Upload
imdadbuet
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectrometry of Vanadium in Titania Supported Silica Catalysts
1/9
Talanta 47 (1998) 143151
Laser induced breakdown spectrometry of vanadium in titania
supported silica catalysts
P. Lucena a, L.M. Cabaln a, E. Pardo b, F. Martn b, L.J. Alemany b, J.J. Laserna a,*a Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Uniersity of M alaga, E-29071, Malaga, Spainb Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Sciences, Uniersity of Malaga, E-29071, Malaga,Spain
Received 17 September 1997; received in revised form 4 February 1998; accepted 10 February 1998
Abstract
The capability of laser induced breakdown spectrometry (LIBS) for vanadium determination in a x V2TiO2SiO2catalyst is presented. The microplasma was generated onto the sample surface using a pulsed Nd:YAG laser operating
in the second harmonic (532 nm). Laser produced plasmas were collected and detected using a charge-coupled device
(CCD). In order to minimize the complex spectral interferences of emission lines and matrix effects a wide spectral
range (210 660 nm) was studied. The focusing of the laser beam on the surface was optimized to improve the
signal-to-background ratio, and consequently the limit of detection. The analytical lines selected were used to evaluate
the calibration curve. The detection limit for V was estimated to be 38 g g1 in 2TiO2 SiO2. The method precision
expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD) was better than 6% in the concentration range 2001000 g g1.
1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: LIBS; Vanadium analysis; Catalysts; Quantitative determination
1. Introduction
TiO2-supported vanadium oxides have been ex-
tensively studied and used due to their high cata-
lytic activity and selectivity in many chemical
reactions [17]. For instance, V/TiO2is one of the
most effective catalysts in the selective catalytic
reduction (SCR) of NOx
by NH3 [7,8]. Industri-
ally, in these catalysts the anatase, a polymorph
form of TiO2, is used as support for vanadium
oxide. Titania is the support more widely used for
this purpose, although alumina, and to a lesser
extent silica are also used. In spite of its wide use,
titania suffers several drawbacks, including lim-
ited surface area, poor mechanical strength and a
low sintering resistance. On the other hand, the
interaction of vanadia with silica is weak and,
consequently it results in a higher tendency to
thermally induced aggregation with a poor disper-
sion of the active phase, while alumina-supported
vanadia catalysts are susceptible to sulfation. The
binary TiO2 SiO2 system, in principle, seems an
ideal candidate to overcome the above disadvan-
tages [9].* Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 5 2131881; fax: +34 5
2132000; e-mail: [email protected]
0039-9140/98/$19.00 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PIIS0039-9140(98)00063-0
8/12/2019 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectrometry of Vanadium in Titania Supported Silica Catalysts
2/9
P. Lucena et al./Talanta 47 (1998) 143151144
It is envisaged that ternary V Ti Si systems
display similar characteristics to those of binary
V Ti catalysts. In addition to the economic
benefits, the presence of silica grants much better
mechanical properties to the system, which may
allow its application in fluidized bed reactors or
extrusion into monolith reactors. The bulk, the
surface physico-chemical properties and the reac-tivity of VTiSi systems are strongly dependent
on the method used for their preparation and the
precursors used in the vanadia distribution. Vana-
dium loading determines the nature and distribu-
tion of vanadia species on the titania support.
Therefore the structure and morphology of the
TiO2 SiO2 substrate will determine to a large
extent the dispersion of vanadia. In contrast to
binary systems, ternary catalysts are still not fully
understood.
For VTiSi systems, it is very interesting to
evaluate the dispersion and possible diffusion of
vanadium into the support. Knowledge of thequantitative microstructure and composition are
of great importance in understanding the possible
correlations of distribution and composition with
catalytic properties. Consequently, the develop-
ment of analytical methods for these materials is
of great practical interest.
