Upload
maheshj90
View
260
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
19 May 2010
Turbulence Modeling
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
1
19 May 2010
Outline1. Characteristics of turbulence 2. Approaches to predicting turbulent flows 3. Reynolds averaging4. RANS equations and unknowns5. The Reynolds-Stress Equations6. The closure problem of turbulence7. Characteristics of wall-bound turbulent flows8. Turbulence models and ranges of applicability
7.1. RANS7.2. LES/DES7.3. DNS
9. Example: diffuser
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
2
19 May 2010
Characteristics of turbulence • Randomness and fluctuation:
• Nonlinearity: Reynolds stresses from the nonlinear convective terms
• Diffusion: enhanced diffusion of momentum, energy etc.
• Vorticity/eddies/energy cascade: vortex stretching
u U u′= +
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
3
19 May 2010
•Dissipation: occurs at smallest scales •Three-dimensional: fluctuations are always 3D •Coherent structures: responsible for a large part of the mixing •A broad range of length and time scales: makingDNS very difficult
Characteristics of turbulence
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
4
19 May 2010
Approaches to predicting turbulent flows• AFD, EFD and CFD:
– AFD: No analytical solutions exist – EFD: Expensive, time-consuming, and sometimes impossible
(e.g. fluctuating pressure within a flow) – CFD: Promising, the need for turbulence modeling
• Another classification scheme for the approaches– The use of correlations:– Integral equations: reduce PDE to ODE for simple cases – One-point closure: RANS equations + turbulent models – Two-point closure: rarely used, FFT of Two-point equations – LES: solve for large eddies while model small eddies – DNS: solve NS equations directly without any model
( )ReDC f=
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
5
19 May 2010
Deeper insights on RANS/URANS/LES
RANS
URANS
LES
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
6
19 May 2010
Reynolds Averaging
• Time averaging: for stationary turbulence
• Spatial averaging: for homogenous turbulence
• Ensemble averaging: for any turbulence
• Phase averaging: for turbulence with periodic motion
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
7
19 May 2010
• RANS equation
• RANS equation in conservative form
• Numbers of unknowns and equations–Unknowns: 10= P (1) + U (3) + (6) –Equations: 4 = Continuity (1) + Momentum (3)
RANS equations and unknowns
( )2i ij ji
jj i
i j
U U PU S
t xu u
x xρ ρ µ ρ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+ = − +
∂ ∂ ∂′ ′−
∂
( ) ( )2ij i ji
j i jj i
U PU U S
t xu
x xuρ ρ µ′ ′∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+ + = − +
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
( )i ju u′ ′−
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
8
19 May 2010 9
The Reynolds-Stress Equation•Derivation: Taking moments of the NS equation.Multiply the NS equation by a fluctuating property and time average the product. Using this procedure, one can derive a differential equation for the Reynolds-stress tensor.
2ij ij j ik ik jk
k k k
ji
k k
uu
x x
U UU
t x x x
τ ττ τ ν
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+ = − −′
+∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
∂′∂∂ ∂
jii j k
j
ij
ki k
uu p pu u u
x x x xν
ρ ρτ ∂ ∂+ + +
′′ ′ ′∂ ∂ ′ ′ ′∂ ∂
+∂ ∂
•NEW Equations: 6 = 6 equation for the Reynolds stress tensor •NEW Unknowns: 22= 6 + 6 + 10
2 6ji
k k
uuunkowns
x xν
′∂′∂ →∂ ∂
6ji
j i
uu p punkowns
x xρ ρ ′′ ′ ′∂ ∂+ → ∂ ∂
10i j ku u u unkowns′ ′ ′→
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
9
19 May 2010
The closure problem of turbulence• Because of the non-linearity of the Navier-
Stokes equation, as we take higher and higher moments, we generate additional unknowns at each level.
• In essence, Reynolds averagingis a brutal simplification that loses much of the informationcontained in the Navier-Stokes equation.
• The function of turbulence modelingis to devise approximations for the unknown correlationsin terms of flow properties that are known so that a sufficient number of equations exist.
