LaMuth Middle School - Riverside School District - State Facilities Report

8/14/2019 LaMuth Middle School - Riverside School District - State Facilities Report

1/46

Building Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School

Program Type Expedited Local Partnership Program (ELPP)

Setting Small City

Assessment Name Copy of LaMuth Middle School - Final

Assessment Date 2008-03-17

Cost Set: 2007

Building Name LaMuth Middle School

Building IRN 61895

Building Address 6700 Auburn Rd

Building City Painesville

Building Zipcode 44077

Building Phone (440) 354-4394

Acreage 48

Current Grades 6-7

Teaching Stations 38

Number of Floors 2

Student Capacity 633

Current Enrollment 732

Enrollment Date 2007-08-23

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms 33

Historical Register NO

Buildings Principal Mr. Eric Kujala

Building Type Middle

Next Page

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16Building Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School Page 1


2/46

Building Pictures - Riverside Local Local SD(47894) - LaMuth Middle School(61895)

North elevation photo: East elevation photo:

South elevation photo: West elevation photo:

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

89,837 Total Existing Square Footage

1969,1994 Building Dates

6-7 Grades

732 Current Enrollment

38 Teaching Stations

48 Site Acreage

LaMuth Middle School is a two (2) story structure totaling 89,837 s.f. The original facility of 35,174 s.f. was constructed in 1969. A large building addition totaling 54,663 s.f. wasconstructed in 1994. The complex contains one (1) gymnasium of 9,322 s.f., one (1) student dining of 4,859 s.f., one (1) kitchen of 1,842 s.f. and one (1) media center of 2,945 sLaMuth Middle School currently provides space for grades 6-7. The complex provides partial accessibility but does not fully conform to the provisions of the Americans withDisabilities Act Guidelines. Typical classrooms throughout the complex are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio. The schoolfacility is located on a 48 acre site in a residential area. School buses load/unload along the main entry drive which shares access with vehicular traffic. The existing structure is

outfitted with a motion sensor security system and a fire alarm system. A limited portion of the complex is equipped with an air conditioning system.

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16Building Pictures - Riverside Local Local SD(47894) - LaMuth Middle School(61895) Page 2


3/46

Building Construction Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

Name Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet

Original Building 1969 no 2 35,174

Building Addition 1994 yes 2 54,663

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16Building Construction Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895) Page 3


4/46

Building Component Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

AdditionAuditorium

FixedSeating

CorridorsAgriculturalEducation

Lab

PrimaryGymnasium

MediaCenter

VocationalSpace

StudentDining

Kitchen NatatoriumIndoorTracks

AdultEducation

BoardOffices

OutsideAgencies

AuxiliaryGymnasiu

Original Building(1969)

5395 4859 1842

Building Addition(1994)

8275 9322 2945

Master Planning Considerations

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16Building Component Information - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895) Page 4


5/46

Existing CT Programs for AssessmentNext Page

Previous Page

Program Type Program Name Related Space Square Feet

No Records Found

Legend:

Not in current design manual

In current design manual but missing from assessment

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16: Page 5


6/46

Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

Building Summary - LaMuth Middle School (61895)

District: Riverside Local Local SD

Name: LaMuth Middle School

Address: 6700 Auburn Rd

Painesville,OH 44077

Bldg. IRN: 61895

County: Lake Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)

Contact: Mr. Eric Kujala

Phone: (440) 354-4394

Date Prepared: 2008-03-17 By: Tony Schorr

Date Revised: 2008-08-26 By: Jeff Tuckerman

Current Grades 6-7 Acreage: 48

Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 38

Current Enrollment 732 Classrooms: 33

Projected Enrollment N/A

Addition Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet



Total 89,837

*HA = Handicapped Access

*Rating =1 Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair

=3 Needs Replacement

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction

FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2007 Rating

DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $2,605,273.00 -

B. Roofing 3 $399,777.00 -C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems 3 $553,990.50 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $100,400.00 -

F. Windows 3 $83,520.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 1 $0.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 2 $78,610.00 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -

J. General Finishes 3 $1,214,111.80 -

K. Interior Lighting 3 $449,185.00 -

L. Security Systems 3 $224,592.50 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $89,837.00 -

N. Fire Alarm 3 $134,755.50 -

O. Handicapped Access 3 $258,723.70 -

P. Site Condition 3 $563,535.50 -

Q. Sewage System 3 $164,700.00 -

R. Water Supply 1 $0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors 3 $32,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material 3 $189,000.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $341,970.25 -

V. Loose Furnishings 3 $179,674.00 -

W. Technology 3 $671,082.39 -

- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost

- $2,028,175.18 -

Total $10,362,913.32

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating CategoCover Sheet

1.0The School Site 200 186 93% Excelle

2.0Structural and Mechanical Features 400 286 72% Satisfacto

3.0Plant Maintainability 200 150 75% Satisfacto

4.0Building Safety and Security 400 292 73% Satisfacto

5.0Educational Adequacy 400 290 73% Satisfacto

6.0Environment for Education 400 304 76% Satisfacto

Commentary

Total 2000 1508 75% Satisfacto

C=Under Contract

Renovation Cost Factor 104.16

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $10,794,010

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary irequested from a Master Plan.

