62
153 F I N A L R E P O R T BIBLIOGRAPHY Comptroller General of the United States. Executive guide: improving mission performance through strategic information management and technology - learning from leading organizations. Washington (DC): General Accounting Office; May 1994. Conference Board of Canada. Crown corporations governance forum: issues paper. Ottawa (ON): The Board; November 3, 1995. Conner C. Canadian directorship practices in 1995: a new era in corporate governance. Ottawa (ON): The Conference Board of Canada. 1995. Evans D. Public service sector reform: accountability and performance management. Its relevance and applicability to the Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. [Contract research for the Royal Commission on Workers Compensation in British Columbia]. [Unpublished; May 30, 1997]. KPMG. Corporate governance: a survey of governance disclosures by TSE 300 companies. [s.l.]: KPGM; 1997. Longair J. Choosing the Board of Directors for the 90. Ottawa (ON): The Conference Board of Canada; March 1992. Martin JK. Performance oriented regulatory programs: a way to modernize regulatory systems. The Journal of Public Sector Management 1995- 96;Winter:3-10. Meredith, WR. Final report on laws relating to the liability of employers. Toronto (ON): L.K. Cameron; 1913. Nagel FK, Cutt J, Collins V. Strategic management, accountability and performance measurement in a provincial government organization: a review of the approach and experience of the British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Highways. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria, Centre for Public Sector Studies; 1995. Perrin, Thorau and Associates Ltd. Comparative review of workers compensation systems and governance models: final report update. [Contract research for the Royal Commission on Workers Compensation in British Columbia]. [Unpublished; January 1998]. OCallaghan P, Korbin J, Miller D. The Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia Board governance review: report and recommendations. Victoria (BC): Ministry of Skills, Training and Labour; April 18, 1995. Report of the Standing Senate Committee on banking, trade and commerce, corporate governance. Canada: Standing Senate Committees; August 1996.

KPMG. Corporate governance: a survey of governance ... · Improving board effectiveness by evaluating director ... the Ministry of Environment Lands and Parks, Nov.24, 1995. Rak v

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

153F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Comptroller General of the United States. Executive guide: improving missionperformance through strategic information management and technology -learning from leading organizations. Washington (DC): General AccountingOffice; May 1994.

Conference Board of Canada. Crown corporations governance forum: issuespaper. Ottawa (ON): The Board; November 3, 1995.

Conner C. Canadian directorship practices in 1995: a new era in corporategovernance. Ottawa (ON): The Conference Board of Canada. 1995.

Evans D. Public service sector reform: accountability and performancemanagement. Its relevance and applicability to the Workers�Compensation Board of British Columbia. [Contract research for the RoyalCommission on Workers� Compensation in British Columbia].[Unpublished; May 30, 1997].

KPMG. Corporate governance: a survey of governance disclosures by TSE 300companies. [s.l.]: KPGM; 1997.

Longair J. Choosing the Board of Directors for the �90. Ottawa (ON): TheConference Board of Canada; March 1992.

Martin JK. Performance oriented regulatory programs: a way to modernizeregulatory systems. The Journal of Public Sector Management 1995-96;Winter:3-10.

Meredith, WR. Final report on laws relating to the liability of employers.Toronto (ON): L.K. Cameron; 1913.

Nagel FK, Cutt J, Collins V. Strategic management, accountability andperformance measurement in a provincial government organization: areview of the approach and experience of the British Columbia Ministry ofTransportation and Highways. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria, Centrefor Public Sector Studies; 1995.

Perrin, Thorau and Associates Ltd. Comparative review of workers�compensation systems and governance models: final report update.[Contract research for the Royal Commission on Workers� Compensationin British Columbia]. [Unpublished; January 1998].

O�Callaghan P, Korbin J, Miller D. The Workers� Compensation Board of BritishColumbia Board governance review: report and recommendations. Victoria(BC): Ministry of Skills, Training and Labour; April 18, 1995.

Report of the Standing Senate Committee on banking, trade and commerce,corporate governance. Canada: Standing Senate Committees; August1996.

154

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Thain DH, Leighton DSR. Improving board effectiveness by evaluating directorperformance. Business Quarterly 1992;Autumn.

Thain DH, Leighton DSR. Why boards fail. Business Quarterly 1995:Spring.

Tierney CE. Auditing government controls. Public Fund Digest 1997;8(1).

Toronto Stock Exchange Committee on Corporate Governance. Where werethe directors? Guidelines for improved corporate governance in Canada.Toronto (ON): Toronto Stock Exchange; May 1994.

155F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETYIN CANADIAN JURISDICTIONS

OVERVIEW REPORT: COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF OCCUPATIONALHEALTH AND SAFETY IN CANADIAN JURISDICTIONS

Submitted by

Perrin, Thorau and Associates Ltd.

Kim Thorau

REFERENCES

Material on Canadian occupational health and safety regimes was compiledfrom interviews conducted with representatives from the 12 jurisdictions.Background materials were provided by those jurisdictions.

156

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

ISSUE RESEARCH: COMPENSATION SERVICES, ADJUDICATIONAND THE APPEAL PROCESS IN CANADIAN WORKERS�COMPENSATION SYSTEMS

Submitted by

Perrin, Thorau & Associates Ltd.

REFERENCES

Acts, Policy Decision, Regulations, Statutes

Workers� Compensation Act, R.S.A. 1984, cW-16.

Workers� Compensation Act, C.C.S.M. 1987, c.W-200.

General Articles

Alberta. Appeals Commission. Annual report 1996. Edmonton (AB): TheCommission; 1996.

Alberta. Appeals Commission. Annual report 1997. Edmonton (AB): TheCommission; 1997.

Alberta. Appeals Commission. Workers� Compensation Act: rules ofprocedure. Edmonton (AB): The Commission; [s.a.].

Manitoba. Appeal Commission. 1997 annual report. Winnipeg (MA): TheCommission; 1997.

New Brunswick. Workplace Health, Safety, and Compensation Commission.1997 annual report. Saint John (NB): The Commission; 1997.

New Brunswick. Workplace Health, Safety, and Compensation Commission.1997 statistical supplement to annual report. Saint John (NB): TheCommission; 1997.

Ontario. Workers� Compensation Appeals Tribunal. Annual report 1995. Toronto(ON): The Tribunal; 1995.

Ontario. Workers� Compensation Appeals Tribunal. Annual report 1995. Toronto(ON): The Tribunal; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of Manitoba. 1997 annual report. Winnipeg(MA): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of Nova Scotia. 1996 annual report. Halifax(NS): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of Ontario. 1996 annual report: statisticalsupplement. Toronto (ON): The Board; 1996.

157F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

ANALYSIS OF THE COMMISSION�S PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS: THEMEPAPERS

and

ANALYSIS OF THE COMMISSION�S PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS: ISSUESMATRIX

Submitted by

Praxis Inc.

REFERENCES

Public submissions received by the commission were analyzed to generate thesepapers.

158

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

THE COHORT PROJECT REPORT: A LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS OFNEW CLAIMS REGISTERED WITH THE WCB OF BC 1994 � 1996

Submitted by

Ryan, Karen

REFERENCE

Hunt HA, Barth PS, Leahy, MJ. The workers� compensation system of BritishColumbia: still in transition. Richmond (BC): Workers� Compensation Boardof British Columbia; 1996.

Compilation of data from Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia, andthe Workers� Compensation Review Board.

159F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

APPEALS FROM WCB CLAIMS ADJUDICATION: SCOPE OFPROJECT AND SUMMARY OF RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Submitted by

Samuels, Sharon

REFERENCES

Acts, Policy Decisions, Regulations, Statutes

An Act Respecting Police Organization and Amending the Police Act andVarious Legislation, 5.Q., 1988, c.75, as amended.

Bylaw No.4, Decision #86, replacing Decision No.3 of the Governors.[Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia].

Decision No. 7 of the Governors, 7 WCR 27, 1991 June 21. [Workers�Compensation Board of British Columbia].

Decision No.75 of the Governors, December 1994, 10 WCR 753, 757.[Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia].

Decision No. 368 of the Commissioners, 1983. [Workers� CompensationBoard of British Columbia].

Decision No. 371 of the Commissioners, 1983. [Workers� CompensationBoard of British Columbia].

Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.165.

The Law Enforcement Review Act, R.S.M. 1987. c.L75, s.17(1).

Regulation re Review of Old Disability Pensions, BC Reg. 530/82.

Reports of Injuries Regulation, BC Reg. 713173.

Workers� Compensation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.492.

Workers Compensation Act (Review Board) Regulation, BC Reg. 32/86.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Resolutions of theGovernors, Decision No.8. Workers� Compensation Reporter 1992Jan;7:171.

Cases Reviewed

Ainsley Financial Corp. v. Ontario Securities Commission (1993) 14 OR (3d)280, affirmed (1994) OR (3d) 104 (CA) at p. 110.

Consolidated-Bathurst Packaging Ltd. v. International Woodworkers ofAmerica, Local 2-69 (1990), 68 DLR (4th) 524 (SCC).

Domtar v. Quebec Commission D�Appeal an Matiere de LesionsProfessionelles (1994), 15 Admin LR 1 (Mme. L�Heureux Dubé).

160

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Glad Day Bookshop v. Deputy Minister of National Revenue (1992) 6 AdminL.R. (2nd) 256 (Ont Gen Div).

Hyrciuk v. Ontario (Lieutenant Governor) (1994), 26 Admin L.R. (2nd) 271 (OntDiv.Ct.).

Murray Mollard for the BCCLA, Submission of the Intervenor in the Matter of aRequest for a Review between Western Canada Wilderness Committee andthe Ministry of Environment Lands and Parks, Nov.24, 1995.

Rak v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Brokers) (1990), 47 Admin L.R. 243(BCCA).

Re BC (AG) and Winter et al (1982), 136 DLR (3d) 189 (BCSC).

Re Brennan and Ont. (Minister of Municipal Affairs) (1987), 59 O.R. (2nd) 526(Div Ct).

Re Matheson and College of Nurses (Ont) (1979), 107 DLR (3d) 430 (Ont DivCt), affirmed (1980), 28 OR (2d) 611 (CA).

Re Napoli and WCB (1981), 121 DLR (3d) 301 (BCSC); 126 DLR (3d) 179(BCCA).

Regie des Alcools, [1996] SCJ No.112.

Services Sanitaires R.S. Inc. et autres c. Tribunal du Travail et autres (1987), 9QAC 66; Elliott v. Man. (Director of Social Services) (1982), 17 Man R. (2nd)350 (CA).

Tremblay v. Quebec, (1992), 90 DLR (4th) 609 (SCC) at p.621.

Valente v. The Queen [1985] 2 SCR 673; 24 DLR 4th 161.

Vinogradov v. University of Calgary (1990), 74 DLR (4th) 110 (Alta CA), leave toappeal to SCC refused March 14, 1991.

Ward v. PEI (Workers� Compensation Board) (1984), 51 Nfld & PEIR 28 (PEISC.

General Articles

Association of Workers� Compensation Boards of Canada. Comparison ofCanadian and United States workers� compensation systems. Edmonton(AB): The Association; 1993.

Black�s law dictionary. 6th ed. St. Paul (MN): West Publishing; 1990.

Blake S. Administrative law in Canada. Toronto (ON): Butterworths; 1992.

Brake W. First backlog report to the Chairman and the Board of Governors.Richmond (BC): Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia; 1994.

British Columbia. Office of the Ombudsman. Ombudsreport 1995: annualreport of the Ombudsman. Victoria (BC): The Office; 1995.

161F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

British Columbia. Office of the Ombudsman. Ombudsreport 1997: annualreport of the Ombudsman. Victoria (BC): The Office; 1997.

British Columbia. Office of the Ombudsman. Workers� compensation systemstudy. Victoria (BC): The Office; July 1987. Report No.: 7.

Canadian Bar Association. Report of the Canadian Bar Association: Task Forceon The Independence of Federal Administrative Tribunals and Agencies inCanada. A law for the future fund project. [s.l.].: The Association; 1990.

Canadian encyclopedic digest. 3rd ed. Vol.1. Toronto (ON): Carswell; 1996. P. 271.

Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice. Independence,accountability and government agencies. [Background paper, prepared forthe February 28th, 1997 roundtable discussion on Tribunal Independenceand Accountability in Toronto]. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; 1997.

Clark NH, Connell I, Sandy JT, Jenkins LC, Green H. Minutes of the MRPAdvisory Committee. Richmond (BC): Workers� Compensation Board ofBritish Columbia; December 21, 1992.

Coles concise English dictionary. Toronto (ON): Coles; 1979.

