Upload
lamlien
View
230
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Hui Hu
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Iowa State University
Ames, Iowa 50011, U.S.A
Lecture # 16: Review for Final Exam
AerE 344 Lecture Notes
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
AerE343L: Dimensional Analysis and Similitude
Commonly used non-
dimensional parameters:
force tension surface
force inertial WeNumber,Weber
force inertial
force lcentrifugaStr Number, Strohal
forcelity compressib
force inertialM Number,Mach
forcegravity
force inertial
lgFr Number, Froude
force viscous
force inertialRe number, Reynolds
force inertial
force pressureEu number,Euler
2
2
lV
V
l
c
V
V
VL
V
p
Similitude:
• Geometric similarity: the model
have the same shape as the
prototype.
• Kinematic similarity: condition
where the velocity ratio is a
constant between all corresponding
points in the flow field.
• Dynamic similarity: Forces which
act on corresponding masses in the
model flow and prototype flow are
in the same ratio through out the
entire flow
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Measurement Uncertainties
• “Error” is the difference between the experimentally-determined value and its true value;
therefore, as error decreases, accuracy is said to increase.
• Total error, U, can be considered to be composed of two components:
– a random (precision) component,
– a systematic (bias) component,
– We usually don’t know these exactly, so we estimate them with P and B, respectively.
222 PBU
X
True value
X=100
Bias error
precision error
measured value
X=101
Repeatability Precision Error
Reproducibility Both Bias and Precision Errors
truemtruemeasurederror AAEAAA true
error
relativeA
AE
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Measurement Uncertainties
pppV
BernoulliVpp
statictotal
statictotal
2)(2
)(,2
1 2
222
RRR PBU
Uncertainty in velocity V:
J
i
i
i
R
J
i
i
i
R PX
RPB
X
RB
1
2
2
1
2
2 ;
M
j
ii jBB
1
2
For a large number of
samples (N>10) ii SP 2
N
kkii
N
k
ikii XN
XXXN
S1
21
1
2 1;
1
1
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Pressure Measurement Techniques
• Deadweight gauges:
• Elastic-element gauges:
• Electrical Pressure transducers:
• Wall Pressure measurements
– Remote connection
– Cavity mounting
– Flush mounting
• Pressure Measurements inside Flow Field:
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
)(2
)(,2
1
0
2
0
stat
stat
ppV
BernoulliVpp
• Advantage:
• Simple
• cheap
• Disadvantage:
• averaged velocity only
• Single point measurements
• Low measurement accuracy
Velocity measurement techniques – Pitot –Static Probe
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Velocity measurement techniques – Hotwire Probe
• Advantage:
• High accuracy
• High dynamic response
• Disadvantage:
• Single point measurements
• Fragile, easy to broke
• Much more expansive
compared with pitot-static
probe.
Flow Field
Current flow
through wire
The rate of which heat is removed from the
sensor is directly related to the velocity of
the fluid flowing over the sensor
V
• Constant-current anemometry
• Constant-temperature anemometry
),(2
www TVqRi
dt
dTmc
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
AerE311L: The nature of light
• Light as electromagnetic waves.
• Light as photons.
• Color of light
• Index of reflection
1/ 0
vcn
sm /3x10c 8
0
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Shadowgraph and Schlieren technique
• Index of refraction:
• Depend on variation of index of refraction in a transparent medium and the resulting effect on a light beam passing through the test section
• Shadowgraph systems: are used to indicate the variation of the second derivatives (normal to the light beam) of the index of refraction.
• Schlieren Systems: are used to indicate the variation of the first derivative of the index of refraction
1/ 0
vcn
shadowgraph depicting the flow generated by a bullet
at supersonic speeds. (by Andrew Davidhazy )
Schlieren images of the muzzle blast and
supersonic bullet from firing a .30-06 caliber
high-powered rifle (by Gary S. Settles )
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Visualization of a Schockwaves using Schlieren technique
Before turning on the Supersonic jet
After turning on the Supersonic jet
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Schlieren vs. Shadowgraph
Shadowgraph
• Displays a mere shadow
• Shows light ray displacement
• Contrast level responds to
• No knife edge used
Schlieren
• Displays a focused image
• Shows ray refraction angle, • Contrast level responds to
• Knife edge used for cutoff
yn
2
2
y
n
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV)
• To seed fluid flows with small tracer particles (~µm), and
assume the tracer particles moving with the same velocity as
the low fluid flows.
