___ lI_____�_,_K_ _ _ ____:_ ___�u __;___EI _ _ _ Ji ¢ D�_ __ _ .m�m_kmkn Mh %:'__ _I upM M my Mmm1 _Mwh~h�MMh92 mum�1 %W M m�gm_n H __�TW_w_Mm �Hmm,�» _ rm H�hnmmam N__ 3 W= * I _ _h WmM_M_Mm_w_MMH%%muMm_WMmWM" M� hm"__m¢m¢__ Eh_m___mD__d_mv_mH__W_m_._rM_�_£m_w_92{N m3M*wMw%�$1Mgm fa� j:%mLk�m��$lw%H%§MwW H H W as �B __�j__ f_�h__ M Lu� Em H' �r gum v�_�_____tmhM___MM mg: wmmmmwmmmm ?mhMhmmmw"_Fn_ an M __ Ht M H __ 1 _h" ____ H "W_ gm W MEN WM �Wm mm_mMW_MmWm_mWMm%MmMmm%mh�W%"____W~_ hm" ___m_____mmmMMMé l é Mun�r_M�A_mFMh%MMhh:M�_mwm_%%m m_mmMMW@"_%wWm_0/1� __� I� uh� F: 0 H_____H ___*_ _* ____H �W _�NE A_a P __ __� __ ___ _�I7 Q,i_:�M _MW�m_D�Wmm�A�IHJ�92_WEWRIM1OC92ii_ I92 _'_ I Z _% M h%w__%iW_�_m�_M_%hr mam� hgmmwmw _ __ *_____ m__r_ 3u . J� _"mm__, _._ __2� m___ �____a w �J _mdui _92%_.V_'_& A_ _ _�-tM ___L_��i __ __, Q� __a___ Y __ _� W�mi _, %W_mum _ W M H_W m N H4

' -.___ -_ ..._-= -a-... -��~: �' 1; ~~~ ��__�----¢� ~ - _�1:~;�1�_-Q-A�: xii ~- .. -~ s e; i-,-J.-=9-,- - -_.-~_.-. .4. .____.. A11. _..v.,_ _._,_ _o __

�IA ' .

U. .1 I Mr�I Hr

.�-II r.

? Mr. �ursons. _�gapitol Stuff 7��.__¢" 1111". .92mm__..

' /rt By John O'Donnellv/ git! Tl

H NV 1�s¢rI1v �Qua- Julv..... ........_., -......., --,,

washin¢ton-- -0&#39;-&#39;1 ----Gonstan Reader nolitely snarls; ou&#39;re so damne<

i [&#39;-

Belmont�Mhhf .._._

Tr-1ttcr_____

Mr. Nense_.__. Roo I&#39;IL_.--.

l/

self-centered, always bellowing awa with your own bigoted, out-of-date idea:

that you never give yourself time to sten to what others have to say."

well, here&#39;s a copy of a letter �hi landed in the White House and sent

to the Cap Stuff mailbag, It was sent by N.Y. State Republican Watson.

Washburn, a distinguished lawyer who supportedPEisenhower to the hiltboth his white House campaigns. He wrote the - esident:

ll

Truman Administrations was the degradation of the U Supreme Court, The

people confidently expected you to rectify this shameful situation. I hope

you are as shocked as they certainly are by your calamitous failure-

One of the most shocking indecenies Perpet:atedShE>the Roosevelt-in

92|0

Your

appointee as Chief Justice quickly and permanently allied himself with.the

two left wing_extremists, Black and Douglas. In 1952, it seemed impossible

that the court could sink any lower in the estimation of lawyers and laymen;

but since you took office it has done so. What is most alarming is that it

has become increasingly bold week by week in giving aid and comfort to the

"ommunist enemy in our midst. E9 curb the present dictatorial temper of the

court majority it seems that a Constitutional amendment is needed, which woul. . . ,

deny protection to any person refusing to answer_queati9n§�lgegagdiggsghe

participation or membership of any other person in a cons9I�Ho¥�t%*§id any

- *~"~>* *1-I--1-31-n-e-uni--1|-���� -~�,,,--~....- ;~....- -..~ 1, _ A .._,____V _ ___ __ _

n-It Rev. a-�r-as!

/

f7?64lJUL 291957

i I , Knock out the Warren court&#39;s ruling that the Smith.»if

r

&#39; -c

t J _ . . ACOURThe American &#39;Bar Association� lg Londonyesterday, an important Am committee got up -.and kicked the Earl Warre prams Court riihtp

in the teeth. i;j:_" ,- The groupwas the 192BA&#39;sCon1- -mitten on, Communist Tacties;_jStrategy and S Objectivesgi Chit�! -&#39;man, former Maryland Sen. Her-&#39;bert R. 0�Conor. 4 _-:--f-

0&#39;Co_nor and his_ colleagues eturned in a detailed report keyed__.&#39;to the proposition that the Warren &#39;court is imperiling the nation;-by.;being too concerned about Com"-munistsi theoretical rights. Thereport calls on Congress for legiola;

tion aihilch would simply! wage out_&#39;_,-c w-M» i.�..$�..�»�.°.1é�.&#39;%§..�.�."§f�.� 3� F-1

-L, This legislation would: S .4, . *_£_&#39;;,&#39;.. If--; &#39;-&#39; - Keep FBI �les con�dential; _�-7 P __ �#1� - �__- , -&#39;1" ?_ .Let Congressional committees investigate suspected" iubversives as freely as they investigate businessmen andlabor leaders; S &#39; &#39; l- &#39; " - "" ;- iU - Allow the Government to �re security risks even out *

of non-sensitive public jobs; -- - � - ~- -&#39;4 -&#39; &#39;1I &#39; Permit the Justice Department to query _about-to-be-

deported aliens on their connections with Communism;

Act of 1940 allows people to urge the Government&#39;s violentovertl�row so long as they don�t spell out how it is to beover rown; �~ ~i &#39; e. " .�_ .1

Empower schools, colleges, bar associations, ete., todeny employment or membership to persons who refuse toanswer questions about past Communist activities. &#39;~ ow er _ _-_ �*-

The_0�C<;nor]c]omniittee �accuses the V_Varrei1 iéobué-t--in !ceremonious ega anguage, u 1 meaning can� mis-

I.lIJdl?�St0gd-�Of setting up d��&#39;e¬El1&#39;ié standards its li!&#39;2;l;- ..&#39;?n..?:.:.;%�.&#39;.&#39;:�;;�;.*..�f"?"* �?� st � "ii �P lP rtThe report noses the greatdglga "in them-:1 U. Sipommunilst _a y over these ecisions, an e spe wit which t e lparty is rebuilding, now that it has been saved by the }_ an-en court from the knockout punch the Justice Depart-

� - � 5, �menthadhopedtodealit. *1. r

gollrqgcoul th Shag! Jii�glit Ylsgren himself is at� 3&#39; e on on mee mg.-Y &#39;3. ._&#39;;_=...-, °n_�m-Inge� 1�. .1 _That _fact points up the courage 5I; these lawyers show in turning in this report._ _l_921any of .=rthe1_n will be handling cases 1n_the Supreme Court in flltl.ll&#39;�.�.;A11 of them mustknow that Judges can be and sometimes .are as humanly vindictive as anybody else. Yet they have "tJ .

- ormed this public service regardless of the harm itmay do to them personally."-i e _ -_~,»&#39; - s ; &#39; -i ;§lo. &#39; Now that this committee �oi the powerful and iniluen-"&#39;tial American Barakssociation has uttered, it is much to be 7hoped that Congress many it not most of whose members &#39;W lawyers! will show similar courage at this session. " 1.. There is a �clear and present danger.� as lawyers put

it, that the Warren court will strike down all otour legaldefenses against the criminal Communist conspiracy�; ~&#39;= �-&#39;"-1.: The court already has gone much too r along the &#39;_l�0l¢1- Qllly Uollkress reverse thisaperiloig-0renI._ g _ _ It iafi__ ... . for to get cracking, :,_?,_-e. .._; at-,k:- �._..: .|_ AV . _� .� _ ., .

r wl " W � " " " %~�� i-&#39;*-� �-�~��---3------�--__----�W..a_v. ._____

"£;�18I.t:z£Bonrdmen __...__.Belmont __i_

Mohr ___i_

Persona __._....Roaen __.._....

Tulnm ___..__-_

Trotter __,__,i__Neon .__.____..._

Tele. Boom __.__

I-iollomun __.._

Grinch� ____.___

cg -.

1ii�&#39;/

_" J�. /-�r

951

�

/l-_;~92__

Wash. Post and

Times I-ieruld

Wash. News .__._.,__.__

Wash. Stur ____i__

N. Y. Herald ...i__.__.._

Tribune

N. Y. Journal-_____

American

N. Y. Mirror

N. Y. Daily rmN. Y. Times ..._____

Dally Worker _.____.._...__

The Worker _.____.____

New Leader .._____._..

1._�-i__

5..t..-"Tl___eg.,.__§ 6 ~ S

I.a�I

92-

,, .

�K

tr. Q~f_ .

�AT

,_ .,_.-W" .

._-_-; ,_ � &#39; _

-»___

&#39;.i¢?."&#39;

-.<-

E� 1&#39;-

�t.�._!;&#39;.&#39;/.- -lg" -" 1- ;.&#39;.-. _ --L»

: .;;&#39;.._;:- -iv-.-"

_T-..&#39;--4�-as�iv�. .__h_!_

;;".:~ I S

&#39;1&#39;" .-

-us»

&#39; ii

5"ll -.

J./&#39;

1|

0- I9 Rev. I-7-56!

. 1

Jurlsts Look at Supreme Qour _ !�ii&#39;e_f�.!us��tLic1.ei_�s&#39;.of sréil-5 frihuoohi� � 4 i

O 0

&#39;=-oi -- - .~..-.-. - v

,6 &#39; Reporteci "Cr:t:c::3::g ,T.-c::sgres$:o::s&#39;.1 Criticism �om la.y_men_ai1dlawyers conceroipliburecentdecision! -of th "- reme�oggg o! the Unita £551

ail lately _.been attractingmuch attention, but how dosome oi the Judges throu:h-out the country ieel aboutthe highest coitrt? &#39;i �There are not man! ODDO!-tunities for Judges to discussthese matters publicly. But�something that occurred theother day at the conferencefor the chler justices� or thehighest courts of each oi! theso States throws a light onthis question. A substantialnumber oi the State chi�&#39;]ustices favored a resolutioncondemnlns in the severestterms some or the recent de-cisions oi the Supreme Courtof the United Btatcs.

"&#39;i:&#39;lereistheiuiitcXtoit&#39;ne�resolution o�ered by Chic!Justice orman 1&#39;. Arter-

of ilhc Supreme Court�tndianar .-1.» �._�Be it resolved, that it is., r opinion that the UnitedStates Supreme Court hastransgressed sound lcsalprinciples, and in particular,usurped tact �ndln: func-tlons in wel�linl the evi-dence in the recent cases oi�_Konigsherg v. State Bar -orCalifornia and schware v.Board of Bar Examiners 01the State oi New Mexico .1 �Moreover, the UnitedStates Supreme Court hasencrceched or-on the i"..ri:dlc=tion oi the State courts inholding. amon: other things,that applicants seeking ad-7mission to the bars oi theStats oi California and NewMexico. in examination as to

[their character and �tncsajoat-actice law in those respec-

- ve Ststes.&#39;h1sy refuse to In-�&#39; " sti &#39; colic

his e�ii�-Elna &#39;aE:92i�ttheir, past connectionsat "-istions in iIrif�uii&#39;_&#39;:i.l.|_ia�s_I"_ Communists and_oom~an istic organizations. l...5». We declare the past acts

J~il�..l_!_&#39;Q¢.1&§{_,

X

1

cant! do re�ect directly upontheir character and �tnessand are matters relevant torconside_ration._ Whether ornot one who went throuah along economic &#39; depressionshould have had the strengthoi character. moral �ber and

stamina to withstand theemotional appeals _ Com-munistl_�»as m�lt 800d citi-zens� d!d�or evlsether as� =weairiing he succumbs to suchPropaganda. is relevant. inthe analysis and determina-tion of the character of suchindividuois. The Uni tedStates Supreme -Court iswrons "in holdina that suchacts are oi no value in suchdetermination, x &#39; . . T

"Decisions which are notfounded on sound legs] prin-ciples or common sense tendto ilndennine con�dence inthe ludlcisl system and� re-&#39;spent Ior the courts." "

�We iurther state that onewho is unwilling to give freelyall relevant information re?-��carding his history and pintassocistions casts doubts up-on his moral character and�tness to practive law in anyState of this Union; and suchrefusal is a. relevant factor tobe weighed and considered bya. tact �nding body on char-�acter and ilitness. We furtherdeclare that although eUnited States Supreme Cohas the authority to �xown standards _o! characand �*-rin to practice in theFederal courts we do not rec- "ozone nor concede thairltmay do so for the courts orthe several States of thisUnion."-_ M" s --

Whilc . almost� _a niaioritytavored immediate adoption,oi the resolution. there were�a �number of Justices _who were".in sympathy with it but felt "that the subject should awatti" ��¥§P°� "Pm 392&#39;=.�=.°��ii&#39;.�Y.-&#39;r-&#39;i rnouon was mace to ap mg":a committee to report Ifto the conference next tiand the resolution which ac�

the chic! Justices 81&#39;!much concerned with whatho Szror-...-:&#39;.c "-to-..~"t �_ %United States had ruled;

dscided- by the Supreme�Oourt oi! the United Btli��

Ian dissented. In fact. JusticeHarlan, in his lenttily dia-

. sent, wound hp with this ob-

ierzaitionz �For _ roe. -toda�acceptable intrusion into Qmatter oi� State concern.". J»

Many. Americans oi thepresent day do not realise

&#39; that criticism oi the SupremeCourt has been trequentl;expressed in past history and.

~. that perhaps the most severe�castigation the high courtever got came from the penoi Thomas Je�erson. In aletter to a friend in 1820,

- he wrote: - i;, "Having found, from ea-

perience. that impeachmentis an" impracticable thing, amere scare-crow, they con-p�sider themselves secure toglite; they skull: i&#39;rorn T689057

. siialiity to public opinion. .-.�-An opinion is huddled up

. conciave, perhaps by.a inlorlt! oi one, delivered asunanimous, and with thlent acquiescence offir-.111 sssosistes, hype c fchief Judge, who sop _

-&#39; cstes the law to his ll;bytheturnothisownreaesoning." . i .. _<

llhnlodilctiah Riahta I-leer!!!!If -�w

"éi.2.75Z.§�-J.I 1401&#39; RECORDEDHliaui s. 1952.

__*

� 2 F &#39;-if E:-"_. .. go�!

As for the decision in thilKonigsberi case to which;reference was made, this was,

phyla 8-to-3 vote. Justic�Frankrurter. Clark and Har-

92

..

92

. siI!

TolsonNicholsBoordmooB4&#39;l_1--0a.|I1uus-nu. i

Mohr

Parsons ...._._..Fiosen _.__.____

Tomm _.._.__..Trotter

Nedae __.._._.�__..Tole. Boom _.;._.Hollomdn -..____

Gond�i

6...... , ..

W

W?�J

Wash. Post and

Times Herald

Wash. News

Wash. Star _.B.;{_3___N. �I�. Herold

Tribune

N. Y. Journal-.____

American

N. Y. Mirror W

N. Y. Dolly News

�_.

D�

E

.1

92.&#39;.�::i&#39;. -;-1- ~.-..&#39;.-.._.-.7. ; 92_ ,> _ __»._._,r?.-swig.�

�_ .~,.,,.-.92 92-

:iT;:&#39;7~5*-__&#39;.=-- ..a

:1�-.&#39; -- &#39;-I,

gggi-. �� �92� -M

� "� W;

~39--.

___...A-� 17 -;92.;-- -���~ ~~~&#39;� -- �~ 1- V-g -� ~� _ --��p_�������W~»�- � � �_ . 7 -1- &#39; � ,_,,@._-.,..-4-._-4.A_-if-.-..-......_...._-__.-. ..

0-20 0

,/

Z�.>¬.&#39;%~;£"M i Boa:-dm

. Patrons _._

. Roman -i.Mr. Tamm __i.Mr. Trotter .iMr. Noun __._ :Tole. Room _i

Mr. Hollomun _.._Miss Gcmdy i

K I s

if am- - -r -:.-.&#39;l,;.~4.-. .�-- , _;~_ 3:-if -w-3-;,� -4 ~ 4*; I» 92 -I-" i

cm

w% Belmont _@r. Molar -__._

MrMr

. V s .A -- .&#39; s - -s -- _-was -�-"Y*-&#39;*--"�*"-T"�W_?;?f�~&#39;J�""&#39;�"""&#39;1"&#39;¢""1&#39;?*-�F&#39;?"?"*�T"""&#39;-s�:"**�~""" &#39; -� �_ | -- "&#39;1 � ,"92 w� 4 "� � � b &#39; " &#39; &#39;g r . mm£mzAr1Pm.:�f&#39;

- imohnxsz -" �| -~s > . saws K

h..., -

�x�! :_

~_.. .�3 . +&#39;

� :11"-�.Q3;--

URITY crxoss or corcnzss, THE FBI nun GOVERNMENT MAGENCIES. ,92 . . . L * I . _ - _,. - ~ ; -L," .s nossnt noanxs SAID THE COURT� ~ A "1 s ACTION IN THE cast or LABOR,LADER JOHN T wnrxxu 92

R -J-*-THE srusrz INTERNAL szcunxrv suaconu1r1zs&#39;s curs; couws LI §§R%§¥E;&A_ SEC nuaxsronnv wxrn �AGGRESSIVE ACTIVITY" raar rngzarsu. . s was AN UNBRIDLED zrrohr BY THE Jun1c1anx7�§¥&#39;*#* *I<T0 nova xwro THE LEGISLATURE� -&#39; - - s� - »s~ �A *M� s nomnxu . . ._ 92»�;F-s:_|§ as Rzrznnzn TO run couRT&#39;s nzvznssi or THE couvrcrxou or THE wFsrs- »5jMIDWEST LABOR LEADER FOR CONTEMPT or coucnsss. wafxxus nan nrruszn 1~QFTO TELL THE HOUSE UN-AHERICKN, V s. mu: counr RULED Tsar-wnrK1us&#39;*&#39; 1"rsxvncv nan BEEN VIOLATED IN A

ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE THE NAMES or-I -s� &#39;PERSONS HE I- NEH to as comuuzsr ._ , CONGRESSIONAL EFFORT at :xPosun:;:,;,,-;ron :xPosun£&#39;s&#39;sAx:. A _ I -&#39;~ -.,a&#39;1�. SPEECH on A NEH;,HAMTI-communist TELEVISION PROGRAM CALLED �ZERO-1960!� on STATION y 2.UATV xu uzwanx, THE PROGRAM 1s SPONSORED BY THE BLUE ARMY or oua &#39;:&#39;m. >�LADY or FATIMA, A RELIGIOUS novznzur con -P H

. r -MORRIS TOOK xssuz wxrn Ti: couRr&#39;s&#39;RuL1uc x�&#39;a &#39; " »"?"&#39;*1. _;

_ __ _ _ DUCTING A CRUSADE OF_ PRAYER -:11-"OR PEACE T0 COMBAT COMMUNISM &#39; � V &#39; &#39; &#39; V� . 0-� - Yk § , �UNLESS THE coucnzss nozs SOMETHING to ASSERT ITS POWER Acaxusr,_s_ ;THIS AGGRESSIVE ACTIVITY UN THE PART or THE susnrns counr ra£u:1;¢>�,<HAx ;FEAR van? GREATLY ron THE INTERNAL szcunxrv runc11ons_ uo% ONLY s§¢;:_;sor THE concnrss BUT ALSO or THE FBI AND was SECURITY icz~c1:s_g@b;gsa¬+s-. HE GOVERNMENT,:vMQRRl$_SAIDu"" �¥~-~Tr =;;¢s>., iv; _m;g=-%%@%~q;ff** T..», ii s-s;;:s¢;s¢ss;,Hv~ 1/21 -us2sn~ ;§-@¢»-- rA&#39;~L * V� s&#39;�;4s -v.k . , 3 Q P = _ _ _ � , -,-. ., , 4 _._ -_.¢;.." . ~. _"__� .3. . 4.35-., 1: -.&#39;-&#39; .-�mm "13.-�Y -� -A "�-4&#39;?-";�§I" 11-�. 1&#39;.-. |- q --92 1 "r- I I 1-I",-7� j�? ""&#39;r&#39;2 �F H� "&#39;7 �-""" "7." P &#39;-Ix &#39;."�r-"?9*�:.--�- &#39; - -.. .-, .~ ~ H", -$1..-. ;t: .&#39; .-1 . - ;- .11? E ,� �- ; -"H-I 4» ~ -&#39; re -"N .&#39; &#39;; - -< - &#39; .�K " £7» .. I:&#39;>* &#39; .� �&#39;r-� "- .5 Q.� " - &#39;5 -� .6"-.-. -. - I� " &#39; � "&#39; "A � ! .: * ��K -2 &#39; Jr "in #1. � 1 � H V m " 1&#39; k H�

0rial], ,�

*- 4

&#39;1-»;�a� ray . _j&#39;.I.in-. , &#39;

5%» 1:

� .. �L92L¬ x;,¢:~5?i?§:@?J~.&#39;_&#39;~".-."_.a<_L a#iss~�§<�";-1L§..%i.�;2a¢.**_ »."e,;.3&i¢¢..¥@fwu4..=s»¥hwER4-s§.r¢s$I£..&#39; &#39;--I....=�5=s-&#39;

.&#39;. . -- #»&#39; u. fjv W _ _._,- .. &#39; P: F� , 5 - H5 3 JUL 3119;»? |¬__.§...;§7,--�

r

. J

,,_¢...,

.

. ,.-_,.

;¢:�.v-5&#39; .:1"

F

_. ..

X ..:5� - *

r&#39;

t9292

_.,- ,.-.

-v my.

e4

¢- .e-Y;

_,-_ ..� L», �-- 3 -~h-.q.||.A|r� &#39;4--� e .4 e _ *i� -�� ~~.-~*.~-ti-+¢-VA-We if ,;~ 1-~~ - _. _ - e ~ _.~* - .__:___..__._ ».

o-10 IR". 0-1-so!

