Upload
buitruc
View
218
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
LABRAUNDA MARBLES
Conservation Report 2013
After last year’s conservation period, Lars Karlsson presented the project to the University of
Visby and four students from the Building conservation programme, Victoria Bly, Anna
Enberg, Adam Justin-Moll and Anna Plahn joined the project this year. Erika Andersson
participated for the third time, now as my assistant. Conservation was planned and carried
through as a two-week practice period. Traditional graphical and verbal documentation
methods were part of part of the training, which in its practical part consisted of cleaning,
consolidation, attachment of fragments, and preparation of stucco for infillings.
Conservation was concentrated to the North Stoa and the five Corinthian capitals, two of
which were treated with biocide last year. Another planned intervention concerned the column
drum at Andron B, treated with biocide last year. This season a few minor rearrangements of
pieces were made at the South Propylaea. The immediate reason was a broken architrave
inscription which was lifted and placed to the left of the entrance to the gateway. The first part
of the architrave was placed beside the inscribed part, and a fragment of the pediment placed
upon it. Further, the left side anta capital was placed on the inscribed anta block, thereby
approximately mirroring the arrangement on the right hand side with the anta capital
conserved in 2011. The inscribed fragments were conserved as an additional, unplanned
intervention. Another unplanned work regarded a small and frail fragment of one corner of an
Ionic anta capital found in the earth at the Temple Terrace. The fragment was cleaned and
consolidated.
Samples of marble obtained in 2011 and 2012 had been sent to CNR/ICVBC (Consiglio
Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la Conservazione e la Valorizzazione dei Beni Culturali)
in Florence. One sample of the common black surface deposit at the site, plus a sample of the
red surface deposit which covers the walls of the marble tomb had been removed for analyses
too. All results were available at the beginning of 2013.
The present report begins with Excursions followed by further notes on The marble at
Labraunda, Evaluation of conservation treatments 2010-2013, Evaluation of consolidation
tests, Survey 2013, and Conservation plan for next year. The conservation interventions begin
with a short introduction of The Corinthian capitals, after which follow all conservation
schedules, Material list and Bibliograpy.
2
Excursions
Fig.1, above, to the left: Excavations at Iasos. Fig.2, above to the right: Lunchtime.
Fig.3, below, to the left: Red cipollino marble. Fig. 4, to the right: The temple at Euromos.
After the annual visit to the police, we made the first excursion to the archaeological site of
Iasos, where Lars Karlsson explained the site, the functions of the buildings, styles and
marbles used, after which we had an exquisite lunch by the seaside followed by a visit to the
Italian archaeological team for coffee and talk. On the way back to Milas we took the Iasos-
Euromos road in search for ancient marble quarries – one of which we found near the road
were there were areas of the characteristic cipollino rosso, in antiquity known as marmo
iasense. We also found also minor blocks of a greenstone that may be cipollino verde.
At the modern road to Milas we turned in search of the ancient caves of white marble
recorded along the road by marble specialists, and in fact, we found these quarries too. The
trip continued to the nearby Euromos with its unique Doric temple which in the 1960s was
subject to a particular conservation performed by a famous Turkish conservator. Then we
visited the French excavation of the mausoleum at the site.
3
A second excursion Sunday 1st of September was made to Stratonikeia and Lagina. Three
colleagues from CNR in Florence, working with a marble project at the archaeological site of
Hierapolis in Phrygia participated. Lars showed and introduced the site to all of us and
discussions were for natural reasons with a specific attention to the marbles. The expedition
ended with a nice lunch in the oasis of the Pinarbaşi restaurant, after which we returned to
Milas.
Beside the excursions Jesper Blid Jesper took time to a much appreciated tour to the Roman
bath, the tetraconch and the West church, explaining the functions of the buildings and
constructions as well as their history of re-use. To Pontus Hellström, Olivier Henry and the
archaeological team we could always turn for information about specific objects or regarding
the history of the sanctuary.
Fig.5, above: The Bouleuterion at Stratonikeia.
Fig.6, below. Lunch at Pinarcik.
4
The Marble at Labraunda
What is the origin of the marble at Labraunda?
According to tradition, the marble comes from
quarries at Sodradaǧ, the mountain north-west of
Milas, mentioned already by Strabon.1 As there are
many antique marble quarries in the region, another
provenance cannot be excluded. Therefore, four
little pieces of marble were sent to CNR/ICVBC in
Florence for analyses. Two of these were collected
at Labraunda, one at an antique cave at Mount
Sodra, and the fourth obtained at a modern quarry
close to the site of Stratonikeia. The samples,
labeled Labraunda white, Labraunda grey, Sodra
white, and Stratonikeia, were analysed by different
analytical methods at CNR/ICVBC in Florence.2
According to analyses, samples Labraunda grey
and Sodra are very similar, but the composition of
Labraunda white is different. The sample indicated
as marble from Stratonikeia is quartzite, a
metamorphic rock, formed of quartz-rich sandstone.
Some years ago, two marble samples had been
obtained at Andron A and Andron B by Pontus
Hellström and Thomas Thieme. These were
examined by Norman Herz at the University of
Georgia with the stable isotope ratio analysis
method.3 The results of the isotope investigation
suggested that both samples most probably were of
marble from Herakleia on Latmos.
Sampling in 2012 was made at selected objects.
