Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    1/88

    Territory in

    International Law

    Law 111 Public International Law

    Atty. GILBERT R. HUFANAProfessor

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    2/88

    Territory

    the fixed and permanent portion on theearths surface inhabited by the people of

    the state and over which it has supremeauthority

    consists of the portion of the surface of the

    globe on which that State settles and overwhich it has supreme authority

    an exercise of sovereignty, covering notonly land, but also the atmosphere as well

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    3/88

    Characteristics

    Permanent

    Definite/Indicated with Precision

    Generally, the territorys limits define theStates jurisdiction

    Big enough to sustain the population

    Not so extensive as to be difficult to:Administer; and

    Defend from external aggression

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    4/88

    Modes of Acquisition of Territory

    By Original Title

    Discovery and Occupation

    Accretion By Derivative Title

    Prescription

    Cession Conquest/Subjugation

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    5/88

    Modes of Acquisition of Territory

    Other Modes

    Dereliction/Abandonment

    Erosion Revolution

    Natural Causes

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    6/88

    Discovery and Occupation

    An original mode of acquisition of territorybelonging to no oneterra nullius

    land to be acquired must be terra nullius

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    7/88

    Discovery and Occupation

    2 Requisites: Doctrine of Effective Occupation

    Discovery/Possession

    Mere discovery gives only an Inchoate Right ofDiscovery

    Once the discovering state begins exercisingsovereign rights over the territory, the inchoate rightripens and is perfected into a full title

    Effective Occupation

    Does not necessarily require continuous display ofauthority in every part of the territory claimed

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    8/88

    Prescription

    acquisition of territory by an averseholding continued through a long term of

    years derivative mode of acquisition by which

    territory belonging to 1 State is transferred

    to the sovereignty of another State byreason of the adverse and uninterruptedpossession thereof by the latter for asufficiently long period of time

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    9/88

    Prescription

    2 REQUISITES

    continuous and undisturbed possession

    lapse of a period of time No rule as to length of time required

    Question of fact

    Q: What is the source of this right? A:Roman principle of usucapio (long

    continued use of real property ripened into

    ownership)

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    10/88

    Cession

    a derivative mode of acquisition by whichterritory belonging to 1 State is transferred to thesovereignty of another State in accordance with

    an agreement between them

    a bilateral agreement whereby one Statetransfers sovereignty over a definite portion of

    territory to another State E.g. Treaty of cession (maybe an outcome of

    peaceful negotiations [voluntary] or the result ofwar[forced])

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    11/88

    Conquest

    derivative mode of acquisition whereby theterritory of 1 State is conquered in the courseof war and thereafter annexed to and placedunder the sovereignty of the conquering State

    the taking possession of hostile territorythrough military force in time of war and by

    which the victorious belligerent compels theenemy to surrender sovereignty of thatterritory thus occupied

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    12/88

    Conquest

    acquisition of territory by force of arms

    however, conquest alone merely gives an

    inchoate right; acquisition must be completedby formal act of annexation

    no longer regarded as lawful

    UN Charter prohibits resort to threat or use offorce against a States territorial integrity orpolitical independence

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    13/88

    Military Belligerent Occupation

    Not equivalent to conquest

    Act whereby a military commander in the

    course of war gains effective possessionof an enemy territory

    By itself, does not effect an acquisition of

    territory

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    14/88

    Accretion

    the increase in the land area of a Statecaused by the operation of the forces of

    nature, or artificially, through human labor Accessio cedat principali (accessory

    follows the principal) is the rule which, in

    general, governs all the forms of accretion. Examples:

    Reclamation projects in Manila Bay

    Polders of the Netherlands

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    15/88

    What comprises a territory?

    Territorial Domain (Land mass)

    Internal Waters

    Maritime and Fluvial Domain Aerial Domain

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    16/88

    What comprises a territory?

