Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
(The crash test videos you want to SEE!)
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS IN BRIDGE RAILS
Amy Smith, P.E., Bridge Division
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Table of Contents
2
Crash Testing Primer
New Rails
Rail Not Under Development
Rail Under Development
Summary
Resources for Bridge Rail Questions
1
2
3
4
5
6
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Crash Testing Primer
WHO and WHAT – Bridge railing BRG – Barriers DES – Sign mounts, work zone devices TRF – Mailbox mounts MNT
WHERE – TAMU Transportation Institute, Roadside Safety
WHY – FHWA requires – TxDOT Goal “Maintain a safe system”
3
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Crash Testing Primer
Testing criteria – Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH)
• Current • Implemented in 2009
– NCHRP Report 350 • Previous • These rails are still acceptable
– Why updated? • Recognizes changes in vehicles on roadway • CG moved up • Heavier car and pickup • More severe TL-4 criteria
4
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Crash Testing Primer
5
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
TxDOT bridge rail levels
Crash Testing Primer
6
Low speed High speed ≤ 45mph ≥ 50mph TL-2 * TL-3 *
TL-4 # TL-5
* minimum required by TxDOT policy
# recommended for bridges carrying the main lanes of interstate and divided highways
TL-4 rails – T221 – T223 – T551 – SSTR – C412
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Crash Testing Primer
7
Factors Evaluation Criteria Structural Adequacy Contain and redirect vehicle or bring to controlled
stop
Occupant Risk
No elements penetrating occupant compartment; Limits on deformation of occupant compartment Vehicle remains upright, with limited roll and pitch Limit on occupant impact velocity Limit on occupant ridedown acceleration
Vehicle Trajectory Vehicle exits the barrier within the exit box
What is a PASS or FAIL?
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Crash Testing Primer
8
What is a PASS or FAIL? What about if the bridge rail is damaged?
– Not a failing criteria for MASH – Can be a concern for BRG
• Increases the maintenance cost over life of installation
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
New Rails
T131RC Picket rail
9
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
New Rail –T131RC
T131RC – A retrofit rail used only on curbs – Replacement of the T101RC – Crash tested MASH TL-3, including guardrail transition tests – Test specimen included a lightly reinforced curb – 36” tall
10
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
New Rail – T131RC
11
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
New Rail – T131RC
12
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
New Rail – T131RC
13
Factors Evaluation Criteria
Structural Adequacy
Contain and redirect
Occupant Risk
Occupant compartment penetration Occupant compartment deformation
Vehicle upright
Occupant impact velocity
Occupant ridedown acceleration
Vehicle Trajectory
Exits within the exit box
Successful test results Curb and slab damage
– Hard to avoid
Guide drawing was issued November 2012
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – Picket Rail
Picket Rail – A 36” steel rail targeted for historic bridge preservation projects – Texas Historical Commission involved in the development – Crash tested for MASH TL-3
14
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – Picket Rail
15
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – Picket Rail
16
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – Picket Rail
Rail didn’t budge Little damage to slab, curb or rail Expect to see minimal maintenance
17
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – Picket Rail
18
Factors Evaluation Criteria
Structural Adequacy
Contain and redirect
Occupant Risk
Occupant compartment deformation
Vehicle upright
Occupant impact velocity
Occupant ridedown acceleration
Vehicle Trajectory
Exits within the exit box
Successful test results
Target to post as a standard November 2013 Currently considering a combination version for use with
sidewalk
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Not Under Development
T101 T131
19
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Not Under Development – T101
T101 needed to be tested for pickup – Rail only 27”, critical height in past testing – Tested for MASH TL-3 with pickup
20
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Not Under Development – T101
21
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Not Under Development – T101
22
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Not Under Development – T101
23
Unsuccessful test results – Pickup rolled excessively
Retired effective September 2012
Per Bridge Railing Manual – T101 can remain in place for certain work categories
BRG always encourages its replacement when possible
Factors Evaluation Criteria
Structural Adequacy
Contain and redirect
Occupant Risk
Occupant compartment deformation
Vehicle upright
Occupant impact velocity
Occupant ridedown acceleration
Vehicle Trajectory
Exits within the exit box