• To measure the displacements (L) of the tracer particles
between known time interval (t). The local velocity of fluid
flow is calculated by U= L/t .
A. t=t0 B. t=t0+10 s
Classic 2-D PIV measurement
C. Derived Velocity field X (mm)
Y(m
m)
-50 0 50 100 150
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
-0.9 -0.7 -0.5 -0.3 -0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9
5.0 m/sspanwisevorticity (1/s)
shadow region
GA(W)-1 airfoil
t=t0 t
LU
t= t0+t
L
• Advantage:
• Whole flow field measurements
• Non-intrusive measurements
• Disadvantage:
• Low temporal resolution
• Very expansive compared with
hotwire anemometers and pitot-
static probes.
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
PIV System Setup
Illumination system
(Laser and optics)
camera
Synchronizer
seed flow with
tracer particles
Host computer
Particle tracers: to track the fluid movement.
Illumination system: to illuminate the flow field in the interest region.
Camera: to capture the images of the particle tracers.
Synchronizer: the control the timing of the laser illumination and
camera acquisition.
Host computer: to store the particle images and conduct image processing.
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Advanced PIV techniques
Measurement region
80mm by 80mm
Laser sheet with P-polarization direction
Lobed nozzle
650mm
650mm
25 0
250
Synchronizer
cylinder lens
Host computer
high-resolution
CCD camera 3
Double-pulsed
Nd:YAG Laser set A
Polarizer cube
Polarizing beam splitter cubes
Mirror #3
Mirror #4
Half wave (/2) plateMirror #1
Mirror #2
high-resolution
CCD camera 1
Laser sheet with
S-polarization direction
S-polarized laser beamP-polarized
laser beam
high-resolution
CCD camera 2
high-resolution
CCD camera 4
Double-pulsed
Nd:YAG Laser set B
• Stereoscopic PIV technique
• Dual-plane stereoscopic PIV technique
• 3-D PTV technique
• Holograph PIV techniques
• Defocus PIV technique
Camera 1 Camera 2
Laser Sheet
1
2
Z
X
Stereo PIV technique
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Laminar Flows and Turbulent Flows
'';' wwwvvvuuu
...),,,(1 0
0
Tt
t
dttzyxuT
u
0'0';0' wvu
0)'(0)'(;0)'(1
)'( 2222
0
wvdtuT
u
Tt
t
o
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Boundary Layer Flow
y
Uu 99.0
, yat Displacement thickness:
Momentum thickness:
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Review of Quasi-1D Nozzle Flow
u
duM
A
dA)1( 2
M<1 M>1
Throat
M=1
u increasing
M>1 M<1
Throat
M=1
u decreasing
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
1st, 2nd and 3rd critic conditions
1st critic
condition
2st critic
condition
3st critic
condition
P0 in
crea
sin
g
P0 in
crea
sin
g
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Streamlines (experiment)
Lab #1: Flow visualization by using smoke wind tunnel
• Path line
• Streak lines
• Streamline
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
2
2
1*
*
VC
qC
ppp
T
EA
Test section
Contraction
section
A
E
V
Settling
chamber
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Linear curve fittingExperimental data
P = PA-P
E (Pa)
q =
0.5
*V
2
Lab#02: Wind Tunnel Calibration
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Lab #3: Pressure Sensor Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis
• Task #1: Pressure Sensor Calibration experiment
– A pressure sensor – Setra pressure transducer with a range of +/- 5 inH2O
• It has two pressure ports: one for total pressure and one for static (or reference) pressure.
– A computer data acquisition system to measure the output voltage from the manometer.
– A manometer of known accuracy
• Mensor Digital Pressure Gage, Model 2101, Range of +/- 10 inH2O
– A plenum and a hand pump to pressurize it.
– Tubing to connect pressure sensors and plenum
• Lab output:
– Calibration curve
– Repeatability of your results
– Uncertainty of your measurements
Setra pressure
transducer
(to be calibrated)
Mensor Digital
Pressure Gage A computer A plenum hand pump
tubing
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Lab#04 Measurements of Pressure Distributions around a Circular Cylinder
2
2
2
2
2
2
sin41)sin2(
1
1
2
1
V
V
V
V
V
PPCp
R
P
Incoming flow
X
Y
-3
-2
-1
0
1
0 100 200 300 400
Angle, Deg.