Flaherty D. An investigation into the practices of the WCB of BC with respectto disclosing personal information about injured workers to employers.Victoria (BC): Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner ofBritish Columbia; March 31, 1996. Investigation Report P96-006.

Gallagher G. Medical Review Panel system: time delays in the processing ofMRP applications. A 1996 perspective. Prepared for the Panel ofAdministrators of the WCB. Richmond (BC): Workers� CompensationBoard of British Columbia; May 1996.

Interpretation of Sections 58 through 65. Memo To David Martin from LaurelCourtney, Barrister & Solicitor, Legal Services. [Dated 1997 May 7].

Ison TG. Workers� compensation law in Canada. Toronto (ON): Butterworths;1989.

Jenkins LC. The Medical Review Panel report: a review of the administrative,policy and procedural functions of the MRP process, with identification ofissues and recommendations. Richmond (BC); Workers� CompensationBoard of British Columbia; August 17, 1992.

Karton M. Law policy and adjudication at the Workers Compensation Board ofB.C. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; December 1997.

Kobayashi C. re Appeal processes [presentation notes]. Appeal Division ChiefAppeal Commissioner Cassandra Kobayashi. Presentation by WCB; 1998Mar 6. [Unpublished].

162

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Laurel Courtney, Barrister and Solicitor, Legal Services. Re: Interpretation ofSections 58 through 65. [Memorandum] to David Martin, Registrar, MedicalReview Panel. [Dated 1997 May 7]. P. 4.

Lott M, MacLean M, Bluman B. Professional legal training course: practicematerials. Vancouver (BC): Continuing Legal Education Society of B.C.;1996-97.

Macauley RW. Practice and procedure before administrative tribunals. Toronto(ON: Carswell; 1997.

Macauley RW, Sprague JLH. Hearings before administrative tribunals. Toronto(ON): Carswell; 1996.

Meredith W. The Workmen�s Compensation Act with reports on laws relatingto the liability of employers. Toronto (ON): King�s Printer; 1913.

Mollard M. Submission of the intervenor in the matter of a request for a reviewbetween Western Canada Wilderness Committee and the Ministry ofEnvironment Lands and Parks. Vancouver (BC): B.C. Civil LibertiesAssociation; November 24, 1995.

Oppal WT. Closing the gap: policing and the community. Policing in B.C.Commission of Inquiry final report. Victoria (BC): Queen�s Printer; 1994.

Perrin, Thorau & Associates Ltd. Comparative review of workers� compensationsystems and governance models: first draft. [Unpublished; May 23, 1997].

Pineo AV. Report of the Committee of Investigation on Workmen�sCompensation Laws. Victoria (BC): King�s Printer; 1916.

Rankin M. Issues of independence. Paper presented to the Canadian Institutefor the Administration of Justice Seminar for Administrative Tribunals.Vancouver (BC); [s.n.]: March 23, 1990.

Report and recommendations to the Minister of Labour and ConsumerServices by the Advisory Committee on the Structures of the Workers�Compensation System of British Columbia. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; 1988. The MunroeReport: 8 WCR 231.

Sloan G. Report of the Commission Relating to the Workmens� CompensationBoard. Victoria (BC): Queen�s Printer; 1942.

Statsky W. West�s legal dictionary. St. Paul (MN): West Publishing; 1992.

Tysoe CW. Commission of Inquiry Workmen�s Compensation: Report of theCommission. Victoria (BC): Queen�s Printer; 1966.

Weltz A. Principles and definitions: an historical dialectic of public policy goals:draft. [In house research report for the Royal Commission on Workers�Compensation in British Columbia]. [Unpublished; July 23, 1997].

163F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Annual report of theAppeal Division 1993. Workers� Compensation Reporter 1993;11:165.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Annual report of theAppeal Division 1994. Workers� Compensation Reporter 1994;11:393.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Annual report of theAppeal Division 1995. Workers� Compensation Reporter 1995;12:143.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Annual report of theAppeal Division 1996. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Annual report of theAppeal Division 1997. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. The Appeal Division.Appeals Officers - procedures manual: draft. Richmond (BC): The Board;[s.a.].

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Appeal Divisioncommunity feedback report. Workers� Compensation Reporter 1994;11:93.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Appeal Division Decision#1, May 29, 1991. Workers� Compensation Reporter 1991;7:33.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Appeal Division Decision#3, July 3, 1991. Workers� Compensation Reporter 1991;7:65.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Appeal Division Decision#4, Aug 8, 1991. Workers� Compensation Reporter 1991;7:79.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Appeal Division Decision#5, Jan 6, 1992. Workers� Compensation Reporter 1992;8:23.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Appeal Division Decision#93-0740, May 25, 1993. Workers� Compensation Reporter 1993;10:127.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Appeal Division Decision#93-1186, Aug 20, 1993. Workers� Compensation Reporter 1993;10:43.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Appeal Division Decision#12, Apr. 11, 1994. Workers� Compensation Reporter 1994;10:365.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Appeal DivisionOperational Status Report, 1996 Dec 6. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation ServicesDivision. Field investigations procedure manual. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1993.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Medical Appeals Officerprocedure manual. Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

164

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Medical Review PanelDepartment. 1994 annual report to the panel of administrators. Richmond(BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Medical Review PanelDepartment. 1996 annual report to the panel of administrators. Richmond(BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Medical Review PanelDepartment. 1998 business plan. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Office of the WCBOmbudsman. When you feel you�ve been treated unfairly. Richmond (BC):The Office; January 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Office of the WCBOmbudsman. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation Services andclaims manual. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Review Board. Chair�s annual report. Richmond (BC):Workers� Compensation Review Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Review Board. Chair�s annual report. Richmond (BC):Workers� Compensation Review Board; 1997.

Workers Compensation of British Columbia. Review Board policy & proceduremanual. Partially updated to 1995 May second half current to 1991.Richmond (BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Statement of the duties ofthe Panel of Administrators, adopted as a resolution of the Panel ofAdministrators, 1997 Jan 14. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Websites

British Columbia. Office of the Ombudsman. Promoting fairness for BritishColumbians: guiding principles. [article online] No date [cited 1998 Jun 2].Available from: http://www.ombud.gov.bc.ca/about_ombudsman/index.html

E-file: the electronic claim file. A new way of thinking. A new way of working.Improving Compensation Services for workers and employers [articleonline] 1996 [cited 1998]. Available from: http://www.wcb.bc.ca.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Policy and RegulationDevelopment Bureau. An overview of the historical development andcurrent structure of the Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia:a briefing paper [article online] 1996 [cited 1998]. Available from: http://www.wcb.bc.ca.

165F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Policy and RegulationDevelopment Bureau. Disclosure of Board files: access and privacyissues: a briefing paper [article online] 1996 [cited 1998]. Available from:http://www.wcb.bc.ca.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Policy and RegulationDevelopment Bureau. Governance: a briefing paper. [article online] 1997Apr 7 [cited 1998]. Available from: http://www.wcb.bc.ca.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Policy and RegulationDevelopment Bureau. Regulation review and development process: abriefing paper. [article online] 1997 May 26 [cited 1998]. Available from:http://www.wcb.bc.ca.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Policy and RegulationDevelopment Bureau. Workers� compensation appeal system: a briefingpaper. [article online] 1997 Jul 31 [cited 1998]. Available from: http://www.wcb.bc.ca.

166

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE INVENTORIES

Submitted by

Semmens & Adams Management and Economic Counsel

Semmens, Ted and Peter Adams

REFERENCES

General Articles

American Evaluation Association. Guiding Principles for evaluators. In: ShadishWR, Newman DL, Scheirer MA, and Wye C, editors. Guiding principles forevaluators. No. 66. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; Summer 1996;Chapter 2.

Canadian Comprehensive Auditing Foundation, Accountability, performancereporting, comprehensive audit - an integrated perspective. Ottawa(ON):CCAF � FCVI Inc; 1996.

Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. Planning value-for-moneyaudits:1990, guideline 1.

Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. Value-for-money auditingstandards. March 1988.

Caudle SL. Using qualitative approaches. In: Wholey JS, Hatry HP, andNewcomer KE, editors. Handbook of practical program evaluation. SanFrancisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1994.

Fulton J, Atkinson J. Medical and rehabilitation programs in workers�compensation: an administrative inventory in British Columbia. [s.l.]: [s.n.];May 1993.

Effectiveness reporting and auditing in the public sector: supporting researchStudies. General literature survey project. Ottawa (ON): CCAF; 1988.

Hunt HA. Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia: AssessmentDepartment administrative inventory. Kalamazoo (MI): W.E. Upjohn Institutefor Employment Research; 1992.

Hunt HA, Barth PS, and Leahy MJ. Workers� compensation in British Columbia:an administrative inventory at a time of transition. Kalamazoo (MI): W.E.Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; 1991.

Hunt HA, Barth PS, and Leahy MJ. The workers� compensation system ofBritish Columbia: still in transition. (Kalamazoo (MI): W.E. Upjohn Institutefor Employment Research; 1995.

167F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Jenkins L. Medical Review Panel. Report and highlights of the MedicalReview Panel report. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; Aug 1992.

Office of the Comptroller General of Canada. Coleman JS. Policy research inthe social sciences. Morristown (NJ): General Learning Press; 1972.

Office of the Comptroller General of Canada. Program evaluation methods:measurement and attribution of program results Ottawa (ON): ProgramEvaluation Branch, Office of the Comptroller General; 1990.

Office of the Comptroller General of Canada. Working standards for theevaluation of programs in federal departments and agencies. Ottawa (ON):Ministry of Supply and Services; 1989.

Rest KM, Ashford NA. Occupational safety and health in British Columbia: anadministrative inventory. Cambridge (MA): Ashford & Associates; 1992.

Rest KM, Ashford NA. Occupational health and safety in British Columbia: anadministrative inventory of the prevention activities of the Workers�Compensation Board. Cambridge, MA: Ashford Associates; 1997.

United States General Accounting Office. Government auditing standards:standards for audit of governmental organisations, programs, activitiesand functions. Washington (DC): U.S. General Accounting Office; 1988.

168

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

THE FLOW OF GOVERNANCE INFORMATION IN THE BRITISHCOLUMBIA WORKERS� COMPENSATION SYSTEM

Submitted by

Semmens & Adams Management and Economic Counsel

Semmens, Ted

REFERENCES

General Articles

Auditor General of British Columbia. Deputy Ministers� Council. Enhancingaccountability for performance: a framework and an implementation plan.Victoria (BC): The Council; 1996.

The Canadian Comprehensive Auditing Foundation (CCAF). In search ofeffective governance. Ottawa (ON): The CCAF; 1994.

Canadian Comprehensive Auditing Foundation (CCAF). Governanceinformation-strategies for success. CCAF; 1996.

The Canadian Comprehensive Auditing Foundation (CCAF). Information - thecurrency of corporate governance. CCAF; 1997.

Toronto Stock Exchange. Report of the Dey Committee on CorporateGovernance in Canada. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; 1994.

Fulfilling the need to know. University of Western Ontario�s Business Quarterly1997 Spring.

169F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

INTERCONNECTEDNESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY: THE BCWORKERS� COMPENSATION SYSTEM AMONG THE SET OF SOCIALPROGRAMS

Submitted by

Social Research and Demonstration Corporation

Schwartz, Saul

Theresa Jennissen and Michael Prince

REFERENCES

General Articles

Aaronson J. Dutiful daughters and undemanding mothers: contrastingimages of giving and receiving care in middle and later life. In: Baines C,Evans P, Neysmith S, editors. Women�s caring: feminist perspectives onsocial welfare. Toronto (ON): McClelland and Stewart; 1991. P.138-68.

Aarts LJM, Burkhauser RV, De Jong PR. Curing the Dutch disease: aninternational perspective on disability policy reform. Aldershot, England,Brookfield USA: Avebury; 1996.

Aarts LJM, De Jong PR. The Dutch disability program and how it grew. In:Aarts LJM, Burkhauser RV, De Jong PR, editors. Curing the Dutch disease:an international perspective on disability policy reform. Aldershot,England, Brookfield, USA: Avebury; 1996.

Beckwith G. The myth of injury prevention incentives in workers�compensation insurance. New Solutions 1992 Winter:52-73.

Berger E, editor. The Canadian Health Monitor 1998 April 8.

British Columbia. Office of the Auditor-General. Enhancing accountability forperformance in the British Columbia public sector. Victoria (BC): TheOffice; 1995.

British Columbia, Office of the Auditor-General. Deputy Ministers� Council.Enhancing accountability for performance in the British Columbia publicsector: a progress report to the Legislative Assembly. Victoria (BC): TheOffice; 1997

Brophy J. Compensation and occupational disease. New Solutions 1995Fall:3-11.

