Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Last Step to London: First step to Rio
Professor Frank Dick OBE
What we did in
London was a
consequence of all that we have done
from the flame dying in Beijing to the flame
dying in London.
The Games don’t finish
with the dying of the
flame; they finish when you have learned all
you can from the experience and turned it
into effective action in pursuit of delivering
excellence when the flame is lit again.
Probably the only sustainable
competitive advantage you have is
the ability to learn faster than the
opposition.
Arie de Geus
Essential Debrief Matters!
Prepare to learn (Strategy)
Be prepared to learn (Attitude)
Independent? – Mindset diversity
Results – intended v actual
Performance under pressure – Athletes, teams
Professional competence of staff (coaches, performance support, management, etc)
Effectiveness of preparation planning
Effectiveness of 4-year, Olympic year, applied Game Plan
Leverage of high performance intelligence
Quality of chief coach and other leadership in decision making
2012 v 2008 Medal Table
Nation Rank Gold Silver Bronze Total
2012 2008 2012 2008 2012 2008 2012 2008 2012 2008
USA 1 2 46 36 29 38 29 36 104 110
China 2 1 38 51 27 21 23 28 88 100
UK 3 4 29 19 17 13 19 15 65 47
Russia 4 3 24 23 26 21 32 29 82 73
S Korea 5 7 13 13 8 10 7 38 28 31
Germany 6 5 11 16 19 10 14 15 44 41
France 7 10 11 7 11 16 12 18 34 41
Italy 8 9 8 8 9 9 11 10 28 27
Hungary 9 21 8 3 4 5 5 2 17 10
Australia 10 6 7 14 16 15 12 17 35 46
Japan 11 8 7 9 14 6 17 10 38 25
Kazakhsta 12 29 7 2 1 4 5 7 13 13
2012 v 2008 Medal Table
Nation Rank Gold Silver Bronze Total 2012 2008 2012 2008 2012 2008 2012 2008 2012 2008
Netherland 13 12 6 7 6 5 8 4 20 16
Ukraine 14 11 6 7 5 5 9 15 20 27
New Zealand
15 25 6 3 2 2 5 4 13 9
Cuba 16 28 5 2 3 11 6 11 14 24
Iran 17 51 4 1 5 0 3 1 12 2
Jamaica 18 14 4 6 4 3 4 2 12 11
Czech Rep
19 24 4 3 3 3 3 0 10 6
N Korea 20 34 4 2 0 1 2 3 6 6
Spain 21 15 3 5 10 10 4 3 17 18
Brazil 22 23 3 3 5 4 9 8 17 15
S Africa 23 70 3 0 2 1 1 0 6 1
Comparison of points per top 20 nations: 2004, 2008 and 2012
Rank Nation 2004 2008 2012
1 USA 233.5 207 303
2 Russia 192 200 171
3 Kenya 67 136 112
4 Jamaica 78 120 107
5 Germany 45 43.5 95
6 Ethiopia 72 76 90
7 Great Britain 69.5 72 85
8 China 31 39 70
9 Ukraine 47.5 50 47
10 France 23.5 37 39
11 Trinidad & Tobago 2 18 35
12 Czech Republic 25 23 30
13 Australia 34 40 27
14 Cuba 52 61 25
15 Canada 9.5 23 22
16 Poland 47 43 21
17 Turkey 7 16 20
18 Bahamas 29 22 19
19 Belgium 6 9 19
20 South Africa 24 14 15
23 Italy 27 20 15
25 Netherlands 12 3 13
27 Spain 36.5 31.5 12
All Finalists v European Finalists - Men
0
5
10
15
20
25
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
AGE
NO
OF
FIN
AL
IST
S Finalists - All Men
Finalists - European Men
All Medalists v European Medalists - Men
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
AGE
NO
OF
ME
DA
LIS
TS Medalists - All Men
Medalists - European Men
All Finalists v European Finalists - Women
0
5
10
15
20
25
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
AGE
NO
OF
FIN
AL
IST
S
Finalists - All Women
Finalists - European Women
All Medalists v European Medalists - Women
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
AGE
NO
OF
ME
DA
LIS
TS
Medalists - All Women
Medalists - European Women
World Men Juniors –
Medalists 2000-2010 v Olympics 2012
127 European
medals in JWC
2000-2010
360 total medals 2000-2010
33 Finalists in Olympics from IAAF family
9 European Finalists in Olympics
World Men Juniors –
Medalists 2000-2010 v Olympics 2012
127 European
medals in JWC
2000-2010
360 total medals 2000-2010
14 Medalists in Olympics from IAAF family
1 European Medalist in Olympics
World Women Juniors
Medalists 2000-2010 v Olympics 2012
169 European
medals in JWC
2000-2010
354 total medals 2000-2010
30 Finalists in Olympics from IAAF family
11 European Finalists in Olympics
World Women Juniors
Medalists 2000-2010 v Olympics 2012
169 European
medals in JWC
2000-2010
354 total medals 2000-2010
18 Medalists in Olympics from IAAF family
7 European Medalists in Olympics
Athlete Development Pathway
Excite
to
participate
Participate
to
practise
Practise
to
prepare
Prepare
to
Perform
Perform
to
Compete
Compete
to
Learn
Learn
to
win
Value of World Youth (18 yrs) championships?
