KOSOVO/A CIVIL SOCIETY PROJECT KOSOVO/A STANDING TECHNICAL

WORKING GROUP Tenth Meeting

Justice, Human Rights, and Law and Order

Robert Curis

Grand Hotel, Pristina, 12 October 2002

ECMI Report # 39

December 2002

EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor Building) D-24939 Flensburg Germany ( +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 e-mail: info@ecmi.de internet: http://www.ecmi.de

2

ECMI Report # 39

European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Marc Weller ECMI gratefully acknowledges the generous support of the Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (FRESTA/Secretariat for Peace and Stability), the Stability Pact Fund of the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Swedish Foreign Ministry. © Copyright 2002 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Published in December by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI)

3

CONTENTS

I. Introduction..........................................................................................................1

II. The ECMI Expert Committee on Justice, Human Rights, and Law & Order .....1

III. The Tenth Meeting of the STWG:

Civil Service Law, Labour Law and the Regulations Managing Municipalities.2

IV. Summary of the Proceedings ...............................................................................3

A. Labour Law.......................................................................................................3

B. Civil Service Law..............................................................................................3

C. Managing the Municipalities: Regulation 2000/45 and 2000/49......................5

V. Conclusions with Recommendations...................................................................6

VI. Annex

A. Programme of Workshop ..............................................................................12

B. List of Participants.........................................................................................13

C. Monitoring Report .........................................................................................16

1

I. Introduction

The Standing Technical Working Group (STWG) was established in March 2001 to

address important issues of public policy in Kosovo/a at a technical level. It is

composed of experts from Kosovo/a NGOs, the political parties and other civil society

representatives. Its membership is fully interethnic and it prides itself on being able to

conduct debate in Kosovo/a in an interethnic way. The Group reviews technical

aspects of current policy and formulates proposals and critical questions in relation to

them. It then seeks to engage the relevant appointed local and international

representatives on these issues. In response to the changed political environment in

Kosovo/a following the Assembly elections in November 2001, the Group sought to

enhance its role in public policy analysis and development through the establishment

of four expert working groups. These Expert Committees (ECs) have devoted their

activities in 2002 to monitoring policy developments in four areas considered most

relevant to the needs of all communities in Kosovo/a. One of these is the Expert

Committee on Justice, Human Rights, and Law & Order.

II. The ECMI Expert Committee on Justice, Human Rights, and

Law and Order

The ECMI Expert Committee on Justice, Human Rights, and Law & Order

commenced its activities in April 2002 by seeking to provide a forum for fostering

dialogue between the evolving ministerial authorities in Kosovo/a and local and

international experts engaged in the administration of justice as well as the

functioning of Kosovo/a regional and local administration. This process aimed to

parallel the transference of competencies from UNMIK’s Department of Local

Administration to the newly elected municipal representatives and the newly hired

civil servants, and assist policymakers in identifying issues of common concern to all

communities of Kosovo/a. Through a series of regular meetings with the relevant

policymakers and practitioners, the EC further sought to broaden the consultative

process of decision-making on matters of civil service law and the management of

municipalities as well as promote an exchange of ideas on ways of improving the

provision of services ‘on the ground’. In its consultations, the EC on Justice, Human

2

Rights, and Law and Order took as a starting point a monitoring report prepared by

the Committee’s chairman, Hysni Bajrami, on the progress in municipal

administration. It also sought the advice of external expertise on how to provide a

more up-to-date analysis of the state of civil service and labour laws in Kosovo/a and

undertook to analyze the wider political circumstances in which reform needed to

progress.

On 12 October 2002, the Expert Committee on Justice, Human Rights, and Law and

Order hosted a workshop to address its concerns and outline its recommendations.

The ongoing forum of the STWG was convened, and relevant local and international

policymakers and practitioners from civil administration were invited. A summary of

the debate is outlined below.

III. The Tenth Meeting of the STWG: Civil Service Law, Labour

Law and the Regulations Managing Municipalities

The tenth session of the STWG took place at the Grand Hotel Pristina. In preparation

for the meeting, the Expert Committee on Justice, Human Rights, and Law & Order

had met nine times and established a number of key objectives. These were:

• to provide a forum for the majority and minority communities in Kosovo/a to

discuss critical issues in civil service law and the managing of municipalities;

• to critically examine and, if necessary, suggest alternatives to regulations

2000/45 and 2000/49 in respect to the way these regulations do not provide

any real mandate to municipal administrators;

• to increase awareness of the UNMIK promulgated civil service law and labour

laws;

• to guide the debate and collaboratively formulate constructive policy

recommendations, with the input and assistance of external experts, and with a

view to translating these recommendations into operational terms.

The workshop took the form of three interrelated sessions of dialogue so as to

facilitate collaboration and constructive debate. Each session was chaired by a

3

member of the Expert Committee, Blerim Burjani, Nexhmedin Sejdiu, and Hysni

Bajrami respectively. The programme of the workshop is appended to this report.

IV. Summary of the Proceedings 1

The plenary session provided an opportunity to discuss the recommendations of the

EC on Justice, Human Rights, and Law and Order with respect to ongoing issues in

the areas of labour law, civil services law and the functioning of local power in

Kosovo/a.

A. Labour Law

There was first a brief opening discussion to present Kosovo/a’s labour law, in which

the assembled group questioned whether Kosovar employers had the resources to

support all provisions of this law. While the group agreed that the labour law should

reflect the standards of other European countries, they questioned whether Kosovo/a’s

economic situation warranted adopting the European model completely. As one

participant pointed out, while it may be possible for employers to grant unpaid leave,

they may not be in a position to grant maternity leave over six months. It was also

noted that disabled and handicapped employees had special needs that needed to be

incorporated into the legislation. The need to harmonize labour laws that are

currently contradictory or merely a duplication of existing laws was also discussed.

Finally, it was noted that the level of protection for employees working for

international organizations needed to be harmonized with those working for domestic

enterprises.

