Upload
chloe-rodgers
View
230
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Lecture 19: Punctuated Equilibrium
Background:
• paleontology: idiographic → nomothetic
(descriptive → theoretical)
Punctuated Equilibrium first introduced by:
• Mayr (1954): allopatric speciation model
Application to paleontology → REVOLUTION!
Tenets of Punctuated Equilibrium1) neontology informs paleontology
(understand past via present)2) speciation is cladogenesis, not anagenesis
“real speciation” vs. “phyletic speciation”3) speciation by peripheral isolates4) widespread pop’ns change slowly, if at all5) sp. usually develop in geog. limited regions6) sp. develop in stratigraphically limited extent7) abrupt appearance of new spp. (fossil record)8) adaptive change mostly during speciation9) trends in adaptation: sp. selection (sp. sorting)
Fossil Record
• punctuated stasis real, not an artifact of preservation
Taphonomy: how orgs are preserved as fossils
Geological Processes:
• sediment deposition (varies in time & space)
• erosion
• compression
• hard vs. soft parts
• niches - skewed samples (characteristics of env’t)
Paleontology• phyletic gradualism• anagenesis is most important• “Species problem” (chronospecies - only morph)
time
mor
ph
species
rest are intermediates
Bias in LiteratureEvidence supporting gradualism• e.g. microscopic protoctists: radiolarians,
diatoms, foramsBut characteristics of organisms:• asexual or alternation of generations• no genetic exchange among lineages• enormous pop’ns: no local isolation• ecophenotypic variation: no changes in
gene freq.; responses to environment
Problems...
• Large studies of bryozoans, molluscs, mammals do not fit gradualist model
• Stasis with sudden appearance of new forms
“Punctuated Equilibrium”
Neontology1) Modern spp: mostly cladogenesis:
multiplicat’n & diversificat’n2) Most common speciation: allopatric isolates3) Speciation rare (prob extinction > prob speciation)4) Parent to daughter transition time: short5) Sig. changes in daughter pop’n (founder effect)6) Adap’ns in daughter pop’ns excluded from parental pop’ns
(RIMs)7) Gene flow in parent pop’n inhibits direct’nal change
(genetic homeostasis)8) Most changes in morph restricted to speciation events
Implications of P.E. for Paleontology
• Speciation:
Short timeline
Small area
• Sudden appearance in fossil record with no transitional forms
Why controversial?
• Panselectionist view (adaptationist program)
• Each feature under constant selection
• Species “tracking” envt’l changes in “adaptive landscape”
Explanations for stasis
• Fossil record incomplete
• Stabilizing selection
But: evidence for spp. stability in spite of envt’l change
e.g. glaciations: some gradual changes but many spp. unchanged (migration)
Current Ideas:
Stasis maintained by :
• integrated gene complexes
• developmental constraints
• gene flow in large populations
“polyhedron” vs. “rolling ball”
Is rapid change always linked with Speciation?
• Cladogenesis w/o Anagenesis:
e.g. Plethodon (salamanders)
- diverged 60 mya (molecular)
- little morph change
• Anagenesis w/o Cladogenesis:
e.g. mimetic butterflies; ring species
-much geog. var’n w/o speciation
Population Genetics:
• Wright (1977):
“Shifting Balance”: Drift - Gene Flow + Selection(Local Pop’ns) (Among Pop’ns)
• may lead to large, adaptive changes in a widespread pop’n
• rapid evolutionary changes with changes in ecological conditions
Phenotypic space• Adaptation to new conditions more likely if many
spp. rather than one species• occupy more “phenotypic space”:
character x
char
acte
r y new
character optima
Evidence• “Living Fossils”: clades with low spp. diversity( speciation; anagenesis)But:
Minnows (many spp.) Sunfish (few spp.)
Arose at similar timeNo diff’n in morph divergence
Speciation Morph Evol’nConclusion: do not need cladogenesis for anagenetic changeBut, speciation is necessary for adaptive radiation into sympatric niches
Species Selection (Species Sorting)
• Major tenet of P.E.
• concept: related spp. overlap in niche space
competition = displacement; extinction
• 2 main processes leading to anagenetic change:
Differential Speciation
Differential Extinction
Implications:
• Very different views about properties of spp.
P.E. : survival of a sp. depends on species-specific properties
Species are units with integrity (not just collections of pop’ns or individuals)e.g. tendency for rapid speciation a property of sp.,
not of individuals
Comparisons of Speciation Rates
African antelopes: impalas: slow
wildebeest : fast
Marine Snails : planktonic larva: slow
non-planktonic : fast
b/c of Genetic Isolation
same in:
Burrowing rodents: coruros: slow
tuco-tuco : fast
• Traditional Neo-Darwinists: no diff’n b/w sp. selection & NS
• Reductionist viewpoint : orgs are “gene vehicles” (e.g. Dawkins)
• Don’t see spp. as “entities”
• Implication: If species selection is real:
Macroevolution is not Microevolution writ large!
Phenomena at microevolutionary scale may have
little to say about major evolutionary events.