The capability of laser induced breakdown
spectrometry (LIBS) for materials characteriza-
tion has been widely demonstrated [10 14]. Re-
cent analytical applications of LIBS include the
determination of aluminum in zinc alloy [15], the
simultaneous determination of aluminum, copper,
iron, nickel, and zinc in alloys [16], the determina-tion of copper in steel [17], and the detection of
lead in concrete [18]. Surface analysis of photonic-
grade silicon has been demonstrated [19,20]. How-
ever, no applications of LIBS for vanadium
determination in catalysts have been previously
reported. For this purpose, other surface analysis
techniques (such as secondary ion mass spec-
trometry; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) can
be used [21]. In comparison with those techniques,
LIBS presents a number of advantages including
the need for little or no sample preparation, the
minute sample quantities needed, the possibility
of work without controlled atmospheres and the
rapid analysis time. In this paper, LIBS has been
evaluated for the quantitative determination of
vanadium in xV2TiO2 SiO2 catalysts.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Apparatus
The LIBS system has been described in previ-
ous works [22,23]. Briefly, it consisted of a pulsed
Nd:YAG laser operating in the second harmonic
(Continuum, model Surelite SLI-20, =532 nm,
pulse width 5 ns), which was used to generate the
microplasma. The laser energy at the sample was
4 mJ pulse1. The laser beam was focused at
normal incidence onto the sample surface using a
planoconvex glass lens with a focal length of 100
mm and f-number of 4. The plasma image was
collected by a planoconvex quartz lens with focal
length of 100 mm and dispersed by an imaging
spectrograph (Chromex, model 500 IS, fitted withthree indexable gratings of 300, 1200 and 2400
grooves mm1). Two of the three gratings (300
and 2400 grooves mm1) were employed in this
study. The reciprocal linear dispersion was 20 and
2.5 nm mm1, respectively. These values gave
spectral coverages of 120 nm for the 300 grooves
mm1 grating and 15 nm for the 2400 grooves
mm1 grating with the detector used. The en-
trance slit width was 10 m and the height was 10
mm.
The spectrally resolved light was detected with
a solid-state two-dimensional charge-coupled
device (CCD) system (Stanford Computer Optics,model 4 Quik 05). The CCD consists of 752(h)
582(v) elements. The photoactive area is 64.5
mm2. The spectral resolution of the system was
0.16 and 0.02 nm pixel1 using the 300 grooves
mm1 and the 2400 grooves mm1 gratings,
respectively. The CCD is equipped with an S 20 Q
photocatode (spectral response from 180 to 820
nm) and an intensifier system (microchannel plate,
MCP). Operation of the detector was controlled
by 4 Spec 1.20 software. Shutter and delay times
can be selected in 50 ns steps. A fast photodiode
was used as external trigger for exact synchroniza-
tion of the incident laser pulse and opening of the
camera shutter. The emission signal was corrected
8/12/2019 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectrometry of Vanadium in Titania Supported Silica Catalysts
3/9
P. Lucena et al./Talanta 47 (1998) 143151 145
by subtraction of the dark current of the detector,
which was separately measured for the same expo-
sure time. Calibration of the detector system was
conducted by using a mercury emission lamp and
several lines emitted from a laser induced titanium
plasma. Samples were placed on a manual XY
Z translation stage to be moved with respect to
the laser beam.
2.2. Samples
Catalysts were prepared using 2TiO2 SiO2 as a
carrier for the ternary systems xV2TiO2 SiO2.
Silica microspheres (Aerosil 200 from Degussa)
with size ca. 13 nm diameter and surface area of
200 m2 g1 were used as starting material. The
resulting xV2TiO2 SiO2 material was obtained
by co-deposition of titania and vanadia on the
silica surface by incipient wetness impregnation,
as described by Geuss et al. [24] and others [25
28]. The impregnation was made by adding amethanolic solution containing variable amounts
of titanium tetraisopropoxide and vanadium
acetil-acetonate to the support particles. The sus-
pension was ultrasonically dispersed to ensure a
good homogeneity. The superficial precipitation
on silica occurs in a few minutes at room temper-
ature. Powders were then washed and dried in air
at 373 K overnight, and afterwards they were
calcined at 773 K in air for 2 h. This procedure
allows deposition of oxo-hydrated titanium
vanadium, which yields dispersed TiO2, with
vanadium incorporated into the TiO2 crystal lat-
tice. Several samples with different vanadiumloads were prepared, and they are labelled as
xV2TiO2 SiO2, where x denotes the theoreti-
cal vanadium loading in g g1 and 2TiO2, two
theoretical monolayers incorporated onto the sil-
ica surface. A monolayer was considered as the
loading of titania for completed covering of silica
surface by a 0.38 nm thick [26] film of TiO2,
which corresponds to the longest axis of the rutile
unit cell. The titanium oxide incorporated on
silica remains as small crystals of anatase covering
the silica surface, as previously reported by
Galan-Fereres et al. [26].
