28
Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) • complexity of the problem • forecasting methods • NWP • Limitations of NWP • Physics/dynamics This 0-3 This 0-3 month month forecast made forecast made using NWP using NWP models models

Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix)

• complexity of the problem

• forecasting methods

• NWP

• Limitations of NWP

• Physics/dynamics

This 0-3 month This 0-3 month forecast made forecast made using NWP modelsusing NWP models

Page 2: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Modern NWP for the Normandy (D-day) landings based on data available at the Modern NWP for the Normandy (D-day) landings based on data available at the time… http://www.ecmwf.int/research/era/dday/time… http://www.ecmwf.int/research/era/dday/

Historical skill of Historical skill of this long-range this long-range dynamical forecastdynamical forecast

Page 3: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

This 3 month lead-This 3 month lead-time forecast made time forecast made using statistical using statistical methodmethod

Page 4: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Historical skill of Historical skill of this long-range this long-range statistical forecaststatistical forecast

Page 5: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

• courtesy of Edward Hudson, Prairie & Arctic Aviation Weather Centre, Edmonton• taken 15 Nov., 2006

Page 6: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

RAIN FELL FROM overcast skies and gale force winds drove large waves on to RAIN FELL FROM overcast skies and gale force winds drove large waves on to the beaches of Normandy as dawn broke on Monday June 5, 1944. To the the beaches of Normandy as dawn broke on Monday June 5, 1944. To the Germans watching their defences, there was nothing to show that this was the Germans watching their defences, there was nothing to show that this was the moment the Allied Armies had planned to invade Europe. In fact, the operation moment the Allied Armies had planned to invade Europe. In fact, the operation had been put on hold because the bad weather had been forecast 24 hours before. had been put on hold because the bad weather had been forecast 24 hours before. Had it gone ahead in these conditions, the invasion would have been a catastrophic Had it gone ahead in these conditions, the invasion would have been a catastrophic disaster.disaster.

Nevertheless, the invasion had to occur on either the 5th, 6th or 7th of June to take Nevertheless, the invasion had to occur on either the 5th, 6th or 7th of June to take advantage of the right conditions of moon and tide. Darkness was needed when the advantage of the right conditions of moon and tide. Darkness was needed when the airborne troops went in, but moonlight once they were on the ground. Spring low airborne troops went in, but moonlight once they were on the ground. Spring low tide was necessary to ensure extreme low sea level so that the landing craft could tide was necessary to ensure extreme low sea level so that the landing craft could spot and avoid the thousands of mined obstacles that had been deployed on the spot and avoid the thousands of mined obstacles that had been deployed on the beaches. If this narrow time slot was missed, the invasion would have to be beaches. If this narrow time slot was missed, the invasion would have to be delayed for two weeks.delayed for two weeks.

From “From “The Most Important Forecast in History,” by E. Brenstrum (N.Z. Meteorological ,” by E. Brenstrum (N.Z. Meteorological Service). Published in Service). Published in New Zealand GeographicNew Zealand Geographic, pp, pp11-16, Vol. 22, 1994, ,

Page 7: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Fluxes of solar radiation (interact with clouds)

Fluxes of longwave radiation (temperature-and composition- dependent)

Cloud

vertical windwater/ice/vapour temperature

Boundary fluxes of heat and moisture (QH, QE) and momentum (frictional drag ) on complex terrain

horizontal wind

variables inter-linked by consv. of mass, heat & momentum. Relations expressed as partial differential eqn’s

winds on range of scales down to millimeters - cause advection, entrainment, etc.

pressure

Page 8: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Forecasting** methodsForecasting** methods

Value of a given technique depends on “range” of the forecast. For now, focus on “weather” forecast… ie. range of up to a couple of weeks

• Persistence: hard to beat for f/c range of a few hours

- eg. This afternoon’s weather same as this morning’s, except for influence of local processes (eg. solar heating)

• Climatology: hard to beat for f/c ranges beyond about 10 days.

– “The average.” eg., this afternoon’s weather in Edmonton will equal the average observed 1961-1990 for Nov. 15 in Edmonton

– or, (eg.) this afternoon’s weather will be that associated with one of a set of “map types,” ie. previously observed on an afternoon having similar maps. Called an “analog method”... Ah! We’ve seen this… in 1901 …

– or, forecast the anomaly associated with (eg.) Southern Oscillation Index

• Numerical Weather Prediction: hard to beat for f/c range out to about 10 days (esp. if supplemented by experienced human interpretation)

** “nowcasting” and “hindcasting”** “nowcasting” and “hindcasting”

Page 9: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

““Causal” weather prediction Causal” weather prediction (pre-computer age) (pre-computer age) Detailed analysis of “initial state,” using hand-plotted weather maps & charts

Interpretation using rules and conceptual models (such as Polar Front theory, etc) having a physical basis, eg.

