
societal rewards
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010
Applying Social Psychology to Social Problems:
• How can we reduce destructive obedience? 1. Adjust socialization toward obedience2. Recognize power of the situation3. Protect against groupthink4. Avoid foot-in-the-door technique:
making a small request followed by increasingly larger requests
5. Guard against relaxed moral guard6. Increase disobedient models
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010