Lafayette County Data Profile 2017 Data Profile... · This version visualizes 2015/16 HCMS data. The purpose of the NEFEC Data Profile is to provide valuable data to aid in decision

Lafayette County Data Profile

Spring 2017 – HCMS and PL Update

Please contact us with

any questions at

[email protected]

http://www.nefec.org/

http://www.nefec.org/

mailto:[email protected]

• HCMS Data

• NEFEC District and School Grade Reports

• NEFEC Professional Learning Data

• Student Achievement Data• English Language Arts

• Math

• Science

• Social Studies

Spring 2017 - HCMS and PL Update 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DATA

Foreword:

This version visualizes 2015/16 HCMS data.

The purpose of the NEFEC Data Profile is to provide valuable data to aid in decision making regarding recruitment activities,

selection, professional learning programs, and accountability. Data can be used to identify areas of strength as well as

actionable items for opportunities for growth and refinement. The Data Profile includes data from the FLDOE FY 1516 Survey

5 Staff Demographic information and local district reports containing Years of Experience, Certification Types and Educational

Institutions where degrees were earned. The focus group includes employees with job codes associated with EEO lines 21-

33 (excluding subs).

This includes the following:

Elementary Teachers

Secondary Teachers

Exceptional Student Education Teachers

Other Teachers (e.g., Adult, Specialists, Other instruction)


4

53; 77%

15; 22%

1; 1%

2014/15 Teacher Evaluations

Highly Effective

Effective

No Evaluation Record

59; 83%

10; 14%

2; 3%

2015/16 Teacher Evaluations

Highly Effective

Effective

Not Evaluated

Teachers By Evaluation Category – 2015/16

Spring 2017 - HCMS and PL Update

5

54; 76%

15; 21%

2; 3%

Bachelor's Degree

Master's Degree

Other Degree

Teachers By Degree Type – 2015/16


6

43; 73%

14; 24%

2; 3%

Highly Effective

9; 90%

1; 10%

0; 0%

Effective

2; 100%

0; 0%0; 0%

Not Evaluated

Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Other Degree

Teachers By Degree Type – 2015/16


Teachers By Certification Type – 2015/16


59

10

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Highly Effective Effective Not Evaluated

Nu

mb

er o

f Te

ach

ers

Certification Type Comparisons

REGULAR/PROFESSIONAL 3 YR TEMPORARY NON-RENEWABLE OTHER

71; 100%

Total Teacher Population

REGULAR/PROFESSIONAL 3 YR TEMPORARY NON-RENEWABLE OTHER

8

1718

25

10

1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Num

ber

of T

eachers

0 - 5 Years 6 - 10 Years 11 -20 Years 21 - 30 Years 31 - 40+ Years

17; 24%

18; 25%

25; 35%

10; 14%

1; 2%

Total Years of Experience Within the District

0 - 5 Years 6 - 10 Years 11 -20 Years 21 - 30 Years 31 - 40+ Years

Teachers By Years of Experience Within Lafayette –2015/16


9

14; 24%

15; 25%20; 34%

9; 15%

1; 2%

Highly Effective

Teachers By Years of Experience Within Lafayette –2015/16

3; 30%

3; 30%

3; 30%

1; 10%

Effective

0 - 5 Years 6 - 10 Years 11 -20 Years

21 - 30 Years 31 - 40+ Years

2; 100%

Not Evaluated


10

5; 7%

64; 93%

2014/15 – Teacher Turnover

Separated Retained


Retentions and Separations – 2015/16

6; 8%

65; 92%

2015/16 - Teacher Turnover

Separated Retained

11Spring 2017 - HCMS and PL Update

Retentions and Separations – 2015/16

3; 50%3; 50%

Separations Codes Used in 2015/16

Retirement

Resignation forother personalreasons

5; 8%

54; 92%

Highly Effective Turnover

Separated

Retained

1; 50%1; 50%

Not Evaluated Turnover

Separated

Retained

2

3

0

1

2

3

4

5

Retirement Resignation for otherpersonal reasons

Highly Effective Separations

1

0

1

2

3

4

5

Retirement

Not Evaluated Separations

Absenteeism excluding Temp Duty Elsewhere

12; 18%

46; 70%

5; 8%

3; 4%

2014/15 Teacher Absences – Including TDE


11; 15%

46; 65%

12; 17%

2; 3%

2015/16 Teacher Absences - Inclduing TDE

0-10 Days

11-20 Days

21-30 Days

31-40+ Days

Teacher Absenteeism – 2015/16


Teacher Absences – Including TDE – 2015/16

9

38

11

1 1

8

1 1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0-10 Days 11-20 Days 21-30 Days 31-40+ Days 0-10 Days 11-20 Days 21-30 Days 0-10 Days

Highly Effective Highly Effective Highly Effective Highly Effective Effective Effective Effective Not Evaluated

Nu

mb

er o

f Te

ach

ers

55; 80%

11; 16%

2; 3% 1; 1%

2014/15 Teacher Absences - Excluding TDE


50, 71%

18, 25%

2, 3% 1, 1%

2015/16 Teacher Absences - Excluding TDE

0-10 Days

11-20 Days

21-30 Days

31-40+ Days

Teacher Absenteeism – 2015/16


Teacher Absences – Excluding TDE – 2015/16

42

15

2

7

3

1 1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

0-10 Days 11-20 Days 21-30 Days 0-10 Days 11-20 Days 0-10 Days 31-40+ Days

Highly Effective Highly Effective Highly Effective Effective Effective Not Evaluated Not Evaluated