Cp
Cp distribution around a cylinder
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
theta (rad ) -->
cp
-->
EFD
CFD
AFD
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Lab#05: Airfoil Pressure Distribution Measurements
NACA0012 airfoil with 32 pressure tabs
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
CL=2
Experimental data
Angle of Attack (degrees)
Lift
Co
eff
icie
nt,
C
l
cV
LCl
2
2
1
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Experimental data
Angle of Attack (degrees)
Dra
g C
oe
ffic
ien
t,
Cd
cV
DCd
2
2
1
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
X (inches)
Y (
inch
es)
1
5 12 22
25 30 40
47
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
y
x 80 mm
Pressure rake with 41 total pressure probes
(the distance between the probes d=2mm)
Lab 06: Airfoil Wake Measurements and Hotwire Anemometer
Calibration
y
x
2
2
2
2
2
2
)])(
1()(
[2
2
1
)])(
1()(
[
2
1
dyU
yU
U
yU
CC
CU
dAU
yU
U
yUU
CU
DC
D
D
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Lab 07: Hot wire measurements in the wake of an airfoil y
x
80 mm
Pressure rake with 41 total pressure probes
(the distance between the probes d=2mm)
Hotwire probe
Test conditions:
Velocity: V=15 m/s
Angle of attack: AOA=0, and 12 deg.
Date sampling rate: f=1000Hz
Number of samples: 10,000 (10s in time)
No. of points: 20~25 points
Gap between points: ~0.2 inches
Lab#3
Lab#4
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Lab#08: Measurements of Boundary Layer over a Flat Plate
X
Y
Pitot rake
Displacement thickness:
Momentum thickness:
• To conduct velocity profile measurements at 10
downstream locations.
• To determine boundary layer thickness and drag
coefficient based on the velocity measurement
results.
LCd
2Drag coefficient:
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Lab#09: Visualization of Shockwaves using Schlieren technique
Under-
expanded
flow
Flow
close to
3rd critical
Over-
expanded
flow
2nd critical –
shock is at
nozzle exit
1st critical –
shock is
almost at the
nozzle throat.
Tank with compressed air Test section
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Lab#10: Set Up a Schlieren and/or Shadowgraph System to Visualize a
Thermal Plume
Point Source
Candle plume
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Tank with compressed air Test section
Lab#11: Pressure Measurements in a de Laval Nozzle
Tap No. Distance downstream of throat (inches) Area (Sq. inches)
1 -4.00 0.8002 -1.50 0.5293 -0.30 0.4804 -0.18 0.4785 0.00 0.4766 0.15 0.4977 0.30 0.5188 0.45 0.5399 0.60 0.56010 0.75 0.58111 0.90 0.59912 1.05 0.61613 1.20 0.62714 1.35 0.63215 1.45 0.634
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
X/C *100
Y/C
*10
0
-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
vort: -4.5 -3.5 -2.5 -1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5
shadow region
GA(W)-1 airfoil
25 m/s
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
CL=2
Experimental data
Angle of Attack (degrees)
Lift
Co
eff
icie
nt,
C
l
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Experimental data
Angle of Attack (degrees)
Dra
g C
oe
ffic
ien
t,
Cd
X/C *100
Y/C
*10
0
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
vort: -4.5 -3.5 -2.5 -1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5
shadow region
GA(W)-1 airfoil
25 m/s
Airfoil stall
Airfoil stall
Before stall
After stall
cV
DCd
2
2
1
cV
LCl
2
2
1
Lab#12: PIV measurements of the Unsteady Vortex Structures in the
Wake of an Airfoil
Copyright © by Dr. Hui Hu @ Iowa State University. All Rights Reserved!
Lab#13: Stereoscopic PIV technique and Applications
Camera 1 Camera 2
Laser Sheet
1
2
Z
X
Displacement vectors in left camera Displacement vectors in right camera
Stereo PIV technique
.deg0.5;000,52Re C
X/C =4.0
X pixel
Yp
ixe
l
0 500 1000 1500
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
X pixel
Yp
ixe
l
0 500 1000 1500
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200