Upload
silas-burke
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Learning stylesLearning styles
Implications for technology Implications for technology selectionselection
Cognitive Personality style
Information processing style
Instructional Preferences
Curry’s Onion ModelCurry’s Onion Model
Stable, not easily changed, high importance
Easily changed but less important
Honey and MumfordHoney and Mumford
Activitists (Do)Activitists (Do)– Immerse themselves fully in new experiences Immerse themselves fully in new experiences – Act first, consider consequences later Act first, consider consequences later – Seek to centre activity around themselves Seek to centre activity around themselves
Reflectors (Review)Reflectors (Review)– Stand back and observe Stand back and observe – Cautious Cautious – Collect and analyze data Collect and analyze data – Maintain a big picture perspective. Maintain a big picture perspective.
Honey and MumfordHoney and Mumford
Theorists (Conclude)Theorists (Conclude)– Logical, value rationality and objectivity Logical, value rationality and objectivity – Assimilate disparate facts into coherent theories Assimilate disparate facts into coherent theories – Keen on basic assumptions, principles, theories, models Keen on basic assumptions, principles, theories, models
and systems thinking and systems thinking
Pragmatists (Plan)Pragmatists (Plan)– Keen to put ideas, theories and techniques into practice Keen to put ideas, theories and techniques into practice – Search new ideas and experiment Search new ideas and experiment – Act quickly and confidently on ideas, gets straight to the Act quickly and confidently on ideas, gets straight to the
point point
Kolb Four stage modelKolb Four stage model
Concrete Experience
Active Experimentation
Reflective Observation
Abstract Conceptualization
Kolb Learning Styles/PreferencesKolb Learning Styles/Preferences
Four-type definition of learning styles Four-type definition of learning styles each representing the combination of two each representing the combination of two preferred styles, preferred styles,
Diverging (CE/RO)Diverging (CE/RO) Assimilating (AC/RO)Assimilating (AC/RO) Converging (AC/AE)Converging (AC/AE) Accommodating (CE/AE)Accommodating (CE/AE)
Concrete Experience
Abstract Conceptualization
Active Experimentation
Reflective Observation
Kolb’s Learning Style InventoryKolb’s Learning Style Inventory
The Converging styleThe Converging style – good at problem solving, decision making and the practical application of ideas; good at problem solving, decision making and the practical application of ideas;
– does best in situations like conventional intelligence tests;does best in situations like conventional intelligence tests;
– prefers dealing with technical problems rather than interpersonal issues.prefers dealing with technical problems rather than interpersonal issues.
The Diverging style The Diverging style – emphasises concrete experience and reflective observationemphasises concrete experience and reflective observation
– imaginative and aware of meanings and values; imaginative and aware of meanings and values;
– views concrete situations from many perspectives; views concrete situations from many perspectives;
– adapts by observation rather than by action; adapts by observation rather than by action;
KolbKolb
The Assimilating styleThe Assimilating style – likes to reason inductively and to create theoretical models likes to reason inductively and to create theoretical models
– is more concerned with ideas and abstract concepts than with is more concerned with ideas and abstract concepts than with people; people;
The Accommodating styleThe Accommodating style – likes doing things, carrying out plans and getting involved in new likes doing things, carrying out plans and getting involved in new
experiencesexperiences
– good at adapting to changing circumstancesgood at adapting to changing circumstances
– solves problems in an intuitive, trial-and-error manner; solves problems in an intuitive, trial-and-error manner;
Are we asking the right questions …Are we asking the right questions …
Which technology will best meet the pedagogical Which technology will best meet the pedagogical
aims of the learning activity?aims of the learning activity?
How can we use the technology to best meet the How can we use the technology to best meet the
learning needs of the students?learning needs of the students?
How will employing technology for this activity affect How will employing technology for this activity affect
teaching practices and how should these best be teaching practices and how should these best be
supported?supported?
How will experiences from e-activities be shared and How will experiences from e-activities be shared and
built upon across the institution? built upon across the institution?
Points to considerPoints to consider
Online learner support needsOnline learner support needs– Clearly stated tasks, deadlines, expectationsClearly stated tasks, deadlines, expectations– Encouragement to participateEncouragement to participate– Recognition of their contributionsRecognition of their contributions– Constructive feedback and reassurance on their Constructive feedback and reassurance on their
performanceperformance– Help with communicating their ideas and views Help with communicating their ideas and views
appropriatelyappropriately– Encouragement to take control of their own learningEncouragement to take control of their own learning– Help with self/time/task management skillsHelp with self/time/task management skills– Help with using the technology effectivelyHelp with using the technology effectively– Flexible ways of workingFlexible ways of working
Tutor/facilitator issuesTutor/facilitator issues
Role of the tutorRole of the tutor Workload and time managementWorkload and time management VisibilityVisibility Complexity of the taskComplexity of the task
Subject expert, facilitatorSubject expert, facilitatoradministrator, technical supportadministrator, technical support
Online availability: student contact hoursOnline availability: student contact hours Tutor teamsTutor teams IT trainingIT training
Stages(Adapted from Gilly Salmon, 2000)
Access and motivation
Group socialization
Information exchange
Knowledge construction
Development
Setting up system and accessing
Sending and receiving messages
Building social bridges
Welcoming and encouraging
Searching, personalization features
Facilitating tasks and use oflearning materials
Conferencing Facilitating process
Supporting, responding
Providing links to external resources
e-Tutor
Technical support
Some examples of technology Some examples of technology accommodating learning stylesaccommodating learning styles
Podcasting for languagesPodcasting for languages– http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/german/poetry/podchttp://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/german/poetry/podc
asts/01asts/01 BlogsBlogs
– http://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/pkirwan/http://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/pkirwan/ WikiWiki
– http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/maths/undergrad/modhttp://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/maths/undergrad/modules/ma3e2/ules/ma3e2/
Blended approachBlended approach– http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/ren/elizabethan_jacohttp://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/ren/elizabethan_jaco
bean_drama/kyd/bean_drama/kyd/