!/

0 0 &#39;

-1" 0

To oNlc

�Q dmunW� Belmont if

Mohr

Pononn

RoanTummTrotter

cu-qIi92.192&#39;.v"&#39;-?�5.&#39;7-��$"" "l 4;�-*�? &#39; T"-�� &#39; �W. _~" �= &#39;5&#39;�. 455 j-" ~ Tole. Floom _._.._

!enner.fto Offer� titre�ate . .. . . . ..~- "&#39;°"

Curbmg Hlgh Courtiy;-.._-&#39; Senator Jenner, Republican.� prgcuoeg 0! agencleS in the ex-f

yesterday to strip t lwlth A sitiproval of Congress. F"

§.�ourt of the right to heal� ap- 40 deg with probleehs of gub-IEKTYM 055% invblving State in

&#39; niche Auéellm rt-ilI;1&#39; Rf 2; P1_u�-&#39;pu&#39;a.ee,� hlncttone hid. 1/6: Indiana. m§pd �WB§fgu�vQ� 4 branch "Elf-I-bulked. E 4 . ~ I h&#39; eme

4&#39;

or�Federa.I&#39;ohargea at s�bver-- - � I&#39;92 1 � } 92 &#39;4 &#39; 1�sion, or contempt ot Con1:resa.;&#39;m°&#39;1&#39;°- 7 5 1 " .-

_ "L will introduce 1egi.s&#39;lat.lon_ _ =�gnmeeilately to. remove the Su- ll ulatlons estaglished lg the lee-C m-g 13 1;; 5-� 55.. 1at,u1-95 9,11 execu ve �lien-92

,ol§$n 1:1 _t-lie �Em.-. lulu/�lm or the several Bt§w=+I=_d¢I-1peeve."-he me m a speech de- wlth nroblema of ~5ub?&#39;1"=1<m-ngmmm thg many within th�lf bO1&#39;dCl&#39;I. �L �&#39;7&#39; H3 - &#39; -n.r.~- ; �-.- 1 _- 4_Ru1 no pted byF"! be e we to wnelder �qbbatda toeidealawlth prob _m or�.. "5hqaeedlly,� l£aacldod.&#39;~&#39;

Senate: Jenner Bald 5115.11 W1 15. Rules ol� state cburts_andptep would �be &#39;const1tutldna.l. State b0at"d8�o&#39;l"baf �E1uir:£lnerl_92ii: quoted Article a o__I the Con- overnine me" gdmleeiqh ==z,¢1:- �AEgtution that� �the�-Supreme� �an; &#39; �wart shell� heie &#39; enP°11%t@3.l Senetiar -Je&#39;n_ner eeld l&#39;§,e.wesJurisdiction. both as to law and] prgposmg mg, 1eglslat1on_befact. with such exceDU°l&#39;1-&#39;1 9-�5&#39;eauee he believes the couit .under such rezulatlons no the��u.tn:lermlnlng e��ort.s of-l &#39;

oxmresa shill make."_&#39;I"he Indiana Senator said that the national and State levels .bé reads -these words. they _

ll oneress that lt haa �Il.1l1,inistplot." &#39;. ~ &#39; . -. ~unohallengeable power to pewlaws immediately which would!deprive the Supreme Court 01&#39;;appellate jurisdiction. both anto law and tact," in "cases Inth n 11-1 = -&#39; e.__.eee- _.e__e. _- 1

4 , �.1 1. Cases lhvolvlng purposes�;; &#39;,. Junctions, and practices or con-]* �gresslonal committees. lnolud-._.

ling punishments for contempt;

3. All laws and executive x&#39;¢I&#39;- &#39;

eubvepslon among teech~en;_.P.&#39; i

to�the practice oi law, .

lpeoplem ;-epresentatlvea at �bot ;meet and master "the Comm �

. 3 . -,1 I 1; I; 92

1.�

� l _ H |

mmtzzfZ ri" 1* _ » ~ _,,-.--P NOW LGGdU�T

..; _f I: I &#39; 92 .-_ I-,,--I-"&#39;-"&#39;-/

. /W l5!-JUL31357

1.4- 27.5/?5_;A

&#39;&&#39;5:r*nr:cono:9132 uul. 31_1952l. � _

&#39; 1

Wash. Post and ._i_

Tlmes Herold

�Wash. News

Wash. Star £11:N. Y. Herold

Tribune

N. Y. Journal-____i_

American

N. Y. Mirror

N. Y. Dolly News _.___

N. Y. Times

Dolly Worker ___..i._The Worker ..

5....

¥-is -. -In?��Iv

0-ll Rev. 9-1-in

ii .&#39; G Q

_ __ 0y�Ju3:¢iaI_Fam:Iy Rift� One of the more serious crit tisms &#39;3

.__~ 3,;

>.-gsiei,&#39; Tl-IR:

-.~;.-;-1Li &#39;|v".%&#39;i-. I- -- ¢- .:..-- -_.»-zs"_.-.� ._ .

..-=..

; n arer92I"&#39; in.=&#39;.e 1

|- 2

, E:. - Q-_ he

D;J .

. I 1

FY-1&#39; _��-1�ut ems?

92

if the upreme Court�: performtnce ll �Iiits-recent session has come from the�-�-&#39;chief justices iof the States-4|. group��xfhieh cen hardly be accused of partisan "or sectional carping. -_&#39; -nu�: �ft; lg";--- .=.T-5 Ivieetini in New �fork i, few diy*§&#39;.&#39;Ie , _tne_ .surg_e chief justices reqsed ;r_£21: concern over� the is-end o &#39;1mm decisions in matters bearing upon .the relations between the States and the &#39;

kdersi esteluishrnent. In ,,&#39;;ert!cu1=.r, ,5:the State Judicial officers were per-7-&#39;~tarbed by two 8uprem_e.. Court rulings�hich reversed the highest courts ofliew Mexico end California in cases in-volving the ehglhiiity of epp1l@l! to�ractice isw in those States. The ques-tion was reierredftot a. committee com-posed of the chief justices of Maine,-Massachusetts, Arizona, South Carolina,Jfuerto Rico, Ohio and Wisconsin. Thiscommittee, in turn, proposed that the ,conference state its ". . . profound con-cern for the retention andexercise ofthe constitutional powers of State gov- &#39;

pointment of e. special committee �tnearamlne the role of the Judiciary salt� ,_aifects the distribution of �powers he- &#39;tween the states and the Federal Gov- rernment . . ." Thirty-two of the 42 chiefjjisticee present imiorse� this proposal. if1 Criticism of this sortucomlng from.-dhief justices representing all sections-df the country, is not something to he-lirushed aside. For the highest judicial;of�cers oi the States would not indulgeflightly or capricious]! in criticism of the",highest judicial o�icere-of the Fedelil-lai.qstem. The report of this lpe�lllliiiittee, if it follows the line ofion at the nee Ymk �ieetini, ma? weir�qrercise a. su§sta.nt.is.l_restx;s,ir92ing 11_i�i13§

ce on the� tendency ofthe Supreme;$11 to Whittle doufn, in decision after ;�cision; the"&#39;_I>owers which. hi-df _"�. nnaht Q 395155 in �an 5951;. *"&#39;

&#39; �hi-with ii;-�.-. __,». "

ernments," and recommended the ap-

hie ._i..._..___.____,_i_ , _,___

.__ .~ Y

92

man

Belmont ,,.___....Mob!

Pdrlonl

RoseTommTrotter ._____Noose ._._...___._Tole. Room _..._Hoilomon _.___

G°�_

/01".:,»i£/

I

@_./7i _s

b�

92

6- 2 - _-?&#39;_2§._L&#39;"4?<&#39;51""-�-°°?,Ei&#39;§.°B8 {JUL 31 lfn�

�--I-__-_,_-.-g-III".

Wash. Post and

Times Herald

Wash. News

Wash. StorN. Y. Herold

Tribune

N. Y. Journal-________

American

N. Y. Mirror

N. Y. Dolly NewsN. Y. Times .._____..__

Daily Worker

The Worker

New Lender ___.____._

-_-.-___i,

_ ___-,-_,, __:e_h A... i, _ _V_ VA_,__,____ *_

un-.u

n92~~=&#39;iii�

I�C92!. e - &#39;5- ,-v

,--._-_. _. -� &#39;55.�.-1"?-� I�1,1 . ;

as-iimve-�-�~�z&#39;.-¥�- &#39;--..--.-,-;,5-<., ..*&#39;.__. "&#39;

3:2:-4 .{-514 &#39; kis-:*._&#39;:,.z

.a 92� 1

.--.--_-". P. - :1-1&#39;-_v92. &#39;-=-&#39;-1&#39;&#39;~_ .1�?

:9. LY� V �

.92r_� .=. -

�I fa�.-

-&#39;__�i-1 __ _.

_.T_&#39;�j_" -;-F.-."?.�_F&#39;;fee-~&#39;,&#39; >4»"r" .&#39;

z, --:&#39;_.&#39;1-�-92e ~ �r,

i.

»

o- in nu. 9-7-so! "

0 53

1,.

.-ta_-

I

929292

C�

i1 >

-1 ; . &#39; 7,. H � k_¢_,-.- . 1&#39;.-inc.-.&#39;.~-H»:-~1�=;92__m:-_--~ &#39;.- J .Reds e|n�7-{Bur America , or 927_..._,- ., _

5; eon, RUTH AL£_X_ANDi_Ei!In I was saying last Sundag,

our department of deiense a -vised our Senate subcommitteeon Internal Security, May 8,

I

&#39; 1

Di.

�tionf it could not meet thethat �undezr existing legisla-

complex security robiems-ariaing in the vital ageaa ot publicutilities and communicatlom,which are manned by employeeat private comsaniea, such asthe Western nion and theRadio Corporedou oi! lLrne!&#39;lco-,RcA_:___ ,__.j . Zr: .1., In case oi war or the immi-nenee oi! war, these �elds are anturai for espionage and sabo-�tage, and we should "tremble inour boots at what a lew per-sona "disposed" to committhese acts could do to us over-_night__ " _&#39;» _ .1 ".

On June 26. in response to theinformation trom our Deiense.-Department, this Senate aub-eomrnittee, �under Sen. Roman-»l-Lruskta and counsel judge Rob-Eert Morris, attempted to gues-htion - two emplo ea at CA,previously identllfed under oath;as Communists, and member: oithe American CommunicationsAasociationl, ACA, a trade

�union bar aiming a ént, whichg�wu kickeei out 0: cl.» czo :01--! alleged Communist leadership.

-in-naturnlorSenatoi&#39;la1po-llteneal, the committee got ctr�

la ��"&#39;��°?*::.%&#39;??Tf �I;-� 39?�? �*�°��F" "ii; The Supreme Cou� Aids 1�

.,.._-___--

o&#39;pe1-ation It ran straightinto. the road blocks set tag bythe_Supreme Court in its uni11 rulings. The witnesses dronedout the monotonous and im-pertinent reply �I decline to an-_swer� ior some 22 pages 0!testimony at taxpayers expense.And the Senate was powerlessto compel them to re�ly. Theywere advised by the hare:that they were completely th- &#39;in their consti utional right!when they invoked protectionat me first amendment, as tn-terpreted by the Supreme Court. »

Since thelpassage of the� &#39;Amendment in 1791, legalAmericana have interpret itas liberty under law, not anar-chy, and rarely "has it beenabuseil. But since the successful &#39;revolution in Russia in 1917, wehave witnessed the slow growthot a new kind oi citi2&#39;en�-dia-

loyal Americans. .._. ; Q;.- ~0_-._,_,-_.

� OUR GONGTIESS metthreat, which, had not &#39;3-afml-�teriaiized but remains "rean-atant potential in the back- "ground oi! our lives, by &#39;Passa.geoi the highly �pertinent Smith�Act, which declared that the-Qadvocacy oi such treason was�itself :�_g&#39;ixne. Nowalong comet _the �ii ai&#39; Supneme Court and,knock: the smith Act him

l I

U 5"�-"-M-Q :a:n-�sis-Q-.11�... :at._b-if �

�7{AAUG 1957

1

Q-

Nichols

/ ardman�@ Eflmont

iioh:

Parson: ...;_

HDIIII ii-iiTatum __i_

Trotter __.?...Neon ___._Tale. Room .........._

I-iolloman .i__

Gandy _...__...i

-92L

"&#39;*. .r -

_ »-»=/

not ncconoen141 AUG &#39;b 1957."

�

Wash. Post and

Times Herald

Wash. News

Wash. Star

N. Y. Herald

Tribune

N. Y. Journal-

American QN. Y. Mirror _i__N. Y. Daily News _...___.N. Y. Times &#39;

Daily Worker

The Worker

New Leader i_____&#39;__7.ii;7 I z ifi AV f

Date

if

4

~

P!--;_a.

u

51

1 "§�;=-e-N .fo"~§&#39;_____ 4-0JuL&#39;3&#39;11a1 1

--- __ == _-¢. - ,*�__-r -- -In-�" -_ ,___&#39;~;:-1ner�_ _7i&����- - -1 - � A4 Q" 4- ,� - _7__-_____ __- - __. . _, _, _ _,_

0- 10 mu. e-7-5;;

O 12!

J/

I

1

"&#39; -Z1. F�-!.AI: .�

|_|.en.ne� r onys 92..nLli&#39;.I;i

1;92id§ Red Coulis�

decisions 01 the men

have "utterly ahoeketfthis Ne-92

tion" because they "interfere.with the country�: internal se-Cllriiii. &#39; . &#39; . - &#39;|.

~ That, he said yesterday. is�why he hat introduced leglsls-,uon to strip the Court or theright to hear appeals or easesix1volvin¢_8tat.e or Federal�ehariei at i-ubversiori, er -:m=tempt oi Conn-ens. I - _ 1 -_ In a radio-TV interview on.NBC&#39;s Meet the Press, Senator}Jenner said he doesn&#39;t wanriaoj"curb or handicap the oourb.".r1-Igwevgr, he said, the high�court has zone "ra:np&#39;ent" and-�iluu "done more to help thegcommuniat cause in this Na»&#39;tion than anything that has

-hundred in the lest QUEER�[a�ceh_t u:y.&#39;_&#39; . . _ -_ . � - Jr

//1

Iii

Tolaon./92E§,l}?l_ , , Iuarumun

g~ &#39; �J Mob:Parlors: __._.._._

Roan ____.._

Team! _____=_Truth! ____._.._

Neaae _.._.._._.Tale. Room .___

Hollomcn ____._

Gondy __..__.._._

In�;/-/./

j/2&#39;= 14: me amerma n l - 3

Senator Jenipj Republican .o! Indiana, aayr�upreme 6onrt|&#39;~

Ii

- 1

re -r

92

1

Wash. Post and

Times Herald

Wash. News -4-,-_-iWash. Stu: __"_L?N. Y. Herald

Tribune

N. Y. Journal-._____..__

AmericanY. MirrorY. Daily News &#39;

N, Y. Times

Daily Worker

The Worker .__;__.

New Leader .._..__.__.._.

.-.~»;~~ &#39;*- - ~- &#39;.*1;~:�-----nnu~;T~�~ mitt" , i .*�~.:�*<" -&#39;" &#39; -iIt::*"" ..� .4 "Ir ,:~ 4-4�; ;:;- Wr - _ _

- 0- ll av. 9-7-sll U

1

a92

.-st!E .&#39;T f.- .1 2�

é l

~25�.

at "�~

£4» .945%�-_~ ,

.~ gr -T *

A- I

_ E.

..1 -Q1-1_v~_; � 1,4.&#39;;e92-In$»�l- pf-,51�.-"e.

r =~&#39; ..1,; -�L.� -1-¢&#39;- .-�..-_ u..-.,.-.__ .,, 4-.

Tgig : .._ &#39;_

j�.;.<;.&#39;.-

5;. &#39;

�J .

, - /92

/

premé Court Critics� |0*,-&#39; Msrylanfrtonner Governo l d. n iBynator, Herbert G&#39;Conor, is chair �n. a ,

man Am�R Gwm-1:mittee with a mouth-filling name-�thelCgmmittee on_._Cornmunist__Egg_t1.cs,.B es. This commit-1tee, with the approval oi the ABA mem-bers, if their applause is a trustworthyguide, now has joined the Chief Justicesof the States in criticismoi the line that

t rt has taken in someof its recent decisions. - - _ 1; 1 Q ,

4 _ &#39; This criticism has nothing to do withfsuch emotion.-charged. rulings as the�court&#39;s school desegregsiion decision.;Nor does it_ fall into the category ofintemperate name-calling. _It is, instead, expression ofgconcern by competentand responsible jnen who think thatthe court, in its zeal to safeguard �theo-retical individual rights,"_- may havemade it impossible for our Governmentto carry out "the �rst law of manmd�~|the right of, self-preservation� 9-T-;. What this comes down to, as we�understand it, is a clash of opinion withrespect to the gravity oi� the threatoi Communist subversion. In its-. origine.lSmith _Act decision t�ecourt held thatthe Communist cons iracy was a "clear,,and, present danger�: to our national,security. But with "changing times and-J58 ghange in judges, this position ap-.�pare-ntiy has been abandoned. As of to-Eiday, the court does not appear 1&#39;0 thinkthat communism poses much of a threatto this country, and�its_ recent decisionshgvegmade it dtl_!lcult_ __1!;no,t iqpossi�q_f the Department of-Justice and co 5�-

-ssional committees to pursue thw it of prosecution and exposure f

0

0&#39;

Tolson .._...._...._.._

Nichole e_..___.

Boordmon ___.

Belmont ..__.__.

Mohr

Parsons _._..___Boson ._.___.

Tomm _.__..

U Trotter izNoon _._____..

�" " Tele. Room _.__..

1 Y! Hollomon .____.92 - I 9292

-I--1-92 . ,_ ,.._._ ..- _._,_.-ee,I1 Mr. 0Conor�s committee and, toole er extent, the Chief,,Tustlees oi� t Q�;|B tes, dissent. They� say they �are J� .

anxious as .is__the Supreme Court _seregtzerd individual rights. But they{contend that this can be done , andshould be done without crippling thepower of ,the States and the legislativeand executive branches of the FederalGovernment to protect .t1&#39;1.e country_"against Communist in�ltration and-aggression." Z. - - , e _-I The debate on this point frequentlytenters on the Supreme Court&#39;s decisionin the {encks cgie, and we think it isivory much ta the point. In that rulingthe court majority held that a defendantIln a criminal case, under circufmstances�which were not"spe1ied out with su�i-&#39;latent clarity, was entitled to examinethe con§g&#39;§n§13,1 �jgs gj mg E51. This}�decision expressly disapproved the préki-"&#39;tree of permittigig the trial iudge to ex.amine the nles to ascertain what mate- �

tial was pertinent to the defendant�:92-$33 and letting him errarnine that-butnly that-material. p , �_ &#39;" ; &#39;

; For our part, are do not see why a iederai trial judge cannot hetrusted to�

- ake available _to a defendant all of�. e ooniidentim repormin a rile t-hat are"relevant to his defense and that "hotherefore is en�-titled to see. This wouldsafeguard the rights oi� an accused per-&#39;,fson andalso prevent �shing expeditionsthrough the confidential tiles," whitilrcould destroy the e�ectiyeness� oi.�rat; -.15 &#39;. " =-&#39;>*&#39;~:_&#39;»1.;-i&#39;:"&#39;_"I&#39;he Iencks ease is one of some 15&#39;�&#39;ul.ings whic_h_ha1{e evoked the eurrent[criticism of the court. This responsib�

ticisin, in our opinion, is a healFol. and we hope it will lead to &#39;co

�,9

�E! /�/�W/""".P I�

GIIRUE 1 I�?92

-

? goo"Wash. Post and ______

Times Herold

Wash. News

Wash. Std: EN. Y. Herold ..__._______

Tribune

N. Y. Journal-.%h._.

American

N. Y. Mirror ._.._...__.__..

N. Y. Duiiy News ._..__N. Y. Times

Daily Worker _..._____..__The Worker __.___..__..___

New Leader .__._..___._

Ddte I 7

1.C.

esse-

-e-&#39;:;:

-1; 7- :5;I L".92»�- A

!-_

W _

ir_&#39;;.Hi§-_|..-az-

1

�-_-elf�.- U

&#39; -5-&#39; . I "4-ir ----1.-t92 "�_.L&#39;_.-. _, ..

.i~&#39;j�.e_h �-f_-. 9�-"&#39;,. Y�I�? -.&#39;::,lA-t�i �-

1», . &#39;-_ ,

?&#39; I

J-_-..._.-_a_..

.._~e&#39; "*-&#39;- &#39;-&#39;-"I

¢/ j *&#39;

0"1|

52 OCT 15195

av

0 ¢.;az.m>&#39;I : Mars &#39;5 iormer. Governor, antiSenator, Herbert 0&#39;Conor, is chairman �or an American Bar Association ,Oom-mittee with a &#39;rnouth-ni1ing- name-�thcCommittee on. � Communist , Tactics,strategy and Objectives.� This commit-A

I tee, with the approval oi the ABA rnem-&#39;-. bers, it their applause is a trustworthy

guide, now has joined the Chief Justicesof the States in criticism of the line thatthe Supreme Court has taken in somewits recent decisions. &#39;- - _,,f-ii This criticism has nothing to do withSili�h emotion-charged. rulings as thecourt�s_ school desegregation decision.Nor does it fail into the category oi -intemperate name~cailhig. it is, irstesc, _ eipressionn of concern by competent &#39;and responsible� inch who think that *the court, in its zea�io safeguard �theo-Aretical individual rights,� may have &#39;made it inipossibieior our Governmentto carry out �the �rst law or mankind-~

the right of se1,1&#39;-preservation", -&#39; What this comes down to, as weuknclerstanid it, is a clash of opinioi�with 1,respect to the gravity oi� the threat 1:or Communist subversion. In its orieinai;Smith Act decision the court held that-

the Communist conspiracy was a "eiea1:-.�and present &#39;d.anger�_&#39; to our nationhfgecuritgi. .B_ut with changing times and�-; phenge Judge-_-_i, this position ep-�,patently has been abandoned. As oi to-Lday, the court does not appear to thinkthat communism poses much oi a threat.ito this country, and its recent decisilhs,§ha.ve"made it dif�cuit gr; not mipqimiq.Qtor the Department or Justice a Gone�?- committees� to pur their;

or}: oi� prosecution and e ;92/, _-:.9<t.@n_n1uni§t.a¢iiYi*L=e;et .- _..--V ~11

-- .i-- r92 »ll-&#39; r~ �

sstrr nmscros &#39;~ - 1-�A4,�0 � I

, J

=71

,0g,t_;. -I

*�n_-cs,� ~*~*~*1-- ,- :�*n-I ~�&#39; - 1-J --;- " &#39; "1, r r _ "&#39;"&#39;~-~:-- - -1

D"

I91.-2?�-74

tz

/- umm Z

roller __..___

an ___....___

T e. Room _._...._H01 man

Q

lo?"

- " -- z

F - 9 ?&#39;_5&#39;}�-? /4&#39;

NOT 125535020141 OCT 151957;

Wash. Post and ._..___Times Herold &#39;

Wash. NewsWash. Star _N. Y. Herold __._._._

Tribune

N. Y. Journal-.______

American

N. Y. Mirror U

N. Y. Daily News ._..._._..N. Y. Times __..____.

Boil? Worker ___._._..

The Worker

New Leader --_-----

Date

-1.

_ .

"w,, _

as

="<e:2.-1*-_ _ .

:§3.":&#39;l. I. &#39; -¢92..- ".-.-&#39;....-�-<._

-:I.~.Z.L;cu &#39; �

"ax

=&#39;.:_ � &#39; &#39;we--"~._

,_. ,-/

e;..=.&#39;- �$2�-� &#39; "

I-3:

i . i.�._&#39;-&#39; §&#39;¥¥;

�II1}�-j_&#39;

4¢ .-Eu i

_-1&1

J11§~.in

.�__r

-.-Q-.2...1&#39;.

" 92 i �.

rs

Bin a criminal case, under circumstance: I--gfwhich were not spelled out with mi!!-Lcient clarity, was entitled to examine éFthe con�dential �les of the FBI. This

.&#39;-_-y_. - &#39;ff -

- or bi �y���fé�i Y. ..,&#39;_» .�

i� r Vi_ __ ,r i_ _ -7 � --*ir**�;__�- re � 7� &#39; 7 " tr _ __

.4 &#39;

W� Mr 0&#39;c6�5E�E�é?>aii=unee&#39;vai1a,&#39;to 1.lesser x ent th ie as-qg-an �l�te-.tes,ed§sser;t. Frfé ire1&8 anxious as -isf the Supreme Court to;�safeguard individual rights.� Hut they?contend that this92 can be done and�.-should be done without crippling the�power or the Btgtes end the legislativeand executive brqnches of &#39;the Federa,l-"-Government to protect the country"against Communist in�ltration andaggression.� .e �» - -- -l P:W _e The debate� on thie point frequently -centers on the Supreme Court&#39;s decisionin the Jencks case, arid we think it is �very much .tb the �point. .In that ruling�the court majority held that a defendant

�decision expressly disapproved the pracé F�tice oi pennitting the trial -judge to ex-

&#39;ria.1 was pertinent to the defendant�:case and letting him examine that-�but &#39;only that--material. � &#39;, L

For our part, we do not see why a.~&#39;:FedereI triei-j1;1dg&#39;e&#39;ce.nziot be &#39;trusted ta ~~_make available] to a. defendant _e.1_l _oi[ &#39;Ythe con�dential reports in a file that are&#39;re1ev&#39;ant~ to his defense and that he -�T¥therefore is e�titled toisée. This wouldsafeguard the rlghtsoi� an accused &#39;ner&#39;-son and also prevent �shing expeditions

through the con�dential dies, which» &#39;

could destroy the e�ectiveness of the *1;rel. _. ;. i t -

The Jenctks case is one of some 15%rulings which hove evoked the current!criticism or the court. This responsible?

jerlticlsm, in our opinion, 1| I healthy!thing, end we hope it wi11_lea.d_to cork:rective action-ei_th_er by the court itself?�

1? &#39; &#39;- I?