• In making such approximations, we close the system.
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
10
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (RANS) • Boussinesq eddy-viscosity approximation• Algebraic (zero-equation) models
– Mixing length – Cebeci-Smith Model – Baldwin-Lomax Model
• One-equation models– Baldwin-Barth model – Spalart-Allmaras model
• Two-equation models – k-ε model – k-ω model
• Four-equation (v2f) models • Reynolds-stress (seven-equation) models
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
11
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (RANS)
2
3j
Ti
i j ijj i
UUu u
x xkδν
∂∂′ ′− = + − ∂ ∂
• Boussinesq eddy-viscosity approximation
• Dimensional analysis shows: , where q is a turbulence velocity scale and L is a turbulence length scale. Usually where is the turbulent kinetic energy. Models that do not provide a length scale are called incomplete.
T C qLµν =
2q k=1
2 i ik u u′ ′=
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
12
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (0-eqn RANS)
• Mixing length model: 2T mix
dUl
dyν =
• Assume for free shear flow, then( )mixl xαδ=
α=0.180 for far wake
α=0.071 for mixing layer
α=0.098 for plane jet
α=0.080 for round jet • Comments:
Reliable only for free shear flows with different α values
Not applicable to wall-bounded flows
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
13
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (0-eqn RANS) Cebeci-Smith Model (Two-layer model)
,i
o
T m
TT m
y y
y y
νν
ν≤= >
Where is the smallest value of for my yi oT Tν ν=
Closure coefficients:
Outer layer:
Inner layer:1 22 2
2
iT mix
U Vl
y xν
∂ ∂ = + ∂ ∂
01 y Amixl y eκ
+ +− = −
( )0
* ;T e v KlebU F yν α δ δ=
0.40κ = 0.0168α =1 2
226 1
dP dxA y
Uτρ
−+
= +
( )16
; 1 5.5Kleb
yF y δ
δ
− = +
( )*
01v eU U dy
δδ = −∫Comments:
Three key modifications to mixing length model; Applicable to wall-bounded flows;Applicable to 2D flows only;Not reliable for separated flows;
difficult to determine in some cases;*, ,v eUδ δ
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
14
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (0-eqn RANS) Baldwin-Lomax Model (Two-layer model)
,i
o
T m
TT m
y y
y y
νν
ν≤= >
Where is the smallest value of for my yi oT Tν ν=
Closure coefficients:
Outer layer:
Inner layer:
Comments:
Applicable to 3D flows;Not reliable for separated flows; No need to determine *, ,v eUδ δ
2
iT mixlν ω= 01 y Amixl y eκ
+ +− = −
( )0 max;T cp wake Kleb KlebC F F y y Cν α=
0.40κ = 0.0168α = 26A+ = 1.6cpC = 0.3KlebC = 1wkC =
( )16
maxmax
; 1 5.5Kleb KlebKleb
yF y y C
y C
− = +
1 22 2 2V U W V U W
x y y z z xω
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ = − + − + − ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
15
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (1-eqn RANS) Baldwin-Barth model
Kinematic eddy viscosity :
Turbulence Reynolds number :
Closure coefficients and auxiliary relations:
1 2T TC R D Dµν ν= %
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )2
2 2 1
1T T T
j Tk
TT
kT
k kj
R R RU C f C R P
t x x
R
x x xεε ε ε
νν ν νν ν ν σ ν
σ∂ ∂ ∂
+ = − + +∂
−∂
∂∂ ∂∂ ∂∂
% % %
%
%
1 1.2Cε = 2 2.0Cε = 0.09Cµ = 0 26A+ = 2 10A+ = ( )1 2 2
1 CC C µ
ε εεσ κ
= − 0.41κ =
2
3ji i k k
Tj i j k k
UU U U UP
x x x x xν
∂∂ ∂ ∂ ∂= + − ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
01 1 y AD e
+ +−= − 22 1 y AD e
+ +−= −
0 21 1 2 12 1 2 1 2
2 2 0 21 2
1 11 y A y AC C D D