New samples were obtained of the investigated
blocks at Andron A and Andron B, and labeled A3
and C42 after the inventory numbers of the blocks. These represent the large-grained marble
type. Two samples were taken from the Corinthian capitals (CorCap1 and CorCap2) which
represent the very fine-grained marble. A fallen column of white marble with medium-sized
grains, possibly part of a Roman building, was sampled too (LabCol).
Fig. 7, above: Sample A3. Fig.8, below: Sample CorCap1.
1 Strabon XIV, 658.
2 A diffractometer for powder X’Pert Powder of the PANalytical correlated with software Highscore was used
for the interpretation of the diffractograms. The following operative conditions were used: anticathode tube for
Cu, alimentation of the tube 40KV, 30 mA, studied at angular interval 3<2ʋ<70. The petrographic thin sections
(thickness 30 micron) were observed under optic polarization microscope Axioscope of Zeiss at various
enlargements and with software dedicated to the handling and elaboration of images the microstructural
parameters, such as medium maximum and minimum granulometry, as well as the form of the contacts between
the crystals, were evaluated. 3 Analysed in Stable Isotope Labs of the University of Georgia, Department of Geology. The data were analyzed
by a least squares statistical package (Penţia, 1995) which compares the values to the Classical Marble Database
(Herz, 1987).
5
The results of the mineralogical composition showed, in brief, that Labraunda white was
Sodra bianco, Labraunda grigio, and Sodra were calcite marble with traces of dolomite,
fragments A3 and C42 are marble of pure calcite with medium large grains, CorCap1 and
CorCap2 are of a very fine-grained type of pure calcite marble, also LabCol is of pure calcite
with medium large grains but slightly different to A3 and C42. Sample Stratonikeia was
quartz.
To sum up, there is pure calcite marble at Labraunda, but also pieces of calcite/dolomite.
Some have fine grains, others have medium sized grains, and some have large grains. Further,
many blocks has a matrix of one specific grain-size but veins with clusters of large crystals.
There is, so far, no direct connection between the marbles at Labraunda and Sodradağ, but a
more systematic investigation may indicate otherwise.
How do these results correspond with results from systematic investigations of marble in the
area? Milas marble is frequently mentioned in current research. A geological map shows that
the so called Milas marble is found at various areas of the Menderes massive, at Heracleia,
Miletos, Euromos, Milas and Muğla, just to mention a few sites. There are local variations
between the marbles due to conditions during the metamorphous process. Research on ancient
marble in this area is plentiful and has been carried out with a variety of methods from the
basic ocular inspections and chemical tests, to advanced modern techniques.4
Monna and Pensabene mentions Milas-Mylasa marble, quarried 2 km south of Milas close to
the antique site of Euromos.5 Triassic marbles in the Muğla region from quarries at Çayboyu
(CM) and Kestanecik (KM), have been investigated by a Turkish team.6 The ÇM and KM
marbles are known as Muğla marble and Milas marble respectively, and both appear in a
variety of colours and patterns. The marbles are fine (0.45-0.55mm) to coarse grained (1-
4mm), and some contain Dolomite crystals. An extensive study of Turkish marbles, using a
set of methods for analyses, was made by Thomas Cramer.7 Further, there are four groups of
quarries on hills close to Heracleia at the south-east bank of Lake Bafa, by Anneliese
Peschlow Bindokat referred to as the Miletus and the Herakleia quarries.8 Recent research on
marbles at ancient sites of Asia Minor and the application of a set of methods of analyses has
led to even better ways of pin-point the provenance of ancient marbles, which can be
compared in a huge database.9
4 Methods applied are e.g. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Electron Spin Resonance spectroscopy (ESR), Scanning
Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS), Stable isotope analysis, and Chemical
analysis of inclusion fluids. 5 Monna and Pensabene 1977, 117.
6 Metin Bağci et alii 2010, 39-55.
7 Cramer 2004.
8 Attanasio 2003,180.
9 Prochaska, Attanasio 2012; Prochaska, Grillo 2012.
6
Fig.9, above: Antique quarry south of Lake Bafa, close to Herakleia.
Fig.10, below. The geological map of the Menderes massive (OKAY 2001), after Cramer 2004.
7
Evaluation of Conservation Materials and Treatments 2010-2013
Conservation year 2010
It was decided to prepare a plan for conservation and maintenance within the archaeological
project in 2010. A survey was made and two cleaning/consolidation tests were done.
A severely disintegrating Ionic capital was treated with biocide (GrönFri), cleaned with a
natural pine-soap (Grön såpa) and consolidated with Bindzil CC30, a water based silica which
had been successfully used in similar circumstances at Capri. The second object, a fallen
column fragmented in several parts of which some had completely collapsed into loose
marble crystals, was partially consolidated at one end. Biocide treatment was performed on
objects selected for next year’s conservation.
Conservation year 2011
Two anta capitals, one Ionic capital and 6 inscribed anta blocks were conserved. Cleaning was
made with the same materials as previously used, and consolidation performed with Bindzil
CC30 in 50% water.
Conservation year 2012
Ten inscribed blocks and one column were cleaned and consolidated, as described in the
report. Four capitals and one column were prepared with biocide for next year’s campaign.
Samples of red and black surface deposits were removed for laboratory analyses.
Observations 2013
Ocular inspection of the conserved pieces revealed that they all have a hard surface, meaning
no crystals are falling. All look clean and white seen from a distance. At closer inspection, the
large fragments conserved last year at Andron A still have a dotty surface, while the rest are
more uniformly white. If required, another application of diammonium phosphate next year
may be effective at the dotty pieces.
