Upload
others
View
18
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis
Prof. Dr. med. Dierk Scheinert
Division of Interventional Angiology
University-Hospital Leipzig, Germany
Conflicts of Interest
2
Advisory Board /Consultant:
Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Cordis,
CR Bard, Gardia Medical, Medtronic/Covidien,
TriReme Medical, Trivascular, Upstream Peripheral
Technologies
LEVANT 2 Study Design
Extensive Blinding Steps Taken to Reduce Bias
Randomization 30 days 6 months 12 months
Treating
Physician
Not Blinded
LEVANT 2 was designed to ensure blinding of the
evaluating physician and DUS Tech at every phase including 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months
Blinded
•Patient
•Core Labs
•Patient
•Core Labs
•DUS Tech
•Evaluating
physician
•Patient
•Core Labs
•DUS Tech
•Evaluating
physician
•Patient
•Core Labs
•DUS Tech
•Evaluating
physician
LEVANT 2 RCT (N=476) Primary Patency
Full Wall Apposition Showed Increased Primary Patency at 12 Months*
A post-hoc subgroup analysis suggests the full wall apposition of the Lutonix® 035 Drug Coated Balloon (minimum 1.04:1 balloon-to-artery ratio of the treatment device) showed increased primary patency of 79.9% (at 12 months Kaplan Meier, not pre-specified). Primary patency is defined as absence of binary restenosis defined by DUS PSVR ≥2.5 and freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR). Primary safety by treatment balloon / artery ratio <1 was 85.8% (DCB) and 82.1% (PTA). Primary safety by treatment balloon / artery ratio >1 was 79.3% (DCB) and 75.5% (PTA). Warning: Do not exceed Rated Burst Pressure.
6
LEVANT 2 Full Wall Apposition
Sub Group
≥1 .04: 1 Balloon to Artery Ratio
LEVANT 2 Clinical Trial
Average 0.9:1
Balloon to Artery Ratio
Procedural Techniques for Optimal Drug Delivery
Balloon Transit Time
Balloon Inflation Pressure
Balloon Inflation Time
Final % Diameter Stenosis
Indicators from Levant 2 Data Analysis
Observations from LEVANT 2 suggest 12 month Primary Patency maybe positively influenced by
LEVANT 2 DCB Procedural Variable Analysis
Subgroup
Test DCB
%(n/N)
[95% CI]
Control PTA
%(n/N)
[95% CI]
Difference
% [95% CI] P-value1
Meet 3 criteria: stenosis, pressure,
inflation
78.6% (22/28)
[63.4, 93.8]
53.3% (8/15)
[28.1, 78.6]
25.2%
[-4.2, 54.7]
0.090
Meet all 4 criteria 91.7% (11/12)
[76.0, 100.0]
53.3% (8/15)
[28.1, 78.6]
38.3%
[8.6, 68.0]
0.023
62%
Pressure >
7 ATM
68%
Final
Residual
Stenosis <
20%
74%
Transit time < 30
sec
65%
Inflation time ≥ 120
sec
65%
75%
69%
77%
84% 82% 92%
79%
85%
Post-hoc, sub-group analysis suggests that DCB 12 M Primary Patency may be: Improved with 3 variables Optimal with all 4 variables
n=27
n=28
n=22 n=19 n=12
LEVANT 2 PTA Procedural Variable Analysis
Pressure >
7 ATM
Final
Residual
Stenosis <
20%
Inflation
time ≥ 120
sec
59% Levant 2 sub-group analysis suggests that a similar effect was not observed with PTA
n=29
n=32 n=45
n=15 63% 44%
53%
German Sub-Group Analysis
Angiographic Characteristics German vs. non-German Cohorts
German Non-German
Two Lesions Treated, % (n/N) 1.6% (2/126) 2.6% (9/350)
DeNovo Target Vessel, % (n/N) 88.9% (112/126) 83.7% (293/350)
Number of Patent Run-Off Vessels 1.7 ± 1.2 (126) 2.1 ± 0.9 (350)
Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD), mm 4.8 ± 0.8 (126) 4.8 ± 0.8 (350)
Lesion Length, mm 57.7 ± 41.0 (126) 64.7 ± 40.9 (349)
Treated Length, mm 100.3 ± 45.5 (126) 110.6 ± 48.3 (350)
Total Occlusions, % (n/N) 23.0% (29/126) 20.3% (71/350)
Calcification, % (n/N) 60.3% (76/126) 58.3% (204/350)
Severe Calcification, % (n/N) 11.1% (14/126) 9.1% (32/350)
Most Distal Lesion Location, % (n/N)
Proximal SFA 7.1% (9/126) 9.4% (33/350)
Mid SFA 51.6% (65/126) 48.6% (170/350)
Distal SFA 33.3% (42/126) 32.6% (114/350)
Proximal Popliteal 2.4% (3/126) 5.4% (19/350)
Mid Popliteal 4.8% (6/126) 3.1% (11/350)
Distal Popliteal 0.8% (1/126) 0.9% (3/350)
German Non-German
Contralateral Access, % (n/N) 57.9% (73/126) 79.1% (277/350)
Predilation Performed (All Lesions), % (n/N) 100.0% (126/126) 100.0% (350/350)
Maximum %DS Post-Predilation, Pre-Treatment 41.8 ± 13.0 (121) 40.9 ± 13.1 (347)
