18
LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

LEARNING THEORIES

Scott M. Hodgson000282377

Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor

1-18-13

Page 2: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

Three Types of Learning Theories

•Constructivism•Cognitivism•Behaviorism

Page 3: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

When Constructivism is Beneficial for Learners

• Constructs their own learning• It’s interactive• Performed in groups• Situated in realistic settings

Page 4: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

When Cognitivism is Beneficial for Learners

• Encourages an independent learning environment

• Students work on their own and are encouraged to reach their full potential

• Learning is added to what is already known

Page 5: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

When Behaviorism is Beneficial for Learners

• When dealing with learning management and rules

• Focusing on consequences of performance outcomes

• For reactive learners

Page 6: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

Learning Theory Lesson Plan

•Students will learn the use and benefits of the PDCA learning cycle.

•Students will learn through classroom instruction in groups, scenario simulation, and practice using a mock project.

•Students will complete a PDCA cycle on paper for each scenario and mock project.

Page 7: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

Learning Theory – Lesson Plan

Constructivism

Page 8: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

ADAPTATION OF LESSON PLAN

•Adapt the current learning theory

from a constructivism approach to

a behaviorism learning theory.

Page 9: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

BEST LEARNING THEORY FOR THIS LESSON PLAN

•Constructivism

Page 10: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION THROUGH THE USE OF

DESIGN THEORIES•Uses a variety of ways to adapt lessons to find what fits for which students•Lessons tailored to the student•Student interacts with different learning styles

Page 11: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

Best Design Process

• Wiggins Backward Design–Targets multiple learning styles–End goal in mind. What do you want

the students to learn?–Find the best way for the result to

happen.

Page 12: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

Strengths of Wiggins Theory• Simplifies and focuses goal planning

• Instruction is based on what you want your students to do at the end of the instruction

• Instruction mastery is easily identified

Page 13: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

Limitations of Wiggins• Instructors must spend a lot of

time defining goals• Goals are reached or they aren’t,

not much flexibility to adapt• Not effective in certain learning

situations

Page 14: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

Strengths of Gagne’s Events

• Events can be used as a checklist to mark off as instruction is designed

• Flexibility to adapt if student has prior knowledge of an event

• Events can be tailored to the objective. All events don’t have to be used

Page 15: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

Limitations of Gagne’s Events

• Takes a lot of time to plan lessons• Could be rigid. Does not permit

much creativity• Some events can be hard to

implement, some easy

Page 16: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

Strengths of Teaching for Understanding• Students can transfer learning into

real life situations• Can be used with other learning

theories to strengthen retention• Easy to connect with what students

are already learning

Page 17: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

Limitations of Teaching for Understanding• Time consuming• Expensive• Not as much structure as other

theories• Use of non-traditional materials

can be confusing to students

Page 18: LEARNING THEORIES Scott M. Hodgson 000282377 Assessment code: JOT2 – TASK 2 Mentor: Kimberly Taylor 1-18-13

MOST SUITABLE DESIGN PROCESS

Wiggins Backward Design•Similar to a task analysis, you get a desired state and a road map of how to accomplish it•Focus on the end result•Measure and adapt as you progress