Upload
vincent-ng
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
1/21
CHEC-OWT JOINT VENTURE-
CEDD CONTRACT NO. CV/2004/05MAINTENANCE DREDGING (2005-08)
W.O. No.: MD/33/04
BASELINE SEDIMENT QUALITY REPORT(BSQR)
AT
KAI TAK APPROACH CHANNEL (KTAC)
DATE STATUS /REVISION DESCRIPTIONSPREPARED
BY:VERIFIED &
APPROVED BY:
24.11.2005 First Issue CTK/JAL LC
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
2/21
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
3/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
Page 1 of 11
1. INTRODUCTIONAccording to the requirements of W.O. No. MD/33/04, sediment sampling
and testing at Kai Tak Approach Channel (KTAC) was to be carried out to
assess the sediments physical, chemical and biological properties and hence
level of contamination prior to sediment treatment. The results of the
sampling events are presented in this Baseline Sediment Quality Report
(BSQR).
Information contained in this ISQR includes:
1. Layout of the sampling locations;2. Summary of test results on site and in laboratories; and3. Detailed laboratory analytical reports.
2. METHODOLOGYThe approximate extent of treatment is 1 hectare. All works described in this
report were carried out in accordance with the methods detailed in the Works
Order, or specified otherwise. A location plan of the proposed treatment areaand sampling locations is attached inAppendix A . All samples were taken in
presence of representative(s) from Civil Engineering and Development
Department (CEDD). All field observations and in-situ measurement results
were also recorded in Sediment Monitoring Data Sheets (SMDS), which is
presented inAppendix B .
Measurements of pH and redox were carried out in-situ for samples at all
depths. Those sediments collected at the depth of 10 - 30 cm were stored in
0.25 L brown glass jars and plastic bags, and were labeled for further
laboratory analysis. Sediments were also collected at the depth of 40 - 60 cm
and 70 - 90cm (if sediment samples were available) for AVS analysis. Details
of laboratory analytical methodologies and the associated detection limits are
summarized inAppendix C. All samples were delivered to laboratory on the
same date of sampling, under the custody of CEDDs representatives.
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
4/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
Page 2 of 11
3. RESULTSThe following paragraphs provide discussions of the in-situ and laboratory
analytical results. A tabulated summary of monitoring results is given in
Appendix D, whereas the detailed analytical reports are presented in
Appendix E.
3.1 Field Observations
The sediment sampling was carried out on 22nd September 2005. It was
sunny throughout the sampling event.
The thickness of penetrable sediments varied between 0.69 to 0.99 m.
Almost all of the cores were black in color and soft in texture. Leaves
were noted to have been trapped in some of the cores. Most cores were
also noted to have very strong hydrogen sulphide smell at the sediment
surface, and decreasing towards the bottom.
No clear sediment and water interface was seen during sediment
sampling. Sediments were seen loose and fluffy, with a thickness ofapproximately 0.2 0.3 m.
3.2 Field Measurements
3.2.1 pH
The following values were recorded on pH:
Average pHArea
10 - 30 cm 40 - 60 cm 70 - 90 cm
A1 6.72 6.69 6.77A2 6.84 7.09 7.03
A3 6.82 6.77 6.84A4 6.70 6.75 6.71
Average 6.77 6.82 6.84
The pH values for individual cores at the monitoring locations
ranged from a minimum of 6.48 at Area A1 (A1-0-b) to a
maximum of 8.86 at Area A2 (A2-0-a), with an average value of
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
5/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
Page 3 of 11
6.79.
3.2.2 Redox
The following values were recorded on redox:
Average Redox (mV)Area
10 - 30 cm 40 - 60 cm 70 - 90 cm
A1 -438 -384 -340A2 -326 -296 -261
A3 -465 -388 -368
A4 -445 -433 -391
Average -418 -375 -340
Redox values provide an indication of the biochemical
conditions within the sediments and the lower the redox value,
the greater the potential of odour problems.
The highest and the lowest average redox measurement on
individual cores are 694 mVin core A1-0-d and -201 mV in
A2-0-a, with an average value of 378 mV.