B. Civil Service Law

The Law for Civil Services of Kosovo/a (LCSK), adopted as UNMIK regulation

2001/36, constitutes an important step in legislation with regard to civil service

employees, as it creates an administrative legal base for an effective and impartial

civil service, selected and nominated according to the principle of merit. This law 1 The account that follows summarizes the discussion and debate of the proceedings. This account has not been reviewed by any of the participants and does not claim to reproduce the views of invited experts or each member of the Group.

4

determines the supporting principles that will manage the nominating procedures and

the conduct of those employed in the civil service, outlining their duties and

responsibilities, and other principles that display elements of best European practice

in public administration. In reviewing the Kosovo civil service law, the leaders of this

session’s discussion questioned the implementation of the regulation, which has been

in effect for the last ten months. The salient points of discussion are summarized in

bullet points below:

• Although civil service employees are supposed to be apolitical in their

capacity as civil service employees, the reality is that many engage in political

activities. The question then is how to clarify the law and consequently to

determine what kind of political activities civil servants are allowed to engage

in. For example, it was suggested that civil servants could be members of

political parties, but not active representatives.

• It was also questioned how it could be guaranteed that there would be an equal

representation of ethnic groups at the interview stage, when in many

municipalities the ethnic mix, or more accurately the lack thereof, makes this

impossible in practical terms. Participants commented that though it is

commendable to maintain an ethnic balance, this might prove problematic

especially when recruiting professional candidates such as doctors and

teachers.

• It was also pointed out that there was anecdotal evidence that at times even

UNMIK officials had not followed existing civil service regulations; examples

were given of Principle International Officers hiring and firing staff without

regard to the legislation.

• The length of experience required to gain employment in many civil service

positions was also questioned. While the present requirement of seven years’

experience would guarantee experienced workers, it was nevertheless felt that

this requirement would essentially rule out the possibility of identifying,

nurturing and mentoring young talent.

5

• The manner in which the civil service law had been drafted was also

addressed. Members of the STWG pointed out that there had been no

consultation with local populations in the drafting of the law. However, it was

conceded that as a draft law there was still opportunity for incorporating input

from the Kosovar population.

C. Managing the Municipalities: Regulations 2000/45 and 2000/49

In discussing the legislation for municipal governance, the inherent contradictions

between UNMIK Regulations 45 and 49 were central to the discussion. It was

questioned why increased powers were granted to the municipalities in Regulation 45

only to be rescinded again by Regulation 49. It was suggested by the Expert

Committee that part of this was due to confusion within UNMIK itself where the short

duration of international administrators’ appointments had reduced institutional

memory and consistency in policy.

The four municipality Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) present at the meeting

expressed their dissatisfaction with Regulation 49, saying that in essence it had made

them ‘paper tigers’, lacking any true authority to manage their municipalities at the

local level. In addition to the need to devolve powers to the municipal level, the CEOs

stressed, the capacity of local government civil servants had to be developed through

increased training. A further need to shift administrative powers from international

authorities to their local counterparts at the municipal level was also highlighted.

The role of the Kosovo Trust Agency (KTA) in the privatization of socially owned

enterprises (SOEs) was regarded by many members of the STWG as a further step in

removing municipal powers in the management, reallocation, and privatization of

municipal property and resources. The relative merits of carrying out the privatization

at the central rather than the local level were also discussed.

The role of the Community Offices in municipalities was also considered by the

members of the STWG. Some delegates observed that the Community Offices had

essentially become parallel administrative structures in the municipalities, although

6

they were initially set up to facilitate integration of minority groups into the central

municipal authority. International representatives at the plenary session stressed that

although the phasing out of Community Offices was envisioned, they would remain in

operation for the foreseeable future in order to ensure continued minority access to

municipal authorities.

V. Conclusions with Recommendations At the conclusion of the session, the Chair put the recommendations of the Expert

Committee on Justice, Human Rights, and Law and Order before the assembled

STWG. These recommendations had been generated through a process of consultation

and discussion among members of the Expert Committee, between local and

international experts, as well as members of the STWG plenary prior to the session.

The plenary examined these recommendations and offered criticisms and suggestions

that had been voiced during the debate. These have been incorporated into the final

text.

The recommendations set out below were approved unanimously by the STWG. The

EC on Justice, Human Rights, and Law and Order was then charged to actively

engage the relevant policy- and decision makers in the civil service, Ministry of

Labour and the UNMIK Department of Local Administration to take account of these

recommendations when in future addressing questions of implementing reform.

Recommendations on Kosovo/a’s Labour Law

1. Kosovo/a’s labour law was drafted according to international standards and fulfils

the fundamental needs of Kosovo/a.

2. The law itself requires careful reconsideration and indeed modification: Article 19

on the provision for maternity, for example, has left many families in Kosovo/a

unsure as to why ‘European’ standards have not been applied in this case.

7

3. The dualism of Basic Labour Law and Civil Service Law regulations should be

reviewed, as they are at odds with each other. (Simply stated, the regulations on Civil

Service Law are at odds with the regulations on Basic Labour Law.)

4. Supervising the implementation of the Basic Labour Law by the Work Inspectorate

of Kosovo/a is an important priority. Approval of the Inspection Law by the

Assembly would as a consequence enable the Inspectorate to supervise the

implementation of the Basic Labour Law. It would also obligate the employers of

Kosovo/a to respect this law.

5. Local employees who currently work for international organizations operating in

Kosovo/a are not included in the protection of the Basic Work Law. A mechanism

must therefore be found to protect and guarantee these employees’ rights.

6. The Assembly and the relevant decision-making bodies in Kosovo/a must urgently

address and legislate against the alarming increase in child labour in Kosovo/a.

Recommendations on the Law for Civil Services in Kosovo/a

1. The UNMIK Department of Civil Administration needs to develop and implement

an effective information campaign in order to assist civil servants in understanding the

extent of their rights and responsibilities.

