76
Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing Lecture 3: Consumer Choice September 15, 2015

Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Lecture 3:Consumer Choice

September 15, 2015

Page 2: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Overview

Course Administration

Ripped from the Headlines

Quantity Regulations

Consumer Preferences and Utility

Indifference Curves

Income and the Budget Constraint

Making a Choice with Utility and the Budget Constraint

Page 3: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Course Administration

1. Return problem sets

2. Problem set answers may be updated until problem sets arereturned

3. Problem set and RFH grades are posted on Blackboard• presentation is graded, mostly on success in relating to the

themes of the previous lecture• article finding is pass/fail

4. Any questions or outstanding issues?

Page 4: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

How What You’re Learning is Policy-RelevantRipped from Headlines presentation(s)

As a reminder, next week

Afternoon

Finder Presenter

Erica Harvey Yihan ChengBen Goebel Caroline DeCelles

Evening

Finder Presenter

Alex Severn Katie DeeterMcKenna Saady Anna Chukhno

Page 5: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Two Types of Quantity Regulations

We just looked at regulations on price. Now we considerregulations on quantity.

1. Quota ≡ a regulated (almost always limited) “quantity of agood or service provided”

2. Government provision of a good or service (skip for timereasons)

Page 6: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Analyzing Quotas

• What’s the impact of a quota on price?

• Give an example of a market with quotas

Page 7: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Quotas in PicturesMarket Equilibrium: How Does Supply Change with a Quota?

P

D

S

P*

QQ*

Page 8: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Quotas in PicturesSupply with a Quota: What Happens to Price?

P

D

S

P*

Q

S’

Qnew Q*

Page 9: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Quotas in PicturesSupply with a Quota: What Happens to CS and PS?

P

D

S

P*

Q

S’

quota price

Qnew Q*

Page 10: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Quotas in PicturesSupply with a Quota: What Happens to CS and PS?

P

D

S

P*

Q

S’

quota price

Qnew

CSnew

PSnew

Q*

Page 11: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Quotas in PicturesFiguring Out the Differences

P

D

S

P*

Q

S’

quota price

Qnew

A

C

DE

B

Q*

Page 12: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Figuring Out the Difference, Details

P

D

S

P*

Q

S’

quota price

Qnew

A

C

DE

B

Q*

• Before• CS =

A + B + C• PS = D + E

• After• CS = A• PS = B + D

• Difference• ∆CS = A−(A+B+C ) =−(B + C ) < 0

• ∆PS =(B+D)−(D+E ) = B−E ,sign ambiguous

• transfer from consumersto producers is B

• Note that nobody gets Cor E after → trades thatdon’t take place →DWL = C + E

Page 13: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Figuring Out the Difference, Details

P

D

S

P*

Q

S’

quota price

Qnew

A

C

DE

B

Q*

• Before• CS = A + B + C• PS =

D + E

• After• CS = A• PS = B + D

• Difference• ∆CS = A−(A+B+C ) =−(B + C ) < 0

• ∆PS =(B+D)−(D+E ) = B−E ,sign ambiguous

• transfer from consumersto producers is B

• Note that nobody gets Cor E after → trades thatdon’t take place →DWL = C + E

Page 14: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Figuring Out the Difference, Details

P

D

S

P*

Q

S’

quota price

Qnew

A

C

DE

B

Q*

• Before• CS = A + B + C• PS = D + E

• After• CS = A• PS = B + D

• Difference• ∆CS = A−(A+B+C ) =−(B + C ) < 0

• ∆PS =(B+D)−(D+E ) = B−E ,sign ambiguous

• transfer from consumersto producers is B

• Note that nobody gets Cor E after → trades thatdon’t take place →DWL = C + E

Page 15: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Figuring Out the Difference, Details