Previous Page

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16Main Assessment Menu - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895) Page 6


7/46


Original Building (1969) Summary





Bldg. IRN: 61895



Phone: (440) 354-4394










Total 89,837


*Rat ing =1 Sat isfactory

=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C





F. Windows 3 $73,920.00 -




J. General Finishes 3 $779,745.00 -




N. Fire Alarm 3 $52,761.00 -







U. Life Safety 3 $154,315.50 -


W. Technology 3 $262,749.78 -


- $1,061,759.14 -

Total $5,425,033.32









Commentary


C=Under Contract






8/46


Building Addition (1994) Summary





Bldg. IRN: 61895



Phone: (440) 354-4394










Total 89,837


*Rat ing =1 Sat isfactory

=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C



D. Electrical Systems 3 $0.00 -


F. Windows 3 $9,600.00 -




J. General Finishes 3 $434,366.80 -




N. Fire Alarm 3 $81,994.50 -



Q. Sewage System 3 $0.00 -



T. Hazardous Material 3 $0.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $187,654.75 -


W. Technology 3 $408,332.61 -


- $966,416.04 -

Total $4,937,880.00









Commentary


C=Under Contract






9/46

Facility Assessment

A. Heating System

Description: The existing system for the entire complex is a gas fired hot water system. The boilers were installed in 1983 and 2004. A limited portion of thecomplex is equipped with air conditioning. Typical classrooms are equipped with a 2 pipe ventilator system that will not permit simultaneousoperation of the boiler and chiller units. District officials noted the facilitys conditioning requirements have been difficult to manage duringmoderate temperature cycles.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide for complete replacement of the entire heating, ventilation, and cooling system throughout the entire complex due to condition and lack of

proper ventilation and air conditioning. Convert to a fully ducted system to conform to OSDM standards and current ventilation requirements.

Item Cost Unit WholeBuilding

Original Building(1969)35,174 ft

Building Addition(1994)54,663 ft

Sum Comments

HVAC SystemReplacement:

$22.00sq.ft. Required Required $1,976,414.00(includes demo of existing system and reconfiguration of piping layout andnew controls, air conditioning)

Convert To DuctedSystem Replacement

$7.00sq.ft. Required Required $628,859.00(includes cost for vert. & horz. chases, cut openings, soffits, etc. Must beused in addition to HVAC System Replacement if the existing HVAC systeis non-ducted)

Sum: $2,605,273.00$1,020,046.00 $1,585,227.00

Back to Assessment Summary

Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:Facility Assessment Page 9
http://-/?-http://-/?-


10/46

Facility Assessment

B. Roofing

Description: The existing roof asseembly for the complex is a modified bituminous roof system installed at various dates from 1978-2007. The majority of theexisting system installations exceed 15 years of age.


Recommendations: Provide for complete replacement of the existing roof systems due to condition and extent of dated system installations. Provide an OSDMcompliant membrane system at all areas.

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)35,174 ft

Building Addition (1994)54,663 ft

Sum Comments

Membrane (all types):$7.00sq.ft. (Qty) 17,593 Required 39,518 Required $399,777.00(unless under 10,000 sq.ft.)

Sum: $399,777.00 $123,151.00 $276,626.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


11/46

Facility Assessment

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

Description: A limited portion of the complex is equipped with an air conditioning system typically provided by roof top chiller units. The conditioned areas ofthe complex include the media center, technology labs, band and choral classroom areas, and administrative spaces. Window cooling units areprovided in a few areas.

Rating: 1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: Provide an air conditioning system throughout the entire complex to confrom to OSDM standards. Provisions identified in Plate A.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)35,174 ft


SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-


12/46


13/46

Facility Assessment

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

Description: The school facility contains 8 group restrooms (4 girls, 4 boys), 2 locker room toilets and 13 single occupancy restrooms. Fixtures are acombination of newer and older equipment. A portion of water closets/toilets are floor mounted. The majority of the restrooms at the 1969 buidingare not accessible and do not conform to the provisions of the ADA guidelines. The majority of the toilet rooms at the 1994 addition provideaccessible accommodations except for original portions of the facility that were incorporated into the new addition area. A portion of the urinalsare equipped with a continual flush system. District officials noted domestic supply piping was copper.


Recommendations: Provide for replacement of select wall and floor mounted fixtures due to age, condition, and OSDM requirements.



