9
KPIs and Machine Comparisons Joe Temple [email protected] www.lc-ns.com Copyright 5/2014 t Low Country North Shore Consulting

KPIs and Machine Comparisons Joe Temple [email protected] Copyright 5/2014 t Low Country North Shore Consulting

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: KPIs and Machine Comparisons Joe Temple jtemple29588@lc-ns.com  Copyright 5/2014 t Low Country North Shore Consulting

Copyright 5/2014 t Low Country North Shore Consulting

KPIs and Machine Comparisons

Joe [email protected]

www.lc-ns.com

Page 2: KPIs and Machine Comparisons Joe Temple jtemple29588@lc-ns.com  Copyright 5/2014 t Low Country North Shore Consulting

Copyright Low Country North Shore Consulting

The Four basic KPIs• Internal Throughput Rate (ITR)

– Metric measured by most benchmarks– Given workload find the maximum steady state throughput– Divide result by steady state utilization. – Usually I~ Result because utilization is very high

• External Throughput Rate (ETR)– This is the average throughput rate over a period of time which has business significance– ETR ~ ITR/Average Utilization– This is the Enterprise view of performance (How much work do I do each shift?)

• N – The number of independent workload instances that a machine can host (VMs, Subsystems,

Guests, Tenants, Applications, DBs, etc.)– Varies by workload usage pattern and size– It is determined by machine capacity

• Speed– The inverse of response time– Related to throughput rate, usage pattern, utilization, and service level.– This is the users’ view of performance (How fast does my work get done?)

Page 3: KPIs and Machine Comparisons Joe Temple jtemple29588@lc-ns.com  Copyright 5/2014 t Low Country North Shore Consulting

Copyright Low Country North Shore Consulting

The three Comparators

• Benchmarks – ITR at acceptable Speed

• Operational Throughput– ETR at acceptable Speed

• Operational Consolidation– N at acceptable Speed

Enterprise class machines should be compared on Operational KPI Comparators

Speed is included in these to represent the user point of view

Page 4: KPIs and Machine Comparisons Joe Temple jtemple29588@lc-ns.com  Copyright 5/2014 t Low Country North Shore Consulting

Copyright Low Country North Shore Consulting

Benchmarks

Wider diamonds have greater comparator values

Page 5: KPIs and Machine Comparisons Joe Temple jtemple29588@lc-ns.com  Copyright 5/2014 t Low Country North Shore Consulting

Copyright Low Country North Shore Consulting

OperationalThroughput

Wider diamonds have greater comparator values

Page 6: KPIs and Machine Comparisons Joe Temple jtemple29588@lc-ns.com  Copyright 5/2014 t Low Country North Shore Consulting

Copyright Low Country North Shore Consulting

Capacity

Wider diamonds have greater comparator values

Page 7: KPIs and Machine Comparisons Joe Temple jtemple29588@lc-ns.com  Copyright 5/2014 t Low Country North Shore Consulting

Copyright Low Country North Shore Consulting

Comparing Cores using Benchmarks Intel 8890 v2 to zEC12

The indicated zEC12 advantage will not be compelling because of price

Page 8: KPIs and Machine Comparisons Joe Temple jtemple29588@lc-ns.com  Copyright 5/2014 t Low Country North Shore Consulting

Copyright Low Country North Shore Consulting

Comparing Cores on Operational Throughput Intel 8890 v2 to zEC12

Here Intel matches zEC12 speed because of low utilization but ETR suffers.

Page 9: KPIs and Machine Comparisons Joe Temple jtemple29588@lc-ns.com  Copyright 5/2014 t Low Country North Shore Consulting

Copyright Low Country North Shore Consulting

Comparing Cores on Operational Consolidation Intel 8890 v2 to zEC12

Here zEC12 consolidates farm more workloads per core.