The test slab
A large marble slab was prepared for consolidation tests. It needs to be pointed out that the
tests were made in August when temperature was around 40º Celcius during day. The
products tested were Bindzil CC301, Bindzil CC401, Diammonium phosphate and
Casein/lime. The intention was to test calcium oxalate too, but the product was not available
at the time. The slab was divided into 20 areas, 4 for each of the 5 products. All areas at the
top were allowed to dry rapidly and all areas al the lower part were covered by wet tissue
paper before the plastic sheet was laid over the stone.
All consolidation materials reacted positively at the lower area, where the consolidation
process was slow. At the top, both Bindzil products formed films when undiluted, and diluted
there was a thin, almost ignorable film. But, as mentioned above, no film or discoloration
appeared when the drying process was slow. Diammonium phosphate turned out to have
cleaning properties, since the wet tissue that covered the treated areas became pink. The
product thereby reduced the dotty effect created by removed lichens.
On the first day at the site in 2012, calcium oxalate was applied on the preselected areas
according to the same principles as before. The surfaces received a white hue. After a few
days the whiteness diminished, and after three weeks it was hardly notable. It has to be noted
that this substance was applied on the most decayed and uneven area of the slab.
8
At inspection in august 2013, the dotty impression on the slab was very much reduced on all
test areas, and those treated with diammonium phosphate were clean and white. The film at
the test areas with un-diluted Bindzil was gone. All areas were in good condition and the
marks of untreated bands and areas quite distinct. So, which consolidation substance is the
better one in the present environment? Diammonium phosphate has, so far turned out to be
the better alternative.
Figs 11-13.
At the top: 2011. The last four rectangles at the right side were not used, since the material intended for those
areas, calcium oxalate, was not available. The small undivided area at the right side was left untreated.
In the middle: 2012. The last four areas recently treated with calcium oxalate.
Below: 2013. The slab in September 2013.
9
Survey 2013 Green = conserved.
South Propylaea
1. Anta block with inscription (61A and 61B), inv. K 73, at the west side of the entrance, decision of Roman officials regarding freedom from annoyance of the inhabitants of the sacred land. Biocide treatment 2013.
2. Anta capital, inv. K 80, with egg-and dart decoration at the top, followed by a palmetto and lotus frieze, a Lesbian molding and a
bead-and reel list. Conserved 2011. 3. Column at the end of the passage at the east side. Badly damaged at the lower part, on a broken base.
4. Column standing at the end of the passage at the west side.
5. Anta capital, S-E anta, moved to the S-E side of the gateway, placed on inv. K73. Biocide treatment 2013. 6. Inscription (61A and 61B), inv. K 19, decision of Roman officials regarding freedom from annoyance of the inhabitants of the
sacred land. 7. Pediment of the Southeast architrave, inv.? Placed upon architrave fragment K4. Biocide treatment 2013.
8. Architrave fragment, inv. K4. Biocide treatment 2013.
9. Architrave fragment with dedication of the gateway, inv. K81. The fragment, broken into two pieces, was lifted from the ground and is now placed beside K4. Conserved 2013.
Andron B 1 Anta capital, inv. C84, decorated with egg-and-dart, lotus-and palmetto frieze, Lesbian cymatium and bead-and-reel list, placed
on the terrace. The capital has flaking areas at the top, indicating there will be future material losses. These parts need to be
secured. Conserved 2011.
2 Inscription I. Labraunda 6, inv. C 39, on the terrace. Conserved 2011.
3 Inscription I. Labraunda 5, inv. C 76, placed on the terrace. Conserved 2011.
4 Inscription I. Labraunda 5, inv. C 78, letter of Philip of Macedon to Mylasa. Conserved 2011. 5 Inscription I. Labraunda 6B, inv. C 38, placed on the terrace. Conserved 2011.
6 Inscription I. Labraunda 14, consisting of 7 blocks lined up on the terrace, inv. C11, C10a, C10b, C13, C 12, C165, C42. Biocide
treatment 2011. Conserved 2012. 7 Ionic capital, inv. C80, standing in front of Andron B. Conserved 2011.
8 Column, inv. C 3, one of a pair at the entrance to the building, placed towards north. Biocide treatment 2012. Conserved 2013.
9 Column, inv. C 44, at the entrance to the building, placed towards south. Biocide treatment 2013. 10 Anta block, inv. C 82, on which inv.C 84 is standing. Conserved 2011.
11 Inscription I. Labraunda 5, inv. C 77, placed on the terrace. Conserved 2011.
12 Inscription I. Labraunda 7, inv. C 40, placed on the terrace. Conserved 2011.
Andron A
1 Column, inv. A 125, one of a pair standing at Andron A, placed towards south. 2 Column, inv. A 13, second of a pair at Andron A, on the ground towards north.
3 Ionic capital, inv A 104. Conserved 2010.
4 Inscription I. Labraunda 4, inv. A 150, placed in the corner close to no 5. Conserved 2012. 5 Inscription I. Labraunda 15 consisting of 3 large blocks, inv. A5, A3, A2, placed in front of the north column. Conserved 2012.
Oikoi 1 Inscription I. Labraunda 21, inv. NA 2, placed on a row of frieze blocks standing outside the building. Biocide treatment 2013.
Temple of Zeus 1 Column at the north side. The column is vertically broken into two pieces. Flaking areas.