Brophy J. Submission to the Royal Commission on Workers� Compensation.Windsor 1995 Feb.

170

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Butler RJ, Johnson WG, Baldwin ML. Managing work disability: why firstreturn to work is not a measure of success. Industrial and Labor RelationsReview 1995;48:452-69

Canada. Report of the Royal Commission on the Relations of Labour andCapital. Ottawa (ON): King�s Printer; 1889.

Canada. Human Resources Development. Basic facts on social securityprograms. Ottawa (ON): Supply and Services Canada; 1994.

Canada. Human Resources Development. CPP, phase II disability benefits,background paper. Literature review on public disability insuranceprograms. Ottawa (ON): HRDC; March 1996.

Canada. Human Resources Development. Federal-Provincial Territorial WorkingGroup on Benefits and Services for Persons with Disabilities. Programs andmeasures: a coverage analysis, part 1. Inventory of federal and provincialprograms and measures, part 3. Ottawa (ON): Human ResourcesDevelopment Canada, 1997.

Canada. Statistics Canada. Work injuries 1992-1994. Ottawa (ON): StatisticsCanada; December 1995.

Canada. Veterans Affairs. Veteran services and benefits. Ottawa (ON): Ministerof Public Works and Government Services Canada; March 1996.

Card D, McCall BP. Is workers� compensation covering uninsured medicalcosts? Evidence from the �Monday effect.� Industrial and Labor RelationsReview 1996; 49(4).

Dembe AE. The history of carpal tunnel syndrome. New Solutions 1997Spring:15-22.

Dungan P. The effect of workers� compensation and other payroll taxes on themacro economies of Canada and Ontario [mimeograph]. [s.l.]: [s.l.]; 1997.

Ehrenberg RG. Workers� compensation, wages and the risk of injury. In: BurtonJF, editor. New perspectives in workers� compensation. Ithaca (NY): ILRPress; 1988.

Fortin B, Lanoie P. Substitution between unemployment insurance andworkers� compensation. Journal of Public Economics 1992;49:287-312.

Gunderson M, Hyatt D. Inter-generational considerations of workers�compensation unfunded liabilities [Mimeograph]. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; 1997.

Hyatt DE. Work disincentives of workers� compensation permanent partialdisability benefits: evidence for Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics1996;29(2).

171F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hess M. The Canadian fact book on income security programs. Ottawa/Montreal: Canadian Council on Social Development; 1992.

Ison TG. Compensation systems for injury and disease: the policy choices.Toronto (ON): Butterworths; 1994

Jennissen T. The development of workmen�s compensation in Ontario.Canadian Journal of Social Work Education 1981; 7(1): 55-71.

Johnson WG, Ondrich J. The duration of post-injury absences from work. TheReview of Economics and Statistics 1990;72.

Kraut A. Estimates of the extent of morbidity and mortality due tooccupational diseases in Canada. American Journal of Industrial Medicine1994;25:267-78

Krueger A. Incentive effects of workers� compensation insurance. Journal ofPublic Economics 1990; 41:73-99.

Lampman RJ, Hutchens R. The future of workers� compensation. In:Burton,JF, [editor.] New Perspectives in Workers� Compensation. Ithaca:ILR Press; 1988.

Landsbergis PA, Schurman SJ, Israel B, Schnall PL, Hugentobler MK, Cahill J,Baker D. Job stress and heart disease: evidence and strategies forprevention. New Solutions 1993 Summer:42-58.

Lax M. Occupational disease: addressing the problem of under-diagnosis.New Solutions 1996 Summer:81-92

Lero D, Johnson K. 110 Canadian statistics on work and family. Ottawa (ON):The Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women; 1994.

Lessin N. Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Occupational Safetyand Health Administration, Testimony before the Subcommittee on PublicHealth and Safety, Senate Committee on Labour and Human Resource;1997 July 10; Washington, DC; 1997.

Lessin N. Workers need real rights to counter push for production. [s.l.]: [s.n.];[s.a.].

Leyton E. Dying hard: the ravages of industrial carnage. Toronto (ON): OxfordUniversity Press; 1997.

Lowe G. Women, paid/unpaid work, and stress. Ottawa (ON): CanadianAdvisory Council on the Status of Women; 1989.

McBrearty L, King A, Sobel D. Workers� compensation: a submission toOntario�s Royal Commission on Workers� Compensation, June 1995. NewSolutions 1996:13-24.

172

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Messing K. Occupational safety and health concerns of Canadian women: abackground paper. Ottawa (ON): Women�s Bureau of Labour Canada; 1991.

Messing K, Courville J, Venzina N. Minimizing risks for women in non-traditional jobs. New Solutions 1991 Spring:66-71.

Messing K, Neis B, Dumais L. Invisible issues in women�s occupational health.Charlottetown: Gynergy Books 1995.

Mogensen VL (1996) Office Politics: Computers, Labor and the Right for Safetyand Health, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press; 1996.

Montgomery J. Occupational health and safety. Scarborough: Nelson CanadaLimited; 1996.

Ontario Federation of Labour. Occupational health and safety: a trainingmanual. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman; 1982.

Perrin, Thorau & Associates Ltd. Comparative review of workers� compensationsystems and governance models: final report update. [Prepared for theRoyal Commission on Workers� Compensation in BC]. [Unpublished; 1998].

Prince MJ. At the edge of Canada�s welfare state: social policy-making inBritish Columbia. In: Carty RK, [editor]. Politics, policy and government inBritish Columbia. Vancouver (BC): University of British Columbia Press;1996.

Ritzen A, Rosenstock L. The misuse of epidemiology and apportionment incompensation for occupational disease. New Solutions 1993 Spring:29-36.

Seifert A, Messing K, Dumais L. Star wars and strategic defence initiatives:work activity and health symptoms of unionised bank tellers during workreorganization. International Journal of Health Services 1997;27(3):455-477.

Smith RS. Mostly on Mondays: is workers� compensation covering off-the-jobinjuries. In: Borba PS, Appel D, [editors]. Benefits, costs and cycles inworkers� compensation. Boston (MA): Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1989.

Tarasuk V, Eakin JE. The problem of legitimacy in the experience of work-related back injury. Qualitative Health Research 1995 May;5(2):204-21.

Vaillancourt F, Marceau N. Do general and firm-specific employer payroll taxeshave the same incidence. Economics Letters 1990:175-181.

173F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

COMPENSATION SERVICES PROGRAM OVERVIEW

Submitted by

Tindall, Diana

REFERENCES

Acts, Policy Decisions, Regulations, Statutes

Workers� Compensation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.492.

General Articles

Hunt HA, Barth PF, Leahy MJ. The workers� compensation system of BritishColumbia: still in transition. Kalamazoo (MI): W.E. Upjohn Institute forEmployment Research; March 21, 1996.

Hunt HA, Barth PF, Leahy MJ. Workers� compensation in British Columbia:administrative inventory at a time of transition. Kalamazoo (MI): W.E.Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; November 1991.

Memorandum from Jillian McCabe, March 21, 1997

O�Brien PM. The chair�s annual report 1995 of the Workers� CompensationReview Board. Richmond (BC): Workers� Compensation Review Board;1995.

Rydberg Levy Group, Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia.Performance management report for the period Apr. �95 - Dec. �96.Richmond (BC): Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia; 1997.

Samuel S, Ryan K, Pope S. Claims adjudication and appeals: first & secondset of flowcharts. [In house research report for the Royal Commission onWorkers� Compensation in British Columbia]. [Unpublished; January 1998].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. 1998 corporate businessplan. Richmond (BC): The Board; December 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Annual report 1996:building on common ground. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Annual report 1997.Richmond (BC): The Board; 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Claims adjudicationhandbook. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services�performance report: November 1997.

174

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation services andclaims manual. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. WCB presentation to theRoyal Commission on Compensation Services. [Unpublished].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation ServicesDivision. 8-week rate review: discussion paper. Richmond (BC): The Board;1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation ServicesDivision. Claims management and the continuum of care, June 16, 1997. In:Compensation Services Division practice directives. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; November 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal Audit & Evaluation.Vocational rehabilitation interventions evaluation study (back injury claims).Richmond (BC): The Board; September 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Policy and RegulationDevelopment Bureau. Benefit stacking and integration: a briefing paper.Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Policy and RegulationDevelopment Bureau. Compensation rate: a briefing paper. Richmond (BC):The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Policy and RegulationDevelopment Bureau. Permanent disability pensions: a briefing paper.Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Policy and ResearchDepartment. Manager review: draft. Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation andCompensation Services Division 1997 business plan. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation andCompensation Services Division 1998 business plan. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation andCompensation Services Division. Health Care Services Management Team.Transforming health care delivery to injured workers: a framework forbusiness process redesign. Richmond (BC): The Board; January 1988.

175F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

TERMS OF REFERENCE ITEM 3(C) RELATING TOREHABILITATION AND REEMPLOYMENT MATTERS

Submitted by

Wallbank, Rosemary,

Sylvia Robinson, Shannon Turner,

Nancy Cameron and John Sehmer

REFERENCES

Acts, Policy Decisions, Regulations, Statutes

California. AB 237 workers� compensation: vocational rehabilitation services:fees (an Act to add Section 139.5 and 4644 of the Labor Code, relating toworkers� compensation). [article online] 1997 [cited 1997 Nov 14]: [6screens]. Available from: http://www.sen.ca.gov/htbin/ca-htm.

Connecticut Workers� Compensation. Administrative regulations. [s.l.]: TheBoard; [s.a.].

Occupational Health and Safety (Commonwealth Employment) Act 1991[Australia]. [article online] 1997 [cited 1997 Sep 18]: [67 screens]. Availablefrom: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ohasea19911531/.

Ontario Workers� Compensation Board. Vocational rehabilitation: Bill 165amendments to the Workers� Compensation Act. [article online] 1995[cited 1998 Jan 9]: [2 screens]. Available from: http://www.wcb.on.ca/wcb/wcb.nsf/public.

WorkCover Queensland. WorkCover Queensland Act 1996 (Act No.75 of1996). Brisbane: WorkCover Queensland; 1996.

General Articles

Abt Associates of Canada. Evaluation of the WCB�s vocational rehabilitationinterventions - component 1: final report. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; June 1994.

Abt Associates of Canada. Evaluation of the WCB�s vocational rehabilitationinterventions - volume 1: general summary survey of workers andemployers. Report. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; June 1994.

Abt Associates of Canada. Evaluation of the WCB�s vocational rehabilitationinterventions - volume 2: technical appendix survey of workers andemployers. Report. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; June 1994.

Alabama. Vocational Rehabilitation Service. Community Rehabilitationprograms. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; 1996.

176

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Alaska. Department of Education. Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. Annualreport: 50 years of rehabilitation in Alaska 1946-1996. Anchorage (AL): TheDepartment; 1996.

Alexander Holburn, Beaudin & Lang. Understanding the legal implications ofaccommodation of disabled employees in the workplace. Vancouver (BC):[s.n.]; June 1996.

Alley H. Memorandum to ODS Officers re: Preventative Rehab.

Allingham R, Hyatt D. Measuring the impact of vocational rehabilitation on theprobability of post-injury return to work. In: Thomason T, Chaykowski RP,editors. Research in Canadian workers� compensation. Kingston (ON): IRCPress; 1995. P. 158-80.

Angus Reid Group. WCB Claimant satisfaction survey: W13. Richmond (BC):Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia; November 1997.

Association of the Workers� Compensation Boards of Canada. Clinical pilotstudy of biopsychosocial measuring instruments. Edmonton (AB): TheAssociation; May 30, 1996. [

Association of Workers� Compensation Boards of Canada. Comparison ofworkers� compensation in Canada. Edmonton (AB): The Association; 1995.

Association of Workers� Compensation Boards of Canada. Compensating forchronic pain 1997. Edmonton (AB): The Association; 1997.

Australia Occupational Health and Safety Commission. Guidance note for thebest practice rehabilitation management of occupational injuries anddisease. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; 1995.

Australian National Audit Office. Comcare Australia. Return to work: a guide toWorkers� Compensation case management. Melbourne: ANAO; December1996.

Bach C, Bach M. Canadian Labour Force Development Board. People withdisabilities in transition in the Canadian labour market. North York (ON): TheRoeher Institute; January 1993. Research report No.: 3.

Ballantyne DS, Dunleavy JF. Workers� compensation in Oregon: administrativeinventory. Portland (OR): Workers� Compensation Research Institute; 1995.

Bell PM. Rehabilitation of disability benefit claimants other than dependency.Employer Benefits Journal 1995 Jun;20(2):23-27.

