7/21/2019 Latest! Poster!

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/latest-poster 1/1

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING ANDQUALITY OF WORK LIFE

INTRODUCTION

orkplace bullying refers to situations where a person repeatedly and over a period ofme is exposed to negative acts (i.e. constant abuse, oensive remarks or teasing,dicule or social exclusion) on the part of coworkers, supervisors, or subordinatesinarsen, !!!)

uality of work life focuses on providing opportunities for employees to make meaningfulontributions to their organi#ation.

MINDBLOWING

$%&'% *++-

/'%0 1%2%'+&&

3 +' 22%3 1/& %$0

1+%1%& -%'22+% %2%'

-%'% +'%'% 1/& 4%--'

METHODOLOGY 

'esearch design5 correlation and descriptive study

-rom 6! 7uestionnaires distributed to 8 companies around 0lang 9alley, only : that we getback

ampling techni7ue5 convenient sampling method

"uestionnaires for workplace bullying is adapted from %";' $* Enarsen < kogstad, (=>>?)in 3suno, 0., 0awakami, ., noue, %., < %be, 0. (!=!) with @A.>B. items using the ratingscale C=Anever to BAdaily.D

"uestionnaire for employee 7uality of work life is adapted from Easton, . < aar, &. 9. (!=)with @A.>=. 6 items using the rating scale C=Astrongly disagree to BAstrongly agree.D

&ata collection method5 drop and collect

OBJECTIVES

=. 3o describe the level of employeesFworkplace bullying

. 3o describe the level of employeesF7uality of work life

:. 3o compare employee 7uality ofwork life by gender

6. 3o determine the relationshipbetween workplace bullying and7uality of work life

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

3able =5 &emographic proGleVariable Fre!e"#$ Per#e"%a&

eGe"'er

1ale

-emale

 

=!

==>

 

6B.I

B:.6A&e 1inimumA

!

1aximumA

B8

1eanA

:.?

& A 8.===

A&e Gr(!)

!;>.6

>.B;:8.>

:>;68.6

68.B;B8

 

=!!

 ?>

::

=:

66.8

:!.>

=6.8

B.8Ra#e

1alay

ndian

Jhinese

/thers

E'!#a%i("al

le*el

K&L1aster

$achelor

&iploma

3K1LJL%;

evel

K1L/;level

K1'

 

=I?

=B

6

 

=>

===

6I

>

:

 

I8.>

>.>

?.I

=.8

 

8.B

6>.8

=.=

6.!

=6.:

!.>

Se#%(r (+

I"'!,%r$

Kublic

Krivate

tatutory

body

=I

=!?

>:

 

I.?

6I.B

6=.I

Variable Fre!e"#$ Per#e"%a&e Year, (+ ,er*i#e i"

%-i, (r&a"i.a%i(" 

1inimumA

!.?I

1aximumA

B8

1ean A I.>

& A 8.>

  Year, (+ ,er*i#e

i" %-i,

(r&a"i.a%i("

/#a%e&(rie,0

!.?I;=6.>

  =B;>.

  >.:;6:.B

  6:.?;B8

 

=86

=I

>

=

 

8.B

I.?

6.!

!.6

 Year, (+ ,er*i#e

,i"#e 1r,%e2)l($2e"%

1inimumA =

1aximumA:I

1ean A I.>8

& A 8.==

 Year, (+ ,er*i#e

,i"#e 1r,%

e2)l($2e"%

/#a%e&(rie,0

  =;=

  =:;6

  B;:I

 

=?6

:

=B

I:.B

=!.:

?.I

E2)l($2e"%

#a%e&(r$

  1anagement

  on;management

  Krofessional

  /thers

 

=6?

66

=?

=

 

?B.B

=>.I

I.

!.6

OBJECTIVE 3 4 5

  3able 5 evel of workplace bullying and employee

7uality of work life

-indings5 3he table shows there is a low level ofworkplace bullying in the organi#ation, and moderatelevel of employees 7uality of work life

Variable, + 6 Mea" SDLe*el (+ 7(r8)la#e b!ll$i"&   =.6>?= !.8

6=.!! ow evel of W$(=.!! ; .?B) !

I

>.

8

 

.!! 1oderate evel of W$ (.?B

M 6.:)

=B ?.I

:.!! igh evel of W$ (6.:: ;

?.!!)

= .6

Mea" SDLe*el (+ !ali%$ (+ 7(r8 li+e   :.?:: !.B!>

I=.!! ow evel of "W (=.!! ;

.:)

= .6

.!! 1oderate evel of "W

(.:: M :.?B)

==

B

6I.

=

 

:.!! igh evel of "W (:.?? ;

B.!!)

=!

I

B.

B

 

OBJECTIVE 9

  3able :5 3o compare on workplace bullying betweengender using t;test analysis

-indings5 %n independent sample t;test was performed toexamine the dierence on workplace bullying amongmale and female employees in an organi#ation as shownin 3able :. 3he results indicated that the mean score ofworkplace bullying among male employees (MA:.?!=:,SDA!.6>86) not signiGcantly dierent than the meanscore of the workplace bullying among female employees(MA:.?6?6, SDA!.66>B), t  (:) A;!.I!?:, p N !.!B. 3heGnding shows whether male or female employees havee7ual tendency to involved in workplace bullying.

Variable, " Mea" SD % )

Ge"'er   ;!.I!?: !.B66I

Male =! :.?!=: !.6>86

Fe2ale ==> :.?6?6 !.66>B

OBJECTIVE :

ble 65 Jorrelations between workplace bullying and employeesF 7uality of work life

p P !.!B, OO p P !.!=

ndings5 % Kearson correlation analysis was performed to test the relationship between workplacellying (1 A =.!I?, & A !.86) and employee 7uality of work life (1 A .B!, & A !.B!>?)shown in 3able 6. -or an alpha level of .!B, the results of the correlation show that there is a

gniGcant (report the strength of relationship according to Quildford rule of thumb) low negativelationship between workplace bullying and 7uality of work life, r (:) A ;!.6B, p P .!B. 3hisdicates that decrease in workplace bullying will increase the employee 7uality of work life.

ble B5 'egression 1odel on the relationship between workplace bullying and employeesF 7ualitywork life

regression analysis was further performed to determine the inRuence of workplace bullying onality of work life 3he result revealed a signiGcant inRuence of workplace bullying on 7uality of

ork life (S A ;!.6?8 p A P .!B). Workplace bullying explained =.>T variance in 7uality of worke.

Variable Mea" SD W(r8)la#e

B!ll$i"&

Q!ali%$ (+ W(r8

Li+eW(r8)la#e B!ll$i"& =.!I? !.86 ; ;!.6BOQ!ali%$ (+ W(r8 Li+e .B! !.B!>? ;!.6BO ;

Variable b SE b   R5

M('el 3  

!.=>C(",%a"% 6.8? !.!8>  

W(r8)la#e B!ll$i"& .I .!B ;!.6?8

F *al!e ?=.>8=

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

 3here is signiGcant relationship between workplacebullying and employeesF 7uality of work life.

 3he decrease of workplace bullying will increase theemployeesF 7uality of work life.

Workplace bullying is a crucial issue to be concernedin order to ensure the 7uality of work life.

'E-E'EJE

&evonish, &. (!=:). Workplace bullying , employeeperformance and behaviors 3he mediating role ofpsychological well;being. Employee 'elations, :B(?),?:!M?6I. http5LLdoi.orgL=!.==!8LE';!=;!=:;!!!6