2 Column drum at the north side. Damaged.
3 Column drum, north-westcorner. Damaged. Biocide treatment 2013. 4 Ionic corner capital, northwest corner, placed on Biocide treatment 2013.
5 Base and block at the N-E corner of the stylobate. Damaged.
6 Column drum at south side, split. 7 Column drum at south side, split.
8 Reconstruction, 3 blocks. (Top block with lesbian cymatium, dentils, egg-and-dart, and bead and reel decoration). Strange crust
on the Lesbian cyma. Biocide treatment 2013.
Temple terrace
1 Architrave fragment with decoration. Cleaned for documentation 2012.
North Stoa
1. Capital B152, treated with biocide 2012. Conserved 2013.. 2. Capital B147, treated with biocide 2012. Conserved 2013.
3. Capital B95. Conserved 2013.
4. Capital B146. Conserved 2013. 5. Capital B141. Conserved 2013.
6. Entablement, with inscriptions (7 plus 9 decorated and/or inscribed blocks).
Exedra
1. Stele with inscription, inv. 118/Y30.
10
Conservation plan for 2014
Interventions have, so far, been concentrated to Andron B terrace, Andron A, and North Stoa
and South Propylaea. The plan for next year is to continue to work at the South Propylaea, by
conserving the left hand side of the architrave treated this year, and the pediment placed upon
it, as well as the left side inscribed anta block and the capital placed on top. The second
column drum at Andron B will be treated too, completing the interventions planned at the
andron. Further, one inscription placed at the terrace between the oikoi and the Temple of
Zeus, will be conserved and also the Ionic corner capital of the temple as well as the column
drum on which it stands. Finally, if circumstances are favorable, the plan is to conserve the
reconstruction of Ionic decoration which is constituted of three blocks placed upon each other.
The objects mentioned above were treated with biocide on the last day at the site.
In order to understand the biological development on marble and to find reasonale ways of
eliminating such growth, some analyses were made at CNR/ICVBC in Florence. The studies
were made on the samples collected for the analyses of the marble type, which all presented
surface deposits. Two samples, black biological growth and red deposits in the marble tomb,
had been removed explicitly for the analysis of surface deposits.
Analyses show that the biodiversity is represented by various types of lichens and one type of
moss. Various phototrophic microorganisms were identified. The lichens were mainly of the
crust type but the foliose type was noted as well. Phototropic microorganisms are the most
abundant, being present in all samples. These are mainly cyanobacteria and green alga, which
can associate with a fungus and form lichen, that is, a new organism. Some of the
cyanobacteria that colonize the stone give it a black hue due to their development on and
inside the stone, penetrating between grains and in fissures.
Fig.14, above: South Proylaea. To the left anta block and anta capital treated to be conserved 2014.
Fig.15, below: Temple of Zeus, the reconstruction, in need of conservation.
12
The Corinthian Capitals
The North Stoa, excavated between 1948 and
1953, is situated north-east of the Temple of Zeus.
An inscription informs that at the end of his
priesthood Poleites, by own means, had the
building erected and decorated with marble. The
building which is dated to between AD 102 and
114, belongs to the Roman period at Labraunda.10
Five Corinthian capitals of the building are
preserved; B95, B146, B141, B147, and B152. At
present the capitals are placed along the north side
of the Stoa. Number 1, seen from the Temple of
Zeus, has the inventory number B152, the second
is B147, the third is B95, the fourth is B146 and
the fifth is B141, which lay fallen and damaged
on the ground behind the northern wall, but was
lifted and placed as the last capital in the row.
One of the capitals, B95, was thoroughly studied,
measured, and drawn by Liljenstolpe and von
Schmalensee.11
The drawings were very useful for
us as models for the simplified drawings we need
for the documentation of damages on the capitals
as they are preserved today. Being more or less
severely damaged none of the capitals has
maintained its original measures.
According to Liljenstolpe, the capitals have
foliage of the eastern acanthus type, which is
different from contemporary capitals of Urban Rome. The Labraunda capitals are suggested to
be of the Ephesian type and maybe cut by Ephesian sculptors. The marble of which the
capitals are cut is very fine-grained and quite different from the main part of the marble at the
site. Since they are of the Roman period, the question was if they were made of local or
imported marble. Whether the marble was imported from far away or from some other quarry
in Caria or along the Anatolian coast, might be indicated by analyses. Therefore, samples
were obtained from capitals 1 and 2, and sent to CNR/ICVBC for analyses.
The results confirm that the marble is different from the other pieces sampled so far. It is a
pure calcite marble with fine grains and it has a structure which is different from the
characteristic large-grained marble used at earlier buildings at the site (see The Marble at
Labraunda).
Each student selected one of the capitals, and was, under supervision, responsible for the
different conservation interventions, documentation during work, and descriptions in the
following schedules.
Fig.17, conservation of capitals at the North stoa.
10
Liljenstolpe and von Schmalensee 1996. 11
Height 0.47, the diagonal of the abacus 0.82, the width of the side 0.58.
14
Corinthian Capital 1 Inv. B 152
Location: The capital is located on a block in the North Stoa
Measures, cm: height: 51, diameter max: 75.5, circumference max: 205.
Marble: White marble, fine grained crystals.
Period: Roman, 102-114 AD.
Bibliography: Liljenstolpe and von Schmalensee, 1996.
Photos and drawing: Erika Andersson.
Description
The capital is the first one in a row of five, located in the North
Stoa. It is decorated with acanthus leaves on all sides. Only one
volute, located in the south west corner, remains complete. The
south east corner of the capital is broken.