Berkowitz M. USA/ILO international symposium on returning injured workersto work; 1989 May 9-11; Turin, Italy. Geneva: International LabourOrganization; 1990.

177F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BI directory of providers of rehabilitation services. Business Insurance 1995Oct 9;29(41):59-69.

Birch WF. Accident compensation: a fairer scheme. Wellington (NZ): Office ofthe Ministry of Labour; July 1991.

Blair D, Hurst R. WCB�s Medical and Health Care Services. Presentation to theRoyal Commission: March 2, 1998. [Unpublished].

Blinder AS. Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. TheJournal of Human Resources 1972 Dec;8(4):436-55.

Bogyo T. Memorandum re: moratorium on all business start-ups. 1995 March 2.

British Columbia Council of Human Rights. Human rights and employmentequity: interim policy guidelines. Vancouver (BC): The Council; 1994.

British Columbia. Ministry of Employment and Investment. CrownCorporations Secretariat. Crown corporations 1997/98 estimatesinformation. Victoria (BC): The Ministry; 1994.

British Columbia. Ministry of Employment and Investment. CrownCorporations Secretariat. Enhancing accountability for performance: aframework and an implementation plan. Victoria (BC): The Ministry; [s.a.].

British Columbia. Ministry of Employment and Investment. CrownCorporations Secretariat. Strategic and business plans: slides. Victoria(BC): The Ministry; [s.a.].

British Columbia. Ministry of Labour. Workers� Advisers. Introduction tooccupational diseases: fact sheet. Richmond (BC): Workers� Advisers;February 1997.

British Columbia. Ministry of Labour. Workers� Advisers. Psychological andemotional conditions: fact sheet. Richmond (BC): Workers� Advisers;February 1997.

British Columbia. Ministry of Labour. Workers� Advisers. Rehabilitation andretraining: fact sheet. Richmond (BC): Workers� Advisers; February 1997.

British Columbia. Office of the Auditor General. Deputy Ministers� Council.Accountability reporting review: draft. Victoria (BC): The Office; January1998.

Burton JF, Scmidle TP. Workers� compensation benefits paid to workers: usesand misuses of data. John Burton�s Workers� Compensation Monitor 1993Jul-Aug;6(4).

Butler RJ, Johnson WG, Baldwin ML. Managing work disability: why firstreturn to work is not a measure of success. Industrial and LabourRelations Review 1995 ;48(3):452-69.

178

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

California Commission on Health and Safety and Workers� Compensation.Commission initiates collaborative study of �carve-outs�: alternativeworkers� compensation programs. [Berkley (CA)]: The Commission; January13, 1997.

California Department of Industrial Relations. Workers� compensation reform:3rd anniversary report. Berkley (CA): The Department; [s.a.].

Canada. Human Resources Development. Collective reflection on the changingworkplace: report of the Advisory Committee on the changing workplace.Hull (PQ): Human Resources Development; 1997.

Canada. Human Resources Development. CPP disability benefits [pressrelease]. Ottawa (ON): Ministry of Human Resources Development Canada;January 1998.

Canada. Human Resources Development. Evaluation of the National VocationalRehabilitation Program: phase II - disability benefits. Evaluation report.Ottawa (ON): Ministry of Human Resources Development Canada; October1996.

CARF, Galvin DE. Survey report: accreditation of Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Tucson (AZ): CARF; March 22, 1995.

Changing the way we manage health care. The Communicator 1996 May.

Ches M. Status report on utilization review and Medical Bill audit in non-managed care. [s.l.]: Kentucky Department of Workers Claims; October1997.

The Chiropractic Report. Chapman-Smith D, editor. 1998 Mar;12(2).

Commission de la Sante et de la Securite du Travail. Keeping ties with work fora prompt and lasting return to work. Montreal (PQ): CSST; 1993.

Comparison of workers� compensation arrangements in Australianjurisdictions: compiled for the Secretariat Heads of Workers� CompensationAuthorities. Melbourne: Victorian WorkCover Authority; 1997.

Contemporary concepts in spine care: spine rehabilitation. Austin (TX):University of Texas; [s.a.].

Cotton J. On the decomposition of wage differentials. The Review ofEconomics and Statistics 1986 Aug:236-43.

Coulas D. Operational review of the support services area: draft reportNovember 1995. Submitted to Dr. Bart Jessup and Donna Young. Richmond(BC): Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia; November 1995.

Cox B. Scale quantifies efficacy of rehab for claimants. National Underwriter1994 Aug 29;98(35):21.

179F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Crowe D, Chisolm C, Hartfiel S, Hodgins C, Lang C, Mayoh C, et al. Serviceimprovement strategy: re-designed referral, admission and dischargeprocesses. Prepared for the Leslie R. Peterson Rehabilitation Centre.Richmond (BC): KPMG; September 26, 1996.

CS/Resors Consulting Ltd. Report on the case study component of theevaluation of the WCB�s vocational rehabilitation interventions. [s.l.]: [s.n.];August 12, 1994.

Davidson CJ. Vocational rehabilitation services in workers� compensationprograms: evaluating research model effectiveness. Benefits Quarterly1994;10(4):49-57.

Davies D. The end of clinical freedom. British Medical Journal1983;287(6401):1237-38.

Dean DH, Dean RC. Issues in the economic evaluation of the vocationalrehabilitation program. Journal of Rehabilitation 1987;53(1):13-19.

Dorsey J. Defining worker�s compensation doctoring in the �90�s. Richmond(BC): Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia; [s.a.].

Ellis AW. Teamwork assists return to work efforts. Best�s Review 1994Feb;94(10):58.

Ennis B, Fielder E, Mills D, Buchorn R. Memorandum re: responses tomoratorium on business start-ups. 1995 March.

Fishbain DA, Cutlar RB, Rosomoff H, Khalil T, Abdel-Moty E, Sadek S, et al.�Movement� in work status after pain facility treatment. Spine1996;21(22):2662-69.

Flynn G. Rehab makes good business sense. Personnel Journal 1994Sep;73(9):18-20.

Frazee V. Disability claimants challenge perceived limitations. PersonnelJournal 1996 Apr;75(4):24-26.

Fulton Consulting Group. Comcare Australia. Review of international andjurisdictional best practice in return to work: a report of the Return toWork Advisory Group. Canberra: The Australian Government PublishingService; 1996.

Fulton Consulting Group. Review of international and jurisdictional bestpractice in return to work: a report of the Return to Work Advisory Group.[Research conducted by the Australian National Rehabilitation Policy Unit].[s.l.]: [s.n.]; 1995.

180

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Fulton J, Atkinson J. Medical and rehabilitation programs in workers�compensation: an administrative inventory in British Columbia. Ottawa(ON): The Health Group; 1993.

Gamborg B, Elliott W, Curtis K. Chronic disability syndrome. Richmond (BC):Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia; September 1991.

Gardner JA. Return to work incentives: lessons for policymakers fromeconomic studies.[s.l.]: Workers� Compensation Research Institute; 1989.

Gates L, Taler Y, Akabas SH. Optimizing first return to work among newlydisabled workers: cost containment. Benefits Quarterly 1989;5(2):19-27.

Gates LB, Yecheskel T, Akabas SH. Optimizing return to work among newlydisabled workers: a new approach toward cost containment. BenefitsQuarterly 1989;2:20.

Gettlin RH. Debate heats up on privatizing Social Security Disability. Best�sReview (Life/Health) 1996 Jan;96(9):54-8.

Grover G. British Columbia labour force and employment dynamics: ahistorical review. [Contract research for the Royal Commission on Workers�Compensation in BC]. [Unpublished; January 31, 1998].

Gunderson M, Hyatt D, Law D. Re-employment and accommodationrequirements under workers� compensation. In: Thomason T, ChaykowskiRP, editors. Research in Canadian workers� compensation. Kingston (ON):IRC Press; 1995. P. 141-57.

Habeck RV, Leahy MJ, Hunt HA, Chan F, Welch EM. Employer factors related toworkers� compensation claims and disability management. RehabilitationCounseling Bulletin 1991 Mar;34(3):210.

Harder H. Memorandum re: clarification of business start-up policy. [no date]

Harder H. Memorandum re: use of contractor by rehabilitation consultants.1995 October 24.

Harris K. Defining, measuring, and predicting return to work in Florida. [s.l.]:[s.n.]: [s.a.].

Health Management Resource Group. Current status of the rehabilitationservice delivery system in British Columbia. Victoria (BC): Ministry of Healthand Ministry Responsible for Seniors; 1994.

Hennessey JC, Muller LS. Work efforts of disabled-worker beneficiaries:preliminary findings from the new beneficiary follow-up survey. SocialSecurity Bulletin 1994 Fall;57(3):42-51.

Hrudey WP. Over diagnosis and over treatment of low back pain: long termeffects. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; [s.a.].

181F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hunsley TM. Disability programs: considerations on cost and coordination.Toronto (ON): Institute for Work & Health; December 1996. Occasionalpaper No.:5.

Hunt A, Leahy MJ. Vocational rehabilitation: policy and practice at the WCB ofBritish Columbia: final report dated June 6, 1997; Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1997.

Hunt DG. Multivariate prediction of disability: low back. Phase I: developmentof data collection protocols 1996-1998. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1998.

Hunt DG. Proposed protocol for physical examination in the research study�Multivariate prediction of disability: low back�. Appendix 5. Richmond(BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Hunt HA, Barth PS, Leahy MJ. Workers� Compensation in British Columbia: anadministrative inventory at a time of transition. Kalamazoo (MI): W.E.Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; 1991.

Hunt HA, Barth PS, Leahy MJ. The workers� compensation system in BritishColumbia: still in transition. Kalamazoo (MI): W.E. Upjohn Institute forEmployment Research; 1996.

Institute for Work and Health. Rehabilitation Services inventory and quality.Project phase II report: recommendations and options to improve thequality of Rehabilitation Services in August 1996. Toronto (ON): TheInstitute; [1996].

International Labour Organization. ILO/GLADNET international researchproject on job retention: return to work strategies for disabled workers.Geneva: ILO; [1997].

Ison TG. Compensation systems for injury and disease: the policy choices.Toronto (ON): Butterworths; 1994.

Jackson C. Discussion paper on WCB attacks injured workers� benefits.IAVGO Reporting Service Newsletter 1998 Feb 20;9(1).

Jessup BA. Disability management systems: the past, present and future -presentation to the participants of the Conference �Clinical and costeffectiveness in interdisciplinary pain management�; 1995 Sep 6-8;Vernon, BC; 1995.

Jessup BA.Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. The WCB ofBC continuum of care. Richmond (BC): The Board; June 17, 1997.

Johnson S. Prediction of chronic occupational disability: low back pain.Richmond (BC): Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia; March27, 1995.

182

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Johnson S, Joy P, Schultz I, Hunt D, Yik M. Clinical pilot study of biophysicalmeasuring instruments. Richmond (BC): Workers� Compensation Board ofBritish Columbia; May 30, 1996.

Johnson WG, Baldwin ML, Burton JF. Why is treatment of work related injuriescostly? New evidence from California. Inquiry 1996 Spring;33:53-65.

Johnson WG, Baldwin ML, Marcus SC, Burton JF. The Zenith Project report No.1: the excess costs of health care for work-related injuries. An executivesummary. Phoenix (AZ): Zenith National Insurance Co.; [s.a.].

Johnson WG, Burton JF, Thornquist L, Zaidman B. Why does workers�compensation pay more for health care? Benefits Quarterly 1993;9(4):22-31.

Johnson WG, Butler RJ, Baldwin ML. First spells of work absences amongOntario workers. In: Thomason T, Chaykowski S, editors. Research inCanadian workers� compensation. Toronto (ON): IRC Press; January 1994

Johnson WG, Cullinan PR, Curington WP. The adequacy of workers�compensation benefits. In: Research report of the InterdepartmentalWorkers� Compensation Task Force. Vol. 6. Washington (DC): U.S.Government Printing Office; 1979. P. 95-122

Johnson WG, Curington WP. Wage losses and workers� compensation benefits1970-1980: a report to the State of New York Temporary Commission onWorkers� Compensation and Disability Benefits. Albany (NY): [s.n.]; 1986.

Jones B. Office of the Auditor General of British Columbia. Memorandum toDebra Mills re: rehabilitation expenditures for business start-ups. 1995March 1.

Joy P, Schultz I, Hanson C. Multivariate prediction of disability - low back: anAWCBC funded project. Richmond (BC): Workers� Compensation Board ofBritish Columbia; 1996.

