LCA Bioethanol

  • Upload
    mime84

  • View
    233

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    1/15

    Gurbakhash S. Bhander & Anthony HalogForest Bio-products Research Initiatives (FBRI),

    School of Forest Resources, Nutting Hall,

    University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5755;email: [email protected]

    Life Cycle Assessment ofbio-ethanol

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    2/15

    Gurbakhash S. Bhander PhD, Eng. Eng.School of Forest Resources, 5755 Nutting Hall,

    Goal of Study

    2

    The goal of this case study is:to perform cradle-to-gate life cycle

    assessment of bio-ethanol productionfrom hemicellulose extraction process toevaluate the potential human health and

    ecological impacts associated with theproducts system

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    3/15

    Gurbakhash S. Bhander PhD, Eng. Eng.School of Forest Resources, 5755 Nutting Hall,

    System Description

    3

    Acetic AcidPulp/Paper

    ChipEthanol

    E. Coli K011

    Enzymes

    A technical analysis is performed for a new process at FBRI that isolates

    chemical feedstock (mainly hemicellulose material) from the hardwood inaddition to hardwood Kraft pulp production.

    This new process termed the near neutral hemicellulose extraction

    process, involves the extraction of wood hemicellulose using green liquor

    and white liquor prior to Kraft pulping.

    The extracted material is cooked and converted into bio-ethanol, acetic acidand other co-products.

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    4/15

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    5/15

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    6/15

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    7/15

    Gurbakhash S. Bhander PhD, Eng. Eng.School of Forest Resources, 5755 Nutting Hall,

    System Boundaries (Conti.)

    7

    The product boundaries cover cradle-to-gate activities and

    assumptions made as follow. Energy produced from the Hog Fuel Boiler and Recovery Boiler is

    assumed to be used internally. Electricity consumption used for

    working activities is not included.

    Furfural (co-product) is used internally and therefore it is not

    assumed to be marketed.

    Gypsum (co-product), Ash disposal (Hog Fuel Boiler) and dregs

    (causticizing) are assumed to be landfilled in a mineral landfill.

    Industrial water (demineralized) is assumed to be used in washing,

    slaking and extraction process. Wastewater from the causticizing process is neglected.

    Odor from sulfide is neglected.

    Internal transportation & other small activities are not included.

    Working environment is not included.

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    8/15

    Gurbakhash S. Bhander PhD, Eng. Eng.School of Forest Resources, 5755 Nutting Hall,

    Data Specification & Sources

    9

    Product

    Specific

    Site

    Specific General 1 2 3 4 5 Comments

    Raw wood extractionWood

    procurement

    Ecoinvent- database

    Chip Production Ecoinvent- database

    Hog Fuel Boiler Ecoinvent- database

    Electricity recovery BUWAL 250 database

    Production of ethanol, pulp & acetic acid

    Extraction Inputs data on electricity,

    ancillary substance,

    consumables is estimated

    from a model developed

    for extraction process in

    WinGEMS software.

    Further datasets the life

    cycle of used materials and

    ancillary substance etc is

    used from BUWAL and

    ecoinvent database.

    Kraft pulping

    Washing

    Evaporation

    Recovery Boiler

    Slaking

    (Causticizing)

    WL storage

    Evaporation

    Acid Hydrolyze

    Lignin Filtration

    Liquid Extraction

    Liming & Filtration

    Fermentation

    Ethanol & Acetic

    Acid Separation

    Disposal Material

    Landfill Ecoinvent- database

    Disposal route Ecoinvent- database

    Transportation

    Transportation Ecoinvent- database

    Note:

    1. Measurements

    2. Computation (from massbalance consideration andinput data for process of concern

    3. Data obtained from similartype or technology

    4. Data obtained from differenttype or process

    5. ApproximationProductspecific data: Processesspecifically concern with thehandling of gold

    Site-specific data: Data of interest obtained from actualsites in the product

    system of gold, but inventory of

    process data is not specified.General data: All others

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    9/15

    Gurbakhash S. Bhander PhD, Eng. Eng.School of Forest Resources, 5755 Nutting Hall,

    Results (Normalized)

    10

    Raw Material & Manufacturing Stage Landfill (Ash & Gypsum)

    24%76%

    Life Cycle Assessment of bio-ethanol (Cradle-to-Gate)

    PersonEquivlant

    (PE)

    Impact Categories

    10% improvement optimization

    in landfill materials:

    Gypsum,

    Ash

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    10/15

    Gurbakhash S. Bhander PhD, Eng. Eng.School of Forest Resources, 5755 Nutting Hall,

    Results (Normalized)

    11

    LCA of bio-ethanol (Compare the Extraction Process)

    Allocation 7% of the pulp production,

    47% of the acetic acid production,

    P

    ersonEquivla

    nt(PE)

    Impact categories

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    11/15

    Gurbakhash S. Bhander PhD, Eng. Eng.School of Forest Resources, 5755 Nutting Hall,

    Results (Normalized)

    12

    LCA of bio-ethanol (Compare Processes)

    Processes: Wood yard (Red),

    Lime burning (light Blue),

    Recovery boiler (Green),

    Extraction (Blue).

    P

    ersonEquivla

    nt(PE)

    Impact categories

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    12/15

    Gurbakhash S. Bhander PhD, Eng. Eng.School of Forest Resources, 5755 Nutting Hall,

    Sensitivity Analysis (Normalized)

    13

    LCA of bio-ethanol (10% Improvement optimization)

    Processes: Wood yard,

    Lime burning,

    Recovery boiler,

    Extraction.

    PersonEquivlan

    t(PE)

    Impact categories

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    13/15

    Gurbakhash S. Bhander PhD, Eng. Eng.School of Forest Resources, 5755 Nutting Hall,

    Conclusions

    14

    We have learned from the study that wood yard, wood extraction, limeburning and recovery boiler are the significant processes in the system: Wood yard (raw materials stage) is a main contributor (29%). Fuel

    consumption (transportation and cutting activities) is the main material

    that contributes to all significant impact categories.

    The fuel oil consumption in the lime burning process contributesignificantly (ethane & methane) to human toxicity.

    Anthraquinone (AQ) material used in the extraction process contributeshuman toxicity and radioactive waste.

    Heavy metals emission (dioxin, lead, arsenic, nickel etc) in the recoveryboiler process contributes to human toxicity.

    The gypsum co-product (landfill material) contributes to bulk waste andAsh disposal contributes to human toxicity and others impact categories.

    Overall bio-ethanol contributes to 4.8PE, 3.1PE and 2.6PE to humantoxicity, soil, air and water, 3.8PE to bulk waste, 2.2PE to global warmingand 1.4PE to ozone depletion and formation and 1.9PE to radioactivewaste.

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    14/15

    Gurbakhash S. Bhander PhD, Eng. Eng.School of Forest Resources, 5755 Nutting Hall,

    Further Improvements

    15

    Most of the data are used from the different databases. Site-

    specific data collection will be the first priority.

    Research will also be extended on wood chip production and site

    specific data will be collected from contractors & other sources.

    The lime burning process data and assumptions will be

    improved. Anthraquinone (AQ) material input is an optional input to the

    extraction process, avoiding AQ material will improve the

    extraction process significantly.

    Outputs emissions data will be improved for the recovery boiler

    process and new air emission cleaning techniques will be

    evaluated.

    Bio-ethanol production will be compared with its fossil based

    and agricultural based counterparts.

  • 7/28/2019 LCA Bioethanol

    15/15

    Gurbakhash S. Bhander PhD, Eng. Eng.

    THANK YOU

    FOR LISTENING!

    Any Question?

    16