State of preservation
Three of the capital's volutes are missing. It is partially covered
with mosses and lichens, the latter are of black, brown and white
color. The biological growth seems to be somewhat more
concentrated to the north and south sides. A large part of the
surface is covered with soil which makes the marble look dark.
The top side appears to be relatively stable, but the marble is
sugaring towards the edges. There is a large crack close to the
west top edge and fissures on the remaining volute. The chiseled
marble on the sides are very unstable, with crystals sugaring and
several loose fragments. The acanthus leaves decoration show
severe material loss, especially on the tops where white marble is
visible at the fractures.
Conservation treatments
A biocide treatment (GrönFri) was performed in August 2012. A year later, there seemed to be
none or very little new biological growth. Large mosses were removed with a scalpel and
loose dirt was removed from the surface using a soft brush. A second biocide treatment was
performed (GrönFri 20% solution in water) and left on during the night. The capital was then
rinsed with water. Cleaning was done on all sides with water and natural soap (Grönsåpa)
using brushes of different sizes. Mosses and lichens were removed with scalpel.
A consolidation treatment was performed using diammonium phosphate (25 g/ 1 l water).
After application, the capital was covered with wet tissue paper and plastic, which was left on
for two nights. Two acanthus leave fragments, one on the south side and one on the west, were
loosely attached to the object and had fallen off during the conservation treatments. These
were reattached using marble adhesive (AkFix). The large crack close to the top west side was
fixed with an infilling consisting of slaked lime and crushed marble crystals. Small infillings
were also carried out where the fragments had been glued on. The infillings were retouched
with water colors.
The conservation was carried out by Erika Andersson under supervision by A. Freccero.
Analyses:
The marble was analyzed at CNR/ICVBC (CorCap 1).
Biological observations, CNR/ICVBC (CorCap 1).
Fig.18. Before conservation.
Figs 19-20: After conservation.
16
Corinthian Capital 2
Inv. B 147
Location: North Stoa.
Measures in cm: Height: 48, diameter max: 73, circumference max: 205.
Marble: White marble with fine grains (0.05-0.6mm).
Period: Roman, 102-114 AD.
Bibliography: Liljenstolpe and von Schmalensee, 1996.
Photos and drawing: Anna Plahn.
Description
The capital is number two of five Corinthian capitals placed at the
North Stoa. Originally the capital was decorated with acanthus
leaves and volutes in the four corners.
State of preservation
The capital’s sides are in various conditions and the problems vary
according to each side’s geographical direction. The west-south
side has been exposed by the sun and is whiter and cleaner and
there are practically no mosses or lichens. The east and the north
sides have a lot of black surface deposits and a lot of mosses.
Mutually for these two sides is sugaring and small fissures which
occur behind the black crusts; these sides are very fragile and
crystals are falling at touch. The west side is in better condition
than the north and east but also in a state of decay. The acanthus
leaves on all sides are in different states of preservation. The top
surface presents all kinds of lichens and mosses and it has also a
lot of cavities covered with mosses and dirt. Three volutes are
missing and the fourth, on the north-east side, is only half.
Conservation treatments
A biocide treatment (GrönFri) was performed in 2012. In August 2013 the main part of the
lichens and the mosses were dry and dead. The surfaces were dry-cleaned with scalpel and
soft brushes and after that treated with biocide a second time. The following day, the capital
was cleaned with water and a soft brush and then it was cleaned with soap-water. A scalpel
and toothbrush was used for removal of lichens and mosses. The capital was treated a third
time with biocide on the most problematic parts, mainly on the north side. After cleaning with
spring water and toothbrush one last time, the capital was consolidated with diammonium
phosphate (25 gr in one liter spring water). The application was made with brush and the
spring water was sprayed on the tissue paper. Finally the stone was covered in plastic sheets
which were left on the capital for ca 36 hours. Reattachment of a fragment that had fallen off
during cleaning was done with Akfix G400 Granite and Marble Adhesive. The fissures were
filled in with slaked lime mixed with crushed marble and finally retouched with aquarelle.
The conservation was carried out by Anna Plahn under supervision by A. Freccero and E.
Andersson.
Analyses
The marble was analyzed at CNR/ICVBC (Corcap 2).
Biological observations, CNR/ICVBC (Corcap 2).
Fig.22, SE side and 23, NW side: before conservation. Fig.24, S side and 25, W side: after conservation.
18
Corinthian Capital 3 Inv. B 95
Location: North Stoa.
Measures in cm: Height: 46, maximum diameter: 58, maximum
circumference: 180.
Marble: White fine grained marble.
Period: Roman, 102-114 AD.
Photos and drawing: Victoria Bly.
Bibliography: Liljenstolpe and von Schmalensee 1996.
Description
Corinthian capital, decorated with acanthus leaves on the four
sides, flowers at the top, and volutes in the corners. The
material is white marble with fine grains (0,05-0,6 mm).
State of preservation
The side facing south is the better preserved. The volute in
the south-west corner is the only one that remains complete.