2. A ‘Rules of Administration of the Kosovo/a Civil Service’ or a similar Handbook

needs to be promulgated. This will clarify the procedures for civil service

nominations, employee management and the rights and individual responsibilities of

civil service employees. It will also establish the necessary guidelines for the

implementation of the Law for Civil Services.

3. It is particularly important that these administrative rules clarify the definition of

‘political activity’ in relation to the civil service. Currently, the reality is that

municipal civil servants are also serving as members of the municipal assembly.

8

4. When establishing administrative directions relating to working conditions,

particularly with regard to such rights as sick leave, maternity leave, etc., the STWG

further urges the respective policymakers to consider adopting international standards

with regard to maternity leave, under-age and older workers. Moreover, the

‘administrative rules’ should also make provision for cases where the state is the

terminating party in an employment contract, e.g. with respect to civil servants, and

determine the obligations it has to undertake after termination of the contract.

5. An Independent Supervizing Council should be established immediately, in order to

review appeals against decisions made by the employment bodies in compliance with

Article 11 of this law.

6. It is essential to establish the Committee for High Public Nominations (CHPN) as

soon as possible, in order that nominations of permanent secretaries and executive

agencies are made in compliance with the Law for Civil Services.

Recommendations on the Functioning of

Local Power in Kosovo/a

1. The STWG calls for the clarification of the role, responsibilities and competences

of the municipalities e.g. by setting benchmarks for achieving a sustainable economic

development, and offering municipal public services and infrastructure, which were

originally determined as the responsibilities of municipalities but de facto never put

into practice.

2. Incongruity in UNMIK’s regulations should also be avoided e.g. inconsistency

between Regulations 45/2000 and 49/2000. This gives rise to concomitant

contradictions in Regulation 45/2000. By way of example, the management of

municipal property, according to Article 3, (h) Regulation 45/2000 is put in the hands

of the local institutions whereas, according to Article 48.14, municipal property is

managed by the Municipal Administrator.

3. There should be total transfer of municipal responsibilities from UNMIK to local

and from central to local level. The procedures that the municipal administration has

9

to follow to allow it to fulfil its full responsibilities must be clearly defined in order to

facilitate transfer completely.

4. Some functions and responsibilities should be delegated to outlying areas, such as

villages, so that people living in these locations can be provided with more up-to-date

and efficient services.

5. Transparency should be increased in municipal administration and citizens more

actively involved in its work. Interest groups, NGOs and public administration experts

should also be encouraged to voice their opinions on issues of municipal

administration. In this way, the municipal administrations should function as

reception/consultative offices (they already do so in six municipalities) and this

should be extended to offices in other municipalities. The concept of ‘client–server’

should be encouraged at the municipal level rather than the old style ‘party–servant’.

6. Regulation 45/2000 should be supported with regard to separating political

functionaries and civil servants.

7. Recruitment for the civil service should be done according to professional

competence and merit. Administration should be effected through the working

principles for civil service as foreseen in Regulation 36/2001, and staff recruited

accordingly.

8. Members of Committees and civil service bodies should be drawn from sources

outside the Assembly. The involvement of external experts can only enrich the work

of these bodies and through them the work of the Assembly.

9. All administrative services must be uniform and in accordance with the regulations

that are currently in operation. In this way, the local community offices must work

more closely with their respective municipalities.

10. The definition and identification of municipal property should be undertaken as a

matter of urgency, as the proper management of the municipal property lies in the

municipality itself. Attention should also be paid to urban planning and land use as

10

well as the proper implementation of regulations on construction. In this context, a

clear platform should be established for municipality competences and action with

regard to illegal construction. Municipal services and infrastructure must also be

improved.

11. Municipal Administration in its entirety must be organized in a way that it meets

the needs of citizens, in order to provide more effective and higher quality services.

This is particularly pertinent with regard to the need for updating information on civil

status and registration, where the greatest number of citizens are affected and where

the greatest number of problems occur.

12. Relations between the UNMIK Administrator and the Municipal Administration

must be coordinated and clarified so as to avoid repeating situations where the

Municipal Administrator has acted outside the scope of his competencies or has failed

to fulfil those obligations which fall within his mandate.

13. It is imperative that administrative services are better coordinated, especially those

that deal with issues of civil registration. At present, the procedures to issue

documents such as identity cards, marriage certificates, birth certificates vary

arbitrarily from location to location depending on how the local and international

officials implement administrative directives.

14. Training of civil servants in the municipalities should be extended, especially on

issues related to the functioning of the municipal administration e.g. establishing

general administrative procedures, training for urban planning and regulations on

illegal construction etc.

15. The equipment in the municipal administration needs to be modernized and the

staff newly trained. As a precondition of this, there is a need to standardize procedures

and programmes such that most administrative services (verdicts, judgment, different

certificates) can be performed both efficiently and cost-effectively.

16. The Assembly of Kosovo/a needs to establish Commissions that are tasked to deal

specifically with the problems of local power.

11

17. Some provisions of Regulation 45/2000 must be modified in order to provide

functional solutions towards advancing local powers.

18. More work needs to be done towards adopting the new regular law on the

functioning of the municipal system, in order to make it commensurate with

international conventions on local governance.

12

VI. Annex

A. Programme of Workshop

Tenth Meeting of the Standing Technical Working Group: Expert Committee on Justice, Human Rights, and Law and Order Time Activity 9:30-9:45 Introductory Remarks:

Robert Curis, ECMI Country Director, and Hysni Bajrami, Chairman of the Justice Expert Committee

9:45-10:45 First Session: • Basic Labor in Kosovo, Blerim Burjani • Conclusions, Ali Bajgora • STWG Discussion

10:45-11:45 Second Session:

• Regulation on the Civil Service in Kosovo, Mary Venner

Head of Department for Civil Development Programme Manager, Civil Service Personnel Management Project

• Conclusions, Nexhmedin Sejdiu • STWG Discussion

11:45-12:15 Coffee Break and Snacks 12:15- 14:15 Third Session:

• Functioning of the Municipality System in Kosovo, Andrew Michels: Regulations 45 and 49

• Municipalities in Practice, Hysni Bajrami: • Conclusions, Gjylieta Mushkolaj • STWG Discussion

14:15-14:30

Adoption of Recommendations and Closing Remarks

14:30-16:30

Closing Lunch and Informal Discussion

13

B. List of Participants

Fifty-five members of the ECMI Standing Technical Working Group attended the

session. All communities of Kosovo/a were represented throughout the workshop and

preparatory Expert Committee meetings.