Sum Comments

Toilet: $3,800.00unit 10 Required 1 Required $41,800.00(new)

Urinal: $3,800.00unit 7 Required $26,600.00(new)

Sink: $2,500.00unit 8 Required 1 Required $22,500.00(new)

Other: Shower Valve/Faucet $500.00each 19 Required $9,500.00Shower Valve/Faucet

Sum: $100,400.00 $84,600.00 $15,800.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


14/46

Facility Assessment

F. Windows

Description: The majority of the existing window and storefront installations at the 1969 building are not equipped with thermally efficient units. Typical windowinstallations contain single pane glazing and are deteriorated. The 1994 media center addition is equipped with thermally efficient windowassemblies with insulated glazing. The window installations are operable and cannot be equipped with integral blinds.


Recommendations: Provide for complete replacement of all window assemblies at the 1969 addition to conform to OSDM standards and include integral blinds. Thewindow installations at the media center addition are satisfactory.



Sum Comments

Insulated Glass/Panels: $55.00sq.ft. (Qty) 1,344 Required $73,920.00(includes blinds)

Curtain Wall/Storefront System:$60.00sq.ft. (Qty) 160 Required $9,600.00(remove and replace)

Sum: $83,520.00 $73,920.00 $9,600.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


15/46

Facility Assessment

G. Structure: Foundation

Description: The existing complex contains a masonry/concrete foundation system. There were no significant areas of deterioration, cracking, or settlement.


Recommendations: No work is required at this time.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)

35,174 ft

Building Addition (1994)

54,663 ft

SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


16/46

Facility Assessment

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

Description: The existing structure is constructed with masonry bearing wall asemblies with brick and concrete masonry exteriors. There are a few minorareas of deterioration. The complex is equipped with control joints. District officials noted the facility underwent masonry renovations in 2004.

Rating: 2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: Provide masonry cleaning, sealing, and exteiror caulking as a preventative measure for routine maintenance.

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)35,174 ft Building Addition (1994)54,663 ft Sum Comments

Exterior Masonry Cleaning:$1.50sq.ft. (Qty) 7,968 Required 22,636 Required $45,906.00(wall surface)

Exterior Masonry Sealing: $1.00sq.ft. (Qty) 7,968 Required 22,636 Required $30,604.00(wall surface)

Exterior Caulking: $2.50ln.ft. 216 Required 624 Required $2,100.00(removing and replacing)

Sum: $78,610.00 $20,460.00 $58,150.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


17/46

Facility Assessment

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

Description: The floor construction for the entire complex is slab on grade construction and a steel joist system. The roof system for the structure is a steeljoist system. There was no significante evidence of deterioration.



Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)35,174 ft Building Addition (1994)54,663 ft SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


18/46

Facility Assessment

J. General Finishes

Description: The current finishes at the 1969 building are dated. The quantity of casework is limited. Portions of the existing locker installations are dated.District officials did not provide the specific date of construction but noted the majority of the equipment is original to the date of construction. Themajority of the finishes at the 1994 addition are satisfactory. A portion of the toilet partitions are deteriorated. Asbestos tile is suspected at thegymnasium, the flooring is deteriorated.


Recommendations: Provide for replacement of all finishes, casework, and lockers due to age, condition, and extent of renovation work at the 1969 structure. Replace

dated kitchen equipment. Replace/repair finishes disturbed by proposed renovation work at the 1994 building addition. Include replacement of thegymnasium flooring.



BuildingAddition (1994)54,663 ft

Sum Comments

Paint: $2.00sq.ft. Required $109,326.00(partial finish - floor area/prep and installation)

Acoustic Ceiling: $3.50sq.ft.(Qty)

54,663 Required$191,320.50(partial finish - tear out and replace per area)

Complete Replacement ofFinishes and Casework:

$14.30sq.ft. Required $502,988.20(elementary, per building area, with removal of existing)

Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00perstall

10 Required 3 Required $13,000.00(removing and replacing)

Toilet AccessoryReplacement

$0.20sq.ft. Required Required $17,967.40(per building area)

Resilient Wood/SyntheticFlooring

$12.85sq.ft.(Qty)

9,322 Required $119,787.70(tear-out and replace per area)

Total Kitchen EquipmentReplacement:

$141.00sq.ft.(Qty)

1,842 Required $259,722.00(square footage based upon only existing area of food preparation,serving, kitchen storage areas and walk-ins. Includes demolit ion andremoval of existing kitchen equipment)

Sum: $1,214,111.80$779,745.00 $434,366.80


http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-


19/46

Facility Assessment

K. Interior Lighting

Description: The entire complex contains fluorescent and incandescent lighting. The lighting levels are: gymnasium11.8 FC, student dining 78 FC, kitchen85.5 FC, media center 42 FC, science lab-43.9 FC, and typical classrooms-38.4 FC-66.3 FC. A portion of the classrooms are equipped with duallevel lighting.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of lighting due to addition of a suppression system and HVAC systems.