The upper south-east corner was broken off the capital due to
a fall after the picture was taken in autumn 2012. The fragment was found on the site of the
capital. The flower on top of the south side is the best preserved of the four, but is not
complete due to damage and decay. The amount of lichens and mosses on this side of the
capital is also minor than the other ones. The top flower on the east side does not remain since
a big piece has fallen off the capital. This damage is obviously due to a different incident than
the one mentioned above, since it has more lichens and mosses than the above mentioned
corner where the fallen volute was situated. The east side is the one side with the highest
amount of large lichens and mosses and also dirt. There are also some smaller fissures, and
one very large horizontal fracture reaches along the whole east side. The west and north sides
are similar regarding the amount of damage and decay. Lichens and mosses are mostly small,
but the sugaring is much more progressed than on the other sides. The marble is most porous
from the west-north corner and along the whole north side. There is also a large horizontal
fracture on the north side, but it does not seem to be connected to the fracture on the east side.
Conservation was made by Victoria Bly under supervision by A. Freccero and E. Andersson.
Conservation treatments
• Removal of mosses with a scalpel.
• Biocide treatment (GrönFri).
▪ Removal of lichens and remaining mosses with scalpel, brushes, soap and water.
• Second biocide treatment.
• Continued removal of lichens, dirt and mosses. Using the same methods.
• Treatment with diammonium phosphate, covered with wet paper tissue and
plastic until the paper had dried completely.
• Reattachment of minor fragments, using Akfix G400 marble adhesive.
• Reattachment of the large fragment by drilling one hole in the fragment and one
in the capital, attaching a pin of stainless steel, and the same glue as mentioned above.
• Infillings in fissures and fractures using slaked lime and crushed marble.
• Retouching the infillings with aquarelle paint.
Fig.27, before conservation. Fig.28. Detail, during conservation.
20
Corinthian Capital 4
Inv. B 146
Location: North Stoa.
Measures, cm: height: 47, diameter max: 69, circumference max: 202.
Marble: Fine-grained white marble.
Period: Roman, 102-114 AD.
Bibliography: Liljenstolpe and von Schmalensee 1996; Hellström 2007,
125-147.
Photos and drawing: Adam Justin Moll.
Description
Corinthian capital which originally was decorated with
volutes in the corners, flowers between the volutes, and
acanthus leaves on the lower part of the capital. According to
Liljestolpe and von Schmalensee the capital is dated to 102-
114 A.D., during the reign of Emperor Trajan, and was a part
of the North Stoa which was erected by the priest Poleites.
State of preservation
All sides of the capital are worn and damaged. Of the four top corners, only the north-western
is preserved but the volute’s shape has withered away. Acanthus leaves with fairly well
preserved forms can be found on the northern side of the capital, and partially on the eastern
side. The chiselled forms on the capital are fragile and during the conservation treatment
seven small fragments of marble, roughly between 5x5 and 10x10 mm, fell off. The top side
of the capital seems to be more stable than the finely chiselled sides. The surface is covered
with black, white, and brown lichens, and mosses all around. The top has no mosses but
plenty of lichens. The southern side of the capital has more mosses and lichens than the other
sides, and is much more damaged.
Conservation treatments
Mosses and some lichens were removed with a scalpel. The capital was then treated with
biocide (1/4 Grön-Fri and 3/4 spring water). A day after the capital was treated with biocide,
the surface was cleaned with spring water. Further cleaning with soap water (Grönsåpa) and a
toothbrush was then carried out. During this treatment remaining mosses and lichens were
removed with a scalpel. When the capital was free of mosses and lichens it was consolidated
with diammonium phosphate (25 gr in one litre spring water) which was applied with a brush,
packed in with wet tissue paper, and enclosed with a black plastic bin bag. The consolidation
was left to soak in for approximately 40 hours.
The seven fragments that had fallen off during the treatments were reattached with adhesive
stone glue. Small cracks behind three of the fragments were in-filled with slaked lime and
crushed marble, which was later retouched with water colour.
Drawings, showing missing elements of the ornamentation of the capital, have been made,
along with photo documentation before, during, and after the conservation treatments.
The conservation was carried out by Adam Justin-Moll under supervision by Agneta Freccero
and Erika Andersson.
Fig.30. Before conservation. Fig 31. After conservation.
22
Corinthian Capital 5 Inv. B 141
Location: North Stoa.
Measures, in cm: Hight: 47, width at the top: 149, width at the bottom: 101.
Marble: Homogeneous white marble with fine grains.
Period: Roman, 102-114 AD.
Bibliography: Liljenstolpe & von Schmalensee 1996. Hellström 2007, p. 125-147.
Photos: A . Freccero. Drawing: Anna Enberg.
Description
The Corinthian capital, dated to the reign of Trajan, was lifted from the
ground between the architrave and the stylobate of the stoa in
September 2012, where it had ended up at some point after it was
excavated. The excavation took place between 1948 and 1953.
State of preservation
The part of the capital that had been lying down towards the ground is
in a considerably better condition than the rest of the piece, the
carvings are more intact and there are practically no mosses or lichens
on the white marble. The other sides, as well as the top surface, are
covered with dirt and mosses; lichens are almost nonexistent. All
corner volutes are missing as well as the flowers originally situated
between them at the top of the capital. On one side of the capital there
are no longer any signs of original carvings, as all of these have been
worn down. On the other sides there are several acanthus leaves in different states of
preservation. The marble is partially fragile, some small pieces fall off at touch, and there is
also one major crack on one of the corners. The top surface is severely eroded. On the
drawing of the capital from above the poor state of preservation is clearly demonstrated.