    1. TERRITORIAL DOMAIN

    The landmass where the people live

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    17/88

    The Philippine Territory(1987 Constitution)

    Article I. National Territory The national territory comprises the Philippine

    archipelago, with all the islands and waters

    embraced therein, and all other territories over

    which the Philippines has sovereignty or

    jurisdiction, consisting of its terrestrial, fluvial, and

    aerial domains, including its territorial sea, the

    seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and othersubmarine areas. The waters around, between,

    and connecting the islands of the archipelago,

    regardless of their breadth and dimensions, form

    part of the internal waters of the Philippines.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    18/88

    The Philippine TerritorialDomain

    The Philippine Archipelago is considered as aSingle Territorial Entity

    Basis:

    1. Treaty of Paris - Between Spain and the U.S.,signed in Paris on December 10, 1898

    2. Treaty Between Spain and the U.S. for theCession of Outlying Islands of the Philippines,signed in Washington on November 7, 1900

    3. Convention Between the U.S. and Great BritainDelimiting the Philippine Archipelago and the Stateof Borneo, signed in Washington on January 2,

    1930

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    19/88

    Treaty of Paris

    transferred Philippine sovereignty from Spain tothe U.S. upon payment of twenty million dollars($20,000,000) within three months after treaty

    ratification

    The boundaries of the Philippine archipelagodefined in Article III of the Treaty of Paris of

    1898did not inc lude

    two small islands: Sibutuat the extreme southwest of the Sulu grouptoward Borneo and Kagayan de Sulu, lyingnorthwest of Jolo and of some strategic value

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    20/88

    The Cession Treaty of 1900

    Spain relinquishes to the U.S. all title and claim

    of title, which she may have had at the time of

    the conclusion of the Treaty of Paris, to any and

    all islands belonging to the PhilippineArchipelago, lying outside the lines described in

    Article III of that Treaty and particularly to the

    islands of Cagayan, Sulu and Sibutu and theirdependencies, and agrees that all such islands

    shall be comprehended in the cession of the

    Archipelago as fully as if they had been included

    within those lines.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    21/88

    The Boundaries Treaty of 1930

    clarifies those islands in the region belonging toU.S. and those to the State of North Borneo anddelimits the boundary between the Philippine

    Archipelago (under U.S. sovereignty) and theState of North Borneo (under British protection)

    solely focused on the status of the Turtle Islands

    and the Mangsee Islands sovereignty over these islands was transferred

    to the U.S.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    22/88

    The

    PhilippineTerritorialDomain

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    23/88

    The Philippine TerritorialDomain

    Turtle

    Islands

    Cagayan

    de Sulu

    Sibutu

    Mangsee

    Islands

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    24/88

    Territories claimed by thePhilippines

    Spratlys Islands

    Sabah (North Borneo)

    Scarborough Shoal

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    25/88

    The Spratlys

    a disputed group of more than 750 reefs, islets,atolls, cays, and islands in the South China Sea

    States staking claims to various islands are:Brunei, China (People's Republic of China),Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan (Republic ofChina), and Vietnam

    the Spratly area holds significant reserves of oiland natural gas, it is a productive area for worldfishing and commercial shipping, and coastalcountries would get an extended continental

    shelf

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    26/88

    Where is Spratlys?

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    27/88

    The Philippine Claim overSpratlys

    The Philippines base their claims of sovereigntyover the Spratlys on the issues ofRes nulliusand geography

    no effective sovereignty over the islands until the1930s when France and then Japan acquired theislands

    When Japan renounced their sovereignty over the

    islands according to the San Francisco Treaty, therewas a relinquishment of the right to the islandswithout any special beneficiary. Therefore, argue thePhilippines, the islands became Res nullius and

    available for annexation

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    28/88

    The Philippine Claim overSpratlys

    In 1956, a private Filipino citizen, Tomas Cloma,unilaterally declared a state on 53 features in theSouth China Sea, calling it "Freedomland