Sum Comments

Complete Building Lighting Replacement$5.00sq.ft. Required Required $449,185.00Includes demo of existing fixtures

Sum: $449,185.00 $175,870.00 $273,315.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-


20/46

Facility Assessment

L. Security Systems

Description: The current security system is a motion sensor security system with magnetic lock controlled entry. Site lighting is provided by a combination ofbuilding mounted and a few pole mounted fixtures. The provisions provide limited illumination of the exterior site.


Recommendations: Provide upgrade of the current security system and exterior lighting due to OSDM standards.


Security System: $1.50sq.ft. Required Required $134,755.50(complete, area of building)

Exterior Site Lighting:$1.00sq.ft. Required Required $89,837.00building

Sum: $224,592.50 $87,935.00 $136,657.50


http://-/?-http://-/?-


21/46

Facility Assessment

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

Description: The complex is equipped with exit signs and emergency egress lighting. The system was updated in the recent past. A portion of the existingfixture installations are ceiling mounted and will be disturbed by recommended renovation work.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of the emergency/egress lighting due to addition of sprinkler and HVAC systems.


Emergency/Egress Lighting:$1.00sq.ft. Required Required $89,837.00(complete, area of building)

Sum: $89,837.00 $35,174.00 $54,663.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


22/46

Facility Assessment

N. Fire Alarm

Description: The complex is equipped with a fire alarm system with manual pull stations with zoned detection and horn/strobe signals. The existing system islacking horn/strobe signals in a portion of the occupiable rooms/spaces. The 1994 building addition is equipped with smoke detectors. A portionof equipment is ceiling mounted and wil l be disturbed by recommended renovation work.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of the fire alarm system. Provide an addressable system with horn/strobe signals in all occupiable rooms/spacesthroughout the entire complex.



Sum Comments

Fire Alarm System:$1.50sq.ft. Required Required $134,755.50(complete new system, including removal of existing)

Sum: $134,755.50 $52,761.00 $81,994.50


http://-/?-http://-/?-


23/46

Facility Assessment

O. Handicapped Access

Description: The existing complex provides partial accessibility but does not fully conform to the provisions of the ADA guidelines in all areas. A portion of thetoilet rooms/restrooms at the 1969 addition were renovated to provide accessible accommodations. However, the modifications are incompleteand/or are an inappropriate application of the ADA guidelines. The majority of the drinking fountains at the 1969 addition are not accessible. Aportion of the existing door assemblies do not provide the required maneuvering clearances or are not equipped wi th accessible hardware. The1994 addition was designed to provide accessible accommmodations but a portion of the existing lavatories are lacking pipe insulation protectionor accessible hardware. The original toilet/shower facilities that were incorporated into the new addition area were not renovated to provideaccessible accommodations. A portion of the toilet partitions at the 1994 building are deteriorated. The complex is equipped with an elevator.

Rating:3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide for full accessibility throughout the entire complex in conformance with the provisions of the ADA and OSFC requirements.




Sum Comments

Signage: $0.10sq.ft. Required Required $8,983.70(per building area)

Ramps: $40.00sq.ft.(Qty)

28 Required 28 Required $2,240.00(per ramp/interior-exterior complete)

Electric Water Coolers: $3,000.00unit 3 Required $9,000.00(new double ADA)

Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $3,800.00unit 21 Required 9 Required $114,000.00(new ADA)

Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00stall 5 Required $5,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included)

ADA Assist Door &Frame:

$7,500.00unit 1 Required $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc)

Replace Doors: $1,100.00leaf 44 Required 2 Required $50,600.00(standard 3070 wood door, HM frame-classroom door/light, includeshardware)

Replace Doors: $5,000.00leaf 5 Required 2 Required $35,000.00(rework narrow opening to provide 3070 wood door, HM frame, door/light,includes hardware)

Replace Doors: $5,000.00leaf 4 Required $20,000.00(rework opening and corridor wall to accommodate ADA standards whendoor opening is set back from edge of corridor and cannot accommodate awheelchair.)

Other: ADA Shower $5,000.00each 1 Required $5,000.00ADA Shower

Other: ShowerControls/Faucets

$500.00each 1 Required $500.00Shower Controls/Faucets

Other: Pipe Insulation $100.00each 9 Required $900.00Pipe Insulation

Sum: $258,723.70 $194,337.40 $64,386.30


http://-/?-http://-/?-


24/46

Facility Assessment

P. Site Condition

Description: Buses load/unload at the main entry to the school complex and share a common path of travel with vehicular traffic. Asphalt pavements displaysigns of deterioration. Sidewalks are cracked and raised in some areas. A portion of the existing egress doors are lacking an accessible path oftravel. Portions of the site were covered with snow at the time of the site visit, thus hindering full assessment of site conditions.


Recommendations: Replace deteriorated walks and pavements. Provide a dedicated bus loading/unloading zone. Provide a walkway system and an accessible pathof travel from all egress doors.


