18
ECE-656: Fall 2011 Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive Professor Mark Lundstrom Electrical and Computer Engineering Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN USA 1 9/6/11 Lundstrom 2011 2 resistors

Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

ECE-656: Fall 2011

Lecture 7: Resistance:

Ballistic to Diffusive

Professor Mark Lundstrom Electrical and Computer Engineering

Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN USA

1 9/6/11

Lundstrom 2011 2

resistors

Page 2: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

3

Landauer picture

1D, 2D, or 3D resistor

ideal contact ideal contact

Current is positive when it flows into contact 2 (i.e. positive current flows in the -x direction).

Lundstrom 2011

4

driving “forces” for transport

Differences in occupation, f, produce current.

but differences in temperature also produce differences in f and can, therefore, drive current (thermoelectric effects).

Assumes TL1 = TL2 .

Lundstrom 2011

this week

(next week)

Page 3: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

5

transport regimes

Lundstrom 2011

Lundstrom ECE-656 F11 6

outline

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/

1) Review

2) 2D ballistic resistors

3) 2D diffusive resistors

4) Discussion

5) Summary

Page 4: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

7

an isothermal 2D resistor

Lundstrom 2011

8

the ballistic conductance

(ballistic)

Lundstrom 2011

Page 5: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

9

T = 0 K ballistic conductance

Resistance is independent of length, L.

Rball =

1M EF( )

h2q2 =

12.8kΩM

“quantized conductance”

Lundstrom 2011

If the number of modes is small, we can simply count them.

10

quantized conductance

Lundstrom 2011

B. J. van Wees, H. van Houten, C. W. J. Beenakker, J. G. Williamson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, D. van der Marel, and C. T. Foxon, ‘‘Quantized conductance of point contacts in a two-dimensional electron gas,’’ Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 848–851,1988.

Conductance is quantized in units of 2q2/h - it increases with W, but not linearly.

The conductance is finite as L 0.

W -->

Page 6: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

11

for wider resistors, M(E) ~ W

M EF( ) = gVW

2m* EF − EC( )π

M EF( ) = gV

W kF

π

depends on bandstructure!

Lundstrom 2011

2kF

2

2m* = EF − EC( ) How is M related to the sheet carrier density?

12

sheet carrier density at TL = 0 K

Lundstrom 2011

2kF

2

2m* = EF − EC( )

kx

ky

kF

nS =πkF

2

2π( )2A× 2 × gV ×

1A

nS = gV

kF2

Page 7: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

13

M(E) and nS

M EF( ) = gV

W kF

π

M EF( ) =W

2gV nS

πdepends only on nS

Lundstrom 2011

nS = gV

kF2

14

example: the channel of an n-MOSFET

nS = 1013 cm-2

Lundstrom 2011

M EF( ) = ?

for a rough estimate, assume TL = 0 K

M EF( ) =W

2gV nS

π W = 2L = 100 nm

Page 8: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

15

quantum confinement in a Si inversion layer

Lundstrom 2011

z

ener

gy --

>

W0

∞∞z

x

y

En =2n2π 2

2m*

m

* = 0.9m0

mt* = 0.19m0

m* = ?

Si conduction band

16

bandstructure effects on quantum confinement

Lundstrom 2011

z

ener

gy --

>

W0

∞∞z

x

ySi conduction band

unprimed ladder: m* = m

* gV = 2ε1

ε3

ε2

primed ladder: m* = mt* gV = 4

′ε1

′ε2

Page 9: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

17

quasi-2D carriers in the plane

Lundstrom 2011

z

x

ySi conduction band

unprimed ladder: m* = m

* gV = 2

primed ladder: m* = mt* gV = 4

confinement masses:

kx

ky

mDOS* = mt

*

mDOS* = mt

*m

*

D2D = gVmDOS*

π2

18

example: the channel of an n-MOSFET

nS = 1013 cm-2

Lundstrom 2011

M EF( ) = ?

Assume TL = 0 K and that only the lowest subband is occupied.

M EF( ) =W

2gV nS

π

W = 2L = 100 nm

gV = 2

M EF( ) = 36

Page 10: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

19

T = 0 K ballistic conductance

Resistance is independent of length, L.

Rball =

1M EF( )

h2q2 =

12.8kΩM

“quantized conductance”

Lundstrom 2011

If the number of modes is small, we can simply count them.

