KTAC BSQR2004-05

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    1/21

    CHEC-OWT JOINT VENTURE-

    CEDD CONTRACT NO. CV/2004/05MAINTENANCE DREDGING (2005-08)

    W.O. No.: MD/33/04

    BASELINE SEDIMENT QUALITY REPORT(BSQR)

    AT

    KAI TAK APPROACH CHANNEL (KTAC)

    DATE STATUS /REVISION DESCRIPTIONSPREPARED

    BY:VERIFIED &

    APPROVED BY:

    24.11.2005 First Issue CTK/JAL LC

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    2/21

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    3/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    Page 1 of 11

    1. INTRODUCTIONAccording to the requirements of W.O. No. MD/33/04, sediment sampling

    and testing at Kai Tak Approach Channel (KTAC) was to be carried out to

    assess the sediments physical, chemical and biological properties and hence

    level of contamination prior to sediment treatment. The results of the

    sampling events are presented in this Baseline Sediment Quality Report

    (BSQR).

    Information contained in this ISQR includes:

    1. Layout of the sampling locations;2. Summary of test results on site and in laboratories; and3. Detailed laboratory analytical reports.

    2. METHODOLOGYThe approximate extent of treatment is 1 hectare. All works described in this

    report were carried out in accordance with the methods detailed in the Works

    Order, or specified otherwise. A location plan of the proposed treatment areaand sampling locations is attached inAppendix A . All samples were taken in

    presence of representative(s) from Civil Engineering and Development

    Department (CEDD). All field observations and in-situ measurement results

    were also recorded in Sediment Monitoring Data Sheets (SMDS), which is

    presented inAppendix B .

    Measurements of pH and redox were carried out in-situ for samples at all

    depths. Those sediments collected at the depth of 10 - 30 cm were stored in

    0.25 L brown glass jars and plastic bags, and were labeled for further

    laboratory analysis. Sediments were also collected at the depth of 40 - 60 cm

    and 70 - 90cm (if sediment samples were available) for AVS analysis. Details

    of laboratory analytical methodologies and the associated detection limits are

    summarized inAppendix C. All samples were delivered to laboratory on the

    same date of sampling, under the custody of CEDDs representatives.

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    4/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    Page 2 of 11

    3. RESULTSThe following paragraphs provide discussions of the in-situ and laboratory

    analytical results. A tabulated summary of monitoring results is given in

    Appendix D, whereas the detailed analytical reports are presented in

    Appendix E.

    3.1 Field Observations

    The sediment sampling was carried out on 22nd September 2005. It was

    sunny throughout the sampling event.

    The thickness of penetrable sediments varied between 0.69 to 0.99 m.

    Almost all of the cores were black in color and soft in texture. Leaves

    were noted to have been trapped in some of the cores. Most cores were

    also noted to have very strong hydrogen sulphide smell at the sediment

    surface, and decreasing towards the bottom.

    No clear sediment and water interface was seen during sediment

    sampling. Sediments were seen loose and fluffy, with a thickness ofapproximately 0.2 0.3 m.

    3.2 Field Measurements

    3.2.1 pH

    The following values were recorded on pH:

    Average pHArea

    10 - 30 cm 40 - 60 cm 70 - 90 cm

    A1 6.72 6.69 6.77A2 6.84 7.09 7.03

    A3 6.82 6.77 6.84A4 6.70 6.75 6.71

    Average 6.77 6.82 6.84

    The pH values for individual cores at the monitoring locations

    ranged from a minimum of 6.48 at Area A1 (A1-0-b) to a

    maximum of 8.86 at Area A2 (A2-0-a), with an average value of

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    5/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    Page 3 of 11

    6.79.

    3.2.2 Redox

    The following values were recorded on redox:

    Average Redox (mV)Area

    10 - 30 cm 40 - 60 cm 70 - 90 cm

    A1 -438 -384 -340A2 -326 -296 -261

    A3 -465 -388 -368

    A4 -445 -433 -391

    Average -418 -375 -340

    Redox values provide an indication of the biochemical

    conditions within the sediments and the lower the redox value,

    the greater the potential of odour problems.

    The highest and the lowest average redox measurement on

    individual cores are 694 mVin core A1-0-d and -201 mV in

    A2-0-a, with an average value of 378 mV.