• Atmospheric stability

• air-sea interaction

• local diurnal cycle - surface energy balance

Richardson’s pioneering hand-computation

Lewis Fry Richardson Lewis Fry Richardson (1881-1953)(1881-1953)

• science degree Cambridge 1903• applied calculus to help Nat’l Peat Co. cut drains in peat• 1913 joined Meteorol. Off. (supervised an observatory)• ambulance driver, WW1 France• in off-duty time, embarked on test of his mathematical

forecasting system… had taken with him to France observations for 7 a.m., 20 May 1910.• by 1916, wrote Weather Prediction by Arithmetic Finite

Differences… published 1922

Page 10: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Richardson divided a map of Europe into squares… for each he tabulated atmospheric pressure… armed with a slide rule and mathematical tables, he began the laborious task of 'forecasting' what was going to happen to the weather at 1 p.m. on his selected day… producing by hand a six-hour weather forecast which he could check against observations. For each square on his map, he applied his numerous equations, to calculate changes of pressure, wind and temperature… The six-hour forecast took him six weeks. And when he had finished, the forecast was horribly wrong.

Images and quotation from P. Holper, Australian Broadcasting Corp.,http://www.abc.net.au/science/slab/forecast/story.htm

For an excerpt from Richardson’s book, seehttp://alumnus.caltech.edu/~zimm/weather.html

Page 11: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Numerical Weather PredictionNumerical Weather Prediction

Based on the physics as expressed in equations… conservation of mass, momentum, energy + equations of state + (etc.)

set of coupled “partial differential equations” for U,V,W,T,Q… versus x,y,z,t (or more typically lat., long., pressure and time)

which can be solved numerically given “initial” and “boundary” conditions (eg. sea surface temperature + much more)

produces gridded fields of U,V,W,T,Q,…

to produce forecast numerical output supplemented by rules of thumb, statistical packages, subjective guidance

Page 12: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Stages in NWPStages in NWP

data acquisition analysis phase

initialisation (t=0) prediction phase (numerical integration) post-processing phase

Page 13: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

The decision to postpone the invasion for 24 hours had been taken by Eisenhower and The decision to postpone the invasion for 24 hours had been taken by Eisenhower and the Supreme Command at 0430 on Sunday June 4. It was not taken lightly, because so the Supreme Command at 0430 on Sunday June 4. It was not taken lightly, because so many ships were already converging on Normandy that the risk of detection was grave. many ships were already converging on Normandy that the risk of detection was grave. Nor had the forecast which prompted the postponement been easily arrived at. Nor had the forecast which prompted the postponement been easily arrived at. Eisenhower's weather advice was provide by Group Captain Stagg, a forecaster Eisenhower's weather advice was provide by Group Captain Stagg, a forecaster seconded from the British Meteorological Office who was coordinating the advice of seconded from the British Meteorological Office who was coordinating the advice of three forecasting teams: one from the Meteorological Office, one from the Admiralty three forecasting teams: one from the Meteorological Office, one from the Admiralty and one from the United States Army Air Forces.and one from the United States Army Air Forces.

The advice of these groups was often diametrically opposed. The American team used The advice of these groups was often diametrically opposed. The American team used an analog method, comparing the current map with maps from the past, and were often an analog method, comparing the current map with maps from the past, and were often over-optimistic. The Meteorological Office, aided by the brilliant Norwegian over-optimistic. The Meteorological Office, aided by the brilliant Norwegian theoretician Sverre Petterssen, had a more dynamic approach, using wind and theoretician Sverre Petterssen, had a more dynamic approach, using wind and temperature observations from high altitude provide by the air force, and were closer to temperature observations from high altitude provide by the air force, and were closer to the mark.the mark.

The decision to invade on Tuesday June 6, taken late on Sunday night and finally The decision to invade on Tuesday June 6, taken late on Sunday night and finally confirmed early Monday morning, was based on a forecast of a short period of confirmed early Monday morning, was based on a forecast of a short period of improved weather caused by a strengthening ridge following the front that brought improved weather caused by a strengthening ridge following the front that brought Monday's rain and strong winds. In the event, Monday's bad weather had already given Monday's rain and strong winds. In the event, Monday's bad weather had already given the Allies a crucial advantage: it had put the Germans off guard.the Allies a crucial advantage: it had put the Germans off guard.