OriginalBuilding (1969)35,174 ft


Sum Comments

Replace Existing Asphalt Paving: $30.00sq. yard 3,454 Requi red 5,403 Requi red $265,710.00( including drainage / tear out for light or heavy dutyasphalt)

Bus Drop-Off for Middle $110.00perstudent

800 Required $88,000.00(Number of students should be rounded up to thenearest 100. $5500 per bus; 40 students per bus; 80of middle school students riding)

Concrete Curb: $15.00ln.ft. 78 Required 120 Required $2,970.00(new)

Concrete Sidewalk: $4.00sq.ft.(Qty)

2,155 Required 3,370 Required $22,100.00(5 in exterior slab)

Base Sitework Allowance for UnforeseenCircumstances

$50,000.00allowance Required $50,000.00Include this and one of the next two. (Applies for whobuilding, so only one addition should have this item)

Sitework Allowance for UnforeseenCircumstances for buildings between 0 SFand 100,000 SF

$1.50sq.ft. Required Required $134,755.50Include this one or the next. (Each addition should hathis item)

Sum: $563,535.50 $304,171.00 $259,364.50


http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-


25/46

Facility Assessment

Q. Sewage System

Description: The facility is served by an on-site sewage treatment plant. District officials noted the system was not appropriately sized for the scope of theschool complex and identified the maintenance of the system has been an ongoing issue of concern.


Recommendations: Replace/redesign on-site sewage treatment system.


On-Site Sewage Treatment System:$225.00per student 732 Required $164,700.00(per student at middle/high)

Sum: $164,700.00 $164,700.00 $0.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


26/46

Facility Assessment

R. Water Supply

Description: The complex water supply is copper. The structure is served by the local municipal system. District officials noted the system was satisfactory.



Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1969)

35,174 ft

Building Addition (1994)

54,663 ft

SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


27/46

Facility Assessment

S. Exterior Doors

Description: The existing door assemblies are a combination of newer and dated installations. A portion of the assemblies are deteriorated and/or containsingle pane glazing. The storefront door assemblies at the 1994 building addition contain single pane glazing.


Recommendations: Provide for replacement of dated/deteriorated door assemblies. Replace door assemblies equipped with single pane glazing with thermallyefficient installations.



Sum Comments

Door Leaf/Frame and Hardware:$2,000.00per leaf 8 Required 8 Required $32,000.00(includes removal of existing)

Sum: $32,000.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


28/46

Facility Assessment

T. Hazardous Material

Description: District officials have provided information identifying hazardous materials in this facility.


Recommendations: Remove all hazardous materials as identified by the Hazardous Materials Consultant. A full EEHA assessment will be required to verify theaccuracy of the provided information.


Environmental Hazards Form EHA Form

Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic$3.00sq.ft. (Qty) 63,000 Required $189,000.00See J

Sum: $189,000.00 $189,000.00 $0.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


29/46

Facility Assessment

U. Life Safety

Description: The entire complex is not equipped with an automatic fire suppression system. A portion of the interior stair assemblies are not enclosed and thehandrail/guardrail systems do not conform to current code provisions or ADA accessibility requirements.


Recommendations: Provide an automated fire suppression system throughout the entire complex. Enclose open stair assemblies and provide compliant handrailsystems.



Building Addition(1994)54,663 ft

Sum Comments

Sprinkler / Fire SuppressionSystem:

$3.25sq.ft.(Qty)

35,174 Required 54,663 Required $291,970.25(includes increase of service piping, if required)

Interior Stairwell Closure: $5,000.00per level 4 Required $20,000.00(includes associated doors, door frames andhardware)

Handrails: $5,000.00level 4 Required 2 Required $30,000.00

Sum: $341,970.25 $154,315.50 $187,654.75


http://-/?-http://-/?-


30/46

Facility Assessment

V. Loose Furnishings

Description: Typical classrooms are furnished with a combination of newer and older equipment. The majority of the 1994 building addition is equipped withnewer aged furnishings.


Recommendations: Provide for furnishing replacement based upon the rating of 7 given for item 6.17 of the attached CEFPI rating.


CEFPI Rating 7$2.00sq.ft. Required Required $179,674.00

Sum: $179,674.00 $70,348.00 $109,326.00


http://-/?-http://-/?-


31/46

Facility Assessment

W. Technology

Description: Typical classrooms are equipped with 1-5 data ports for teacher and student use, televisions, ceiling mounted projectors and smart boards.Classrooms are not equipped with telephones.


Recommendations: Replace all wiring due to extensive renovation to be undertaked and to fully conform to OSDM standards.