The Standing Technical Working Group

Name Affiliation 1 Hysni Bajrami Democratic Part of Kosovo (PDK) 2 Mevludin Krasniqi Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK) 3 Ruzhdi Hamza Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK) 4 Izet Sadiku Democratic League of Kosovo (LDK) 5 Alberta Troni Democratic League of Kosovo LDK 6 Ilir Salihu Democratic League of Kosovo LDK 7 Besnik Osmani Democratic League of Kosovo LDK 8 Valon Murati Alliance for the Future of Kosovo (AAK) 9 Gafurr Podvorica Liberal Party of Kosovo (PLK) 10 Nazmi Halimi Social Democratic Party of Kosovo

(PSDK) 11 Gjylnaze Syla Alliance for the Future of Kosovo AAK 12 Sebahate Grajqevci Alliance for the Future of Kosovo AAK 13 Sabrije Rama Alliance for the Future of Kosovo AAK 14 Mejreme Mara Berisha Alliance for the Future of Kosovo AAK 15 Fakir Spahiu Alliance for the Future of Kosovo AAK 16 Mehmed Ćeman Bosniac Social Democratic Association of

Kosovo (BSDAK) 17 Ruzdija Krijestorac Social Democratic Association (SDA) 18 Nebahat Doģan NGO ‘GUNES’ 19 Şerafetin Ömer Turkish Democratic Party (TDB) 20 Nexhmedin Sejdiu Kosovo Protection Corps (KPC) 21 Luan Jaha Unaffiliated 22 Ali Bajgora Unaffiliated 23 Gjylieta Mushkolaj Unaffiliated 24 Avdullah Qafani Egyptian Party 25 Ymer Shatri NGO ‘Handikos’ 26 Drita Bala Unaffiliated 27 Gani Toska Roma Party 28 Senad Adrovic Unaffiliated 29 Fahri Beqa Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK) 30 Diamant Kastrati Organization for Security and Co-operation

in Europe (OSCE) 31 Dragan Velic Serb National Council (SNC) 32 Fedzat Sagdati Organization for Security and Co-operation

in Europe (OSCE) 33 Ardian Jashari NGO ‘Economic Development Agency’

(EDA)

14

34 Halit Ferizi NGO ‘Handikos’ 35 Arbnor Pula NGO ‘Forum for Democratic Initiative’

(FID) 36 Mirlinda Kusari NGO ‘Women Business

Association’(SHERA) 37 Bersant Disha NGO ‘Kosovo Initiative for Democratic

Society’ (KIDS) 38 Ibrahim Makolli NGO ‘Council for Human

Rights’(KMDLNJ) 39 Enver Hasani Unaffiliated 40 Makfire Lutolli Unaffiliated 41 Suzana Arni NGO ‘Kosovo Civil Society Foundation’

(KCSF) 42 Bayram Rogova Turk NGO ‘SHEFKAT’ 43 Artan Venhari NGO ‘Kosovo Initiative for Democratic

Society’ (KIDS) 44 Fahredin Tahiri Unaffiliated 45 Petar Jeknic Unaffiliated 46 Mujo Dacic NGO ‘Bosniac Citizen Initiative’ (GIB) 47 Skender Kandic NGO ‘Bosniac Citizen Initiative’ (GIB) 48 Adem Limani Alliance for the Future of Kosovo (AAK) 49 Radmila Djordjevic Serb NGO ‘MARAS’ 50 Xhevdet Neziri Egyptian Party 51 Mirjana Rajovic Unaffiliated 52 Boban Nicic Unaffiliated 53 Abdullah Bektashi Turk NGO ‘Gunes’ 54 Bekim Sejdiu NGO ‘Kosovo Civil Society

Foundation’(KCSF) 55 Pavle Vasic Unaffiliated 56 Blerim Burjani Alliance for the Future of Kosovo (AAK) 57 Xhangyle Ilijazi Organization for Security and Co-operation

in Europe (OSCE) 58 Misket Sinani Organization for Security and Co-operation

in Europe (OSCE) 59 Valdet Muqa Unaffiliated 60 Naim Korca NGO ‘Handikos’ 61 Enesa Kadic Unaffiliated 62 Shkendije Geci Organization for Security and Co-operation

in Europe (OSCE) 63 Rezarta Alihajdari Democratic League of Kosovo (LDK) 64 Lendita Ajazaj Unaffiliated 65 Justina Pula Unaffiliated 66 Idriz Mumci Unaffiliated 67 Laura Kryeziu Unaffiliated 68 Lundrim Aliu Unaffiliated 69 Haxhi Thaci Organization for Security and Co-operation

in Europe (OSCE) 70 Veton Berisha Unaffiliated

15

71 Myrvete Pantina Unaffiliated 72 Afrim Maliqi NGO ‘Handikos’ 73 Elife Krasniqi NGO ‘Partners’ 74 Hajrullah Koliqi Unaffiliated 75 Radica Berisha Unaffiliated 76 Jovan Zivkovic Unaffiliated

Experts:

Name Organization 1 Xhevdet Smakiqi Ministry of the Environment and Public

Planning 2 Shefki Kurteshi Executive Secretary – Gjilan Municipality 3 Jakup Jahiri Chief Executive – Vitia Municipality 4 Naim Ismajli Chief Executive – Shtime Municipality 5 Baki Svirca Prime Minister’s Office 6 Nexhat Shabani Ministry for Public Services 7 Andrew Michels Former UNMIK Lawyer 8 Mary Venner Programme Manager, Civil Service

Personnel Management Project 9 Hafeez Ur Rehman Department of Local Administration 10 Khanas Kane Department of Local Administration,

Communities Office 11 Beth Miller American Bar Association, Central and

Eastern European Law Initiative (ABA/CEELI)

12 Ahmet Hasolli American Bar Association, Central and Eastern European Law Initiative (ABA/CEELI)

Press coverage of the event was provided by:

Radio and Television of Kosovo/a (RTK)

Koha Ditore and Koha TV

Radio and TV 21

16

C. Monitoring Report

1. Introduction Since the two-year mandate of the municipal structures that emerged from the first

elections held in October 2000 is in the long run, it is time to do an evaluation of the

functioning of Local Power in Kosova, which presents the legal ground for municipal

functioning.