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Not Under Development – T131
T131 considered to replace T101 – Rail height 31” – Tested for MASH TL-3 with pickup
24
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Not Under Development – T131
25
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Not Under Development – T131
26
Unsuccessful test results – Pickup rolled over
Not pursued further
Factors Evaluation Criteria
Structural Adequacy
Contain and redirect
Occupant Risk
Occupant compartment deformation
Vehicle upright
Occupant impact velocity
Occupant ridedown acceleration
Vehicle Trajectory
Exits within the exit box
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development
T631 T221P
27
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – T631
T631 is a replacement for the T6 – T6 was retired
September 2012; only 27” tall
– New rail is 31” tall – Single W-beam on
weak posts – Crash tested for
MASH TL-2
28
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – T631
29
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – T631
30
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – T631
31
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – T631
32
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – T631
33
Factors Evaluation Criteria
Structural Adequacy
Contain and redirect
Occupant Risk
Occupant compartment deformation
Vehicle upright
Occupant impact velocity
Occupant ridedown acceleration
Vehicle Trajectory
Exits within the exit box
Successful test results No deck damage
Target to post as a standard November 2013 Estimated cost $23/LF Will be a maintenance cost associated
– Replacing posts – Replacing W-beam
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – T631
34
Successful T631 has spurred development of another rail – A TL-3 version for high speed application – A precedent exists in a similar rail tested elsewhere
If it works, would replace the T101 (& T131 that never made it)
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development
35
T221P – Precast version of the T221 – Bolts to bridge deck – Can be used in permanent or
temporary installation – Crash tested for MASH TL-3
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – T221P
36
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – T221P
37
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – T221P
38
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – T221P
39
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – T221P
40
Rotation of rail panel and slab overhang – Permanent deflection – Slab cracked
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – T221P
41
Occupant compartment deformation
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Rails Under Development – T221P
42
Factors Evaluation Criteria
Structural Adequacy
Contain and redirect
Occupant Risk
Occupant compartment deformation
Vehicle upright
Occupant impact velocity
Occupant ridedown acceleration
Vehicle Trajectory
Exits within the exit box
Unsuccessful test results Pickup snagged on rail
panel
Work is on-going to modify the design and re-test
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Summary
Already out Coming soon In the works T131RC Picket rail T221P
T631 High speed T631
43
TxDOT has a number of new rails that: – Meet updated crash test requirements – Meet broader range of needs – Provide more options
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Resources for Bridge Rail Questions
44
– What type should I use? – How tall are those rails? – How do I retrofit a rail on this bridge?
Resources
– Bridge Railing Manual • txdot.gov
– Bridge Railing Q&A • Crossroads BRG
– Standards Webpage • Retrofit guide drawings
– Webinar presentation • For C-Rail-R Guide Drawing • Posted on txdot.gov BRG
page
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Questions about bridge rails
45
Have more questions?
Latest Developments in Bridge Rails
Crash Testing Primer
Name Description Height TL Criteria T1F Stl Post w/Alum Tube & Opt Drains (33” tall) 33 3 MASH T1W Stl Post w/Stl Tube & Opt Drains (32” tall) 32 3 350 T221 Concrete Parapet (32” tall) 32 4 350 T223 Conc Bm & Post w/6’ Openings (32” tall) 32 4 350 T401 Concrete Parapet w/Stl Post and Rail (33” tall) 33 3 350 T402 Concrete Parapet w/Stl Post and Rail (42” tall) 42 3 350 T411 Conc Traf Rail w/Windows(Tx Classic)(32” tall) 32 2 350 T551 Concrete Safety F-Shape (32” tall) 32 4 350 T552 T551 w/Multiple Drain Slots (32” tall) 32 4 350 T66 Conc Bm, Post & Curb w/5.25’ Max Open (32” tall) 32 3 350 T77 Steel Post w/Two Elliptical Pipes (33” tall) 33 3 350
SSTR Conc Single Slope Traffic Rail (36” tall) 36 4 MASH T80HT Conc & Steel Heavy Truck Traffic Rail (50” tall) 50 5 350 T80SS Conc Single Slp Hvy Truck Traff Rail (42” tall) 42 5 350
C1W Steel Post w/Stl Tube & Opt Curb Drain (42” tall) 42 2 350 C221 T221 w/Steel Pipe Rail (42” tall) 42 2 350 C223 T223 w/Steel Pipe Rail (42” tall) 42 2 350 C402 T402 w/Steel Pipe Rail (42” tall) 42 3 350 C411 Comb Rail w/windows (Tx Classic) (42” tall) 42 2 350 C412 Conc Comb Rail w/Windows (TL-4) (42” tall) 42 4 350
T131RC Retrofit Guide for Curbed Structures 36 3 MASH
46
Current BRG Rail Inventory