Value of Youth Olympics?
Value of “World Contender” (21/22 years) championships?
Medals or Season’s Best (or better) during London 2012
Delivering on the Day
Country Athlete Interventions
M W
Medals
M W
SB
M W
Total
M W
%
M W
Russia 37 55 2 16 8 6 10 22 27.0 40.0
UK 38 35 4 2 4 9 8 11 21.1 31.4
Germany 27 31 4 4 1 6 5 10 18.5 28.6
France 28 12 2 0 4 6 6 6 21.4 50.0
Poland 25 16 1 1 1 3 2 4 8.0 25.0
Ukraine 30 42 1 2 2 6 3 8 10.0 19.0
Italy 13 15 1 0 1 4 2 4 15.4 26.7
Finland 13 5 1 0 2 0 3 0 23.1 0.00
Spain 27 19 0 0 3 7 3 7 11.1 36.8
Sweden 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
USA 59 60 15 14 10 17 25 31 42.4 51.7
Jamaica 19 17 7 5 2 4 9 9 47.4 52.9
China 24 30 3 2 3 1 6 3 25.0 10.0
Medals or Season’s Best in the Athlete’s Final Performance in the Competition
e.g. Some athletes performed a SB in a preliminary round but performed worse in their final competition
appearance.
Delivering on the Day Extreme
Country Total
M W
SB
M W
Medals
M W
Athlete Interventions
M W
%
M W
Russia 9 22 7 6 2 16 37 55 24.3 40.0
UK 7 6 3 4 4 2 38 35 18.4 17.1
Germany 5 10 1 6 4 4 27 31 18.5 28.6
France 6 6 4 6 2 0 28 12 21.4 50.0
Poland 2 4 1 3 1 1 25 16 8.0 25.0
Ukraine 3 8 2 6 1 2 30 42 10.0 19.0
Italy 2 3 1 3 1 0 13 15 15.4 20.0
Finland 2 0 1 0 1 0 13 5 15.4 0.00
Spain 3 7 3 7 0 0 27 19 11.1 36.8
Sweden 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 0
USA 21 26 6 12 15 14 59 60 35.6 43.3
Jamaica 9 7 2 2 7 5 19 17 47.4 41.2
China 6 3 3 1 3 2 24 30 25.0 10.0
Soft edge of coaching = Performance Improvement
Hard edge of coaching = Delivering best “on the day”
Coach education programs may be failing re hard edge.
If it’s only about
taking part,
why do they count the medals?
LIFE EXPERIENCE
Science
(Taught)
Values
Art
(Learned)
Repeat Learn Do Be Become
Informal
Formal
A Climate of Constant Change
Performance
Standards Technological
Advance Performance Sciences’
Accelerating Growth & New Status
Personal Attitude
Shift Social/Cultural
Flux Redefining in Perception
of Achievement
Development in
Coaching/Training Practice
Rules
Change Relationship
Dynamics
Have we understood how these changes are changing people’s attitudes and behaviours?
Have we responded directly, constructively and effectively?
London was not a landing strip . . .
It is a launching pad
G OAL
R EALITY
O PTIONS
W ILL
L EARNING
GOALS
What is the target result by the agreed
date?
What performance will bring that result?
What is the performance structure?
What KPI & KPD scores give that performance?
REALITY
What is the current performance?
What is the current performance structure?
What are current KPI & KPD scores?
OPTIONS
What is your gap analysis?
What could you do to bridge the gap?
Who do you need to support the process?
What resources are there/do you need?
WILL
What is your plan of action to deliver the
win, working back from the result date?
LEARN
What controls/monitoring will you use to
learn faster?
What is your review/debrief process?
What will you do for your personal
continuous learning?
2015/
2016
2012/
2013
2013/
2014
2014/
2015
Plan Backwards
2016 Deliver
2015-2016 – Fine tune for selection & delivery
2014-2015 – Learn to win. Final drive for Olympic performance structure
2013-2014 – Compete to learn. Hard drive to elevate performance structure, tougher competition
2012-2013 – Apply lessons learned, regenerate, rebuild, establish performance launch platform
Use the Olympic cycle
for short and long term strategy
Athlete Development/Performance Pathway
20:20 Double Vision! 20:20 Double Vision!
Preparation for the Athlete/Team
CPD & Effectiveness Programs
Personal coaches (team coaches)
Chief coaches & national coaches
Performance directors/managers
Managers & administrators including press liaison etc
Sport decision makers
Coaching Points
Athlete tracking
Athlete preparation plans
Cross-sport Olympic Athlete Forum (+!)
Coach tracking (& support staff tracking)
Leader/coach/manager etc Performance Plan
Targeted development for high performance team
Nexus of Education: Health: Sport Ministries
Context – (the Pea Pod!)
The “Pea Pod” The Bigger Picture
Philosophy, principles, policy?
Develop people
Increase participation
Improve performance
Ensure provision
Energise promotion
Manage partnerships
Rio is not a landing strip . . .
It is a launching pad
Our nation:
My Responsibility
Dr Frank Dick OBE
twitter.com/frankdickcoach