From From New Zealand GeographicNew Zealand Geographic, pp, pp11-16, Vol. 22, 1994

Page 14: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Data acquisitionData acquisition regional or global? (depending on f/c range) obs. coordinated by World Meteorol. Org. 10K land obs stations, 7K ship obs, 300 buoys, weather satellites, 1K

radiosondes twice daily + (still in research phase) sensors on scheduled commercial aircraft +…

“synoptic times” 0000 and 1200 UTC (GMT), but increasing amount of data comes in off the synoptic times… challenge to incorporate these

Surface winds from satellite scatterometry

Doppler wind sounders(acoustic & electromagnetic)

Page 15: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Fig. 13-3

Rawindsonde

The traditional in-situ synoptic data…The traditional in-situ synoptic data…

Page 16: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Analysis PhaseAnalysis Phase• quality control… criteria of physical acceptability (eg. no negative pressures) and plausibility relative to climate

• interpolation onto a regular “grid” of points

• numerical analysis: adjustment to form fields that are consistent with allowable physics (eg. winds must be such that air mass is conserved) and consistent with the numerical model being used (eg. initial data must not contain features the model is unable to resolve, eg. reduced winds in a small valley not “visible” in model’s terrain)

• the “adjustment” blends the observations for time t0 with a 6 hour forecast valid for t0

Page 17: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

I I+1I-1

J+1

J

J-1

TI+1, JTI, J TI-1, J

x

T

x I J

T T

xI J I J

,

, ,1 1

Data on a grid (shown in 2-d), example of “interpolation”, and Data on a grid (shown in 2-d), example of “interpolation”, and finite-difference representation of a gradientfinite-difference representation of a gradient

Te

T TI J I J , ,1

2

eeww

nn

Page 18: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

x1 x2

z1

z2

I , JFx(x1) Fx(x2)

Fz(z2)

Fz(z1)

x

z

“flux” of air is a vector with componentsFx,y,z [kg m-2 s-1]

Since flux is convective,

)()()( xxUxFx

I-1 , J-1

Building an equation to express conservation of air mass on the gridBuilding an equation to express conservation of air mass on the grid

Wind components: U,V,W

Page 19: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

x1 x2

z1

z2

I , JFx(x1) Fx(x2)

Fz(z2)

Fz(z1)

x

z

I-1 , J-1

Thus we need to interpolate values of U and on “control volume faces”

… expresses the change IJ in time t of the mass [kg] of air in box IJ. (Note: y is the face length along y)

)()()()( 2121, zFzFyxtxFxFyztzyx zzxxJI

Page 20: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Numerical integration (prediction phase)Numerical integration (prediction phase)

...,,

,,

,,

n

KJI

n

KJI

n

KJI x

TU

t

T

tt

TTT

n

KJI

n

KJI

n

KJI

,,

,,

1

,,

Governing equations have form (eg.)

(term shown on r.h.s. is advection of heat along the x-axis). On re-arrangement one has a formula to advance the temperature at gridpoint (I,J,K) over time interval t (15 minutes, GEM global, Nov. 06) from time “n” to time “n+1”

Repeat the process to go from time “n+1” to “n+2”… out to 12, 24, 36, 48 hours (or longer).

End result: forecast fields of U,V,W,T,P, , Q (humidity) on the grid

Page 21: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Post-processing phasePost-processing phase Forecast products usually involve

subjective human involvement. Forecaster compares models, knows which aspects of which models have proven reliable

ALERT: Received the following bulletin at Mon Dec 02 08:04:08 UTC. MAIN WX DISCUSSION, UPPER LEVEL PATTERN

WHILE OVER W CST THE L/W UPPER RIDGE WILL PERSIST, CONDITIONS WILL BE QUITE ACTIVE IN THE VAST CYCLONIC CIRCULATION COVERING ALMOST ENTIRE CANADA AND ARCTIC... HOWEVER DESPITE THIS HIGHLY CHANGING UPPER LEVEL PATTERN, MODELS ARE IN QUITE GOOD AGREEMENT FOR THE UPPER LEVEL PATTERN EVOLUTION NEXT 48 HRS. SINCE REGGEM HAS VERIFIED THE BEST PAST RUN AND IS VERY CONSISTENT, WE ACCEPT ITS SCENARIO.

may use rules of thumb and/or supplementary statistical algorithms to forecast weather elements, eg. tomorrow’s max or visibility for an airport

produce and distribute maps for mandatory levels, to convey model output to forecasters

Page 22: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Fig. 13-17

The “omega-block” (or “omega high”)The “omega-block” (or “omega high”)

• tends to persist• predictable weather• useful hint to forecaster

Page 23: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Weather in relation to Operation Uranus – Soviet encirclement of Weather in relation to Operation Uranus – Soviet encirclement of besieging German 6besieging German 6thth Army at Stalingrad; 19 Nov., 1942 Army at Stalingrad; 19 Nov., 1942

From Ch15 of A. Beevor’sFrom Ch15 of A. Beevor’s “Stalingrad. The Fateful Siege: 1942-1943” “Stalingrad. The Fateful Siege: 1942-1943”

