Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LEADERSHIP FOR RESULTS IN CONSERVATION
GLOBAL SNOW LEOPARD CONSERVATION FORUMBishkek, Kyrgyz Republic – October 22‐23, 2013
Bruno LaporteLeadership, Knowledge, Learning LLC
Inspiration from the Front Lines Inspiration from a Global Movement The need for Collective Leadership Key challenges in GSLEP Key capacity gaps in GSLEP Leadership for Results in Conservation Program Learning from Pilot programs Impact on the Front Lines
2
Outline of Presentation
Inspiration from the Front Lines
Rupak MaharjanWildlife Ranger“We know that it is possible to curb poaching by working with local stakeholders and organizations”
What is needed∙ stronger ranger commitments to stop wildlife crime∙ more community based programs to elevate awareness∙ heightened coordinated effortsbetween enforcement agencies.
GTI – Global Alliance and New Model for Biodiversity Conservation
13 Tiger Range Countries + International Partners
Working together for a common agenda, and a shared goal.
Inspiration from a Global Movement
4
LEADERSHIP
Better state
Status quo
The Need for Collective Leadership
COALITION BUILDING
5
Status Quo
HOW?
Engaging local communities and addressing human‐wildlife conflict
Combating poaching and illegal trade Managing habitat and prey Engaging Business and Industry Enhancing trans‐boundary management and enforcement‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Enhancing Conservation policies & institutions Improving research and monitoring Raising awareness Enhancing capacity building for conservation
6
Key Challenges outlined in the GSLEP
Legislation need to be enacted and enforced.
Institutions need to be created or strengthened
Front line staff need to be trained, equipped, and deployed
New stakeholders need to be brought into conservation
Policy makers need to incorporate the economic and ecological value of wild life and their natural habitats, in national planning and policies
Conservation organizations need to engage collectively and not in isolation.
Key Capacity Gaps identified in the GSLEP
7
This is not business as usual: there is a need to confront difficult problems that require the clarification of values and change in behavior and attitudes.
This is not the business of the conservation community only: solving these difficult problems require the involvement of all stakeholders across government, private sector and civil society
Leadership is a process of mobilizing people, ideas and resources to achieve a shared purpose.
Leadership is at the core of the Challenges faced by SL Range Countries
Coalitions for Change in Support GSLEP
National Coalitions within each of the range countries to to create enabling conditions for effective implementation and ultimately results on the ground
Global Coalition12 Range Countries+ InternationalPartners
GSLEP
Law Enforcement
System
Scientific Community
International Donor System
Civil Society System
Governmental System
Justice System
Business Sector Common Agenda
Shared Measurement
Mutually Reinforcing Activities
Continuous Communications
Backbone Secretariat
Capacity Development: Entry Points
LEARNING
AcademicContinuousExperimental
LEADERSHIP
CollectiveAdaptive
Inspirational
KNOWLEDGE
Global KnowledgeLocal Innovation
Networks
Capacity For
Reforms
Adaptive Problems
No adequate response has been developed.
Need to overcome the conflicts in values
Require changes in values, attitudes or habits of behavior
11
Technical Leadership vs. Adaptive Leadership
Technical Problems
A body of knowledge exists
Organizational procedures in place
Role of hierarchy is clear
People can be trained to respond
Parks as Economic Generators
Technical Challenges
Change the mind sets of national park managers and staff, from looking inward (planning & protecting) to looking outside, to conservation landscapes, to accept that those who live at the fringes of protected areas can become stewards of conservation
Adaptive Challenges
Quantifying benefits (employment generation, financial revenues)
Implementing poverty alleviation strategies: PES, livelihoods
Planning heritage and nature‐based tourism
Investing in smart green infrastructure
Innovative financing12
Brings transformative solutions to complex conservation problems
Integrates intensive leadership development skills training with technical thematic content on frontier themes
Focuses on functional teams (not individuals), across sectors and levels
Combines executive leadership development seminars, with problem identification ex‐ante, and follow up and support to implementation ex‐post
Brings relevant experts with state of the art knowledge on the science of biodiversity and the science of implementation
Leadership for Results in Conservation (L4RC)
13
Design principles
Leadership for Results in Conservation (L4RC)Program Structure
14
Phase One : Problem Identification
Participant teams are expected to bring to the program a preliminary project proposal, with a clearly defined problem statement.
Phase Two: Leadership Development Seminar
A 10 day intensive face‐to‐face seminar weaves 6 leadership development modules deeply into the thematic content presented in clusters of frontier themes.
Phase Three: Follow up
A year‐long follow‐up phase for teams to apply their new skills through a process of learning‐by‐doing.
ParksAs EconomicGenerators
Private SectorSolutions
Innovation in Science,
technology
L4RC – Phase I – Identification
• National Level• Enabling Environment• Policies and Institutions
GovernmentParliamentJudiciaryPress
• Regional Level• Influencing Policies and Institutions• Managing Organizations
Regional AuthoritiesCorporations
NGOs
• Local Level• Managing Parks and Protected AreasParks
Civil SocietyCommunities
RESULTS
RESULTS
15
Adaptive Leadership•Adaptive challenge• Stakeholders•Mobilization
Coalition Building Diagnostics• Stakeholder analysis•NetMap
Strategic Communication•Change behavior•What’s in it for me (WIIFM)
Rapid Results Approach
• Discovering what works
• Problem‐solving process to engage stakeholders
• Building foundation for greater impact
• Boost performance
Implementation
Learning andReflection
L4RC ‐ Phase II: Leadership Seminar
16
Leadershipteams
Innovation
Continuouslearning
Technicalassistance
Leadershipseminars
L4RC ‐ Phase III: Follow up Support
17
Leadership ProgramBhutan 2013
Leadership ProgramNepal 2012
Leadership ProgramKyrgyzstan 2014
Partner programs
eInstitute
Open Park NetworkClemson University
Knowledge data bases
Access to finance
Study visitsTwinning arrangements
Business model development
Best practices
Grand challenge
Innovation scanning
Competitions
Rapid results Implementation
Leadership for Results in Conservation (L4RC)A Consortium of Partners
GSLEP TEAMSGSLEP TEAMS
Centers of ExcellenceCenters of Excellence
International Delivery PartnersInternational Delivery Partners
Centers of ExcellenceCenters of Excellence
Bangladesh: Sundarban WLS
Bhutan: Thrumshingla NP
China: Hunchun NR
India: Dudhwa TR, Manas TR
Nepal: Chitwan, Bardia, Suklaphanta, Parsa, Banke NP
Russia: Sikhote Alin Biosphere Zapovednik
Learning from Pilot Programs: Nepal
19WORLD BANK INSTITUTEPromoting knowledge and learning for a better world
THE REGIONAL SMART PATROL TRAININGFOR TIGER CONSERVATION
Participants Take Away: “Able to recognizeadaptive versus technical challenges”
20WORLD BANK INSTITUTEPromoting knowledge and learning for a better world
Participants Take Away: “Able to engagein collective problem solving”
21WORLD BANK INSTITUTEPromoting knowledge and learning for a better world
Participants Take Away:“Able to accelerate implementation”
22WORLD BANK INSTITUTEPromoting knowledge and learning for a better world
Madhu ChetriRanger Manaslu Conservation AreaNepal
“After the training, my team has become very smart, and our anti‐poaching units are very active”
“We were able to develop some sources of intelligence to curb illegal wildlife trade. These things became only possible with the training I got.”
L4RC Impact on the Front Lines