P

D

S

P*

Q

S’

quota price

Qnew

A

C

DE

B

Q*

• Before• CS = A + B + C• PS = D + E

• After• CS =

A• PS = B + D

• Difference• ∆CS = A−(A+B+C ) =−(B + C ) < 0

• ∆PS =(B+D)−(D+E ) = B−E ,sign ambiguous

• transfer from consumersto producers is B

• Note that nobody gets Cor E after → trades thatdon’t take place →DWL = C + E

Page 16: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Figuring Out the Difference, Details

P

D

S

P*

Q

S’

quota price

Qnew

A

C

DE

B

Q*

• Before• CS = A + B + C• PS = D + E

• After• CS = A• PS =

B + D

• Difference• ∆CS = A−(A+B+C ) =−(B + C ) < 0

• ∆PS =(B+D)−(D+E ) = B−E ,sign ambiguous

• transfer from consumersto producers is B

• Note that nobody gets Cor E after → trades thatdon’t take place →DWL = C + E

Page 17: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Figuring Out the Difference, Details

P

D

S

P*

Q

S’

quota price

Qnew

A

C

DE

B

Q*

• Before• CS = A + B + C• PS = D + E

• After• CS = A• PS = B + D

• Difference• ∆CS = A−(A+B+C ) =−(B + C ) < 0

• ∆PS =(B+D)−(D+E ) = B−E ,sign ambiguous

• transfer from consumersto producers is B

• Note that nobody gets Cor E after → trades thatdon’t take place →DWL = C + E

Page 18: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Figuring Out the Difference, Details

P

D

S

P*

Q

S’

quota price

Qnew

A

C

DE

B

Q*

• Before• CS = A + B + C• PS = D + E

• After• CS = A• PS = B + D

• Difference• ∆CS = A−(A+B+C ) =−(B + C ) < 0

• ∆PS =(B+D)−(D+E ) = B−E ,sign ambiguous

• transfer from

consumersto producers is B

• Note that nobody gets Cor E after → trades thatdon’t take place →DWL = C + E

Page 19: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Figuring Out the Difference, Details

P

D

S

P*

Q

S’

quota price

Qnew

A

C

DE

B

Q*

• Before• CS = A + B + C• PS = D + E

• After• CS = A• PS = B + D

• Difference• ∆CS = A−(A+B+C ) =−(B + C ) < 0

• ∆PS =(B+D)−(D+E ) = B−E ,sign ambiguous

• transfer from consumersto producers is

B• Note that nobody gets C

or E after → trades thatdon’t take place →DWL = C + E

Page 20: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Figuring Out the Difference, Details

P

D

S

P*

Q

S’

quota price

Qnew

A

C

DE

B

Q*

• Before• CS = A + B + C• PS = D + E

• After• CS = A• PS = B + D

• Difference• ∆CS = A−(A+B+C ) =−(B + C ) < 0

• ∆PS =(B+D)−(D+E ) = B−E ,sign ambiguous

• transfer from consumersto producers is B

• Note that nobody gets Cor E after → trades thatdon’t take place →DWL = C + E

Page 21: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Why Do We Study the Consumer’s Problem?

• Build up to the demand curve from first principles

• Understand consumer choices

• Clearly illuminate areas where policy can act

• Illustrate welfare consequences of policy choices

Page 22: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Assumptions about Consumer Preferences

1. Completeness and Rankability• You can compare all your consumption choices• For two bundles A and B, you always either

• prefer A to B• prefer B to A• are indifferent between A and B

2. More is better – at least no worse – than less

3. Transitivity• If A is preferred to B, and B to C , then A > C

4. The more you have of a particular good, the less of somethingelse you are willing to give up to get more of that good

Page 23: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

What is Utility?

Overall satisfaction or happiness

• Measured in utils!

• This framework allows us to describe what consumption orhabits make you happier than other consumptions or habits

• It’s not a tool for comparing across people

Page 24: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

What is Utility?

Overall satisfaction or happiness

• Measured in utils!