    On June 11, 1978, President Ferdinand Marcosof the Philippines issued Presidential decree No.1596, declaring the Spratly Islands (referred to

    therein as the Kalayaan Island Group) asPhilippine territory.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    29/88

    The Philippine Claim overSpratlys

    On the basis of geography

    Kalayaan is distinct from other island groupsin the South China Sea, because of the sizeof the biggest island in the Kalayaan group

    all the islands claimed by the Philippines liewithin its 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zone

    according to the 1982 United NationsConvention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    30/88

    Current State of Spratlys

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    31/88

    The Sabah (North Borneo)Dispute

    the territorial dispute between Malaysia and thePhilippines over much of the eastern part ofSabah

    The Philippines, presenting itself as thesuccessor state of the Sultanate of Sulu, retainsa "dormant claim" on Sabah on the basis that

    the territory was only leased to the British NorthBorneo Company in 1878, with the sovereigntyof the Sultanate (and subsequently theRepublic) over the territory never having been

    relinquished.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    32/88

    The Sabah (North Borneo)Dispute

    The Sultanate of Sulu was granted the north-eastern part of the territory as a prize for helpingthe Sultan of Brunei against his enemies and

    from then on that part of Borneo was recognizedas part of the Sultan of Sulu's sovereignty.

    In 1878, the Sultanate leased such territory to

    the British North Borneo Company The 1878 cession/rental payment was continued

    until the independence and formation of theMalaysian federation in 1963

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    33/88

    The Sabah (North Borneo)Dispute

    As of 2004, the Malaysian Embassy to thePhilippines had been paying cession/rentalmoney amounting to US$1,500 per year to the

    heirs of the Sultanate of Sulu The Sultan of Sulu relinquished the sovereign

    rights over all his possessions in favor of Spain,

    based on Bases of Peace and Capitulationsigned by Sultan of Sulu and Spain in Jolo on 22July 1878

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    34/88

    The Sabah (North Borneo)Dispute

    In 1885, Spain relinquished all of its claim toBorneo to the United Kingdom of Great Britainand Ireland in the Madrid Protocol of 1885

    In spite of that, in 1906 and 1920 the US, whichby then colonized the Philippines, formallyreminded the UK that Sabah belonged not to

    them but to the Sultanate of Sulu.

    America posited the claim on the premise that Spainnever had acquired sovereignty over North Borneo,and thus did not have the right to transfer claims ofsovereignty over North Borneo to UK in the MadridProtocol of 1885

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    35/88

    The Sabah (North Borneo)Dispute

    On 12 September 1962, the territory of NorthBorneo, and the full sovereignty, title anddominion over it were ceded by then reigning

    Sultan of Sulu, Muhammad Esmail E. Kiram I, tothe Philippines.

    The cession effectively gave the Philippinegovernment the full authority to pursue their claim in

    international courts.

    To date, Malaysia continues to consistentlyreject Philippine calls to resolve the matter of

    Sabah's jurisdiction to the International Court ofJustice.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    36/88

    The 2013 Standoff

    On February 11, 2013, a group of approximately100200 individuals, some of them armed,arrived by boat in Lahad Datu, Sabah from

    Simunul island, Tawi-Tawi of southernPhilippines.

    They were sent by Jamalul Kiram III, one of the

    claimants to the throne of the Sultanate of Sulu. Their objective was to assert their unresolved

    territorial claim to North Borneo.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    37/88

    Scarborough Shoal

    Other names: ScarboroughReef, HuangyanIsland, BajodeMasinloc or PanatagShoal

    a group of islands, atolls, and reefs than a shoal,

    is located in the South China Sea.

