1
NATURE|Vol 436|28 July 2005 BOOKS & ARTS 463 history may get the impression that objective scientific factors did not have much influence on the success of physics, although that is not the author’s position. While acknowledging the importance of mathematics in the devel- opment of theoretical physics, he provides few equations and no discussion of any mathemat- ical concepts or techniques; this may please some readers but it fails to convey an under- standing of what theoretical physicists such as Hermann von Helmholtz, James Clerk Maxwell and Augustin-Jean Fresnel were actually doing. Why did physics rather than chemistry become the leading science by 1900? The author’s answer is fourfold. First, physics was credited with establishing the law of energy conservation, the most important discovery in nineteenth-century physical science. This law governed all the physical and biological sciences, and was even believed to explain why women should not do scientific research. Some nineteenth-century scientists argued that “only so much energy could be contained in a woman’s body. Its proper purpose was to be directed towards childbirth and nurturing.” Second, Morus believes that the math- ematical aspects of physics “made laboratory work respectable for the sons of gentlemen”, thereby overcoming class prejudice against the manual labour needed to do experimental science. Third, “its connexions with the world of telegraph cables, electric power, and factory engines made it a practical occupation for the sons of trade”. The final reason that Morus gives for the rise of physics is that it gained favourable notice from public demonstrations and exhibits, especially of electrical phenomena, and from applications that benefited industry, government and citizens. For those scientists and others fascinated by “mysterious fluids and forces” at the end of the nineteenth cen- tury, he says, the electromagnetic-wave exper- iments of Heinrich Hertz not only confirmed the remarkable prediction from Maxwell’s equations of their existence and properties, but also “demonstrated graphically the physicists’ power to manipulate nature, to make things happen as if by magic”. Going back up the causal chain, we learn that the University of Cambridge began to stress advanced mathematics because, at the beginning of the nineteenth century, that was the only subject to be tested by written examinations leading to public honours. Attaining such honours was the best way to enter a career in government service in the expanding British Empire. Success in the mathematical tripos examination was sup- posed to demonstrate the moral and mental characteristics needed for such service. Prep- aration for this very competitive examination provided excellent training for research in theoretical physics. Then, around 1870, despite strong univer- sity opposition, a laboratory for experimental work was established. This was only possible because William Cavendish, Duke of Devon- shire, who had himself attained high honours in mathematics, was chancellor of the univer- sity and paid for the laboratory himself. The Cavendish Laboratory got off to an excellent start with the efforts of Maxwell, its first director, and so the University of Cambridge became a world leader in both theoretical and experimental physics. A similar story, com- bining social and personal factors, can be told about the rise of physics in Germany. It is impossible to cover all the important aspects of nineteenth-century physics in a text of fewer than 300 pages. However, a serious omission from Why Physics Became King is the establishment of the existence and quantita- tive properties of atoms. The contributions of Avogadro, Loschmidt, Perrin and others are ignored. Although in the nineteenth century the atom may have been more important to chemistry than to physics, it was thanks to physical theories (especially the kinetic theory of gases) that the speeds, masses and sizes of atoms could be determined. This transformed a philosophical speculation into a legitimate scientific concept and expanded the kingdom of physics into fertile new territory. Stephen G. Brush is professor of the history of science in the Department of History and Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA. Laying down the laws When Physics Became King by Iwan Rhys Morus University of Chicago Press: 2005. 288 pp. $60, £42 (hbk); $25, £17.50 (pbk) Stephen G. Brush When did physics become king? And what is its kingdom? According to Iwan Rhys Morus, a lecturer in history at the University of Wales, it was during the nineteenth century that physics became the most powerful and prestigious science in the United Kingdom and Germany. That does not necessarily mean that other sciences bowed down to physics — the only other sciences he mentions are chemistry and astronomy, both of which had been dominant in the early part of the century. Apparently, chemistry failed to keep up with physics, while astronomy became more and more dependent on physical instruments and theories. This is a story about the ascendance of physics as viewed by the public and, more importantly, by government and industry. As Morus puts it, physics became “the ultimate authority in nature”. It is a fascinating story, well told and mostly based on the latest research by professional historians of science. But the approach is “unashamedly cultural”, or rather, social: high culture appears only in a chapter on romantic nature philosophy. Morus stresses the role of institutions such as universities, journals and public exhibitions, alongside events that depended on the actions of individuals. Readers who don’t have some background knowledge of physics and its EXHIBITION Snow business Wilson ‘Snowflake’ Bentley had a lifelong obsession with the intricate hexagonal symmetry of snowflakes. He produced more than 5,000 photo-micrographs, compiled in his 1931 landmark book Snow Crystals, and in other publications. An unseasonal exhibition at the New York Academy of Sciences, ‘One of a Kind’, pairs Bentley’s images with works on the same theme by contemporary artists, including Daniele Imperiale- Warner, whose egg tempera on parchment painting, Untitled, is shown here. The exhibition runs until 31 August. A.P. Nature Publishing Group ©2005

Laying down the laws

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

NATURE|Vol 436|28 July 2005 BOOKS & ARTS

463

history may get the impression that objectivescientific factors did not have much influenceon the success of physics, although that is notthe author’s position. While acknowledgingthe importance of mathematics in the devel-opment of theoretical physics, he provides fewequations and no discussion of any mathemat-ical concepts or techniques; this may pleasesome readers but it fails to convey an under-standing of what theoretical physicists such asHermann von Helmholtz, James Clerk Maxwelland Augustin-Jean Fresnel were actually doing.