Information also aims to give an overview of how municipal responsibilities are

exercised on the functioning of the municipal assemblies and committees, on the

organizational structures of municipalities, on the Municipal Civil Service, on the

municipal incomes, on citizen’s legal protection, on the functioning of the local

community office and on the relationship with municipal administrators. It also

presents the critical approach of some provisions of Regulation 45/2000 that are not in

the function of advancing the Local Power.

2. General Remarks on the Exercise of Powers in Municipalities The general conclusion as regards the transfer of powers from UNMIK structures to

local ones is that there is visible progress and that the powers have been transferred in

many areas. The progress is even more visible if we compare the current situation to

that of the previous year. Lately there has been transfer of powers in the field of

managing the currently employed staff in the registrar’s divisions of the

municipalities. The Municipal Directors are now responsible for running these

municipal services. The local staff now has the stamping power, which has resulted

in speeding up the procedures for issuing civil status certificates. However, there are

still many problems in the civil status area, which are a result of a lack of a Law on

Civil Status that would harmonize the criteria for keeping registrar’s books and for the

procedure of issuing certificates. There still remain some areas where the transfer is

not satisfactory, and these especially include budget management, procurement and so

on.

In every Municipality we asked whether the municipal administration exercises all the

powers prescribed by Article 3 of the Regulation Nr. 2000/45. Almost in every

municipality the response was that Municipalities were still facing limitations in

17

exercising powers stemming from Article 3.a, dealing with the provision of basic

preconditions for a sustainable economic development, those stemming from Article

3.f, dealing with local public and infrastructure services and then those stemming

from Article 3.h that deal with administering municipal property. There are other

problems in exercising powers prescribed in these provisions since the Municipal

powers do not have a clear concept of how to exercise them. The Regulation is also

unclear in defining what does ‘the provision of basic preconditions for a sustainable

economic development’ mean. Regulation Nr. 2000/49 on the Establishment of the

Administrative Department for Public Enterprises deprives the Municipalities of their

right to manage public municipal services and also deprives them of exercising the

power on administering municipal property. Even though Regulation 2000/45 states

that this is a responsibility of the Municipalities, other UNMIK Regulations reserve

this power for UNMIK administration.

As regards the conflict between the powers of central and local powers, the situation

has greatly changed as of January of this year with the introduction of the

Memorandums of Understanding on the transfer of powers in pre-school education,

primary and secondary education and primary health care. The municipalities are

now exercising most of the powers in these areas, although not all of them. Currently

there is conflict in the exercise of powers between central power and local powers in

the area of managing Municipal Public Services since there is full collision between

Regulation 2000/45 and Regulation 2000/49. Also, the management of forests and the

management of public property are issues that require practical solutions. Civil

registration is also an area in which municipal administrators have no approach, even

though citizens are mostly dissatisfied with the services offered in this area.

The local power has practically not exercised any administrative supervision in any of

the Municipalities in order to secure respect for the Law as prescribed in Article 3.5.

The relationship between the municipalities and villages and neighborhoods has in no

municipality been regulated by an agreement that would delegate the activities and the

powers of the municipalities. In fact, in some municipalities function local offices

that exercise some registrar’s functions, even though not in full, since these only

receive and complete the files and then a municipal servant from this office has to

18

sign and stamp them at the Municipal center. The Municipalities have been asked to

compile a list of activities and powers that can be delegated to local offices, so that the

latter can offer better services to the citizens.

Some municipalities have established village committees, or commissions (Skenderaj,

Shtime, Lypjan, Mitrovica, Deçan and Gllogoc) who deal with determining the

manner of cooperation between the Municipalities and villages. The Municipality of

Shtime provides a good example on how to establish proper relationship between

villages and the Municipality. It has established its villages committee, appointed

village leaders and made the relationship between the Municipality and the villages

official. In no other Municipality apart from the Municipality of Drenas do village

leaders receive remuneration, something that the local officials cite as an example of

not motivating village leaders for greater engagement.

Most of the municipalities have still not exercised any powers in giving names to the

streets, squares and other public places, powers that stem from Article 3 of the

Regulation 2000/45. In some cases, the new names have not been made official. In

many cases the signs telling the names of the streets have not been changed. The case

of Leposaviq Municipality is especially notable. The entrance to the Municipal Hall

bears a sign that reads “Republika Srbija – Skupstina Opstina Leposaviq” (The

Republic of Serbia – Municipal Assembly – Leposaviq). No other sign in this

Municipality shows that Leposaviq Municipality is a Kosovar Municipality. The

Municipal Administrator should have removed this sign from the entrance to the

building and placed a sign as prescribed by the UNMIK Regulation 2000/45 on the

Self-governance of Municipalities and the Constitutional Framework of Kosovo.

As of January 2000, after the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding, the

Municipalities have gained power to administer their primary health care sector.