    3.3 Chemical Analytical Results

    3.3.1 Acid Volatile Sulphide (AVS)

    AVS (mg/kg dry wt.)Area

    10 - 30 cm 40 - 60 cm 70 - 90 cm

    A1 5,500 6,975 8,950A2 6,300 7,975 9,050

    A3 6,500 8,550 7,925

    A4 7,000 8,075 8,250

    Average 6,325 7,894 8,544

    The recorded acid volatile sulphide (AVS) concentrations

    ranged from 5,500 mg/kg in Area A1 to 9,050 mg/kgin Area A2,

    with an average value of 7,588 mg/kg.

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    6/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    Page 4 of 11

    3.3.2 Nitrate Nitrogen (NO3-N)

    Area Nitrate Nitrogen*

    (mg NO3 -N /L wet)A1

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    7/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    Page 5 of 11

    ^UCEL (Upper Chemical Exceedace Level) and LCEL (Lower Chemical Exceedance

    Level) as stated in Works Bureau Technical Circular No. 3/2000 Management of

    Dredged / Excavated Sediment.

    The highest and the lowest heavy metal contents were generally

    found in Area A3 and Area A4 respectively. The analytical

    results were also compared with the Sediment Quality Criteria

    as listed in the Works Bureau Technical Circular No. 3/2000

    Management of Dredged / Excavated Sediment. All samples

    have exceedance of UCEL with most of the heavy metals, except

    for arsenic.

    3.3.5 Heavy Metals in Sediment Interstitial Water (Elutriate Test)Heavy Metals (g/L)Area

    Cr Cu Zn

    A1

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    8/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    Page 6 of 11

    LCEL < value < UCEL

    Value > UCEL

    * Result represents samples collected from 10-30 cm section.

    ^UCEL (Upper Chemical Exceedace Level) and LCEL (Lower Chemical Exceedance

    Level) as stated in Works Bureau Technical Circular No. 3/2000 Management of

    Dredged / Excavated Sediment.

    Low molecular weight polyaromatic hydrocarbons (LMW

    PAHs) concentrations in sediment were below the detection

    limit (55g/kg) in all sampling areas nor the criteria as stated in

    the Technical Circular.

    3.3.7 High Molecular Weight Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (HMWPAHs)

    Area HMW PAHs *(g/kg dry wt.)

    LCEL^(g/kg dry wt.)

    UCEL^(g/kg dry wt.)

    A1

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    9/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    Page 7 of 11

    3.3.8 Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Total PCBs)Area Total PCBs *

    (g/kg dry wt.)

    LCEL^

    (g/kg dry wt.)

    UCEL^

    (g/kg dry wt.)A1

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    10/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    Page 8 of 11

    as stated in the Technical Circular.

    3.4 Biological Analytical Results

    3.4.1 Microtox - Direct Sediment Contact

    Area EC50 (%)

    A1 0.01

    A2 0.02

    A3 0.04

    A4 0.02

    Average 0.02

    Two tests were performed on the sediment samples, a direct

    sediment contact bioassay and a saline extract bioassay. For the

    sediment contact bioassays, the results showed that the EC50

    ranged from 0.01% in Area A1 to 0.04% in Area A3, with an

    average value of 0.02%.

    3.4.2 Microtox - Saline Extract

    Area Luminescence Ratio (L.R.)

    A1 0.85

    A2 0.71

    A3 0.72

    A4 0.78

    Average 0.76

    The results of the saline extract showed no significant toxicity to

    allow for calculation of EC50. The Luminescence Ratio (L.R.) is

    used to assess the potential change in sediment toxicity. The

    pre-treatment L. R. ranged from 0.71 in Area A2 to 0.85 in Area

    A1 with an average value of 0.76.

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    11/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    Page 9 of 11

    3.4.3 10-day Burrowing Amphipod Toxicity TestArea 10-day Burrowing Amphipod

    Toxicity Test (mean % survival)A1 0

    A2 0

    A3 0A4 0

    Average 0

    The results showed that 0% of amphipods survived the 10-day

    toxicity test in all sampling areas.