3.3 Chemical Analytical Results
3.3.1 Acid Volatile Sulphide (AVS)
AVS (mg/kg dry wt.)Area
10 - 30 cm 40 - 60 cm 70 - 90 cm
A1 5,500 6,975 8,950A2 6,300 7,975 9,050
A3 6,500 8,550 7,925
A4 7,000 8,075 8,250
Average 6,325 7,894 8,544
The recorded acid volatile sulphide (AVS) concentrations
ranged from 5,500 mg/kg in Area A1 to 9,050 mg/kgin Area A2,
with an average value of 7,588 mg/kg.
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
6/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
Page 4 of 11
3.3.2 Nitrate Nitrogen (NO3-N)
Area Nitrate Nitrogen*
(mg NO3 -N /L wet)A1
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
7/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
Page 5 of 11
^UCEL (Upper Chemical Exceedace Level) and LCEL (Lower Chemical Exceedance
Level) as stated in Works Bureau Technical Circular No. 3/2000 Management of
Dredged / Excavated Sediment.
The highest and the lowest heavy metal contents were generally
found in Area A3 and Area A4 respectively. The analytical
results were also compared with the Sediment Quality Criteria
as listed in the Works Bureau Technical Circular No. 3/2000
Management of Dredged / Excavated Sediment. All samples
have exceedance of UCEL with most of the heavy metals, except
for arsenic.
3.3.5 Heavy Metals in Sediment Interstitial Water (Elutriate Test)Heavy Metals (g/L)Area
Cr Cu Zn
A1
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
8/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
Page 6 of 11
LCEL < value < UCEL
Value > UCEL
* Result represents samples collected from 10-30 cm section.
^UCEL (Upper Chemical Exceedace Level) and LCEL (Lower Chemical Exceedance
Level) as stated in Works Bureau Technical Circular No. 3/2000 Management of
Dredged / Excavated Sediment.
Low molecular weight polyaromatic hydrocarbons (LMW
PAHs) concentrations in sediment were below the detection
limit (55g/kg) in all sampling areas nor the criteria as stated in
the Technical Circular.
3.3.7 High Molecular Weight Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (HMWPAHs)
Area HMW PAHs *(g/kg dry wt.)
LCEL^(g/kg dry wt.)
UCEL^(g/kg dry wt.)
A1
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
9/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
Page 7 of 11
3.3.8 Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Total PCBs)Area Total PCBs *
(g/kg dry wt.)
LCEL^
(g/kg dry wt.)
UCEL^
(g/kg dry wt.)A1
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
10/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
Page 8 of 11
as stated in the Technical Circular.
3.4 Biological Analytical Results
3.4.1 Microtox - Direct Sediment Contact
Area EC50 (%)
A1 0.01
A2 0.02
A3 0.04
A4 0.02
Average 0.02
Two tests were performed on the sediment samples, a direct
sediment contact bioassay and a saline extract bioassay. For the
sediment contact bioassays, the results showed that the EC50
ranged from 0.01% in Area A1 to 0.04% in Area A3, with an
average value of 0.02%.
3.4.2 Microtox - Saline Extract
Area Luminescence Ratio (L.R.)
A1 0.85
A2 0.71
A3 0.72
A4 0.78
Average 0.76
The results of the saline extract showed no significant toxicity to
allow for calculation of EC50. The Luminescence Ratio (L.R.) is
used to assess the potential change in sediment toxicity. The
pre-treatment L. R. ranged from 0.71 in Area A2 to 0.85 in Area
A1 with an average value of 0.76.
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
11/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
Page 9 of 11
3.4.3 10-day Burrowing Amphipod Toxicity TestArea 10-day Burrowing Amphipod
Toxicity Test (mean % survival)A1 0
A2 0
A3 0A4 0
Average 0
The results showed that 0% of amphipods survived the 10-day
toxicity test in all sampling areas.
3.4.4 20-day Burrowing Polychaete Toxicity TestArea 20-day Burrowing Polychaete
Toxicity Test (mean % survival)
A1 0A2 0
A3 0
A4 0
Average 0
The results showed that 0% of polychaete survived the 20-day
toxicity test in all sampling areas.