    The nearest landmass is Palauig town,Zambales province, Luzon Island, at 221

    kilometers, about 123 miles west of Subic Bay.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    38/88

    Scarborough Shoal

    The Scarborough Shoal is not includedwithin the territorial lines defined in the

    Treaty of Paris (1898),The CessionTreaty(1900), The 1930 Boundary Treaty,1935 Constitution of the Philippines,

    Republic Act No. 3046 "Act to Define the

    Baselines of the Territorial Sea of thePhilippines"(1961), or the 1987Constitution of the Philippines.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    39/88

    Scarborough Shoal

    ScarboroughShoal

    Phili i Cl i h

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    40/88

    Philippine Claim on theScarborough Shoal

    the Philippine DFA has asserted that the countryexercised both effective occupation and effective

    jurisdiction over Bajo de Masinloc since its

    independence erected flags in some islands and a lighthouse which

    it reported to the International Maritime Organization

    It also asserts that the Philippine and US Naval

    Forces have used it as impact range and that itsDENR has conducted scientific, topographic andmarine studies in the shoal, while Filipino fishermenregularly use it as fishing ground and have always

    considered it their own

    Phili i Cl i th

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    41/88

    Philippine Claim on theScarborough Shoal

    The DFA also claims that the name Bajo deMasinlocitself identifies the shoal as a particularpolitical subdivision of the Philippine Province of

    Zambales, known as Masinloc. It also asserts that there is no indication that the

    international community has acquiesced toChina's historical claim, and that the activity offishing of private Chinese individuals, claimed tobe a traditional exercise among these waters,does not constitute a sovereign act of the

    Chinese State.

    Phili i Cl i th

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    42/88

    Philippine Claim on theScarborough Shoal

    The Philippine government argues that since thelegal basis of its claim is based on theinternational law on acquisition of sovereignty,

    the EEZ claim on the waters aroundScarborough is different from the sovereigntyexercised by the Philippines in the shoal.

    The Philippine government has proposed takingthe dispute to the ITLOS as provided inUNCLOS, but the Chinese government hasrejected this, insisting on bilateral discussions.

    Phili i Cl i th

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    43/88

    Philippine Claim on theScarborough Shoal

    Several official Philippine maps published bySpain and United States in 18th and 20thcenturies show Scarborough Shoal as Philippine

    territory. The 2012 Scarborough Stand-off between

    PROC and RP has led the latter to seriouslyconsider upgrading its maritime patrol and arealreconnaissance capability by acquiring HamiltonClass Cutters from the U.S. and negotiating forpurchase of 12 fighter jets from South Korea for

    its small squadron.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    44/88

    What comprises a territory?

    2. INTERNAL WATERS

    These are bodies of water within the landboundaries of a State, or are closely linked toits land domain, such that they are consideredas legally equivalent to national land

    includes: rivers, lakes and land-locked

    seas, canals, and polar regions.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    45/88

    Rivers

    National rivers Lie wholly within 1 States territorial domain from

    source to mouth

    Belongs exclusively to that State

    Boundary Rivers

    Separates 2 Different States

    Belongs to both States: If river is navigable the boundary line is the

    middle of the navigable channel thalweg

    If the river is not navigable the boundary line is

    the midchannel

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    46/88

    Rivers

    Multinational rivers

    Runs through several States

    Forms part of the territory of the Statesthrough which it passes

    EX.: Congo River, Mekong River

    International rivers

    navigable from the open sea, and whichseparate or pass through several Statesbetween their sources and mouths

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    47/88

    Lakes and Land-locked Seas

    If entirely enclosed by territory of 1 state:Part of that States territory

    If surrounded by territories of severalStates: Part of the surrounding States

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    48/88

    Canals

    Artificially constructed waterways

    GR: Belongs to the States territory

    XPN: Important Inter-Oceanic Canalsgoverned by Special Regime

    Example

    (1) Suez Canal(2) Panama Canal

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    49/88

    Historic waters

    Waters considered internal only becauseof existence of a historic title, otherwise,should not have that charater

    EX.: Bay of Cancale in France

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    50/88

    What comprises a territory?

