Laporan Singkat Capaian MDGs 2010-English-1

SUMMARY REPORT ON THE PROGRESS OF MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS OF MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS

INDONESIA 2010

DEPUTY FOR SOCIAL WELFAREOFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT

THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

Goals and Targets of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger

Target 1.A: Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people whose income is less than one dollar a day Target 1.B: Achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all, including women and young people Target 1 C: Halve between 1990 and 2015 the proportion of people who suffer from hunger Target 1.C: Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger

Goal 2: Achieve universal primary education Target 2.A: Ensure that, by 2015, children everywhere, boys and girls alike, will be able to complete a full course of primary schooling

Goal 3: Promote gender equality and empower women Target 3.A: Eliminate gender disparity in primary and secondary education, preferably by 2005, and in all levels of education no later than 2015

Goal 4: Reduce child mortality Target 4.A: Reduce by two-thirds, between 1990 and 2015, the under-five mortality rate

Goal 5: Improve maternal health Target 5.A: Reduce by three quarters, between 1990 and 2015, the maternal mortality ratio Target 5 B: Achieve by 2015 universal access to reproductive health Target 5.B: Achieve, by 2015, universal access to reproductive health

Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases Target 6.A: Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS Target 6.C: Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the incidence of malaria and other major diseases

Goal 7: Ensure environmental sustainability yTarget 7.A: Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country Target 7.B: Reduce biodiversity loss, achieving, by 2010, a significant reduction in the rate of loss Target 7.C: Halve, by 2015, the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation Target 7.D: By 2020, to have achieved a significant improvement in the lives of at least 100 million slum dwellers

Goal 8: Develop a global partnership for development Goal 8: Develop a global partnership for development Target 8.A: Develop further an open, rule-based, predictable, non-discriminatory trading and financial system Target 8.D: Deal comprehensively with the debt problems of developing countries through national and international measures in order to make debt sustainable in the long term Target 8.F: In cooperation with the private sector, make available the benefits of new technologies, especially information and communications

Status of MDGs Indicators in Indonesia, per 2010Target Indicators Value Baseline MDGs

Target 2015Latest Status Remark

Year Value Year Value

Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty And HungerGoal 1. Eradicate Extreme Poverty And HungerTarget 1A. Reduce the Proportion of Poor People

1 Halve, between 1990 and 2015 the proportion of people whose income is less $ 1 (PPP) a day

% 1990 20.6 10.30 2008 5.90 Achieved

2 Halve, between 1990 and 2015 the proportion of people whose income % 1996 50.50 25.25 2008 42.60 Requiring great efforts is less $ 2 (PPP) a day (standard is to high)

3 Reduce the proportion of people pursuant to 1990-2015 National Poverty Line

% 1990 15.1 7.55-12.1 2009 14.15 On track(need special attention)

4 Poverty gap index (P1) Index 1990 2.70 2009 2.50 -5 Poverty Severity Index (P2) Index 1990 2009 0 68 -5 Poverty Severity Index (P2) Index 1990 2009 0.686 Proportion of Consumption of the Poorest Section of the Population

(Quintile 1)% 1990 9.3 5.00 2009 8.75 On track

Target 1B. Achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all, including women and young people7 Trend Formal Sector Employment Million Person 1990 31.53 To Increase 2009 32.14 Requiring great efforts

Target 1.C: Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger8 Percentage of Children Under Five Suffering from Malnutrition % 1992 35.5 17.75 2007 18.4 On track

9 Percentage of Children Under Five Suffering from Severe Malnutrition % 1992 6.3 3.60 2007 5.40 On track (Severe Underweight) (need special attention)

10 Percentage of Children Under Five Suffering from Underourishment % 1992 31.2 14.15 2007 13.00 Achieved


Target 2015Latest Status RemarkYear Value Year Value

Goal 2. Achieve Universal Primary EducationGoal 2. Achieve Universal Primary EducationTarget 2.A: Ensure that, by 2015, children everywhere, boys and girls alike, will be able to complete a full course of primary schooling

11 Net Enrollment Rate in Primary School (NER) / SD/MI % 1993 91.23 100 2008 95.14 On track12 Gross Enrolment Rate in Junior High School (GER) / (SMP/MTs) % 1993 55.60 100 2008 96.20 On track13 Literacy Rate for the 15-24 Age Group % 1993 97.22 100 2009 99.47 On track

Goal 3. Promote Gender Equality And Empower WomenTarget 3.A: Eliminate gender disparity in primary and secondary education, preferably by 2005, and in all levels of education no later than 2015

14 Net Enrolment Ratio (NER) of Female Students / Male Students in Primary School (PS/MI)

% 1993 100.6 100 2009 99.73 On track

15 Net Enrolment Ratio (NER) of Female Students / Male Students in Junior % 1993 101 3 100 2009 102 On track15 Net Enrolment Ratio (NER) of Female Students / Male Students in Junior High School (JHS/MTs)

% 1993 101.3 100 2009 102 On track

16 Net Enrolment Ratio (NER) of Female Students / Male Students in Senior High School (SHS/MA/SMK)

% 1993 98 100 2009 96.13 On track

17 Net Enrolment Ratio (NER) of Female Students / Male Students in TertiaryEducation

% 1993 85.1 100 2009 103.14 Achieved

18 National Female to Male Literacy Rate (Gender Literacy Parity Index) for The 15-24 Year Age Group

% 1993 97.9 100 2009 99.85 On track

Goal 4. Reduce Child MortalityTarget 4.A: Reduce by two-thirds, between 1990 and 2015, the under-five mortality rate

19 Infant Mortality Rate per 1,000 live births (IMR) Person 1992 68 23 2007 34 On track20 Child Mortality Rate per 1,000 Live Births Person 1992 97 32 2007 44 On track


Target 2015Latest Status RemarkYear Value Year Value

Goal 5 Improve Maternal Health Goal 5. Improve Maternal Health Target 5.A: Reduce by three quarters, between 1990 and 2015, the maternal mortality ratio

21 Maternal Mortality Rate per 100,000 Live Births (MMR) Person 1990 425 102 2007 228 Off track22 National Percentage of Births Assisted by Healthcare Workers % To Increase 2009 77.37 Need special attention

Target 5.B: Achieve, by 2015, universal access to reproductive health23 Proportion of Married Women Between 15-49 years Using Birth Control % To Increase 2008 56.62 Need special attention

Goal 6. Combat HIV/AIDS, Malaria And Other Diseases Target 6.A: Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS

24 Number of New AIDS Case Reported Person 1990 5 To Decrease 2008 5726 Off track

23 Proportion of Married Women Between 15 49 years Using Birth Control Devices

% To Increase 2008 56.62 Need special attention

24 Number of New AIDS Case Reported Person 1990 5 To Decrease 2008 5726 Off track(need special attention)

25 Number of New HIV Cases Reported Person 1990 4 To Decrease 2008 906 Off track (need special attention)

Target 6.C: Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the incidence of malaria and other major diseases26 Number of New Case of Malaria per 1000 Population (Annual Parasite

Incidence - API) for Java and Bali % 0.17 To Decrease 2008 0.17 On track

27 Number of New Case of Malaria per 1000 (Annual Malaria Incidence �– AMI) for Outside of Java and Bali

% 24.1 To Decrease 2008 18.6 On track

28 Proportion of tuberculosis cases detected tuberculosis (Case DetectionRate)

% 70 2008 72.82 AchievedRate)

29 Proportion of tuberculosis cases cured under directlyobserved treatment short (DOTS) course

% 85 2008 91 Achieved

Status of MDGs Indicators in Indonesia, per 2010Target Indicators Value

Baseline MDGs Target 2015

Latest StatusRemark


Goal 7. Ensure Environmental SustainabilityyTarget 7.A: Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programmes and reverse the loss of environmental resources

30 Designation of Forest Areas % 58,56 To maintain 2008 71,15 Steadily increasing31 CO2 Emissions per Capita Ton 1990 0.63 To reduce 2005 1.33 Increasing32 Consumption of Ozone Depleting Substances Ton 1992 7815 To reduce 2006 3800 Achieved