92

,qz

_ .I92 .-.. - -..92|... _....-._ _ _. __ _ _._ - _u�iiuc the �ies w uaueriain what maie- �

L

7

_-. __ q

_!_ q, V� _V, _- _.---.1 Q »�-%==f-:Ie; :ii!I-""*a~>

I _- .-92 I-� 1" -i: . &#39;i4 - Iv av. 1- . q".:--.._&#39; r -I-..,.&#39;, Q»~~-~-= &#39;=- -I.»-. .. - lI. V" I ,.. V -3- .i_.I _ -~�_.;.__,~�.1;»:*»-&#39;;.&#39;§Q _._,,~.*=£:*�§3>~-�._r_,._,.-..,... I :_-_. Jo e-I we �92r ... - -. 92.Yr ,;,�__: &#39; 5 .1, e_ ,.1.

-92W

�";,=.$;.:._&#39;.;-1-. .J , .�,-....,&#39;.

. .31»--r-~ -_�92;.-- 92-

1 ;92

1&#39;-�-~.s _ ._&#39;.1.92.- "

J

1~ " ..

*&�,J&#39;1~?_&#39;!~" gw��é.-..,-3&#39;... A I�.,. I&#39;:.&#39;-.,&#39;1:§&>;;lI -�I.��-.~~4*L�"&#39;f�T4-»--3-"; ._ c. or". r=I.-&#39;92&#39; __�._:-we-:.>;P:I>=-a~_=u<.Iccf.~+~.- . w I --w.-"

�."J"T&#39;-." ""1"" &#39; �;�."T""&�-" ��&#39; "-"�_&#39;- &#39;. - &#39;�--�:,�- �...-- �£1 p- I?� II - &#39;If-.�o -___{92, Hf -_,-__ .-� -.- _- I -r-- _:-..,,¥- - - ....»-¢&#39; s-If -�ii� 1 e9}".y

my.�

v..

. &#39;.V� ."&#39;~.

1.. ,_&#39; I".

_92".T . &#39;5|.

"1. .-1* -

J�-""&#39;,_.

t &#39;.&#39;

i

»

. - -. ..-._ I1�-._¢ _. I� _-I�.

". _ &#39;1.. -.--

r~-l;.1;&#39;= . .1.

3- .- ._

.:.&.:: l I�_, .__ .,�I.� ,- 1 L- " I4 .

-�k Ix;

.=.&#39; -- ~-- we_-I s-.7; _-.1V_;�f!:- K�:.,.

-.,;._-_ - e-&#39; 1

-_ _ ll�.

1:1�-"&#39;I_ 9_j.s .;.,_"" &#39;-T.�.=,=t;.rs! 2-�?£T§}.�

-{ ~i&#39;92 k-- 1 1;-.&#39;. .3;.. --K .~,.i§ N ggic .19. .

92

7

92

.-Iv» 1�. IJ.1,

.�_

I1

;92&#39;2 _ . _

.�-I_4!-. -.., .92

*-

w

_|

�- i-sw92 . - .1,-

7. - en-. a _

" -4&#39;-Q �LJ ",:e&#39;:. __-I":-Y ~i

<-,--,.Ȣ

~.h.

92_.

1�:-

�~.

iI

1.-1.4- _;-1; .e-._:-&#39;l.&#39;.,.- ._.;<= pg: - "-&#39;1¢�.92.=»;g¢ -_ _- rry ,| _,=,-,1" ,f&#39;,:".-1&#39;-.&#39;-I; _ &#39; &#39; &#39; &#39; &7&#39;6 - - &#39;

. |_ I . �M.

�ii

-.-.�...".-&#39;-. s. .. �.1 -� .&#39; 1-I &#39;1�I~-~ I-=I§+;~ ~.- 1.-i»-~ .~ -1�-l__&#39; * .� W 1.,� i

.

": 1&#39;1

-.-e.. "3 . .. .-

Q 0&#39;."

""-1 e, _ - I&#39;.�§"92..li�- _ 1*�.§�-92.- &#39; "PL-&#39;_92j1&#39; _£, 10- -_-� ,&#39; 1;; !-Rt: �q �liq; N _:&#39;

_. 1. :.-- . &#39;~ .,.. . ., __ k. �.,. e. .|r -&#39;,&#39; "IT 92 .__»o Y-�r-Q T _-"-. 52:!� _&#39;I5&#39; 1 W.--r"&#39; ~"§.&#39;.¬=Y *;,£.1"�-&#39;

,1�.--. &#39;5 �.3 I - - -._;.__- "_ .13.-_-_;&#39;.» _-.. L.;1g:� --. _-§§�»~;=_-/;...-.. -.?.&#39;-=92. -:7; _--.1» <&#39; &#39; &#39; I I f .

J�

"c . .. .»~~.&#39;. &#39;l~�fr.:"" &#39;_" &#39;,..&#39;:-&#39;-"&#39;~ - - ..- . &#39; V"

1--&#39;» "F &#39; ls � &#39; I&#39;- .� fl� &#39; -W-&#39;=.§&#39;-...4592&#39; Zr�-1"--§&#39;--.&#39;~ .&#39;. &#39; �&#39; "� 1. ,8 _

-1" 11- -_?

- - .. . v" -&#39; . &#39;. .- s-M-»> vs". ,4 ,,&#39; - v,- .. .-.92 }:-_&#39;4- 1. -.

.."fr. ; -I1 -31 -¬92_ &#39; . &#39;,~--._. __ _ e _. _..._;.._2�. r

- I. I i.� � &#39;.- __&#39;=.&#39; > .__

&#39;92 - T l_&#39;L~�-1.�.-&#39;. &#39;i_~.&#39; - .3;-.: ..~ �-&#39;

-,_.=. . .4.- .-&#39;..-__ ..~ ...- ...~.~_. .-.-_.._.__,.J J. ,__ |__ .1.. &#39; -. .. -1- .: �-*-r; " | _&#39;92J~.__.. &#39; � I� �

� . -- .;> . 1- Q-,1»�- W.� i.

.,_e . .

&#39; ms� cL1P�|5i&#39; ~- 1;:-�@.�um! 7� -57. i-_?_ ?_. I�FRQH . /M :7.

&#39;iiIR*@§E . 1I"g.&#39;"&#39;."��:�-"J� &#39; �I! _ 1 &#39;0-92. &#39;. - =�_.., .__ ; .. . I ..

-I�-&#39;1�;-,&#39; �.. - j_ 1&#39; .. _�,1.--;_,-._ =.-»

.. .- .. 3..-.~.-._¢�-.__...»4 _~-.. 92 . a. ,. . _ �_92_ I�

_-I ,,1~.--..- -4 .., _ ,__ 1_ ., __ .». - 4», &#39;.&#39;92 -I�, 1&#39;, _.§./� ;�._ 1

I

NOT nzconozo.. 4 .4r s

|&#39;.&#39;- >1

- . » .1.I�&#39; � _

_ ._,141AUG lo I957 &#39;..&#39;4";Z-;T.<:..|.1."- .-»-.-.-. --..&#39;.,&#39;--�;- 3 �hie &#39;- -&#39;3. &#39; "":- "- "-.--- ,.*-...�?@-

_ 4.�! ;...._?:-i.:.- -.--;§::_4-4&#39;.� _._. - -"=~- - .&#39; Ff - -3- I .--o&#39; &#39; 4.9�.-.-=�.-�="§&#39;.1 1�;;- ..&#39;».- &#39;.�*~.~-- =1 I ?*

~ - e --,&#39; 4qr g _ �.5. .-7&#39; ,v~»v_�_, {:..:_,� - _§_ 1-.�."§&#39;§;> &#39;,.-1-F�. --_~,�__ -;.»*_-._,-;--- _.-.4

{J;arwm��%$$e ., - :1" - .1.�-f..a.;-�*-I -?.§_»Y_ . �-,2? Mir» > -- ; -.;-.,kl 1-... ,!.;:r_�.,&#39;-1-_,; .-._~ £_.h,_-3 :-var.! 92_v ,_if. .;_»»-3 ;-.;;§,§§1;*-�;...~*;,*i�§�I:I?�-*--.-:55-:Z&#39;% i~."_ I e� I &#39;� &#39; &#39;- I .&#39; - 1: &#39;."� I393 �92.-gf;i"&#39;i$§&#39;§17*-._,-1 .�;_>&#39;:�_ I�"A N; I, 6&#39;:&#39;er?5-.*.-�-.Tf&#39;~"�..-"~Iv�--�¢~"1} -l." i - ii: er-» - - -. 7555;.-ee=i&#39;c*:a.�*-.f%-Zcgif��r4� -1.�-E ,?,;J;� I&#39;- <"..¢-_.. -. _;--_ . .~.. = _. 92 -p_92,_ � _

f. j &#39;__ - L :~-- &#39; ..,--_i -�.2 � . -1�. ..-�*:jF,»,_¢$. . ,§_q_;_{�A FY r - - ., . Ic..&#39; rm , ;,. ..;, -

92�"..° 9.11�/. I1

1.--,"-1&#39; �re 15>� &#39; .. &#39;-yy ..-_ _ &#39; __ . 1

&#39; 1 .j-.-*=&#39; , --�e-. -1",__� 1: I-_-�I "15 ;;_�w&#39;?" E"-3.� ... . . V � . - <-

Wi. &#39;? .1 �.&#39;§v,*.~- . - - : -£"a-&#39;»=&#39;.1=3.&#39;-~�-&#39;~&#39;.�§§S� . 5 -- .;;:.- >

.1. I ¢- .q..,__F,_ .11.;-I _,-if __.l_;._� ._

._._ , .,._,,.._ . .-_.._..___ .»_.-_ .74 ..-. -.--:~_-r�-zr.-*4-14¢. e~&#39;i.°-,�;~- r -9-} -&#39;;��-

@;-.-&#39;¢7~¬k:é"�l,%1-.�_.i�i-

1&#39;. .-_&#39;92 <�>&#39;w<.";i"". F : � = "&#39;-§:~"-_.£1_-&#39; " �- .- .- -Q -&#39;= ,.,&#39;c. -1:». *

r

Is�

.; .<. *r;:=~= fiiiwl .�:&#39;~*;,,,,&#39; - . .....*-=1-.I==I.=»&#39;I=Iw II» . ..I i.;.�"§%= "=*¥£~14-r--vi:-13:. " 4" 9&#39;.� .-% ggr I&#39;M." ""�!l�-Q9. .°°.���, A3,�,-_ .. _ __. &#39; -- _ |.~: � v- -J. �Ly. ,..~..92__. F , �_&#39; lye};-:A"i: �. . _ __ - ,1? 92 3:� , _ _ A _ _ 9*!� _s, &#39; ..~r 1 �-3 .v�_� __-, 4,.� �Q, ,� E» ... �AH� : _ K f - ..

-�_ �.l>»&#39;i&#39;;f?;;§_Al __ _ _ " F ~._�,uu¢v:¢e=:- flllllrpbr� "-

-Fl� some P1059-"Y l!¢.1I&#39;}_0&#39; schoolll till �Nb HI. �ll.-ll-OI &#39;-&#39; _. l ._ I muchille-- . W 3"?! Mud while "In-umz-. in a as

stood �ons is soother _l_ns1.ber&#39; :&#39;,=?{=&#39;.-.�-_§=�-",",�-T" I�-F?-&#39;>;i.:?. =-The .princ|p_e1� ressozii 92?vhy&#39;fi._his

-I e question without 92-

ui_ci:__snswersreti_ese:,._l, &#39;i�heicwes92- - t_l.le�_equel�rig�hi:s bill o1_rel&#39; whichS�lll-�l1&#39;l_lI&#39;l contending ere rootedan judld� process, end theretori

esmeedin: d.tl_&#39;�eult inI!!! 17 tprvporthcrlns mn~lc92�Y=Il will understand.2.&#39;;&#39;ne American people hsvs beenconditioned to er. thgt _the

ttggugizigt�w. 1�-en .�scribes for itsell and cann

juricdiciioh ol

I 1 92 .

-./.&#39;*..&#39;T �_._V �

&#39; �._4"&#39;-_£~-

GK ds in whatever

duced mum; viemung

. "__.. J 1 - e .

.&#39;: n _ H - :1; 5 �I .5l.1tll§._§O§,, . Q 1,.-if 9292, 1&#39;? 4s 92. 1 �

Psrt Ill.; u me�.&#39;m-�nmséeu 1| doubttul whether £l:ere__ls gener-ill understanding �oi _t!u&#39; legal

. objections� that weresn lmbcrunt

. cause ot Hie rejection bt Part III �inithe equal rights bill. Though these92o_bJect1on_s were exhaustively statedQ the: Senate debate, end reportedst great length in .th_e press, _theyare lard going for the jsy chroni-cler _s.nd the lsyireoder. Part III

.gs.ve&#39;i.h_e Attorney General somer-Iityto invoke, in the na.me_&#39;o!&#39;i:heit-T�ll�_.Q£l sates for %sny_e1uzeu} thei judicial process of_ injuncizimi in rs-�eisl desegregation matter�; whether°.1"n.°.&#39;F *1� �ii-M?! �Weill �J�? W" Also it empowered liim to apply�for l_n{u.n_ci:ion �before the tect or vi-olation -on tile";-round-i.hs_t it srus92 "intended." And it Federal�courts the entwcemcnt snn or their 1njun_cuon&#39;s in these peas, ,

, _,_�!&#39;i1_ese_1e_gs.1innov§llosIs,a£tertlselr

historyI 1&#39;�l&#39;k°ml-m?! nil.

"_�.�-Fblown the mun -"*5 &#39;-

~stc_te_or mam ensigg of soI1.9II-i M4 .°9III~== l¢.&#39;==I>"i1ii> oo92mler_&#39;lonis recent declslms bylegisls as it powct -tos¢,.mii";> tbrldle the courifs ae-pellste jurisdiction, Bilt the move-ment does ll0t_"vlo�1l-i-I,� B10 busti-

tution, either inlsttsr or in spirit. sssome -who l;sve_crii.icize¢ ii; appen-

1flo,hl1h9i. ~.:&#39;-&#39;-f &#39;3"-.&#39;,&#39;-.�I&#39;»-"-;-C-;:&#39;_�| -;&#39; &#39; "�.Y~�$"�%§,_3}- ,, ,

~ , J�... .*92�. -. »- _, ,k v£Ir~m:<f1:=:u:svs¢Ic:¢. ,mt-4: .-&#39;I ,4: - - QQQI - ~=.

. .». uric =% &#39;�"i;:.sI:,;*r:;:-mm-e1 &#39;- i- .->~-~

&#39; ".&#39;-" -.- "�~ . _;,92s�..;~.- .- -.�ill II� "H-.&#39;L

l �iv1,- -. 1&#39; I-g� . r - 1

on - .- ». . K _-~.s.- , -I-W _,.

_ .m- .1 _--�; �kl."&#39;51," _|:

-"�-&#39;-"-. &#39; am....

&#39;edcuuser1 is� -fuels-. "

"II"!wlvinr contempt .ni.¢¢msre.n. "

>-

.-&#39;!�he�B_up1-eme �Court melt. since

-or congress to�slilu sreeoi&#39;lt_s}sppenu.u j1_u-lsdlctlon- rm authority#lll�speci1&#39;1csily" given in Section 2,

Lrt.i.eleIII_,otthethe .tnditions.l &#39;15:-oceduri jet the

urt wseto cxcrdse lb funciilonwheretctsnt�ongresshsdrred it. "l�|q_e precedent wss

�in Wiaoartn�aschy

sencs of G speci�c ststilus 1t&#39;1sc_ked}urisdictlon.. Even file dlssenter,Justice Wilson, who Ienerslly con-tended out the co11r_t�s lppellaf-8ares. derived from the Ccnytitu�on,ail therefore could be exercised

with s. specific sci: loil�fcll.agreed thst this exercise would be

invalid it Congress excluded thearea in which ii wss m.s&#39;de_..

whereti:e&#39;courthe1d&#39;thstini.hee.b- .

.s_

..&#39;._

P

-movImqnt~lg.&#39;Ql|- "."-1� =-§i�-&#39;:I.:-

-, -15,...-.= ~ . -.__--g_ -w,&#39;.:;="�~ &#39;:;.__¢. �k &#39;7;-v .&#39;- p 5-"1

4. -- p-Iv-1-,-as�,-_u.,I- -. _- -r .I I . ;&#39;-, ._ K �J! , .

.- .-.~

iiii- �..

4I11:

i i _.

W . .:

ifii�

,- .

I

� . .1

1."-?.I�§Ii.�-*-!-¢&#39;"*J --c .1 - " &#39;

slI!Ir

Q� 4

.0

L.»

,:�=�.:- m~a<= &#39;1--ca

-- 1&#39; -I=a1_...d�~>»92¢s?�-an .... .,,,

~E"

+.i 4. "T;&#39;! "&#39;1 3&#39; "&#39;1-&#39;~,&#39;-,� ""1="f.0&#39;:i?,"_-:92?{.&#39;i§&#39;. l

.~ Q &#39;92,"*� "%"iJ 1.» - . 0� :_";;l�sA&#39;»¥v&#39; 1,4-L 92i.{§":&#39;-r� 3:. &#39; J� �3

--..}:..,ga-at2 /.I92. : ...- - . . . . - .._. .- ;.I- &#39;_ .-7 --. 1--.__._ _ .. . _. ., _92., .r,_92- -. 1;�-T... -.-F - &#39; -w 92 iThe l&#39;reool�iesi,.a:-.,-..,..r.--.-;~;.. _ .. --. . -. .1!�->;__ . � . g.� &#39; _.; ,j_ L....4- - .&#39;

&#39;-. .. -1;1&#39;i"I7 has sccepied-the broad �f�~&#39; I " " _

. ..�_"l_- -_&#39;._&#39;...

.92.&#39;. - .....iv." &#39;1�-J .r_~.ei-fr�. -

l Q": *- &#39;13- _&#39; �xi;-.&#39;�..,._,_~�», ---1,4 .&#39;.."4=&#39;-Q� -_ I1 I -_I.&#39; .54�; -&#39;H �-ik 3:.

1- re�. 2-. �.-..21..--*..--:1 --

92"w~---it I-;~ 1.-~ Y�? L M-�I-L? I" ;&#39;, -._ .-&#39; 4&#39;,_>_1&#39; ;;. -.: ac; ...- .»

..- » 5 .� 1&#39;

h :&#39;1-» ,q."

�N _��__�};Ar___d ___ _ __ _-__F_ _ _ I.� ___t:;_,_V_ ,____. ,, _,v__&#39;_ __ __�,,__.___ W -- �_,;,:_��:~_,-�- _._.. . _. .,.

P� � &#39; _ Mr. mi,

. � 1 M I/&#39; � . Boardmg 3&#39;

mm ."_ _ Mr. Belmnn�Ml�. M-why _____M192 �X &#39;. PB":�1I&#39;|3i_r,;fL d / In The Nation I ,4 §Ij,§&#39;,�l, ij:

By Arthur Iircck M� °�""�"&#39;�&#39;

NY Times, July 30! �

a" .. . &#39;mM ?~1

-/*� &#39; /Q9 Senate 011 for a Neglected :31 ,t....*;�"..;11".iQ LBEP °1&#39; H1=�°°1&#39;Y §<°l"H�11"&#39;Ii;;;iii

U9� 9. 92 L!�

0 570 0Washington, July 29----The Senate debate over the pending equal

bill submitted by the Administration, and the discussion of Congressional

measures to counteract some recent Supreme Court decisions, have blown the

dust off chapters in American history that have been generally forgotten.

But how much the discussions have revived public interest and knowledge

of its country&#39;s foundations is another matter entirely. The principal

reasons why this must remain e question without a quick answer are these:

1! The issues in the equal fights bill over which Senators are contending

are rooted in judicial process, and thereforef are exceedingly difficult to

report in terms non-lawyers will understand.2! The Ameédcan people have beenconditioned to the belief that the jurisdiction of th extendse Supreme court

to whatever limits it prescribes for itself and cannot be reduced without

violating the Constitution.

fhe several indications that proposals to limit the jurisdiction of the5upreme court have a shock impact on the lay public reveal a broad un- I

familiarity with the Constitution. The vonstitution gave Congress the power

to control the court&#39;s jurisdiction, and there is a movement in �ongress to

assert it. Congress is more likely to counter some recent decisions by

legislation, than to abridge the court&#39;s appellate jurisdiction. But the .q

movement does not "violate? the constitution, eitherlagplet�erjpr in spirit,as smwm�aye cri zed it appear to believe, NOT ntconntnv Du la E5?�/~{ . 141 AUG 101957,

3

_--_-�-- -- - M», -��~x*A ~&#39; - - .�:¢~_-�- �� ,_ .-_...»;___ - -,.._ mm . . _ __

-~ u=n1n-v. 0-1-so! 0

L L11 if

%- ;.,:2:o,%�J I

J��lmont" Hob:

Parsons

RoanTomTrotter

NealeTale. Room

l-ioiiomun _.._._._an -

L}

, ;�é/§&#39;i&#39;;9&#39;{/&#39;}{./ a�uc/�[__o. uunay __i____

�i.-".

csuuu. ueoar ~ . » c -;_ * -I-.._., ___-_ _j_:__ - *____ , -

r- -.- ,- _ _____

. -

no Ann Jviee$B¢d<fir_§� By FU|.TQN_i.EW|5, JR, &#39; l |Id9qLl§!OI¥ __!f_!i&#39;_OOiI _th! &#39;_ �ground DI William J. BI&#39;¬l&#39;11&#39;lI.l1 Y.

H»-» -~~-i!.a."_-.e¢._&#39;-;;_&#39;.~_¢...a

of New Jersey, and Ike has his

_ reason for concern about the &#39;~"5�"&#39;- Tm� °1 M� hut �P�W Supreme Court than appears on P°|-"h&#39;�e�t&#39; ha� &#39;°"�&#39;°d °� him-

the surface, because the trend 0! with Fl&#39;ankmrt°i&#39;= H�£° mad� 5 . ,decisions 1.: not accidental. nu I114 Wiililm D°"81=# mad? ; ,"� F

- part of an established pattem on the 011191� ll��. he has pr0- �~_ " which can be ex cted to con-I �tinue-as demonsgreated by a l�e- " vmed mmseu m oppqsl�on &#39;

cent Washington dinner con-versation. - " &#39;- - - &#39;

The lady in questiori must; remain "anonymous, but she is

" the wife ct a top-drawer Presi-; den�al adviser. The affair was-» _ Iormal. Chic! Justice Earl War-� � ren was seated ather right, In>i ; voluble mood. he _1-emmlsced

&#39;_ g�bgut lilli� Sezavlltiiergn washingttoni � en e an = men IFS Wnr!&#39;en&#39;l n lntmenl: was, or .3 Farrived 11-om C�lifornia, he said, mm�, In 1.65:0 ng of . 1|. Ig they V-�EYE des�erat�ly l0r19ly- tlcal debt. He de�vered the 8:11- ~They found vijashlnswn a cold iornla delegn�on to Ike at the

13-09 Chicago Convention oi� 1952, andthus� clinched �Lire ElsejahowerI Ill-lll�l I-II-ll Illllllc, I-IIIIIZ

� President Eisenhower has more

court 1 � . .-

And then ll no relief &#39;in

sight. Franl-uiurter was talking

retirement several years _ ago, Qbut his health has picked upand the talk lino. more. Black,113 as chipper as when he was .appointed 20 yearn ago. Dou lat.has the constitution o! nngog.