    3. MARITIME AND FLUVIAL DOMAIN

    Zones of the Sea

    Waters adjacent to the coasts of a State to aspecified limit

    1.Territorial Sea

    2.Contiguous Zone

    3.Exclusive Economic Zone4.Continental Shelf

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    51/88

    Territorial Sea

    comprises in the marginal belt adjacent to theland area or the coast and includes generally thebays, gulfs and straights which do not have the

    character ofhistoric waters (waters that arelegally part of the internal waters of the State)

    portion of the open sea adjacent to the States

    shores, over which that State exercisesjurisdictional control

    1982 Convention of the Law of the Sea providesthe maximum limit of 12 nautical miles from the

    baseline.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    52/88

    Territorial Sea

    Basis necessity of self-defense

    Effect territorial supremacy over the territorialsea, exclusive enjoyment of fishing rights and

    other coastal rights

    BUT: Subject to the RIGHT OF INNOCENTPASSAGE (a foreign State may exercise its right

    of innocent passage) Q: When is passage innocent?

    A: When it is not prejudicial to the peace, goodorder, or security of the coastal State

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    53/88

    Right of Innocent Passage

    The right of continuous and expeditious

    navigation of a foreign shop through a

    States territorial sea for the purpose of

    traversing that sea without entering the

    internal waters or calling at a roadstead or

    port facility outside the internal waters, or

    proceeding to or from internal waters or acall at such roadstead or port facility

    Extent and Limitations of Right

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    54/88

    Extent and Limitations of Rightof Innocent Passage

    Extends to ALL ships merchant andwarships

    Submarines must navigate on the surfaceand show their flag

    Nuclear-powered ships, ships carrying

    nuclear and dangerous substances mustcarry documents and observe specialsafety measures

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    55/88

    The Baseline Theory/Method

    Normal Baseline Method

    Territorial sea is drawn from the low-water mark.

    Q: What is the low-water mark?

    A: The line on the shore reached by the sea atlow tide. Otherwise known as the baseline.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    56/88

    The Baseline Theory/Method

    Straight Baseline Method

    A straight line is drawn across the sea, from headlandto headland, or from island to island. That straight line

    then becomes the baseline from which the territorialsea is measured.

    Q: What happens to the waters inside the line?

    A: Considered internal waters. However, the baseline

    must not depart to any appreciable extent from thegeneral direction of the coast

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    57/88

    The

    PhilippineBaseline(RA 9522)

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    58/88

    Contiguous Zone

    zone adjacent to the territorial sea, over whichthe coastal State may exercise such control as is

    necessary to: Prevent infringement of its customs, fiscal,

    immigration or sanitary laws within its territory orterritorial sea;

    Punish such infringement

    extends to a maximum of 24 nautical miles fromthe baseline from which the territorial sea ismeasured.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    59/88

    Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)

    a maximum zone of 200 nautical miles from thebaseline from which the territorial sea is measured,over which, the coastal State exercises sovereign

    rights over all the economic resources of the sea,sea-bed and subsoil

    Rights of other States in the

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    60/88

    Rights of other States in theEEZ

    Freedom of navigation and overflight

    Freedom to lay submarine cables and

    pipelines Freedom to engage in other internationally

    lawful uses of the sea related to said

    functions

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    61/88

    Continental Shelf

    comprises the seabed and subsoil of thesubmarine areas that extend beyond theterritorial sea throughout the natural

    prolongation of its land territory to the outeredge of the continental margin; or to a distanceof more than 200 nautical miles from thebaselines form which the breadth of the

    territorial sea is measured where the outeredge of the continental shelf does not extendup to that distance

    Rights of the Coastal State

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    62/88

    Rights of the Coastal State

    sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring andexploiting its natural resources

    rights are exclusive if the State does not

    explore or exploit the continental shelf, no onemay do so without its express consent

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    63/88

    Archipelagic Doctrine

    emphasizes the unity of land and waters bydefining an archipelago either as a group ofislands surrounded by waters or a body of waters

    studded with islands it requires that baselines be drawn by connecting

    the appropriate points of the outermost islands

    to encircle the islands within the archipelago

    waters on the landward side of the baselinesregardless of breadth or dimensions are merelyinternal waters