Nu

mb

er o

f TE

ach

ers

Teacher Absences by Evaluation Category – 2015/16


42; 71%

15; 26%

2; 3% 0; 0%

Highly Effective - Excluding TDE

7; 70%

3; 30%

0; 0% 0; 0%

Effective - Excluding TDE

1; 50%

0; 0%0; 0%

1; 50%

Not Evaluated - Excluding TDE

9; 15%

38; 64%

11; 19%

1; 2%

Highly Effective - Including TDE

1; 10%

8; 80%

1; 10% 0; 0%

Effective - Including TDE

1; 50%

0; 0%0; 0%

1; 50%

Not Evaluated - Inclduing TDE

Teacher Absences Excluding TDE – Individual SitesCounts of teachers by ranges of ‘Days Absent’ and cross-referenced by evaluation categories. School year 2015/16 data.


Lafayette Adult Ed C - Highly Effective D - Effective H - Not Evaluated

0-10 Days 0 0 1

11-20 days 0 0 0

21-30 days 0 0 0

31-40 days 0 0 0

41-50 days 0 0 0

51-60 days 0 0 0

61-70 days 0 0 0

71-80 days 0 0 0

81+ days 0 0 0

Totals 0 0 1



Lafayette Elementary School C - Highly Effective D - Effective H - Not Evaluated

0-10 Days 21 4 0

11-20 days 8 2 0

21-30 days 2 0 0

31-40 days 0 0 0

41-50 days 0 0 0

51-60 days 0 0 0

61-70 days 0 0 0

71-80 days 0 0 1

81+ days 0 0 0

Totals 31 6 1



Lafayette High School C - Highly Effective D - Effective H - Not Evaluated

0-10 Days 21 3 0

11-20 days 7 1 0

21-30 days 0 0 0

31-40 days 0 0 0

41-50 days 0 0 0

51-60 days 0 0 0

61-70 days 0 0 0

71-80 days 0 0 0

81+ days 0 0 0

Totals 28 4 0



District Totals C - Highly Effective D - Effective H - Not Evaluated

0-10 Days 42 7 1

11-20 days 15 3 0

21-30 days 2 0 0

31-40 days 0 0 0

41-50 days 0 0 0

51-60 days 0 0 0

61-70 days 0 0 0

71-80 days 0 0 1

81+ days 0 0 0

Totals 59 10 2

21

NEFEC PROFESSIONAL LEARNING

NOTE

The PL report covers events held between July 2016 through March 2017.


Professional Learning Participation – LafayetteJuly 2016 – March 2017


Event Name Date(s)

Possible In-

Service Points

Total #

Attending

Total # of

Completions Completion %

Clinical Educator Training (CET) Fall Sept 2016 10/31/16 20 1 1 100%

District to District - Coach and TSC Strand (Secondary) 7/21/16 TBD 1 1 100%

District to District - Coach and TSC Strand (Secondary) 9/9/16-11/11/16 TBD 2 0 0%

District to District - District Leadership Sessions 7/21/16 TBD 3 1 33%

District to District - District Leadership Sessions 5/19/16-9/30/16 TBD 3 3 100%

Examining the Florida Standards: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas 10/5/16 6 1 0 0%

NEFEC CONNECT: 5th through 8th Grade Sciences - 2nd Face-to-Face 11/30/16-2/28/16 15 2 1 50%

NEFEC CONNECT: Science Grades 5 through 8 10/5/16 20 2 0 0%

NEFEC CONNECT: Sciences 5th - 8th Grade 2/3/17 12 2 1 50%

Nefec Connect: Spanish 5/18/16-12/30/16 TBD 1 0 0%

NEFEC CONNECT: Spanish 9/16/16-12/30/16 20 1 0 0%

SEEC TSC Cadre 5/13/16-9/16/16 TBD 1 0 0%

SEEC TSC Cadre 8/24/16-10/31/16 TBD 2 0 0%

US History and Civics: NEFEC CONNECT Session 3 5/25/16-12/30/16 TBD 1 0 0%

Totals 23 8 35%

Meetings/Conference Participation– LafayetteJuly 2016 – March 2017


Event Name Date(s)

Digital Classroom Program Plan Conversation 8/30/16

Digital Classroom Program Plan Conversation 8/31/16

Digital Classroom Plan Work Session 9/9/16

Fall Counselor Conference 10/4/16

Track User Group 1/11/17

Social Studies Instructional Materials Review Fair 1/27/17

NEFEC Professional Learning OfferingsThe following professional learning events were offered by the NEFEC Instructional Department between July 2016 and March 2017.


Event Name Date(s)

District to District - Coach and TSC Strand (Elementary) 7/21/16

District to District - Coach and TSC Strand (Secondary) 7/21/16

District to District - District Leadership Sessions 7/21/16

Examining the Florida Standards: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas 10/4/16

NEFEC CONNECT: Math - Geometry and Algebra I and II 10/4/16


NEFEC CONNECT: Science Grades 5 through 8 10/5/16

NEFEC CONNECT: Biology 10/13/16

K-2 Reading Foundations-Part 1 The Groundwork of Reading Instruction 10/19/16


3-5 Reading Foundations-Part 1 The Groundwork of Reading Instruction 10/23/16

Clinical Educator Training (CET) Fall Sept 2016 10/31/16

Decoding and the Struggling Reader Workshop 12/2/16

NEFEC CONNECT: Sciences 5th - 8th Grade 2/3/17

FSA Writing 2/17/17

K-2 Reading Foundations-Part 2 Effective Reading Instruction 10/18/16-2/10/17

3-5 Reading Foundations-Part 2 Effective Reading Instruction 10/19/16-2/10/17

Examining the Florida Standards: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas 11/15/16-1/15/16

24

NEFEC Professional Learning OfferingsThe following professional learning events were offered by the NEFEC Instructional Department between July 2016 and March 2017.