&#39; Wash. Post and

Times Herald

Wash. News in

Wash. Star

N. Y. Herald

Tribune

V3� p , - 7 92._ ." As Chief Justice, he wasI f�niliar with his lab. It was = . c ti A -5

Q1! long time aince he had direct Bruwnell, as �oor Inger, had. contact with law practice, He. lgroed to let Wlrren name hip� was grop to get his feet on, DWI! .�I&#39;ho California_ the grounmif and desperate to Governor at comfortably hi his",. "Bfh]_gtQgm mm 111; Wm-lg, _ " Sacramento palace until tho" N Y J°umal_

1 One man. alone, befriended ;&#39;:°""¢i.0murred. then claimed �A &#39; 1-. &#39;�"�&#39;"-"land took him in, and umnaz c e »-.-: -- . 4 . MI qimman, he said, he {eels an undy¢ - _ Bill bi� 111%. time the Brennan. N_ Y. M130, |in: and unrepayabie gratitude. W���y @1119 110118. Br�wnell 3 _ __l_.. M: - N Y D 1 N. The lady listened as he bum should have learned. Warren - E , , /__, -f;,-ff - - 01 Y BW8 __.._.

Ne Y0 Time8

I-1Cthe t with dramatic rornan- .

ticishsihow they ma pm1oso- ge,&#39;°,"f,"�_�{�,�� J; 1£%gg?:11clli!>lg1igl:,.- ether, studied cases together. was mumrm t tr] as mug The WorkerI &#39;-%"°"°e§"&#39;d Mend: �m�"�h&#39;-mt� Warren was tit goo 1:1: to suit� . Y - c " � "New Leader &#39;

ch "max 1 , . . . _n .__ _. . _ .___ __ ___wash� mg 5 i Fad: _ Browne?! says now that hp _ N _

- was already demonstrating the .

i 1?hL"�"�� !°3e&#39;3�er&#39; %i"�Hz"°"! and Mr. Eisenhower almaciy_-&#39; 10:7 Daily work� ti-&#39;-

meetin of min _Fina.lly, he mm 1:, �_,___. Q �_.__�_ _______-__ __,__,_ ____... _ f f

l£m_.ht_n ..__._# K-&#39;_ &#39; ,>,;,.__v_"_; _ P161104 92_W1lill&#39;l:.J. Brennah_be-"Z._ p _,__ . .-_.%.. ;_,_4_,.�___.&#39;_ cause� he wanted _aF- � c--.1 .- &#39;_f&#39;-en-*&#39;~"»¢.¢~ - Catholic Democrat ti-om New

ldd U10 T811 .01 J . Thl !"l.!l-I01�! _ th

leeomv Ewe Bc>*-�§.&#39;1is@. .-33?1§.@�~o- ..~ 5&#39;? t.1-�R � /7�

53 AUG 9195.7 L�

i

tv.._ .._, . _», , ¬-»,..._....-92: ~- -&#39;

is � � r"~--vg ,3� -&#39;- n10-"..yr... &#39; &#39;

L; �sdf-X-"�* &#39; &#39;= t&#39; �Te

._--;.¢;§.__.l�2"!-r*� &#39;"�:&#39;�" . .,_A �Jr: 92-&#39;;&#39;-*�_-_&#39;h� _._--;, ef _ .1__-J;-. -�_&#39;-�4&#39; -.

-"" "&#39; :1: �"-- t~ __&#39; �1L

51: 1

�K.�-I-&#39; _-w�iW1$ .._-p -.._»_-_-.-... 45 "Pr.11}; -. -

2.�; __92 ._

4:7�-%&#39;

.7--=r:j-�- _. F-J-= �~,_=-t

:2. _1-_ _.

-11,.-�ct � _

¬��**._&#39;?":&#39;.__

1;-P7-&#39;.A! -e.4; _.� re.� - 4&#39;

"fa"-� -;.&#39;. ,

;.;;"�

-*~

"r-1&#39;

. ,_

Ft.

._7__ ._A _..92-...-|-- ,_� --

.___,...--n

5r

J&#39;92

..,..| -» -_-Hi _

&#39; Brennan�: name, and said

was highgl recommended byr the late let Justice Arthur1 Vanderbilt -of the New Jerseyr Supreme Court, one oi! the most- respected tigures ot the Amer-

lean bar. Q�-~.1-| . _&#39;

ACTUALLY, Vanderbilt hadreconunended Brennan not fora judgeship, but for a positionon Rogers� study commission

on sgeedeirr� up procedures

working, and helpful so tarthe study was concerned,-- As to Brennan&#39;s golitical and

social philosophy, e made no

statements would v ideha e nti-�ed him, implacably, for whathe turned out to be. They blue-

�printed the whole story.This explains the series&#39;ol

�-"modernist" decisions, wreck-ing the existing� structurecourt procedures; threateningthe effectiveness -of the FBI, im-

&#39; perillng every iniormant whoever contributed to��F&#39;BI �ies,and paralyzing the investigativeprocesses o1 the Congress.

Browneil frantically asks forlegislative corrections with one

house o,!tN I3nongress tied up in�libuste cl the other eagerto ggiome. Assistant FBI direc-

_tor uil Nichols is dispatchedto London to get the AmericanBar Assn. on helptul record.&#39; But cm mu trouble cannotbe undone; two p�ll��ll up-&#39; &#39; � &#39;PREs_polntmeutl. . �cenmm��g, r � ,, I For ll: &#39; t sh}. .&#39;r.____..- ,.;.-.§&#39;f_�-...._._.._____,,,,-"5"" &#39;"&#39; -!".,&#39;T-_","_&#39;_t -,t _, _- lg.�-¥.:L&#39;n�.4f%&#39;;

the ed courts on which� subject Brennan had made

-outstanding contribution in theNew Jersey courts. Rogerstound him personable, hard-

�&#39;�-~-- - ---- �». ---- -- ...._.._~.l_. I-. _.__--_ .. _._ ,e___, _ _

0 £2

Fe? T� uty Attorney deriéru � � &#39;V�lHun&#39;»&oger| came up with

he

� t

in

an

88

JU$T|QE WARRENinquiries. A simple reading&#39;nf_ Q� Too hr lett. &#39; � " �the man�! Past alke�hes and - -&#39;��"&#39; A 7&#39; "&#39; �M7-x�;

OI

@

54

F

F--

�. Es.&#39;_

P...� es

. .r-u-9

;_,_.� &#39;-&#39;3-�I T

-._.- ~f9q;,.:92. z�

*1 -F 1

Q: _- w

-1-?~_-.1; ~.-.7-_;._s_�-J, -H .,..

Le"----"3"--�Ia...__..,..__5921v4� -92re� &#39;1�_

rr _=,L1

11. IF

..._�;._.-, _.? ._&#39;,�_;._ »�..� �L .�&#39;.M-; ~:>: &#39;.- - -. _~.� .- rs_. _-._.-../.~

,;-..r~&#39;._|&#39;z-&#39;.-, -L;&#39;.--=_:&#39;_ ._ "��...r.�_.3&#39;_- -" 4 in� -_" ...-..�.-.-.&#39;1 .�_ 7. ,,,,_,_.,. .

5�: T&#39;.i- 3.

i

2:. =

.":

. ;_-in}.ga-

9"�

1-.

&#39;7?

_ _. .__.. --1� -� A_�_��-|�- �...-...�� .._�� ___..-_

3

92 £931-J. decisions have acted to tie the

? -_

e7~.7.- _ .7. &#39;~��~--� �&#39; ~ - *7� *1; " sf�; "1

0&#39;19 �ow. Q-1-SI!

//

. _ -�-_---- -- .77". &#39;7�| ,7�

Virtue Overdonetm eAT their London convention, Q11. Amer-

ican lawyers were given a reportfrom their special committee on the com-

munist problem. t T C7 "_ _

It charged that 15 recentl�ipygmg

overnment&#39;s hands in its efforts tostamp out communist subversion.

Cited, among others, were decisionswhich: &#39; " " s &#39;

O Op-en up confidential FBI files. &#39;

risks!" -. --ORestrict ability" to �re security�0Curb the investigating powers of

Congress. . e i _

0 Prohibit the states from enforcing.&#39; anti-sedition laws. - &#39; &#39;

I Prevent conviction for teaching over-throw of the Government by force. " i -s

The first law of mankind sa&#39; this" I ya&#39; committee, is the rig-ht of self-preserve»tion. It called for a �proper degree ofbalance between authority and liberty.

_ Here, of course, is the rub. What is aproper degree of balance? . &#39; ~- "

� A recent article by Capt. Stephen "E.Jones, USNR, is to the point,

Security measures, Capt. Jones wrotein the monthly magazine of the U. S.Naval Institute, are simply a s stem ofself-defense~�devices short oi, armedfoggia pi-otecting the country. -1 - i

O 0

"ring system that society developsfor its grrotection,� he wrote, �mow befraught with individual instances of in-convenience and even injustice. Theseare grounds for attempting to improveits operation-�not for throwing it out.The only 1-col question is: Arc these in-stances of injustice excessive, or theresult of bad fa&#39;£th?�_ &#39; _ i

Whatever &#39;the system,_ it must hegeared to the danger- That, it seems tous, is how you answer the questionof"Proper degree.� The communist threatis real and unrelenting. In thewords ofanother Supreme Court decision, it is a�clear and present danger." The theft ofour bomb secrets is among the morespectacular illustrations. . - .

We spend billions to deterhthe com-ismumsts from armed aggression. If wepermit them to accomplish their pur-poses by subversion, what good 13 ourmilitary defense�! _ &#39; - &#39;

&#39; *�l_�l_/�c are _essentiall� c peaceful andpeace-loving nation,� wrote C&#39;o.pt.Jones, �_�but ewe have little interest inbemg��or bccoming_�a corpse, howevervirtuous.� - .

He added that "One thing we can besure of: If the system of governmentthat stands for fair play in governmentIS uprooted and goes down, we have littleto hope for from the system that willtake its place." .

Tl�18t. We think, is the real �L15 oi the-issue�. . . . _ . y -

1.,-_92.&#39;5 I "92 nu�. _ -1�I -"

if/KW ri

,-

oll

W Bocrdmcnalmost -

Mob:

Parsons

RolenTcmunTrotter .?.._.

Noon _i-___Tole. Room _.�_._

Hollomcm ___....._.

U�,-&#39; Gandy -.-_.i�i

can

_. _ _ J, »� /&#39; /�I - .,- 1 ¢ -~ "-.. -.-� __.- 92_,I ii-iiiNOT nscoeorn

141 AUG 6]] I957,

Wash. Post and ii

Times Herold gWash. News _.A___Wash. Star _...____.__..

N. Y. Herold iiTribune �"

N. Y. Journal-_.___.___.

American

N. Y. Mirror ____i

N. Y. Dolly News _..__...__

N. Y. Times __.i___

Daily Worker .._....___._.

The Worker _.___...__._..

New Leader ._...__.._.....

7 . _ .92;*&#39;." .

1"�I&#39;."&#39; &#39;

__ ,__ _�-..-�~ I:-lg-&#39;1&#39;!�

._--- V�->~.. _, ,5-_g_1,.:-41$�

&#39;!�:_.;=;1=:;.&#39;¬T"-&#39;

*.�;-5&#39;.::/.-5 - &#39;*�:*;v ~

-"2�.".�" -&#39; ".2;-1.. - .

.1�, -.

-- i�1�&#39;F;"-1"&#39;&#39; .."" "c; P�

&#39;3;92-- ~ __._,

E� an-:9� ,¢_.F 92 :1

x

3:: -4,,� &#39;- 3.-&#39;" j-*-�|- " ~.*-�

1~.-e" .=".: ,-I

=.:_.--�¬;i-&#39;_&#39;_Q-.&#39;l-~_;5~_~

§_{:=;T;:<;L-

L&#39;.1..].&#39;_,__.-. _" �; ; ..

f

�B-

_ __ &#39;_ ___ __ ii __ _ _ _ _ ~7_A__ ~~-1.-r-- ___� -_;-_-.,� &#39;. "&#39;

% �Q

Ir. T0|l0Il....._,..Ir. Nichol:-__.__llr. B0nrdmu_Hr. Ielmont_..._.1 � &#39; Mr. lIohr_____,1

� lr.-Pnrsons.__...

_ M1�. TllnE?._|_

Ml�. T1&#39;01b9I_........__Mr. Nea.se._._..__

�Pele. l00nL_..__Mr. Holloman_......

Mill GI V gav &#39; &#39; "

§QW-92

I � &#39; -u" --

cf

_ &#39; --�

92

� 2,?�0

.92 . Aflj _�/

J _ BHIBAGU Ah-%ERiiIAN

I _%Editi0n-� :_..., ;.,-Qkg -_ "&#39;. &#39; ;� ,"*. �Q 1. _� � �count &#39;auuao:_ -- Date? * ad * 195. j �1531� ~ - ....;.- - 1 someonge reed t-,+* ~

"5:-�i +Oommuni:u aownn usul .J--;�thesth Ame dment I101 .wi�uholdthenn an»:--_ ;_ 7&#39; * ~

5.1% Q� .

up A l . INDEED - K§OTwn&#39;|::.c<�>|;.c>in &#39;1 -1~.¢&#39;*1.&#39;c l �g 141 9

&#39; faw 5/1�-_____ �"*>�&#39;2r �7? &#39; ,- .¢§&#39;i~J-¢&#39;~e�92 =.sn¢;¢.%..&#39;.9214�£ ":3" ~;§- &#39; _ A f _ __64[us 141957 %

92 n .

rr

o

%�i

~ is5

11&#39;*f&#39;:l_�V! .1._. _,__-.--¢;:¢a.-..-.¢-,_,.u-,r

�~91-?~&#39;-*�---"*� .

. . _ . .4rq-&#39;j_-Ls, .1"- v

.-:"=:~2-

...�..,» _,,_ile�"-<1�tr-92-t T,

,1 e

.�_�

.1:--: ar&#39;_

&#39; 5*--.i

�E: 7- N

Q : &#39;.92�._1: .&#39;Q.� " .. s5. . Q

~1-

.32�r

11

.... _-.._..._A__�_ _ ��;*~~ -- � ��&#39;~ _-92�|�&#39;-1 _|-��~, �:�~ - -&#39;A_�, _,__ ye, ___ ...__, ____...__ .7? ;:.~&#39;.._.._ -

*292

�&#39; . 1-»;

f.Ehfqr¢&#39;e§iiie�aVv&#39;F92SHLN&#39;�GTC&#39;IT�i&#39;,&#39; F�ii. i.--iii

�,?- It spokesman io_r_the &#39;na-�tion�s top 1aw.eni&#39;orcernent

ioiricera told Congress today�a highly organized numeri-cal minority in the .UnltedBtates is attempting to u

our police forces."Los Angeles Police Chie

William H. Parker, represent-ing the International Associa-tion oi� Police Chiefs, made hischarge in attacking a recentSupreme Court decision which-� a@ns to de-stroy modern law enforce-ment.� _ &#39;. ~_ Testifying before a House

judiciary subcommittee,Parker, said if organizedmoves �against the police�are successful, we will soonlose the ability to police cur-

�selvea and the result willbe that the people will notget the protection they de-

lserve.� 4&#39; - e. 1. .f

�=1.

"dermlne the eitectiveness lc-1%

&#39;0 :1!�

em. .. �"--&#39;1»

"States .�z=§i�K &#39; i T-oiice, &#39;-"�vv"asi".§i&#39;z1g¢ton, spo e against niilowin�the Supreme Court�: inter-pretation or the law .ln the"Mallory" decision to remainon the books. i

The court in that decisionive weeks ago voided the con-

fession or a convicted Wash-ington rapist, Andrew Mal-lory, on the grounds the policeheld him too long tor ques-tioning neiore erreigning hi:-mtMallory, who had been undera death sentence, went tree.

The subcommittee, iheadeby Rep. Willis Dernocra ,Louisiana, is studying the iiect of the decision and tneed tor legislation;-___.-.-.._ &#39; pr H ._

i .Mr. ToloollMr. Nichole..___Mr. BoardrnI.n..._

�yy92 Mr. BeimontV--.. Mr. Moll:-_..

Mr. Person ..Kr. Ro - .."&#39; Hr. &#39;1� £Mr. Tiut &#39;

Mr. Noose ..i_

Telo. Room_.__. 1Mr, Holiomo.n____ 1Min Gondy_.J.__ �

Q

I

L05� liiiF?i:iES E1-iCAiJiii~!ER

live 2 - 195&#39;:

41 _ Av _ .Q cg /70R.M/Md» CD/Tied

� Mvkkra�f //- /&#39;>�su?»rE»?

as A/I/6&#39;£A£5&#39; 734/ca C�/WE�

� " _ 4 ,"&#39;~ 1 , 1

- 3-1 92_/&#39;_ ___ _,,&#39;_-xi

NOT neooaozb141 AUG .9 1957

_|1-�--v�I"��

{,5

�t

t

_&#39;lZ-h��~, _ �:� _� M ,_ _. . _l~ A, ___~ _ ;._s�� -- :__ I-s�� ,--_ _-

�aw

I

in fr-"*K?:*.-:~ " -" -rm, �_il"."?�-31.�!

J1&#39;1dge,TE1�yesj 1Raps Rulings fOf High Court

J _|___ ,I:�__&#39;92l ,_-. . .1.� -.|.: ,.. �it1

not ~o,-tn. Foe; ;&#39; �In Banquet Speech "

. By Dick �mtt. -&#39;&#39; "&#39;.�!&#39; "P-"rt . ;

_ Middle District us; Judge John-son J. es of Wilkesboro tool:

"the U.S_. u reme rt to taskhere last nlg _ or s trulihg

jthat defendants in st case are en-Q titled to look into certain tiles. of�view enforcement" hgencies at-

tempting to convict them;x In a speech before the closing

banquet&#39;of _tbe North Carolina1? olic e Executitrea Association.Nudge Hayes "said. �ll I am evergconfronted with a case in which

the prosecution is required to bareits evidence at the detendant, Iwill dismiss the case."

He told the law enforcementleaders from across the state that"I am disturbed just as much asyou are� by certain recent rulingsoi the Supreme Court. t - "Lavr_en!ar-cement officers aremen charged with discovering . .&#39;,.who is violating the law" and�bringing them into court for trh1.iJudge Hayes said. "I do believe�that our highest court in the land-has recently rendered some deci-sions calculated to hamper the ol-ficers in performances of theirdutylu. .7 � I, __ &#39; 1

He_ said that "all of us shouldbe happy" that the Supreme Courtis trying to "pmtect our indiviqu-&#39;ai liberties" but "I10! If it ll in

1- O0� &#39;{�£92

�L

Ht-wraps�Open_Files;�. i "Decision jjT Continued from rage 1 o 1&#39;

He cited the nigh court�: rulingthat an officer who had informa-tion that mariiuana trade was lo"-ing on in a hotel, and who en-tered s room after smelling marl-juana fumes, could not testify ta.court because he eiitered the roomwithout a search warrant. 92- |_

"Judges should _rec&#39;ogn1ze,� �hesaid, �that we have officers whoare experts in certain fields justas doctors and laWYBrl_ 81&#39;!!!-pcrts in certain fields.� &#39;

In their efforts to "protect therighta_"t:|i the individual," he said.officers should be snowed to "naecommon sense.� . &#39; t

"I am a believer that the lawin its conception and wisest ad-ministration is the only hope ofAmerican liberty." he said.

The Supreme Court cannot beexpected to la sue opinions -to&#39;.&#39;pieaae all oi us," he said. be-cause it is made tip of "humanbEil!lE_l."_ &#39; �J _i_ :

He added that he did not believethat the court etger had "politicalmotivel�� �as charged by somecritics, in rendering decisions.

He charged the police delegatesto "set examples as lav; officersin the communities you are in.�As American citizens. he said "fitll 0511&#39; duty ia..u.ninis.tne nw&#39;:~

&#39; - -- -r&#39;7 : * t» &#39;

I&#39;M-

Mr. Ii. _r.e1&#39;__

Mr. Nnase __

Tole. Rot-.m_.Mr. H0lloman_

Miss Ga.ndy...._

92

. �°"*&#39;*%

7?

I1naton�Sa1em JourneWinston-Salem, N. C-

B-3-57Page 1

&#39; D�

" " /./_efdn_ng&#39;et&#39;_ the liberties of "all.";tr.., _� � "_.&#39;It la a "hazardous thhtifflhlsaid. to allow an lccusetl_Derao|_|or his lawyer to inspect "confiden-tial" ,tllea &#39; or law enforcement� p&#39;agencfiea. �An inherent danger_:t&#39;a,&#39;f;he&#39;sa|cl, "ll an offender � �

nd out who reported hint."-�2 _�-1 He silso took issue with snotSupreme Court decision -whichmade certain tactics of Kw�torcement officers -Vioiatioltl �-thelawof h else &#39;s an intro:

SENT DI�&#39; .

> 1-

._ . -1 .I&#39; 92 L;

EC OR.. rt &#39;

I�/:3_:¢NOT net; .141 AUG £2735}?

ii.63tv@1.ti;§? &#39;"*"-

�i._,_.____...,_-___, -� - -V � --_--_,_,.,..__..,___._. _. ___....,_,,__._,_,____.--._-._.... --o---gt-_.,f ._

_ "ii H __ _+ _ _ I .____:_,__,_ _ .i t 4-.�_ e_,___ t__

:

�>.- .

.-- -�gel,-,3; ;_

:-- 4.-2 � �V�; we-:_ -ct_ -__&#39;

" �- �

-_ n�-- _ .1..~ e

:E;5::-"_=�~_;£_&#39;.&#39;ii�. _q.&#39;�=&#39;--:_-�-rs

v�..=-5;.-»"

it &#39; �.&#39;-&#39;-�ii; &#39;.-*1;1�,-,. - �

~492.&#39;< - �-1--! we .-5-.5- :57-".~,

m.._,__.�F,;!..

I�n

. &#39;. - >-_<

J JR-� in"; ,-of.3 ,; V &#39;

._&#39;_§. .--�:2 L

5�.1-�-so &#39;

. »t

-z

7?

i

92i

�T.� -1- .&#39;"_ _ _ , ! &#39; - sf.!