Target 7C: halve by 2015 the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitationTarget 7C: halve, by 2015, the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation33 Proportion of the Population with Access to Safe Drinking Water % 1990 14.7 77.2 2009 68.7 On track34 Proportion of the Households with Access to Piped Drinking Water Service % 2009 14.6 Need special attention35 Proportion of the Households with Access to Protected Non-piped Drinking

Water Service % 2009 54.1 On track

36 Proportion of Households with Access to Adequate Sanitation Facilities % 1990 18.16 59.08 2009 51.02 On trackp qTarget 7D. By 2020, to have achieved a significant improvement in the lives of at least 100 million slum dwellers

37 Proportion of Households with Access to Permanent Housing % 87.69 To increase 2009 88.25 On track

Status of MDGs Indicators in Indonesia, per 2010Target Indicators Value

Baseline MDGs Target 2015

Latest StatusRemark


Goal 8. Develop A Global Partnership For Developmentp p pTarget 8A. Develop further an open, rule-based, predictable, nondiscriminatory trading and financial system

38 Level of Economic Openness (Proportion of Export + Import to GDP) % 1990 52.5 To increase 2009 45.45 Declining39 Loan to Deposit Ratio of Commercial Banking % 2000 33.41 To increase 2009 72.88 Increasing40 Loan to Deposit Ratio of Rural Banking % 2000 85.78 To increase 2009 100.54 Increasing

Target 8D. Deal comprehensively with the debt problems of developing countries through national and international measures in order to make debt sustainable in the long term41 Foreign Debt to GDP Ratio % 1990 61.7 To decrease 2009 13.8 Steadily declining42 Debt to Service Ratio (DSR) % 1990 38.8 To decrease 2009 18 Steadily declining43 Debt to Service Export % 1990 249.1 To decrease 2008 118.4 Steadily declining

Target 8F. In cooperation with the private sector, make available the benefits of new technologies, especially information and communicationsTarget 8F. In cooperation with the private sector, make available the benefits of new technologies, especially information and communications44 Proportion of Households Owning Fixed Line Telephone % 2005 14.32 To increase 2009 10.27 Declining45 Proportion of Households Owning Cellular Telephone % 2005 21.43 To increase 2009 61.67 Increasing46 Proportion of Households Owning Computer % 2006 4.36 To increase 2009 8.32 Increasing47 Proportion of Households Owning Access Internet % 2006 1.95 To increase 2009 11.51 Increasing

Goal 1: Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger Target 1A. Reduce the Proportion of Poor People

Figure 1. National Trends in the Proportion of Population Below $ 1 PPP per day and $ 2 PPP//day70

50.5

59.5 58.7

53.550.1 49.0 49.6

50

60

45.2 45.242.6

30

40

%

20.617.4 16.2 14.8 13 410

20

11.89.8

7.8 8.3

13.4 129.9 9.2

7.2 6.6 7.45 6.1 7.54 6.10 5.900

10

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Source: World Bank Various publications and years of issue

Targ

et Proportion of Population Below $ 1 PPP per dayProportion of Population Below $ 2 PPP per dayMDGs Target

Summary Report on The Progress of Millennium Development Goals Indonesia 2010

Source: World Bank, Various publications and years of issueNote: The MDGs Target 1A: Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people whose income is less than one dollar (PPP) a day

Goal 1: Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Figure 2. National Trend of Total and Percentage of people living in Poverty Based on National Poverty Line (BPS), 1976-2009.

6054.2

43.2

49.54850

35

3027.2 25.9

34.5

38.7 37.9 38.39 37.34 36.15 35.1

39.0537.17

34.9632.53

40.1

30

40

%

22.528.6

21.6

17.415 1

17.7

24.2 23.4

19.14 18.41 18.19 17.42 16.66 15.9717.75 16.58 15.42 14 15 7 55

20

15.1 13.711.3

15.42 14.15 7.55

0

10

6 0 4 7 0 3 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5

197

198

198

198

199

199

199

199

199

199

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

201

201

201

201

201

Targ

et 20

1

Population of Poor People (Million People)Percentage of people living below national poverty line (BPS) (%)MDGs Target


Source: BPS, Various publications and years of issue


35.737.5

35

40

Figure 3. Percentage of people living in Poverty Based on National Poverty Line (BPS) by Province, 2009

25.0

28.230

35

21.8

16.318.6

20.2

17.7 17.2 16.7

22.8 23.3

19.0 18.9

15.314 15

20

25

%

11.59.5 9.5 8.8

7.5 8.3

12.0

7.6

5 1

9.37.0

5 1

7.79.8

12.3

15.3

10.4

14.15

10

15

3.65.1 5.1

0

5

AD UT AR AU BI EL LU NG EL RI rta AR NG IY M EN ALI

TB TT AR NG EL M UT NG EL RA LO AR KU UT AR UANA

SUMU

SUMB

A

RIA

JAM

SUMS

E

BENG

KUL

LAMP

UN

BABE

KEPR

DKI J

akar

JABA

JATE

N D

JATI

BANT

E BA NT NT

KALB

A

KALT

EN

KALS

E

KALT

I

SUL U

SULT

EN

SULS

E

SULR

GORO

NTAL

SULB

A

MALU

K

MALU

PABA

PAPU

Percentage of People Living in Poverty (%) National Percentage of People Living in Poverty (%)


Percentage of People Living in Poverty (%) National Percentage of People Living in Poverty (%)Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2009.


Figure 4. National Trend of Poverty Gap Index (P1) and Poverty Severity Index (P2), 2002-2009

4

3.013.13

2.89 2.94

3.43

2.99

3.37

3

3.5

2.50

2

2.5

1.5

2

0.79 0.85 0.78 0.811

0.841.00

0.680.5

1

02002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Poverty Gap Index (P1) Poverty Severity Index (P2)


Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS)


12Figure 5. Poverty Gap Index (P1) by Province, 2009

9.89.1

8

10

4 55.2

4.6

5.66

4.5

1.9

1 4 1 4

3.1 3.0

3.9

2.0 2.03.0

3.52.9

1 3

4.1

1 6 1 5 1 6

4.1

2.1

3.4

2.5

1 4

2.50

2

4

1.4 1.3 1.4 1.20.6

1.30.7

1.61.0 0.7

1.5 1.6 1.4

0

2

AD UT AR AU MBI

EL LU NG EL PRI

rta AR NG DIY IM EN ALI

TB TT AR NG EL IM UT NG EL RA LO AR KU UT AR UANA

SUMU

SUMB

A

RIA

JAM

SUMS

E

BENG

KUL

LAMP

UN

BABE

KEP

DKI J

aka

JAB A

JATE

N D

JAT

BANT

E BA NT NT

KALB

A

KALT

EN

KALS

E

KALT

SULU

SULT

EN

SULS

E

SULR

GORO

NTAL

SULB

A

MALU

K

MALU

PABA

PAPU

Poverty Gap Index (P1) National Poverty Gap Index (P1)


Poverty Gap Index (P1) National Poverty Gap Index (P1)Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2009.


3.57

3 5

4.0Figure 6. Poverty Severity Index (P2) by Province, 2009

2.98

2 5

3.0

3.5

1.68 1.672.0

2.5

1.34

0.860.77

1.12

0.77 0.74

1.04

0.76

1.14

1.37

0.98

1.27

0.600.681.0

1.5

0.500.32 0.25

0.36 0.310.14

0.500.33

0.17

0.400.22 0.17

0.43 0.360.55

0.36

0.0

0.5

AD UT AR AU BI EL LU NG EL RI rta AR NG IY IM EN ALI


SUMU

SUMB

A

RIA

JAM

SUMS

E

BENG

KUL

LAMP

UN

BABE

KEP

DKI J

aka r

JABA

JATE

N D

JAT I

BANT

E BA NT NT

KALB

A

KALT

EN

KALS

E

KALT

I

SULU

SULT

EN

SULS

E

SULR

GORO

NTAL

SULB

A

MALU

K

MALU

PABA

PAPU

Poverty Severity Index (P2) National Poverty Severity Index (P2)


y y ( ) y y ( )Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2009.