    Archipelagic

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    64/88

    ArchipelagicDoctrine

    an archipelago shall beregarded as a single unit,so that the waters around,between, and connectingthe islands of thearchipelago, irrespective oftheir breadth anddimensions, form part of theinternal waters of the state,subject to its exclusivesovereignty

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    65/88

    Rules Governing the Baselines

    Such baselines should not depart radically fromthe general direction of the coast, or from thegeneral configuration of the archipelago

    Within the baselines are included the main islandsan area with a maximum water area to land arearatio of 9:1

    Length of baselines shall not exceed 1nauticalmiles

    XPN: Up to 3% of the total number of baselines mayhave a maximum length of 125 nautical miles

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    66/88

    Effect of the Baselines

    The waters inside the baselines areconsidered internal waters;

    The territorial sea, etc. are measured fromsuch baselines;

    Archipelagic State exercises sovereignrights over all the waters enclosed by thebaselines

    Limitation Archipelagic

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    67/88

    Limitation ArchipelagicSealanes

    Archipelagic State must designate sea andair route for the continuous andexpeditious passage of foreign ships andaircraft through or over its archipelagicwaters and adjacent territorial sea

    Passage only for continuous, expeditious, and

    unobstructed transit between 1 part of thehigh seas or an EEX to another part of thehigh seas or an EEZ

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    68/88

    The Philippine Archipelago

    The Philippines adheres to theArchipelagic Doctrine Art. I, 1987Constitution:

    The waters around, between, and

    connecting the islands of the archipelago,regardless of their breadth and

    dimensions, form part of the internalwaters of the Philippines.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    69/88

    Republic Act No. 9522

    Amended RA 3046 as amended by RA 5446

    Defined the archipelagic baselines of thePhilippines

    The Philippine archipelago comprises of 101baselines

    Regimes of Islands:

    The Kalayaan Island Group as constitutedunder Presidential Decree No. 1596; and

    Bajo de Masinloc, also known as ScarboroughShoal

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    70/88

    Republic

    Act No.9522

    Scarborough

    Shoal

    Kalayaan

    Island Group

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    71/88

    The regime of the High Seas

    belongs to everyone and to no one both rescommones and res nullius

    everyone may enjoy the following rights over the

    high seas: Navigation, Fishing, Scientificresearch, Mining, Laying of submarine cables orpipelines; andother human activities in the opensea and the ocean floor

    the freedoms extend to the air space above thehigh seas

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    72/88

    Doctrine of Hot Pursuit

    The pursuit of a foreign vessel undertakenby the coastal State which has good

    reason to believe that the ship has violatedthe laws and regulations of that State.

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    73/88

    Requisites of DHP

    Be commenced when the ship is within thepursuing States:

    Internal Waters;

    Territorial Sea; or

    Contiguous Zone

    May be continued outside such waters if the

    pursuit has not been interrupted Continuous and unabated

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    74/88

    Requisites of DHP

    Ceases as soon as the foreign ship enters theterritorial sea of:

    Its own State; or

    That of a 3rd State Be undertaken by:

    Warships; or

    Military aircraft; or Other ships/aircraft cleared and identifiable as

    being in the government service andauthorized to that effect

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    75/88

    Aerial Domain

    the airspace above the territorial andmaritime domains of the State, to the limitsof the atmosphere

    does not include the outer space

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    76/88

    Air Space

    the air space above the States terrestrial and

    maritime territory

    Every State has complete and exclusive

    sovereignty over the air space above its territory Convention on International Civil Aviation

    Territory includes terrestrial and maritime

    territory thus, includes air space above territorial sea

    NO right of innocent passage!