�L 1/.f/�&#39;

1 §lt¢n"9r¢.§e$§&#39;i&#39;. :.:* W� &#39; &#39;;_�L!,:�._:L v &#39;i~�?1_+_,"" I

�r--~�� .--.-�"=&#39; *� -- �~-�*� .- Two We 0 -.»T;"-�PPfay cm1u_.o&#39;ma: MOULTON, gm m wfmm� 7 I!&#39;3 U�md P?!� 5"!!! Wm - snore, to thwart the co i1&#39; WASHINGTON. Joty §.- gm at immediate end &#39; 1 =1t ngr:-.5 ts about m undo; or &#39;0 pm e iew that doe: moi_;§I1em modiiy,� one or the pponite ol wlut the !�Supreme Court&#39;s"highly disput-_ lee. " - .; -_ - ¢led decisions of Inst month. The long� range but more}*-�This is the Jencks decision in- restic-method ii one Congress-which the court held that a an been historiéaiiy reluctant�

téetenoent most �Je given access 1 _empioy:- To enact legisla-ji�to reports made to the FBI by Fan �! limitiné the court&#39;g.inforrners who test1iy_ against urisdictton; or �1 ineeeaeing&#39;

�him in !eden__1 court, -&#39; - Q {or reducing its �membership. 1n What are the circumstances �t Congress took the �rst route

in which the Qongress can re~ ion the hot- political issue" ed e Supreme Court iieci- Tideinndg oii after the high";!i0n.?. &#39;- . _ - court in 194&#39;: mien um the?�

1 5&#39; Anti what is the legal beck-"United States-not the states--&#39;ground at the Jencks decision? owned the. valuable deposit;,_ &#39; In general. Cong;-es: can outside the low-water math �

lilimit or reverse Supreme Court": - In 1953 President Eisenhowefi�decisions however it _ ehooses eiene� a hiii stete|�so long es it stays within the oivnership oi! ell submergedIramgwork at the Cc-nstitution._1a.nd out to the three-mile limit.,_- On constitutionality, the htgh&#39;_>&#39;I&#39;he next you the court retuae�-court has the lest word and 0 ente92rta._1n e chnlien� to theI1-can reverse Congress. In Max» ew law on the_gro cl that

_ib=.u-v_,&#39; V. Madison," one of the ongress may do is it please;&#39;th_U.S. property-_, -iI Ooqrt Packing. &#39; _

most iamous ot all its opinion,-,Chiet J_ustiee John Marshal. es-tablished the principle that the -rt may review laws passed The �mm! muhod was �t

To W In lo &#39;*re:::t::,t";*;:";§:1<:.*::|.. .en the court was only 14

_ lln-OI 7., -ytn-= old. 1: marketi the a.».|.|.L&#39;§,§�l pon�i� Lgrhfg� �:_at p towards I. powerlul led-ilgz�bn to �dd � memhu.¢92�¥L¥.!9"911: !L!da-1&#39;-l;.92:_&#39;J-1:-i&#39;<&#39;l""�~I�i -J h incumbent who was 7 Q1:

:b5&#39;¢.¥&#39;: .7� 1.§i1P!�!91 *1?� m&#39;u~t

920�}

11:-92

1 .- I

qt?� e � �. i

. 7- _ �.k&#39;- . no. | -:¢re--"~�-&#39;»--- H le it-

9 "&#39;"9""tF¢l°�<"&#39;I*_ic&#39;$�.:?|;i�;,_

92&#39;*

I

Tale. Rooupi

Mr. HoiIoman¢..Mill Gendy...;_..

I�rott.er_._._._ l

.-9&#39;57�

lit/I-.r��_,[ _I

umrrma mom -1-1;H V 1.Hnn|r92 Yr� r _ - ---eE. I I l92I92-.--t..r-_.I.cLti�-L.iJ..i.!2LLL1J�$�l92&#39;1..&-�ll.

n4Tmn..._@..U_§.....5.l§§.?. .... .-ronwnnnnn BY N. Y. DiV1SIOH

15,2 NIGHT

RE! JENCKS DECISION

F�UFII.»E -

_92f92 .�9292

Y6

42 - /-�*"N O

141

X .1

�"-1"-re

&#39;1 -&#39;-1._, .r 1 --_

11..

¢s_:&#39;- __�_&#39;-:7la .51>." .:.-tA.

. . �

1&#39; "F

E�-an-_ &#39; �_. ,: ;_- =: &#39; 5

_.&#39;.�.E -I!�

L-:;&#39;;»&#39;:73 -.&#39;,=-K

-&#39;1W �.~ n;-&#39;.&#39;=,_

a:-»"[&#39; &#39;-" -&#39;__.,,_ ,rs":---»:&#39;

�::}*=.&#39;--.��}&#39;_:=.�~=r5"9-_�,-- . _,_ ,__..

:-

�gf

oi

�.

I

L.-_.-u.-__.

- -1&#39;". ,3

. I

i __jud§e. ;-.L- �» 1-~-Y

&#39; _ A

�iv-4" , o4!-�~"J~&#39; *_1Qan-0-.-�,4In-1n~ -1--� ti; t-~ i _

0

political defeat; &#39;._&#39;":1"-&#39;.-..rThem Appear!"-little likeli-_ _ that Gangrene will Initiatey Iv-teeptng limititlope on thesent court despite legisla-

ra&#39; lBdt&#39;i"�ita tenton passing a w

o modity,-tip Je_nc�I_:a decision.ten �Juno. 3

t when a toeee lummorledy&#39;_the.government in a crim-

_ pal trial has pre92_rlou�y madere rta&#39;about.the_caa_e to the

the -witneaa in uu�o &#39;�the Jenclts case spgt�cally

as an "erstwhile FBI under-»co92{er.a_gen_t!, then the defense�must beiiven access to thosereports to the FBI. The idea is

�that the defense then can cheatfwhether the Witnessdella "the�same Lstory in" court _that hetold in his previous reports. pY This seems like tordng oneside in 1 law case to supplyammunition to ,the.other aide.It is an extension oi old legal.Prlm=1Pl¢=e---1- . .. -1- The demand by-the defenseor such a s stems from a

the credibility or an opposition�&#39;witness;- and ifrom trial prac-�tices that_have developed ,overthe years in federal courts, _� 92_ - Justice la Duty. &#39;_ _� &#39;

One of thernain considers»tlons-r§oted_ in then court&#39;sopinion:-&#39;-is that the goyern-ment is not an ordinary liti-gant. The gov_ernment�s duty isnot just to �win cases but tosee that justice is done. I 3 &#39;.-t Justice William J. BrennanJ1-._ ruled in the Jencks casethat only detensetcounsel candecide whether he: purpose wlllff

served seeing reportgmagleto the FBI agents or informerswho are testi1ying&#39;.j - .Prior{ .Su-preme Court rulings had leilt.

is decision up� to the trial.

ttorney General Hverhe tine1:i Jr,,&#39; in urging legi a-til modify the Jencks

D�lnted out that ei�in principle" with w

ii t P per _�common law right -to attackl

i

wer_e"[reatly upiel, h ever,

�;1eeg;eJenclradecio �leto lI1&#39;|dl11ee._ _ &#39; court lnterpre &#39;_ _Igiving detense lawyers�:

_ as entl.re;.FBl �-�raw�!__ g-a caae."l�he .T_

�wet I1.==i..-.131.. _ rjlootger have �vIWI&#39;__...m~r=lrm thee. &#39;

to-&#39;--1&#39; -1. _,,

tn

iuchcontainhearnyand &#39;or|&#39;aawel1-aces

-f.��- ~

Would Restore llowerThe solution �urzed_o&#39;nr eon

gross by Mr Brcwnell-and ap-proved by Senate and l_-Ioucommittees-would restore totrial judges the power to decidefhich reports must be handed;ver to the detense and wouldut other Limits on: the Jen

decision. -- 5- »The proposed new law would�,

require disclosure only or those.of a_ witness� report to},

he FBI that relate to testtmoe had given against a deter?�t. The trial-Judge would ln3

pect the witness� report with-,held irom the defense. , . MIf the government balked at;rning over the portions held

by the judgeto be relevant�then the bill would empower thejudge to strike out the witness�te _

._ 1 ,.__.�

th

stimony or declare a,mls-trial.

Justice Brennan�: op n 1n_e Jencks case did not t on

a premise that any co titu-?tional right or the det dent�waslintrolvedrll the pr ed,bill la enacted, a new legal teatmight well rags; this point. J

£1.@f¢nd411I-&#39;-;.&#39; .=18hil- ._ 600!-ll&#39;1WI.3&#39;U�yln�l0�D|.&�

-

e."

l J... ._.__-_e..-1-» - *.=&#39;.&#39;?�

FI.=.- _ - ,"�_$&#39;�:i!&#39;~��-3�:�~.|:.-.7 r.., . _._ _.~ .:.

-.

. .- ,- y-�-Few.3&#39;-a-: ..-.- :_.� &#39;1-7- _:f&#39;,_"&#39;

.-.-Y1

Is�b

ii

.,. --5

ma

.&#39;-�I,H _., __H_

T; _;f_-,:.;.�-1-_..3=,92_g1;-_;=-_;;-_.=:�;..7@__ K

.-&#39;=-

i , ~

�a.

* �¢"�:"��":"""&#39;_ Wm � ""&#39; H " _&#39; 5": i&#39; err-?~~-&#39;4&#39;.

&#39;Ii.$.NetvsI92VoridRq|orl �*- - is

, .- .-sh . -L - _--- -- �

L;-..&#39;.&#39;, : ;= "-

i.i./-L !&#39;,

i __ � "&#39;1

U w|-in two éiiiiétiinv Aron"��___1_.___ ~ _ _ _;; ___ L -t_

A y * .1 Ill l_ &#39;COURT S I. NGS ON REDS

Views From _o&#39; Siote A�orney_§enorol and o Slbenciiior- i--. r s

New criticism of tho U.$. Supreme Courtls being trokorl in Congress and elsewhere.

Ono critic is Louis C. Wymon, oslornoy gon-orrsl of New ilnrnpsltlro and president of theNotional Association oi Attorneys Gerrard.

Mr. Wymon describes the effect oi recentCourt decisions on State lows. ��li tlld�fll

that the Constitution is being "tortured outcl oll rotiond historical proportion."

Another t&#39;.�l&#39;ilk ls Sostoior Willlult I. Jenner,

Republican, oi Inrliorto. Sortotor Jenner says .

that recent decisions wodtstt notional security,on "judge-mods low . . . subloel to no ro-vlovr."

by Louis C. Wyrnort

ii 11 _ .&#39; No mattjjie precise phrase, there is lithe Constitution�thst great irtstniment throcans have devised perhaps the most satisfcommunity living under a government oi law

men�is being tortured out cl� all rational historicalgoo by decision otter decision of the United States Sqreesrreuurt.&#39;I�hesedecirions,Intheircumuls|a&#39;veaspoct,seelrbyi1sto|&#39;

�ve appointed lustices to substitute a philosophy oi govern-ment patently contrary In that contemplated by George Walt-ington and the great ligures of our early oonstitutional period.Such Eat involves certain basic a-rsurnptioru concerning what hbest for the American way of life and, through these decisioru,in eiiect amends the Constitution .to the point of usurpi_._ngwhat has always heretofore been considered as the properfunction of the constitutional oonvention in our pattern iigovernment. �

Such decisions MILK! it-.1-the: wniound end mniu.-e ouryouth who seek and deserve real understanding of the truerelationship between state and individual, between Commu-nism and capitalism.

In reoent years, even months, this country has witnessedthe curious phenomenon of s Supreme Court decision onOne day and a bill in Congress to set lt aside an the next.Were such measures and developments peculiarly local inisolated cases they would be readily understandable, but pro-tests and outcry against these decisions have mounted fromNorth to South and from Elst to Well, loross the le�liltend breadth oi the United States. Most reoent is that groupof cases decided lune 11, 1957.

What was originally drawn as 1 compact betwom theStates to create a Federal Government with certain express

a one-way ticlret to a federal bureaucracy in whlcHon and authority of the individual States becomesless with every passing you.

powers which were deleiitd n the tr-m-"-t-eziiadrlituti0n�thi-eaten: by deeidon cl the l&#39;l.l$ué�0tIt to

No one questions that the powers expressly granted to the

III

&#39; Prosidorlt of the Iilotionol Islsoelotioniolil�ornoys Gonord

FederalCovg|nrnentinArtiolel,sectiort8,ar;:ower|bestcserdsotlbyiederslaut.h ritY§tl&#39;tbeoommm1g .l!utWlwt&#39;|tltosepowenareextendedhytheelerciseofsomesostcdcivil-liberties preoccupation or underdog complex intto thekind of decision that resulted in Grl�n o. Illinois or Pennsyl-mvtir o. Nehon; Sdmsrre 0. New Mexico; Kortigrbcrg o. Coli-pemh; Jendu II; Untied States; Wnihisu D. United Stator,-Sweeq o. New Hampshire, and Yates o. United Slates, weiaoe a oommonproblem oi tbebigitest magnitude. This prob-lemistheStaterinte1-estinitsownsurvival.

The public record oi Communist nibversion. both in thhoountry and in many other ouuntries around the world. isnotorious. it is equally notorious that responsible agencieswithin and without feds-sl and State governments have ro-peatedly oon�rmed that the Communist Party in this countais an arm of the Communist Party in the Soviet Union, withe objeodvo oi altmrtion oi the form of government oi the!J:~.ited St-=_Iee Q s ""_.........1&#39;~"92&#39;~92:m&#39;Jt etete�-.-.-hath: or not ti-..ro::¢

anlhterrnésdistestepolsodalhm-tobeattainedbyforoesndvio enoe necessary.ll our United Suites is to have any semblance of realistic

notional ser:urity�not usen�llly by guns or oven bombs buttbrou�s awareness oi possible subversion and nonforget�rhn1 Of tbe absolute enmlliotg to the principles cl freedom whichhas always character world Communissn�the bi�sest.

of the United States should not even hint that membe-|ntboCornmunlstPortyi.ssmeremattero!politiul

�Maud-ll m�ell>ljel.~et:l&#39; hglliuumhbeha liieriam =1� UmmlI su ve a to a voca od violence to overthrow tliepli-liovenunent oicylhis

tltst the Smith Act permits advocscy oi ford-overthromsbortolincitementofdirectectiontotbat

:5! mdwld the fupremgogourt of tho United sum hase steutssuasg morsloh eterlsooneerned,

membership in the Communist Perry ls aggarently considereds more matter oi political asrociatbn, privilgrod under theFirst Amendment. No mam: protestauons words in the

U.S-NIVIllWOI92lI$OI&#39;l&#39;.AoQ.f.l99

._7 7 1 __� - _ :;_ ; I..iI_&#39;_;_.?___. �&#39;---

_,4ab.!"

11%;

&#39;"��-"*� -r&#39;- -war-wt�? A"

" � -- . . ._, ... .1. T- i� K". -

. -.4." . . 4

_$Worirl§t

--_�r-- ����-asoe~�� .,.,,_E--..___ ,-,, .o-»nar92e:�.-- "zif *A. &#39;11�-�*-*&#39;** r "*-

0 . . Court hdslcoused "dongorous instability/ll�! our lewf�

"�.i �it-�"2"-�;.&#39;_-"" �J ; ."ti-t - .-£5.55

. ii:am In to inquire-attendance lecture at a State

munista and Cunmunist-hunt organisa-

tio:u,wbolisdwritter|thatvioimcetop|&#39;eservet!|eSovklSystem was iustiiledbutthat violence topreaervetlsecupitalijsystem was doubly damned-once for itself and once for itsp1ti,gsveHu!Ig% »

Tlrislatterdecisitastvasrestcdtattlteastonishirig ground,liixl-It. I-lilttherowasnoaasurancc thatale�slatuse whidi

delegated the investigation to an attorney gt.-m-mi want-edanswentotbequationsput; thatthlsloch of assurance evidenced an abuse ofauthority in the face oi� a legislative reso-l""§"* &#39;"!1&#39;92s- h

author-iii� if ag 2 rnFion_ u n such tion as in h£]udg- _ment may or rein ...*.&#39;

. I INo. matter the £:1�|&#39;asing of words nor .

the rationale of in ual members oi the .&#39;maturity; itLis plain �that -the elements of Iparinersnip net-vveen otite and iecierai inv-ernrnents in the investigation of subversiveactivities have been diarply limited, if notdestroyed. Mere questioning in legislativetact-�nding does not stigmatiu. It is thearuwers to questions that count. It� the ques-tions are pminent and relate to a vitalconcern oi the State, they should be sanetioned, not struck down. The mere askingof relevant questions in fact-�nding intopossible subversion cannot destroy legiti-mate free speech.

Without being tihrcspectful, I believe lt _is a fair comment to Cluthlotcrize the language oi the

E . i ___d, I sprals for-_the DeoartlrIrnt4I

ratio!!! E must be apparent to anyone n&#39;it| that the rcocnt decisions relating to Ctil�llurlisln

and the Communist Party; the tragic dt-lay in disposal ol theSubveriva Activities &#39;.ontml Board onlrrs rt&#39;lalil&#39;l| to theConumlsi Party registration under lhc lntrnul Senirlty Actoi I950; the requirerrumt that con�zlcntial tiles and report! tothe Federal Bureau ol Ins-estiigtion�which may include elli-silicd material-shall he open cute l1i.nu.-hr in cnrss-esami:-rmtinn in all criminal cases, tncludinl, Ipnssct-utinu for subversion:

�� rm� &#39;41 -

t

F

5�1

.92,&#39;I

�.- 2,-Ti " ,."*;.&#39;- I.� 4

&#39;3 T _" "�?!-.&#39;t§"¬"�:-"F �-+:#_. E 3- ,. "f_~&#39;!�

1%!

,a~ _.. ,, V _�_.

ll

A _._- _.iH__H &#39;1 � "&#39;.-_;_�&#39;m-&#39; ..

E ,§_-_P l--"=1--�q-7-�ff. M---_-"�&#39;�.=,,.;= *_..»-_, >-s:-t-..~aq;.¢-.___3;_e._t,--f: �:*:+:." ~.t.-. _ -___a_-__.w."-" -- �T-?¢�_�.t�-1.�-&#39;1"-�ill?

&#39;7: 7&#39;" "_ @-.. .. ,_=._,,d._.� _. ,_

Bt

*92

,l

-*"��""" _"-" 751&#39; ._ �.1. .M <&#39;»t~ehi"� ~:. - .§ e. if e e,

* iv� to &#39; =--. Q, - ..h.,,.-- ,1-.; =-.t- - . .r v �4 / _

ti.7S.N§svs_�!__92_VarldR¢paI&#39;t � &#39;~"&#39; 1- >9 i-�i &#39; �_� l -" 4~

. . . "Politics should he left out of iudielal decisions� . _

upreoisC-otlttiolthaliriteditalesliottld_ _tionolthg5tatlo|Cal.il&#39;orniadoInat

belhvethatanapplioantforadsnissiontothestatusofe�esroi the coutt�svvtIn to uphold tlions-who refuses to say thaCommunist Party st the time ofmoral character, the Supt-saneiimnid not tell the State of Califthere ll no Inaatlnalrle doubt atsimply bemuse l.he witness contendedcate or believe in force and violence Ihas examiners did not believe him.

ll a legislative committee investigating subversion ll! NOWHampshire questions a person who gave a required-attertiance lecture It I State-supported ultive�ity, aeekhl U0 ahaout whether directly or indirectly he advocated force andviolence to adolescent: cl tmpreoioneble nee the 5119&#39;!»Court should not tell the Slate legislature that it may not soinquire.

And �nally, under no clrel-Imlfln��-ll! ll" ¢l!l¢Bil°¢l 59"oi i.nter&#39;pre-tation oi the Smith Act;-the Supreme Court lllmllllnot permit exclusion from that Act advocacy and teadiing tiforcible overthrow oi� the Govemrnent as an abstract principkshort of incitement.

Effects cl Court�: RulingsWords may be combined like Ireys on a piano to play a

tune according to the conception oi� the pianist. Althoughthere is an old saying that �sticb and stones may huhmy bones but words can never hurt me," words from thehighest wort in the i-torld are t.=&#39;a.rslated his am�-�in allover the United States and in thoae places under UnitedSmiles iniluence�which includes a goodly portion of theWOI i

Such I play on words maltes in�nitely more di�euit illu-cial establishment of an intelligible dividin line betweenI-roe speech and advocacy oi subversion, and oilers encour-agement to those enemies of the !92rnerica.n way of life Who,like termites in the ioundati0n. are nevu seen and seldomheard until the lay the house lalll h.

This nation is composed ol many languages, many races,many creeda, living together under s document which penhitss good deal of give and take. The very iiesibiiity oi theFederal C�nltitutinn has insured its_ continued ltsengthagainst stresses and strains which, in other lands, have seen asmany as 17 governments la-ll in two years. This documentmust not continue to be interpreted in such s manner as to

thrmwoutoiltiltea-tiiegrutdividerbetwemthepowes-sotthe States and the Federal Government-�the Tenth Amad-ment.

We State attorneys general are responsible.national association, for asserting our heat edcourse ol history in the United States shall hea direction oi patemal federalism to one of enlighoperation between sovereign States and the Federalernment, each vvorlting in its own sphere with recognizeddivision of authority.

I believe that, if the United States Stinues with the type of decilion that hasoi late, that the National Association ofshould support at least four spocilc courses

First: The preparation cl language clarifying the TenthAmendment, to protect States� reserved powm in more cer-

l"ll , - -

iaiatqiaa-withitaiininedieterecouiuisedatiennealitestata

lqisiatts-as.lae_and:Tliata|ststhorIhadevhodsvhsrabythe$tatea

ahsilhavsageatasvuiceincoolsmatlusidsppointmentlto

tlI§IIp&#39;qneCotl1th_ann0I�IIt!s|&#39;ou�tlheUnited5tatsaSmili-ohenesihepstholtl1e|,rowttioiA.meries.

hgaltgestheoossrilnduims that poli�tllciadeciaiona, pe�onlvfllltotllin diould not he appointed to the

have been appropriateE to observe that �the

gers�ordtohavef-hisinaltinethdynamk:

of the fact thatdestroy iii-ell,

tollve

ptlt ti l &#39; lation ti |.h -a, ll t�llidei, ani,§.§°l&#39;.>ion in derogation ti State

FOllrth:Theappoin atthiseonferenceol;eds&#39;;;>.e|.&#39;ialco|nn1itteeoninternalsecr.trlty,insu-uctedtoim &#39;telymnfa with the interested federal agencies and with othernational groups, including the American Bar Association,

withsviewtopreparaizionoflegislationforintroductrionatthecurrentaesaiond bopeas,designeclmundoasp&#39;eatapor�ouclth�otocentdeehbmuipomhleshmtdconstitutional amendment.

Theebairunnotthilspecialcommitteeshoultlheiurtherirmnn-"""&#39;¬od m preani-�t the i:c�uTiittae&#39;i Entvm-~niei��idat.&#39;irn to

thepermanentexecotiveeornmitteeoithisasaociationmd,with its approval and authority, to appear before the Con-

sovereignty.

7�-�*ii

IF

In 1-� t

__ _&#39;i .

&#39;7 � 1,-H, . __ . Lr_ -;192%*92;.-Z- &#39;l_�____ .- -&#39; -

__ -___ _.--__-;;+-�»���¢�_ _;�,_q�_:______ . ___ _�_ _"_i___ Wt_ _____ ____ ___ __ W iii� _92 _� _ !� _k &#39; 7 77 __;I&#39;-�___ ���I�e .. 1,, 9- .� t

.- __ _ if - flJ,$.?�leweI92IferId Report " _ __ _� &#39; _

it -&#39; ,&#39; Wylnom There In "undermining of notional security" &#39;i." .. .. * &#39;- � &#39;-

Thuehneneedtetutme�ununciueluuytvingbvednnctoeetehltehlheeehete.

&.1._..¢��&#39;4:ai.i�h..

ekizenbyrr�rnerloortGenllememthe

decilkamllirikelAma&#39;||eeuWey.Itthoclnnoprincipellloyelhnerienne

Sgrrgrw Jennerfs Vievvre&#39; &#39;f¢,°URT !j!Ai_GljQ}l-ENQEP

Zr _end preeerve. It le tragic to an rut-h lndlrill ""d"&#39;"&#39;"°&#39;tn; d nllionnl eecurly and I.»-1»-..1_s=.r= qurrpre. n wrllas at the very {mar-tar�-rm d Em Arr�-er�-1�-i: r-.g!! &#39;-9 P"-"&#39;tect heel.