f D D D D e eC C y A AD D
ε ε
ε ε κ+ + + +− −
+ + +
= + − + ⋅ + +
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
16
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (1-eqn RANS) Spalart-Allmaras model
Kinematic eddy viscosity :
Eddy viscosity equation:
Closure coefficients and auxiliary relations:
1T vfν ν= %
( )2
11 1
1 bj b w w
j kk kk
cU c S c f
t x d xx x x
νν νσ
ν ν ν ν ννσ
∂ ∂+ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ + = − + + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂∂ ∂
% % % % %% %
%%
1 0.1355bc = 2 0.622bc = 1 7.1vc = 2 3σ = ( )211 2
1 bbw
ccc
κ σ+
= +
2 0.3wc = 2 2.0wc = 0.41κ =
3
1 3 31
vv
fc
χχ
=+ 2
1
11v
v
ff
χχ
= −+
1 663
6 63
1 ww
w
cf g
g c
+= +
νχν
=% ( )6
2wg r c r r= + − 2 2r
S d
νκ
=%
%
22 2 vS S fd
νκ
= +%
% 2 ij ijS = Ω Ω
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
17
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (1-eqn RANS)
Comments on one-equation models:1.One-equation models based on turbulence kinetic energy are incompleteas
they relate the turbulence length scales to some typical flow dimension. They are rarely used.
2.One-equation models based on an equation for the eddy viscosity are completesuch as Baldwin-Barth model and Spalart-Allmaras model.
3.They circumvent the need to specify a dissipation length by expressing the decay, or dissipation, of the eddy viscosity in terms of spatial gradients.
4 Spalart-Allmaras model can predicts better results than Baldwin-Barth model, and much better results for separated flow than Baldwin-Barth model and algebraic models.
5 Also most of DES simulations are based on the Spalart-Allmaras model.
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
18
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (2-eqn RANS) k-ε model:
2T C kµν ε=
( )ij ij T k
j j j j
Uk k kU
t x x x xτ ε ν ν σ
∂∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+ = − + + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
( )2
1 2i
j ij Tj j j j
UU C C
t x k x k x xε ε εε ε ε ε ετ ν ν σ
∂∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+ = − + + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
1 1.44Cε =2 1.92Cε = 0.09Cµ = 1.0kσ = 1.3εσ =
,
,
,
,
k-ω model:( )C kµω ε= 3 2l C kµ ε=
T kν ω=
( )* *ij ij T
j j j j
Uk k kU k
t x x x xτ β ω ν σ ν
∂∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+ = − + + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
( )2ij ij T
j j j j
UU
t x k x x x
ω ω ω ωα τ βω ν σν ∂∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+ = − + + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
13
25α =
0 fββ β= ** *
0 fβ
β β= 1
2σ = * 1
2σ = 0
9
125β = 1 70
1 80f ω
βω
χχ
+=+
( )3*0
ij jk kiSωχ
β ω
Ω Ω= *
0
9
100β = *
2
2
1, 0
1 6800
1 400
k
kk
k
fβ
χχ χχ
≤= + > +
3
1k
j j
k
x x
ωχω
∂ ∂=∂ ∂
* kε β ω= 1 2l k ω=
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
19
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (2-eqn RANS)
,
Comments on two-equation models:1. Two-equation models are complete;2. k-ε and k-ω models are the most widely used two-
equation models and a lot of versions exist. For example, a popular variant of k-ω model introduced by Menter has been used in our research code CFDSHIP-IOWA. There are also a lot of low-Reynolds-number versions with different damping functions.
3. k-ω model shows better results than k-ε model for flows with adverse pressure gradient and separated flows as well as better numerical stability.