Conservation treatments
After removing large mosses the capital was treated with biocide on august 27 with a mix of
¼ biocide and ¾ water on the clean side, and ½ biocide and ½ water on the dirty surfaces. The
next day the capital was cleaned with toothbrush and water. After this, cleaning was made
with soap water, using toothbrush and scalpel for the removal of dirt and mosses. To clean the
entire piece in this manner took two days. On August 31 diammonium phosphate (25 gr in one
litre spring water) was applied to the entire surface and the capital was covered with a layer of
damp paper and packed in with plastic. On September 2 the plastic and paper were removed,
and the initial results of the consolidation could be seen on the surface, above all it was
evident that the marble had hardened and was less fragile. Drawings were made of all the
sides of the capital in which the missing elements in the ornamentation were marked out. The
last step was the reattachment of two fragments that had fallen off during cleaning; these were
glued with adhesive stone glue. The small crevices that remained after the reattachment were
filled in with a mix of slaked lime and finely crushed marble. The large fissure on the north
side was also filled in, using the same mix of lime and marble. Finally the fillings were
colored with watercolors so that they would show as little as possible. The conservation was
carried out by Anna Enberg under supervision by Agneta Freccero and Erika Andersson.
Fig.33 and fig. 34: Before conservation. Fig.35: After conservation.
24
Column drum Inv. C 3
Location: Andron B.
Measures in m: Column drum: Height 0.97, circumference at the middle
2.51. Base: Height 0.22, circumference at the bottom 3.55.
Marble: White marble with large grains.
Period: Hecatomnid, Maussollos (377-353/2 BC).
Bibliography: Pontus Hellström and Thomas Thieme, “Andronerna”,
Medelhavsmuseets Bulletin 1982?
Photos: A. Freccero.
Description
Column drum C 3 was found fallen on the ground in front of
the base which was still in situ at excavation in and therefore
it did not receive any inventory number.
The column belongs to the Ionic order and is, according to
Pontus Hellström, typical of the Hecatomnid period.
State of preservation
The column is badly damaged at the top where it has some
crevices, two of which need to be filled. Most of the column
and base were covered with mosses and lichens. At the top
the lichens were mainly large ones of the crustaceous type,
while parts facing the north and west mainly presented the
characteristic cyanobacteria which give a black hue to the
stone. A few areas were mainly dirty of soil, except for a
circular area facing south at which there was almost no
biological growth. All external areas of the fluting were in a
bad state of preservation, and most were losing crystals at
touch. The base was very decayed at the concave areas while
the convex ones were in a considerably better condition.
Conservation treatments
Biocide treatment with GrönFri was performed in September 2012. In August 2013 loose
deposits were removed with a scalpel and a brush, followed by a second application of
GrönFri. At the beginning of September the column was cleaned with soap-water and brushes.
Lichens, mosses and deposits of soil were removed with scalpels. After cleaning it was
consolidated with diammonium phosphate covered with wet tissue paper and plastic sheets.
After 2 days the covers were removed. During the last two working-days the base was cleaned
too, after which it was treated with biocide.
Conservation was performed as teamwork by all persons in the conservation group.
Analyses
Analyses of biological development were made at CNR/ICVBC. A sample of black surface
deposit was identified as cyanobacteria, which give a black hue to the marble because they
develop on and inside the stone.
Fig.37. The column drum before conservation.
Fig.38. The column drum during conservation.
25
Fragment of anta capital Inv. M2013-1
Location: The Temple Terrace, building M.
Measures in cm: height: 14, diameter max: 25, circumference max: 65
(around the top)
Marble: White marble.
Period: Probably Roman, early 2nd
century AD.
Bibliography: Unpublished.
Photos: A. Freccero. Drawing: Anna Plahn.
Description
Fragment of an Ionian anta capital,
State of preservation
The fragment, which was found in the earth during excavation,
was very frail and crystals fell at touch.
Conservation treatments
It was decided to lightly wipe off the loose soil and give the marble a light cleaning with
water and a very soft brush, and then proceed with consolidation to gain a material stability
that permitted further examination. After approximately 40 hours the anta capital was still
frail. A drawing was made in scale 1:5 and it was decided to consolidate it a second time.
The conservation was carried out by Anna Plahn under supervision by Agneta Freccero and
Erika Andersson.
Figs.39, 40, above: The fragment after cleaning and consolidation.
Fig.41, below. Anta capital fragment, inv. M2013-1.
26
Architrave fragment with inscription Inv. K 81
Location: South Propylaea, left side of the gateway.
Measures in m: Height: 0.49 m, thickness 0.54 m, length 1.65 m.
Marble: White marble.
Period: Hekatomnid, Idrieus (351-344 BC).
Bibliography: Crampa 1972, 15-17, pl. 3 fig. 18;
Jeppesen 1955, 24-27; Westholm 1963, 96-98, 117.
Photos: A. Freccero. Drawing: Anna Enberg.
Description
The block which was found in the excavation of 1949, was part of the architrave of the South
Propylaea. Originally the architrave, constructed of three blocks, was 10.35 m long. The left
side block was broken in two parts K4 (0.81 m) without inscription and K 81 (1.65 m) on
which the dedication of the gateway begins.
The front face is divided in two fasciae, the upper which carries the inscription, projects over
the lower with 1.5 cm. The face is crowned with egg-and tongue above bead-and-reel.
12 letters were inscribed on block K 81:
ΙΔΡΙΕΥΣ ΕΚΑTO
An early photograph presented in Crampa’s publication shows an antique repair just below the
central letters IEYΣ.