Foregbin� ore excerpts Irolll on oddren by Mr. Wy�l�llepruiderlt 0� the Notional Auoeiorion oi Attorney:erol, at the 51:9 notional conference oi lhd nrgunieolremSun Volley. lde., June 24, I957-

Aumgrtrrv or co|~|<;atss"92 f_ollowl_||g_le an excerpt on address by $lI!d_IIr

Sende, My 26, l957r .

There wu a time when the Supreme Court onnoehred ii:function to be the interpretation cl the law. For eorne timenow, the Supreme Court bar been makingl.ew�eubel.ituting its fudgrnent for the judg-ment of the legislative branch.

There wan a time when e lue�oe oi theSupreme Court rni�rt dissent in e cue cl

ErltIl!Ilpte!il0|1,butc0uldhere1ioduptI|to decide the neat use lnvotving lim�arpoint: in th the riot decisionti the Court, notwi�artandinghh own riordissent. This was because justice: oiptheSupreme Court respected the Churt andrespected the principle of ltarl decide.Nowadayl member: cf the Su-preme Court are constantly bury defend-ing thek own positions, and e justice who

�iuaminorityoiniononeparticularpoint an usually he expected to Itich tothat opinion whenever the point itflit-It�llr thus keeping the Court constantlylp .

By 1 proceee of attritionthe extreme liberal wing oi

lieconte 1 And wespectacle I Court oonetnn -

in; :1-If? lav�. and even ct-211$; ~ ----&#39;" ~ -don in an Apparent deterrninatiland whet the Court thinks it lb

Layman Ind lawyers, the legiala

92 Willie; E. Jenner hp!, of Indiana, on the floor of the

hate end iseuee oi the Blumhrtit trial hr-Id e year ago lustiiereit.

The jench mm, u you know. is our of 1 group ni wryrecall deci�oru wliitrh have gum� r92&#39;t&#39;n l&#39;.|rllu-r null f.u-tvtthan the Court ever has gone lx&#39;l0rt&#39; in llu: <li|t&#39;t1iu|| nl the lrit.

Thu: run he no tloullt that Ill� lutnl t&#39;H92-rt oi llwsr llt&#39;92.�i-lion! of thI&#39; Sr||m&#39;|m&#39; Cnuri lms In-en towellten Ill� Govt-rn|nt&#39;||l&#39;s rlln�s njuiinilCommlmiim anti sub921&#39;rsi92&#39;t1.

By |Q|&#39;|1¢&#39; ul tin-sit� tlvrmutls. atnli>u&#39;|192-t&#39;I&#39;-live law! and rt-g||latiu||.92 have hm-n rm-dered ineflt&#39;t&#39;ti92&#39; -. §l.|ti�5 l&#39;1;|92&#39;r l92t�f�lI rl�lirtlthe right to fight snlru-rsirm, -mtl lrnrrbeen denied thv right tu lmr Cnrmnruliuuffttrn EI&#39;It�tiCir1|l l:|9292-. 92&#39;inl.|l1|r! Ill fl1ll"I�:tlarrtisumvlrrsivt� lows l&#39;ut92,-1� lawn irrnwtl louseon aims!� trchlticalilit-s. Im|�tl|�||ti.|l �ll-92Of the Fill allltl 0| ullwf i|:92&#39;t"92lig.ali92&#39;t�Il11_a_ E w-ertlirctrmutrriirEight];-in-L l&#39;1._|92&#39;r_- ha-||opened u In "l&#39;l§hin t&#39;92 u~:liii<ms" hy dc-iezrdanta and their ommscl. The Courthas chal|t&#39;n|tI�d the aulhnrily of Cungrratto decide upon the :4-npé of ll! owninveitigatirmi i&#39;l.I&#39;l l the right nl at con-g&#39;l&#39;?isitmal r.&#39;0l&#39;nmitlr&#39;t&#39; In m.rh- up lli own

--� ~~ * J �,_n-a-Li W,

§I!&#39;

0-ll HIV I-1 Ill

3 AU Q57

_ 1? N 4!9, F"_|&#39;i.Seaébnét1 J.;.1.;¢_t";

....:, H W -. ;_/.7? the Sugreme Court rt *: &#39;

Trihme"Hm an

I W9!-

truth.I an a llylln but have ao-iied lkianinent to blgiant?!� m oi the Supreme

Cou:-t&#39;a neent deciaionl. Manyother: have misgivings parallelW W 9!�. W ¢~�=I �=i.ii:|eral" attitude at the Buweme

* Ebouid the leyin|. "Te theyietora belong the apoiia,� applyto the appointment afiudeelr

The original blame for recent. Bupreme Court �Ian� attaeheaFto the President and Senate.who bare nut these inexperi-

&#39;enood reformer: of lociety on

the eourt._ Wm beN 8the HQ?» wgio la not a ediudae with at ieaat ten yearn�experience on a atate auprmtebourt or United State Court o!

~~tt:r:r":ma:me wa . uaeto decide whether a Pi-eaidentiaiappointee to the Supreme Court

*:rm:zua�rIed. It bu not done: &#39; None of Ike�: appointee:"%.��..�i�..�.. 2�..�§�.3l�.�.&#39;?"..=.�Z�$

M5 intm t$&#39;.§.&#39;+"%....5?�°=.....&#39;§.� 3anlyone yeeronthebench.Bren-

�w �J;�.?°*?¬3 ..£?.&#39;1�....."��.".§on .only four yeara on the bench.Whittaker, ailparently a pretty

||ood man. Ial an unknown,| with about tliee yea:-|&#39; experi-"enei i the wueb. IiChar1ee Evan: Hughes�Fin Exception ._. Not me of the nine Illi aeaaoned iudae before b_Q1-Blt����l�i�. _ *

The tauil ll with Renae-relt. Truman. znatlaower andthe�.&#39;Benate Judiciary Com-Ilti .

* Oocaaienaliy a man likeCharla Evan: Hughea, who baaneva bad iudictai experienee.t1n&#39;na out O. I. But Hume:I&#39;a|alawyorlBy&#39;Iay,one oitbetun t&#39;I&#39;o"or three �in the UnitedItalea " -. -- &#39;

Iven I left-Iililer. named aaIlhited Btatel dlliziet 10486.generally acquires a teeiine ofl&#39;ell>iItlIb�.l&#39;lI I0 the Couititu-.,tlonatteryeanunttiebeneb.ButtonamamenwitbiiIioiudleiaitlperienea

___ _ ___ TA _

lur Suitema Court �it!-V&#39;I�h.atlhuuidbeieftinC�nlNQ

state leliliaturaa and thepeople. &#39;l�i:e0olItitur:imlyI:"_e.u lqialativr noeera hereinlflhted ah.a.1.l be vltad ll IOoneraq."-- . --.= Q1

Criticism of recent daeialmawen�: do much aood butewnei, unlel it ia directed at�the people who nominate uni

appoinilnenta tolbmnh. t , =- I � - .

I think tbeae iudeaa have antmenmeioue �luilt eumpiu.�They have acne an fat in ta-Iriting tin Cwe�tlrlim milaw: on bll queetima. like in-tenatlm, interstate comment.and mzerai veiiare, that theyaalve their oonaeienou by Inn-ing over blckllrd an "strictconatruetioni.rte" with respect tothe auppoaed rilhtl ol IitdiIi-i-

Suprenae CollrlAnd Free Enterprise

% the Euprema court. treeenternrile in a line thin; untilit beeomu aueoeaurui; then thecourt, mt Dunn-en, assumes theright to regulate its siI�bn de-

de whether a busineaa is torow. to stand rtiil. or to bwuma

amalier. But that ia devastatingto a "aovernment by law. and,not by men.� &#39;

The late eminent JustinBrandeis. of the Supreme Court,once laid: "Our government. tor

#4�

U1!BeimonMob:

PurlunlBonnTennTrotter _.i_NaoaaTole. Room _..._

107°

<W;&#39;1/"W P�

~I~:-_

&#39;1?!�

-;:- .. ¢.4�.-e; .."H-&#39; .-.-5-* � .92- �P251 &#39;.. ,.;_

N

K

J -&#39;1T:&#39;=&#39;"&#39;-I�

r-A - I-___ M.�-__-44. _

, ~

&#39;*&#39; -E ;»- -l=,.=w..~-en: =_&#39;- - --�

an-r 1q|�~~� e~e

¢

o-1| um. 0-may

Q

Ilrgeil IHigh Coliil aw

WHIl&#39;I&#39;!IBU1.F@�W. Va.. Alli. 10 UH.-&#39;!_&#39;he Vil-rliuia State Bar Aecocie.eeiied an Cum-enprevent the United Elia - &#39;same Court .

1 than ma &#39;en aiorlt! of ite rnberl areant. ~

A ruolution peeled at tnclosing bueineel eeeeiou oi

tion&#39;| 61th animalsaid -"lm1>ori.anl;the

I1-II� ,1*-"o WWIIIn .i mu amen at he mm�Court �ank be made with a"&#39;1&#39;u|i beqni.1.". the reeolutim�raid. It luneeted that ti:iudzee or the emu-el circuitcourt: oi appeal: be designedto at in rohtion to an an-,Merrie Cuurtvacanciu thatoc--our Iran time tqtiml. -_ I-4Fr Klvkemlall Elected &#39;-

J.dioe.1i Kuykendnil oi Win-chester earlier hed been unmi-_~�iuouel! elected president or the�

�vane. lucoeedlng mm 5.�Made oi Danvllle. David J.

.pi:er, vrae named pruidenip;;elect.anevr oiiiee. HeIi11be-Umme prelidentolthe neocla-IHIJIIIIJUIQIGI-1&#39;.� ._&#39;_L The convention intonightwitiranad�nal lesion by

-G-rucnther, preeidl�tmeriem�ed Omen. � &#39;.. An e result cf iolnt leech-jtlonl oi� the Virlinia Omen!

muembiyaddreeledtothe�tetebara:eocletion,t-iiealocieiiou

oiiicialb indoreed ee

J C!

One Proposal 1naarlui"�y_In that amenity I-houlcl IntFbe zrounh let divorce n �Vir-zinia, ao an eldd-HI: Itlttite�pr-ovk. Oi�! this Queetim. theueocieiimi memberehip il-nored a eommicte recommen-dation to the contrary.i Mao the association qrledthat it ahould he ielt 1-ID U�each individual court to decidewhether divorce eaeu shouldbe iundied by a In-ecial com»mieeioner. In addition the et-turneyl reieoted the idea oizivinz divorce courh the rizhtto divide the reel tats 0!per-eon: raking a divorce.- Aoommitwe recemmendationto the e�ect that court re-

portereehouidnotiaerequirdinailoourtlotreoordlritatewalrevened. Themem

ndeeided thatcourtanneopuaryinaii

Men. Richmond lawyer end.�Pu1itler Prlld-Ii�hlhl bhgra-=

.&#39;92

1/MToieonNicholeBoardBelmont iMohr qiPdrloul ii.Rolan _......iTo _...iTrottbt

J Neon iW &#39;r-1-. HoHollommn i._.._Gcndy mi

Q3�- 992 N01" RE5�f"�92°gmnua 1019

Q�I&#39;-&#39;-�---"�&#39;-&#39;-_-�

Wash. Post and i...__

:=-��" ,&#39; _._ Z2

�:92-1"�;-._

t1 - . . .-"-N--t-_-._.: -. n- .1!-

-�- --»_ D _ , _ _&#39;

- &#39; < - LAYI _ - T �£27?-l".

I92&#39;J"&#39;

W», ~; .2-�-:

aa 5-92p_�� ----~ -N ,_ _ _- Y� t _ . 92_ , "&#39;1,_ r.._i_ -.r "_; ____e _e____ l _. -. _ _ ______y�._ i� _&#39;__ _ __&#39;_ V7_ I &#39; _ " &#39; I ye &#39; J�-!_"!:.H

f i

Q t

_.V.7.:__�_

-iv: ___ __

P-EB+iiNiERSe+¢m=SEEN IN NIEN

°"iLl&#39;ii$thianion Notes ~

¢&#39;_

Across NationUnder Chief Justice {Mar

ren, the United States __$u_preme� c&#39;qu§_t�| d e c i sin n�have mi-ited the s e rio ucharge that its strictest construction of constitution!safeguards ll� reserved toCommunists &#39;and Cammunissympathizerl," Clar en cMinion declared la at nighHe spoke over W13-N Indcoast to coast Mutual netvfor

" In the senate ,and thruouthe country." Manion said"there s rising clamor oprotest aainst the gratuitouassertion of power by fedorajudges generally, and particulorly by the judges who nowcompose the Supreme court.

Holds Laws Noilliied� " The unwavering consis-tency with which the presentSupreme court has nuiii�edthe effectiveness oi federaland state laws against com-munist suhversion and e_n-couraged the hostility oi pro-communist witnesses heiorecongreseional tnvestigatin gcommittees �has subjected thecourt justices to I storm_n£ihitter crit.itti.l�iIi1 in Congresslnndout. ».t" &#39;.&#39;

cot power to review u calldecisiona in a variety of caaelwhere communist subversionisaniaaue.� -. .. ,1 *.-..

Manion then turned to theSupreme court&#39;s action in permitting Japan&#39;to try antows. IIL, soldier, "Willis:girard, in the death Japaneee . -, -.�.I�os�oes Unzerestlmatel�

�in iegni circles," he_nid.�there was a general extation that&#39;the Supsemcourt would lean over hackwards to give the soldier thesame meticulous constitutionnl co�verage&#39;that it pre-viously had extended to escore oi Communists who hadappealed to its judgment tromconvictions in state and ted-eral courts: But the lawyersM underestimated the"im~perioua isolation in whichthese lifetime, lad-word jus-tices not opcnte.

*� The eight justices Ihn re-mained in Wlohlngton to hearthe Girard cue brushed offit tm nsti &#39; naia portpnt co tutioiesues&#39;ln a hasty, unsigned,hut unanimous decision: whicheffectively turned the civilrights of I million Americanservice men over to the ten~der mercies od Ir. Dulles�state department. _ � -"in th:5Gi1-ard cue. the

Supreme urt,e£tecttveiy de-cided that foreign servicemen .a.re m a d e second-classcitizens and that they do losetheir �constitutional jlghtswhen they are not to foreigncountries, but the decision�falls to eaphin why this hashappened and ll deiihera _

.. misleading in its citation5� �mum M3 1"� nuthority {or out imera-a...ine;e sum-éma&#39;cquit_�m . - .- ,7-2Z5"c=dAom.Iucwrrtvri==_".eIe|1__�!f�°�:m.~n<¢i=>;e,..J K" &#39; |éc>?necon£&#39;F&#39;

I

*0

vI

in

L.3l9m_____ onus 1 2 1951*

Page__ eé� . ;Pari.e,ZZI

/�U

J1/9&#39;

~,i_~@r-9292i " e &#39;_ - 1414411; 19195] 1&#39;- ..rl

31» - , -�-�--,-=923V

g �liuoiioioéz L n &#39; i �__._____-_. _ a.&#39;,�_ �ALA-_ _ -.5 _-_-L . __&#39; __

0-10 um |-1-m

_. -7-:é-�.�:_ �:92> 92-. _.i�-&#39;1 _&#39; .&#39; 7:"5.&#39;f&#39; 1&#39;..*w�- � � _»- _J.%.___-._*3 .-- _..-_><.;&#39;-1� - .-1�A �=1&#39; . , . , .. ,.; ¬F.&#39;_ Ml M -"tJ&#39; -a H!� � " -5;�; "&#39;- Q &#39;- &#39;~£"�7� &#39;1-Tu 1-~92. . �I l &#39; .&#39; I� 5 .;&:.-H_-Q-�ii�, _92 F ,_ J .1 .- � 2 92k &#39;..I 0 I� w

W » 81%}F �Q ~.- � 1: | �.�. . "~92=.r. I5

63 AuG1e1s5&#39;r

-�Q -.-.&#39;|.. _!l"~

BUT WHOSE DEFENSE?_ nu.. 1, Iv.

_ &#39; "iii: -_ 7&#39; _ &#39; �� __ ..

U 4_ O_� &#39; Tell

»<"<&�;b J- -!!BEMs.s°H6 0&#39; 1-» 1; - e e- ~=5 3&#39;---�J .&#39; b �

�&Q:;,.&#39; __. I-{CF-�;&#39;_;._-;£___._--=;._. � - I &#39;

I .P,=}_:-1, _--.;�?j:.�,&#39;,,%;�ii.g: _

-�.�é-wa " *"

�~*§=� 5� ~-r�y.-.; &#39;_ _ _|;_...�.&#39;,:-ti. .» =�.&#39;f3:-§�=13�-.*>&#39;.=.&#39;i-%&#39;-&#39; � &#39; .7&#39; _ j

-2.;-_+.~= .=--...~�.~,&#39;- �&#39;�-15�-* T-=,K&#39;i�:.1»~?E"-� 5fg-. 1&#39; &#39; 7" -

" &#39;-"&*==.*2"::§r�T..3-: -&#39; ;§":":§ 11&#39; Tl 92 . &#39;.:{:&#39; é�:§:}�14"-5.--1&#39;? C -� _-, ~.&#39;<_"j_".». 5 J� -A ..;. Akezi *Q;-;§3s&#39;;._. . - _. &#39;?.l�=>.~-;5 __

II

J� Q

�v-&#39;1&#39; .- ,.-,..; --,&#39;_ .. :7 . �i _-§;&#39;;_,.{&#39;lI.&#39;¬.9=v1.-�_.-f . ,?-,� . 3 » ;.&#39; -.1. . .1�-&#39;1 --&#39;.- L I-.&#39;:¢ .».!-Jbgn - - "__l __ ._V_-~�1 : .

1- I _ -�

____"i

s�_ -_

� Q

&#39; .9_: �.-

.

�&#39;4xfiE &#39;-

� I

.-

�i-

@ /9/57�O l

Moll: _.i..iPsnune _i.._..Roles iui...Tums: iiTrottc: ._..._......._...Neale

&#39;_ Tull. Room -_...Hollemm .-__...._

W4� Gmay_._._

Ell!

aw

2 .- .-,1 75 ifJ�4-|%nE$@D§5

141 AUG 19 1957.

�

Wash. Post and -____&#39;Times Herald

Wash. News _._.__Wash. Star _-_i__N. Y. Herald -_.____

TribuneN. Y. Journal-

AmericanN. Y. Min-orN. Y. Dally NewsN. Y. TimesDaily WorkerThe WorkerNew Leader

Date

- * &#39; ,|-__|r&#39;"&#39; ,__v V ���&#39;� " "_�" "&#39;-

iuI___F�_muF0I1nwmd� _r_______N_mmuJ WDTWH h� LEV� Y vhvhyhw�UL A % MVQ� m_lmm_1__H ___m_Me t, n_ b _ N NNNDTNW u h_ 3 M 1_�_ué ______ V "__ _ _mtummmmmwmwmummm�¢wm%m%W[ Wmmmm�wmmmmwmmmumm mmmm� _ may Em MMmmWMmm__fmm Wu�mmmwmwm mm �M HmhmkhWw�%�@W_wmw$mmm%mWmmWmwwmmWmmmW __ / +§_ % _ 4f _.m mmmmmmmr /JWM _0 Q ___:_um.�_M__M HIP2_ BMP NTHG ____ I_ ,H%_ MM _ W_ %H i Gm�. d �_�___%_I" IH O �IV VII _�____ émnmgmB mm %_m _ OL IW OmM4DTMN.mm �g % hm M E mmWm�V_�m%W Wm�? hm gm� ma W_ R %Mb 1 J_ 1 _ __ , h A t Q UF%$m�wmm V J��� m£MWm$m%mf M� NM Wm _hZmh_ 2 m%mWhW_ _m_m%mM wU_%h%m _ M�- F W M f __ _ 7 M h_ M __ __ _?W h_HM�m __u_ m%H%%M&#39;WMhMmWwwW_%mmmmM_Iw~ MI 1f _=mi MW�0 gmmmmmmm h�wm_m3� W_wM%HmuMFWWmmWmm%m WM_ F5a __Au E nWEmmmnm��m_m_Mwwmmmv IIIIJ� &#39; __ W W_&#39;_ _;mmmMmwm;m._ mm �Wm M �mm Wmmmmhmm W mi an Mwn�yi WWWMWMWMWWMWMMMMWWMWWMMW�MmMMWMMMWWMWNMWMWMMmWM%mmMMhMW_�W%MMWWWmWL H M�w?h»h__N%__mim M: Mu; R _ O V Igm� lg _m M mm WWW mm} L� �aim Wummwmmgm mman� hm J _;_l ___, M nmmmmmm�mmmm mmLmM_MmM�&#39; Wm Wmhmmm WwmWmmmmmm_WMm�W%wM ma "__~____ M 92m _ _ l__ W _ I W h m_mMwmM%�mMMwmm __Wk_WgW_h_£ MM� hm� hf _ZF�m§mm�WE�$§%%h%%�W§%W�%%_hu »_l,��n-|i&#39; if _ _�r___ __~__ __qt_!|�w{_92__ kw!� N m 3_ _ I� > _ r_&#39;_| II� $�hii______::_r_=__ 4 92 __ �___5 ;T� _� _ __ ~�W _____�_ _ __ � Y _ __ _ _ ___ W__w_ __ �_ .S,_ � �t __ Q _ if __:__, uh, _"_ _ J_____ > >92� _ Z _ /_V_u_f�¬�:__ _&#39; � ____&#39;W__W__,_m_ _ > _ H? _|z%1 ___ i _ _ _ _UL," I �_ _______ __;_ __ _,_W a__ _=

e"� ,,,,;1�� "1 _ n in _ - ___

~&#39; .i.,..,@,.;,,_?,i. @,,..,.-.~_ 1/-

&#39;. 1927_TEiiTFfE"GR ��»&#39;»-"�~<�- I.*-f-&#39;1&#39;-*1-&#39;-** »&#39;~_ ��"�_�-" &#39;. &#39; ~-�ii�. __ __,_ :14-EE£_."J _ q__ , , G ileflrelyeu-&#39; .,3?" .* A w . ,~? &#39;- - T�-1�. �.1 &#39; �ij£?@P�uchle;ill" HI . �w DIE,�e 1211 lourt e ns -it.?.�..f&#39;_.&#39;1.&#39;*&#39;£&#39;l!..*1!":11"*=*l.*&#39; ~11-

�, �""�O"&#39; ~ "" &#39;� &#39; - " 1-&#39;* I �"- ,-T ; " * ~ I """"I=w=1I Iwut i�tifranod Q ie.....___.&#39;4n_|e -W 4 &#39;

�.�92&#39;- 7 ___ __ .

5» &#39;:wir-1 boots it_at one gm to- malie defense, &#39; . " And at another to. let in the-

My!� . _ _92;,.. ;__&#39;1-1-9�_

i -&#39; &#39;1: 1- "192-&#39; " - What b00tl it to deiend the South

""5 -�._ against the dim niienaee iot"&#39;landlDt&#39;|&#39;I1lV&#39;_li forcs� in� ?a1;t" TtireeL_;i-&#39;_ oi the Civii Rights hill and It ll-

�¥j£mer {ate-Part Four-to let &#39;in_"&#39;a__ army federal agents,

""� *P°ii§=m¢=- M .819nerve:-ll� .. �,- &#39; &#39; &#39;

Praising theithout

HI how~" damiie it 1&#39;01� us@511.�-&#39; Waite?

m a n n rein-ices�it vestsW exective le-

to in-veoe i

- e 1 e c-to go

� e ie d e r acourts tor

-&#39;- * ii injunctions 1 GRAVE! _&#39;l-1777&#39; "which, -without hint trial. meal

- imposed on those who violate the injunction. Why this should . bl4 called} week bill is more than I

can understand. For the procedureunder civil contempt, which does

notrequirea1urytrial,ieive|�y�Q4; grg-.et!&#39;pov1et._"H __-Q-J,t_*~-. L. E.

_m ., * */_ � , 3., .

