20
Electro-Optic Search for Threshold Divergence of the CDW Diffusion Constant in Blue Bronze (K 0.3 MoO 3 ) L. Ladino, J.W. Brill, University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat, D. Dominko, E. Bittle Samples from R.E. Thorne Helpful discussions with O. Narayan Support from U.S. National Science Foundation

L. Ladino, J.W. Brill, University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

  • Upload
    meris

  • View
    42

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Electro-Optic Search for Threshold Divergence of the CDW Diffusion Constant in Blue Bronze (K 0.3 MoO 3 ). L. Ladino, J.W. Brill, University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat, D. Dominko, E. Bittle Samples from R.E. Thorne Helpful discussions with O. Narayan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

Electro-Optic Search for Threshold Divergence of the CDW Diffusion Constant

in Blue Bronze (K0.3MoO3)

L. Ladino, J.W. Brill, University of Kentucky

Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

D. Dominko, E. Bittle

Samples from R.E. Thorne

Helpful discussions with O. Narayan

Support from U.S. National Science Foundation

Page 2: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

The infrared transmission () and reflectance (R) (for h < 2) of blue bronze vary with position and voltage in the CDW state.

T = 80 K, = 820 cm-1

V (mV)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Res

ista

nce

(k

)

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45R0VT

Von

x=0 (adjacent to current contact)

VT: threshold for non-Ohmic dc current, depinning at contacts, phase-slip

Von: onset of CDW polarization (elastic strain), depinning in bulk:

Phase-slip voltage Vps ~ VT - Von

Page 3: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

T = 80 K, = 820 cm-1

+V -V

CDW: n = n0 + n1cos(Qx+φ); polarization (strain) ≡ 1/Q ∂φ/∂x

Extra strains near current contacts when CDW slides

Changes in IR due to: a) changes in density of quasiparticles screening CDW strain and b) changes in phonons in strained CDW:

R/R ∂φ/∂x

Strain varies linearly with position if no sliding

Page 4: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

Solitons & Phase Dislocations

The strain in the CDW phase may occur through soliton-like 2-changes. These line up on neighboring chains to form extended defects (e.g.phase dislocation lines/loops).

Phase-slip occurs by the growth of dislocation loops by climb across the crystal cross-section.

? Does changing polarization require 1) glide of solitons/dislocations along the conducting chains or 2) smooth, gradual changes in phase?

Page 5: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

Electro-Reflectance:

R = R(V+) – R(V-)

Electro-Transmittance:

= (V+) – (V-)

IR Microscope

Use the electro-optic response to measure the frequency, voltage, and spatial dependence of CDW “repolarization”

= V() / V()

Spot size = 50 m

Page 6: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

Fits to: = 0 / { 1- (0)2 + (-i0)}

1/0 = delay time (→ 0 near contact)<1: distribution of relaxation times

T = 80 K, = 890 cm-1

0 = average relaxation time, decreases with increasing voltage

Page 7: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

T = 80 K

#1 #2 #3

820 890 820 cm-1

X = 0

X = 100 m

X = 200 m

= )0 / {1 - (0)2 + (-i}

• Relaxation time 0 ~ V-p (1<p<2), and increases slowly with distance from contact.

• Delay time 1/0 decreases more slowly with voltage, but increases rapidly with distance from contacts: strain flows from contacts.

• often decreases with decreasing current: distribution of time constants (current?).

Can we understand these effects from “simple” model of CDW phase dynamics?

Page 8: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

Adelman et al successfully used a 1D model to describe changes in phase after a current reversal in NbSe3:

phase slip

exp( )B

ps or rx

1

Q x

Strain:

Phase slip rate:

Pinning field

Damping ElasticityElectric

We solved for the periodic strain response to a square wave current as a function of frequency, and found the first Fourier component, , to simulate the lock-in response.

{Normal and (high-field) CDW resistivities

∂/∂t = [Q/enc(0+c)] [0Jtotal – Eon + (Q/enc)K∂2/∂x2] - ∫rps((x’,t)dx’

Note: this is the (elastic) diffusion equation for phase changes, with the extra, strongly nonlinear phase-slip term:

∂/∂t = (Jtotal – Eon/0) + D ∂2/∂x2 - ∫rpsdx’, with diffusion constant D = (Q/enc)2 K / [0 + c]

x

-∞

Page 9: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

contacts

phase

phase

Pinned contacts

Free contacts

j = 0 at the contact

j= 0 far away from the contact

K MoO0.3 3

NbSe 3

We considered two different boundary conditions for the phase:

We used Adelman’s 90 K NbSe3 parameters:(blue bronze parameters not determined)

7 60

3 1 1

3 3 15 -1 -10

8.8 10 m; 3.0 10 m

6.2 10 eV ; 0.45

1.9 10 ; 5 10 m s

0.024

c

c

B

x x

K x A Q A

n x A r x

Eon = 170 mV/cm

Page 10: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

(10-3

)

0

1

2

3

(kHz)1 10 100

0

1

x = 0

2 jT1.4 jT

1.2 jT

x = 200 m

0.0

0.5

1.0

(kHz)0.1 1 10 100

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.2 jT

1.4 jT

2 jTIN-PHASE

QUADRATURE

IN-PHASE

QUADRATURE

Pinned Contacts

Free Contacts

Solid symbols: Pinned contacts

Open symbols: Free contacts

Fits to = 0 / {1-02 + (-i}

relaxation

delay

•Response is delayed relaxation, with delay time increasing away from contacts.