20

conductance in 2D (T > 0K)

Lundstrom 2011

Gball =

2q2

h+

∂∂EF

⎝⎜⎞

⎠⎟M E( ) f0 E( )dE∫( )

M E( ) =WgV

2m* E − EC( )π

Page 11: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

21

conductance in 2D (T > 0K)

Lundstrom 2011

Gball =

2q2

h+

∂∂EF

⎝⎜⎞

⎠⎟M E( ) f0 E( )dE∫( )

M E( ) =WgV

2m* E − EC( )π

22

conductance in 2D (T > 0K)

Lundstrom 2011

Page 12: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

23

conductance in 2D (T > 0K)

Lundstrom 2011

M2 D =

2m*kBTL

ππ2

F −1/ 2 ηF( ) = M2 D E − EC = kBTL( ) π2

F −1/ 2 ηF( )

<M> is the no. of modes in the “Fermi window”

24

example: the channel of an n-MOSFET

nS = 1013 cm-2

Lundstrom 2011

M EF( ) = ?

Repeat the calculation for TL = 300 K and find <M>.

M EF( ) =W

2gV nS

π= 36 TL = 0K( )

W = 2L = 100 nm

Page 13: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

Lundstrom 2011 25

outline

1) Review

2) 2D ballistic resistors

3) 2D diffusive resistors

4) Discussion

5) Summary

26

an isothermal 2D resistor

Lundstrom 2011

(TL1 = TL2)

Page 14: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

27

the TL = 0 diffusive conductance

Lundstrom 2011

28

ballistic to diffusive

Lundstrom 2011

Page 15: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

Lundstrom 2011 29

outline

1) Review

2) 2D ballistic resistors

3) 2D diffusive resistors

4) Discussion

5) Summary

30

example: nanoscale MOSFETs

Question: Do we expect this device to be closer to ballistic or to diffusive?

(Courtesy, Shuji Ikeda, ATDF, Dec. 2007)

RCH ≈ 215Ω-µm

µn ≈ 260 cm2 V-s

nS ≈ 6.7 ×1012 cm-2

L ≈ 60 nm

Lundstrom 2011

Page 16: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

31

mfp in a Si MOSFET

RCH ≈ 215Ω-µm

µn ≈ 260 cm2 V-s

nS ≈ 6.7 ×1012 cm-2

L ≈ 60 nm

Lundstrom 2011

Dn =

kBTL

qµn

(near-equilibrium, MB statistics)

Dn =

υTλ0

2(near-equilibrium, MB statistics, constant mfp)

λ0 =

2 kBTL q( )υT

µn

υT =

2kBTL

πm* = 1.2 ×107 cm/s λ0 ≈ 11 nm << L

diffusive

32

40 nm channel length III-V FETs

D. H. Kim and J. A. del Alamo, "Lateral and Vertical Scaling of In0.7Ga0.3As HEMTs for Post-Si-CMOS Logic Applications," IEEE TED, 55, pp. 2546-2553, 2008. Lundstrom 2011

λ0 >> L ballistic

Page 17: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

Lundstrom 2011 33

outline

1) Review

2) 2D ballistic resistors

3) 2D diffusive resistors

4) Discussion

5) Summary

34

key points

Lundstrom 2011

1) Conductors display a finite conductance (resistance) - even in the absence of scattering.

2) The resistance is quantized, and the quantum of conductance is 2q2/h.

3) The ballistic resistance sets a lower limit to device resistance and is becoming important in practical, room temperature devices.

4) Transport from the ballistic to diffusive limit is easily treated by using the transmission.

Page 18: Lecture 7: Resistance: Ballistic to Diffusive

35

2D resistor summary

G =

2q2

hT M =

2q2

hλ0

λ0 + LM

M =

π2

WM2 D E − EC = kBTL( )F −1/ 2 ηF( )

ηF = EF − ε1( ) kBTL

(parabolic energy bands) (constant mfp)

M2 D E − EC = kBTL( ) = gV

2m*kBTL

π

TL = 0 K:

M = M EF( )

MB statistics:

M =W h

4υT

nS

kBTL

G =

λ0

λ0 + LGball

R = 1+ λ0 L( )Rball

Lundstrom ECE-656 F11 36

questions

1) Review

2) 2D ballistic resistors

3) 2D diffusive resistors

4) Discussion

5) Summary