100

Figure 7. Proportion of Consumption of the Poorest Section of the Population (Quintile 1) against National Consumption (%), 1990-2009

80

90

100

90.7 90.9 91.3 90.4 90.9 90.3 92 37 91.2560

70

90.7 90.9 91.3 90.4 90.9 90.3 92.37 91.25

30

40

50%

10

20

30

9.3 9.1 8.7 9.6 9.1 9.7 7.63 8.750

1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2004 2008 2009

Other Quintile Poorest Quintile Share of National Consumption (%)


Other Quintile Poorest Quintile Share of National Consumption (%)Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS).


11.0

Figure 8. Proportion of Consumption of the Poorest Section of the Population (Quintile 1) against Total Consumption (%) by Province, 2009

9.66

9.17

9.70

8.77

10.10

9.26 9.57

8.72

9.89

9.40 9.29 8.93

9.27 9.13

8.74

9.71

8.68 8 37

9.51

8 42

8.97 9.07

9.58 9.84

9.66 9.47

8.63 8.75 9.0

10.0

8.08 8.19

7.69

8.26 8.27 8.37 8.42 8.31

7.0

8.0

%

5 0

6.0

4.0

5.0

NAD

MUT

BAR

RIAU

AMBI

MSEL

KULU

UNG

ABEL

EPRI

karta

ABAR EN

G

DIY

ATIM

TEN

BALI

NTB

NTT

BAR

ENG

LSEL

LTIM

ULUT ENG

LSEL

ULRA

TALO BA

R

UKU

ALUT

ABAR

APUA

SUM

SUM R JA

SUM

BENG

K

LAMP

U

BA KE

DKI J

ak JA JATE JA

BAN B

KAL

KALT

E

KAL

KAL

SU

SULT

E

SUL

SU

GORO

NT SUL

MAL M A PA PA

Poorest Quintile Share of Consumption (%) Poorest Quintile Share of National Consumption (%)


Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2009.

Goal 1: Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger Target 1B. Achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all, including women and young

people

Figure 9. National Trend of Formal Sector Employment (Million People) , 2000-200940

36

38

31.53

29 37 29 67

30.93 31.2032.14

32

34

eopl

e

29.37

27.84

26.53

28.42 28.8829.67

28

30

Millio

n Pe

24

26

20

22

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Source: National Labor Force Survey (BPS), Various years.

Goal 1: Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger Target 1.C: Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger

Figure 10. Percentage of Children Under Five Suffering from Severe Malnutrition (Severe Underweight) and Undernourishment (Moderate Underweight), 1989-2007

37.535.5

40

31.629.5

26.424.6

26.127.3 27.5 28.2 2830

35

31.2 28.3 2019

18.317 1 19 8

19.3 19.2 19.6 19.218.4 17.7520

25

11 6

17.1 19.8

13.0014.1510

15

6.3 7.211.6 10.5

8.1 7.5 6.3 8 8.3 8.6 8.85.40 3.60

0

5

989

992

995

998

999

000

001

002

003

004

005

007

008

009

010

011

012

013

014

015

1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Targ

et 2

Percentage of Children Under Five from Undernourishment (%)Percentage of Children Under Five Suffering from Severe Malnutrition (%)Percentage of Children Under Five Suffering from Malnutrition (%)MDGs Target


Source: Indonesian Health and Demographic Survey (BPS, BKKBN, USAID, Ministry of Health), Various years.


40

Figure 11. Percentage of Children Under Five Suffering From Severe Malnutrition (Severe Underweight) and Undernourishment (Moderate Underweight) by Province, 2007

30

35

15.8

14.3 16.7

24.2

14 16.1

18.2 18.7

15 917.2 15.4

18.5

16 1 16 4

18.4

15

20

25

%

10.78 4 7 5 8 1 9.4 8 5 8 1 8 4 8.9 8 2 10 9.3

3

14.313.9

12.6 11.711.9 11.8 13.7

9.4 1011.3 12

8.5

12.6 12.2

8.2

14

13.1

11.512.5

15.9 16.1 16.414.6

5

10

15

8.45.9 7.5 6.3 6.5 4.8 5.7 4.6 3 2.9 3.7 4 2.4

4.8 4.4 3.2

8.1 8.5 8.1 8.46.2

4.3

8.95.1 6.8 8.2 6.7 6.8 6.6

0

NAD

SUMU

T

SUMB

AR

RIAU

JAMB

I

SUMS

EL

NGKU

LU

AMPU

NG

BABE

L

KEPR

I

KI Ja

karta

JABA

R

JATE

NG DIY

JATI

M

BANT

EN BALI

NTB

NTT

KALB

AR

KALT

ENG

KALS

EL

KALT

IM

SULU

T

SULT

ENG

SULS

EL

SULR

A

RONT

ALO

SULB

AR

MALU

KU

MALU

T

PABA

R

PAPU

A

S

BE LA DK K S

GOR

Percentage of Children Under Five Suffering From Undernourishment (%)Percentage of Children Under Five Suffering From Severe Malnutrition (%)National Percentage of Children Under Five Suffering from Malnutrition (%)


Source: Indonesian Health and Demographic Survey (BPS, BKKBN, USAID, Ministry of Health), Various years.

Goal 2: Achieve Universal Primary Education Target 2.A: Ensure that, by 2015, children everywhere, boys and girls alike, will be able to complete a full

course of primary schooling

120

Figure 12. National Trend for Primary School PS/MI (7-12 Years) Net Enrolment Rate (NER) and Junior High School JHS/MTs (13-15 Years) Gross Enrolment Rate (GER), 1992-2008 (%)

88.70 91.23 92.22 91.55 91.57 92.46 92.15 92.70 92.27 92.88 92.70 92.55 93.04 93.30 94.70 94.90 95.14

92.5096.20

100

61 1064.40 65.70

70.5074.20 73.10 76.00 77.50 78.30 79.90 81.09 82.24 82.30

88.7092.50

60

80

%

55.6061.10

40

0

20

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Primary School (PS/MI) Net Enrollment Rate (%) Junior High School (JHS/MTs) Gross Enrollment Ratio (%)NER MDGs Target GER MDGs Target


Source: Ministry of National Education.

Goal 2: Achieve Universal Primary Education

Figure 13. National Trend of Literacy Rate for the 15-24 Age Group, 1992-2009

100 100.00 100

100.5

98 67 98.76 98.84

99.45 99.47

99

99.5

100

97.72 97.6197.77

98.1598.35 98.42 98.44

98.27

98.67

98.5598.74

98

98.5

%

97.2297

97.5

95 5

96

96.5

95.5

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Targ

et 20

15

Literacy Rate for the 15-24 Age Group MDGs Target for Literacy Rate


Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS), Various years.

Goal 2: Achieve Universal Primary Education

99.47100

Figure 14. Literacy Rate for the 15-24 Age Group by Province, 2009

80

99.90

99.86

99.81

99.95

99.98

99.92

99.87

99.93

99.68

99.91

99.99

99.94

99.82

100.0

0

99.44

99.90

99.14

99.02

97.80

99.15

99.86

99.85

99.86

99.86

99.90

98.31

99.39

99.03

97.66 99.85

99.78

97.04

60

%

79.79

20

40

0

AD UT AR AU MBI

EL LU NG EL PRI

rta AR NG DIY IM EN ALI


SUMU

SUMB

A

RIA

JAM

SUMS

E

BENG

KUL

LAMP

UN

BABE

KEP

DKI J

akar

JABA

JATE

N D

JAT

BANT

E BA NT NT

KALB

A

KALT

EN

KALS

E

KALT

SUL U

SULT

EN

SULS

E

SULR

GORO

NTAL

SULB

A

MALU

K

MALU

PABA

PAPU

Litercy Rate for the 15-24 Age Group (%) National Literacy Rate for the 15-24 Age Group (%)


Litercy Rate for the 15 24 Age Group (%) National Literacy Rate for the 15 24 Age Group (%)Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2009.

