Lang Div HO Strengths & Weakness 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Lang Div HO Strengths & Weakness 2011

    1/2

    Measures of linguistic diversity

    Strengths Weaknesses

    Numbersoflanguages

    This index is especially useful when looking

    at the geography of languages and their

    geographical distribution and density.

    You can calculate density based on total

    population and total area (e.g., PNG 1/5,000;

    world 1/850,000; parts of PNG 1/30 sq km).

    If you have the number of speakers for each

    language, can determine the distributions of

    large and small languages. If you also have

    information about specific location of

    languages, can identify regions of high

    language density and low language density.

    Numbers of languages gives no idea of

    different types of languages (i.e., the range

    of structures) or the historical relationshipamong the languages (i.e., their genetic or

    family relationships, if any)its only

    number of different languages.

    [Definition for different languages:mutually unintelligible, that is, speakers of

    language A cannot understand speakers of

    language B, and speakers of language B

    cannot understand speakers of language A.]

    Typesoflanguages

    This index shows the range of structural

    possibilities of languages. It reveals thediversity of ways of seeing and classifying

    the worlddiversity of world views.

    Having a catalogue of Types suggests

    possible relationships between language

    and adaptation to social, cultural, or

    environmental circumstances.

    Catalogues of Types reveals what solutionsthe human mind has invented that are

    popular (common across languages) and

    solutions that are rare. Such information

    may suggest constraints on the psychology

    (the mind/brain) of language.

    Typological similarity among languages

    does not guarantee genetic relationship:similar types of languages do not necessarily

    belong to the same language family. There

    may be no historical connection at all

    between similar types of languages; indeed,

    usually there is not. Also, a catalogue of

    language Types does not reveal how

    languages change from one type to another

    over time (i.e., their historical background,

    changes over time). It shows languages as

    they are structurally today.

    But! Having a catalogue of Types can suggest

    genetic relationships among a group of

    languages occupying the same region!

    Examples: many Turkic languages are SOV;

    many Thai languages are tonal.

    Familiesoflanguages

    This index is especially useful when you

    want to determine the historical

    relationships among a group of languages;

    when you want to determine how languages

    change over time; how, over time, a mother

    language (e.g., Latin) split into daughter

    languages (e.g., French, Spanish, etc.).

    This index shows genetic relationships, thatis which languages are related historically.

    So this information suggests possible human

    migration routes in historical time. We can

    also trace how languages change (e.g., how

    Old English became Modern English)

    We can also determine historical dates, and

    trace back Proto languages. Example: Proto-

    Indo-Europeana language reconstructed

    using information from all the daughter

    languages of the Indo-European family:

    German, Russian, Hindi, Persian, Urdu, etc.

    The general weakness of this diversity type

    is that languages do not only descend from

    parent languages (vertical transmission of

    language vocabulary, structures, etc.), but

    also borrow from other languages

    (horizontal transmission). In other words,

    the family tree model does not apply to alllanguage groups. Examples: the family tree

    model does not work well among Australianand Amazonian languagesso much

    borrowing (vocabulary, structures) over

    time has made genetic relationships very

    difficult to uncover.

    [However, the family tree model works very

    well with some groups: e.g., Indo-European,

    Austronesian, Niger-Congo, Afro-Asiatic, etc.

    These are true language families.]

  • 8/3/2019 Lang Div HO Strengths & Weakness 2011

    2/2

    Language ecologiesto see interrelationships among languages; to seeprocesses behind language maintenance, spread, decline, extinction. To

    understand how languages grow, what factors underlie, so that we can see what

    Assess the health of a lang ecologyBy understanding the processes underlying a linguistic ecology, we can make

    intelligent adjustments aiming for desired outcomes.how high presting interacts with low prestige?

    how people distribute their com functions across languages

    what functions people ascribe to various languages

    how communication across function is achieved

    Parallels with Biodiversity measures

    species diversity

    genetic diversity variation in DNA within populationspopulation diversity

    habitat diversity

    ecosystem diversity

    food production based on

    domestication of wild plants and animal species

    arose independently at least 9 times

    9 homelands of agriculture and herding

    from 8,500 BC to 2,500 BC

    triggered enormous advatages