Upload
urbain
View
40
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
LCFF and LCAP Reshapes School Funding and Accountability Part I: LCFF Russ Frank RCOE. Resources. School Services of California Legislative Analyst’s Report WestEd Special Thanks to: Nancy Sheets: Director II, RCOE Paul Jessup: Deputy Superintendent, RCOE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Russell Frank, Ph.D.
Director II
Assessment and Accountability
Services
Mike Barney
Director II
Instructional Services
LCFF and LCAP Reshapes School
Funding and Accountability
Part I: LCFF
Russ FrankRCOE
Resources• School Services of California• Legislative Analyst’s Report• WestEd
• Special Thanks to:• Nancy Sheets: Director II, RCOE• Paul Jessup: Deputy Superintendent, RCOE• Bill Spires: Director II, RCOE• Art Davis: RSDSS Director, Madera County
Office of Education• Janelle Kubinec: Director, National and
State Special Projects, WestED
Outcomes
1. Understand how the components of LCFF return districts to 07-08 funding over time
2. Discuss the implications for districts
3. Pose questions for follow up.
Local Control Funding Formula Components
1. Target Base Rates Per 4 Grade Spans2. Adjusted Base Rates for CSR and CTE3. Supplemental Funding for any EL or LI4. Concentration Funding for ELs and LIs
above 55% of total enrollment5. TIIG Add-On6. HTS Transportation Add-On7. Economic Recovery Target Add-On8. “Commitment” to close the gap and
COLA
Formula Components of the LCFF: 1
Target Base Rates• Per ADA in CALPADS
• K-3: $6,845• 4-6 $6,947• 7-8 $7,154• 9-12$8,289
• It’s like the revenue limits of old.
Basic Rate for All Kids
Per ADA in CALPADSK-3: $6,8454-6 $6,9477-8 $7,1549-12 $8,289
* Basic Rate for All Kids* Like a the Old Revenue Limit
Formula Components of the LCFF: 1
Formula Components of the LCFF: 2
Adjusted Base Rates (ABR)
• Let’s keep class sizes low in K-3 -- 24-1 or negotiated level:
• Add 10.4 percent of the base rate.
• It costs more to educate 9-12 -- Targets CTE
• Add 2.6 percent of the base rate.
CSR K-3 and CTE 9-12
Provisions for K-3 CSR Adjustment• K-3 CSR at 24-1
by 20-21 • Unless CSR is
collectively bargained otherwise
• If negotiated at a different rate, LEA not subject to provision.
• If class size larger than 24 LEA must make progress toward reducing the gap by 10 % annually during transition.
Formula Components of the LCFF: 3
Supplemental Funding• The following
subgroups offer more challenges to educators:
• Low Income (LI) or what we used to call SED.
• Foster Youth as LI• English Learners
• Add 20% of the ABR per eligible student
SED or Low Income (LI) & English Learners ELs
Calculating Supplemental Funding
• Foster Youth are LI• EL/LI calculated on 3
year rolling average from CALPADS taken from CBEDS.
• 2013 CBEDS for 13-14 LCFF
• Unduplicated count. An EL who is low income = 1 student.
Dilemma of Reclassification• Student Reclassified as FEP
who is NOT also LI no longer generates extra $$$. LCAP Connection.
Supplemental Follow up
• Challenge: districts need to find out what their unduplicated 13-14 counts are.
Think About It• What are the
implications for your district?
• What questions arise for you?
• Share these thoughts with your partners
Formula Components of the LCFF: 4
Concentration Funding• High concentrations
of ELs and LI present an even greater challenge for LEAs.
• Each unduplicated LI or EL above 55% of enrollment generates 50% of the ABR
For Districts with many ELs & LI
Will You Get Concentration Funding?
LEA Ensures “Proportionality”
“Increase or improve services for ELs/LIs in proportion to the increase in funds apportioned on the basis of the number and concentration of unduplicated pupils”
?
LCFF and LCAP Templates
• WestEd and CDE role
• Fiscal Guidance by January 30, 2014
• Preview of Fiscal and LCAP by November 6-7 2013?
• RCOE Preview Nov. 21, 2013
• LCAP Template by March 30, 2013
Think About It• What are the
implications for your district?
• What questions arise for you?
• Share these thoughts with your partners
Formula Components of the LCFF: 5Targeted Instr. Improve. Grant• If received in 12-13
will receive again through 20-21.
• Can be used for any educational purpose.
• See list of RC districts
First of Three Add-Ons
Formula Components of the LCFF: 6
Home/School Transportation (HTST)• If LEA received
HTST in 12-13 it will receive again through 2020-21.
• Restricted to transporting eligible students.
• See list of RC districts.
Second of Three Add-Ons
Formula Components of the LCFF: 7
Economic Recovery Target (ERT)
• In the transition from 2007-08 formula to LCFF, some LEAs (230) lose funding due to their former concentrations of categorical funds.
• ERT is like a hold harmless for these LEAs.
• = increase each year for 8 years
• Likely no ERTs in RC
Third of Three Add-Ons
2013-14 Categorical Survivors
Formula Components of the LCFF: 8
Gap Funding1. Fully funding LCFF in
one year would cost $18 billion.
2. Target: Let’s get back to 2007-08 Levels
3. Gap funding “Commit-ment”: Aimed at closing each LEA’s difference between the 20-21 target funding and 13-14 funding by 12% annually.
8 Years to Close Funding Gap
TARGET
TARGET
TARGET
LCFF Funding
LCFF Funding
Getting to the TargetsLeverage for Closing the Gap
• “Commitment” to funding gap closing
• COLA increases to the Base Rate
• P1 in December: LEAs paint the first fuzzy picture of the increases.
• P2 in April: LEAs should generate a clearer idea of increase.
LCFF/LCAP Summary• Reforms
state’s much criticized funding mechanism.
• Far greater LEA flexibility on meeting student need.
• More meaningful stakeholder input during development.
Major Shifts Made by the Local Control Funding Formula
Before LCFF• Revenue Limits
• State categoricals w/temporary tiered flex
• K-3 CSR: Limited funding with unlimited class sizes
• Accountability and performance separate from funding
After LCFF• LCFF base funding dif-
ferentiated by grade span.
• Unduplicated pupil weights, concentration funding
• K-3 CSR targeting 24-1
• Local Control Accountability Plans required. (July 1, 2014)
What Stays the Same?
• Financial Audits• Compliance with Williams• School Accountability Report
Cards• Federal funding, planning and
accountability• LEA as subgrantee of the state
Downside?• Economic
downturn.• Low income
districts vulnerable.
• Prop 30 phase outs: 2016, 18
• In 20-21 gets us to where we were in 07-08.
Think About It
• What are the implications for your district?
• What questions arise for you?
• Share these thoughts with your partners