Oohunnist Beseomlr ioa @311 ethinks the em may it worse

&#39; -_the South. more discord si� Iii;-�*2-., %=£ the 8-.&#39;:§::&#39;et:&#39;..e

uereq in the Depu-unustice with powe? to

; te election laws. procedures é:"edm1nistretlve&#39;reiiei, and In�name BI the Attorney General,brin3 coercive legislation elelnet

that impri-ltonment oi �nes em be"

� hooi decision: "It eete&#39;b,p&#39;_a_

.i _

_ Southerners pus juqm¢_e Hws FBI Huntetricted to mm; mun." It may�roam the universe �.&#39;. L .{&#39;_i &#39;1

. we-_* i--"*-&#39;-J No wonder the NAACP�! Roy

Wilkins is urging passage. As he- well-says. it "provides the federal

government tviiii the_instrumen_ta|with which to enioree the ijixht to

vote . , . and promises wider im-92piementiiti0n."_ Wide. is no wo�diorthe tederel 0lI8W!e]Iii?II the South

.which the hill _l_I stands will_ i&#39;n�ake&#39; possible and �hich� th e

NAACP will insist on with alllite.balance pi powei-."._ _ ;. @-

* it e-"Have we defeated a&#39;phaarmy only to be beatenipy

tlesh_andblood?..�l_. - 1Q-&#39;-p� * -;

�rm greater criticism or tho�President about the bill is that hseems not the least alerted doagainst its original oi-_ rema &#39;pitta-ll even- though he -_lla8,I|

�beneii�t;i {�e anaiys� anti: attend�thong Iv, ich turn - noteand nation against so much oi the

- ?l&#39;l&#39;.gii181.u;92PP8:�0tI;i:-y he has. no orit§&#39; cismei er 0, skulduggeryfatii

tempted ii U"; ¢".�"- � 1

&#39;_ �§<.:&#39;hisopiire1iia"&#39;may have totechnically with mental dieordexfibut it_is popularly used for plain?two-mmdedness. ,Ae witness the�schizophrenia of I Supremeready and eager to iitrain the _atitution and reverie the pr _"

deg: in fever oi the NAACP.str coustructionist all the �ey

. a£ainet�h81Pil1l the FBI and &#39;Congress catch cominunist sub �=

_vee..&#39;~ -&#39;1; ;- . -, .

And Ike-vetoins for e

W .._�_§¬

kuioutsiders a gee bill he

_ ignoring ekulduueryin the civil rights

4--f ..=¢."¢l»-&#39;1- -nit�;

t euf�cient knowlqheu-IL...�

I

es

"M2-

. W�

�/ Q o e

Moln-llr. Parsons

1 Hr. RoomHr. TammMr. Tl.&#39;»�H»81&#39;__.._

___ _ Mr. Nease_.__V� Tele. Boom___-_.

Mr. Holiomln..;..,Miss � &#39;

|

7 /

STATE T ~1ES

JACKSON, MISS. .8/23/5?Page 9 A C015. 7 8.".

r51 .».

1. - r�

--4. .-¢

a "-1-"P

5;!�-.:

Q._-.~

... _-~1??"

1I

&#39; 4.

-»&#39;-+5

-2:3.5-�is

I _..8

II

é

1.a -

,a »_ � r_��&#39;� __,_92;i-nhlimn-at ____ __&#39; l:��t~�*-10¢!�J� 1... _-its--_�;:_�� =r� , 1&#39;

O

LL� as� .

�lm; the audacious and illegal decision:dered by the United States Supreme

at its recent as-salon was one depriv-&#39; ~�-li¢!tlt¢l_9fl1I¢_ri8httiopresuibeq1mlif-

ona tor persona who seek to engage hi

the practice of 1aw.&#39;Aa well said by SenatorJBHIIQ-P. of India-M. this is essentially andparticularly a_ local matter, which each statemust be permitted to decide for itselt, Yet

Supreme Court or the United States. inrecent Schwara and Konigberg - eaeea,

a ectlng applicants for the bar to New Mex-! and California, respectively, denied the1&#39;18&#39;nt oi a state to require an applicant foradmission to the bar. in the course of beingexamined as to his character and �tness toPf��li�� IBW, to answer questions designedto elicit information bo &#39;� a at past connectionsand associations with Communists And Com-

fmu &#39;st organizations, and denied the rig�t� State Supreme Court to find that10" Ime association of an applicant withe uni.stParty.laamembero§<su

.1

J92

&#39;92&#39;921_

5SEP11&#39;195i7 7&#39;fl

1

-&#39;1»

e___ ..�..._, _-;~ 92 it _-&#39;~�-_f.-11ov_�_ &#39;--~-. &#39; - .

party, was a proper factor to be considered" 7&#39;in determining the character and �tneas at�lclpplicam. &#39;> =-"�-

In the words ,0! the reaolu�on_1itcredChiet Justice Norman I". &#39;A1-terbura at umSupreme Court at Indiana, at the recent

meehingotthe Chief Juaticeaot the sub J ,6; 92SupremeCourta: - � "

-- Ilr. �IE ,4Mr. Board - J

. - Ir. Belmont

Mr. Kohl�, fMr. Pane ._ &#39;Ir. Rosen . tIs. Tamm 7,HI. Tlo£l»eI__.__.

Mr. Neale ___._.._

�Ida. Room_._..

Hr. Hoiloman_...- III GlIIdy__..

i

"The United States Supreme� EA �EsIra-naaeued sound lelal principles, andparticular, usurped tact-�nding functions. .

"Moreover, the United StatesCourt has encroaehed upon the juriadicti0f�IBltltQQOIll&#39;tl-u-&#39;. f� -_

�Although the United States Supreme

Courthaatheauthorityto�xitsowns&#39;tand-arde of character and �tness to practice inthe Federal� courts, we do not recognise nuconcedethatitmaydoaotor theeoutt-ailthe ae-veral states of this Union." ~

It may be there are other area; in whi

lthe appellate jurisdiction of the SupreCourt should be restricted or with respect

jvhich auch jurisdiction should be withdraw

o~*"Jd92 lianfi

92 92Qr}

92&#39;

-.1.lYi"�-�J

I

I� J

FREDERICK SULLENS,

EDITORJACKSON DAILY NEWSJACKSON, MISS.

-8/2t/svPage 6 C015. l 8:. 2

92 l

&#39;". -- Yell�

�J.J7;73c%L�i|&#39;£§¥&#39;nEE5§oaom 559 11 195?.

vjslll-I-|�II""&#39;*""&#39;-_

%�I ,

�A;� &#39;1:. -r"- &#39;

IHA .-,_-1. 2.,.3. __,,,_

$7-2:;-.7-;¢ A� ._. ._;"»-.-~g-L&#39;-r&#39;*

�W-V l� R ..

, .

43..

�f�. . _ iTu,�

J1. .;_ _ ,, .___~_&#39;...~ _

_,I�_-w-I:_&#39;_,!:9,-_;"_ 5.-1

~<--___

&#39;1-"3""

f.9

» 4/,

.1___:e:__e _ ____��~ re _ &#39; �h� &#39; I A�1lIll�i1 &#39; &#39; 3* ;*_"�-"&#39; -T7 &#39; &#39; " &#39; 4&#39; _ 7&#39;77� T &#39; �>��� 7 7 7 7 W T � - &#39;77 -

0-ll Rot O-1�-56]

/

&#39; F" &#39;"" �_ _ . ..

LB. Y¥Td,§�?9P¢§ f l

,. ,-. . -I-Ill�

BERRYVILLE� Au

b H- . . ,, l0oe11nf&#39;_&#39;.&#39;r& =:�.¥,&#39; &#39;_ &#39;4;-92.. &#39;

31enator Harry�! Byrd D Va

SE

o__ s and ngresslegislation... �" .- --

- Q alieaking to ;5anu=1Ind aPPl9 &#39;g�rdwers&#39; gathered

is orchards here, Byrd

8-Ill

e p esent , Supreme "Cou

ritic pr£ncipies___o£&#39;our c

;_ lie cited �the 1954 schooldefeegregetion_ cese, Girard case,�the decision opening;�lea�_ and others, statiyg:§_ �It is e veri; sad ihing

&#39;I"&#39;|92|92wv92n- I� �-_--_. -..-----J.W uuuula elI:.ll.lCl&#39;§UB warnéfi

_lhe Supreme Court ingreatest menace to free 3grnment thet we have�?if llemede the speech atanau-lL..Qicnlc. The first,-92-l: 4&#39; . -1_.-�.A-v�-a:A1r=..92�a-ch.

FBI

1&#39; V7

�S . &#39; F .[today critici &#39; the pre nt

grep Oi appieustide no}

.92 A3�

i

Z" new--}aw &#39; "; 1

th lt-

my.

his31E.

inid 92rt

�went; to destroy the Delp

"I 92%"&#39;f

e. ,*-.*._&#39;-.- >_,-.&#39;»#-__92- -|;-�_&#39;._.�-.§-*1�.year: ago, wee 1 g¢¢.gq;¢m¢,-

�far. apple zrowém, hikrnew

920cl&#39;ll1c.politic1.92n;&#39;g 5 .-. Looking hale and helrty andhardly the 70 yelri he is, Byrdappraleed the session of Con-zrssa just ended: .. - .- , e "3

The only good thing thatw|s__ done wags ta cu: 9_!9l3!!&#39;li-92turee.. I! anything else goodW" @0118. I can&#39;t recall 1L"

He eyes particularly criticll�of the civil right! legislation�enacted, e , .~ . e - _; --P "What has the Sou�i doife

qto deserve iiiis� treitment?" hithe tdem�nded. �It is distresaini

�for any Administration ,to �try,.�l0 pass any legislation 10 timeJust, to force us to accept,something we cannot lceeptRae. helm, !&#39;e:&#39;e .-..., V�.-_,__

U -.1~ --I~�-~&#39;--04¢�-l92.:-1&#39;!92.�.r-..h-.»iu

:1 r:

Jc.-�-..&#39;, ,4

the �W-mt is an -�mun and: ,Walter E. offman,&#39;ot Norfolk,sion forivirginire Lop Deni-&#39;_

.3

>fY§.EQ-i92 /

Pareane ..___

FionaTatumTrotterNeon __i.

Tole. Room _._.

Holloman _..._.._G and 92-=492 - -

�I1JI£If�m1i.;&#39;u;l.� <h�1aa.;-�oi E§¬¬fE13i,i1én�¢i&#39;iE&#39;*£ni§ �ea?inn 3," - L _ e 92 end, thejpdliticimja left. �-""» ==11==1 we we *1-M P» 1.-P°..�.&#39;EE�?§.�£ fbrre. 5-?"-i _visijn of the final bill :1 great an ...;d,:3�:;nu�ca;�vvI;flla,

.v1c ry I0! U16 Sw4§b- Lindsay :_ Almond _J&#39;r., for eon}I gyro, epeaking from one at en-nor, A. 1;, S. Step_heneto:1,[1i�r;_;p"p1= truck}, surrounded §:1l_1$n;n§h§§;§rn?rl- 13¢ WE"""""&#39; u _ . &#39; _ B OI�! OHPI; f§i�.�"&#39;1��§l"f_-?3&#39;.rfi A.&#39;lPl?.:e&#39;r1era1 whom Byrd in5 1&#39;-*i92.*.=-"-_ ?""=."="�1&#39;=F, "F511 duccd is the next� eE¢te*�%§.1 &#39; &#39; &#39; Jphat �atone oi his favorite tar-. . ce1&#39;|.l:-=~�.&#39;-"--� " =&#39; &#39;

.ge&#39;r.s.--Fediial� District JudgeL �ah-_5.tg..; ~.- - 92whd.ha: declared unconstitu-tional the Stare�: Pupil Place-;meet Ac; designed. gc preeeryg.{school segregetiozg�-""* He quagled Holman afgay-King_ _the gegtegaiion issu11;¬92?F!&#39;f�Wi1I gbe settled untilF en¬�1_elderl_hip u chanled,� gid &#39;By:d:_ &#39;-�It that�: the_ca&#39;n,,xi.-.. &#39; ope � 1_t . never he�eett d;&#39; _ �i 1 &#39;

en-Byrcljnished talk! ,lhe . as gigen a standing av -~tio appleexperts began fe -[§11;:__ _ .craw�d,_about the lat

Wash. Post andTimes Herald

Wash. News __.______

Wash. Star

N. Y. Herald ______.._

Tribune

N. Y. Journal-

AmericanY. Mirror

-inc--i�

-nin-i|�

!

£II

K -JL/ by George E. Sokolsky, September l, 1957

I

�x

92v92

K;

U

3&#39;92_

. . _ , | *u&#39;c&#39; LY sumzux NIGHT BROADCAST.

Q, �vsnxcm BROADCASTING conmxr ,_

EVENTS OF THESE DAYS. BUT FIRST MAY I PRESENT OUR ANNOUNCER FOR A

I M� � " |�Teie. T-cani-

Mr Holiuman.Gun�n-

e DUPTBHIB 92.|D�L&#39;l.1"Ii Q L5�!

The Supreme Court has had before it 29 cases dealing withcivil rights but involving in most instances criminals, spies, communistsevil and malicious persona. In cases in which full opinions were preparewere uanimous and in four the only dissenter was Justice Tom Clark. _Justice Frankfurter wrote a concurring opinion, particularly when he apparentlyfelt that his brothers on the bench were running away with their logic.

GOOD EVENING» THIS IS GEORGE SOKDLSKY TRANSCRIBING ON THE

rad _ I!_/"A - -"4&#39; 7 .

d n

The reason that the Supreme Court took this position is that because ofchanges in the Court during the Eisenhower Adinistration, the Court shifted froma majority that accepted a doctrine of strict construction of the Constitution to£!;¥r�a majority that believes in such loose construction of the Constitution as toamount to independent legislative action. k!k9

The Comission on Law and Social Action of the American Jewish Congresshas issued a brochure on the subject, highly praising this Court but on groundswhich are clearly incorrect. After stating the change in personnel after theappointment to the bench of Messrs. Warren, Harlan, Brennan and Whittaker, thisAmerican Jewish Congress pamphlet says:

�The other crucial factor explaining the reversaltof the Court&#39;s positionis the sharp lessening of international tension during the past few years. Whenthe Cold Her was most severe, the fear of Communism within the United Statesreached extreme proportions. The Supreme Court reflected the popular mood and wasreluctant to upset any government attempts to control internal subversion.

"With the easing of relations between the United States and the SovietUnion, there has been a substantial lessening of fear about domestic Comunists asa serious threat to America. The Supreme Court both reacted to and helped shapethis new climate of security by issuing a series of decisions that have moved thebalance in_favor of constitutional liberties."

This report was issued in August 1957 when the relations between theUnited States and Soviet Russia were at their lowest. Syria had just taken stepswhich virtually made that country a satellite of Soviet Russia. Egypt is conduct-ing a violent anti-American campaign throughout the Arab world, particularly

c=

i

_ __ ____ r _- _ _ -�»_¢ _ -,__L:_-�~-,:��--7--. �-��-all:-r "� 7 ~�_� ~. -._..,_ _ei_4______,-. my ___7 as _ ..___-_ __.__

4 &#39; -

- &#39; 0 -2- Q 0As a part of this propaganda, the American passport is being reduced to a meaning-less, purposaless scrap of paper that is no longer respected in many parts of theWorld e

Cold Var dead! How can any intelligent person who has any familiaritywith current conditions in the world ignore the fact that we are in the center ofthe Cold War, probably in its worst period, what might be called the Egyptian pe-riod, and that there are all the dangers of a fighting war in the Syrian situation?

# 4 #

There are wide differences of opinion concerning the Supreme Court deci- I

others holding, as I do, that they can only lead to anarchy and that they imperilthe United States. But it is impossible, under the American Constitutional system,to justify these decisions on the grounds that the American Jewish Congress does.Because what this pamphlet before me seeks to establish, it seems to me, is that

. lsions, some holding that they represent a reaffirmation of the Bill of Rights; &#39;

the Supreme Court is a political rather than a juridical organ of governmentthat President Eisenhower packed the Court for this purpose and I quote frompamphlet: �

andthe

"As a result of these shifts of personnel, the core of conservative votesthat dominated the Court during the Vinson era has been replaced by a liberal groupconsisting of Justices Warren, Black, Douglas and Brennan. This bloc needs thevote of only one other Justice, in order to command a majority of the Court."

The accusation here is not only against President Eisenhower, of abusinghis power of appointment, but against the Senate Judiciary Comittee, headed bySenator Eastland, of confirmdng improper justices, and against Justices Warren,Brennan and Whittaker of accepting a seat on the Supreme Court bench for improperpurposes� It is impossible to believe such nonsense, no matter how much onegrees with the opinions of the learned justices. 3

# # #

Congress has corrected one of the errors of the Court. This is inmatter of the Jencks Case, the decision of the Court having opened the files

r the FBI to kidnappers, murderers, Communists, spies and other criminals. Ittrue that the Supreme Court had no such intention, that its decision applied

M to criminal cases and only required that such documents be made available to

the production even of raw FBI files. It is therefore absurd to assume that

holiday.

92C House, was better, but the same trickery was employed, principally under the

1 tives passed a good bill.

# # #

92 As necessary as it has been for the Jencks Decision to be corrected by

disa-

the

ofisonlyde-

J fense counsel as would assist the defense. However, already judges in the loweri courts have been giving the Jencks Decision the widest interpretation, calling for92 8-11

undefined access to these files is safe; it only gives shyster lawyers a Roman

t The 0&#39;Mahoney Bill, in the Senate, was amended under the aegis of Sena-� has Clark of Pennsylvania, Javits of New York and Morse of Oregon who succeeded

in so watering down the bill as to make it useless. The Keating Bill, in the

� leadership of Representative Emanuel Celler of Brooklyn, Chairman of the House

i,,.H,__A .__..> - -- - �-� - --_- � �- ��_~ � A�����~ _____ __ _ _ , __,____________ _ ,_____ ,,._.

Congress, even more important, it seems to me, is it necessary to correct the errorin the Mallory Decision. This is a case involving a rapist who confessed to thisdastardly crime while being held by the police of the District of Columbia. TheCourt let this rapist go free, not because he was not guilty, but because the policeheld him too long between arrest and arraignment and asked him questions after heu-nu n&#39;|wIn|s&#39;|>_n I -numb� 92-nave; win-II

Speaking practically, the Mallory Decision makes police work impossible.The police will have no techniques available to them to hold suspicious persons.

It is growing increasingly difficult to fight crime, particularly in our big citieswhere the nature of crime has changed from robberies, burglaries, arson and lar�cenies, to juvenile and sex crimes, including rape and murder related to rape andfetishism. In cases of this nature, the police usually are called in too late intothe situation, when clues are cold and the case has to be built block by block outof suspicions and general information. Under the Mallory Decision, it is likelythat the police will have fewer weapons at their disposal. They will be hamperedby criminal lawyers who will employ both the Jencks and the Mallory Decisions againstthem.

Only �hot house" lawyers could have handed down such a decision as theMalloryu i .

###-

Sound American doctrine accepts the view that the defendant is entitledto know the nature of the felonies or misdemeanors with which he is charged; to befaced by his accusers; and to have a trial in an open court before a jury of his

peers and represented by counsel. But this does not mean that the police power ofgovernment should be abolished and that government should have no means to protectthe life and property of its people. Such a course is anarchy. Only Pharisaicmentalities, living in a vacuum, could believe in such an anarchy.

# # #

IN JUST A MOMENT, I&#39;LL es BACK wrm YOU.

###

The Wisconsin election to fill the Senate seat of the late Joe McCarthywas won by the Democrats in an astonishing upset. Walter Kohler, who had beenGovernor of Wisconsin for three terms, who had the support of President Eisenhower

and who has been regarded as an Eisenhower man, was roundly defeated.

It was a defeat for Eisenhower and his Modern Republicanism. It meansthat enough Republicans in Wisconsin voted Democratic or did not vote at all tomake the differece. The ghost of Joe Hc�arthy walked in that election.

###

THANK ICU. THIS IS GEORGE SOKOLSKY. GOOD NIGHT.

-ooOoo-

/it 7,

I A W: 7_,4t__j__L_;-_.V_.._,,,re _-1-, .____- ���1~I-In-� . --1" Y" &#39;; ��~"&#39; &#39;* &#39; � " &#39;-&#39;7 &#39;7

� ,0-rs&#39;1a&#39;n. s-1-sol -

�£21-*¢"=

I-1*P!" ".F- .-.

--�E--.L-&#39; . 7.s"-*4.�.3-

5»?-1*-�it.F

.r,

are-.r.;.Z

&#39;:- = .-

1� "=11"� :.&#39; 1:_92-3-;-= it:

..--&#39;-:- .1__|&#39;.�&#39;v&#39;

--r

�Fr

�:;;- f&#39;�*7: "-�.&#39;

-":6

r -51;;--

},#5

-5, .

I-

Ii

- TRIAL T0 -RE192IEMBE§tifT!�.�teSAMUEL CHASE I

5 Ii-.&#39;Diggin&#39;g&#39; around in histories and reference boolrs&#39;_ for;._ &#39; terisl for oui-."Amer-icnns to ltememberf� Sunday edl-=,gtorials, we&#39;ve krun atcross the story pi.� en almost, forgottenl" � &#39; &#39; &#39; trial which we,think_American_s;

W18-v� s1.-wllld by �ell mém remw.- -

It was the&#39;hi;.i on impeach--"charges of a U. B. Supreme-Associate Justice, no less. l

seems well worth retell-&#39;..days, grhea more and

ore of "as are fwonderirig ewliat"anything can be done to persuede

Earl Warren Supreme. _C_ourt&#39; toaid and cémiort to the

in t.i1�= 0!. sold

we - ncren y,wo1rrya u&#39;__eT

;. , 5"&#39;"1=|. QF".-4 e Suprem�e&#39;.Court-is nothing new,-,LAB long�ago as 1823, Thomas Jefferson wrote to s;-f�endfof his that �there is no dan e I h d

mif

- &#39; _ _ e , 3&#39; 1&#39; appreen so znuch as_the._&#39;;eor_3sol1dation of our _Gove&#39;rm&#39;nent [into one all-powerful T-organization based _in Washington] bi the �noiseless&#39;,.kand_.Ehe:-retfgre _unaler:_ni_ng, in_strun_aenta_1ity_ lot" the Suprernef

0 , ,__-_-.-. �- f. ,-1-.,. .-&#39;={_;t-,5�. .- L itsun earlier �821!, �Jefferson� sea .-&#39;e&#39;rsiree.inelne�-"�

;friend that "it has -long T. ; . been my opinion . ; . that the."g&#39;erm of dissolution of federal� government is in the con-_stituti&#39;on of the federal judiciary; an irresponsible body, for impeachment is scarcely s. scarecrow!�, working likegravity by night and day. gaining a _1it_tle today� and is &#39;

qhttle tomorrow, and adpvancrnggts noiseless step&#39;.1ik9 jl &#39;l Lthief, over the �eld pfjurisdiction, until all shall be usurped e

frgom the�States_, and the governrnent of all be cénsogdstefi &#39;-n on , &#39; .-.. ~ -i}"..�*_"~_._- ., - -- -

I &#39;.The Supreme. Court justice referred to above foundifuthat impeachment was something more than the riui-rescare-crow which Jefferson believed it to be. * 92&#39; 1 *1� tr»:

&#39;IC�%ais jurist rages Siginuel Chase &#39; _1.741-1811!; -""3-Q. 7".� Q";use was ee_vat_ to the S _ Court f lth ;¢

]é_U Iary1arrd, }_enera1tC§>�urt in 119%. �llisrtrlielszl .emi:l1e£1:£¬e.:Hmg |-&#39; ave -&#39; &#39;

lBully 01!? b echme.%onlgul1 :ioz¬r and �gr? bi&#39;<?v:beatig1&#39;t_&#39;.Il:_Y � &#39; � of attomey&#39;s1.snd courfe ted ts.- On�?