    3.4.4 20-day Burrowing Polychaete Toxicity TestArea 20-day Burrowing Polychaete

    Toxicity Test (mean % survival)

    A1 0A2 0

    A3 0

    A4 0

    Average 0

    The results showed that 0% of polychaete survived the 20-day

    toxicity test in all sampling areas.

    3.4.5 48-96-hour Bivalve LarvaeArea 48-96-hour Bivalve Larvae

    (mean normality survival %)

    A1 0A2 0

    A3 0

    A4 0

    Average 0

    The results showed that 0% of bivalve larvae survived the

    48-96-hour toxicity test in all sampling areas.

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    12/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    Page 10 of 11

    4. ConclusionsThis ISQR presents the results of sediment samplings in Kai Tak Approach

    Channel. The overall findings and conclusions are summarized in the

    following Table 1:

    Parameter /Unit Min Max Average

    Core Length(m)

    0.69 0.99 0.87

    pH

    10 30 cm 6.53 6.90 6.77

    40 60 cm 6.52 8.86 6.82

    70 90 cm 6.61 7.25 6.84Redox

    10 30 cm -694 -201 -418

    40 60cm -641 -229 -375

    70 90 cm (mV) -506 -230 -369

    AVS(mg/kg dry wt.)

    5,500 7,000 6,325

    NO3-N(mg /L wet vol.)

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    13/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    Page 11 of 11

    Parameter /Unit Min Max Average

    LMW PAHs(g/kg dry wt.)

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    14/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    APPENDIX A

    LOCATION PLAN O F

    SEDIMENT SAMPLING LO CATIONS

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    15/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    Table A Coordinates of Sampling Locat ions

    Sampling

    Location I.D. Northing Easting

    A1 820 062 838 929

    A2 820 027 838 964

    A3 820 026 838 894

    A4 819 991 838 930

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    16/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    APPENDIX B

    SEDIMENT MO NITOR ING DA TA SHEETS

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    17/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    APPENDIX C

    LABOR ATO RY AN ALYTICAL METHODOLO GIES

    & DETECTION LIMITS

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    18/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    Table C Analy ti cal Methodologies and Detection Limit s

    Parameters Determination Method

    Detection

    Limit

    Acid Volatile Sulphide(AVS)

    "Diffusion Method for theDetermination of Acid-Volatile Sulphidein Sediment" H Brouwer & T.P. Murphy,Env. Toxicology & Chemistry, Vol 13,No. 8, pp 1273-1275, 1994

    1 mg/kg

    Nitrate-Nitrogen(NO3-N)

    APHA 4500 NO3-N E and 4500-NO2- B 1 mg/kg

    Microtox Microtox operating Manual - SalineExtract & Solid Phase Test

    N/A

    Chromium USEPA 6020A 8 mg/kg

    Cadmium USEPA 6020A 0.2 mg/kgCopper USEPA 6020A 7 mg/kgMercury USEPA 6020A 0.05 mg/kgNickel USEPA 6020A 4 mg/kgLead USEPA 6020A 8 mg/kgSilver USEPA 6020A 0.1 mg/kgZinc USEPA 6020A 20 mg/kgArsenic USEPA 6020A 1 mg/kgChromium(in interstititial water)

    W/DIG/RAR & M/ICP-MS 1 g/L

    Copper(in interstititial water)

    W/DIG/RAR & M/ICP-MS 1 g/L

    Zinc

    (in interstititial water)

    W/DIG/RAR & M/ICP-MS 10 g/L

    Total Organic Carbon(TOC)

    APHA 5310B 0.05 % w/w

    Low Molecular WeightPAHs

    USEPA 8270C 55 g/kg

    High Molecular WeightPAHs

    USEPA 8270C 170 g/kg

    Total PCBs USEPA 8270C 2 g/kg

    Tributyltin UNEP/IOC/IAEA 0.015 g/L

    Amphipod Test USEPA 1994 N/A

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    19/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    Parameters Determination MethodDetection

    Limit

    Polychaete Test PSEP 1995 N/A

    Bivalve Test PSEP 1995 N/A

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    20/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    APPENDIX D

    TABULATED SUMMA RY OF MO NITOR ING RESULTS

  • 8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05

    21/21

    Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005

    Contract No. CV/2004/05

    CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR

    APPENDIX E

    LABORA TORY AN ALYTICAL REPORTS