According to the Municipal officials, the transfer of powers in this sector is

satisfactory. However, there were objections to the work of the districts (regional

centers), which often delay the process of payments and procurements, and in many

cases, limit the exercise of powers by the Municipalities. Also, many of the municipal

officials cite the problem of the surplus of health care staff in health centers, even

though there are some Municipalities where there is a lack of specialist doctors. Still,

19

many Municipal officials state that there is not so great a surplus, because the criteria

to determine the surplus are based on the 1981 population census, which does not give

an accurate account of the numbers of inhabitants in Municipalities. According to the

officials, the number of inhabitants is now much larger. Since Primary Health Care

will in January 2003 change to Family Health Care, the Municipal Directorates should

start with preparations to establish Main Family Health Care Centers and Field Family

Health Care Centers in their respective Municipalities.

The exercise of powers in the field of pre-school, primary and secondary education,

again based on the Memorandum of Understanding is, according to the municipal

officials, very satisfactory. As of September 2002, the Municipalities will be in

charge of managing the educational staff in their territory. However, there were many

objections addressed to Education Officials appointed by the Ministry of Education

who often limit the powers of the Municipal Directorates for Education. They also

very often monitor and inspect the work of the Municipal Directorates for Education.

This area, just like the Primary Health Care, suffers from politically motivated

dismissals and re-appointments of staff, as a result of understanding the process of

staff management as an unlimited right for changes in the staffing structure.

The exercise of powers in the area of providing public services and infrastructure,

which includes water supply, sewerage, road maintenance, local transport and so on is

generally one of the weakest points in all the Municipalities. Even though Regulation

Nr. 2000/49 on the Establishment of the Administrative Department for Public

Enterprises is in head-on collision with Regulation 2000/45 and has created total

confusion as regards the relationship between the Municipalities and the Kosovar

public enterprises, the Municipal administration has failed to take the necessary

measures to improve this relationship. Each Municipal Assembly should, through a

local regulation, establish what types of services should public enterprises provide,

establish the obligations for both parties, the citizens and the public enterprises,

establish fines for different types of violations and also establish inspecting

mechanisms. The public enterprises should also be obliged to submit their budget to

the municipality for approval. This should all be done by 1 December 2003 at latest,

in conformity with Article 40.1 of Regulation 2000/45.

20

Even though some municipalities have made efforts to regulate these issues by issuing

local regulations, they have not been successful because they lacked a clear concept of

what does provision of public services include and also lacked proper mechanisms to

enforce the regulations. They were also not applying the applicable Laws (most of

them are not aware of the existence of these laws). Again, this area suffers from the

same disease as education and health. The municipalities have mostly concentrated

on the issues of managing public enterprises, which mostly means appointments or

dismissals of the managers of the enterprises, dismissals that are usually politically

motivated. Such is for example the case in Prizren where the “Higjieno – Teknika”

public enterprise, in charge of cleaning the town, is doing a fine job, making Prizren

one of the cleanest towns in Kosovo. Despite this fact, the Municipal authorities are

not happy with the manager of this enterprise and have done nothing to improve their

relationship with the enterprise. Of course, these on-goings reflect negatively on the

provision of cleaning services, provision of drinking water, sewerage management

and other issues vital to the well being of the citizens.

Most of the Municipalities have established their Supervisory Boards but the manner

of their organization, their structure and the number of the members of the boards

differs Municipality to Municipality. In some Municipalities these boards have been

established by the Municipal Assemblies, in others by the Administrative

Departments for Public Utilities and in others yet the boards have been established by

internationals. A new Law should be issued in order to solve this problem and the

problem of the collision between Regulations 2000/45 and 2000/49. In some

Municipalities, as for example in the Municipality of Pristina, there is no clear idea as

to how many enterprises operate in the Municipality and there is often a mix-up of

public and private enterprises in the administrative procedures. No Municipality has

asked the former public enterprises to re-register and nowhere in the Municipalities

have we found documents that prove the act of the establishment of the public

enterprises. These are often documents that have been issued by Municipal

Assemblies in the period between 1988-1990 and are applicable because they have

not been superseded by any other Regulation.

One of the most sensitive areas in the Municipalities is the exercise of powers in the

management of municipal property (Article 3, point 3.1 h of Regulation 2000/45).

21

The management of this property is, in general, the weakest point in the functioning

of the local authorities. Almost all Municipalities have problems in properly defining

municipal property, something that would facilitate the proper identification of this

property and would help keep it under protection. No Municipality has still been able

to complete the registration of municipal property, be it land or buildings. In many

Municipalities, municipal property has been manipulated and appropriated in various

ways, either during the period of the abolishment of Kosovar autonomy or after the

war of 1999. Very little has been done in reviewing the grounds on which property

was appropriated. The number of property contests in the Courts on reclaiming

property is still very low, there are no attorneys who deal with these issues and some

Municipalities lack proper bodies that would deal with these issues. The Monitoring

Division has made it obligatory for Municipalities to submit the Administrative

Decisions together with the number of property cases in the courts to the DLA. We

also required from Municipalities to identify all the cases of illegal appropriation of

land and to come up with a list of municipal buildings that are rented to other entities,

together with the income that is being made from the rent.

None of the Municipalities have reported to DLA so far to ask for approval when

renting Municipal property for a term of more then 10 years, in conformity with

Article 44.2 of Regulation 2000/45.

Illegal construction is a largely spread occurrence in all the Municipalities, especially

in larger towns such as Pristina for example. The Municipalities have so far failed to

give the problem the serious treatment it deserves. The strategy to fight illegal

construction should be to first of all identify the illegally constructed buildings that

should in no way be legalized, and then establish the criteria by which construction

licenses should be issued.

In some Municipalities there is criticism on behalf of the police, who, according to the

Municipal officials, are not doing enough to help in the fight against illegal

construction. A typical example is the Municipality of Drenas, where the Court has

issued a decision on demolishing an illegally constructed building but the decision has

not been executed yet because the international administration of the Municipality

does not provide the necessary assistance to the Municipal officials.

22

3. The Functioning of Municipal Assemblies and Committees Apart from the Municipalities of Lypjan and Shterpce, all other Municipalities have

established the obligatory committees. The Municipality of Shterpce may be excused

for not having established a committee yet on the grounds that the inclusion of the

Serb community in that municipality started fairly late, but there is no excuse for the

Municipality of Lypjan, especially bearing in mind that other communities that live in

this Municipality (Croat, Roma and Ashkali) have since the beginning been involved

in the Municipal Assembly of Lypjan Municipality.

