Land for Peace: Fair Trade?

7/31/2019 Land for Peace: Fair Trade?

1/8

Land For Peace:Fair Trade?

Camp StoneChavrutafest

Moshevet HaMedinahSecond Session

2012

A !ame for Heres" and #ffensive Poitics Shoud !e $irected To A%iva &eisin'er


2/8

(ntroductor" )ote: This cha*ura is deain' +ith the ceasin' of territor" to Paestinian contro in theinterest of peace, A these sources are +or%in' under the assumption that such a trade +oud indeed"ied a astin'- true peace- an eventuait" that has to this point remained firm" in the ream of theor",&e are not deain' +ith the possi*iit" that terrorism +oud continue despite territoria concession, &eare deain' +ith the assumption that terrorism +oud cease- and the issue at hand is +hether such a

peace is more vaua*e than and in .ret/ israe,

&hats &ron' &ith ivin' 3p Land?

4av Avraham Shapira- Former Ash%ena/i Chief 4a**i of (srae- Psa% Haacha- 2005

6Accordin' to Torah a+- it is compete" for*idden 7issur midoraita8 to 'ive and in (srae to a non9e+- due to the prohi*ition of lo techannem 76$o not 'ive them a foothod in the Land-;Devarim7:28 and due to the nuification of the commandment to sette the Land of (srae that is incum*entupon ever" individua of (srae, This prohi*ition appies to ever" e+- sodier or civiian ai%e, Anorder to ta%e part in the evacuation of e+s from their homes in order to 'ive over the and to non9e+s is an order that is a'ainst the rei'ion of our ho" Torah and for*idden to fufi, An"one +hovioates this prohi*ition +i not *e eNB ?>J>>N>\U>NB>YNBbV>Nb :BNBJ [BJ -VYQQQVJ>>YZN ,

From +here do +e derive these rues? 4a**i ose *ar Chanina said: For the verse states: Lo


3/8

techanem" g+hich ma" *e rendered: do not ao+ them to sette 7chanaya8 on the soi,

1, &hat +oud this app" to?

2, &ho +oud this app" to?

4am*am Hichos Avoda `ara 10:

[b>OJBNO>X>QV>JZNU\BUJY>J>bUZV>UU>>,UJ>XBUOU>Q>O>>BNZUBNUZVUVUJ

NUY\BJNUZ>U]NBBJBbZJ>OU>JZZOQU]UUj]O>YNBOBJUO>]NBUJ>XB>XJZO,VBU

JU>JZZOQU]>N[NWOUQ,>BU>JNWOUQBJB[JU>OWUJBBJO[JU>>B>JBJB

NWb]bJ

A the a*ove matters app" on" in an era +hen (srae is in e


4/8

, $oes this a'ree or disa'ree +ith the 4am*am?

5, &hat other issues mi'ht *e impacted *" this de*ate

4av Avraham it/cha% Haohen oo%- Shut Mishpat ohen- no, k

JB>QZbJ,JOVUB]OJZ>U\JYbVU]ZBNUU[U]U\JJJ,>BbUO>U\JZ"b"Y,W>OO

B">>>bUUOJNUjV>JBZO>bV>BZZ"[>ZJQ"Y .>ZJU>Y'ZN>UBN\NQU>JUbWV>BbZZ"[,

U>ONUXbBN:BJUO>]NBXUB>jY>QUB>J>bUZQQBV>JB,B"N>ZBb>XBUZ"[

!ut- in m" opinion- in an" pace +here +e find someone upon +hom to re" in a e


5/8

its *oundaries, (f *ecause of poitica *unders *" enties or 7od for*id8 *" e+s +e +i *e

compeed 7to eave the and8- +e are a o*i'ated to *e %ied and not to trans'ress #n udea and

Samaria- and on the oan Hei'hts99it +i not happen +ithout +ar

1, &hat does 4av T/vi ehuda oo% vaue more hi'h"- .ret/ israe or e+ish ives?