Event Name Date(s)K-2 Reading Foundations for Suwannee Part 1 11/30/16-2/10/17

K-2 Reading Foundations-Part 2 Effective Reading Instruction- Suwannee 11/30/16-2/10/17

NEFEC CONNECT: 5th through 8th Grade Sciences - 2nd Face-to-Face 11/30/16-2/28/16

NEFEC CONNECT: Algebra and Geometry 12/1/16-3/30/17

NEFEC CONNECT: Social Studies Learning Community 12/12/16-3/30/17

NEFEC CONNECT: Biology - 2nd Face-to-Face 12/6/16-3/30/17

Fierce Conversations Day: Columbia 2/17/17-3/23/17

SEEC TSC Cadre 5/13/16-9/16/16

Nefec Connect: Spanish 5/18/16-12/30/16

District to District - District Leadership Sessions 5/19/16-9/30/16

US History and Civics: NEFEC CONNECT Session 3 5/25/16-12/30/16

Learning-Focused The High Performance Lesson 7/12/16-7/13/16

Clinical Educator Training (CET) Fall 2016 8/11/16-10/30/16

SEEC TSC Cadre 8/23/16-10/31/16

SEEC TSC Cadre 8/24/16-10/31/16

NEFEC CONNECT: Spanish 9/16/16-12/30/16

NEFEC Connect: New Teacher Network 9/29/16-12/5/16

District to District - District Leadership Strand 9/8/16-11/11/16

District to District - Coach and TSC Strand (Elementary) 9/9/16-11/11/16

District to District - Coach and TSC Strand (Secondary) 9/9/16-11/11/16

25


Reading Foundations Series

District

Rdg Fdn 3-5

Regional

Rdg Fdn K-2

Regional

Rdg Fdn

Suwannee Totals

Baker 2 3 5

Bradford 12 12

Columbia 1 1

Gilchrist 4 10 14

Hamilton 1 1

Levy 2 13 15

Suwannee 1 28 29

Union 10 5 15

Totals 19 45 28 92

2

4

21

10

3

12

1

10

1

13

5

28

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Baker Bradford Columbia Gilchrist Hamilton Levy Suwannee Union

Nu

mb

er o

f P

arti

cip

ants

Rdg Fdn 3-5 Regional Rdg Fdn K-2 Regional Rdg Fdn Suwannee

NEFEC Regional Professional Learning SeriesJuly 2016 – March 2017


Integration of

Knowledge and Ideas

District

Integration of

Knowledge Grand Total

Baker 1 1

Bradford 11 11

Columbia 22 22

Dixie 1 1

Gilchrist 5 5

Lafayette 3 3

Levy 32 32

Putnam 46 46

Union 21 21

Grand Total 142 142

1

11

22

1

5

3

32

46

21

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Baker Bradford Columbia Dixie Gilchrist Lafayette Levy Putnam Union

Nu

mb

er o

f p

arti

cip

ants



FLICC - Mathematics

District Number of Teachers

Bradford 4

Citrus 17

Columbia 5

Gilchrist 18

Hamilton 4

Lafayette 3

Levy 27

Putnam 15

Suwannee 6

Union 5

Grand Total 104

4

17

5

18

43

27

15

65

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Bradford Citrus Columbia Gilchrist Hamilton Lafayette Levy Putnam Suwannee Union

Nu

mb

er o

f P

arti

cip

ants



NEFEC CONNECT 2016/17 Participation Summary ReportDistrict

Algebra &

Geometry Biology

New Teacher

Network Science (5-8) Social Studies Spanish Per District Total

Baker 1 27 1 4 1 34

Bradford 3 1 19 7 5 35

Columbia 6 1 12 4 1 24

FSDB 2 2 1 5

FSU Lab School 1 1

Gilchrist 1 1

Hamilton 3 1 6 2 4 16

Lafayette 2 1 3

Levy 3 3 8 6 8 1 29

UF Lab School 1 1 2

Putnam 2 10 12

Suwannee 1 1

Union 4 21 7 3 35

Community Total 23 9 83 49 31 3 198



13

6

2 3 31

41

1

13

1 2

2719

2

6

8

21

1

7

12

1

1

2

2

6

10

7

45

4

1

4

1

8

1

31

1

1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Baker Bradford Columbia FSDB FSU Lab School Gilchrist Hamilton Lafayette Levy UF Lab School Putnam Suwannee Union

Nu

mb

er o

F Te

ach

ers

NEFEC CONNECT 2015/16 Participation

Algebra & Geometry Biology New Teacher Network Science (5-8) Social Studies Spanish