Kapp M. The clinical practice parameters movement: the risk manager�s role.Journal of Healthcare Risk Management 1994 Spring;14(2).

Kiernan WE, Schalock RL, editors. Economics, industry and disability: a lookahead. Baltimore (MD): Paul H. Brookes Publishing; 1989.

[Labor Council of New South Wales]. Inquiry into workers� compensation inNew South Wales: final report. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; September 15, 1997.

Lancaster T. Econometric methods for the duration of unemployment.Econometrica 1979 Jul;47(4):939-56.

Lea GW. Secondary traumatization of work-related rehabilitation clients. ANewsletter for Mental Health Providers [No date].

Leiter V, Wood ML, Bell SH. Case management at work for SSA disabilitybeneficiaries: process results of the Project Network return to workdemonstration. Social Security Bulletin 1997;60(1):29-48.

183F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Lenckus D City workers benefit from comp overhaul. Business Insurance 1994 April 18;28(16):138-139.

Liberty International Canada. Unfolding change: workers� compensation in Canada. A report forCanadians. 5 vols. [s.l.]: Liberty International Canada; 1995.

Macfarlane V. Occupational health and safety report: Diamond project. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; 1997.

Martin CW. MRI of the spine in a compensation setting. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; July 1993.

Martin CW. Victoria meniscectomy review, March 31, 1993. [Unpublished].

Martin CW. Worksite hazards evaluation, HCEP 512. Vancouver (BC): University of British Columbia;December 1993.

Mashaw J. Final report of the disability policy panel. [s.l.]: National Academy of Social Insurance;1996.

McDonald JB. Some generalized functions for the size distribution of income. Econometrica 1984May;52(3):647-63.

Memorandum from Dr. Don Copley to DAMAs re: PFI Outline, January 7, 1997.

Memorandum from Dr. Jane McEwan to Dr. Izabela Schultz. re: Information for the RoyalCommission. February 5, 1998.

Memorandum from Institute For Work & Health to Dr. Joy and Dr. Schultz re: Proposal. October 4,1996.

Memorandum to all support staff (Medical Services) and all CSMs (Abbotsford and Area Offices)from Terry Kelly re: Statistical Reporting, May 7, 1996.

Memorandum to Area Office CSMs and Medical Secretaries from Terry Kelly re: PerformanceMeasures - definitions, March 25, 1997.

Memorandum to David Martin from Laurel Courtenay re: Interpretation of Sections 58 through 65.May 7, 1997.

Michigan Worker�s Compensation. Return to work for less than 100 weeks. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; [s.a.].

Michigan Worker�s Compensation. Survivor�s benefits. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; [s.a.].

Mulcahy C. Disability rehab programs really pay off: study. National Underwriter 98(17):2.

Mulcahy C. Rehab saves $35 for every $1 spent, study finds. National Underwriter 1994 Apr25;98(19):17.

Munro C. Psychological disabilities and workplace stress: discussion of the Appeal Division. Workers�Compensation Reporter 1993 Nov 25.

National Institute of Disability Management and Research. Annual report 1996: clearing the way forthe future. Port Alberni (BC): The Institute; 1996.

National Institute of Disability Management and Research. Disability management programgraduates: making a difference in the workplace. Port Alberni (BC): The Institute; February 1997.

184

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

National Institute of Disability Management and Research. Recommendationsto the Royal Commission into the BC Workers� Compensation system. PortAlberni (BC): The Institute; January 1998.

National Institute of Disability Management and Research. Strategies forsuccess: disability management in the workplace. Port Alberni (BC): TheInstitute; 1997.

Neary J, Walsh J. Competitive underwriting of workers� compensation: anAustralian model. [s.l.]: Coopers & Lybrand; November 26, 1996.

Neufeld WP. A review of WCB cases treated by St. Paul�s chronic painprogram. [Vancouver (BC)]: [s.n.]; March 1993.

New Brunswick. Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission.Balancing services, benefits and assessments. Saint John (NB): TheCommission; October 1996.

Nexus Actuarial Consultants. Workers� Compensation Board of BritishColumbia survey of Canadian workers� compensation jurisdictions: finalreport. Vancouver (BC): Nexus; August 8, 1996.

Oaxana R. Male-female wage differentials in urban labour markets.International Economic Review 1978 Oct;14(3):693-709.

O�Callaghan P, Korbin J, Miller D. Workers� Compensation Board of BritishColumbia Board governance review: report and recommendations. Victoria(BC): Ministry of Skills, Training and Labour; 1995.

On decomposing the wage: a critical comment on Blinder�s Method. Journalof Human Resources 1982 Apr;18(1):127-31.

Outcome improvement in British Columbia work conditioning clinics[overheads]. Presentation by G. Feehan, V. Bednarski, A. Butterfield, and M.Forman. [Unpublished].

Perrin, Thorau & Associates. Comparative review of workers� compensationsystems and governance models: final report [Contract research for theRoyal Commission on Workers� Compensation in British Columbia].[Unpublished; May 23, 1997].

Phillips RB. Workers� compensation health care cost containment. Chiropracticcosts in workers� compensation. Horsham (PA): LRP Publications; 1992.

The Physician�s role in helping patients return to work after an illness or injury:CMA policy summary. Can Med Assoc J 1997 Mar 1;156(5): 680A-680C.

Price Waterhouse. The impact of managed care legislation: an analysis of fivelegislative proposals from California. [s.l.]: Price Waterhouse; [s.a.].

Rachinsky JW. Disability management key to today�s LTD insurance. NationalUnderwriter (Life/Health/Financial Services) 1996 Feb 19;100(8):14.

185F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Rathburn A, Seeman J. Identifying and measuring key characteristics ofdisability rehabilitation candidates. Employment Relations Today 1994Oct;41(10):27-29.

Rehabilitation Accreditation Commission. 1997 standards manual andinterpretative guidelines for medical rehabilitation. Tucson (AZ): CARF;1997.

Rehabilitation and re-employment of injured workers: making it work.Proceedings of the Corpus Sixth Annual Workers� CompensationConference; 1989 Oct.

Rieschi G. Wage loss payouts: the big squeeze. Canadian Underwriter 1995Feb;62(2):22-24.

Rodney GM. Life after injury in New Zealand : a lecture given at WCB of BCmedical rounds. Richmond (BC): Workers Compensation Board of BritishColumbia; 1996.

Roeher Institute. On target? Canada�s employment-related programs forpersons with disabilities. North York (ON): Roeher Institute; 1992.

Rydberg Levy Group. Presentation to WCB Compensation Services Division[slides]. [s.l.]: Rydberg Levy Group; June 18, 1996.

Rydberg Levy Group. Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia.Performance management report for the period Apr. �95 - Dec. �96.Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Rydberg Levy Group. Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia.Transforming the WCB 1995-1997. Submitted by Ken Fawcett. Richmond(BC): The Board; April 21, 1997.

Saper Z, Brasfield C. Two phase treatment of PD and PTSD: case study. [s.l.]:[s.n.]; 1998.

Saper Z, Millard R. What chronic pain treatment providers need to knowabout conditioned opponent process theory. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; [s.a.].

Schultz I. Occupational low back disability: current adjudicative,management, and research perspectives. Richmond (BC): Workers�Compensation Board of British Columbia; October 3, 1996.

Schultz I. Occupational stress. [Richmond (BC): Workers� CompensationBoard of British Columbia; s.a.].

Schultz I, Joy P, Fraser K. Models of diagnosis and rehabilitation in pain-related occupational disability. Richmond (BC): Workers� CompensationBoard of British Columbia. Department of Psychology; [s.a.].

Semmens T. Critical appraisal of the administrative inventories: prepared forthe Royal Commission on Workers� Compensation in BC, June 27, 1997.[Unpublished; 1997].

186

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Sonpal Valias N. Exploring the relationship between educational backgroundand employment outcomes. Rehabilitation Review 1997 Dec;8(12).

Souter G. Breaking comp gridlock. Business Insurance 1996 May 27;30(22):15.

Stages in back pain suggest new approach. At Work 1997 Fall:6-8.

Stephen M. Memorandum to VRC�s re: Job Search Guidelines

Temporary alternate duty programs succeed at returning disabled employeesto work. Employee Benefit Plan Review 1995 Jan;49(7):16-17.

Texas. Research and Oversight Council on Workers� Compensation. Return towork patterns of injured workers receiving maximum medicalimprovements. Austin (TX): The Council; 1995.

Thomason T, Hyatt D. The evolution of workers� compensation costs inCanada. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; [s.a].

Tindall D. Improving the utilization of services common to BC Rehab, WCB andICBC project: draft report. [Unpublished; April 16, 1996].

Tortarolo JS, Polakoff PL. Benchmarking health and disability benefits. BenefitsQuarterly 1995;11(1):38-45.

Turk D. Draft of proposal: letter to Dr. Joy and Dr. Schultz. [s.a.].

United States. Department of Education. National Institute on Disability andRehabilitation Research. Rehab brief: chronic back pain. Bringing ResearchInto Effective Focus 1993;15(7).

United States. Department of Labor Office. Inspector General audit report:consolidated report on the audit of employing agency workers�compensation programs. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; [s.a.].

United States. General Accounting Office. Health, Education and HumanServices Division. Social security disability insurance: multiple factors affectbeneficiaries� ability to return to work. Washington (DC): The Office;January 1998.

United States General Accounting Office. Social security disability insurance:multiple factors affecting beneficiaries� ability to return to work: report tothe Chairman, Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on Ways andMeans, House of Representatives in January 1998. Washington (DC): TheOffice; 1998.

United States. Rehab Services Administration. Basic vocational rehabilitationservices. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office; [s.a.].

United States. Rehab Services Administration. Special projects anddemonstrations for providing vocational rehabilitation services to individualswith severe disabilities. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office;[s.a.].

187F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

United States. Rehab Services Administration. State plan for the vocationalrehabilitation services program and state plan supplement for thesupported employment services program. Washington (DC): USGovernment Printing Office; [s.a.].

Unites States Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. Does vocationaleducation help the �forgotten half�: short-term economic consequencesof high school vocational education for non-college students.[Background paper for Congress of the United States]. Washington (DC):U.S. Government Printing Office; September 1995.

Vocational Rehabilitation Advisory Council: meeting agendas: 1996November 4; 1996 April 22.

Vocational Rehabilitation Committee and year 1 review. Workers�Compensation Board Bulletin 1993 Aug;4:2826.

Vocational Rehabilitation Council Meetings: Minutes for 1995 October 17and 1995 December 18.

Vocational Rehabilitation Services Advisory Council Meeting. Minutes 1995January 27.

Von Korff, M. Proposal for multivariate prediction of occupational disabilityamong lower back pain patients: letter to Dr. Joy and Dr. Shultz datedNovember 13, 1996. [Unpublished].

Waddell G. A new clinical model for the treatment of low back pain. [s.l.]:Spine 1987.

Walker JM. Beyond compliance: on the road to controlling workers�compensation. Risk Management 1994 Oct;4(10):27-9.

Wallbank R, Macfarlane V, Tindall D. Returning to work - removing thebarriers: phase II. Review of the legislation, policies and practicesaffecting partners: draft. [Unpublished; July 1997].

Ward JR. Worker�s compensation managed care. [s.l.]: North CarolinaIndustrial Commission; [s.a.].

Weavers G. Memorandum to all Client Services Managers re: PreventativeRehab. (Revised).

Weltz A. Principles and definitions:: an historical dialectic of public policygoals: draft December 17. [Contract research for the Royal Commissionon Workers� Compensation in British Columbia]. [Unpublished; 1997].

What the people said planning for the future of rehabilitation services inBritish Columbia. [s.l.]: Health Management Resource Group; March 31,1995.

188

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Williams B. A report on the 1994 German study tour and the �World at Work�presentation at the sixth European Regional Conference of RehabilitationInternational. [Victoria (BC): Ministry of Skills, Training and Labour]; 1994.

Wilson Banwell. Employee survey results: meeting leaders guide formanagers: Compensation Services (Lower Mainland). [s.l.]: [s.n.]; 1997November.

Wilson Banwell. Workers Compensation Board: employee survey results.Compensation Services (Lower Mainland). [s.l.]: [s.n.]; September 1997.

Wisconsin. Worker�s Compensation Division. Worker�s Compensation Divisionguide. Madison (WI): The Division; [s.a.].

WorkCover, Queensland. A Guide for Rehabilitation Coordinators andRehabilitation Service Providers. 1997 March.

Workers� Compensation Board of Alberta. Enhanced orthopaedicconsultations. Health Care Matter. 1997 Mar;1(1).