In all the meetings of the Municipal Assemblies where there are members from other

communities, the invitation to the meetings and the materials for the meetings are

send in their respective languages. There are also interpreters who interpret all the

discussions in the meetings.

In some Municipalities, such as in Peja, Viti, Gllogoc, Skenderaj, Podujeva, the

Committees on Policy and Finance have members that are not Assembly members

that is contrary to Article 21.4. It seems that this Article has been misinterpreted. A

typical example is that of Viti Municipality in which 5 civil servants are embers of the

Committee on Policy and Finance.

Almost all municipalities have established committees for most important issues. In

some cases these committees are provisional, and in others they are permanent.

These committees also have members that are not members of Municipal Assemblies.

In none of the municipalities did the committees for intermediation submit reports to

the municipal assemblies for contests on ethnic grounds, even though in some cases

there were cases of contests that should have been reported. The overall impression is

that the Municipal officials still do not have it clear what the role of this committee is

and do not know which cases should this committee treat.

Except for the cases of Municipalities of Viti and Malisheva, in other municipalities

the chairpersons of the meetings of the municipal assemblies have never used their

right to the extra vote, in cases where there is a tie of votes when voting for or against

23

a motion in the Municipal Assembly. The chairperson of Malisheva Municipality has

used his right to an extra vote when dealing with the issue of allocation of the lands

owned by his Municipality whereas the chairperson of Viti Municipality has used his

right to an extra vote when deciding on the appointment of a Director of a Municipal

Directorate.

When it comes to the activities of the Municipalities in issuing local regulations, that

regulate issues and procedures within the scope of the powers of the municipalities,

the situation differs from municipality to municipality. Some municipalities have

issued a considerable number of local regulations. Numbers of local regulations

issued in municipalities range from 2-4 such as in the case of Novoberda (Artana) and

Decan municipalities, up to 10 local regulations such as in the case of some other

municipalities. In general, it is obvious that there is a lack of experience and

professionalism in drafting these regulations.

In most of the municipalities there is no transparency in the process of drafting and

issuing of these regulations. In some municipalities, such as in Gjakova, Istog

(Burim) and Shtime, there is public discussion prior to issuing local regulations.

However, despite the clear willingness and good intent on the part of these

municipalities to have proper public discussions, the discussions lack in substance.

There are no cases in any of the municipalities when issues and comments raised in

the public discussions were incorporated into the final drafts of the regulations. The

issue of transparency should however be given a more serious treatment because it

allows the active involvement of the citizens, professional institutions, NGOs, groups

of interest and professionals of different profiles who would, by giving their ideas and

opinions, improve the quality of the local regulations of the municipalities.

The situation with local regulations in the so-called ‘Serb enclaves’ is very different.

These still use administrative decisions and regulations issued in the time of the Serb

administration of Kosovo and they are based on Serbian legislation. These

municipalities completely disregard UNMIK Regulations.

Municipalities also differ in the manner of remuneration for members of their

assemblies and municipal assembly committees. Some municipalities use an estimate

24

pay rate, whereas others pay per-diems for each meeting. However, the amounts

provided are always within the pay limits approved by the DLA.

4. The Organizational Structure

The organizational structure also differs in each Municipality. Some Municipalities

like that of Shtime for example, have 6 Directorates, whereas others have 12, as do

Pristina and Podujeva.

The Statutes of the municipalities should determine the number of municipal

directorates, the duties of the directors, terms of reference and the term of office for

the directors of municipal directorates. It is very interesting that in some

municipalities the directorates are not organized even as sectors in the internal

structure of the municipalities, in comparison to some other municipalities where for

example the directorates for public services, the directorates for emergency or the

ones for property are properly established and have the due status. Such a

heterogeneous structure of organization creates complications in the vertical line of

communication between the central authority and the local authorities.

Some municipalities have municipal ombudsperson offices that are usually attached to

one of the directorates, even though they should be separate offices that would not fall

under the authority of any of the directors. This would preserve the function and the

authority of the Ombudsperson, as a person that protects the interests of the

municipality.

5. The Municipal Civil Services The number of civil servants within Municipalities is usually within the limits

prescribed by the Central Fiscal Authority. Many of the Municipalities have,

immediately after the elections, published job adverts, whether internal or external, in

order to re-appoint or re-recruit staff, which goes contrary to Article 52 of Regulation

2000/45. According to this rule, the staffs that were appointed in accordance with the

provisions and procedures in force before the elections are not subject to re-

recruitment procedures.

25

Even though the staffing procedures are in general respected, in practice not much

regard was paid to the issue of professionalism and experience of the people who

were being employed. There was also disregard for the principle of political neutrality

and very often the re-recruitment processes have been politically motivated. We also

encountered many cases of nepotism, such as in the Municipality of Lypjan for

example, and this is true both for the Board of Directors and for lower civil servants.

All this results in having incompetent staff working in the Municipalities. Often the

staff are not familiar with the general administrative procedures, which results in long

delays in carrying out the administrative work. This emphasizes the need to have

proper training for the staff on board, especially for those staff members that are in

charge of dealing with administrative procedures.

6. Municipal Revenues All the municipalities have issued local regulations that deal with the issue of local

taxes and duties. These include the revenues collected from the payment of licenses

and other sorts of payments required by the municipalities, those collected from

municipal assets, from fines and from the percentage on fines [sic]. The

Administrative Direction Nr. 2001/23 issued by the DLA and CFA determines those

areas in which municipalities can levy taxes and duties for the services they offer.