MS portion of building with total SF 67,951 to 91,650$7.47sq.ft. (Qty) 35,174 Required 54,663 Required $671,082.39

Sum: $671,082.39 $262,749.78 $408,332.61


http://-/?-http://-/?-


32/46

Facility Assessment

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

Renovation Costs (A-W) $8,334,738.14

7.00% Construct ion Contingency $583,431.67

Subtotal $8,918,169.81

16.20% Non-Construct ion Costs $1,444,743.51

Total Project $10,362,913.32

Construction Contingency $583,431.67

Non-Construction Costs $1,444,743.51

Total for X. $2,028,175.18

Non-Construction Costs Breakdown

Land Survey 0.03% $2,675.45

Soil Borings 0.10% $8,918.17

Agency Approval Fees 0.15% $13,377.25

Construction Testing 0.25% $22,295.42

Printing 0.27% $24,079.06

Advertising 0.03% $2,675.45

Builders Risk 0.11% $9,809.99

Design Professional Compensation 7.50% $668,862.74

CM Compensation 6.00% $535,090.19

Commissioning 0.33% $29,429.96

Maintenance Plan Advisor 0.11% $9,809.99

Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services) 1.32% $117,719.84

Total Non-Construction Costs 16.20% $1,444,743.51


http://-/?-http://-/?-


33/46

School Facility Appraisal

Name of Appraiser Jeff Tuckerman Date of Appraisal 2008-03-17

Building Name LaMuth Middle School

Street Address 6700 Auburn Rd

City/Town, State, Zip Code Painesville, OH 44077

Telephone Number(s) (440) 354-4394

School District Riverside Local Local SD

Setting: Small City

Site-Acreage 48 Building Square Footage 89,837

Grades Housed 6-7 Student Capacity 633

Number of Teaching Stations 38 Number of Floors 2

Student Enrollment 732

Dates of Construction 1969,1994

Energy Sources: Fuel Oil Gas Electric Solar

Air Conditioning: Roof Top Windows Units Central Room Units

Heating: Central Roof Top Individual Unit Forced Air

Hot Water Steam

Type of Construction

Load bearing masonry

Steel frame

Concrete frame

Wood

Steel Joists

Exterior Surfacing

Brick

Stucco

Metal

Wood

Stone

Floor Construction

Wood Joists

Steel Joists

Slab on grade

Structural slab


Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:School Facility Appraisal Page 33
http://-/?-http://-/?-


34/46

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

1.0 The School Site


Points Allocated Points

1.1 Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements 25 25

The building sits on a 48 acre site.

1.2 Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population 20 18

The site is geographically located to serve the school community.

1.3 Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards 10 10

The site is located in a residential area with light traffic.

1.4 Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs 10 9

The site contains mature trees, low shrubbery, lawn areas and nearby woods.

1.5 ES Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areas 10 9

MS Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parking

HS Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking

The site is equipped with athletic fields and large parking areas.

1.6 Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines 5 5

The site is relatively flat without steep inclines.

1.7 Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion 5 5

There were no significant areas of ponding or erosion.

1.8 Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning 5 4

There was no designated area for this activi ty. Portions of the site surrounding the school complex are wooded.

1.9 Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes 5 3

Sidewalks are deteriorated in some areas. Portions of the site are lacking a continuous path of travel.

1.10 ES/MS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided 5 5

HS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community

District officals noted there was adequate parking at this facility.

TOTAL - The School Site 100 93


Report Generated at 26 Aug 2008 16:CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 34
http://-/?-http://-/?-


35/46

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features


StructuralPoints

AllocatedPoints

2.1 Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally 15 10

A portion of the complex provides accessible accommodations but the provisions do not fully conform to the ADA guidelines.

2.2 Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight 15 10

The roofs are comprised of modified bituminous systems. Installations are a combination of newer and older assemblies. A portion of the roofs are dated.

2.3 Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks 10 8

There were no significant signs of deterioration, settlement, or cracking.

2.4 Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration 10 9

A portion of the complex was equipped wi th control joints. There were no significant areas of deterioration.

2.5 Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow 10 8

The location of exits is adequate for student circulation.

2.6 Building envelope generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) 10 7

The majority of the existing window assemblies are dated and contain single pane glazing at the original facility.

2.7 Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials 10 7

District officials provided a hazardous materials report indicating areas of known asbestos.

2.8 Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes 10 7

The original 1969 facility was not designed for flexibility of use.

Mechanical/ElectricalPoints

AllocatedPoints

2.9 Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating 15 12

Lighting levels do not conform to OSDM standards in some areas.

2.10 Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements 15 13

Domestic supply piping is copper. No pressure problems were reported by District officials.

2.11 Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technology applications 15 9

Typical classrooms are equipped with 1-5 data ports and a portion of the classrooms are equipped with projectors and smart boards. Classrooms are not equippedwith telephones.



36/46

2.12 Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible 10 8

Electrical sevice panels are located in the mechanical areas.

2.13 Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions for thedisabled

10 6

A portion of drinking fountains were not accessible and do not provide multi-height accommodations.

2.14 Number and size of restrooms meet requirements 10 7

A portion of the toilet facilities were not accessible and do not conform to the provisions of the ADA.

2.15 Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 7

The complex is served by an on site sewage system. District officials noted the system was oversized and as a result is not functioning appropriately.

