60 marks in 60 minutes = a minute per mark You have a choice of 2 source based questions The question is split into 3 parts as follows Part A – you must answer one 15 mark question

that will demonstrate AO1 knowledge and understanding by describing or illustrating an area of law.

Part B – focuses on demonstration of the AO2 skill of application and requires application of the law to 3 short scenario’s.

PART C has 2 sub questions, C(i) will again focus on AO1 knowledge and understanding and C (ii) will require AO2 analysis and evaluation by considering, discussing or explaining and will be linked to C (i)

The biggest mistake students make is choosing the question based solely upon the title, for example where the student favours statutory interpretation, the following title will seem attractive. “Exercise on statutory interpretation”

Making this choice without reading the source and the questions may result in getting through section A but getting stuck at section B/C.

It is common to see students stop half way through and turn their attentions to the other source wasting precious time and marks.

Judicial Precedent Describe ratio decidendi/obiter dicta; describe a type of precedent

e.g persuasive; Describe concept of stare decisis; describe the powers of the court of appeal; explain and illustrate use of the practice statement.

Legislation Describe the legislative process; types of bills; influences on

legislationDelegated Legislation Describe the 3 types of DL with case law; describe and illustrate

the reasons why DL is needed;’ controls on DL Statutory Interpretation Describe and illustrate one, two or three of the rules of statutory

interpretation; Explain the rules of language; Explain and illustrate the purposive approach

European Law Explain how the EC Treaty is part of UK Law; Describe 1 – all of

the EU institutions and their role; explain with illustration vertical and/or horizontal direct effect.

Law Reform Describe the role of the law commission

Judicial Precedent Decide how precedent will work in certain cases e.g: Decide if practice statement applies or if CA can depart from a decision based

on exceptions in Y v B; Decide if court is bound by a previous decision. Decide the best avoidance technique available to the court (distinguishing,

overruling, reversing)Legislation Identify the type of bill that would be used to legislate in a certain areaDelegated Legislation Identify most appropriate type of DL for the situation and explain why; Decide

and explain if Judicial review would be successful in a scenario.Statutory Interpretation Identify the correct aid to use in a situation (intrinsic/extrinsic and which one in

particular); Apply the three rules/purposive approach to a situation; which rule of language would be most appropriate/apply rules of language to a scenario/apply presumption of mens rea.

European Law Whether there is a need to make an Art 234 referral; application of

horizontal/direct effect. Law Reform Not been examined in section B so far.

Judicial Precedent See section A – usually similar and then link in with section

CiiLegislation See section A – usually similar and then link in with section

CiiDelegated Legislation Explain the need for DL; describe the controls of the court

and parliament over DLStatutory Interpretation Explain what Hansard, the previous ban and illustrate its

use; European Law Describe the effect of EU membership of UK law with case

law illustration Law Reform See section A

Judicial Precedent Whether CA powers to depart from own/HL’s decisions should be

extended; Whether practice statement should be extended to CA; advantages and disadvantages in giving more flexibility to courts to depart from previous decisions; advantages and disadvantages of precedent.

Legislation Evaluate the legislative processDelegated Legislation Advantages and disadvantages of DL; assess the effectiveness of

control over DLStatutory Interpretation Advantages and disadvantages of a rule of interpretation or the

purposive approach to interpretation; advantages and disadvantages of using Hansard/extrinsic aids

European Law Benefits/disadvantages of EU membership on English Law Law Reform The success/failure of law reform

Use the following annotations to mark the example given to you. Compare your annotations with your levels table and put the answer into a level.

Def = Definition BP = Bald Point P = point DP= developed point WDP = well developed point F = Feature C = Case LTS = Link to source

THINGS TO NOTE:

Cases must be illustrativeA feature = something about the area of law other than the definition e.g. The literal rule is the most traditional of the rules of SI.

Use the following annotations to mark the example given to you. Compare your annotations with your levels table and put the answer into a level.

IP= identification point (answer)RP = Relevant pointLTS = Link to source C = case

NB* CANDIDATES WHO ‘HEDGE THEIR BETS’ WILL GAIN NO MARKS.

A DECISION MUST BE MADE

CANDIDATES SHOULD AVOID IRRELEVANT DETAIL

Use the following annotations to mark the example given to you. Compare your annotations with your levels table and put the answer into a level.

Def = Definition BP = Bald PointP = pointDP= developed pointWDP = well developed point F = FeatureC = Case

Use the following annotations to mark the example given to you. Compare your annotations with your levels table and put the answer into a level.

GD = Good discussion AD = Adequate discussion LD = limited discussion BP = Bald Point P = point DP= developed point WDP = well developed point C = Case LTS

AVOID BULLET POINTS

Bald Points without explanations will remain in Level 2.

ACCURACY: Make sure that you only include information that is required for the question.

THOROUGHNESS By planning your answer you can work out how much time to give each part e.g. What to fully explain, and where to be concise.

FLUENCY: If you plan your answer before you start, you can ensure that you don’t miss bits out and have to put a see later note.

EXEMPLIFICATION: Use examples where ever appropriate. Cases must be illustrative. It is the law that is important.

ANSWERS: Answer the question that is set. Don’t write everything you know in the hope that some of it is relevant 

Plan your answers before you start writing. Don’t cross them out and keep referring back to it. Underline to indicate where your answer starts.

Use the correct terminology. The date of a case is not that important, unless

you are illustrating how the law was developed. Statute dates are more important.

Assume the examiner knows nothing. A grade ‘A’ student tends to write less in their

answer because they know what is relevant to the question opposed to students who write everything they know in the hope that some of it is correct.

Remember: The examiner knows that you are nervous. The examiner will mark in the knowledge

that it was written in exam conditions.

GOOD LUCK!!!