29
Lecture Overview Our Thoughts About Others Our Feelings About Others Our Actions Toward Others Applying Social Psychology t o Social Problems ©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Lecture Overview Our Thoughts About Others Our Feelings About Others Our Actions Toward Others Applying Social Psychology to Social Problems Applying Social

  • View
    247

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Lecture Overview

• Our Thoughts About Others

• Our Feelings About Others

• Our Actions Toward Others

• Applying Social Psychology to Social Problems

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Introductory Definition

• Social Psychology: study of how other people influence our thoughts, feelings, & actions

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Social psychology • examines how other

persons influence our thoughts, feelings and actions– Thoughts include

attitudes and attributions

– Feelings include attraction and dislike

• Actions include social influence, aggression, and altruism

Attitude:

• learned predisposition to respond cognitively, affectively, & behaviorally to a particular object

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Attitudes:

• Cognitive: what you think

• Affective: physiological changes

• Behavioral: what you do

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Thoughts About Others: Cognitive Dissonance

• Cognitive Dissonance: feeling of discomfort created from a mismatch between an attitude & a behavior or between two competing attitudes

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Thoughts About Others:

Cognitive Dissonance (Continued)

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Thoughts About Others: Cognitive Dissonance (Continued)

• Festinger & Carlsmith’s Cognitive Dissonance Study. Participants given VERY boring tasks to complete, & then paid either $1 or $20 to tell next participant the task was “very enjoyable” & “fun.”

• Result? Those paid $1 experienced greater cognitive dissonance, & therefore changed their attitude more than those paid $20.

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

• Three Key Factors:• Physical Attractiveness • Most important, yet culturally• influenced• Proximity: geographic closeness • Similarity: people prefer those who are like

themselves

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Interpersonal attraction

Interpersonal attraction

• People do tend to stick with people as attractive as they : the “matching hypothesis” This works between and within sexes.

• Why does this happen?

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Interpersonal attraction

• In a normal distribution of people 96% are neither extraordinary good looking nor extraordinarily unattractive. Most people in that 96% do not feel they have settled in choosing their mate.

• In fact, most married people rate their spouses as more attractive than themselves .

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Criteria for sexual selection?

• Rather consistently, women prefer mates somewhat older, men prefer younger mates.

• Women prefer wealthy high-status males• Men prefer younger, attractive women

• Any idea why?

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Interpersonal attraction

• Proximity: geographic closeness • Logistics• Familiarity• Mere exposure increases liking• Keeping a lasting relationship Similarity: people prefer those who are like

themselvesSo, do opposites attract? Maybe in personality

but not in social background or values.©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

D

• “What is Beautiful is Good”; Dion et al. , 1972People who are attractive are expectedto have better jobs, be nicer people etc.“Halo effect”

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Social Influence

• Conformity: changing behavior because of real or imagined group pressure

• Obedience: following direct commands, usually from an authority figure

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: ConformityAsch’s Conformity Study• Participants were asked to select

the line closest in length to X.• When confederates first gave

obviously wrong answers (A or C), more than 1/3 of true subjects conformed & agreed with the incorrect choices.

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Conformity (Continued)

Why do we conform?• Normative Social Influence: need for

approval & acceptance i.e. what are you wearing to the party?• Informational Social Influence: need

for information & direction: teach me!

• Reference Groups: we conform to people we like & admire because we want to be like them

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Obedience

• Milgram’s obedience study: Participants serving as “teachers” were ordered to continue shocking someone with a known heart condition who is begging to be released.

• Result? 65% of “teachers” delivered highest level of shock (450 volts) to the pseudo-heart condition “learner.”

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Milgram’s Shock Generator

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Obedience (Continued)

Four major factors affecting obedience:1. legitimacy & closeness of the authority

figure2. remoteness of the victim3. assignment of responsibility4. modeling/imitation

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Group Processes

• Group membership involves:– Roles: set of behavior patterns

connected with particular – social positions– Deindividuation: anonymity leads to

reduced inhibition vs self-consciousness, & personal

responsibility

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Group Processes: “Power of the Situation”

Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Study• Students were randomly assigned to play

the role of either “prisoner” or “guard.”

• Original study, scheduled for 2 weeks, was stopped after 6 days due to serious psychological changes in both “prisoners” & “guards.”

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Group Processes: Problems with Decision Making

• Group Polarization: group movement toward either a riskier or more conservative decision; result depends on the members’ initial dominant tendency

• Groupthink: faulty decision making occurring when a highly cohesive group seeks agreement & avoids inconsistent information

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Group Processes (Continued)

Symptoms of Groupthink: Illusion of invulnerability Belief in group’s morality Collective rationalizations Stereotypes of out-groups Self-censorship Illusion of unanimity Direct pressure on dissenters

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Altruism

Why Don’t We Help?

• Diffusion of Responsibility: dilution, or diffusion, of personal responsibility

• Ambiguity of the Situation: unclear what help is needed

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Latane & Darley’s 5-Step Decision Process

for Helping

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Altruism

• How can we increase helping?• Assign responsibility• Reduce

ambiguity • Increase

societal rewards

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Applying Social Psychology to Social Problems:

• How can we reduce destructive obedience? 1. Adjust socialization toward obedience2. Recognize power of the situation3. Protect against groupthink4. Avoid foot-in-the-door technique:

making a small request followed by increasingly larger requests

5. Guard against relaxed moral guard6. Increase disobedient models

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010