Upload
vesna-kojasevic
View
250
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/19/2019 Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin» - The Pushkin Review
1/12
You are here:You are here: HomeHome Vol. 08-09 Articles / СтатьиVol. 08-09 Articles / Статьи Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin»Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin»
Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin»Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin»
Luc Beaudoin
Tat´iana’s dream in Evgenii Onegin is an enigma. Occupying a central place in Pushkin’s novel in verse, it shares the role of novelistic
artifact with the protagonists’ letters and its folk song. Dreams, in particular, hold sway as indicators of special insights, as they have
for millenia, and literary dreams in particular make tempting targets for interpretation. [1] In Slavistics, Formalist and structuralist
analyses of the dream include V. M. Markovich’s “Son Tat´iany v poeticheskoi strukture ‘Evgeniia Onegina,’” and both Iurii Lotman’s
VisitorsVisitors
We have 27 guests and no members
online
International Pushkin SocietyInternational Pushkin Society MembershipMembership DonationsDonations
Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin» - The Pushkin Review / ... http://pushkiniana.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=109:beaudoin-article0...
1 of 12 24-Nov-15 12:30 PM
8/19/2019 Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin» - The Pushkin Review
2/12
8/19/2019 Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin» - The Pushkin Review
3/12
8/19/2019 Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin» - The Pushkin Review
4/12
8/19/2019 Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin» - The Pushkin Review
5/12
8/19/2019 Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin» - The Pushkin Review
6/12
8/19/2019 Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin» - The Pushkin Review
7/12
8/19/2019 Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin» - The Pushkin Review
8/12
8/19/2019 Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin» - The Pushkin Review
9/12
8/19/2019 Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin» - The Pushkin Review
10/12
8/19/2019 Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin» - The Pushkin Review
11/12
Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin» - The Pushkin Review / ... http://pushkiniana.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=109:beaudoin-article0...
8/19/2019 Language, Gender and the Dream in «Evgenii Onegin» - The Pushkin Review
12/12
Prev
[21] Gregg, “Tat´jana’s Two Dreams,” 500. This male sexuality can also be based on simple revulsion: the grotesque animals can be
seen as representing the suitors every girl’s parents would have paraded through the house, with the girl on display like in a zoo.
[22] Gachev also specifically equates “Onegin” with on, (he). See Georgii Gachev, Russkii eros: “Roman,” Mysli s zhizn´iu (Moscow:
Interprint, 1994), 15.
[23] A common symbol of the vagina, which in turn implicitly refers to the phallus and the beginning of her signification. See Cirlot,
Dictionary of Symbols, 85, 149.
[24] It should be noted that Pushkin was aware of the tendency to use the neuter form with brides-to-be in Russian folk songs. See
Rancour-Laferriere, “Puškin’s Still Unravished Bride,” 222.
[25]Sigmund Freud, Gesammelte Werke, vol. 15, Neue Folge der Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse (London: Imago
Publishing, 1940), 86.
[26] For an insightful discussion of Lacan’s reworking of Freud’s statement, see Jane Gallop, Reading Lacan, 95–96.
[27] Gregg, “Tat´jana’s Two Dreams,” 499.
[28] The motivation of Lenskii’s murder likewise can be interpreted in a Freudian fashion: Tat´iana justifies Onegin’s lack of interest in
her by deciding that he must be homosexual, and therefore has him stab Lenskij with a knife, thereby completing homosexual phallic
penetration. See Rancour-Laferriere, “Puškin’s Still Unravished Bride,” 244.
[29] Emerson has a fascinating take on this entire section of the novel: Onegin is in fact dreaming. Tat´iana’s reaction, then, would bewholly in Onegin’s dream. If this is in fact a dream, the analysis of Tat´iana’s actions would not be different. Just as Tat´iana’s dream,
by virtue of the intrusion by the metatextual narrator, is a vehicle with which to understand both her and Onegin, so his dream would
do the same. See Caryl Emerson, “Tatiana,” 6–20.
[30] V. G. Belinskii, Vzgliad na russkuiu literaturu (Moscow: Sovremennik, 1988), 475.
© 2014. All work published here remains the intellectual property of its author. All rights reserved.
Header photo by Michael Julius (2004).
12 of 12 24-Nov-15 12:30 PM