““All through the night, Soviet sappers in white camouflage suits had been crawling All through the night, Soviet sappers in white camouflage suits had been crawling forward in the snow, lifting anti-tank mines… One Soviet general said that the forward in the snow, lifting anti-tank mines… One Soviet general said that the freezing white mist was `as thick as milk’… Front headquarters considered a further freezing white mist was `as thick as milk’… Front headquarters considered a further postponement, due to the bad visibility, but decided against it…postponement, due to the bad visibility, but decided against it…

`Once again, the Russians have made masterly use of the bad weather,’ wrote `Once again, the Russians have made masterly use of the bad weather,’ wrote (General von) Richthofen(General von) Richthofen

During the afternoon of 19 November, the Soviet tanks advanced southwards in During the afternoon of 19 November, the Soviet tanks advanced southwards in columns through the freezing mist… it was Butkov’s 1columns through the freezing mist… it was Butkov’s 1stst Tank Corps which finally Tank Corps which finally encountered the gravely weakened 48th Panzer Corps. The German tanks still encountered the gravely weakened 48th Panzer Corps. The German tanks still suffered from electrical problems, and their narrow tracks slid around on the black suffered from electrical problems, and their narrow tracks slid around on the black ice. The fighting in the gathering dark was chaotic. The usual German advantages of ice. The fighting in the gathering dark was chaotic. The usual German advantages of tactical skill and coordination were entirely lost.”tactical skill and coordination were entirely lost.”

Page 24: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Forecasting algorithm that employs an established (historical) statistical correlation between:

• past observed values of weather variables (eg. visibility VV), and

• corresponding forecast values of a set of “relevant” variables from NWP model (eg. local 500 mb height HH500500, wind speed and direction at 850 mb, UU850850, , 850850, etc.)

• of form VV = VV (HH500500, , UU850850, , 850850, ... )

• used predictively with machine forecasts to predict future weather

• this partly “corrects” flaws in NWP model. But MOS correlations must be re-calculated (“re-trained”) for each revision of NWP model

Model Output Statistics (MOS)Model Output Statistics (MOS)

Page 25: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Medium-range forecastingMedium-range forecasting

Numerical forecast for ranges of order 3-15 days not much skill beyond one week increasingly common to perform “ensemble forecast” (multiple model runs

starting from slightly different initial conditions that attempt to mimic possible errors in the initial data). Variability of the forecast amongst ensemble-members implies greater uncertainty

Long-range seasonal anomaly forecastingLong-range seasonal anomaly forecasting

Statistical techniques presently the most important where numerical models involved, must be coupled land-atmosphere-ocean at present, low skill

Page 26: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Attributes of NWP modelsAttributes of NWP models

• domain & boundary conditions (eg. if global, no lateral boundaries)

• spatial and temporal resolution

• grid or spectral representation?

• model “dynamics” (approximations in the equations, eg. hydrostatic?; choice of dependent variables, eg. velocity or vorticity?...)

• model “physics” (which includes “parameterizations” of effects of unresolved scales of motion):

• radiation as function of model’s diagnosed cloud and possibly other resolved properties such as humidity, CO2 concentration… • convection (deep & shallow), clouds (stratiform & cumuliform) & precip• surface exchange (momentum, heat, vapour, CO2…) based on surface

state, analyzed or forecast• drag on unresolved terrain features

trade-offsin speed vs. detail

Page 27: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Compromising limitations of numerical weather forecastingCompromising limitations of numerical weather forecasting

extreme sensitivity to initial data (growth of initial errors) data-sparse regions inability to represent all scales of motion, from the planetary down to the scale of a cloud droplet

at present, grid-spacing order 10 km in horiz… thus for example no possibility to model cumulus… effects of cumulus must be “parametrized” (eg. diagnose cloud base and cloud top height from model’s temperature and humidity profiles: re-mix heat and vapour uniformly in that layer)

some processes entirely missing others (eg. land-atmosphere exchange, drag on small hills) oversimplified/poorly represented

Page 28: Lec. 27+28: Weather Forecasting & Analysis (Ch 13 + Appendix) complexity of the problem forecasting methods NWP Limitations of NWP Physics/dynamics This

Forecast AssessmentForecast Assessment

considered “skillful” if provides (in a statistical sense) greater accuracy than persistence or climatological forecasts

forecasting extremes: valuable when right, penalizing when wrong - forecasters reluctant to forecast extremes, more likely to be correct if f/c near-average conditions

types of f/c include qualitative (categorical), quantitative, probability f/c

many criteria exist for accuracy of f/c, eg. mean absolute error (MAE) average magnitude of difference between f/c and actuality

Quality --- Value

skill accuracy