Goal 3: Promote Gender Equality and Empower Women Target 3.A: Eliminate gender disparity in primary and secondary education, preferably by 2005, and in all

levels of education no later than 2015Figure 15. National Trend of Net Enrolment Ratio (NER) of Female Students against Male Students According to

Education Level (%), 1992-2009108.4 107.1 107.9

107 4110

100 699.86 99.84

101.3 100.08

103.36

100.38101.75

104.85102.97 103.31

101.95

102.00100.1

100 4

102.5

107.4103.1

100

105

100.6 99.7398.0

93.796.1

99.697.1

100.498.7 99.7 100.0 98.8 98.9

96.192.8

94.9

90

95

%

85.1

82.283.7

85.3

79.5

83.9

81.0

87.1

80

85

74.1

77.275

80

701992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Primary School Female/Male NER (7-12 years) Junior High School Female/Male NER (13-15 years)Senior High School Female/Male NER (16-18 years) Tertiary Education Female/Male NER (19-24 years)


Senior High School Female/Male NER (16 18 years) Tertiary Education Female/Male NER (19 24 years)


Goal 3: Promote Gender Equality and Empower Women

105

Figure 16. Net Enrolment Ratio (NER) of Female Students Against Male Students for Primary Education (PS/MI) by Province (%), 2009

102

103

104

99.73100

101

%

100.0

2

100.2

3

100.3

8

101.0

1

100.6

5

99.77 10

0.44

43

100.5

5

102.5

9

99.48 99.64

99.31

102.2

1

99.62 100.0

6

99.63 10

0.79

99.34

.73 99.39 99

.81

100.0

1

99.36 99

.77

99.38 10

0.14

100.3

5 101.8

2

68 3497

98

99

98.4 9

97.79

9

98. 9 9 9

98.

96.39

98.3

95

96

97

D T R U BI EL U G EL RI ta R G Y M N LI B TT R G EL M T G EL A O R U T R A

NA

SUMU

SUMB

A

RIA

JAMB

SUMS

E

BENG

KUL

LAMP

UNG

BABE

KEPR

DKI J

akar

t

JABA

JATE

NG DIY

JATI

M

BANT

E BAL

NT NT

KALB

A

KALT

ENG

KALS

E

KALT

IM

SULU

SULT

ENG

SULS

E

SULR

A

GORO

NTAL

O

SULB

A

MALU

K

MALU

PABA

PAPU

A

Primary School Female/Male NER (7-12 years) National Primary School Female/Male NER


Primary School Female/Male NER (7 12 years) National Primary School Female/Male NERSource: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2009.


120

Figure 17. Net Enrolment Ratio (NER) of Female Students Against Male Students for Junior High School Education (JHS/MTs) by Province (%), 2009

110

115

.20 4 117.5

9

102.00

100

105

%

99.61 10

1.89 10

6.99

6.46

105.3

3

108.9

0

105.7

2

96.91

108.9

2

99.09

5.59 10

2.09

105.6

5

114 .

99.72

98.56

63

102.9

4

111.4

4

101.3

9

104.6

5

103.9

6

104.1

5

104.8

6

108.5

1

99.09 10

3.80

1

105.0

9

104.3

2

67 97.7190

95

96 9 95 94.

93.6 9

89.33

80

85


NA

SUMU

SUMB

A

RIA

JAMB

SUMS

E

BENG

KUL

LAMP

UNG

BABE

KEPR

DKI J

akar

t

JABA

JATE

NG DIY

JATI

M

BANT

E BAL

NT NT

KALB

A

KALT

ENG

KALS

E

KALT

IM

SULU

SULT

ENG

SULS

E

SULR

A

GORO

NTAL

O

SULB

A

MALU

K

MALU

PABA

PAPU

A

Junior High School Female/Male NER (13-15 years) National Junior High School Female/Male NER


Junior High School Female/Male NER (13 15 years) National Junior High School Female/Male NER



140

150

Figure 18. Net Enrolment Ratio (NER) of Female Students Against Male Students for Senior High School Education (SHS/MA) by Province (%), 2009

120

130

140

144.3

6 96.13100

110

%

103.1

4

100.8

3 117.0

7

111.0

0

09.64

111.7

1

105.0

9

94.52

111.4

7

4 .39

98.30

94.57

7.94

91.96

9.47

85

118.6

5

100.9

0

98.54 101.8

7

109.1

5

109.7

3

104.7

0

97.51 101.4

0

106.6

2 124.6

2

107.2

3

94.47

8.8170

80

90

10

79.44 86 87 9 89

83.8

68.61

8 8

50

60

AD UT AR AU BI EL LU G EL RI ta AR G IY M EN LI TB TT AR G EL M UT G EL RA O AR KU UT AR UANA

SUMU

SUMB

A

RIA

JAMB

SUMS

E

BENG

KUL

LAMP

UN

BAB E

KEPR

DKI J

akar

t

JABA

JATE

N DI

JATI

BANT

E BA NT NT

KALB

A

KALT

EN

KALS

E

KALT

I

SULU

SULT

EN

SULS

E

SULR

GORO

NTAL

SULB

A

MALU

K

MALU

PABA

PAPU

Senior High School Female/Male NER (16-18 years) National Senior High School Female/Male NER (16-18 years)


Senior High School Female/Male NER (16 18 years) National Senior High School Female/Male NER (16 18 years)Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2009.


180

Figure 19. Net Enrolment Ratio (NER) of Female Students Against Male Students for Tertiary Education by Province (%), 2009

120

140

160

2 63.85

8.57

4

103.14

80

100

120

%

139.7

2

106.9

8 134.4

8

117.5

2

98.01 11

9.65

126.0

6

1 6

107.3

0

86.01

81.33 84.13

125.8

2

76.18 93

.16

95.37

89.11

115.1

8

102.2

7

91.35 10

7.41

158

118.7

6

127.8

0

109.3

7 143.0

4

125.2

0

106.1

4 135.5

7

108.9

3

118.0

5

103.8

2

88.78

40

60

80

7

0

20

AD UT AR AU BI EL LU G EL RI ta AR G IY M EN LI TB TT AR G EL M UT G EL RA O AR KU UT AR UANA

SUMU

SUMB

A

RIA

JAMB

SUMS

E

BENG

KUL

LAMP

UN

BAB E

KEPR

DKI J

akar

t

JABA

JATE

N DI

JATI

BANT

E BA N T NT

KALB

A

KALT

EN

KALS

E

KALT

I

SUL U

SULT

EN

SULS

E

SULR

GORO

NTAL

SULB

A

MALU

K

MALU

PABA

PAPU

Tertiary Education Female/Male NER (19-24 years) National Tertiary Education Female/Male NER (19-24 years)


Tertiary Education Female/Male NER (19 24 years) National Tertiary Education Female/Male NER (19 24 years)Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2009.


101

Figure 20. National Female to Male Literacy Rate (Gender Literacy Parity Index) for The 15-24 Year Age Group (%), 1992-2009

98 899.1 99.1 99.2

99.6 99.4 99.4 99.699.8 99.7

100.0 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.8 100100

97.9

98.498.8

98

99

%

97

96

951992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Female/Male Literacy Rate for the 15-24 Years Age Group MDGs Target



Goal 3: Promote Gender Equality and Empower Women Target 3.A: Eliminate gender disparity in primary and secondary education, preferably by 2005, and in all levels of education no later than 2015

105

Figure 21. Female to Male Literacy Rate (Gender Literacy Parity Index) for the 15-24 Year Age Group by Province (%), 2009

99.85100

0 5 83 .27

95

%

100.0

3

99.86

100.0

0

100.0

2

100.0

4

100.0

3

99.90

100.0

0

99.90

99.97

100.0

2

99.95

99.79

100.5

0

99.40

100.0

7

100.0

9

98.97 99.69

100.0

7

99.92

99.88

99.88

100.2

5

101.