2, $oes 4av T/vi ehuda have haa%hic ustification for his vie+?

k, Ho+ does he concieve of the mit/vah of "ishuv haeret/?

, &hat mi'ht *e pro*ematic a*out this vie+?

4a**i osef !adad- Minchas Chinuch- 25

]U"Z>JbQU]V>Yb>X\"U]U[NUQbQU>]VUYJJVZZUb>UNUQbBJU\Q>>b'JZ\

NBUN"NbUVJUZV>WN>OV>bb]QZYJB">[YNUQbN[WVUYJJVZqBBUb\.

B">UYb'\VU[U]UWUNJUQUBqBQ\>O]U"Z

This matter reuires stud"- for a mitzvot are set aside +here there is dan'er- *ut nevertheess the Torah

commands gus to fi'ht a'ainst them 7the Seven )ations8- and +e %no+ that the Torah does not han' its

a+s on a mirace- as is eNb'B(UBUONUQBNB

NOB>QZOV>QUBJjNXUQUBVJU]U[JU>JUW>N]UUNBOUBUUN>NUBJBUJU>O

NZNJXOUWUqUYUV>UWU.'BJOUY>>VU.>BNUU[OU]UNBQ>'>ZV>JWN)VO(JZ

ONNOBNb>">>JBJJBBN>QJBUQYQ.NBUbUZ)Zj(YUJOU>">VQBObZNNBJUJZUONUQB

NBNOB>QQVJNOBUBJUBQUJZJNB[UQUNQUQB>X>">V>JBBJUVQBUJBJUVQZO

UJU,BNUQ>OU]BJbUZ>YjU.U[UB>V>YO>NUQUB)jU\X"Y"U(QYJU].UUNBNW

jU\)b(NBNbU>QYJZOU>OJ>NbJUYQYJbUbYUUNJ>NbJQUON.UOJU>NX\

)>jXUO'[>b>(QON>UQO>UQU[ON>QOOQ.JBUOQOQNBQU>U]QB[B>U]QYJZO'V>ZUUj]OVbBJO) '\"X>jXUO('VNYV>NYQ.>BNb.UBOU>Uj]WUNJQUUBVVYJUZ

VBUU]NV>JOJV>JOVZV[ZUV>BQV>ZUb>JBNBBJY>QUBVb>BJUb>VQJU[QUUBNUb

QUNUb.UVBUYNQUUBVU>XUJUVJ,VNB)b"N>jXUO('>OWNWXJUUJ,QUVJ"NB

UjV]NBU[>>NXB,U>Uj]UYBBUJNBOUJUQU>b>OUJUU>jO.U>NYBUQ>NQBV>Z

V>N[VBU]NNYBU>jOU[ZJQBNBOUJUVJQBNBNZOUBQBNBNUOBVQJU[UQUUV>B

>BON.U>Uj]OOU>Q>O>U.VNBUQYJZOU>OJ>Q>U]U[B>OU


6/8

&e +ere commanded to ta%e possession of the and that od- *essed and e


7/8

+oud do in the case of vioatin' Shabbat or eatin' non%osher food, #n the other hand- it is

unreasona*e to assume that in the case of fufiin' a mizvah that is e


8/8

decaration of +ar *" the nei'h*orin' Ara* gstates-,,,and if territories are reinuished the dan'er of

+ar +i *e removed- and that there are reaistic chances of astin' peace- then it appears- accordin' to

a the opinions- that it is permissi*e to reinuish territories of the Land of (srae,,,gaccordin' to the

principe ofikuach nefesh;

4av Chaim $avid Haevi- Torah She!aa Peh- 21

This is +hat +e said a*ove this is the po+er of Haa%ha- that it did not intervene in the detais of thea+s 'overnin' the state- and a it teaches are fundamenta principes, (n m" hum*e opinion- it seems

as e

Documents

Land for Peace: Fair Trade?