(1)

2012 UH and HPU Kukui CupEnergy Consumption Data:

Preliminary Report

Philip JohnsonCollaborative Software Development Laboratory

Information and Computer SciencesUniversity of Hawaii

(2)

UH Data Background Data points at weekly intervals.

Prior to challenge (August):•One data point last week of August

Challenge (Month of September):•Four data points during September.•Orange rectangle highlights interval

Post challenge (October) :•Three data points in October.

(3)

UH Building-level Data

(4)

Lokelani and Mokihana Buildings

Upward trend in consumption.

(5)

Ilima and Lehua Buildings

Lehua "flat" for first 2 weeks, then upward trend

(6)

UH Lounge-level Data

For ease of review, only 2 or 3 lounges per chart

(7)

UH Ilima A, B

Little apparent impact of challenge.

(8)

UH Ilima C, D, E

Ilima-E: flattened for first week, then upward. Ilima-D: flat the whole way through.

(9)

UH Lehua A, B

Little apparent impact of challenge.

(10)

UH Lehua C, D, E

Lehua-D: ~9% decrease from 8/27 to 9/17 (64% participation)

(11)

UH Lokelani A, B

Little apparent impact of challenge. (43%, 9% participation)

(12)

UH Lokelani C, D, E

Little apparent impact of challenge. (50%, 20%, 33% participation)

(13)

UH Mokihana A, B

Little apparent impact of challenge. (28%, 38% participation)

(14)

UH Mokihana C, D, E

Little apparent impact of challenge (38%, 32%, 21% participation)

(15)

HPU Data Background No lounges: all building level.

3 week challenge: •September 17 – October 7•Orange rectangle around interval

Lehua building data•Not available due to meter misconfiguration.

(16)

HPU Lokelani

20% drop from 9/17 to 9/24 (100% participation)

(17)

HPU Mokihana

13% drop from 9/10 to 9/24 (64% participation)

(18)

HPU Melia

Little apparent impact of challenge. (8% participation)

(19)

HPU Kukui

Little apparent impact of challenge. (9% participation)

(20)

HPU Ilima

Little apparent impact of challenge. (9% participation)

(21)

Insight 1: Participation Level of participation is correlated with perceptible change in consumption on weekly basis.

If participation is greater than 60%, then consumption changes perceptibly•UH/Lehua-D: 64% participation, 9% drop•HPU/Lokelani: 100% participation, 20% drop•HPU/Mokihana: 64% participation, 13% drop

(22)

Insight 2: Building level trends UH buildings showed a significant increase in energy consumption from August to October. •Effect of competition was to temporarily "flatten" this increase.

HPU Buildings did not show this trend.•Effect of competition was more significant.

Not sure why there is this difference between UH and HPU.

(23)

HPU building consumption flat

(24)

UH building consumption increased 13%, 19%, 26%, 26%

(25)

Questions?