Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
MECH 466Microelectromechanical Systems
University of VictoriaDept. of Mechanical Engineering
Lecture 20:Optical Tools for MEMS Imaging
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
2
Optical Microscopes
Video Microscopes
Scanning Electron Microscopes (SEM)
Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM)
Overview
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
3
Due to the small size of MEMS, various microscopy methods are required to inspect them.
The basic optical system is illustrated to the right.
It consists of:
Objective Lens
Light Tube
Eyepiece
Optical Microscopes
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
Objective Lens
Light Tube
Eyepiece
Object
Human Eye
Light
4
Numerical Aperture (NA)
Total Magnification
Field of View
Resolution
Compound Optical Microscope Definitions:
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
WorkingDistance φ Angle of Incidence
Field of View
5
Optical Microscope Transmission and Bright-field Illumination
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
CondensorLense
Light Source
TransmissionIllumination
Transmission IlluminationIncident Illumination
Light SourceIncident
Illumination
Bright-field IlluminationIncident Illumination
Light Source
6
Optical Microscope Co-Axial Illumination
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
LightPort
50%ReflectiveMirror
Co-Axial Illumination
7© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
Optical Microscope Illumination
Transmission Illumination:Pro’s: Great illumination, can use ‘phase contrast’ for translucent
objects, can use for high magnification viewing of biological cells.Con’s: Sample and holder must be transparent.
Incident Illumination:Pro’s: Inexpensive, easy setup, only needs natural light for low
magnification.Con’s: Insufficient light for high magnification.
Co-Axial Illumination:Pro’s: Great illumination for opaque or reflective objects, and is great
for very high magnifications.Con’s: Expensive. Requires special light tube, beam splitter mirror, in
addition to light source.
8
CCD Cameras vs. CMOS Camera
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
CCD:Pro’s: High quantum efficiency of 60-70%, low image noise,
excellent low light performanceCon’s: Expensive to manufacture, slow capture rates due to
fundamental design
CMOS:Pro’s: Inexpensive to manufacture, very fast capture rate, individually
addressable capture areasCon’s: Lower quantum efficiency than CCD’s, resulting in higher
image noise, and higher illumination requirements.
CCD:Charge Coupled Device
APS - CMOSActive Pixel SensorComplimentary Metal Oxide Semiconductor
9
CCD Camera Operation
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
Accumulation of charge. Every photon that strikes the sensor area adds charge to the device. You can think of each sensor area like a ‘photon well’ that collects incoming photons. [Wikimedia Commons, by M. Schmid]
After a defined ‘exposure time’ the total charge in each ‘photon well’ must be tallied. However, the wells cannot be individually addressed, therefore, they must be ‘shifted’ from one side to the other. [Wikimedia Commons, by M. Schmid]
There are three different styles of CCD’s employing different schemes to ‘shift the charge’ from one well to the next.Full-Frame CCDFrame TransferInterline Transfer [Wikimedia Commons]
10
CMOS Camera Operation
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
Operation of the APS CMOS ImagerFeatures: - On chip amplification and filtering
- Individually addressable pixels[Wikimedia Commons]
Operation of the APS CMOS ImagerMust use ‘micro-lens’ to concentrate light into the sensor, due to space required for amplifier or other electronics[Samsung]
11
SEM Microscopes use tightly focused electron beams, that are scanned across substrates.
The backscattered or ‘reflected’ electrons are collected by a sensor, and interpreted as an image.
Scanning Electron Microscope
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
CamScan Model CS44 Scanning Electron Microscope[www.tescan-usa.com] Sample of SEM image of Ant
[UVic SEM facility]
12
SEM Images from Demonstration
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
Failure of Bonding Pad[UVic SEM facility]
Microassembly of Prototype Device[UVic SEM facility]
13
The following movie describes the operation of a typical SEM system:
The diagram to the right details various components of the SEM.
Scanning Electron Microscope
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
SEM Operation Movie [Museum-of-Science, http://www.mos.org/sln/sem]
SEM Schematic Diagram[http://mse.iastate.edu/microscopy]
14
The electron gun creates the supply of electrons used to form the scanning beam.