• This framework allows us to describe what consumption orhabits make you happier than other consumptions or habits

• It’s not a tool for comparing across people

Page 25: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Some Example Utility Functions

Most general U = U(X ,Y ).

They can take many forms

• U = U(X ,Y ) = XY

• U = U(X ,Y ) = X + Y

• U = U(X ,Y ) = X 0.7Y 0.3

Page 26: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Some Example Utility Functions

Most general U = U(X ,Y ).They can take many forms

• U = U(X ,Y ) = XY

• U = U(X ,Y ) = X + Y

• U = U(X ,Y ) = X 0.7Y 0.3

Page 27: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Marginal Utility

Marginal utility ≡ “additional utility consumer receives from anadditional unit of a good or service”

MUX =∆U(X ,Y )

∆X

(=

∂U

∂X

)MUY =

∆U(X ,Y )

∆Y

(=

∂U

∂Y

)

What is true about marginal utility of X as consumption of Xincreases?

Page 28: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Marginal Utility

Marginal utility ≡ “additional utility consumer receives from anadditional unit of a good or service”

MUX =∆U(X ,Y )

∆X

(=

∂U

∂X

)MUY =

∆U(X ,Y )

∆Y

(=

∂U

∂Y

)What is true about marginal utility of X as consumption of Xincreases?

Page 29: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Utility and Comparisons

• Ordinal: we can rank bundles from best to worst

• Not cardinal: we cannot say how much one bundle is preferredto another in fixed units

• We cannot make interpersonal comparisons

No other assumptions on utility apart from the four preferenceassumptions.

Page 30: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Describing Your Utility

• A consumer is indifferent between two bundles (X1,Y1) and(X2,Y2) when U(X1,Y1) = U(X2,Y2)

• An indifference curve is a line where utility is constant: acombination of all consumption bundles that give the sameutility

Page 31: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Working Up to an Indifference Curve

• Give me two items

• Each axis is a quantity of those items

• Give me some points where you are equally happy

• Give me a point where you are less happy

• Give me some points where you are equally less happy

Page 32: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Working Up to an Indifference Curve

• Give me two items

• Each axis is a quantity of those items

• Give me some points where you are equally happy

• Give me a point where you are less happy

• Give me some points where you are equally less happy

Page 33: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Working Up to an Indifference Curve

• Give me two items

• Each axis is a quantity of those items

• Give me some points where you are equally happy

• Give me a point where you are less happy

• Give me some points where you are equally less happy

Page 34: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Working Up to an Indifference Curve

• Give me two items

• Each axis is a quantity of those items

• Give me some points where you are equally happy

• Give me a point where you are less happy

• Give me some points where you are equally less happy

Page 35: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Why Can We Draw Indifference Curves?

• Because of the assumptions we made at the beginning aboutpreferences: completeness and rankability

• All bundles have a utility level and we can rank them

Page 36: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Indifference Curves Level and Slope

What does “more is better” tell us?

• That higher indifference curves give more utility

• Curve must have a negative slope• Suppose that you increase your consumption of X• “More is better” → you are happier• To be equally happy as before, you should give up some Y

Page 37: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Indifference Curves Level and Slope

What does “more is better” tell us?

• That higher indifference curves give more utility

• Curve must have a negative slope• Suppose that you increase your consumption of X• “More is better” → you are happier• To be equally happy as before, you should give up some Y

Page 38: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

More Utility on Curves Farther From Origin

Page 39: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Indifference Curve Shape

• Curves never cross• it would violate

transitivity

• Curves are U-like (convex)with respect to the origin

• Comes from assumptionabout diminishingmarginal utility

• Your willingness to tradeoff differs along the curve

Page 40: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Steepness of the Indifference Curve

• We know that you areequally happy anywherealong the indifference curve

• So what changes as youmove along the curve?

• you are trading off X andY

• the rate at which youtrade them off tells ushow much you value them

Page 41: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Steepness of the Indifference Curve

• We know that you areequally happy anywherealong the indifference curve

• So what changes as youmove along the curve?