99.07 10

2

99.52

99.33

100.0

0

100.0

4

35

98.12

85

90

89.3

80

85

D T R U BI L U G L RI ta R G Y M N LI B T R G L M T G L A O R U T R A

NAD

SUMU

T

SUMB

AR

RIAU

JAMB

SUMS

E

BENG

KULU

LAMP

UNG

BABE

KEPR

DKI J

akar

t

JABA

R

JATE

NG DIY

JATI

M

BANT

EN BAL

NTB

NTT

KALB

AR

KALT

ENG

KALS

E

KALT

IM

SULU

T

SULT

ENG

SULS

E

SULR

A

GORO

NTAL

O

SULB

AR

MALU

KU

MALU

T

PABA

R

PAPU

A

Female to Male Literacy Rate for the 15-24 Year Age Group National Female to Male Literacy Rate for the 15-24 Year Age Group


Female to Male Literacy Rate for the 15 24 Year Age Group National Female to Male Literacy Rate for the 15 24 Year Age GroupSource: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2009.

Goal 4: Reduce Child Mortality Target 4.A: Reduce by Two-thirds, Between 1990 and 2015, the Under-five Mortality Rate

Figure 22. National Trends of Infant and Child Mortality Rates, 1992-2007

97

120

81

97

80

100

68

57

58

46 4460

80

Pers

on

57

4635 34

32

20

40

23

0

20

2 4 7 3 5 7 0 1 2 3 4 5

199

199

199

200

200

200

201

201

201

201

201

Targ

et 20

1

Infant Mortality Rates (IMR) per 1000 Live Birth Child Mortality Rates (CMR) per 1000 Live BirthMDGs Target for IMR MDGs Target for CMR


MDGs Target for IMR MDGs Target for CMRSource: Indonesian Health and Demographic Survey (BPS, BKKBN, USAID, Ministry of Health), Various years.

Goal 4: Reduce Child Mortality

7274

80Figure 23. Infant Mortality Rate per 1,000 live births (IMR) by Province, 2007

57 5860

52

5960

70

46 47

3739

42

4643

39

43

39

35

46 46

35

41 41

52 51

41

3640

50

Pers

on

2528

26

19

35 34

30

26

35 3634

20

30

19

10

20

AD UT AR AU MBI

SEL

ULU NG BEL

PRI

arta AR NG DIY

TIM EN AL

I

NTB

NTT AR NG SEL

TIM

LUT

NG SEL RA ALO AR KU LUT AR UANA

SUM

SUMB

A

RIA

JAM

SUMS

BENG

KU

LAMP

UN

BAB

KEP

DKI J

aka

JABA

JATE

N D

JAT

BANT B A N N

KALB

A

KALT

EN

KALS

KALT

SUL

SULT

EN

SULS

SUL

GORO

NTA

SULB

A

MALU MA

L

PABA

PAP

Infant Mortality Rate per 1,000 live births (IMR) Infant Mortality Rate per 1,000 live births (IMR) National Average


Infant Mortality Rate per 1,000 live births (IMR) Infant Mortality Rate per 1,000 live births (IMR) National AverageSource: Indonesian Health and Demographic Survey (BPS, BKKBN, USAID, Ministry of Health), Various years. (BPS), 2007..

Goal 4: Reduce Child Mortality

9296

93100

110Figure 24. Child Mortality Rate per 1,000 Live Births by Province, 2007

92

8075

69 69

93

7480

90

45

6762

47 4752

65

55

46

58

4945

58 59

69

53

62

6964 62

4450

60

70

Pers

on

45 46

3632

22

45

3834

384344

30

40

50

22

10

20

NAD

MUT

BAR

IAU

MBI

SEL

ULU

UNG

BEL

PRI

arta

BAR

ENG

DIY

TIM

TEN

BALI

NTB

NTT

BAR

ENG

SEL

TIM

LUT

ENG

SEL

LRA

ALO

BAR

UKU

LUT

BAR

PUA

N

SUM

SUMB R JA

M

SUMS

BENG

KU

LAMP

U

BAB

KE

DKI J

aka

JAB

JATE JA

T

BANT B N N

KALB

KALT

E

KALS

KALT

SUL

SULT

E

SULS

SUL

GORO

NTA

SULB

MALU MA

L

PAB

PAP

Child Mortality Rate per 1,000 Live Births National Child Mortality Rate per 1,000 Live Births


Child Mortality Rate per 1,000 Live Births National Child Mortality Rate per 1,000 Live Births Source: Indonesian Health and Demographic Survey (BPS, BKKBN, USAID, Ministry of Health), Various years. (BPS), 2007.

Goal 5: Improve Maternal Health Target 5.A: Reduce by Three Quarters, Between 1990 and 2015, The Maternal Mortality Ratio

Figure 25. National Trends of Maternal Mortality Rate per 100,000 Live Births (MMR), 2007

425

500

390373

334307

400

307

262 255228

300

Pers

on

102

200

0

100

0

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Targ

et 20

15

Maternal Mortality Rate per 100,000 Live Births (MMR MDGs Target


Source: Indonesian Health and Demographic Survey (BPS, BKKBN, USAID, Ministry of Health), Various years. (BPS), 2007.

Goal 5: Improve Maternal Health

Figure 26. National Percentage of Births Assisted by Healthcare Workers, 1993-200990

67 971.5 70.5 72.4 72.5

75.2 77.470

80

50 254.0 52.0

60.263.5 64.3

66.7 67.9

50

60

%

40.043.8

46.350.2

30

40

%

10

20

0

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009


2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS), Various years


98 14

110

Figure 27. Percentage of Births Assisted by Healthcare Workers by Province, 2009

85.8688.68 88.91

82.7578.69

85.20

76 30

85.3487.63

98.14

84.34

96.94

86.34

96.24

76 01

85.3682.83

80

90

100

70.49

76.30

70.28 68.9571.31

59.14

63.66

76.01

62.51

69.55

63.1260.52

77.37

60

70

80

%

50.08 48.78 47.57

42.33

47.2549.17

40

50

20

30


NA

SUMU

SUMB

A

RIA

JAM B

SUMS

E

BENG

KUL

LAMP

UNG

BABE

KEPR

DKI J

akar

t

JABA

JATE

N G DI

JATI

M

BANT

E BAL

NT N T

KALB

A

KALT

ENG

KALS

E

KALT

IM

SULU

SULT

ENG

SULS

E

SULR

GORO

NTAL

O

SULB

A

MALU

K

MALU

PABA

PAPU

A

Percentage of Births Assisted by Healthcare Workers National Percentage of Births Assisted by Healthcare Workers


Percentage of Births Assisted by Healthcare Workers National Percentage of Births Assisted by Healthcare WorkersSource: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2009.

Goal 5: Improve Maternal Health Target 5.B: Achieve, By 2015, Universal Access to Reproductive Health

Figure 28. National Proportion of Married Women Between 15-49 years Using Birth Control Devices, 1993-2008

59

57.89 57.9157.4357

58

55.3 55.42 55.49 55.35

54 54

56.71 56.63

54

55

56

%

53.2

54.3 54.32 54.35

52.54

54.1654.54

52

53

54%

50

51

49

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009




67 62 68 40 70

80Figure 29. Proportion of Married Women Between 15-49 years Using Birth Control Devices by Province, 2008

52.41

62.16 62.92

67.62 64.58 64.30

53.07 52.68

60.51 59.19 57.42

59.54 58.00

65.06

53.07

60.73

68.40

64.25

55.29

65.19

55.91 59.54

56.6350

60

70

42.40 41.91

47.32

35.91

43.18 46.34 45.23

32.10

43.33

30

40

50

%

26.69 27.71

20

30

0

10

NAD

MUT

BAR

RIAU

AMBI

SEL

ULU

UNG

BEL

EPRI

karta

BAR

ENG

DIY

ATIM

TEN

BALI

NTB

NTT

BAR

ENG

SEL

LTIM LUT

ENG

SEL

LRA

ALO

BAR

UKU

LUT

BAR

PUA

N

SUM

SUMB R JA

SUMS

BENG

KU

LAMP

U

BAB

KE

DKI J

ak JAB

JATE JA

BANT B N N

KALB

KALT

E

KALS

KAL

SUL

SULT

E

SULS

SUL

GORO

NTA

SULB

MALU MA

L

PAB

PAP

Proportion of Married Women Between 15-49 years Using Birth Control DevicesNational Proportion of Married Women Between 15-49 years Using Birth Control Devices


National Proportion of Married Women Between 15-49 years Using Birth Control DevicesSource: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2008.

Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, Malaria and Other Diseases Target 6.A: Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS

Figure 30. Number of New AIDS and HIV Cases Reported in Indonesia, 1990-20087000

5726

5000

6000

4000

5000

son

2638

2873

2191

3000

Pers

316

1195

403732 648

986

9061000

2000

5 15 13 24 20 23 42 44 60 94 255 219345

316403

168649 875

6750

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009New AIDS Cases New HIV Cases


Source: Ministry of Health

Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, Malaria and Other Diseases Target 6.C: Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the incidence of malaria and other

major diseasesFigure 31. National Malaria Detection Rate, 1990-2008

31.0935

0 8

0.9

24.1 22.79

20 5122.11

19 3821.72 21.97

24.926.2

21.8 21.2

24.75 23.980.81

0 6225

30

0.6

0.7

0.8

20.51 19.38

16.0619.67

18.60.52

0.62

15

20

0.4

0.5

AMI

API

0.17

0.19 0 17

0.3

0.22

0 15 0 150.19

0 16

0.17

5

10

0 1

0.2

0.3

0.120.17

0.07 0.080.12

0.15 0.15 0.16

0

5

0

0.1

1990

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Note: API= Annual Parasite Incidence (Per 1000 population). AMI=Annual Malaria Incidence (per 1000 population)S Mi i t f H lth

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Prevalence Rate of Malaria Outside Java and Bali (AMI)Prevalence Rate of Malaria in Java and Bali (API)


Sourcer: Ministry of Health

Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, Malaria and Other Diseases

0.710.8

Figure 32. Annual Parasite Incidence (API) (per 1000 Population) by Selected Province, 2008

0.580.6

0.7

0 4

0.5

0.3

0.4

0.07

0.17

0.1

0.2

0

0.070.03 0.03

0

0

DKI Jakarta JABAR JATENG DIY JATIM BANTEN BALI


Sourcer: Ministry of Health, 2008.


167.47180

Figure 33. Annual Malaria Incidence (AMI) (per 1000 Population) by Selected Province, 2008

120

140

160

104.1

84.74

80

100

120

40.58 39.65

51.42

40

60

2.03

8.152.58

3.06

18.08

5.46

22.96

2.79

13.3221.85

3.2311.21

4.28.59

16.48 17.81

1.51

10.2613.94

11.98

0

20

AD UT AR AU BI EL LU G EL RI TB TT AR G EL M UT G EL RA O AR KU UT AR UANA

SUMU

SUMB

A

RIA

JAMB

SUMS

E

BENG

KUL

LAMP

UN

BABE

KEPR NT NT

KALB

A

KALT

EN

KALS

E

KALT

IM

SULU

SULT

EN

SULS

E

SULR

GORO

NTAL

SULB

A

MALU

K

MALU

PABA

PAPU


Sourcer: Ministry of Health, 2008


Figure 34. National Detection Rate (CDR) and Success Rate (SR) of Tuberculosis, 1993-2008

9187 86 86 87 89 91 91

8791.02

90

100

68

75.68

69.1272.82

78

68

81

70

80

90

37 6

545458

50

50

60

%

19 20 21

29

37.6

20

30

40

14

712

0

10

20

01993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Detection Rate (CDR) of Tuberculosis Success Rate (SR) of Tuberculosis


Source: Ministry of Health, Various publication.


85 589.6

90

100Figure 35. Detection Rate of Tuberculosis (CDR) by Province, 2008

67.8

85.5

68.7

78.6

63.7

72.8270

80

41.2

48.6 49.946

48.6

40.3

55.2

4851.4

59.6

46.943.7

41.437 6

53.157.6

48.9

40

57

40

50

60

%

26.629.5

34.2 35.3

2932.1

37.6

26.8

34.2

20

30

40

0

10

AD UT AR AU MBI

EL LU NG EL PRI

rta AR NG DIY

TIM EN AL

I

TB TT AR NG EL TIM UT NG EL RA LO AR KU UT AR UANA

SUMU

SUMB

A

RIA

JAM

SUMS

BENG

KUL

LAMP

UN

BABE

KEP

DKI J

aka

JABA

JATE

N D

JAT

BANT

E BA NT NT

KALB

A

KALT

EN

KALS

E

KALT

SULU

SULT

EN

SULS

E

SULR

GORO

NTAL

SULB

A

MALU

K

MALU

PABA

PAPU

Detection Rate of Tuberculosis (CDR) National Detection Rate of Tuberculosis (CDR)


Detection Rate of Tuberculosis (CDR) National Detection Rate of Tuberculosis (CDR)Sourcer: Ministry of Health. 2008


110

Figure 36. Success Rate (SR) of Tuberculosis by Province, 2008

90.63

95.41

89.02

93.82 94.09

97.5294.30

90.50

96.51

88.7491.87 90.59

88.61

95.73

86.7189.67 90.20

93.7891.62 90.69

97.0294.78

88.78

95.2998.53

87.47 88.1391.02

90

100

81.1582.97 82.21 81.70

75.42

70

80%

59.9460

70

50

NAD

SUMU

T

SUMB

AR

RIAU

JAMB

I

SUMS

EL

NGKU

LU

AMPU

NG

BABE

L

KEPR

I

KI Ja

karta

JABA

R

JATE

NG DIY

JATI

M

BANT

EN BALI

NTB

NTT

KALB

AR

KALT

ENG

KALS

EL

KALT

IM

SULU

T

SULT

ENG

SULS

EL

SULR

A

RONT

ALO

SULB

AR

MALU

KU

MALU

T

PABA

R

PAPU

A

S

BE L A DK K S

GOR

Success Rate (SR) of Tuberculosis National Success Rate (SR) of Tuberculosis

Note: Success Rate is cured under directly observed treatment short (DOTS) course


y ( )Source: Health Profile, Ministry of Health 2008

Goal 7: Ensure Environmental Sustainability Target 7.A: Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programmes

and reverse the loss of environmental resources

Figure 37. Trends in the Designation of Forest Areas (in Million of Hectares) and the Percentage of Designated Forest Areas against Total Land, 2002-2008

80160000

58.56 58.5264.05

67.58 67.81 67.9371.15

60

70

120000

140000

40

50

60

80000

100000

120000

Hect

ares

109,961 109,961120,350 126,983 127,430 127,650 133,695

30

40

60000

80000 %

Millio

n of

H

10

20

20000

40000

002002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Trends in the Designation of Forest Areas (Million of Hectares) Percentage of Designated of Forest Areas to Land Areas (%)


Source: Ministry of Forestry, Various years.

Goal 7: Ensure Environmental Sustainability

Figure 38. Total CO2 Emissions per Capita and Energy Consumption Per Capita, 1990-2007

2.62 2.59 2.60 2.56

1.60 3.00

1.98

2.41 2.44 2.32 2.37

2.56

1 18 1.20 1.20 1.29

1.33 1.20

1.40 2.50

1 28 1.38

1.47 1.55

1.66 1.74

1.81 1.75

0 84 0.91

0.96 0.95

1.07 1.15 1.18

0.80

1.00

1.50

2.00

Ton

BOE

1.22 1.28

0.63 0.68

0.71 0.73 0.80

0.84

0 40

0.60 1.00

B

0.20

0.40

0.50

--1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Energy Consumption Percapita (BOE) CO2 Emissions per Capita (Ton)


Source: Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Various years.

gy p p ( ) p p ( )


Figure 39. Total Consumption of Ozone Depleting Substances (in Metric Tons), 1990-2007

9275 94049000

1000012000

91509580 8585

6567

8005 7976

6329 7000

8000

9000

8000

10000

7815 77288162

66086276 6462

7998 7763

6544

5686

63295997

55575172

57875120

5000

6000

7000

6000

8000

ric To

nes

ric To

nes

52115836

3800

5120

4265

27363000

40004000

Metr

Metr

1569

00

1000

2000

0

2000

000

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Ozone Depleting Potential (Metric Ton) Ozone Depleting Substances Consumption (Metric Ton)


Source: Ministry of Environment, , Various years.