According to this Direction, before a Municipal Regulation on Taxes can take effect,

it has to be certified by the DLA and the CFA. So far Regulations of Fushe Kosova,

Shterpce, Leposaviq, Rahovec, Z. Potok and Zvecan have not been certified. The

local regulations of Rahovec and Shterpce are in the process of being certified. The

intention of the Administrative Direction is to protect the citizens from having to pay

high taxes and also harmonize the amount of tax payments in all the municipalities.

However, this Direction has several shortcomings; although it gives a list of the areas

where taxes should be collected, it fails to give limits for the amounts of those taxes,

therefore leaving it to the discretion of the DLA and the CFA to decide whether the

local regulations will be certified. Also, the legal grounds for this Direction are very

questionable.

The central authority has, in 2001, performed independent financial audits in 20

municipalities. This was done either by the CFA or by UNMIK Regional

26

Administration. Since financial management still falls under powers reserved for

UNMIK, the overall request of the municipal officials was that the process of transfer

of these powers should be speeded up. It is necessary to require an independent

financial audit, in conformity with Article 43 of the Regulation 2000/45, mainly for

two reasons: a) to verify whether there is a proper financial management in place,

which would then show whether the municipal civil service has the capacity to

implement the financial procedures and audits, and b) based on the evaluation

resulting from the financial audits, the authority for financial administration should be

transferred to those municipalities that fulfill the criteria, also set out in Article 46 of

Regulation 2000/45.

7. Appeals and Legal Protection Almost in all municipalities there are cases when citizens submit appeals against the

administrative decisions of the municipality. Acting on the appeal, the Chief

Administrators of the municipalities have usually certified the administrative

decisions, without checking the legality of these decisions. This diminishes the

authority of the Chief Executives as people who should protect the rights of the

citizens. In conformity with Article 35.3 of Regulation 2000/45, those who submit

appeals should submit them to the central level authorities, which are in turn obliged

to review a decision and decide on its legality. Usually, the central authority in cases

of contests, including urban, construction, property, labor and other contests, is the

DLA and not the respective Ministry. This however means that the appeals are often

not reviewed at all or are decided upon incompetently. Thus, it is necessary that

respective ministries start dealing with the appeals on administrative procedures.

In none of the municipalities have we come across cases when the Chief Executives

are dismissed from dealing with certain cases in which they or members of their

family have personal or financial interests, something that should be done in

compliance to Article 32.1 of Regulation 2000/45. The same is true for Directors of

Municipal Directorates.

8. Local Municipal Offices In some Municipalities, such as in Gjilan, Lypjan, Skenderaj, Obiliq-Kastriot, Istog-

Burim, Prizren and Dragash) local Municipal offices have been established. Some of

27

the municipalities also established local community offices. People who run these

offices are members of the Boards of Directors and attend the meetings of these

Boards. Apart from the officials of the Municipality of Pristina, officials of other

municipalities told us that they do not have access to the work of these offices, that

they never had a chance to visit them and that they are not aware of the functions and

the duties of these offices. Also, apart from the Chief Executive of the Municipality

of Pristina who states that these offices do not conduct parallel activities, all other

Chief Executives are concerned that these offices perform parallel administrative

services, such as Registrar’s services, issuing travel documents and so on.

The approach of the Municipal Administrator of Obiliq-Kastriot Municipality is to be

applauded since he has started integrating these offices into the administrative

structure by allocating the staff of these offices to municipal directorates. The local

offices will be closed, since there is no more need for their existence. Other

Municipal Administrators should adopt the same approach since the security situation

has now greatly improved. Lack of security was the main reason why these offices

were established.

9. The Powers of the Municipal Administrator The relationship between Municipal Administrators and the local administration is

generally one of cooperation and coordination. However, in 12 Municipalities

(Skenderaj, Gjakova, Peja, Decan, Obiliq, Mitrovica, Vushtrri, Lypjan, Kamenica,

Pristina and Drenas) the Municipal Administrators have used their powers stemming

from Article 48 to suspend some of the decisions of the local administration and of the

municipal assemblies. This mainly happened in cases of appointments and dismissals

of senior employees. In Pristina for example, the municipal administrator used this

power in the cases of the appointment of the Director of ‘Higjieno-Teknika’

enterprise, the Director of the Health House, the Director of the ‘ABC Cinema’ and

the Director of the Directorate for Budget and Finance. In Lypjan, this happened in

the case of the appointment of the Director of the Public Municipal Enterprise

‘Vllaznimi’, and in many other appointments.

Such interventions from the Municipal Administrators are welcome in cases when

they use their powers to ensure respect for the Law and for the administrative

procedures. However, in some cases there seems to be no justification or legal

28

grounds for such interventions. Such is the case of the Municipal Administrator in

Kamenica Municipality who has twice in a row suspended the decision of the

Municipal Assembly on the Municipal Day. It is still unclear what were the legal

grounds used when this Municipal Administrator appointed the Director of the Health

House.

During the visits that we conducted, we have required from municipal administrators

to notify the local administrators in written of their decisions and the reasons for using

their powers to veto. Municipal administrators should also suggest measures for the

execution of their decisions. This should ensure the validity of their decisions. For

example, Pristina Municipal Administrator has suspended the Director of the

Directorate for Economy and Finance of Pristina Municipality, but the latter has

continued to exercise his functions. We also have a case in Leposaviq Municipality

where the Municipal Administrator has never used his powers, even though the

municipal administration of this municipality has never respected and implemented

UNMIK Regulations, and the whole municipality functions parallel to the existing

system of administration.

In most of the municipal assemblies functioning in municipalities that house

communities, the SRSG has, in conformity with Article 47.3 of Regulation 2000/45,

appointed additional Assembly members in order to ensure the representation of all

the communities. In the Municipalities of Leposaviq, Z. Potok and Zvecan, all

Municipal Assembly members are appointees. The SRSG has not suspended any

members of any of the Municipal Assemblies because of misconduct. Also, there are

no cases of suspensions of any civil servants because of the failure to perform or

because of illegal conduct.

This background report was prepared by: Mr Hysni Bajrami, Chair of the Expert Committee on Justice, Human Rights, and Law and Order