Workers� Compensation Board of Alberta. Medical Advisory guidelines.Edmonton (AB): The Board; July 29, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of Alberta. Medical Services manuals.Edmonton (AB): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of Alberta. New links to improve medicalreporting. Edmonton (AB): The Board; Fall 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of Alberta. New rehabilitation program to beginMay 5. Edmonton (AB): The Board; April 4, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of Alberta. Physios added to preferred providernetwork. The Communicator 1995 Jun.

Workers� Compensation Board of Alberta. Rehabilitation. Edmonton (AB): TheBoard; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. 1993 administrationbudget: 1993 vs. 1992. Richmond (BC): The Board; February 4, 1993.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. 1993 budget detailedexpense. Richmond (BC): The Board; September 21, 1992.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. 1995 corporate businessplan and budget. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. 1996 business plan.Richmond (BC): The Board; February 26, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. 1998 corporate businessplan. Richmond (BC): The Board; December 1997.

189F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. ACES - Accelerated Case/Claims Evaluation System. Adjudicators training manual. Richmond (BC):The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. ACES - Accelerated Case/Claims Evaluation System. OT network training manual. Richmond (BC):The Board; Jan. 1995 - 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Addendum to 1993budget narrative. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1993.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Administrativeinventories: how did the WCB respond? Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Administrativeinventories: is the methodology sound? Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Administrativeinventories: is the model appropriate? Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Administrativeinventories: what did they say? Detailed report. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Administrativeinventories: what did they say? Summary report. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Administrativeinventories: what have they covered? Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Anderson D. Stakeholderfeedback. Richmond (BC): The Board; March 12, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Annual report 1993, part1: corporate and financial information. Richmond (BC); The Board; 1993.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Annual report 1993, part2: statistics �93. Richmond (BC); The Board; 1993.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Annual report 1994.Richmond (BC); The Board; 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Annual report 1994:statistics �94. Richmond (BC); The Board; 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Annual report 1995:serving in a changing society. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. ASTD reference guide:staff development, Rehabilitation and Compensation Services Divisions.Richmond (BC): The Board; November 1996.

190

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Attending physician�shandbook: draft. Richmond (BC): The Board; April 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Board of Governors. Panelof Administrators. Minutes (extracts) by date.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Business case summary:service improvement strategy. Richmond (BC): The Board; April 23, 1997.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Business case summary:service improvement strategy. Richmond (BC): The Board; May 26, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Capital request businesscase procedures and guidelines: version 1.0. Richmond (BC): The Board;January 29, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Case manager�shandbook: draft. Richmond (BC): The Board; October 1, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Chronic pain glossary.Richmond (BC): The Board; December 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Clinical guidelines for theevaluation of permanent psychological impairment. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Clinical pilot trials ofbiopsychosocial measuring instruments for the study of multivariateprediction of occupational disability: low back. Executive summary.Richmond (BC): The Board; June 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Clinical practice guidelines:low back pain. Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Clinical practice guidelinesfor the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; October 4, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services.Automated wage loss payments system; number of cases in receipt ofrehabilitation expenditures (summary) for the period from Mar 01 1998 toMar 31 1998. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1998. Report WLS2630-6100.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services.Automated wage loss payments system; refund to the RehabilitationDepartment for the period from Mar 01 1998 to Mar 31 1998. Richmond(BC): The Board; 1998. Report WLS2640-6100

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Servicesmanagement meeting dated January 24, 1995. [Unpublished].

191F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services�performance report. Richmond (BC): The Board; October 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services�performance report. Richmond (BC): The Board; December 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Servicesstatistics to 1995. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation ServicesDivision. Case management: a developmental overview and preliminaryresults. Richmond (BC): The Board; October 20, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation ServicesDivision. Case management: a proposal for further development and roll-out. Richmond (BC): The Board; October 28, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation ServicesDivision. Case management planning. Richmond (BC): The Board; January1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation ServicesDivision. Claims management and the continuum of care. Richmond (BC):The Board; June 16, 1997. Practice directive No.: 12.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation ServicesDivision. Vocational Rehabilitation Services Department 1998 businessplan. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services�Divisional performance report: fourth quarter 1993. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1993.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services�Divisional performance report: first quarter 1994. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services�Divisional performance report: second quarter 1994. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services�Divisional performance report: first quarter 1995. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services�Divisional performance report: second quarter 1995. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services�Divisional performance report: third quarter 1995. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1995.

192

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services�Divisional performance report: fourth quarter 1995. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services�Divisional performance report: first quarter 1996. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services�Divisional performance report: second quarter 1996. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation Services�Divisional performance report: third quarter 1996. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Corporate Controller�sDepartment. 1997 budget general guidelines and targets. Richmond (BC):The Board; August 6, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Corporate Controller�sDepartment. 1997 budget preparation manual. Richmond (BC): The Board;October 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Decision support rolloutphase 1: business case. Richmond (BC): The Board; October 16, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Disability management:summary outline and background documents. Richmond (BC): The Board;1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Executive Committeepresentation: fee for service agreement between the WCB and the BCMA.Richmond (BC): The Board; January 22, 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. External preferred providerproject protocols and procedures: working document, version 1.0.Richmond (BC): The Board; January 27, 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Factors predictive ofdisability in workers� compensation claimants: a retrospective analysis ofroutinely-collected sociodemographic. Claim and clinical data: executivesummary. Richmond (BC): The Board; November 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Factors predictive ofoccupational low back disability in a Workers� Compensation Board pensionpopulation [abstract]. Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

193F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Financial expenditureauthority policy. (August 19, 1996) (in fact to March 6 1997). Richmond(BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Gallie K. Reducingaccident repetition: high risk program. Richmond (BC): The Board; May 6,1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia, Harder H. Job searchprogram evaluation: memorandum as of March 20, 1991.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Hart L. Health carebenefits: department in transition. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Health care issues underthe Workers� Compensation Act: a briefing paper. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; February 5, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Human ResourcesDepartment. WCB positions description and assessment tools: VocationalRehabilitation Consultant. Richmond (BC): The Board; June 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Interdisciplinary painprogram network: quarter four, 1996. Program performance report (DianeCrowe, Program Evaluation and Research Unit). Richmond (BC): TheBoard; June 2, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Interdisciplinary painprogram network: quarter one, 1997. Program performance report. (DianeCrowe, Program Evaluation and Research Unit). Richmond (BC): TheBoard; September 26, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal AuditDepartment. Analysis of Vocational Rehabilitation Services, 1993 andRehabilitation Centre updates, 1994-1995. Richmond (BC): The Board;February 17, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal AuditDepartment. Analysis of Vocational Rehabilitation Services and LOEpension awards. Richmond (BC): The Board; January 21, 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal AuditDepartment. Application access controls audit: final report (RehabilitationCentre PC/LAN audit). Richmond (BC): The Board; June 30, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal AuditDepartment. Code R audit: final report. Richmond (BC): The Board; May29, 1992.

194

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal Audit Department.Code R audit: follow-up audit. Richmond (BC): The Board; Jul 7, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal Audit Department.Internal audit significant issues: 1997 update. Richmond (BC): The Board;1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal Audit Department.Prince George service delivery location audit: final report. Richmond (BC):The Board; December 30, 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal Audit Department.Vocational Rehabilitation Committee audit: final report. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; January 6, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal Audit Department.Vocational Rehabilitation Committee follow-up audit. December 18, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal Audit & Evaluation.Vocational rehabilitation interventions evaluation study. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; August 18, 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal Audit Department.Vocational rehabilitation interventions evaluation study: literature reviewcomponent. Richmond (BC): The Board; August 18, 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal Audit & Evaluation.Vocational rehabilitation interventions evaluation study. Terms of reference.Richmond (BC): The Board; July 13, 1993.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal Audit Department.Vocational rehabilitation third party service providers review. Richmond(BC): The Board; Jul 7, 1995.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Investment capital request -case management project. Richmond (BC): The Board; January 16, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia, Johnson L. Presentation onASTD�s to the Royal Commission on Workers� Compensation in BC. January30, 1998 [slides]. [Unpublished].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. 1995 hand unit annual report: outcomes of Hand Unitclients discharged in 1995. Richmond (BC): The Board; May 31, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. 1995 quarter four follow-up: program evaluationreport on the L.R. Peterson Rehabilitation Centre Work ConditioningProgram. (Valerie Bednarski, Program Evaluation and Research Unit.Richmond (BC): The Board; May 10, 1996.

195F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. 1996 fourth quarter Hand Unit Program clientfeedback questionnaire findings. Richmond (BC): The Board; January 31,1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. 1997 First Half Head Injury Program: clientsatisfaction survey results. Richmond (BC): The Board; July 31, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Administrative policy/procedure manual. Richmond(BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Annual report 1993: for the period January 1 toDecember 31, 1993. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1993.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Annual report 1994. Richmond (BC): The Board;1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Back evaluation and education program (BEEP)policy/procedure manual. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. BC Liberal Party - FIPPA Request of Leslie R.Peterson Rehabilitation Centre of December 16, 1994. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1994. [69 separate items are closely consulted].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Clients discharged in quarter four 1995. Programevaluation report on the L.R. Peterson Rehabilitation Centre WorkConditioning Program (Valerie Bednarski, Program Evaluation andResearch Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; February 7, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Clients discharged in quarter two 1996: worksitereintegration program (Valerie Bednarski, Program Evaluation andResearch Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; September 13, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Client follow-up - quarter three 1996 discharges:external work conditioning programs (Valerie Bednarski, ProgramEvaluation and Research Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; April 7, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Data summary for clients discharged in quarter four1995: external work conditioning programs. (Valerie Bednarski, ProgramEvaluation and Research Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; June 3, 1997.

196

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. External multidisciplinary pain programs: 1994 clientsurvey. Program evaluation report. (Shelley Budgeon, Program Evaluationand Research Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; February 23, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. External interdisciplinary pain programs: 1995 annualreport. Program evaluation report. (Shelley Budgeon, Program Evaluationand Research Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; June 18, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. External interdisciplinary pain programs: customersatisfaction. Program evaluation report. (Shelley Budgeon, ProgramEvaluation and Research Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; January 12,1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. External interdisciplinary pain programs: quarter fourclients 1995. Program evaluation report. (Shelley Budgeon, ProgramEvaluation and Research Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; May 7, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. External interdisciplinary pain programs: fourthquarter client outcomes 1995. Program evaluation report (Shelley Budgeon,Program Evaluation and Research Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; April30, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. FEU client satisfaction report. Eliot Frymire-ProgramEvaluation and Research Unit. In: WCB of BC PERU evaluation reports.Richmond (BC): The Board; May 6, 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Follow-up of 1994 head injury clients. (Phillip Chow,Program Evaluation and Research Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; March21, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Follow-up report: amputee unit. Amputee Unitprogram operation summary, quarter one, 1996. In: PERU evaluationreports. Richmond (BC): The Board; May 31, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Functional evaluation unit: policy/procedure manual.Richmond (BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Hand Unit: 2nd quarter 1995. Action plan response toProgram Evaluation Report. Richmond (BC): The Board; Dec 14, 1995.

197F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Hand Unit. Follow-up survey of Hand Unit clientsdischarged between July and September 1995 - quarter three, 1995.Program Evaluation Report. (Phillip Chow, Program Evaluation andResearch Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; January 31, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Hand Unit. Follow-up survey of Hand Unit clientsdischarged between October and December 1995 - quarter four, 1995.Program Evaluation Report. (Phillip Chow, Program Evaluation andResearch Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; April 30, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Head Injury Program operation statistics: quarterone 1996. Richmond (BC): The Board; May 31, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Head injury satisfaction survey findings. Richmond(BC): The Board; November 8, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. The Interdisciplinary Pain Program�s EarlyIntervention Project: an examination of oucomes. (Bob Prosser ProgramEvaluation and Research Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; May 12, 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Interdisciplinary pain program network - quarter four1996. Program performance report. (Diane Crowe, Program Evaluation andRedearch Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; June 2, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Interdisciplinary pain program network - quarter one1997. Final version. Program performance report (Diane Crowe, ProgramEvaluation and Redearch Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; September 26,1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Jessup BA. Cost containment in rehabilitation.[Unpublished].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. L.R. Peterson Medical Rehabilitation Program -quarter one 1997: program performance report. (Diane Crowe, ProgramEvaluation and Research Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; May 28, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Occupational Rehabilitation Program - quarter one1997. Program performance report. (Diane Crowe, Program Evaluation andResearch Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; June 18, 1997.