Goal 7: Ensure Environmental Sustainability Target 7.C: Halve, By 2015, The Proportion of People Without Sustainable Access to Safe Drinking Water

and Basic Sanitation

Figure 40. National Trend of Proportion of the Population with Access to Safe Drinking Water (%), 1992-200975.6

68 780

54.4

62.668.7

50

60

70

38.2

43.457.2

54.1

30

40

50

%

14 7 19.2 18.4 14 610

20

30

14.7 14.6

01992 2000 2006 2009

Proportion of the Population with Access to Protected Non-Pipe Drinking Water (%)

Note: Safe drinking water are commutative number people with access to piped drinking water plus protected non-piped drinking water services.Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) Various years

Proportion of the Population with Access to Protected Non Pipe Drinking Water (%)Proportion of the Population with Access to Piped Drinking Water (%)Proportion of the Population with Access to Safe Drinking Water (%)


Source: National Socio Economic Survey (BPS), Various years.


39.8140

45Figure 41. Proportion of the Households with Access to Piped Drinking Water Service (%), 2009

30.64

35.48

30

35

22.3420.56

15.64

19.37

22.74

16.0514 58

18.1815.95

18.19

15.28

21.40 21.35

18.53

16.07

18.9721.07

14.6020

25

%

9.87

13.14

4.03

12.15 11.789.57

14.58

7.01

14.00

6.04

11.67 11.96

60

5

10

15

2.15 1.80

0

5

NAD

SUMU

T

UMBA

R

RIAU

JAMB

I

UMSE

L

GKUL

U

MPUN

G

BABE

L

KEPR

I

Jaka

rta

JABA

R

ATEN

G

DIY

JATI

M

ANTE

N

BALI

NTB

NTT

KALB

AR

LTEN

G

KALS

EL

KALT

IM

SULU

T

LTEN

G

SULS

EL

SULR

A

NTAL

O

ULBA

R

ALUK

U

MALU

T

PABA

R

PAPU

A

S SU SU

BENG LAM

DKI J A BA K KA

K K

SU

S

GORO S M A M P P

Proportion of the Households with Access to Piped Drinking Water Service (%)National Proportion of the Households with Access to Piped Drinking Water Service (%)


Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2009


58 08 60.40 59.96 59.25 60

70Figure 42. Proportion of the Households with Access to Protected Non-piped Drinking Water Service (%), 2009

51.17

46.68

40.96

51.31 49.00

40 30 40 43

58.08 55.57

44.99 45.77

53.53 51.88

55.40

44.41 44.21 49.93

59.25

44.83

42.31

55.62

43.75

47.79

54.10

50

60

30.53 32.89

40.30 36.89 37.64

34.70

40.43

27.24

36.58 34.75

30

40

%

10

20

0

NAD

SUMU

TSU

MBAR

RIAU

JAMB

ISU

MSEL

NGKU

LUAM

PUNG

BABE

LKE

PRI

KI Ja

karta

JABA

RJA

TENG DI

YJA

TIM

BANT

EN BALI

NTB

NTT

KALB

ARAL

TENG

KALS

ELKA

LTIM

SULU

TUL

TENG

SULS

ELSU

LRA

ONTA

LOSU

LBAR

MALU

KUMA

LUT

PABA

RPA

PUA

S SBE

N LA DK

B KA S

GORO S M

Proportion of the Households with Access to Protected Non-piped Drinking Water (%)National Proportion of the Households with Access to Protected Non-piped Drinking Water (%)


Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2009


Figure 43. The Proportion of Households with Access to Adequate Sanitation Facilities Nationally, 1995-2009

69

80

69

60

70

40 13

51.02

40

50

%

23.7 24.9527.82 28.47 29.37 30.95 30.96

33.4430

37.8240.13

20

30

18.1621.39

23.7

0

10

01995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Proportion of Households with Access to Adequate Sanitation (%)MDGs Target


Sumber: Survey Sosial Ekonomi Nasional BPS, Berbagai Terbitan.MDGs Target


Figure 44. The Proportion of Households with Access to Adequate Sanitation Facilities by Province, 2008

80.46

75 22 75 8680

90

52 84

60.85

53 85

75.22

58.61

75.86

58.40

63.78

57.1960

70

80

42.05

52.02

39.31

52.84

41.00 41.75

34.7838.54

45.68

51.7653.85

50.96

39.82 39.30 41.11 41.8445.74

43.82 44.88

39.2443.17

32.05

51.02

40

50

%

15.33

25.4221.48

10

20

30

0

10

NAD

UMUT

MBAR

RIAU

AMBI

MSEL

KULU

PUNG

ABEL

KEPR

I

akar

ta

ABAR

TENG DI

Y

JATI

M

NTEN BALI

NTB

NTT

LBAR

TENG

ALSE

L

ALTI

M

ULUT

TENG

LSEL

ULRA

TALO

LBAR

LUKU

ALUT

ABAR

APUA

SU SUM J

SUM

BENG

K

LAMP BA K

DKI J

a JA JAT J

BAN

KAL

KALT KA KA SU

SULT SU S U

GORO

NT SUL

MAL MA PA PA

Proportion of Households with Access to Adequate Sanitation Facilities (%)National Proportion of Households with Access to Adequate Sanitation Facilities (%)


Note: Adequate sanitation facilities which must meet the criteria of being family owner with a ventilated pit latrine and septic tank.Source: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2009

Goal 7: Ensure Environmental Sustainability Target 7.D: By 2020, to have achieved a significant improvement in the lives of at least 100 million slum

dwellers

Figure 45. Proportion of Households with Access to Permanent Housing (%), 1992-2009

12.30 14.90 12.70 16.50 15.80 15.00 15.70 16.90 16.20 11.75 90

100

16.50 16.90 16.20

70

80

90

87.7 85.1 87.3 83.5 84.2 85 84.3 83 1 83.8 88.2540

50

60

%

83.5 84.2 84.3 83.1 83.8

20

30

40

0

10

1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Proportion of Household Unaccessable to Permanent Housing Proportion of Households with Access to Permanent Housing (%)Note: Access to permanent housing occur with owning status or leasing of houseSource: National Socio-Economic Survey (BPS) 2009


Goal 8: Develop A Global Partnership For Development Target 8.A: Develop further an open, rule-based, predictable, nondiscriminatory trading and financial

systemFigure 46. Level of Economic Openness, Loan to Deposit Ratio of Commercial and Rural Credit Banks (%), 2009

100.54 100

y

85.7880.87

70 74.580.73 82

87.37

80.0376.00 80

100

71.4468.22 53.67

59.51 62.92

58 3958 09 61.67

61.5666.32

74.5872.88

70

60

%

56.70 56.94 54.85 58.39

45.4533.41

33 0138.24

43.52

58.09

40

33.01

20

02000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Level of Economics Openness (%) Commercial Bank Loan to Deposit Ratio (%) BPR Loan to Deposit Ratio (%)


Source: Indonesian Banking Statistics (Bank of Indonesia).Level of Economics Openness (%) Commercial Bank Loan to Deposit Ratio (%) BPR Loan to Deposit Ratio (%)

Goal 8: Develop A Global Partnership For Development

Figure 47. Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) of Commercial Banks by Province, 2009300

247.51

185.42200

250

119.66108 45

128.67115.14

185.42

150%

65.03 76.5689.05

78.29 84.08

34 85

108.45

35 59

71.31 73.51

90.71

51.64

66.3280.30

60.46

102.41

73.0760.34

73.81 75.67

57.13

105.4495.59

32 86

58.4262.29

44.96 38.86

72.88

50

100

34.85 35.59 32.86 38.86

0

50

NAD

MUT

BAR

RIAU MB

I

SEL

ULU

UNG

BEL

EPRI

karta

BAR

ENG

DIY

ATIM

TEN

BALI

NTB

NTT

BAR

ENG

SEL

TIM

LUT

ENG

SEL

LRA

ALO

BAR

UKU

LUT

BAR

PUA

N

SUM

SUMB R JA

SUMS

BENG

KU

LAMP

U

BAB

KE

DKI J

ak JAB

JATE JA

BANT B N N

KALB

KALT

E

KALS

KAL

SUL

SULT

E

SULS

SUL

GORO

NTA

SULB

MALU MA

L

PAB

PAP

LDR of Commercial Banks National LDR of Commercial Banks


Source: Regional Economic and Financial Statistic, Bank of Indonesia, 2009.


