Upload
kumiko
View
32
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Leading Edge 2020: Where Next for the MDGs? Olive Moore and Maeve Bateman, Trocaire. Total Interviewees: breakdown by Country Base. Breakdown by Sector: MDG Analysis. Breakdown by Sector: Overall. Top Trends – Initial Findings. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Leading Edge 2020: Where Next for the MDGs?
Olive Moore and Maeve Bateman, Trocaire
Total Interviewees: breakdown by Country Base
Breakdown by Sector: MDG Analysis
Sector
Academia
Donor
Faith-based
Foundation
IFI
NGO
Network
Think Tank
Breakdown by Sector: Overall
Top Trends – Initial Findings
Changing Geopolitics: Rise of China, Middle-Income Countries, BRICs
Climate Change: environmental sustainability
Conflict (resource shortages) Less resources & support for aid/ODA Changing climate of aid effectiveness, need
to demonstrate results Inequality, Migration, Agriculture,
Technology
MDGs: Still Relevant?
Approximately half the interviewees to date believed they were still relevant, though many of these qualified that statement
A quarter felt they had no relevance
A quarter were ambiguous
Positive attitudes
‘If you want to go quickly, go alone; if you want to go far, go together. I think of The MDGs as a very messy go together’
– Network, US
‘The value added is around giving some general overall goals for everybody to keep their eye.’
-Consultant, Female, Bolivia
Positive Attitudes
‘It has produced positive external pressure - no country wants to lag behind.’ –
NGO Director, Female, Malawi
‘‘The MDGs are a simple and clear articulation of what is required for human development. They are target-oriented, clear, simple, precise and helpful.’
INGO Director, Male, India
Attitudes: Mixed
‘MDGs provide focus, something for people to rally around, but like other management targets, they skew the efforts towards narrow targets.’
INGO Director, Male, Italy
‘While the MDGs are important they miss the point about how you get there. It’s the wrong starting place for where we need to be post 2015 but that doesn’t mean we throw it out at this point, we get what we can out of it.’ Think Tank, Female, UK
Attitudes: Negative
‘The MDGs have no relevance; they’re poetry. At the present rate of implementation they will be achieved in 2155, not 2015.’
Priest and human rights activist, South Africa
Where next? MDGs After 2015Options: Extend the deadline Revise/add new indicators and extend the
deadline New Framework Come to an end with no replacement
Difference between what people think should happen and what they think will happen
What next? Review and Revise The need to review and learn from the
MDGs was highlighted by a significant number of interviewees
Inclusion of new targets: climate change, energy, agriculture
New Actors New Targets New Measurement