31

DISTRICT AND SCHOOL GRADES


32

Preliminary District GradesNEFEC Region

English

Language Arts

Achievement

English

Language Arts

Learning

Gains

English

Language Arts

Learning

Gains of the

Lowest 25%

Mathematics

Achievement

Mathematics

Learning

Gains

Mathematics

Learning

Gains of the

Lowest 25%

Science

Achievement

Social Studies

Achievement

Middle School

Acceleration

Graduation

Rate 2014-15

College and

Career

Acceleration

2014-15

Total Points

Earned

Percent of

Total Possible

Points

Preliminary

Grade 2016

Informational

Baseline

Grade 2015

BAKER 47% 45% 37% 58% 53% 44% 47% 63% 40% 82% 54% 570 52% C B

BRADFORD 40% 41% 43% 39% 47% 40% 44% 51% 55% 77% 38% 515 47% C C

COLUMBIA 50% 48% 39% 55% 50% 46% 58% 65% 56% 71% 39% 577 52% C B

DIXIE 53% 53% 48% 49% 46% 46% 53% 67% 47% 97% 49% 608 55% B B

FLAGLER 58% 51% 39% 61% 55% 42% 56% 70% 60% 77% 40% 609 55% B B

GILCHRIST 56% 49% 40% 61% 56% 46% 66% 70% 59% 94% 72% 669 61% B A

HAMILTON 26% 33% 34% 39% 35% 34% 30% 43% 25% 74% 62% 435 40% D D

LAFAYETTE 50% 52% 51% 59% 51% 43% 60% 64% 64% 87% 60% 641 58% B B

LEVY 42% 47% 43% 48% 47% 40% 51% 73% 45% 82% 54% 572 52% C B

NASSAU 63% 54% 44% 65% 58% 47% 68% 73% 52% 91% 60% 675 61% B A

PUTNAM 37% 42% 35% 40% 41% 36% 37% 50% 49% 55% 45% 467 42% C C

SUWANNEE 44% 45% 39% 44% 48% 42% 48% 62% 58% 68% 65% 563 51% C B

UNION 54% 47% 36% 69% 57% 48% 55% 76% 50% 78% 60% 630 57% B A

UF PKY68% 57% 44% 68% 64% 49% 65% 89% 76% 97% 60% 737 67% A A


33

ELA District Grade Components - 2015/16District Averages Within The NEFEC Region

47%45%

37%40% 41%

43%

50%48%

39%

53% 53%

48%

58%

51%

39%

56%

49%

40%

26%

33% 34%

50%52% 51%

42%

47%

43%

63%

54%

44%

37%

42%

35%

44% 45%

39%

54%

47%

36%

68%

57%

44%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

English Language Arts Achievement English Language Arts Learning Gains English Language Arts Learning Gains of the Lowest 25%

BAKER BRADFORD COLUMBIA DIXIE FLAGLER GILCHRIST HAMILTON LAFAYETTE LEVY NASSAU PUTNAM SUWANNEE UNION UF PKY


34

Math District Grade Components - 2015/16District Averages Within The NEFEC Region

58%

53%

44%

39%

47%

40%

55%

50%

46%49%

46% 46%

61%

55%

42%

61%

56%

46%

39%

35% 34%

59%

51%

43%

48% 47%

40%

65%

58%

47%

40% 41%

36%

44%

48%

42%

69%

57%

48%

68%

64%

49%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Mathematics Achievement Mathematics Learning Gains Mathematics Learning Gains of the Lowest 25%



35

Science District Grade Components - 2015/16District Averages Within The NEFEC Region

47%44%

58%

53%56%

66%

30%

60%

51%

68%

37%

48%

55%

65%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Science Achievement



36

Social Studies Grade Components - 2015/16District Averages Within The NEFEC Region

47%44%

58%

53%56%

66%

30%

60%

51%

68%

37%

48%

55%

65%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Science Achievement



37

Fourth Quartile of NEFEC Schools Based on 2015/16 School Grades Data

District Name School NameELA

Achievement

ELA

Learning

Gains

ELA

Learning

Gains of the

Lowest 25%

Math

Achievement

Math

Learning

Gains

Math

Learning

Gains of the

Lowest 25%

Science

Achievement

Social

Studies

Achievement

Middle

School

Acceler.

Grad.

Rate

2014-15

College

and

Career

Acceler.

Percent of

Total

Possible

Points

Preliminary

Grade 2016

BRADFORD BRADFORD HIGH SCHOOL 0% I

BRADFORD BRADFORD INTERVENTION CENT 0% I

FLAGLER PALM HARBOR ACADEMY 0% I

HAMILTON HAMILTON COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL 0% I

PUTNAM PUTNAM EDGE HIGH SCHOOL 25% 34% 30% 15% 21% 30% 24% 26% F

PUTNAM ROBERT H. JENKINS, JUNIOR 19% 27% 23% 31% 36% 25% 15% 44% 38% 29% F

HAMILTON CENTRAL HAMILTON ELEMENTARY 22% 30% 39% 52% 42% 17% 18% 31% F

PUTNAM PUTNAM ACADEMY OF ARTS AND 30% 33% 38% 31% 27% 14% 28% 45% 46% 32% D

PUTNAM MELLON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 19% 31% 30% 24% 49% 56% 21% 33% D

PUTNAM GEORGE C. MILLER, JUNIOR 27% 39% 40% 39% 37% 31% 31% 39% 0% 35% D

PUTNAM PALATKA HIGH SCHOOL 30% 34% 29% 20% 24% 34% 36% 39% 58% 50% 35% D

PUTNAM CRESCENT CITY JUNIOR/SENIOR 31% 37% 31% 23% 34% 36% 32% 50% 51% 45% 37% D

PUTNAM C. H. PRICE MIDDLE SCHOOL 32% 40% 35% 36% 40% 39% 37% 59% 27% 38% D

PUTNAM INTERLACHEN HIGH SCHOOL 32% 39% 41% 23% 27% 23% 54% 47% 58% 38% 38% D

HAMILTON NORTH HAMILTON ELEMENTARY 30% 40% 48% 51% 41% 43% 27% 40% D

PUTNAM INTERLACHEN ELEMENTARY 41% 43% 38% 45% 45% 32% 35% 40% D

PUTNAM WILLIAM D. MOSELEY ELEMENTARY 24% 48% 57% 36% 56% 37% 21% 40% D

DIXIE JAMES M. ANDERSON ELEMENT 48% 37% 42% 56% 45% 34% 24% 41% C

LEVY CHIEFLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 41% 53% 48% 41% 30% 17% 58% 41% C