Figure 47. Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) of Rural Credit Banks by Province, 2009300

245.7

193.4200

250

111.6109 5

129.9115.5

137.9

115.3100 1

141.8

167.1180.0

118.9109 0

143.4

121.7

100 54

150%

58.1

109.597.2

57.2

103.8 101.5 100.1 99.6

79.5

101.594.5

85.6

109.0

55.0

91.068.6

45.359.6

99.6100.54

50

100

0

NAD

MUT

BAR

RIAU MB

I

SEL

ULU

UNG

BEL

EPRI

karta

BAR

ENG

DIY

ATIM

TEN

BALI

NTB

NTT

BAR

ENG

SEL

LTIM LUT

ENG

SEL

LRA

ALO

BAR

UKU

LUT

PUA

N

SUM

SUMB R JA

SUMS

BENG

KU

LAMP

U

BAB

KE

DKI J

ak JAB

JATE JA

BANT B N N

KALB

KALT

E

KALS

KAL

SUL

SULT

E

SULS

SUL

GORO

NTA

SULB

MALU MA

L

PAP

LDR of Rural Credit Banks National LDR of Rural Credit Banks


Source: Regional Economic and Financial Statistic, Bank of Indonesia, 2009.

Goal 8: Develop A Global Partnership For Development Target 8.D: Deal comprehensively with the debt problems of developing countries through national and international

measures in order to make debt sustainable in the long term

Figure 49. Foreign Debt to GDP Ratio, Debt to Service Ratio and Debt to Export Ratio, 1990-2009

308 9

350

249.1216 7

240.9 254.6

308.9 304.3

236.3250

300

222.4

216.7218.9 237.4 221.2 228.1 229.8

221.6

191.3200

%

100.8

126.7

95.6107.5

94.3

155.8

127.7

119.7

118 4100

150

61.7 57.5 58.2 51.6 55.5 54.8 49.3 61.9 54.9 56.2 4834.8 31.2 28.9

13.838 8 38 9 36 8 38 3 35 6 43 1 44 752.6

75.5

47 40 1 36 7

118.4

50

100

38.8 38.9 36.8 38.3 35.6 36.2 43.1 44.7 40.1 36.7 29.3 30.1 17.3 24.8 19.4 18.1 1801990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Debt to GDP DSR Debt to Export


Source: Indonesia Economic and Financial Statistic and Foreign Debt Statistic of Indonesia, Bank of Indonesia .Debt to GDP DSR Debt to Export

Goal 8: Develop A Global Partnership For Development Target 8.F: In cooperation with the private sector, make available the benefits of new

technologies, especially information and communicationsg yFigure 50. Proportion of Households Owning Fixed Line Telephone, Cellular Phone, Computer and with

Access to Internet, 2005 - 200970

61.67

50

60

37.59

49.99

40

50

%

12 6921.43

24.620

30

14.32

11.2 12.699.39

10.27 4.36 4.4 7.17

8.32 4 2

7.06

11.51

0

10

1.95 4.202005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Proportion of Households Owning Telephones Proportion of Households Owning Cellular TelephonesProportion of Households Owning Computer Proportion of Households Owning Access to Internet


Proportion of Households Owning Computer Proportion of Households Owning Access to Internet



Figure 51. Proportion of Households Owning Fixed Line Telephone by Province, 2009

32.635

25

30

13 014.4

15.415

20

%

4.5

9.610.4

8.7

5.6

8.46.7 6.3 6.9

10.1

12.1

6.9

13.0

10.712.1

4 1 3 9

6.17.5

8.3

10.2

4 3

11.3

5.0

7.2

4 0

6.7

4.9

7.6

4.9

10.27

5

10

4.5 4.1 3.9 4.3 4.0

0

5

NAD

MUT

BAR

RIAU

AMBI

MSEL

KULU

UNG

ABEL

EPRI

karta

BAR

ENG

DIY

ATIM

TEN

BALI

NTB

NTT

BAR

ENG

LSEL

LTIM

ULUT ENG

LSEL

ULRA

TALO BA

R

UKU

ALUT BA

R

PUA

SUM

SUM R JA

SUM

BENG

K

LAMP

U

BA KE

DKI J

ak JA JAT E JA

BAN B

KAL

KALT

E

KAL

KAL

SU

SULT

E

SUL

SU

GORO

NT SUL

MAL MA PA PA

Households Owning Fixed Line Telephone National Households Owning Fixed Line Telephone




Figure 52. Proportion of Households Owning Computer by Province, 2009

25

20.319.020

10.4 10.5 10.9

9 3

12.0 11.6

14.2

10

15

%

6.17.2

8.4

6.37.5

4.3

9.1 9.3

6.27.6

4.04.6 5.0

6.3 6.58.0

4.7 5.3 5.4

7.9

4.8 5.2 5.7 5.8

7.98.32

5

10

0

NAD

MUT

BAR

RIAU MB

I

SEL

ULU

UNG

BEL

EPRI

karta

BAR

ENG

DIY

ATIM

TEN

BALI

NTB

NTT

BAR

ENG

SEL

TIM

LUT

ENG

SEL

LRA

ALO

BAR

UKU

LUT

BAR

PUA

N

SUM

SUMB R JA

SUMS

BENG

KU

LAMP

U

BAB

KE

DKI J

ak JAB

JATE JA

BANT B N N

KALB

KALT

E

KALS

KAL

SUL

SULT

E

SULS

SUL

GORO

NTA

SULB

MALU MA

L

PAB

PAP

Households Owning Computer National Households Owning Computer




Figure 53. Proportion of Households Owing Cellular Phone by Province, 2009

88.52 90

100

60 09

66.51 65.69

79.49

65.72 58 91

65.61

74.29

84.69

60 72 57 35

70.54

58 40 64.98

74.15

60 81

71.40

83.38

60 54 65.54

57 72 61.67 70

80

90

60.09 58.91 59.58 60.72 57.35 58.40

46.56

37.14

54.43

60.81 60.54

50.14

57.72

54.30 54.43

41.82 42.18 46.63

61.67

40

50

60

%

37.14

31.19

20

30

40

0

10

NAD

UMUT

MBAR

RIAU

AMBI

MSEL

KULU

PUNG

ABEL

EPRI

akar

ta

ABAR

TENG DI

Y

ATIM

NTEN BA

LI

NTB

NTT

LBAR

TENG

LSEL

ALTI

M

ULUT

TENG

LSEL

ULRA

TALO

LBAR

LUKU

ALUT

ABAR

APUA

SU SUM R JA

SUM

BENG

K

LAMP BA K

DKI J

a JA JAT JA

BAN

KAL

KALT KA

L

KA SU

SULT SU

L

SU

GORO

NT SUL

MAL MA IR

JA PA

Households Owning Cellular Phone National Households Owning Cellular Phone




Figure 54. Proportion of Households with Access to Internet by Province, 2009

34 32

40

34.32

27.92 30

35

18.57 20

25

%

8.28

13.87 12.31

7.08 9.18

10.45

5.47

10.17 12.56 12.29 9.64 11.35

12.53 12.38

6.82 4 64

6.93 6.05

10.26 11.62

5.82

9.80

6.55

9.91

4 13

7.82 6.29

8.24 6.40

11.51

10

15

4.64 4.13

0

5

MUT

BAR

RIAU MB

I

SEL

ULU

UNG

BEL

EPRI arta

BAR

ENG

DIY

ATIM

TEN

BALI

NTB

NTT

BAR

ENG

SEL

LTIM LUT

ENG

SEL

LRA

ALO

BAR

UKU

LUT

BAR

PUA

SUM

SUMB R JA

SUM S

BENG

KU

LAMP

U

BAB

KE

DKI J

ak JAB

JATE JA

BANT B N N

KALB

KALT

E

KALS

KAL

SUL

SULT

E

SULS

SUL

GORO

NTA

SULB

MALU MA

L

PAB

PAP

Households with Access to Internet National Households with Access to Internet



Documents

Laporan Singkat Capaian MDGs 2010-English-1