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
20
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (4-eqn RANS) v2f-kε model:
,
,
,
,
v2f-kω model:
2T C v Tµν =
( )2 2 2
tj j
Dv v vkf
Dt k x xε ν ν
∂ ∂= − + + ∂ ∂
22 2 1
2
2
3kPC v
L f f CT k k
∇ − = − −
t
j k j
Dk kP
Dt x x
νε νσ
∂ ∂= − + + ∂ ∂
2
1 2t
j j
DC P C
Dt k k x xε εε
νε ε ε ενσ
∂ ∂= − + + ∂ ∂
1 0.4C = 2 0.3C = 0.3LC = 70Cη = 2 1.9Cε = 1.0εσ =( )
42
1 1.3 0.25 1 2LC C d Lε = + + max ,6
kT
νε ε =
1 43 2 3
max ,L
kL C Cη
νε ε
=
12
nn
T C k vµν ω−
=
( )2 2
26 tj j
Dv vkf v
Dt k x x
ε ν ν ∂ ∂= − + +
∂ ∂ ( )
2 22 2
1 2
1 2 11 5
3kPv v
L f C CT k T k k
′∇ − = − − − −
*i tij
j j k j
UDk kk
Dt x x x
ντ β ω νσ
∂ ∂ ∂= − + + ∂ ∂ ∂
12
2
n
i tij
j j j
UD v
Dt k x k x xω
νω ω ωα τ βω νσ
− ∂ ∂ ∂= − + + ∂ ∂ ∂
0.45977α = * 0.09β = 3 40β = 1.0kσ = 1.5ωσ =
max ,6k
Tν
ε ε =
1 43 2 3
max ,L
kL C Cη
νε ε
=
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
21
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (4-eqn RANS)
,
Comments on four-equation models:1. For two-equation models a major problem is that it is hard to
specify the proper conditions to be applied near walls. 2. Durbin suggested that the problem is that the Reynolds number is
low near a wall and that the impermeability condition (zero normal velocity) is far more important. That is the motivation for the equation for the normal velocity fluctuation.
3. It was found that the model also required a damping function f, hence the name v2f model.
4. They appear to give improved results at essentially the same cost
as the k-ε and k-ω models especially for separated flows. Hopefully the
v2f-kω model can have better numerical stability than v2f-kε model as their counterparts behave in two-equation models.
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
22
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (7-eqn RANS) Some of the most noteworthy types of applications for which models based on the Boussinesq approximation fail are:
1. Flows with sudden changes in mean strain rate2. Flow over curved surfaces3. Flow in ducts with secondary motions4. Flow in rotating fluids5. Three-dimensional flows6. Flows with boundary-layer separation
In Reynolds-stress models, the equations for the Reynolds stress
tensor are modeled and solved along with the ε-equation:
2ij ij j ijik ik jk
k
j ji ii j k
k k jk kik k
u uu u p pu
U UU
t x xu
xu
x x x x x x
τ τ ττ ν
ρ ρτ ν
′ ′∂′ ′ ′ ′∂ ∂ ∂ ′ ′ ′+∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+ = − − + + + + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
23
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (7-eqn RANS) These are some versions of Reynolds stress models:
1. LRR rapid pressure-strain model 2. Lumley pressure-strain model3. SSG pressure-strain model 4. Wilcox stress- model
Comments on Reynolds stress models:1.Reynolds stress models require the solution of seven additional
PDEsand those equation are even harder to solve than the two-equation models.
2. Although Reynolds stress models have greater potential to represent turbulent flow more correctly, their success so far has been moderate.
3. There is a lot of current research in this field, and new models are often proposed. Which model is best for which kind of flow is not clear due to the fact that in many attempts to answer this question numerical errors were too large to allow clear conclusions to be reached.
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
24
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (LES)
• Large scale motions are generally much more energetic than the small scale ones.
• The size and strength of large scale motions make them to be the most effective transporters of the conserved properties.
• LES treats the large eddies more exactly than the small ones may make sense
• LES is 3D, time dependent and expensive but much less costly than DNS.