• you are trading off X andY

• the rate at which youtrade them off tells ushow much you value them

Page 42: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

When the curve is steep, what are you willing to give upmore of?

QX

QY

Page 43: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

When the curve is steep, what are you willing to give upmore of?

QX

QY

Page 44: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

When the curve is steep, what are you willing to give upmore of?

QX

QY

ΔQY

ΔQX

Page 45: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

When the curve is flat, what are you willing to give upmore of?

QX

QY

Page 46: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

When the curve is flat, what are you willing to give upmore of?

QX

QY

Page 47: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

When the curve is flat, what are you willing to give upmore of?

QX

QY

ΔQY

ΔQX

Page 48: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Quantifying the Trade-off in the Indifference Curve

• How much of X are you willing to give up for Y ?

• We call the Marginal Rate of Substitution the trade-offbetween these two

• Define

MRSXY =MUX

MUY= −slope of indifference curve

• We can rewrite as

MRSXY =MUX

MUY= −∆Y

∆X

(=

∂U∂X∂U∂Y

)• It’s a rate of change along the indifference curve

• Is it the same everywhere on the curve? Not necessarily.

• If you want a derivation, see the textbook!

Page 49: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Quantifying the Trade-off in the Indifference Curve

• How much of X are you willing to give up for Y ?

• We call the Marginal Rate of Substitution the trade-offbetween these two

• Define

MRSXY =MUX

MUY= −slope of indifference curve

• We can rewrite as

MRSXY =MUX

MUY= −∆Y

∆X

(=

∂U∂X∂U∂Y

)• It’s a rate of change along the indifference curve

• Is it the same everywhere on the curve?

Not necessarily.

• If you want a derivation, see the textbook!

Page 50: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Quantifying the Trade-off in the Indifference Curve

• How much of X are you willing to give up for Y ?

• We call the Marginal Rate of Substitution the trade-offbetween these two

• Define

MRSXY =MUX

MUY= −slope of indifference curve

• We can rewrite as

MRSXY =MUX

MUY= −∆Y

∆X

(=

∂U∂X∂U∂Y

)• It’s a rate of change along the indifference curve

• Is it the same everywhere on the curve? Not necessarily.

• If you want a derivation, see the textbook!

Page 51: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Curves for Perfect ComplementsWork with your neighbor!

• Suppose we have two goodsthat are perfectcomplements

• X and Y being perfectcomplements means each isuseless without the other

• What do the indifferencecurves look like?

• We write this utility asU = min{aX , bY }

QX

QY

Page 52: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Curves for Perfect ComplementsWork with your neighbor!

• Suppose we have two goodsthat are perfectcomplements

• X and Y being perfectcomplements means each isuseless without the other

• What do the indifferencecurves look like?

• We write this utility asU = min{aX , bY }

QX

QY

Page 53: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Curves for SubstitutesWork with your neighbor!

• Suppose we have two goodsthat are perfect substitutes

• What do the indifferencecurves look like?

QX

QY

Page 54: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Curves for SubstitutesWork with your neighbor!

• Suppose we have two goodsthat are perfect substitutes

• What do the indifferencecurves look like?

• Write as U = aX + bY

QX

QY

A

A

Page 55: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Budget Constraint Assumptions

1. Each good has a fixed price and infinite supply

2. Each consumer has a fixed amount of income to spend

3. The consumer cannot save or borrow

Page 56: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Defining the Budget Constraint

Budget constraint:I = PXQX + PYQY

• feasible bundle ≡ combinations of X and Y that theconsumer can purchase with his income

• infeasible bundle ≡ all the combinations the consumer is justtoo poor to get

Page 57: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Drawing the Budget ConstraintWhat if you spend all your money on X or Y ?