2.16 Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 6

The facility is not equipped wi th a suppression system. The fire alarm system is lacking horn/strobe signals in some occupiable areas.

2.17 Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication between the officeand instructional areas

10 5

Classrooms are not equipped with telephones.

2.18 Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage 5 4

Hose bibb connections are provided at the exterior of the structure.

TOTAL - Structural and Mechanical Features 200 143


http://-/?-http://-/?-


37/46

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

3.0 Plant Maintainability


Points Allocated Points

3.1 Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance 15 10

The majority of window installations at the 1969 building are dated and are equipped with single pane glazing.

3.2 Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care 15 12

Floor surfaces were terrazzo, carpet, and vinyl tile.

3.3 Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain 10 8

Suspended acoustic ceilings are provided in most areas.

3.4 Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance 10 7

Casework installations are limited. The majority of casework is dated at older portions of the complex.

3.5 Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality 10 7

The majority of the door assemblies were not equipped with lever/ADA compliant hardware at older portions of the complex.

3.6 Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish 10 7

The fixtures were a combination of wall and floor mounted units. Original/dated installations remain in some areas.

3.7 Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building 10 8

Custodial space is typically provided near toilet rooms.

3.8 Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area 10 8

School officials noted electrical provisions were adequate to serve the facilitys current needs.

3.9 Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement 10 8

Exterior lighting was provided primarily by building mounted fixtures.

TOTAL - Plant Maintainability 100 75


http://-/?-http://-/?-


38/46

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

4.0 Building Safety and Security


Site Safety Points Allocated Points

4.1 Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways 15 10

Bus circulation shares a common path of travel with vehicular traffic.

4.2 Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians 10 6

Walkways are deteriorated in some areas. A portion of the site is lacking a continuous path of travel.

4.3 Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area 5 3

The main ingress/egress drive is not equipped with a signal system.

4.4 Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow 5 4

Vehicular entrances were not equipped with turning lanes.

4.5 ES Playground equipment is free from hazard 5 4

MS Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazard

HS Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard

The facility is equipped with athletic fields.

Building Safety Points Allocated Points

4.6 The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas 20 15

The boilers were located in the mechanical areas. Classrooms were equipped with unit ventilators.

4.7 Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress 15 12

The facility contains multiple stair assemblies. A portion of the installations were not enclosed in rated assemblies.

4.8 Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware 10 8

Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic devices. A portion of installations are dated.

4.9 Emergency lighting is provided throughout the enti re bui lding wi th exit signs on separate electrical circuits 10 8

The facility was equipped with an emergency/egress lighting system.

4.10 Classroom doors are recessed and open outward 10 7

A portion of classroom doors are recessed and open outward.

4.11 Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program 10 5

The facility contains a motion sensor system. District officials noted the system was not adequate to serve the needs of the school.



39/46

4.12 Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition 5 4

Classrooms/educational areas were equipped with vinyl tile. Corridors were terrazzo. A portion of finishes were deteriorated.

4.13 Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 5 4

Stair risers do not exceed 7.

4.14 Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury 5 4

Safety glazing was identified at some locations.

4.15 Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall 5 4

Drinking fountains project into corridors.

4.16 Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress 5 3

Main corridors lead to exits. A portion of the exits were unenclosed and do not egress directly to the exterior.

Emergency Safety Points Allocated Points

4.17 Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located 15 13

Fire extinguishers were provided throughout the facility.

4.18 There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building 15 12

Remote means of egress were provided from most areas. A portion of the exits from the second floor do not discharge directly to the exterior.

4.19 Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure 15 8

Rated assemblies could not be identified at the older portions of the structure.

4.20 Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided 15 12

The facility is equipped with a fire alarm system with manual pull stations. A portion of the occupiable spaces are lacking horn/strobe signals.

TOTAL - Building Safety and Security 200 146


http://-/?-http://-/?-


40/46

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

5.0 Educational Adequacy


Academic Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.1 Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards 25 20

Typical classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.2 Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity 15 10

There is no designated space for this activi ty. Classrooms are undersized.

5.3 Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive noise 10 9

The media center was centrally located on the main floor near the classroom wing.

5.4 Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students 10 5

There is no designated space for this activi ty. Classrooms are undersized.

5.5 Storage for student materials is adequate 10 7

A portion of locker installations are dated.

5.6 Storage for teacher materials is adequate 10 5

Storage space is limited. There is little casework in classrooms.

Special Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.7 Size of special learning area(s) meets standards 15 9

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.8 Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need 10 7

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to current standards established by the State of Ohio.

5.9 Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space 10 10

The media center is a recent addition to the complex and provides a pleasant environment.

5.10 Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction 5 3

Vinyl asbestos tile is suspected at the gymnasium floor.

5.11 ES Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instruction 10 7

MS/HS Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standards established by the State of Ohio.



41/46

5.12 Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space 5 4

Music education takes place in dedicated classrooms. Band and choir are provided separate classroom areas.

5.13 Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment 5 3

Classrooms are undersized and do not conform to the current standard established by the State of Ohio.