COLUMBIA MELROSE PARK ELEMENTARY 32% 36% 28% 43% 64% 55% 35% 42% C

PUTNAM C. L. OVERTURF JR 6TH GRADE 37% 43% 37% 47% 48% 43% 43% C

PUTNAM KELLEY SMITH ELEMENTARY 36% 44% 30% 46% 58% 42% 45% 43% C

PUTNAM OCHWILLA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 44% 53% 35% 56% 36% 33% 41% 43% C

COLUMBIA RICHARDSON MIDDLE SCHOOL 39% 44% 39% 39% 38% 39% 39% 56% 56% 43% C

BAKER J FRANKLYN KELLER INTER 43% 36% 24% 61% 60% 45% 37% 44% C

BRADFORD STARKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 43% 42% 27% 52% 58% 41% 42% 44% C

BRADFORD SOUTHSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 41% 43% 46% 42% 54% 49% 34% 44% C

SUWANNEE SUWANNEE INTERMEDIATE 44% 48% 41% 45% 50% 43% 38% 44% C

LEVY WILLISTON MIDDLE SCHOOL 39% 46% 44% 48% 46% 43% 36% 47% 44% C


38

Third Quartile of NEFEC Schools Based on 2015/16 School Grades Data

District Name School NameELA

Achievement

ELA

Learning

Gains

ELA

Learning

Gains

of the

Lowest

25%

Math

Achievement

Math

Learning

Gains

Math

Learning

Gains of the

Lowest 25%

Science

Achievement

Social

Studies

Achievement

Middle

School

Acceler.

Grad.

Rate

2014-15

College

and Career

Acceler.

Percent of

Total

Possible

Points

Preliminary

Grade 2016

HAMILTON

SOUTH HAMILTON ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL39% 53% 58% 49% 52% 33% 29% 45% C

SUWANNEE BRANFORD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 50% 48% 31% 57% 45% 34% 49% 45% C

LEVY BRONSON MIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL 32% 34% 30% 38% 44% 34% 49% 77% 42% 85% 32% 45% C

LEVY NATURE COAST MIDDLE SCHOOL 40% 47% 50% 31% 41% 57% 36% 64% 46% C

BRADFORD BRADFORD MIDDLE SCHOOL 41% 45% 51% 40% 52% 44% 41% 44% 55% 46% C

BRADFORD LAWTEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 54% 54% 54% 56% 57% 15% 36% 47% C

LAFAYETTE LAFAYETTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 44% 48% 50% 58% 45% 40% 46% 47% C

LEVY WILLISTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 46% 41% 36% 60% 55% 39% 49% 47% C

COLUMBIA COLUMBIA HIGH SCHOOL 40% 35% 24% 37% 41% 42% 75% 62% 73% 36% 47% C

COLUMBIA

FIVE POINTS ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL42% 55% 56% 53% 46% 37% 50% 48% C

FLAGLER BUDDY TAYLOR MIDDLE SCHOOL 50% 45% 32% 58% 52% 40% 49% 62% 45% 48% C

SUWANNEE SUWANNEE MIDDLE SCHOOL 42% 48% 42% 43% 49% 46% 45% 62% 58% 48% C

PUTNAM MIDDLETON-BURNEY ELEMENTARY 36% 57% 63% 43% 48% 47% 49% C

BRADFORD HAMPTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 49% 50% 67% 51% 46% 33% 46% 49% C

PUTNAM BROWNING-PEARCE ELEMENTARY 42% 53% 39% 59% 68% 42% 41% 49% C

SUWANNEE SUWANNEE HIGH SCHOOL 41% 41% 30% 41% 45% 40% 61% 61% 67% 66% 49% C

LEVY YANKEETOWN SCHOOL 51% 70% 72% 41% 48% 35% 33% 50% C

BAKER BAKER COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL 42% 49% 45% 60% 59% 52% 44% 60% 40% 50% C

FLAGLER FLAGLER-PALM COAST HIGH 52% 47% 36% 48% 40% 38% 60% 65% 77% 38% 50% C

LEVY WILLISTON HIGH SCHOOL 44% 42% 34% 42% 37% 33% 62% 73% 86% 49% 50% C

COLUMBIA FORT WHITE HIGH SCHOOL 43% 44% 34% 45% 47% 43% 58% 62% 57% 74% 47% 50% C

FLAGLER BUNNELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 55% 54% 38% 62% 60% 34% 53% 51% C

BAKER BAKER COUNTY SENIOR HIGH 50% 50% 38% 47% 37% 25% 61% 66% 82% 54% 51% C

DIXIE DIXIE COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL 48% 43% 32% 35% 37% 38% 63% 65% 97% 49% 51% C

SUWANNEE BRANFORD HIGH SCHOOL 46% 42% 37% 41% 44% 36% 50% 64% 60% 77% 66% 51% C

GILCHRIST TRENTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 49% 42% 39% 68% 63% 51% 55% 52% C