198

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. . Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Overview of the 443 admissions to the external workconditioning program who were discharged between January 1, 1994 andMay 31, 1994: executive summary. Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Program evaluation report on the FunctionalEvaluation Unit: fourth quarter, 1995. First draft. Richmond (BC): The Board;March 27, 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Program evaluation report on the FunctionalEvaluation Unit: fourth quarter, 1996. First draft. Richmond (BC): The Board;March 27, 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Program evaluation report on the Hand Unit: 1996annual report - final draft. Richmond (BC): The Board; July 7, 1997).

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Program report on the functional evaluation unit: firstquarter, 1997. Richmond (BC): The Board; March 25, 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Quarter four 1995: program evaluation report on theOccupational Rehabilitation Program. (Diane Crowe, Program Evaluationand Research Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; April 10, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Quarter four 1996: program evaluation report on theMedical Rehabilitation Program (Diane Crowe, Program Evaluation andResearch Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; April 16, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Quarter four 1996: program evaluation report on theOccupational Rehabilitation Program. (Diane Crowe, Program Evaluationand Research Unit). Richmond (BC): The Board; January 31, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Soft tissue recovery. Richmond (BC): The Board;1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Strategic plan 1994-1999. Richmond (BC): The Board;1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Strategic plan 1995-2000: business plan 1995.Richmond (BC): The Board; February 1995.

199F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Leslie R. PetersonRehabilitation Centre. Summit Rehabilitation Multidisciplinary FunctionalImprovement Program: follow-up study on October 1993-June 1994.Richmond (BC): The Board; November 24, 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Looking to the future:finding common ground. A response to the W.E. Upjohn Institute forEmployment Research final report: vocational rehabilitation - policy andpractice at the WCB of British Columbia. Richmond (BC): The Board;October 1, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Managing disability.Richmond (BC): The Board; January 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Massing G. Duty toaccommodate. Richmond (BC): The Board; March 22, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Medical AdvisoryCommittee. Terms of reference: draft. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Medical and legal issuesrelated to the recognition of occupational disease: a briefing paper.Richmond (BC): The Board; January 22, 1997.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Medical ServicesDepartment. Medical Services and X-ray 1994 budget presentation.Richmond (BC): The Board; 1994.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Medical ServicesDepartment. Permanent disability evaluation schedule. Richmond (BC):The Board; January 1992.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Medical ServicesDepartment. Permanent functional impairment outline. Richmond (BC):The Board; August, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Medical ServicesDepartment. Procedure manual for physicians. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; May 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Memorandum from theExecutive Committee to the Board of Governors re: Diagnostic andrehabilitation models; options for the Workers� Compensation Board.June 13, 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Memorandum ofAgreement and Fee Schedules. [Unpublished].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Memorandum re:explanation of missing tabs in Compensation Services report, December1997. [Unpublished].

200

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Minutes: Panel ofAdministrators Meeting. 1995 December 7.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Minutes: Panel ofAdministrators Meeting. 1996 January 9.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Models of diagnosis andrehabilitation in pain related occupational disability [abstract]. Richmond(BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Modified employment andtimely return to work: adjudicative guidelines for timely modified return towork programs. Practice directive. Richmond (BC): The Board; November23, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Multivariate prediction ofchronic occupational disability: low back. Research proposal. Richmond(BC): The Board; April 5, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Multivariate prediction ofoccupational disability: low back. Phase 1: development of data collectionprotocols. Research proposal: executive summary. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; June 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia, National AdvisoryCommittee. Development of data collection protocols, 1996-1998. Phase 1:research proposal. Richmond (BC): The Board; June 6, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia, National AdvisoryCommittee. Research proposal. Phase 1: development of data collectionprotocols, January 1, 1997 - December 31, 1998. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; October 31, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Occupational rehabilitationproposal package. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Orientation manual forWCB physicians. Richmond (BC): The Board; May 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Panel of Administrators.Resolution 11/14/97-01 re: case management. Richmond (BC): The Board;November 14, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Panel of Administrators.Resolution 11/14/97-02 re: case management policy. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; November 14, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Policy and RegulationDevelopment Bureau. Policy priorities 1998. Richmond (BC): The Board;December 22, 1997.

201F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Policy and RegulationDevelopment Bureau. Vocational rehabilitation and re-employment issues:a briefing paper. Richmond (BC): The Board; June 23, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Prediction of return towork based on clinical impairment & sociodemographic variables inworkers with loss of earnings pensions. Results of a pilot study 1994-95.Appendix 1: model of adult disability. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Prevention Division.Return to work: worksafe. Richmond (BC): The Board; Fall 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Programs, services, andclients treated. Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.1994 objectives and operating plan. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.1995 business plan. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.1996 business plan. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.1997 business plan. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Agency assessment report. Richmond (BC): The Board; June 14, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Client psychological emergency procedures. Richmond (BC): The Board ;July 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Department policy. Procedure manual. Richmond (BC): The Board ; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Guidelines for service providers. Richmond (BC): The Board; February1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Guidelines for medico-legal assessment in psychological practice in WCBsetting. Richmond (BC): The Board; July 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Job descriptions. Richmond (BC): The Board; June 1993-July 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Miscellaneous service areas. Richmond (BC): The Board; November 7,1997.

202

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Operations manual. Richmond (BC): The Board ; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Quarterly report: first quarter 1995. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Quarterly report: second quarter 1995. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Quarterly report: third quarter 1995. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Service Centre 4000 quarterly report. First quarter 1996. Richmond (BC):The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Service Centre 4000 quarterly Report. Second quarter 1996. Richmond (BC):The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Service quality survey results. Richmond (BC): The Board ; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Strategic plan. Richmond (BC): The Board; February 1993.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Psychology Department.Teaching. Richmond (BC): The Board; July 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation andCompensation Division. Key performance indicators and strategicobjectives. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation andCompensation Services Division. 1997 business plan. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation andCompensation Services Division. 1998 business plan: draft. Richmond (BC):The Board; 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation &Compensation Services Division operating report for YTD June, 1996.Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation &Compensation Services Division operating report for YTD September 1996.Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

203F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation &Compensation Services Division operating report for first quarter, 1997.Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation &Compensation Services Division operating report for YTD June 1997.Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation Servicesand Claims manual. Richmond (BC): The Board; February 25, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Return to work statisticsto 1995. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. RPH 090-101: paymentprocedure: code R - income continuity. Richmond (BC): The Board;September 1996.

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rydberg Levy Group. Ninemonth status report. Richmond (BC): The Board; February 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Salaried physicians�agreement, April 1, 1995-March 31, 1999. Richmond (BC): The Board;1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Senior ExecutiveCommittee. Index of Submissions of Senior Executive CommitteePresentations. April 4/95 - March 13/97. [Unpublished].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Senior ExecutiveCommittee. Minutes (extracts) by date.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Senior ExecutiveCommittee. Prediction of chronic occupational disability. Richmond (BC):The Board; April 4, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Senior ExecutiveCommittee. Transforming the Workers� Compensation Board of BritishColumbia: a strategic plan. A consultation document. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; December 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Service deliverystrategies: key initiatives 1998. Staff information package. Richmond (BC):The Board; December 5, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Short term (wage loss)claims. Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Strategic plan: projecttracking. Richmond (BC): The Board; February 27, 1997.

204

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Strategic plan: strategicinitiatives, stakeholder concerns and SEC recommendations. Richmond(BC): The Board; March 14, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Strategic Projects:research 1996. Connecting information silos. Richmond (BC): The Board;1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Summary of administrativeoperating expenses, 1995 to 1998. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Technology Committeeterms of reference: draft. Richmond (BC): The Board; January 20, 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Transforming the WCB ofBC: a strategic plan. Richmond (BC): The Board; April 4, 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Vocational RehabilitationConsultant performance and client service expectations. Richmond (BC):The Board; January 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Vocational rehabilitationexpenditures to 1996. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Vocational rehabilitation:strategic action plan. Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Vocational RehabilitationServices. Procedure handbook. Richmond (BC): The Board; July 1994.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Vocational RehabilitationServices. Strategic analysis for planning purposes. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; April 13, 1992.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Vocational RehabilitationServices Advisory Council Meeting. Minutes for 28 April 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Vocational RehabilitationServices professional development workshop: December 3rd and 4th, 1996- agenda. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. WCB environmental scan:external factors. Draft. Richmond (BC): The Board; November 21, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. WCB of BC: strategic dataassembly: internal environment. Draft. Richmond (BC): The Board;September 6, 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. WCB standards ofconduct: a guide to honest, impartial, and ethical work practices for WCBemployees. Richmond (BC): The Board; December 1994

205F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. WCB strategic plan:internal and external scan documents. Draft. Richmond (BC): The Board;November 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. WCB�s mandate: to assistand inform. Richmond (BC): The Board; December 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Work conditioningprogram: policy and procedures manual. Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Yearly summary of newinjuries reported and number of claims first paid, 1988-1997. Richmond(BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers Compensation Board of Manitoba. Benefits administration -vocational rehabilitation: October 1, 1994. Winnipeg (MA): The Board;October 1994.

Workers Compensation Board of Manitoba. Vocational rehabilitation at theWCB of Manitoba. Winnipeg (MA): The Board; [s.a.].

Worker�s Compensation in California. [s.l.]: [s.n.]: [s.a.].

World Rehabilitation Fund Inc. The changing nature of work, society anddisability: the impact on rehabilitation policy. New York (NY): The Fund;1987.

Websites

Alberta Medical Association. Position statement: early return to work afterillness or injury. [article online] No date [cited 1997 Sep 24]:[3 screens].Available from: http://www.amda.ab.ca/mpinfo/posstat/rtn-wrk.htm.

Butler P. Managed care plan liability: an analysis of Texas and Missourilegislation. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation Report. [article online]1997 Nov: [6 screens]. Available from: http://www.kff.org/archive/health_policy/market/managed/tx_mo_sum.html.

Chansky S, Cremin TJ. Keeping workers� compensation costs under control.[article online] 1995 [cited 1997 Mar 12]: [5 screens]. Available from: http://www.blueworld.com/milliman/publications/perspectives/persp_8-96/keepingw.

F. Kenneth Walton Law Corp. Entitlement to long term disability under theCanada Pension Plan Act [memorandum]. [article online] 1998 [cited 1998Feb 2]:[11 screens]. Available from: http://www.islandnet.com/~fkwalton/CPP.html.

206

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Florida. Department of Labor & Employment Security. Division of Workers�Compensation. Defining, measuring and predicting return to work inFlorida. [article online] 1997 [cited 1997 Sep 24]:[50 screens]. Availablefrom: http://www.wc.les.state.fl.us/DWC/html/publications/rtw.html.

Greely RM. Carpal tunnel syndrome is treatable. [article online] 1997 [cited1998 Jan 29]: [3 screens]. Available from: http://www.townonline.com/work.

Harnden E [Representing Employers in Labour Relations & Employment Law].Emphasis on early return to work in new workers� compensation legislation.[article online] No date [cited 1997 Sep 23]:[3 screens]. Available from:http://www.emond-harnden.com/wcb.htm.

Harnden E. Less government involvement, more flexibility. [article online] Nodate [cited 1997 Sep 23]:[3 screens]. Available from: http://www.emond-harnden.com/ohsa2.html.

Hurley CA. Reintegration of injured workers into the workforce. [article online]1997 Summer [cited 1997 Dec 2]: [3 screens]. Available from: http://www.ability.ns.ca/v5n.

Industrial safety and workers� compensation services. [article online] No date[cited 1998 Feb 2]:[64 screens].Available from: http://www.oakes.org/webdoc10.htm.

Michaels RD, Jenkinson SH. Vocational implications of a disability. [articleonline] 1996 [cited 1997 Nov 25]: [3 screens]. Available from: http://www.michaels-assoc.com/news2.htm.

New York State Workers� Compensation Board. Promoting return to work. In:Social security disability programs lag in promoting return to work. [articleonline] March 1997 [cited 1998 Jan 9]:[ [3 screens]. Available from: http://www.wcb.state.ny.us/gaorpt.

Oakes, MT. Countering chronic pain myths. [article online] 1998 [cited 1998 Feb2]: [30 screens]. Available from: http://www.oakes.org/webdoc3.htm.

Promoting safe and early return to work. The Joint Health & Safety CommitteeNewsletter [serial online] 1997 [cited 1997 Nov 25]:[2 screens]. Availablefrom: http://www.hronline.com/lib/ohs.

Stern R, Peterson M, Reville R, Vaiana M. Findings and recommendations onCalifornia�s permanent partial disability system: executive summary. RAND[article online] 1997 [cited 1998 Feb 2]:[1 screen]. Available from: http:/www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR919.

207F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Texas. Research and Oversight Council on Workers� Compensation. Return towork patterns of injured workers receiving supplemental income benefits.[article online] 1995 May [cited 1997 Sep 24]:[3 screens]. Available from:http://www_roc.capnet.state.tx.us/rtwpat.htm.

