34
Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Lecture 12: MOS Transistor Models Prof. Niknejad

Lecture 12: MOS Transistor Modelsee105/fa03/handouts/lectures/... · Current in transistor is very low until the gate ... Why Find an Incremental Model? Signals of interest in analog

  • Upload
    vuthien

  • View
    224

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12

Lecture 12: MOS Transistor Models

Prof. Niknejad

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Lecture Outline

� MOS Transistors (4.3 – 4.6)– I-V curve (Square-Law Model)

– Small Signal Model (Linear Model)

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Observed Behavior: ID-VGS

� Current zero for negative gate voltage� Current in transistor is very low until the gate

voltage crosses the threshold voltage of device (same threshold voltage as MOS capacitor)

� Current increases rapidly at first and then it finally reaches a point where it simply increases linearly

GSV

DSI

TV

GSV

DSIDSV

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Observed Behavior: ID-VDS

� For low values of drain voltage, the device is like a resistor

� As the voltage is increases, the resistance behaves non-linearly and the rate of increase of current slows

� Eventually the current stops growing and remains essentially constant (current source)

DSV

/DSI k

“constant” current

resistor region

non-linear resistor region

2GSV V=

3GSV V=

4GSV V=

GSV

DSIDSV

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

“Linear” Region Current

� If the gate is biased above threshold, the surface is inverted

� This inverted region forms a channel that connects the drain and gate

� If a drain voltage is applied positive, electrons will flow from source to drain

p-type

n+ n+p+

Inversion layer“channel”

GS TnV V>

100mVDSV ≈G

DS

NMOS

x

y

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

MOSFET: Variable Resistor

� Notice that in the linear region, the current is proportional to the voltage

� Can define a voltage-dependent resistor

� This is a nice variable resistor, electronically tunable!

( )DS n ox GS Tn DS

WI C V V V

Lµ= −

1( )

( )DS

eq GSDS n ox GS Tn

V L LR R V

I C V V W Wµ = = = −

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Finding ID = f (VGS, VDS)

� Approximate inversion charge QN(y): drain is higher than the source � less charge at drain end of channel

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Inversion Charge at Source/Drain

)()0()( LyQyQyQ NNN =+=≈

)()0( TnGSoxN VVCyQ −−== == )( LyQN

)( TnGDox VVC −−

DSGSGD VV −=

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Average Inversion Charge

� Charge at drain end is lower since field is lower

� Simple approximation: In reality we should integrate the total charge minus the bulk depletion charge across the channel

( ) ( )( )

2ox GS T ox GD T

N

C V V C V VQ y

− + −≈ −

Source End Drain End

( ) ( )( )

2ox GS T ox GS SD T

N

C V V C V V VQ y

− + − −≈ −

(2 2 )( ) ( )

2 2ox GS T ox SD DS

N ox GS T

C V V C V VQ y C V V

− −≈ − = − − −

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Drift Velocity and Drain Current

“Long-channel” assumption: use mobility to find v

( ) ( ) ( / ) n DSn n

Vv y E y V y

L

µµ µ= − ≈ − −∆ ∆ =

Substituting:

( )2

DS DSD N ox GS T

V VI WvQ W C V V

Lµ= − ≈ − −

( )2DS

D ox GS T DS

VWI C V V V

Lµ≈ − −

Inverted Parabolas

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Square-Law Characteristics

Boundary: what is ID,SAT?TRIODE REGION

SATURATION REGION

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

The Saturation Region

When VDS > VGS – VTn, there isn’t any inversioncharge at the drain … according to our simplistic model

Why do curvesflatten out?

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Square-Law Current in Saturation

Current stays at maximum (where VDS = VGS – VTn = VDS,SAT)

Measurement: ID increases slightly with increasing VDS

model with linear “fudge factor”

( )2DS

D ox GS T DS

VWI C V V V

Lµ= − −

, ( )( )2

GS TDS sat ox GS T GS T

V VWI C V V V V

Lµ −= − − −

2, ( )

2ox

DS sat GS T

CWI V V

L

µ= −

2, ( ) (1 )

2ox

DS sat GS T DS

CWI V V V

L

µ λ= − +

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Pinching the MOS Transistors

� When VDS > VDS,sat, the channel is “pinched” off at drain end (hence the name “pinch-off region”)

� Drain mobile charge goes to zero (region is depleted), the remaining elecricfield is dropped across this high-field depletion region

� As the drain voltage is increases further, the pinch off point moves back towards source

� Channel Length Modulation: The effective channel length is thus reduced � higher IDS

p-type

n+ n+p+

Pinch-Off Point

GS TnV V>

DSVG

DS

NMOS

Depletion RegionGS TnV V−

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Linear MOSFET Model

Channel (inversion) charge: neglect reduction at drain

Velocity saturation defines VDS,SAT = Esat L = constant

- vsat / µnDrain current:

)],()[(, TnGSoxsatNSATD VVCvWWvQI −−−=−=

|Esat| = 104 V/cm, L = 0.12 µm � VDS,SAT = 0.12 V!

