KTAG Mechanics, Optics and Cooling

Progress and Schedule

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 1

KTAG Schedule for Technical Run

• Build stage-1 detector January 2012 to July 2012– Half detector (4 octants) [Incorporate improvements later]– 32-channel readout [Final design is 64]– Preliminary optics [defer cost and complexity]

• CEDAR Activities May – December 2012– Dry run and DAQ integration 15 – 31 July– Complete and test KTAG in UK 31 July – Install KTAG & Integration August - September– Technical Run 12 October – 9 December– Data to understand beam backgrounds, finalise Mechanics &

Optical design and understanding of DAQ & Electronics for 2014

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 2

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 3

Support cylinder bolted to CEDAR

Cooling block

Support Cylinder bolted to CEDAR flange

Quartz lens

90o spherical mirror

Octant

HV connectors

ATEX nitrogenenclosure

Detector frame

Lightguide

Liverpool Design and FabricationDesign Fabrication– Support Tube Installed on CEDAR Nose– Light guide 1 Completed– Remaining 3 lightguides End of May– Detector Framework Assembled in Liverpool– Optical support cylinder Completion end of May– ATEX-2 chamber & supports Completion immanent

– Lens & mirror mounts Outside company – end of May– Cooling assembly – May Completion mid June (in house)– Environmental Case & Frame

• Materials arrive & cut at RohaSell 25th May -> 2nd June• Panels encased in aluminium Delivery 15th June• Installation Frame Completion mid June

– Lightguide & electronics box Components (outside company) – May

– Integration of cooling & electronics JuneNA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 4

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 5

Development Work

•Gluing conical inserts•Measuring reflectivity•Cooling and Chiller

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 6

Gluing method• Standard aluminium surface preparation

– Removing loose particles– Degreasing– Polishing cone or fitting aluminised-mylar insert

• Mylar mounting - vacuum pen development

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 7

Gluing of aluminised mylar (update)Procedure • Mylar covered (electrostatically) with protective

layer of food-wrap, “sandwiched” in layers of 10 • Conical inserts cut with the use of a template• Degreased Al light guide cones covered with

given amount of Araldite (gluing pen) • Mylar inserted with a vacuum pen and hold with

keeper till the epoxy cures• Finished light guide stacked in the cabinet

• Handling procedure developed with the use of 3-D printer model and final Al material samples

Development Work

•Gluing conical inserts•Measuring reflectivity•Cooling and Chiller

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 9

Reflectivity measurement

,0 /201 fxfxDD 2202 //1 fxfxDD

Variable – divergence lens system. The divergence angle θ increases as the positive element is moved toward the input by the distance x.

320 /5.0arctan2 fxD

G. A. Massey, Beam Diverging Lens System for High Power Laser Transmitters, Applied Optics, Vol. 11, Issue 12, pp. 2981_1-2981_1 (1972)

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012

(small-angles)

fDMAX /0 fDMAX /0

100/1/0 fDMAX

10

Laser beam profile

cone without measured light, ofintensity maximum

[mm] 8 withincontained-only light direct

lightdirect reflected ofintensity ~ current) photo(

4.0

max

][8

][18

max

][8][18

ph

mmph

mmph

phreflected

mmph

mmph

I

I

I

III

yreflecivit

Laser beam profile: light intensity incident on the 18 [mm] cone composed of ~60% direct light within central 8[mm] diameter and in ~40% reflecting from the surface of aluminised mylar. In contradiction to a simple geometrical expectation of direct light. %20)9/4( 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718190

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9 Laser beam profile

distance [mm]

Pho

to c

urre

nt [μA]

Beam profile will be re-measured using CCD camera + adequate software

Measurement of reflectivity.• Reflectivity measurement of the

aluminized mylar inserts compared with polished Al cones.

• Large variation in handling quality tested .

