Upload
doantuong
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Modern/Modernization/Modernity
modernizationan umbrella term for a series of interrelated and endless
intellectual,
political,
economic,
technological,
religious,
social, and
psychological revolutions.
Started in some European citiesThen diffused to the rest of EuropeEventually became a global phenomenon
Modern/Modernization/Modernity
modernizationan umbrella term for a series of interrelated and endless
intellectual,
political,
economic,
technological,
religious,
social, and
psychological revolutions.
Started in some European citiesThen diffused to the rest of EuropeEventually became a global phenomenon
Modernity is relative! The meaning changesfrom time to time and from place to place:
Every country is modern to some degree.
But yesterday’s modern is sometimes outmodedtoday.
Modernization is revolutionary! Values, technology, andorganization change in dramatic ways.
Slow modernization ↔ Successfulmodernization.
Over centuries rather than over generations...
Modernity is relative! The meaning changesfrom time to time and from place to place:
Every country is modern to some degree.
But yesterday’s modern is sometimes outmodedtoday.
Modernization is revolutionary! Values, technology, andorganization change in dramatic ways.
Slow modernization ↔ Successfulmodernization.
Over centuries rather than over generations...
Modernity is relative! The meaning changesfrom time to time and from place to place:
Every country is modern to some degree.
But yesterday’s modern is sometimes outmodedtoday.
Modernization is revolutionary! Values, technology, andorganization change in dramatic ways.
Slow modernization ↔ Successfulmodernization.
Over centuries rather than over generations...
Modernity is relative! The meaning changesfrom time to time and from place to place:
Every country is modern to some degree.
But yesterday’s modern is sometimes outmodedtoday.
Modernization is revolutionary! Values, technology, andorganization change in dramatic ways.
Slow modernization ↔ Successfulmodernization.
Over centuries rather than over generations...
Modernity ...
◮ a state of mind:Only modern minds can create modern worlds.
◮ a belief in humanity:
◮ Human reason — not a transcendent god — is the master ofhumanity’s fate.
◮ Individuals should freely pursue their material, emotional, andspiritual needs.
◮ a process of creative destruction:obsolete & functionless being discarded & replaced withsomething more appropriate & more modern.
Transitions from one “lifestyle” to another ...
◮ Hunting and GatheringUntil the last 7,000 years.
◮ Agricultural Life
◮ Domestication of plants and animals◮ First settled civilizations in Mesopotamia around 5,000 BC◮ Then a proliferation of various civilizations
◮ 15th century civilizations other than Christian Europe
◮ Ming China◮ Aztec Mexico◮ Inca Peru◮ Benin Africa◮ Mogul India◮ Ashikaga Japan◮ Ottoman Asia Minor
Transitions from one “lifestyle” to another ...
◮ Hunting and GatheringUntil the last 7,000 years.
◮ Agricultural Life
◮ Domestication of plants and animals◮ First settled civilizations in Mesopotamia around 5,000 BC◮ Then a proliferation of various civilizations
◮ 15th century civilizations other than Christian Europe
◮ Ming China◮ Aztec Mexico◮ Inca Peru◮ Benin Africa◮ Mogul India◮ Ashikaga Japan◮ Ottoman Asia Minor
◮ All of these non-European civilizations were ruled bycentralized bureaucracies and had achieved enormousadvances in technology, the arts, philosophy, and wealth.
◮ But none developed the related psychological, philosophical,and technological prerequisites for modernity andglobal conquest.
◮ Two serious candidates were China and the OttomanEmpire.
But let’s now go back to the issues of
power and politics:
◮ All of these non-European civilizations were ruled bycentralized bureaucracies and had achieved enormousadvances in technology, the arts, philosophy, and wealth.
◮ But none developed the related psychological, philosophical,and technological prerequisites for modernity andglobal conquest.
◮ Two serious candidates were China and the OttomanEmpire.
But let’s now go back to the issues of
power and politics:
◮ Every century, a country to shape international relationswith its own values
◮ In the 17th century, France (under Cardinal Richelieu)introduced the modern approach to international relations
◮ Great Britain in the 18th century exercised the balance ofpower and this dominated European diplomacy for 200 years
◮ The 20th century was an American one!
◮ US was pragmatic, interventionist and passionate aboutthe universality of its values
◮ Two attitudes: Perfecting democracy at home and crusadingfor its values around the world
◮ Every century, a country to shape international relationswith its own values
◮ In the 17th century, France (under Cardinal Richelieu)introduced the modern approach to international relations
◮ Great Britain in the 18th century exercised the balance ofpower and this dominated European diplomacy for 200 years
◮ The 20th century was an American one!
◮ US was pragmatic, interventionist and passionate aboutthe universality of its values
◮ Two attitudes: Perfecting democracy at home and crusadingfor its values around the world
◮ American values: highly influential after 1917
◮ Real victory: the collapse of the Soviet Russia
◮ New problem: A diversity of powerful nationalisms
◮ Neither isolation from the world nor dominating it
◮ New idea: equilibrium (or the balance of power)
The Balance of Power
◮ Not a regularity until modernity
◮ Successful examples:◮ city-states of Ancient Greece and Renaissance Italy◮ the European state system after 1648
(the Peace of Westphalia)
◮ But these required◮ a number of states with almost equal levels of power◮ a guiding principle of world order.
◮ Enlightenment Ideal: invisible hand, the separation ofpowers, checks and balances, etc.
◮ American values: highly influential after 1917
◮ Real victory: the collapse of the Soviet Russia
◮ New problem: A diversity of powerful nationalisms
◮ Neither isolation from the world nor dominating it
◮ New idea: equilibrium (or the balance of power)
The Balance of Power
◮ Not a regularity until modernity
◮ Successful examples:◮ city-states of Ancient Greece and Renaissance Italy◮ the European state system after 1648
(the Peace of Westphalia)
◮ But these required◮ a number of states with almost equal levels of power◮ a guiding principle of world order.
◮ Enlightenment Ideal: invisible hand, the separation ofpowers, checks and balances, etc.
Europe’s “Modern” Balance of Power
◮ 1815 (the Congress of Vienna)
◮ After the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars
◮ Rising conflict toward the end of the 19th century
◮ And (partial!) conflict resolution with World War I
For several reasons...
◮ Another conflict resolution was necessary: World War II
◮ US not getting into the game of balanced power (the onlycandidate “to fight” the Soviet Russia)
◮ The Cold War was the new regime of two-polar world.
◮ The Soviet Russia was a big military power but eventuallycollapsed because of its social and economic crises.
◮ The Current Dilemma: Between fragmentation &globalization
Europe’s “Modern” Balance of Power
◮ 1815 (the Congress of Vienna)
◮ After the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars
◮ Rising conflict toward the end of the 19th century
◮ And (partial!) conflict resolution with World War I
For several reasons...
◮ Another conflict resolution was necessary: World War II
◮ US not getting into the game of balanced power (the onlycandidate “to fight” the Soviet Russia)
◮ The Cold War was the new regime of two-polar world.
◮ The Soviet Russia was a big military power but eventuallycollapsed because of its social and economic crises.
◮ The Current Dilemma: Between fragmentation &globalization