PUTNAM THE CHILDREN'S READING CENTER 64% 49% 44% 71% 51% 38% 50% 52% C

PUTNAM JAMES A. LONG ELEMENTARY 53% 51% 37% 53% 65% 48% 54% 52% C

NASSAU YULEE MIDDLE SCHOOL 55% 49% 42% 62% 54% 42% 57% 68% 41% 52% C


39

Second Quartile of NEFEC Schools Based on 2015/16 School Grades Data

District

NameSchool Name

ELA

Achievemen

t

ELA

Learning

Gains

ELA

Learning

Gains

of the

Lowest 25%

Math

Achievement

Math

Learning

Gains

Math

Learning

Gains of the

Lowest 25%

Science

Achievement

Social

Studies

Achievement

Middle

School

Acceler.

Grad.

Rate

2014-15

College

and Career

Acceler.

Percent of

Total

Possible

Points

Preliminary

Grade 2016

LEVY WHISPERING WINDS CHARTER 35% 50% 50% 67% 62% 53% C

COLUMBIA SUMMERS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 41% 55% 59% 56% 57% 48% 54% 53% C

FLAGLER OLD KINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 64% 51% 37% 65% 62% 45% 45% 53% C

UNION LAKE BUTLER MIDDLE SCHOOL 51% 48% 39% 65% 57% 45% 46% 74% 51% 53% C

NASSAU HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH 55% 42% 26% 65% 55% 46% 56% 65% 40% 86% 45% 53% C

COLUMBIA FORT WHITE ELEMENTARY 60% 55% 43% 64% 57% 49% 51% 54% B

COLUMBIA LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 56% 54% 44% 59% 49% 43% 52% 75% 52% 54% B

FLAGLER IMAGINE SCHOOL AT TOWN CEN 56% 56% 45% 55% 57% 55% 40% 70% 51% 54% B

DIXIE RUTH RAINS MIDDLE SCHOOL 55% 61% 56% 48% 51% 58% 47% 69% 46% 55% B

NASSAU CALLAHAN MIDDLE SCHOOL 58% 52% 48% 58% 44% 31% 66% 71% 64% 55% B

FLAGLER MATANZAS HIGH SCHOOL 60% 47% 34% 58% 45% 38% 67% 75% 81% 44% 55% B

SUWANNEE SUWANNEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 46% 58% 44% 75% 56% B

LEVY BRONSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 48% 61% 66% 63% 54% 55% 42% 56% B

FLAGLER LEWIS E. WADSWORTH ELEME 60% 56% 52% 66% 66% 51% 51% 57% B

LEVY CEDAR KEY HIGH SCHOOL 50% 51% 50% 60% 59% 52% 63% 64% 40% 93% 46% 57% B

LEVY CHIEFLAND MIDDLE HIGH SCHOOL 43% 48% 42% 47% 53% 48% 57% 75% 45% 93% 73% 57% B

COLUMBIA COLUMBIA CITY ELEMENTARY 54% 48% 39% 71% 67% 53% 76% 58% B

FLAGLER RYMFIRE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 61% 52% 44% 73% 72% 53% 51% 58% B

NASSAU WEST NASSAU COUNTY HIGH SC 52% 48% 44% 39% 48% 50% 60% 81% 96% 65% 58% B

UNION UNION COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL 55% 45% 28% 61% 52% 43% 74% 79% 81% 60% 58% B

DIXIE OLD TOWN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 59% 63% 63% 61% 52% 38% 77% 59% B

FLAGLER BELLE TERRE ELEMENTARY SC 65% 58% 50% 70% 64% 50% 54% 59% B

FLAGLER INDIAN TRAILS MIDDLE SCHOOL 65% 55% 33% 69% 55% 39% 66% 81% 71% 59% B

BRADFORD BROOKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 59% 58% 63% 63% 58% 60% B

COLUMBIA NIBLACK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 33% 65% 83% 55% 63% 85% 35% 60% B

GILCHRIST BELL HIGH SCHOOL 58% 48% 42% 55% 48% 39% 73% 69% 58% 93% 72% 60% B

LAFAYETTE LAFAYETTE HIGH SCHOOL 53% 55% 51% 60% 54% 44% 67% 64% 65% 88% 60% 60% B


40

First Quartile of NEFEC Schools Based on 2015/16 School Grades Data

District

NameSchool Name

ELA

Achievement

ELA

Learning

Gains

ELA

Learning

Gains

of the

Lowest 25%

Math

Achievement

Math

Learning

Gains

Math Learning

Gains of the

Lowest 25%

Science

Achievement

Social

Studies

Achievement

Middle

School

Acceler.

Grad.

Rate

2014-15

College

and Career

Acceler.