The entire assembly must operate in a vacuum, otherwise the filament will ‘burn’ in the presence of oxygen, or can be contaminated in the presence of other gasses.
Scanning Electron Microscope
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
SEM electron gun assembly[http://mse.iastate.edu/microscopy]
15
Optical glass lenses cannot be used to focus an electron beam.
Only magnetic fields can deflect electrons, therefore, ‘magnetic lenses have been designed for this purpose.
Scanning Electron Microscope
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
SEM Cylindrical Magnetic Lens Assembly[http://mse.iastate.edu/microscopy]
16
When the electron beam strikes the target surface, two main types of reflections result:
Scanning Electron Microscope
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
Beam-Sample-Interaction [www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/sem]
17
Conductivity of the sample is of paramount importance.In order to have a good backscatter of electrons, the target must not
build up static charge.Gold sputtering can be used to make any target conductive.
SEM Sample Preparation
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
Gold Sputter Coater for SEM use[http://mse.iastate.edu/microscopy]
18
Scanning probe microscopes (SPMs) are a family of instruments used for studying ‘surface properties’ of materials, with image resolutions ranging from the atomic to the micron level.
All SPMs contain the components illustrated in the figure below.
Scanning Probe Microscopy
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
SPM Illustration [image from Chang Liu]
19
The scanning tunneling microscope (STM) is the ancestor of all scanning probe microscopes (SPM).
The STM was invented in 1981 by Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer at IBM Zurich. Five years later they were awarded the Nobel prize in physics for its invention.
The STM was the first instrument to generate real-space images of surfaces with atomic resolution.
Scanning Tunneling Microscopy
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
STM Operation Principle [Chang Liu] STM Tip Detail [image from Chang Liu]
20
The atomic force microscope (AFM) probes the surface of a sample with a sharp tip less than 100Å in diameter. The tip is located at the free end of a cantilever that is 100 to 200µm long. Forces between the tip and the sample surface cause the cantilever to bend, or deflect. A sensor measures the cantilever deflection as the tip is scanned over the sample, or the sample is scanned under the tip. The measured cantilever deflections allow a computer to generate a map of surface topography.
Several forces typically contribute to the deflection of an AFM cantilever. The force most commonly associated with atomic force microscopy is an interatomic force called the van der Waals force. The dependence of the van der Waals force upon the distance between the tip and the sample is shown in figure below.
Atomic Force Microscopy
© N. Dechev, University of VictoriaAFM Interatomic Force vs Tip to Sample Distance[Image from Chang Liu]
21
In non-contact mode, the system vibrates a stiff cantilever near its resonant frequency (typically from 100 to 400 kHz) with an amplitude of a few tens of angstroms. Then it detects changes in the resonant frequency or vibration amplitude as the tip comes near the sample surface. The sensitivity of this detection scheme provides sub-angstrom vertical resolution in the image, as with contact AFM.
In contact AFM mode, also known as repulsive mode, an AFM tip makes soft "physical contact" with the sample.
AFM System Diagram
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
AFM Operational Modes[Images from Chang Liu]
22
Magnetic force microscopy (MFM) images the spatial variation of magnetic forces on a sample surface. For MFM, the tip is coated with a ferromagnetic thin film.
The system operates in non-contact mode, detecting changes in the resonant frequency of the cantilever induced by the magnetic field's dependence on tip-to-sample separation. MFM can be used to image naturally occurring and deliberately written domain structures in magnetic materials.
Note: An image taken with a magnetic tip contains information about both the topography and the magnetic properties of a surface
Magnetic Force Microscopy
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria
Hard Disk Surface. Field of View is 30um[Image from Chang Liu]
23
There are numerous other ‘SPM’ methods such as:
- Scanning Hall Probe Microscopy- Lateral Force Microscopy (LFM)- Force Modulation Microscopy (FMM)- Electron Force Microscopy (EFM)- Scanning Thermal Microscopy (SThM)- Plus others...
All these methods use various MEMS based ‘micro-tips’ to perform the ‘surface scan’.
Many more SPM Methods
© N. Dechev, University of Victoria SEM of SPM Tips [Image from Chang Liu]