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
25
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (LES, Scale-similarity model and Dynamic model)
• Dynamic model: 1. filtered LES solutions can be filtered again using a filter broader than the previous filter to obtain a very large scale field.2. An effective subgrid-scale field can be obtained by subtraction of the two fields.3. model parameter can then be computed.Advantages: 1. model parameter computed at every spatial grid point and every time step from the results of LES2. Self-consistent subgrid-scale model3. Automatically change the parameter near the wall and in shear flowsDisadvantages: backscatter (eddy viscosity<0) may cause instability.
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
26
19 May 2010
Turbulent models (DES)
• Massively separated flows at high Re usually involveboth large and small scale vortical structures and verythin turbulent boundary layer near the wall
• RANS approaches are efficient inside the boundarylayer but predict very excessive diffusion in the separatedregions
• LES is accurate in the separated regions but is unaffordablefor resolving thin near-wall turbulent boundary layers atindustrial Reynolds numbers
• Motivation for DES: combination of LES and RANS. RANSinside attached boundary layer and LES in the separatedregions
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
27
19 May 2010
DES Formulation
* 3 2
3 2
/kRANS k
kDES
D k k l
kDl
ωρβ ω ρ
ρ−= =
=%
• Modification to RANS models was straightforward by substituting the length scale , which is the distance to the closest wall, with the new DES length scale, defined as:
• where is the DES constant, is the grid spacing and is based on the largest dimensions of the local grid cell, and are the grid spacing in x, y and z coordinates respectively• Applying the above modification will result in S-A Based, standard k-ε (or k-ω) based and Menter’s SST based DES models, etc.
l%
min( , )w DESl d C= ∆% max( , , )x y zδ δ δ∆ =
wd
DESC ∆, ,x y zδ δ δ
1 2 *( )
min( , )
k
k DES
l k
l l C
ω
ω
β ω−
−
=
= ∆%
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
28
19 May 2010
Resolved/Modeled/Total Reynolds stress (DES)
TKE
Resolved
Modeled
Total
Modeled Reynolds stress:
∂∂+
∂∂−=
x
v
y
uvu tν''
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
29
19 May 2010
Resolved/Modeled/Total Reynolds stress (URANS)
Modeled
Resolved
Total
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
30
19 May 2010
Deep insight into RANS/DES (Point oscillation on free surface with power spectral analysis)
EFD DES URANS
2HZ
-5/3
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
31
19 May 2010
Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS)• DNS isto solve the Navier-Stokes equation directly without
averaging or approximation other than numerical discretizations whose errors can be estimated (V&V) and controlled.
• The domainof DNS must be at least as large as the physical domain or the largest turbulent eddy (scale L)
• The size of the gridmust be no larger than a viscously determined scale, Kolmogoroff scale, η
• The number of grid pointsin each direction must be at least L/ η
• The computational cost is proportional to
• Provide detailed information on flow field• Due to the computational cost, DNS is more likely to be a
research tool, not a design tool.
( ) 434/3 Re01.0Re ≈L
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
32
19 May 2010
Examples (Diffuser)
• Mean velocity predicted by V2f agreed very well with EFD data, particular the separation region is captured.
• K-ε model fails to predict the separation caused by adverse pressure gradient.
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
33
19 May 2010
Examples (Diffuser)
• TKE predicted by V2f agreed better with EFD data than k-ε model, particular the asymmetric distribution.
• Right column is for the skin friction coefficient on the lower wall, from which the separation and reattachment point can be found.
v2f
k-ε
2x/H
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
34
19 May 2010
References
1. J. H. Ferziger, M. Peric, “Computational Methods for FluidDynamics,” 3rd edition, Springer, 2002.
2. D. C. Wilcox, “Turbulence Modeling for CFD”, 1998.3. S.B.Pope, “Turbulent Flows,” Cambridge, 20004. P. A. Durbin and B. A. Pettersson Reif, “Statistical Theory and
Modeling for Turbulent Flows,” John Wiley & Sons, LTD, 2001.5. P.A. Davidson, “Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists
and Engineers,” Oxford, 2004.
Lecture # 05 Turbulence Modelling
JetWings
35