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    77/88

    Air Space

    the air space above the high seas is open to allaircraft, just as the high seas is accessible toships of all States

    the State whose aerial space is violated can takemeasures to protect itself, but it does not mean thatStates have an unlimited right to attack the intrudingaircraft (intruding aircraft can be ordered either to

    leave the States air space or to land)

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    78/88

    5 Air Freedoms

    a. overflight without landing;

    b. landing for non-traffic purposes;

    c. put down traffic from state to airline;d. embark traffic destined for state of

    aircraft; and

    e. embark traffic or put down traffic to orfrom a third state

    P i C i f 1919

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    79/88

    Paris Convention of 1919

    Each nation has absolute sovereignty over theairspace overlying its territories and waters. Anation, therefore, has the right to deny entry and

    regulate flights (both foreign and domestic) intoand through its airspace.

    Aircraft of contracting states are to be treatedequally in the eyes of each nation's law.

    P i C ti f 1919

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    80/88

    Paris Convention of 1919

    Each nation should apply its airspace rulesequally to its own and foreign aircraft operatingwithin that airspace, and make rules such that its

    sovereignty and security are respected whileaffording as much freedom of passage aspossible to its own and other signatories' aircraft.

    Aircraft must be registered to a state, and theypossess the nationality of the state in which theyare registered.

    The 1944 Chicago Convention

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    81/88

    The 1944 Chicago Conventionon International Civil Aviation

    It provides that every State has complete andexclusive sovereignty over the airspace aboveits territory.

    It states the principle that aircraft have thenationality of the State in which they areregistered (notably, many rules governingaircraft, provided in the Convention, have beencopied from the rules governing ships).

    The 1944 Chicago Convention

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    82/88

    The 1944 Chicago Conventionon International Civil Aviation

    It makes a distinction between scheduled andunscheduled air services. No scheduledinternational air service of one State may be

    operated over or into the territory of anotherState, except with the special permission orother authorization of that State, and inaccordance with the terms of such permission or

    authorization.

    The 1944 Chicago Convention

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    83/88

    The 1944 Chicago Conventionon International Civil Aviation

    Aircraft not engaged in scheduled internationalair services have the right to make flights into orin transit non-stop across the territory of another

    State, and to make stops for non-traffic purposeswithout the necessity of obtaining priorpermission of that State, subject, however, to theright of the State flown over to require landing, or

    to impose certain restrictions, such as routesand off-limit areas.

    The 1944 Chicago Convention

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    84/88

    The 1944 Chicago Conventionon International Civil Aviation

    The Chicago Conventions applies only to civilaircraft, not to State aircraft which are used inmilitary, customs and police services.

    State aircraft have no right to fly over theterritory of another State or land thereon withoutauthorization by special agreement or otherwise,and in accordance with the terms thereof.

    O t S (R C )

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    85/88

    Outer Space (Res Communes)

    the space beyond the airspace surrounding theearth or beyond the national airspace, which iscompletely beyond the sovereignty of any State

    the moon and the other celestial bodies formpart of the outer space (Moon Treaty of 1979)

    thus, it is not subject to national appropriation

    free for all exploration and use by all States andcannot be annexed by any State

    governed by a regime similar to that of the highseas

    O t S T t

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    86/88

    Outer Space Treaty

    Outer Space is free for exploration and use byStates; cannot be annexed by any State

    Its use and exploration must be carried out for

    the benefit of all countries and in accordancewith international law

    Celestial bodies shall be used exclusively forpeaceful purposes

    Nuclear weapons and weapons of massdestruction shall not be placed in orbit aroundthe earth

    The Boundary between the Air

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    87/88

    yspace and the Outer space

    No accepted answer yet! There are differentopinions:

    That it should be near the lowest altitude

    (perigee) at which artificial earth satellites canremain in orbit without being destroyed by frictionwith the air around 190 km from earths surface

    Theoretical limit of air flights is 90 km above the

    earth Functional Approach: The legal regime governing

    space activities are based, not on a boundaryline, but on the nature of the activities

  • 7/30/2019 Lecture 04 Territory in International Law

    88/88

    END OF LECTURE

    Territory in International Law