A set of six sample pellets were grounded with
a mortar and pelletized at a pressure of 7.5 Ton
cm2 for 15 min. Approximately 0.15 g of mix-
ture was pressed leading to samples of 13 mm in
diameter and about 0.5 mm thick. Concentration
of the calibration standards was in the range
20010000 g g1 vanadium in the 2TiO2 SiO2support. In addition, for qualitative analysis other
series of three pellets was prepared: one pellet
with a 2TiO2 SiO2 support, the second one withvanadium in form of V2O5 and the third one with
a 1:1 (w/w) V2O5 TiO2 mixture. As precision and
accuracy of LIBS are highly dependent on sample
composition, homogeneity, and surface condition,
samples were carefully prepared according to the
described methodology.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Spectral analysis
In the analysis of solid samples by LIBS, theresulting plasma includes lines corresponding to
the sample elements and matrix constituents.
Thus, the goal in the quantitative determination
of an element by LIBS is to find a well-resolved
line for the element of interest, free of matrix
interferences. In the determination of V in xV
2TiO2 SiO2 samples, silica can be easily iden-
tified. A simple study of spectral range permits the
choice of the optimal region for observing vana-
dium without spectral interferences of Si and O
emission lines. The main problem in this kind of
sample is the presence of TiO2. The large number
of Ti lines along the UV-VIS region and theirhigh intensities can complicate the qualitative and
quantitative analysis. Five different spectral re-
gions were studied for the most important emis-
sion lines of Ti and V in the range 210660 nm.
The spectral window covering the range 404418
nm was chosen since it contains the most intense
vanadium peak (411.18 nm) free from interference
of neighbouring spectral lines. Fig. 1(ac) shows,
respectively, the LIBS spectra corresponding to
the 2TiO2 SiO2 matrix, to neat V2O5 and to a 1:1
(w/w) V2O5 TiO2 mixture. As shown in Fig. 1(c),
the main peaks for Ti and V are clearly distin-
guished. In these figures, only the most intense
emission lines were labelled [29]. Spectra were
8/12/2019 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectrometry of Vanadium in Titania Supported Silica Catalysts
4/9
P. Lucena et al./Talanta 47 (1998) 143151146
obtained using a single laser shot. Integration
time and delay time were 1 s and 300 ns,
respectively.
3.2. Effect of laser beam focusing on the
signal-to-background ratio
It is well-known that performance of LIBS for
quantitative analysis is related among other fac-
tors to the signal-to-background ratio (S/B) [30].
Since the background in LIBS depends on the
laser fluence used, a study on the effect of laser
focusing conditions on the S/B was performed.
Fig. 2 shows the variation of the average signal-
to-background values and their precision (in
terms of relative standard deviation, RSD) as a
function of the relative lens-target distance. The
values were calculated taking the background as
the mean background signal along 30 pixels in an
interference free region and close to the peak of
interest. In Fig. 2, the distance 0 indicates that
the sample was placed at the lens focal length.
Positive values of the relative focusing lens-target
distance refer to the beam focused at a distance
above the sample surface, while negative values
refer to the beam focal position placed inside the
material.From this figure, it is interesting to note that
the S/B precision appeared approximately con-
stant for relative lens-target distances from 2 to
+4 mm. However, the S/B reached a maximum
when the focal point was placed 12 mm above
the target surface. This value decreases drastically
when the laser beam was defocused a few millime-
ters onto the sample surface because the laser
fluence decreases. Scanning electron micrographs
of the craters produced by laser ablation in the
10000V2TiO2 SiO2 pellet surface at two differ-
Fig. 1. Single-shot LIB spectra corresponding to (a) 2TiO2SiO2support, (b) V2O5and (c) 1:1 (w/w) V2O5TiO2mixture. The delay
time was 300 ns. Acquisition time was of 1 s. MCP gain: 700 V.
8/12/2019 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectrometry of Vanadium in Titania Supported Silica Catalysts
5/9
P. Lucena et al./Talanta 47 (1998) 143151 147
Fig. 1. (Continued)
8/12/2019 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectrometry of Vanadium in Titania Supported Silica Catalysts
6/9
P. Lucena et al./Talanta 47 (1998) 143151148
Fig. 2. Signal-to-background ratio and its RSD (%) vs relative focusing lens-target distance. The V(I) line at 411.18 nm was used
for the measurements and the results were obtained using the pellet 10000V2TiO 2SiO2 support. Other conditions as in Fig. 1.
ent focusing distances are shown in Fig. 3. Micro-
graphs A and B were taken respectively at the
focal point and at a relative lens-target distance of
+2 mm, respectively. Two cumulative laser shots
were used. Micrographs confirm that the 0 posi-
tion presents the smallest irradiated surface. How-
ever, the efficiency in ablating the sample, and
consequently the S/B, can be increased when the
laser beam is focused above the focal point (+2
mm) because the laser energy is still enough to
allow ablation and the beam has a larger area ofcontact with the target surface. When further
defocused, the laser fluence becomes lower and it
is less efficient in ablating the sample. Conse-
quently, the optimum focal condition for both
maximum ablation and higher signal-to-back-
ground ratio is at a focusing lens-target distance
of+2 mm.