Total Paclitaxel on DCB Balloons Used per Subject (mg) 3.2 ± 1.6 (83) 3.7 ± 1.8 (233)
Transit Time 21.8 ± 11.9 (105) 39.5 ± 29.3 (327)
Inflation Time per Balloon (seconds) 129.8 ± 74.3 (157) 167.4 ± 91.7 (455)
Max Pressure of Treatment Balloons (atm) 9.0 ± 2.2 (157) 7.7 ± 2.1 (455)
Treatment Overstretch (inflated diameter/RVD) 0.9 ± 0.2 (106) 0.9 ± 0.2 (333)
Dissections, % (n/N)
Grade A 36.5% (46/126) 38.3% (133/347)
Grade B 31.7% (40/126) 21.3% (74/347)
Grade C 1.6% (2/126) 5.2% (18/347)
Post-dilatation PTA, % (n/N) 17.5% (22/126) 22.3% (78/350)
Provisional Bailout Stenting, % (n/N) 6.3% (8/126) 3.1% (11/350)
Procedural Embolism, % (n/N) 1.6% (2/126) 0.9% (3/350)
Diameter Stenosis (post-procedure), %DS 19.4 ± 10.4 (126) 21.5 ± 9.7 (349)
Procedural Success (All Lesions), % (n/N) 90.5% (114/126) 87.4% (305/349)
Procedural Characteristics German vs. non-German Cohorts
Primary Patency Kaplan Meier
Efficacy,
Primary Patency Lutonix
DCB (N=83)
Standard
PTA (N=43) Difference P-value
@365 days 79.4% 57.8% 21.6% 0.015
Prim
ary
Pate
ncy (
%)
Test DCB Control PTA
Time
days
Survival
%
Events
n
at Risk
n
Survival
%
Events
n
at Risk
n
log
rank P
30 91.5% 7 74 88.1% 5 37 0.574
183 88.9% 9 68 76.2% 10 30 0.076
365 79.4% 16 50 57.8% 17 19 0.015
Freedom from TLR Kaplan Meier
Efficacy,
Primary Patency Lutonix
DCB (N=83)
Standard
PTA (N=43) P-value
@365 days 96.1% 82.0% 0.012
Test DCB Control PTA
Time
days
Survival
%
Events
n
at Risk
n
Survival
%
Events
n
at Risk
n
log
rank P
30 98.8% 1 80 100.0% 0 41 0.480
183 98.8% 1 76 92.6% 3 36 0.080
365 96.1% 3 63 82.0% 7 28 0.012
Global SFA Real-World Registry 12 Month Outcomes
Global SFA Registry Procedural Analysis
20,9
14,6
LEVANT 2 (N=316) Global SFA (N=680)
Final % DS**
7,8
9,7
LEVANT 2 (N=432) Global SFA (N=674)
Balloon Inflation Pressure* (ATM)
** – Maximum % DS Mean ± sd (n) * – Maximum balloon pressure Mean ± sd (n)
Measure Lutonix DCB
% (n/N)
Freedom from TLR 94.3% (595/631)
30 Day Safety 99.7% (677/678)
Lutonix Global SFA Real-World Registry 12 Month Results
Lutonix Global SFA Real-World Registry Sub-group Analysis Long Lesions
(140 – 500 mm)
All Lesions
(23 – 500 mm)
Long Lesions
(140 – 500 mm)
Total Lesion Length (mm) 101.2 ± 84.2 (685) 212.3 ± 65.3 (140)
Treated Length (mm) 136.6 ± 89.7(685) 235.8 ± 74.0 (140)
Calcification, % (n/N) 50.2% (238/474) 57.5% (46/80)
Total Occlusion, % (n/N) 31.2% (214/686) 42.1% (59/140)
Lesion Locations, % (n/N)
SFA, % (n/N) 70% (483/690) 66.4% (93/140)
Proximal Popliteal, % (n/N) 16.8% (116/690) 15.7% (22/140)
Mid & Distal Popliteal, % (n/N) 13.1% (91/690) 17.9% (25/140)
%DS post-treatment, % 14.6 ± 18.7 (680) 19.0 ± 21.0 (140)
Bail-out Stenting, % (n/N) 25.3% (174/689) 35.7% (50/140)
Dissection, % (n/N) 30.1% (135/448) 34.3% (48/140)
Baseline Lesion Characteristics All Lesions vs Long Lesions
(140 – 500 mm)
Measure All Lesions
% (n/N)
Long Lesions
% (n/N)
Freedom from TLR 94.3% (595/631) 93.7% (119/127)
30 Day Safety 99.7% (677/679) 100.0% (138/138)
12 Month Results All Lesions vs Long Lesions
(140 – 500 mm)
Freedom from TLR
Sub-group All Lesions
% (n/N)
Long Lesions
% (n/N)
Calcification 95.9% (213/222) 97.6% (41/42)
CTO 94.8% (184/194) 100.0% (51/51)
12 Month Sub-group Analysis
All Lesions vs Long Lesions (140 – 500 mm)
22
Freedom from TLR
Sub-Group Long Lesions
% (n/N)
Lesions >25cm 94.0% (47/50)
Lesions >25cm - No Bailout Stent 96.0% (24/25)
Lesions >25cm - With Bailout Stent 92.0% (23/25)
12 Month Sub-group Analysis
Long Lesions >25cm
Summary
23
• LEVANT 2 post-hoc sub-group analysis suggests that DCB 12 M Primary Patency maybe influenced by balloon Transit time, Inflation Pressure, Inflation Time and Final % Diameter Stenosis
• LEVANT 2 German cohort suggest that good DCB procedures result in durable long term clinical benefits
• Global SFA Registry showed favorable Freedom from TLR of at 12 months, including in: • females, calcified lesions and CTOs
• Long Lesions (140 – 500 mm)
• Global SFA Regisry interim data suggest sustained benefits at 24 months
Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis
Prof. Dr. med. Dierk Scheinert
Division of Interventional Angiology
University-Hospital Leipzig, Germany