• For a “reasonable” finish ~92% reflected light observed

• Preliminary due to small size of Al sample.

with polished Al ~15% lower reflectivity measured

Development Work

•Gluing conical inserts•Measuring reflectivity•Cooling and Chiller

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 13

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 14

Draft Chiller Requirements (March 2011)

T rise 0.5deg C 0.25deg C 0.10 deg C

Bore 4mm 6mm 8mm 4mm 6mm 8mm 4mm 6mm 8mm

Flow 3.09 3.09 3.09 6.17 6.17 6.17 15.43 15.43 15.43

Pressure 3.52 0.55 0.17 11.8 1.83 0.57 58.8 9.13 2.83

• Tabulate Flow and pressure for different bores of the internal pipe work and desired temperature rise

• Chiller Specifications (preliminary web-trawl)

Model Power Flow (lpm @ 0 bar) Pressure (bar)Fryka DLK 402 380W @ 30C 4 0.15Grant RC350G 350W @ 20C 15 1.60 (@1 lpm)Neslab Thermoflex 900/P2 900W @ 40C 12.5 (@4.1 bar) 7 barJubalo FC600S 600W @ 20C 15 1.2Cole-parmer WU-13042-07 250W @ 20C 21 0.8Lauda WK 502 600W @ 20C 10 (@1.5bar) 2.2

Thermo-Scientific (NESLAB)

• The Chiller is ordered: delivery end May

– ThermoFlex (5 models: 0.75kW to 4.4kW)• 5C to 40C• P2 pump gives 12.5lpm @ 4.1b• Eg. ThermoFlex 1400 (1170W) = £3,773 + VAT (28 days)

• Internal detector pipe work is 6 mm (ID) stainless steel

15NA62 CEDAR Meeting 26March2012

Useful Facilities• Auto-restart

– Chiller can be configure to re-start if mains power is interrupted.

• I/O – Merlin: 12/24V remote start/stop + external RTD– ThermoFlex: 15-pin I/O connector

• Relays for: low level, pump on/off, low flow + 2 configurable• Remote start/stop• 10mV/deg C analogue output of temperature• 10mV/deg C remote set point (eg 200mV=20deg C)

16NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012

Assembly & Testing

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 17

Assembly Frame with Support Tube

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 18

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 19

Assembly Procedure• The detector will be assembled and tested in Liverpool:

– LH half is fully instrumented with optics, cooling and electronics– Cabling within octants and from octants to patch panel– Functional test of electronics– RH half has cooling plates and pipe-work– Thermocouples and photodiodes to measure environment

• The assembly frame is mounted and installation tested• The environmental case is fitted and environmental

measurements made (light and temperature)• Ship to CERN and install each half of detector, then

environmental case and external cabling to patch panels.

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 20

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 21

Support cylinder bolted to CEDAR

Cooling block

Support Cylinder bolted to CEDAR flange

Quartz lens

90o spherical mirror

Octant

HV connectors

ATEX nitrogenenclosure

Detector frame

Lightguide

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 22

Frame doubles as:

Installation framefor detector

Support frame for panels comprising Environmental Case

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 23

Environmental Cover• Light- and gas-tight• Thermally insulated• Faraday cage• Fire resistant

Patch panelsNino

HV

Liverpool Assembly Schedule• Assembly Frame with Support Cylinder Complete• Detector Support Frame Complete• ATEX enclosure and Mirror mounts End May• Lightguides and PMT housings Early June• Electronics & Octant wiring Mid June• Cooling panels, chiller & PT100’s Mid June• Detector cabling and patch panels End June• Mechanical installation test End June• Environmental Enclosure Early July• External cabling to EE patch panel Early July• Temporary LED system and System test Mid July• Pack and ship to CERN End July

NA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 24

UK Goals for Technical Run• K+ Identification: measurement of efficiency for K and π

– Measure normalisation: Actual light/MC light– Measure shape & distribution of light spot – compare with MC

• Thermal Environment– Measure temperature and temperature gradient– Establish operating parameters for Chiller

• Assess effectiveness of Monitoring & LED systems• Electronics

– PMT rates, saturation, cross talk, time resolution– Trigger, DAQ, links to central control– CEDAR motor control and display

• Beam measurement programmeNA62 CEDAR Meeting 3May2012 25