Percent of

Total

Possible

Points

Preliminary

Grade 2016

UNION LAKE BUTLER ELEMENTARY 60% 48% 44% 83% 65% 67% 61% B

COLUMBIA EASTSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 64% 53% 49% 76% 69% 68% 58% 62% A

GILCHRIST BELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 58% 63% 71% 59% 63% 63% 55% 62% A

NASSAU FERNANDINA BEACH MIDDLE 69% 62% 48% 73% 63% 41% 68% 76% 59% 62% A

NASSAU YULEE HIGH SCHOOL 59% 51% 41% 55% 52% 51% 88% 78% 90% 54% 62% A

GILCHRIST TRENTON HIGH SCHOOL 59% 49% 30% 65% 58% 50% 71% 71% 61% 95% 71% 62% A

COLUMBIA WESTSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 65% 54% 38% 83% 70% 65% 68% 63% A

PUTNAM Q.I. ROBERTS JR. - SR. HIGH 84% 59% 56% 53% 36% 32% 88% 94% 69% 63% A

PUTNAM MELROSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 59% 64% 48% 74% 85% 69% 51% 64% A

BAKER MACCLENNY ELEMENTARY SCH 61% 68% 65% A

BAKER WESTSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 59% 70% 65% A

NASSAU

EMMA LOVE HARDEE

ELEMENTARY72% 66% 52% 78% 71% 45% 71% 65% A

NASSAU HILLIARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 78% 70% 52% 83% 58% 54% 59% 65% A

NASSAU

CALLAHAN INTERMEDIATE

SCHOOL71% 61% 46% 83% 70% 58% 76% 66% A

NASSAU

FERNANDINA BEACH HIGH

SCHOOL66% 52% 37% 64% 61% 51% 93% 75% 90% 70% 66% A

NASSAU YULEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 64% 61% 59% 74% 74% 68% 70% 67% A

UF LAB SCH P.K. YONGE DRS 68% 57% 44% 68% 64% 49% 65% 89% 76% 97% 60% 67% A

COLUMBIA BELMONT ACADEMY 86% 64% 71% 75% 48% 45% 71% 98% 80% 71% A

COLUMBIA PINEMOUNT ELEMENTARY SCH 68% 70% 61% 84% 79% 79% 77% 74% A

NASSAU BRYCEVILLE ELEMENTARY SCH 67% 72% 78% 73% 85% 73% 80% 75% A


41

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS


2016 FSA Results - ELAStudent Achievement at Level 3 and Above

61%

38% 39%

51%

38%

59% 58%56%55%

50% 49% 49%

45%

53%

47% 47%

54%52% 52% 52%

49%

57%

51% 50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade 3 - 2016 Grade 4 - 2016 Grade 5 - 2016 Grade 6 - 2016 Grade 7 - 2016 Grade 8 - 2016 Grade 9 - 2016 Grade 10 - 2016

LAFAYETTE NEFEC WEIGHTED AVERAGE STATEWIDE AVERAGE

ELA Student Achievement – Grade 3

43

45%

61%

50%

55%

53%

54%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Grade 3 - 2015 Grade 3 - 2016

Grade 3 Comparison – 2015 and 2016


61%

13%

25%

39%

17%

6%

55%

19%

26%

29%

19%

7%

54%

22%24%

27%

19%

9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Percentage atLevel 3 and

Above

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

Grade 3 ELA - Student Achievement Distribution

LAFAYETTE Grade 3 NEFEC WEIGHTED AVERAGE Grade 3

STATEWIDE AVERAGE Grade 3



44

52%

38%

47%

50%

54%52%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 4 - 2015 Grade 4 - 2016



45%

38%

50% 50%

53% 52%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 3 - 2015 Grade 4 - 2016

Cohort Progression - Grade 3 (2015) to 4 (2016)


38%

28%

35%

22%

14%

2%

50%

26%25% 27%

18%

5%

52%

25%23%

26%

19%

7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above







45

43%

39%

44%

49%

52% 52%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 5 - 2015 Grade 5 - 2016



52%

39%

47%

49%

54%52%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 4 - 2015 Grade 5 - 2016



39%

20%

41%

12%

19%

8%

49%

22%

28%

27%

17%

6%

52%

22%

26% 26%

19%

7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above






46

51%

15%

34%

24%

23%

3%

49%

22%

29%

23%

20%

6%

52%

22%

26%

22% 21%

8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above




38%

51%

45% 49%

51% 52%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 6 - 2015 Grade 6 - 2016

Grade 6 Comparison - 2015 and 2016


43%

51%

44%

49%

52% 52%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 5 - 2015 Grade 6 - 2016





47

38% 37%

26%24%

9%

4%

45%

30%26%

22%

14%

8%

49%

27%24%

22%

17%

10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above





49%

38%

45% 45%

51%49%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

Grade 7 - 2015 Grade 7 - 2016



38% 38%

45% 45%

51%49%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 6 - 2015 Grade 7 - 2016





48

59%

16%

25%28%

23%

7%

53%

24% 23%

26%

17%

9%

57%

22% 21%

26%

19%

12%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above





58% 59%

50%

53%

55%

57%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 8 - 2015 Grade 8 - 2016



49%

59%

45%

53%

51%

57%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 7 - 2015 Grade 8 - 2016





49

58%

15%

27%

22% 22%

13%

47%

27%26%

22%18%

7%

51%

26%23%

21% 20%

10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above





51%

58%

45%47%

53%51%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 9 - 2015 Grade 9 - 2016



58% 58%

50%

47%

55%

51%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 8 - 2015 Grade 9 - 2016





50

58%

56%

47% 47%

51%50%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 10 - 2015 Grade 10 - 2016



51%

56%

45%

47%

53%

50%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 9 - 2015 Grade 10 - 2016



56%

12%

32%

24%27%

5%

47%

24%

29%

23%

18%

6%

50%

24%26%

22% 20%

8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above





51

MATH


2016 FSA Results - MATHStudent Achievement at Level 3 and Above

52

66%

61%

43%

78%

58%

39%

64%

60%

56%

51% 52%

43%

61%59%

55%

50%52%

48%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade 3 - 2016 Grade 4 - 2016 Grade 5 - 2016 Grade 6 - 2016 Grade 7 - 2016 Grade 8 - 2016