The irradiated areas and the laser fluences for
each focusing distance are summarized in Table 1.
The ablated areas were calculated assuming an
elliptical shape of the crater. As shown, a fluence
of 2.6 J cm2 with ablated area of 18.6102
mm2 were found for the optimum focusing condi-
tions. It should be to noted that although the
plasma is formed at atmospheric pressure and
above the focal point, the laser fluence used is
below the threshold fluence for breakdown of air,
and hence no lines corresponding to its several
components are observed.
3.3. Quantitatie analysis
It is well known that at early times following
plasma formation, the LIBS spectrum is domi-
nated by an intense radiation continuum andionic emissions. Emission lines are broadened by
the Stark effect. Temporal resolution was found
to improve both linearity and signal reproducibil-
ity of the catalyst analysis. In this case, to com-
pensate for the decreased signal at delayed
integration, ten laser shots were accumulated. The
optimal delay was estimated to be 1.3 s after the
laser shot. The use of internal standardization was
necessary to compensate for the pulse-to-pulse
variability and to minimize matrix effects. At
delayed integration, continuum emission was re-
duced, but the intensity of the lines of the internal
standard were also affected. For instance, the
ionic Ti (II) line intensity at 416.37 nm decreased
8/12/2019 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectrometry of Vanadium in Titania Supported Silica Catalysts
7/9
P. Lucena et al./Talanta 47 (1998) 143151 149
Fig. 3. Scanning electron micrographs of 10000V2TiO2SiO2 sample, showning the craters produced after two cummulative laser
shots. (A) Sample placed at the focusing lens focal position. (B) Sample placed 2 mm below the focusing lens focal position.
significantly, while the intensity of the neutral Ti
line at 407.85 nm increased. For this reason, the
atomic emission line of Ti was then chosen for
internal standardization. In addition, this line sa-
tisfies the regular requirements of an internal stan-
dard, i.e. proximity to the analyte line and
freedom from interference with the neighbouring
spectral lines.
Several lines of V were evaluated to construct
the calibration graph. The V(I) line at 411.18 nm
was finally selected as it provides the largest sensi-tivity with the smallest standard deviation, thus
8/12/2019 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectrometry of Vanadium in Titania Supported Silica Catalysts
8/9
P. Lucena et al./Talanta 47 (1998) 143151150
Table 1
Irradiated areas and laser fluences at different focusing lens-to-
sample distances
Focusing lens-target Fluence (J cm2)Crater area
(mm2, 102)distance (mm)
3 42.1 1.0
2.615.72
6.5 6.215.0 8.00
+1 15.6 2.7
+2 18.6 2.6
+3 30.8 1.3
The sample was 10 000 g g1 V in a TiO2SiO2 support.
presents good linearity, with correlation coeffi-
cient R2=0.9966. Deviation from linearity was
found at concentrations above 1000g g1, prob-
ably due to self-absorption [31,32].
The detection limit (CL) was calculated from
the formula:
CL=3s/S
where s is the standard deviation of the V to Tisignal ratio at low concentration andS represents
the method sensitivity calculated from the slope of
the linear section of the calibration curve. The
LOD from the time-resolved calibration graph
using thes value at 200 g g1 V was 38 g g1
V. This value is well below the V level expected in
xV2TiO2 SiO2 catalysts. The method precision
was better than 6% RSD in the concentrate range
2001000 g g1.
To check for the accuracy of the proposed
method, a recovery experiment was performed.
The results are summarized in Table 2. As shown,
recovery values are satisfactory, better than 90%
leading to the best limit of detection. Fig. 4 shows
the calibration graph for V in the 2TiO2 SiO2support. This figure presents the ratio between the
net line intensities of vanadium and internal stan-
dard as a function of V concentration. The net
peak signal was obtained by subtraction of the
background signal. As shown in Fig. 4, the curve
Fig. 4. Time-resolved calibration curve of V in a 2TiO2SiO2 support. The intensity of the 411.18 nm V(I) line was ratioed to that
of the 407.85 nm Ti(I) line. For construction of the calibration curve, mean values were calculated from six repeated measurements,each measurement representing an average of ten shots, from different target locations. The Inset shows the linear portion of
calibration curve where each point represents the mean value.
8/12/2019 Laser Induced Breakdown Spectrometry of Vanadium in Titania Supported Silica Catalysts
9/9