Why did physics rather than chemistrybecome the leading science by 1900? Theauthor’s answer is fourfold. First, physics wascredited with establishing the law of energyconservation, the most important discovery in nineteenth-century physical science. Thislaw governed all the physical and biologicalsciences, and was even believed to explain whywomen should not do scientific research.Some nineteenth-century scientists arguedthat “only so much energy could be containedin a woman’s body. Its proper purpose was tobe directed towards childbirth and nurturing.”

Second, Morus believes that the math-ematical aspects of physics “made laboratorywork respectable for the sons of gentlemen”,thereby overcoming class prejudice against themanual labour needed to do experimental science. Third, “its connexions with the worldof telegraph cables, electric power, and factoryengines made it a practical occupation for thesons of trade”.

The final reason that Morus gives for therise of physics is that it gained favourable

notice from public demonstrations andexhibits, especially of electrical phenomena,and from applications that benefited industry,government and citizens. For those scientistsand others fascinated by “mysterious fluidsand forces” at the end of the nineteenth cen-tury, he says, the electromagnetic-wave exper-iments of Heinrich Hertz not only confirmedthe remarkable prediction from Maxwell’sequations of their existence and properties, but also “demonstrated graphically the physicists’power to manipulate nature, to make thingshappen as if by magic”.

Going back up the causal chain, we learnthat the University of Cambridge began tostress advanced mathematics because, at thebeginning of the nineteenth century, that was the only subject to be tested by writtenexaminations leading to public honours.Attaining such honours was the best way toenter a career in government service in theexpanding British Empire. Success in themathematical tripos examination was sup-posed to demonstrate the moral and mentalcharacteristics needed for such service. Prep-aration for this very competitive examinationprovided excellent training for research in theoretical physics.

Then, around 1870, despite strong univer-sity opposition, a laboratory for experimentalwork was established. This was only possiblebecause William Cavendish, Duke of Devon-shire, who had himself attained high honoursin mathematics, was chancellor of the univer-sity and paid for the laboratory himself. TheCavendish Laboratory got off to an excellentstart with the efforts of Maxwell, its first director, and so the University of Cambridgebecame a world leader in both theoretical andexperimental physics. A similar story, com-bining social and personal factors, can be toldabout the rise of physics in Germany.

It is impossible to cover all the importantaspects of nineteenth-century physics in a textof fewer than 300 pages. However, a seriousomission from Why Physics Became King is theestablishment of the existence and quantita-tive properties of atoms. The contributions ofAvogadro, Loschmidt, Perrin and others areignored. Although in the nineteenth centurythe atom may have been more important tochemistry than to physics, it was thanks tophysical theories (especially the kinetic theoryof gases) that the speeds, masses and sizes ofatoms could be determined. This transformeda philosophical speculation into a legitimatescientific concept and expanded the kingdomof physics into fertile new territory. ■

Stephen G. Brush is professor of the history ofscience in the Department of History andInstitute for Physical Science and Technology,University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.

Laying down the lawsWhen Physics Became Kingby Iwan Rhys MorusUniversity of Chicago Press: 2005. 288 pp.$60, £42 (hbk); $25, £17.50 (pbk)

Stephen G. BrushWhen did physics become king? And what isits kingdom?

According to Iwan Rhys Morus, a lecturer in history at the University of Wales, it wasduring the nineteenth century that physicsbecame the most powerful and prestigious science in the United Kingdom and Germany.

That does not necessarily mean that other sciences bowed down to physics — the onlyother sciences he mentions are chemistry andastronomy, both of which had been dominantin the early part of the century. Apparently,chemistry failed to keep up with physics, whileastronomy became more and more dependenton physical instruments and theories.

This is a story about the ascendance ofphysics as viewed by the public and, moreimportantly, by government and industry. AsMorus puts it, physics became “the ultimateauthority in nature”. It is a fascinating story,well told and mostly based on the latestresearch by professional historians of science.But the approach is “unashamedly cultural”, orrather, social: high culture appears only in achapter on romantic nature philosophy.

Morus stresses the role of institutions suchas universities, journals and public exhibitions,alongside events that depended on the actionsof individuals. Readers who don’t have somebackground knowledge of physics and its

EXHIBITION

Snow businessWilson ‘Snowflake’ Bentley hada lifelong obsession with theintricate hexagonal symmetryof snowflakes. He producedmore than 5,000 photo-micrographs, compiled in his 1931 landmark book Snow Crystals, and in otherpublications.

An unseasonal exhibition atthe New York Academy ofSciences, ‘One of a Kind’, pairsBentley’s images with works on the same theme bycontemporary artists,including Daniele Imperiale-Warner, whose egg tempera on parchment painting,Untitled, is shown here.

The exhibition runs until 31 August. A.P.

28.7 Books 461 MH 22/7/05 10:08 AM Page 463

Nature Publishing Group© 2005

© 2005 Nature Publishing Group