MATH Student Achievement – Grade 3

53

66% 66%

58%

64%

58%

61%

50%

60%

70%

Grade 3 - 2015 Grade 3 - 2016



66%

14%

19%

37%

22%

7%

64%

19%18%

30%

24%

10%

61%

21%18%

28%

22%

11%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above


Grade 3 Math - Student Achievement Distribution




54

63%

61%

54%

60%59%

59%

50%

60%

70%

Grade 4 - 2015 Grade 4 - 2016



66%

61%

58%60%

58% 59%

50%

60%

70%

Grade 3 - 2015 Grade 4 - 2016



61%

25%

14%

33%

19%

9%

60%

21%19%

29%

20%

11%

59%

24%

17%

26%

20%

12%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above






55

63%

43%

54%56%

59%

55%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Grade 4 - 2015 Grade 5 - 2016



69%

43%

54%

60%59%

59%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Grade 5 - 2015 Grade 5 - 2016



43%

22%

35%

29%

11%

3%

56%

20%

24%26%

21%

10%

55%

23% 22%24%

20%

12%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above






56

78%

6%

16%

32%34%

13%

51%

22%

27% 25%

18%

8%

50%

26%24% 23%

18%

8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above




56%

78%

48%51%

50% 50%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Grade 6 - 2015 Grade 6 - 2016



69%

78%

50%

51%55%

50%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Grade 5 - 2015 Grade 6 - 2016





57

58%

20%22%

27%25%

5%

52%

25% 23%

28%

15%

8%

52%

27%

21%

27%

17%

9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above




67%

58%

52% 52%

52% 52%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Grade 7 - 2015 Grade 7 - 2016



56%

58%

48%

52%

50%

52%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 6 - 2015 Grade 7 - 2016





58

39%

32%30%

36%

2%0%

43%

29%28%

28%

11%

5%

48%

28%

24%26%

12%10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above




21%

39%

40% 43%

45%48%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Grade 8 - 2015 Grade 8 - 2016



67%

39%

52%

43%52%

48%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Grade 7 - 2015 Grade 8 - 2016




59

ALGEBRA I Student Achievement – EOC

59%

67%

77%

89%

67%

64%

58%

62%

62%65%

48% 49%55% 58%

64%66%

56% 55%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Algebra 1 EOC - Student Achievement Trends


64%

24%

11%

39%

17%

9%

49%

34%

17%

31%

12%

7%

55%

32%

13%

29%

14%12%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above


Algebra 1 EOC - Distribution of Student Achievement



60

ALGEBRA II Student Achievement – EOC

46%

52%

33%

36%36%

40%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2015 2016

Algebra II EOC - Student Achievement Trends


52%

17%

30%

39%

10%

4%

36% 38%

26%26%

5% 5%

40% 39%

21%24%

7%9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above


Algebra II EOC - Student Achievement Distribution



61

GEOMETRY Student Achievement – EOC

59%

15%

26%

44%

12%

4%

51%

28%

21%

33%

11% 8%

51%

32%

18%

29%

11% 10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above


Geometry EOC - Distribution of Student Achievement

LAFAYETTE NEFEC WEIGHTED AVERAGE STATE TOTALS

45%

43%

79% 79%

59%

52%

62%61%

51% 51%

56%

64% 64%

55%

51%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Geometry EOC - Student Achievement Trends



62

SCIENCE


63

SCIENCE Student Achievement – Grade 5

46%

18%

35%

28%

14%

4%

48%

23%

29% 28%

11%9%

51%

23%26% 27%

13%11%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above


Grade 5 Science Achievement Distribution


48%

46%46%

48%

53%

51%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 5 - 2015 Grade 5 - 2016




64

SCIENCE Student Achievement – Grade 8

62%

12%

26%

35%

14% 14%

46%

22%

31%

23%

13%

11%

48%

21%

30%

23%

13% 12%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above


Grade 8 Science Achievement Distribution


50%

62%

43%

46%

49%

50%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Grade 8 - 2015 Grade 8 - 2016




65

BIOLOGY Student Achievement – EOC

73%

5%

22%

40%

17% 17%

62%

12%

26%

38%

11% 13%

64%

12%

24%

36%

12%16%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above


Biology EOC - Distribution of Student Achievement


58%

68%

75%

76%

73%

54%

66% 66%

63%

62%59%

67% 68%

65%

64%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Biology EOC - Student Achievement Trends



66

SOCIAL STUDIES


67

CIVICS Student Achievement – EOC

61%

19% 20%

29%

21%

11%

63%

17%

20%

29%

19%

14%

67%

15%18%

27%

20% 20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above


Civics EOC - Distribution of Student Achievement


78%

71%

61%

58%

60%

63%

61%

65%

67%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

2014 2015 2016

Civics EOC - Student Achievement Trends



68

US HISTORY Student Achievement – EOC

62%

66%

67%

70%

55%

65%

62%

64%

57%

65%66%

66%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2013 2014 2015 2016

US History EOC - Student Achievement Trends


70%

10%

20%

42%

18%

10%

64%

15%

21%

28%

20%

16%

66%

15%

19%

27%

20% 19%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Above


US History EOC - Distribution of Student Achievement



Documents

Lafayette County Data Profile 2017 Data Profile... · This version visualizes 2015/16 HCMS data. The purpose of the NEFEC Data Profile is to provide valuable data to aid in decision