QX

QY

Page 58: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Drawing the Budget Constraint

QX

QY

I/PX

I/PY

Page 59: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Drawing the Budget Constraint

QX

QY

I/PX

I/PY

Page 60: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Drawing the Budget Constraint

QX

QY

Feasible set: Things you can buy

I/PX

I/PY

Page 61: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Drawing the Budget Constraint

QX

QY

Feasible set: Things you can buy

Infeasible set: Things you cannot afford!

I/PX

I/PY

Page 62: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Slope of the Budget Constraint

Algebra of the slope

I = PXQX + PYQY

PYQY = I − PXQX

QY =I

PY− PXQX

PY

QY = −PX

PYQX +

I

PY

So an additional unit of QX requires you to give up PXPY

of QY

Page 63: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Slope of the Budget Constraint

Algebra of the slope

I = PXQX + PYQY

PYQY = I − PXQX

QY =I

PY− PXQX

PY

QY = −PX

PYQX +

I

PY

So an additional unit of QX requires you to give up PXPY

of QY

Page 64: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Slope of the Budget Constraint

Algebra of the slope

I = PXQX + PYQY

PYQY = I − PXQX

QY =I

PY− PXQX

PY

QY = −PX

PYQX +

I

PY

So an additional unit of QX requires you to give up PXPY

of QY

Page 65: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

What Affects the Position of the Budget Constraint?

• Things that shift the slope

• Change in prices, PX or PY

• And how do they change things?

• Things that don’t change the slope, but move the line in andout

• Change in income• How does this change the picture?

Page 66: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

What Affects the Position of the Budget Constraint?

• Things that shift the slope• Change in prices, PX or PY

• And how do they change things?

• Things that don’t change the slope, but move the line in andout

• Change in income• How does this change the picture?

Page 67: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

What Affects the Position of the Budget Constraint?

• Things that shift the slope• Change in prices, PX or PY

• And how do they change things?

• Things that don’t change the slope, but move the line in andout

• Change in income• How does this change the picture?

Page 68: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

What Affects the Position of the Budget Constraint?

Page 69: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

How to Be As Happy as Possible

• Maximize your utility givenyour budget constraint

• How do you do it?

Page 70: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

How to Be As Happy as Possible

• Maximize your utility givenyour budget constraint

• How do you do it?

Page 71: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Algebra of Utility Maximization

• Utility is maximized, given the budget constraint, when theslope of the indifference curve is tangent to the budgetconstraint

• tangency → equality

−MRSXY = −PX

PY

− MUX

MUY= −PX

PY

MUX

PX=

MUY

PY

Page 72: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Algebra of Utility Maximization

• Utility is maximized, given the budget constraint, when theslope of the indifference curve is tangent to the budgetconstraint

• tangency → equality

−MRSXY = −PX

PY

− MUX

MUY= −PX

PY

MUX

PX=

MUY

PY

Page 73: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Algebra of Utility Maximization

• Utility is maximized, given the budget constraint, when theslope of the indifference curve is tangent to the budgetconstraint

• tangency → equality

−MRSXY = −PX

PY

− MUX

MUY= −PX

PY

MUX

PX=

MUY

PY

Page 74: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

In-Class Problem

Sarah gets utility from soda (S) and hotdogs (H). Her utility

function is U = S0.5H0.5, MUS = 0.5H0.5

S0.5 , and MUH = 0.5 S0.5

H0.5 .Sarah’s income is $12, and the prices of soda and hotdogs are $2and $3, respectively.

1. Draw Sarah’s budget constraint

2. What amount of sodas and hotdogs makes Sarah happiest,given her budget constraint? (Recall that you have twoequations and two unknowns.)

Page 75: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

What We Did This Class

1. Quotas

2. Preferences and utility

3. Indifference curves

4. Budget constraint

5. Optimization

Page 76: Lecture 3: Consumer Choice

Admin RFH Reg. Q Utility Ind. Curves Budget Cons. Optimizing

Next Class

• Turn in Problem Set 3

• Elasticity: GLS, Section 2.5 and read about avocados

• Paper assignment handout