•Poorer fits at x=0, because 0 →∞.

• Allowing phase slip beyond the contacts (“free contacts”) slows the response at all points; i.e. phase slip beyond the contacts “holds the strain back”.

Page 11: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

jtotal / jT

( s

)

10

100

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

jtotal / jT1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

0.8

0.9

1.0

0 / 2

(k

Hz)

10

20

1.3 1.4

80

100

1

2

3

4 x = 0

x = 100 m

x = 200 m

pinned

free

Solid symbols: Pinned contactsOpen symbols: Free contacts

• Relaxation time and delay time (1/0) decrease with increasing current (0 has much stronger dependence on j).

•Both time constants increase with distance from contact; 1/0 → 0 at x=0.

• ~ independent of current: single relaxation time. (Smaller value at x=0 is artifact of fit.)

/ {1-02 + (-i}

For free contacts,, the phase-slip beyond the contact causes peak in 0 at low current.

For pinned contacts, 0 saturates at the diffusion value:

0 = L2/2D

Page 12: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

In 1983, Fisher proposed that CDW depinning was a dynamic critical transition. His model assumes that near depinning onset, CDW deformations are elastic, i.e. phase-slip is negligible.

In 3d, renormalization group calculation of critical properties, Narayan and Fisher found that the CDW velocity, coherence length, and diffusion constant vary as:

v (V/Von-1)5/6, ξ (V/Von-1)-1/2D (V/Von-1)-1/6,

Previous experimental searches for critical behavior have concentrated on the CDW velocity, for which it is difficult to escape effects of contacts and phase-slip, and have had mixed results.

We instead attempted to use electro-optic response to look for divergence of D (i.e. decrease of 0 (V/Von-1)1/6) near Von.

Page 13: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

Expected behavior of 0

This required a sample with a large region (Von < V < VT) with ~ elastic deformations (i.e. “no” phase-slip) to observe saturation of 0.

Page 14: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

Worked adjacent to contact so delay time small (i.e. 0 ~ ∞) and relaxation peak most clearly defined.

x=0, T = 78 K, = 850 cm-1

Fits to R/R = A0 / [1 + (-i0)]

Res

ista

nce

(k

)

2.0

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

V (mV)

8 10 12 14 16

R /

R

-0.0001

0.0000

0.0001

0.0002

0.0003

0.0004

IN-PHASE

QUADRATURE

Von

VT

T = 78 K, = 850 cm-1, = 25 Hz, x=0

Page 15: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

V / Von

1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

0

(ms) 10

x=0, T = 78 K

V / Von

1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

0.8

1.0

V / Von

1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

A0

(%)

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

(a)

2

30

VT

R/R = A0 / [1 + (-i0)]

We observe expected saturation of 0, but no decrease for V/Von ≥ 1.06;

→ (V/Von-1)crit < 0.06.

0(sat) ~ 20 ms

→ D = L2/20 = 0.02 cm2/s

Page 16: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

D = (Qen)2K/(0+CDW) → the CDW elastic constant K = 0.1 eV/Å, (one order of magnitude greater than (semimetallic) NbSe3).

2 bands condense into CDW

Taking K = 4(Q/2)mFv2, with

Fröhlich mass mF = 250 me

→ phason velocity v = 14 km/s

consistent with neutron scattering results of Hennion et al [PRL 68, 2374 (1992)].

→ If CDW polarization is due to motion (glide) of dislocation lines, they diffuse with same constant as the

CDW has for small phase perturbations.

OR

CDW polarization involves smooth, continuous changes in phase (like phasons).

Page 17: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

Summary• Electro-optic measurements used to measure the dynamics of

changes in CDW phase. Response to alternating voltages: “delayed relaxation”.

• Relaxation time decreases rapidly with voltage and increases slowly with distance from current; delay time decreases slowly with voltage and increases rapidly with distance: consistent with model in which phase changes are governed by diffusion + phase-slip.

• The diffusion constant is consistent with the measured phason velocity → polarization controlled by same “intrinsic” elastic constant as phasons.

• No decrease in relaxation time (i.e. divergence of the diffusion constant) is observed near depinning onset, implying that the critical region:

(V/Von-1)crit < 0.06

!! Thank you, Natasha, Pierre, and Serguei !!

Page 18: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

Want to look for correlations between current induced torsional strain and gradient of CDW phase

(electro-optic response):

Need wide (> 20 m) crystals of TaS3 !!!

TaS3, T = 80 K

Page 19: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

Time Dependence of Voltage for Square-Wave Currents

“overshoot”

Page 20: L. Ladino,  J.W. Brill,   University of Kentucky Supporting measurements: M. Uddin, M. Freamat,

V / Von

1 10

(

ms)

0.1

1

10

V / Von

1 10(L

0/L)

2

(m

s)0.1

1

10

100