West J, Sisters of Charity Health Care Systems Inc. Risk management andmedical practice guidelines: what is risk management�s proper role?Journal of Healthcare Risk Management [serial online] 1994 Summer [nocited date given]. Available from: http://www.wp.com/hcla/summer1.htm.

West Virginia Rehabilitation Research & Training Centre. What is vocationalrehabilitation. [article online] No date [cited 1997 Sep 23]:[1 screen].Available from: http://www.lcdi.wvu.edu/VR.htm.

Wisconsin. Worker�s Compensation Division. How to evaluate disability underWisconsin�s Worker�s Compensation Law. [article online] 1996 [cited 1997Jul 28]: [22 screens]. Available from: http://badger.state.wi.us/agencies.

208

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

THE ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY OF THE WORKERS�COMPENSATION BOARD OF BRITISH COLUMBIA: A HUMANRESOURCES SYNTHESIS

Submitted by

Weltz, Angela and Geoff Grover

REFERENCES

General Articles

Band DC, Scanlan G, Tustin C. Beyond the bottom line: gainsharing andorganizational development. Personnel Review 1994;23(8):17-32.

Betcherman G, Leckie N, McMullen K. Training for the new economy: asynthesis report. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Policy Research Networks; 1997.

British Columbia. Office of the Auditor General. Accountability reportingreview: report prepared for the WCB. [Unpublished; January 1998].

British Columbia. Office of the Auditor General. Crown corporationsgovernance study. Victoria (BC): Office of the Auditor General; 1996.

British Columbia. Office of the Auditor General. Ethics codes in the publicsector. Report 10 (1996/97). Victoria (BC): The Office; June 1997.

British Columbia. Office of the Auditor General. Executive severance practices:government ministries and crown corporations performance review report 8(1996/97). Victoria (BC): The Office; April 1997.

British Columbia. Office of the Auditor General. Deputy Ministers� Council.Enhancing accountability for performance: a framework and animplementation plan: second joint report. Victoria (BC): The Council; 1996.

Canada. Office of the Auditor General. Payroll costs management subjectmatter series: staff training, Human Resource planning and HumanResource information systems. Ottawa (ON): The Office; July 1981.

Canadian Comprehensive Auditing Foundation. Accountability, performancereporting, comprehensive audit: an integrated perspective. Ottawa (ON):The Foundation; 1996.

Catano VM. Competencies: a review of the literature and bibliography. TheCanadian human resources professional capabilities profile. Ottawa (ON):The Canada Council of Human Resource Associations, Human ResourcesDevelopment Canada; 1998.

Collins D. Case study: 15 lessons learned from the death of a gainsharing plan.How power struggles and political gamemanship killed one company�sgainsharing plan. Compensation and Benefits Review 1996 Mar/Apr;28(2):31.

209F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Compensation Employees� Union. 1995/1996 annual report. Richmond (BC):The Union; 1997.

Compensation Employees� Union. 1997 annual report. Richmond (BC): TheUnion; 1998.

Compensation Employees� Union. Presentation of the Board of Governors.WCB Bulletin 1992 Jun 23.

Compensation Employees� Union Membership Study: report on quantitativeresearch (March 1997) conducted by Viewpoint Research.

Compensation Employees� Union Newsletter: 1998 Jul; 1997 Oct; 350; 1997Sep;349; 1997 Aug;348; 1997 Jul;347; 1997 May;346;1997Mar;344; 1997Jan;343; 1996 Dec;342; 1996 Aug;339.

Conway C. Mentoring in the mainstream. Management Development Review1995;8(4):27-29.

Deloitte & Touche. Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. WCBreview of the adjudication function: organizational effectiveness review.Richmond (BC): The Board; May 1992.

Fulton J, Atkinson J. Medical and rehabilitation programs in workers�compensation: an administrative inventory in British Columbia. Ottawa(ON): The Health Group; 1993.

Gordon FL, O�Reilly JC. Technological change in the workplace: CLV specialreport. Toronto (ON): Carswell Thomson Publishing; 1997.

Government of Canada. Treasury Board Secretariat. Human resourcemanagement accountability framework: draft. [Ottawa (ON):unpublished;1994].

Guidelines for coaching and mentoring. Training and Development 1997Aug;51(8):23.

Hunt HA. Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. AssessmentDepartment administrative inventory. Kalamazoo (MI): W.E. UpjohnInstitute for Employment Research; 1992.

Hunt HA, Barth PS, Leahy MJ. Workers� compensation in British Columbia: anadministrative inventory at a time of transition. Kalamazoo (MI): W.E.Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; 1991.

Hunt HA, Barth PS, Leahy MJ. The Workers� compensation system of BritishColumbia: still in transition. Kalamazoo (MI): W.E. Upjohn Institute forEmployment Research; 1996.

Hunt HA, Leahy MJ. Vocational rehabilitation: policy and practice at the WCBof British Columbia: a study submitted to the WCB. [s.l.]: unpublished;July 7, 1997].

210

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Kaye B, Jacobson B. Reframing mentoring. Training and Development 1996Aug;50(8):44.

Letter to Panel of Administrators from Bill Hawkins, President, CEU re: CEUsupport for more resources to implement E-file, July 9, 1996.

Memorandum from Joe Pinto to David Anderson dated April 10, 1997 re:Qualifications � Claims Adjudicators and Vocational RehabilitationConsultants

Memorandum to Hugh Alley dated April 24, 1997 re: Rehabilitation CaseAssistant and Back-up Claims Adjudicator Training Lesson Plans andHandouts.

Memorandum to Joe Pinto dated April 4, 1997 re: Royal Commission Requestfor information regarding WCB VRC Qualifications and Training.

Miller C, Schuster M. The anatomy of failure: a non-recommended applicationof gainsharing and its predictable effects on productivity in a public sectorsetting. Public Administration 1995 Summer;19(2):217-42.

P.S. Ross and Partners. Review of organization and administration of Workers�Compensation Board of British Columbia. Victoria (BC): [s.n.]; 1976.

Recardo R, Pricone D. How to determine whether gainsharing is for you.Industrial Management 1996 Jan/Feb;38(1):12-18.

Rest KM, Ashford NA. Occupational health and safety in British Columbia: anadministrative inventory of the prevention activities of the WorkersCompensation Board. Cambridge (MA): Ashford & Associates; 1997.

Rest KM, Ashford NA. Occupational safety and health in British Columbia: anadministrative inventory. Cambridge (MA): Ashford & Associates; 1992.

Rydberg Levy Group. Presentation to WCB Compensation Services Division.[Unpublished: June 18, 1996].

Rydberg Levy Group, Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia.Transforming the WCB 1995-1997. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Smith, Mark, CEU Observer. Coquitlam proof of concept: final report.[Unpublished: June 25, 1996].

Souque JPl. Conference Board of Canada. Focus on competencies: trainingand development practices, expenditures and trends. Ottawa: (ON):Conference Board of Canada; 1996. Report 177-96

Sullivan R, Miklas D. On-the-job training that works. Training and DevelopmentJournal. 1985 May:118-20.

Survey of change expectations and working conditions among Coquitlam SDLemployees: post E-file proof of concept state. [Unpublished; June 1996].

211F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

VRS Research and Development Retrospective. Summary of activities since1995. [s.l.]: [s.n.]; [s.a.].

Welbourne T, Gomex Mejia LR. Gainsharing: a critical review and a futureresearch. Journal of Management 1995 Fall;21(3):559.

Workers Compensation Board and the Compensation Employees� Union.Collective Agreement(s): April 1, 1995 to March 31, 1998 and April 1, 1998to March 31, 2002.

Workers� Compensation Board of Alberta. 1997 annual report. Edmonton(AB): The Board; 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Advancing the plan: areview and restatement of the WCB strategic plan: draft documentprepared by the Senior Executive Committee to the Panel ofAdministrators. [Richmond (BC): unpublished; 1998].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Building trustrelationships. Pre-workshop package participant guide booklet andparticipant manual. [Richmond (BC): The Board; s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Cook L, Dean D, Grant C,Gibson S. Business plan 1995: Human Resources operations. Richmond(BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Business plan 1996:Human Resources. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Business plan 1996:Human Resources plan update for the Panel of Administrators. Richmond(BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Business plan 1997:Human Resources and corporate development. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Business plan 1998:Human Resources. Richmond (BC): the Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. E-file job specificbusiness process guidelines. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. E-file training materials.Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. E-file training packages.Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997/1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Fair and effectivemanagement of performance problems. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

212

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Key performance indicatorreport(s) [quarterly]. Richmond (BC): The Board: 1997/1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Managers� corporatehuman resources policy guide. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Sample package ofemployer service representative training. Summary of AssessmentDepartment Employer Service Strategy training plan for 1998. Richmond(BC): The Board; 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Strategic planning �strategic initiatives, stakeholder concerns and SEC recommendations. Panelof Administrators� record of decisions. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. WCB employee surveyresults: report(s). 8 vols. Richmond (BC): The Board; November 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation ServicesDivision. Compensation Services management meeting minutes.[Richmond (BC): unpublished; January 24, 1995].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Compensation ServicesDivision . Freedom of information and protection of privacy trainingmaterials. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Corporate business planand budget 1995. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1995.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Corporate business planand budget 1996. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Corporate business plan1997. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Corporate business plan1998. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Human Resources Division.Beyond traditional job development: training workbook. Human ResourcesCareer Planning Project. Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Human Resources Division.Core values report and corporate training strategy report: Senior ExecutiveCommittee minutes. Richmond (BC): February 18, 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Human Resources Division.Employment equity plan: draft. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Human Resources Division.Performance review and management development program handbook.Richmond (BC): The Board; April 1998.

213F I N A L R E P O R T

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Human ResourcesDivision. Response to the Royal Commission�s request dated August 4,1998. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Human ResourcesDivision. WCB positions description and assessment tools. Richmond(BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Human Resources andCorporate Planning Division. Labour relations strategy. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; May 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Human Resources andCorporate Planning Division. Response to Royal Commission requestMarch 1997. Richmond (BC): The Board; April 4, 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Human ResourcesDivision. Labour Relations Department. Early retirement and cash incentiveprogram: submission to the Panel of Administrators. [Richmond (BC):unpublished; 1998].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Internal AuditDepartment. WCB internal audit reports: 1989-1998. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Labour RelationsDepartment. Comparison of conditions across Crown CorporationsEmployers Association collective agreements. [Memorandum to the RoyalCommission]. [Richmond (BC): unpublished: 1998].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Office of the Governors.Proposal to Accomplish Governors� goals through structural change.Richmond (BC): The Board; 1993.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Panel of Administrators:policy and procedures manual. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Panel of Administrators.Senior Executive Committee. Transforming the Workers� CompensationBoard of British Columbia: a strategic plan. Richmond (BC): The Board;1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Prevention Division.Discussion of OSH training needs: content, delivery, recognition.[Richmond (BC): unpublished; April 1996].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Prevention Division.Support information for Prevention Division presentation to the RoyalCommission July 18, 1997. 6 vols. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1997.

214

B I B L I O G R A P H Y

R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n W o r k e r s� C o m p e n s a t i o n i n B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a

VOLUME III: CHAPTER 4

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation andCompensation Services Division 1997 business plan. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1996.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation andCompensation Services Division 1998 business plan. Richmond (BC): TheBoard; 1997.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation andCompensation Services Division. Response to the Royal Commission�srequest dated July 2, 1998. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Rehabilitation andCompensation Services Division. Staff development update. Vol.1.Richmond (BC): The Board; July 1998.

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Vocational RehabilitationServices. Professional development workshop: duty to accommodate,conflict resolution and labour market trends. Richmond (BC): The Board;[s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Vocational RehabilitationServices. Research and Development. VRC training topic checklist andneeds assessment. Richmond (BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers� Compensation Board of British Columbia. Vocational RehabilitationServices. VRC training: claims adjudicator � training schedule. Richmond(BC): The Board; [s.a.].

Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia. WCB management scanresults. Richmond (BC): The Board; 1996.

Websites

British Columbia. Office of the Auditor General. Enhancing accountability forperformance in the British Columbia public sector. [document online] 1995June [cited 1997 Jun 2]:[67 screens]. Available from: http://www.gov.bc.ca/pubs/1994-95/special/enh_acct/acctto.

British Columbia. Office of the Auditor General. Enhancing accountability forperformance in the British Columbia public sector: a progress report to theLegislative Assembly [document online] 1995 [cited 1998 Feb 5]. Availablefrom: http://www.oag.bc.ca/pubs/1997-98/account/.