School Facility Appraisal Points Allocated Points

5.14 Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment 5 5

Technology education takes place in a dedicated classroom at the 1994 complex.

5.15 Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms 5 1

There is no designated space for this activity.

5.16 Storage for student and teacher material is adequate 5 3

Classroom storage provisions are limited.

Support Space Points Allocated Points

5.17 Teachers lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals 10 9

Teacher lounge/work areas are provided adjacent to the classroom wings.

5.18 Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation 10 8

The student dining and kitchen are located in the original 1969 structure. The majority of kitchen equipment is dated.

5.19 Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturi ty of the students served 5 4

Administrative offices are located adjacent to the main entry at the 1994 addition.

5.20 Counselors office insures privacy and sufficient storage 5 4

Counselors office is located at the administration area.

5.21 Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements 5 4

The clinic is equipped with accessible toilet facilities. The lavatory is lacking accessible hardware and insulation.

5.22 Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors 5 4

Administrative areas are located near the main entry of the complex at the 1994 addition. The area provides a pleasant environment.

5.23 Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy 5 4

The administrative area provides a pleasant environment.

TOTAL - Educational Adequacy 200 145


http://-/?-http://-/?-


42/46

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

6.0 Environment for Education


Exterior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.1 Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students 15 14

Exterior masonry construction is appropriate for educational design. The 1994 addition provides a pleasant design.

6.2 Site and building are well landscaped 10 9

The site contains mature trees, low shrubbery, open lawn, and nearby woods.

6.3 Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning 10 10

The site is located in a residential area with overhangs.

6.4 Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather 10 5

The majority of entrances were not equipped with overhangs.

6.5 Building materials provide attractive color and texture 5 4

The 1994 building addition provides an attractive design wi th varied materials and colors.

Interior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.6 Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning 20 16

Interior finishes at the 1994 addition provide a pleasant environment with a unif ied color scheme.

6.7 Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building 15 7

A limited poriton of the facility is not equipped with air conditioning.

6.8 Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement 15 9

The ventilation system does not conform to current OSDM standards at older portions of the complex.

6.9 Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination 15 10

Lighting levels are below OSDM standards in some areas.

6.10 Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located 15 10

Toilet rooms are located at dispersed areas. A portion of the facilities provide accessible accommodations.

6.11 Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization 10 9

The gymnasiums, student dining, media center, and lobby provide common areas for socialization.

6.12 Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors 10 9



43/46

Corridors are sized for student circulation.

6.13 Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group 10 9

The gymnasiums, student dining area, lobby, and the media center provide areas for interaction.

6.14 Large group areas are designed for effective management of students 10 8

The gymnasium is equipped with a retracting screen.

6.15 Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control 10 8

Acoustic ceilings are provided in most areas.

6.16 Window design contributes to a pleasant environment 10 8

The majority of the window assemblies at the 1969 addition are equipped with single pane glazing and narrow openings.

6.17 Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere 10 7

The majority of the existing furniture is a combination of newer and dated equipment.

TOTAL - Environment for Education 200 152


http://-/?-http://-/?-


44/46


45/46


Building Summary - LaMuth Middle School (61895)





Bldg. IRN: 61895



Phone: (440) 354-4394










Total 89,837


*Rating =1 Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C





F. Windows 3 $83,520.00 -




J. General Finishes 3 $1,214,111.80 -




N. Fire Alarm 3 $134,755.50 -







U. Life Safety 3 $341,970.25 -


W. Technology 3 $671,082.39 -


- $2,028,175.18 -

Total $10,362,913.32









Commentary


C=Under Contract




Previous Page



46/46

Environmental Hazards - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895) - Original Building

Environmental Hazards - Riverside Local Local SD (47894) - LaMuth Middle School (61895) - Original Building

Owner: Riverside Local Local SD Bldg. IRN: 61895

Facility: LaMuth Middle School BuildingAdd: Original Building

Date: Consultant Name:

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Materia

ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost

1. Boiler/Furnace/Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.002. Tank/Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00

3. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00

4. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00

5. Acoustical Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00

6. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.00

7. Hard Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00

8. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00

9. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00

10. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 63000 $3.00 $189,000.00

11. Roofing Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00

12. (Sum of Lines 1-11) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $189,000.00

13. (Sum of Lines 1-9) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $0.00

B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported

Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost

1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00

C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 1980

1. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $0.00

2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups $0.00

3. (Sum of Lines 1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00

D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not Applicable

Area Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost

1. 35174 0 $0.05 $0.00

E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None Reported

Description Cost Estimate

1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation $0.00

2. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition $0.00

F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries

1. A12, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $189,000.002. A13, B1, D1, and E2 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $0.00

* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM):

a. Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.

b. Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster,acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and ti les; fireproofing; 12"12" floor tile and mastic.

c. Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.

THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.

Documents

LaMuth Middle School - Riverside School District - State Facilities Report