)1)((, DSnTnGSoxsatSATD VVVWCvI λ+−=

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Why Find an Incremental Model?

� Signals of interest in analog ICs are often of the form:

Direct substitution into iD = f(vGS, vDS) is tedious AND doesn’t include charge-storage effects … pretty rough approximation

( ) ( )GS GS gsv t V v t= +

Fixed Bias Point Small Signal

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Which Operating Region?

3VGSV =

3VDSV =TRIODE

SAT

OFF

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Changing One Variable at a Time

Assumption: VDS > VDS,SAT = VGS – VTn (square law)

GSV

/DSI k

3VDSV =1VTV =

Square LawSaturation

Region

Linear TriodeRegion

Slope of Tangent: Incremental current increase

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

The Transconductance gm

Defined as the change in drain current due to a change in the gate-source voltage, with everything else constant

, ,

( )(1 )GS DS GS DS

D Dm ox GS T DS

GS GSV V V V

i i Wg C V V V

v v Lµ λ∆ ∂= = = − +

∆ ∂

2, ( ) (1 )

2ox

DS sat GS T DS

CWI V V V

L

µ λ= − +

( )m ox GS T

Wg C V V

Lµ= −

0≈

22DS

m ox ox DS

ox

IW Wg C C I

WL LCL

µ µµ

= =

2

( )DS

mGS T

Ig

V V=

Gate Bias

Drain Current Bias

Drain Current Bias and Gate Bias

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Output Resistance ro

Defined as the inverse of the change in drain current dueto a change in the drain-source voltage, with everythingelse constant

Non-Zero Slope

DSVδ

DSIδ

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Evaluating ro

1

,GS DS

Do

DS V V

ir

v

− ∂ = ∂

2( ) (1 )2

oxD GS T DS

CWi V V V

L

µ λ= − +

02

1

( )2

oxGS T

rCW

V VL

µ λ=

0

1

DS

rIλ

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Total Small Signal Current

( )DS DS dsi t I i= +

DS DSds gs ds

gs ds

i ii v v

v v

∂ ∂= +∂ ∂

1ds m gs ds

o

i g v vr

= +

TransconductanceConductance

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Putting Together a Circuit Model

1ds m gs ds

o

i g v vr

= +

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Role of the Substrate Potential

Need not be the source potential, but VB < VS

Effect: changes threshold voltage, which changes the drain current … substrate acts like a “backgate”

QBS

D

QBS

Dmb v

i

v

ig

∂∂=

∆∆=

Q = (VGS, VDS, VBS)

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Backgate Transconductance

Result:2 2

Tn mD Dmb

BS Tn BS BS pQ Q Q

V gi ig

v V v V

γφ

∂∂ ∂= = =∂ ∂ ∂ − −

( )0 2 2T T SB p pV V Vγ φ φ= + − − −

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Four-Terminal Small-Signal Model

1ds m gs mb bs ds

o

i g v g v vr

= + +

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

MOSFET Capacitances in Saturation

Gate-source capacitance: channel charge is not controlled by drain in saturation.

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Gate-Source Capacitance Cgs

Wedge-shaped charge in saturation � effective area is (2/3)WL(see H&S 4.5.4 for details)

ovoxgs CWLCC += )3/2(

Overlap capacitance along source edge of gate �

oxDov WCLC =

(Underestimate due to fringing fields)

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Gate-Drain Capacitance Cgd

Not due to change in inversion charge in channel

Overlap capacitance Cov between drain and sourceis Cgd

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Junction Capacitances

Drain and source diffusions have (different) junctioncapacitances since VSB and VDB = VSB + VDS aren’t the same

Complete model (without interconnects)

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

P-Channel MOSFET

Measurement of –IDp versus VSD, with VSG as a parameter:

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Square-Law PMOS Characteristics

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

Small-Signal PMOS Model

Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley

EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 12 Prof. A. Niknejad

MOSFET SPICE Model

Many “levels” … we will use the square-law “Level 1” model

See H&S 4.6 + Spice refs. on reserve for details.