State of preservation
The block, which at some time fell on the ground, is broken into two parts at the area of the
antique repair. A portion of the block and part of the inscription is missing. The top of the
letter Ρ is gone as well as the rest of Idreus's name, that is the letters ΙΕΥΣ. The first letter in
the name Hekatomnos, namely the letter Ε, is also missing. The following letter Κ is only
partly preserved but the last letters ΑTO are still in their place. The inscribed side which has
been buried in the ground is dirty with soil but in a good condition, contrary to the uncovered
sides which are stained and present biological growth, mainly lichens. The preserved and
partly preserved letters are distinct since they have not been worn down. The damage done to
the piece has rather occurred due to the mentioned fall, which has resulted in a clean break.
The missing part of the inscription as well as the piece that made up the antique repair are
unfortunately missing, they could possibly be retrieved from somewhere in front of the
propylon, on the left side, where our fragment was found. The ornamentation on top of the
architrave is partly intact but the condition of the marble is fragile and crystals fall of at touch,
this is also the case with all the other top edges.
Conservation treatments
The conservation of this fragment has been confined to the front, top and right side surfaces
since these are the ones that are easily visible for the visitor. First the named surfaces were
cleaned with soap water and a soft brush on September 2, after which the top was treated with
biocide. On September 3 the lichens and mosses were mechanically removed using toothbrush
and scalpel, this after soaking the marble with soap water. The next day the fragment was
consolidated with diammonium phosphate (25 gr in one liter spring water) and the surfaces
were covered with a layer of damp paper and packed in with plastic.
Fig. 42: before conservation.
27
When the paper and plastic were removed one could detect as an immediate result that the
stone was cleaner and harder than before. A quick search for the missing fragments was
carried out before departure from Labranda. A big piece that was originally part of K 81 was
retrieved from between the stones lying on top of the staircase of the propylon. Several other
small fragments that might also be part of K 81 were found in the same place. All these
fragments were collected and placed right behind our inscription. During next year’s
campaign the conservation work on K 81 is planned to be continued. Hopefully more
fragments can be found and possibly the inscription could be partly reassembled to look more
like it did in its original state.
The conservation was made by Anna Enberg under supervision by A. Freccero and E.
Andersson.
Fig.43, above: Architrave fragments K4 and K 81.
Fig.44, below: Architrave fragment, inv. K 81.
28
List of Conservation Materials
Cleaning and biocide treatments Grön såpa, natural saponified pine-oil soap
Grön Fri, biocide solved in water, containing 10% kvartära ammoniumföreningar
Natural Labraunda spring water
Consolidation Diammonium Phosphate , 25 gr in 1 l water.
Infillings and retouches Lime
Marble, crushed
Rembrandt Artist’s water colour (aquarelle paint)
Marble Glue AkFix G400, Granite and Marble adhesive.
Material Used for Tests Bindzil CC301, colloidal silica, solved in water, plus 2-4% etanol. PH 5-9.
Bindzil CC401, colloidal silica, solved in water, plus 2-4% etanol. PH 5-9.
Casein/limewater. Casein powder dissolved in water to which lime water was added.
Diammonium phosphate (NH4)2(HPO4), consists of ammonium cations and phosphate anion. Crystalline powder
soluble in water. PH 7.8-8.5 (5%)
Calcium oxalate 15% in spring water
Distilled water
Bibliography Attanasio 2003 Donato Attanasio, Ancient White Marbles. Analysis and Identification by
Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Roma 2003.
Bağci et alii 2010 Metin Bağci, Yaşar Kibici, Ahmet Yildiz, Ömer Tezcan Akinci “ Petrographical
and geochemical investigation of the Triassic marbles associated with Menderes
massif metamorphics, Kavaklidere, Muğla, SW Turkey”, in Journal of
Geochemical Exploration 107 (2010) 39-55
Cramer 2004 Thomas Cramer, Multivariate Herkunftsanalyse von Marmor auf petrografischer
und geochemischer Basis, Berlin 2004.
Crampa 1969 Jonas Crampa “Labraunda. Swedish Excavations and Research vol III, part I: 1-
12 The Greek Inscriptions (period of Olympichos)”, in Skrifter utgivna av
Svenska Institutet i Athen, 4, V, III.1, Lund 1969.
Crampa 1972 Jonas Crampa “Labraunda, Swedish Excavations and Research vol III, part II:
13-133. The Greek Inscriptions” in Skrifter utgivna av Svenska Institutet i
Athen, 4, V, III.2, Stockholm 1972.
Hellström 2007 Pontus Hellström, Labraunda. Zeus Labraundos helgedom i Karien. En
beskrivning av de svenska utgrävningarna, Istanbul 2007.
Liljenstolpe 1996 Peter Liljenstolpe and Patric von Schmalensee “The Roman Stoa of Poleites at
Labraynda”, in Opuscula Atheniensia XXI:8, 1996.
Monna, Pensabene 1997 D. Monna and Patrizio Pensabene, Marmi dell’Asia Minore, Roma 1997.
Prochaska, Attanasio 2012 W. Prochaska, D. Attanasio,”Tracing the origin of marbles by inclusion fluid
chemestry”, in Interdisciplinary studies on Ancient Stone, Tarragona 2012, 230-
237.
Prochasca, Grillo 2012 W. Prochasca, S.M. Grillo, “The marble quarries of the metropolis of Ephesos
and some examples of the use for marbles in Ephesian architecture and
sculpting”, in Interdisciplinary studies on Ancient Stone, Tarragona 2012, 584-
591.