3.4.5 48-96-hour Bivalve LarvaeArea 48-96-hour Bivalve Larvae
(mean normality survival %)
A1 0A2 0
A3 0
A4 0
Average 0
The results showed that 0% of bivalve larvae survived the
48-96-hour toxicity test in all sampling areas.
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
12/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
Page 10 of 11
4. ConclusionsThis ISQR presents the results of sediment samplings in Kai Tak Approach
Channel. The overall findings and conclusions are summarized in the
following Table 1:
Parameter /Unit Min Max Average
Core Length(m)
0.69 0.99 0.87
pH
10 30 cm 6.53 6.90 6.77
40 60 cm 6.52 8.86 6.82
70 90 cm 6.61 7.25 6.84Redox
10 30 cm -694 -201 -418
40 60cm -641 -229 -375
70 90 cm (mV) -506 -230 -369
AVS(mg/kg dry wt.)
5,500 7,000 6,325
NO3-N(mg /L wet vol.)
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
13/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
Page 11 of 11
Parameter /Unit Min Max Average
LMW PAHs(g/kg dry wt.)
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
14/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
APPENDIX A
LOCATION PLAN O F
SEDIMENT SAMPLING LO CATIONS
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
15/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
Table A Coordinates of Sampling Locat ions
Sampling
Location I.D. Northing Easting
A1 820 062 838 929
A2 820 027 838 964
A3 820 026 838 894
A4 819 991 838 930
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
16/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
APPENDIX B
SEDIMENT MO NITOR ING DA TA SHEETS
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
17/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
APPENDIX C
LABOR ATO RY AN ALYTICAL METHODOLO GIES
& DETECTION LIMITS
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
18/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
Table C Analy ti cal Methodologies and Detection Limit s
Parameters Determination Method
Detection
Limit
Acid Volatile Sulphide(AVS)
"Diffusion Method for theDetermination of Acid-Volatile Sulphidein Sediment" H Brouwer & T.P. Murphy,Env. Toxicology & Chemistry, Vol 13,No. 8, pp 1273-1275, 1994
1 mg/kg
Nitrate-Nitrogen(NO3-N)
APHA 4500 NO3-N E and 4500-NO2- B 1 mg/kg
Microtox Microtox operating Manual - SalineExtract & Solid Phase Test
N/A
Chromium USEPA 6020A 8 mg/kg
Cadmium USEPA 6020A 0.2 mg/kgCopper USEPA 6020A 7 mg/kgMercury USEPA 6020A 0.05 mg/kgNickel USEPA 6020A 4 mg/kgLead USEPA 6020A 8 mg/kgSilver USEPA 6020A 0.1 mg/kgZinc USEPA 6020A 20 mg/kgArsenic USEPA 6020A 1 mg/kgChromium(in interstititial water)
W/DIG/RAR & M/ICP-MS 1 g/L
Copper(in interstititial water)
W/DIG/RAR & M/ICP-MS 1 g/L
Zinc
(in interstititial water)
W/DIG/RAR & M/ICP-MS 10 g/L
Total Organic Carbon(TOC)
APHA 5310B 0.05 % w/w
Low Molecular WeightPAHs
USEPA 8270C 55 g/kg
High Molecular WeightPAHs
USEPA 8270C 170 g/kg
Total PCBs USEPA 8270C 2 g/kg
Tributyltin UNEP/IOC/IAEA 0.015 g/L
Amphipod Test USEPA 1994 N/A
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
19/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
Parameters Determination MethodDetection
Limit
Polychaete Test PSEP 1995 N/A
Bivalve Test PSEP 1995 N/A
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
20/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
APPENDIX D
TABULATED SUMMA RY OF MO NITOR ING RESULTS
8/8/2019 KTAC BSQR2004-05
21/21
Maintenance Dredging (2005-08) November 2005
Contract No. CV/2004/05
CHEC-OWT Joint Venture BSQR
APPENDIX E
LABORA TORY AN ALYTICAL REPORTS