B§&#39;?�r"&#39; two&#39;o.c"casions&#39;, eminentLIas»?yI:;r:nwsB:ed. ,&#39;§__o&#39;ut of court because of Chase. -- .~ ,;-;__-f; -*11.~�-*-_» ,;j - {Once-he le_�_:_ the Supreme Court without"; quorum"_ lule he went on a political speechmaking tour.- ; J�.-T " -_&#39;~

&#39;shr1:oiipIe of case?! by the� court in 1800, Chase"1 w s � e _aw unmerc u_ _ in order to bring in decisions?&#39;~f9fT!�I;&#39;D!r£1@.=. he ea;

ué bti� 5 �g]?

9/ o <3 1/

Mm?Parsons Z_...-Halon __--Tamar ____--

Trotter .__i-

Neaso _i---Tele. Room __..

olloman _...._-

and? �-�-+���

�U

I417 -/?7;�<£_iY&#39; 4&#39;NOT RECORDED

141$-EP F1951.

_

Wash. Post and __._.__..

Times Herald

Wash. News ____.-_-

Wash. Star

N. Y. Herald ._._._.__._

Tribune

N. Y. Journal-_.......__._

American

N. Y. Mirror

N. Y. Daily News _rf__N. Y. Times .__-_�-

Datly Worker _-__-_....._..-

The Worker ,_,____.___...

New Leader .____-_-

ii-Z-�1|�

es;-.1. es»______i T �¢

e

-1

7" &#39;

"-Q"?-1;" as, 92 , r._ "xii.; .&#39;_

-2*:

. Y5"-_ ,_,a.

-V..._ %~_,.~._-* hr.-»&#39; -awvq... .7---e,--¢ &#39;

!¢ =.1.? *¬ _¢u��&#39; 1

3%:;_.....-

Elf" I

»

¢.�I

F *1

392

4.I�F

u .5

T [n_Ee.bru£r§&#39;of_T8§E]TEtice Chase deliver g-iremembered speech to&#39;a grand jury in Baltimore. In thisdiatribe, he screeched that the United States was going tohell in a handbasket because Congresswas passing laws

1 affecting the federal judiciary, setting up universal �suff-rage, and acting in-various otherhways which he didn&#39;tapprove. The Executive branch came_in&#39;for a similar�cuss-ing-out. We should, Chase concluded, become a monarchy;

0

. , _g �.9 - &#39;_f~>; .1-_ I ...»:,~.�,;,_&#39;»¢;f,; _-_� -.,;That speech tore it. President Thomas Jefferson read

it. and immediately suggested to Rep. .To:eiph&#39;Nic_hoisonof Maryland that Chase should be impeach � := &#39;1 .

- Jeiferson kept in the background, as be�tted the Presi-dent. Theimpeachment was moved in _the House by the.giamous and �ery John Randolph of Roanoke, Va., and thepHouse_ on N_ov. 30, 1804, indicted Chase on eight counts.. - - . � , , His trial by the Senate ranCh_ase_¬ot A_wa_y from Jan. 2 _to March 1,_1sos.._W;¢h fg._.Bug_é__y _ Qhase might well have been15 _ a_ .» . ~ _ convicted by the necessary two-thlrds vote of the Senate, had somebody besideslohn Ran-dolph been attorney for the prosecution..- -. _; I3 �~._;.=@

§ Unluckiiy for Chase&#39;s foes. Randolph was a goo&#39;d den?Lbetter at making*a �erce, dagger-sharp speech than =he92w�as;at_haudling a trial in a court. His conduct during Chase�;Itrial in the Senate seems to have been just aboutas offen-�Lswe as Chase&#39;s own rudeness on the bench had been.�I Chase eventually was &#39;hcquit&#39;ted, though Senatecame within four votes of convicting him on one of theeight counts. He resumed his seat on the Supreme Gourt,i;_wh&#39;ere, says t_he Encyclopedia Americana, F�he continued toexercise his Judicial functions with the highest reputation

- 77*?� V i H W _ _ ____ _ _ _ _ __ ...... --~»� ---- -I --i

!¢

92.r>lPr

ii

Ir

E

till 1811, in �which year his health £aiied."~- &#39; -� 1"� ~ 5&#39;;_S_o Chase got away with his misconduct. But the fact

"remains that Congress �nally called him on it,- and hispeachment made him a sadder-,_wiser and more cautious mad.", " It seems unnecessary to point out the moral of all thisto-presentday americans. I j _ ,-&#39;;:&#39;J

>6

i

I2

""" - &#39; &#39; &#39; - "&#39;13 -&#39;. . . . ..." - ".1": r " .~ - »~ -~ --- -. - --.

&#39; - =&#39; "&#39; ..&#39;.--."~< *-~ .- . --. -.r~*~ �.~ ..- .. . ..

_._. -_- .1�! 1-��n; _.- �K--.�.&#39; . -.

- 3-�. "r .�.*&#39;*F~.-§T�.;e+,&#39;-5:k�-1- 1 . ..~.~&#39;7. 5�. -.�-£.&#39;.=&#39; F; r -"iv__...;._- E7_, �T ll-us-r. &#39;. , 1&#39;-_.&#39;.&#39; - �- -..,;:&#39;i� r~<&#39; -P-.�-- &#39;.. 1. �f..&#39;. .�1"&#39;1.-.�|. ..

bi�...-.&#39; ;__ �.1 �.3 __- 2:.¥iI,_w | - 3,: ,__, ;"_~_ 9». J V.;&#39;i,|:l�q;,V.-I W

-~ _ _- � -".-- . 4-_.<~ .."92. -$1.,-qt," 1--"&#39;*-�-. ."�~.�-" =&#39;- f*~�-&#39;:""*&#39;*�i&#39;.;--""�3_-.&#39;r;�F"&#39;.�.�%g*.&#39;:�Pi &#39; - &#39;* -+"&#39;- §�~;- -_*.�-"Q

.1. .-.._J,- w &#39;*&#39;_&#39;..?T&#39;.92_ _� _

~" . _.-�.&#39;.�s.. ., _ ,&#39;:&#39;.&#39;_.92 ,&#39;.r&#39;;A_92.,". I. ,

-1; _

if.! I1� j-92 .

-4, *4 ,_� _~ +.,.-- .0 ..~ r. ._. 5. _._i_,".. �

;-. "_. -:- ,. .&#39; ._ .� 1-. . -~. 1-_~ � .- _¬ .». -r. ":.;,.r_~*,$i;.:.92z-:_;._.=".-:&#39;_.é!=,�-:92_;-.-.; .&#39; - . A .&#39;-~&#39;-o- ..;-~. - _ . -_,-&#39;-- &#39;- &#39;, � - &#39; >- &#39;.._., __�r._, __ A ..a _ _ _

-.--- -&#39; ..-.1-.-..�.[._-92;, _ _ _:� _L __.-_-Q, If �.92�,i__.� . _ �-.�J _».&#39;:.�_�..�:_."--.,, . .- .� -..

- .&#39;_":- -.. _ . .*_ . -~-:- -&#39;- -, :_.:�-...

-_a . 92 , r _ ....92__. .6

E i --� .. > �-

1 -..

E

�*" � U.� .&#39;i"*&#39;. -. p- .--- . _&#39;._&#39;.»d_*A"9

. .,|_ _

.f- . �__ . . ;-r� r _. _- V �,1: � ._ . _&#39; W .> 92 0 �I _._ A rI1 J 1" A 7 K:

. , _ u - .

. 92 _ �_ _"_?- Q� 1

. ~ � &#39;U}lI| .�

9292_ ., v _.1" I ..

I92

�i 92 1_92 1 ..I V � &#39; r|. P1 92 . &#39;-

&#39; " 1 .

7�-�!f7�:-92&#39; . -- 1�.-> sf-

1} i� _� 1 _ . _,§_ .1 __. N� P"F"-. -&#39; -�-~"*"�,� l&#39;.&#39;~�&#39;. �. - �-�- -* �.1-" -. 1.-4-,,-V, &#39;P ~ _ 92_ -, _ -&#39;_;_92_L..92 -.»"&#39; -1 -..I.r -1-.-»._¢.~~ . - &#39; &#39;

�Qt? &#39;5� 1"?� 1- -&#39; "! -*��""-[vi -4 - .,&#39;."92:-" ..T.=5.{&#39;¢7§�.r�: - " .1 , �_92

1.....�;E� �._ I&#39;1&#39;.?";,_,-..&#39;...92.- . ._,.1_&#39;92-_$..-<&#39;>;;,.__:-I .._..r _ .

.

F�.-° ?��"&#39; *1" Wmmwst prov.

0&#39;

E?� . �I-... w ___ &#39;*r"$»:_�-F �nu - &#39; - &#39; Iv...;.. . -- - -. -. ...- . 1&#39; --*5 :1- mm" .. _ 11;-3&#39;:-,_?_---.-.-.--~ . ,. &#39; --

15;; 4. ._,,~ | ,_ _,. .. .� , _ff F" -1 &#39;*=>&#39;--3�1-- -r.--.- .- A .. .-a -- .. -. ..... . -

... .. .41 »92 .� ,_� ,_ _. _._� X.� ,, 4, .b &#39; 1 _ ",�:e_- 1 _ v :1. .1 IL an ax, -7 V h �- ,.. ,;_. __ _ _- 1- - . -1- _

.16}! COURT�! POWER&#39; r&#39; - --~-*1 - -.- :-.~-.-�§-.-&#39;---&#39;--1 -- . ..., ..q. __7� A_wunhwa &#39; .-

.&#39;-.--".1

P�*&#39;"°!=f� ma ?ca-mu M11 M My the swine

°�-&#39;4 -°3&#39;.41�l=l .0! wbwerlim. nr°°"w==nt 0! can";-Q,� ..1_,,&#39;.;,*,; _.- .&#39;-�.1 will gntnumm u;u;&#39;|,g@...r,A_.-A -ttrvmoqe 11.. .au2 :_.&#39; &#39;.PN__me C0urt&#39;| appellitg Jul-|;&#39;¢;°_

* ""1 1Mhi=.=1m=-7-. Ilmii -sw.,- -F -

9&#39;.°.!!I!.*!="!1"_II: _-m-_¢-;_92.¢. .,_ .

n ¢e<1_ �u court.,., _"__&#39;rm�Senator -.1 &#39; - _ -Pm� _._ _a.{d,|ueh Q:

&#39;§g59lIll0tod.!5rtlchIIIot:11¢qm_: - _w�tution: �"311; . P -

mun hm lppeiI::P;&#39;e:n0 00:; ..3 5u=E.¢X0QpUOnl um um] . _

."I-151110 words, Q, �:,�;4&#39;:,°: .im� �*3 if �$z|l1,&#39; mum.�°�¢�&#39;*1&#39; . to pa. 1.-w.

-prlv � __

. 8Q� V J &#39; �- _ .

*P"°§§=&#39;== &#39;-h:I::;g1::l£g:1&#39;::uwu:e. .�he �Wed lhlt the 001111 wgg.&#39;92.|.ndel&#39;mln.ing effort; of the p�_P10�! flliresentatim�onn ma .¢.=."§&#39;-v7§.".&#39;},"�.,2§

-&#39;.,_

92_J92.. ~

|.. &#39;1hp� ma-�y; , - -. � . _r- mm . , r _ " ..., 11;, -1.1.3:�. �_-;-,_"592:._--:4�?-K:_;_&#39;, I _w &#39; ~ - � , =J ¢., -_.,_-.. .-_._

A -9

tolaw mu mt, mm _

|l� � I

L1!-llto�-1;urluglctlu:1,c:outr.|: °,&#39;,-F� - ..

I *ll.-. ..-I! " . ~Hr. &#39;-�Y.Hr B = ""~

�

T#2 -

._ --~- "

-!.:;¢z¢~ &#39;T;§&#39;.;.. .-

�s

Mign-Giddy I" - &#39;. -1 -. 92 &#39;

-"&#39;,i-1----i&#39;-_,_, ;

~-&#39; .&#39; -- .,-�m. /�_._

VG �Dull h 92, -9 &#39;,_ .__ :.-_ §_&#39;..V_-__ ;.3__. - &#39;".;.&#39;.:-,&#39;.."� I

. _.. . _�_ .4»; 1.- J� &#39;.&#39; . 1

I " ~. s q |- . ,.._-.V.L :1 ;_<:.-,.E

. . ,_�_;.__.," j,_._- 3 &#39;..-.&#39;._.,;._ ..,-1:;__._.._.._H_.._9 .__ _ _

&#39;1-. .,,-._..immediate! _ . _. . _k _._. glxmch mum 5.. . .� I

� -"_&#39;r** -.~:-w-*.1f:.. .. C�. �~�.%�&#39;$?.~92":_ �gm.-"�--4

-! ,_-1.,�-._�--� .&#39;.&#39; .-� 1

-_&#39;.&#39;1¬&#39;*:"92&#39;-.- &#39;92&#39;

.- &#39; -&#39; »&#39;- &#39; .1 . - -&#39; . &#39;-1. � ,.. -h �. � --* .""--;+",-- &#39;-: � �

;- - --."&#39;*<¢ -.-._&#39;.~§ -.- ,_i- ,,.&#39;.4-.&#39;,.~�1�; .. - _L!_� �.:r.:.{__.-___f.

. _ .__-...- .

I� : I I &#39; f l* - 92 - u - . _ .4, ..~ - ~, _ _ 4 _ � -_ -. .92 1 k � 92 � v - ,-92-uh.-_,_�, �*5,-S...�

, , . - 1 _ ."&#39; a &#39; . --

. , � 1 - " .., , ,,- .,&#39;|-. ,___ .. _ - , l._- .&#39;_ l,;V:v:.._:<1- ..- It

., ,. - J.... 1

1" . .- , ,-,a --

7 1. 92

..|&#39;. .&#39;

. _ f..

_ ~ V x I �� _ .-- -1-;i_..,� ._.-.,_ ..§T=<&#39;.=. 7.,-&#39;_-_ " _._. ~._ . :. _ . * K ~ ;. . --

. �Z1: - __- ,~ �I; §- _-. &#39; Qf . . ,_ -

-.

l. ,.-.

i&#39;r.._»1 .." "I 4 .

"&#39; " " &#39; . .1� 5" . --- .. .&#39; 5 .- u .1._ p 92 e &#39; - _. __ __�J | i

.5� ¢>...v.»-- - . =. ,. .n *� -_.- ..-H�: _ &#39;k &#39;

&#39;0 .&#39; &#39;I 3 &#39; &#39;. � _ . &#39; .&#39;_ -. - � /&#39; � - _ .

.� , . . _ - l _F» .! . .-&#39;,-�.- >- -. ."&#39;-�.-1--..,.. _

u _ __,,_H=M._h. ,;aL__-� � 1 -&#39;�&#39;��* 1&#39;--B-*7. -_ -=&#39;w.~>~.�..1&#39;-.>&#39;¢"r--

- , ,

"1 � .

_._ _ _�1., __ , _ _ |_ _ 92____{ __ _ M -� � I-. ;_-5;, _ --.

. . M.� . X� -1 � . , :" I . q _�q;__ ;_ | . -1... - "&#39; _. J; L. &#39; �. .. _ _ __._ . _;_ &#39; &#39;.-*_- -� -r &#39; I�-IL _; i-H19. &#39;|&#39;_�r?"{f__ _ *,w_ ..~~ .- - Q_� Q" �_ &#39;¢�".~�p_-92__..4&#39;?;.�P&#39;_£_- "�&#39; �HP: .:L; J t_"=, -&#39;.j_,;_-. � ||&#39; &#39; _, _f¢&#39;_ - ~&#39;-. _-_. _- 11-?¢_92 /3;�. " 2...l 1 ,,. _ ... , >, ..._ _ ., . � , .. .,_ ..., ,3: .. v ,. ..|92_ -..&#39;-gt .,. 1 3� .,_._,~ ., _ -�Q _< - - &#39;- -�.&#39;.- Iv-� .-. .-------. i-v -. .-QM .--~.§_ .»qQ -- 3 ~ &#39; � &#39; �� &#39;---�-I»!. ,| - i �_ . W-7 - -&#39;1. _� "1&#39;-&#39; .- .»�_ Q&#39; . ~; " 4 " &#39;" - - ;

92 :.&#39; �-, .,&#39; .-_ .

I� _ _, .

-. - &#39;.-_� k H. """ u »&#39; . &#39; ~ 92 -_ -_-... - 1 .. .. .

92 -_ �V / &#39; ,1 _ .. � _&#39; �I , . &#39;- &#39; , . . .1 . �~ �. -..� " &#39; &#39;~ .- i .&#39;.-&#39; &#39; &#39;1. -_ . .92__i�$w92_.3.;.-- &#39; �."C.�.f- �.�*I�.&#39;$&#39;_&#39;_..92r-_" I F� &#39; I � �_ V� I &#39;-&#39;--. &#39; wl &#39;.�,-Y"--�_".� "�&#39;-�&#39;_;I&#39;_921,:..,�

" - *1" . &#39; " &#39;"&#39;|Q,§NOT mzconnzo ._.&#39;-__;&#39;_j.:.�:-_�;;"�_._i&#39;: ..

� � P .~.." " � � � &#39; *&#39; " A &#39; 1 4 1.� __ --. _ .- _ - � 5 _ . . . - |. . . _

xi� � " &#39; --7 -&#39; � &#39; &#39;r~;.._.- L.-_ ¢..~ - V, »92_-_,.g. _. ." 5,- .. I t _� _ .-. . :&#39; .._/ 92-._ &#39;.. &#39;92$J&~ *&#39; .. , 1|

&#39; 2 5 . 14155? F1951. ."..=.l�- _.

.- -". A "= 1� .. &#39; : 92-- �&#39; - . . 1 . ~. , .- �- -- .. - &#39;-&#39;� - 9 - . . &#39;..; &#39; �&#39;~- -.. .., I�- -&#39;. _ . . ~r -.� &#39;1 �*1 :-�- &#39;- ». -¢ ;. h &#39;-."~&#39;Pwz» ., - --_ 92__. __ -- * . 92- I . - ,: � . - . -- _ 92.~_ -__ -- __;.- . . , -�-_- . .�_|�-* ,__ � . �.&#39;92____ __"&#39; . J� ""&#39; I -; > - - - -1-. � �T. ._ .&#39; _~ ..- _- 521., W . �.;f;,4_~_/, 92 � ,. - . _- ,- 1- . &#39;.&#39; � I &#39;a__, . &#39;-- 1;, -. --1 . � _ _ .. N .- 7-. 4 _ 1&#39; w- �-. -�"1 _ -L - |:.l .__� _ *1

p - .- J .i _. &#39; .._�_. � |� i--._ 1. .._i_92E_ .�:

- -,1.»

- . _.- _ � 1 ; &#39; &#39; &#39; 3. 4. . &#39;-� , ~-.� " .~_,- J� |- -. -. . .� _» ,_. - - _ _*,1. ,._ � .. - _ _ .92 _-~, � - ._, - _ -__ _

. ./r 1 � ._ <.<-|l&#39;4 .&#39;?- _ .. 11.. I� .:-&#39;,�_ �92~_ 92.. &#39;._ &#39;15. - _--.j___<,_. __ _1* � v- "- - -&#39;5 &#39;-. � � 3&#39; &#39; . .. 92&#39; � -.T�| 24&#39; ."?5��&#39;L-3, .__ &#39;92_ ; - .-. 92_- . ..-_-| J -�-_92|;;~ ~ qr, _ -_ . v �_._ _

st ._ 4" 92 � 92 &#39; M _"- =�- -.-._� _�m_ �_ ~ .__-W ..-&#39; "~ 1_~?_ K |.~ � l.",_.&#39;a., �

.~ . ;.1-..&#39;-921 :41._ . 7.. . I�?

. ~> " -Q T --&#39;6--_.< -- .- ~ -"-w...-�*1-* &#39;3 �E ,- 1-�-is 13¢,-",1-;-5.--_;<.&#39;-..--;;r.4:-q"-.241-...

}HlQi1, �:0lI.FiiS Dec|s|6�|1?Un >ub?�éFs&#39;|oin &#39;D&#39;ei5£itéd

1-.92.at-F"

. -_... ,92 &#39;__..-..,_ ~-&#39;:».=. age?

3.3?&#39;Et&#39;..i-s.£-3.-

...."-..a-

"

5.-_ ."�__J�; Q &#39;:==F.%=*-�s.

-lewd-&#39;-&#39;4"&#39;§--.....---

~i::_.. , �P75

H _

� 1*.�

it&#39;-

;-�, .;"~ .F&#39;92"

.�.i;¢.¢ .*:&#39; -LT:4251 �:&#39;

-5. R-*-I3?�-I

k . ,

&#39;.a__.-4|�s

.

=.�92&#39;;. &#39;

V 92I H

&#39;1&#39;!" Iliwaker asserted that

,teachin£ violent overthrow ofi�

0- ll HIV. O-1-5!!

The session held in the M

the Supreme C-&#39;ourt�Hesded?" . �ta� Qi92.e.reeter�.zir&#39;.g the rte�;c092n&#39;t&#39;s decisions, es �dead

"� l�1Eht" was _ rles is.92B@=l<>=1 lawyer an uthor.Present-ins a sharply�liv 1-gent

i. .-- _ _ - -ieral. n1n[gi§�mg|d Q mp.

&#39;.1Il.¬L.1llii£:_.qI then. s,_ Qqirtvfognpetgls for the"Dlstrlct was�tn era r. �_ I,

i Four Msior Cases .

Highlighted 1:1 teeciseussier.were the following cases: lN 1. Jencks, in whiclrthe Bu-Dreme Court ruled that per-tinent reports oi� FBI witnesses

ijwho testify aealnst a defendant42111� lie opened to his inspec-tion. 7 . . e "

2. Yates. in which the courtheld that the Smith Act doesnot prohibit advocating or

the Government as an abstractprinciple divorced from in? ef-

8- Sweezy. in which the court�fort to instisste action. 7

held that a contempt convictionfor e man who refused to answer1&#39;

3J�

1

questions of e New Hampshirelegislative committee as to 8university lecture he gave

_vio1ated _hls ConstitutionalN-rights to due process of law.-ti 4 Watkins which- . lp _ the

court held that the subject ofa Congressional inquiry and the!Je1t%cy of r-ny questionstmust be made clear to a witness.~ Referrlnl to the Jencks deci-sion Mr. Curtis declared: �Allitdfdwastotell the Justice3:2!-I"H�B.&#39;l1t_ to out up �or shut

&#39; 1 "tie! .3-�.*&#39;_�=

�ease would not have raised.�such a stir if Justice Clarknot made what seems to meBlfvliqulll ugicalled-for remark.when no said that �unless Con-

Lm" �hl�lél theizulhte, intelli� I _ w&#39; �_ I1 08 In ll �W8 �lam "

"P.vh¢e.&#39;-..-.-._..�I.&#39;Z*" ... _

; the topic &#39; In What Direction lea

opinion we Louis %- Wrg an,New Hompsh 1&#39; I gen-E

kj &#39; � �hnrnowiraorinurxm ;&#39;. _ ll�ecent gupreme Court decisionseln cases involving sub-

i

I,�

- 0

&#39; �"1 11 We" P" M. Fdikr easiest trrsnnr" me roiin�re��eize� as �civics unwhrrsnted meets» --

HtrietBa.r Assoclui:lonlestnizht.-- , i I-1-�-.&#39; . -� - _Y"°."t&#39;§&#39;;=¢i!.1=!e1."=i,srgw¢~

92_ 57-! _ �~_}.", _ &#39;

�"E"ea�s&#39;*g of the Yates cese.&#39;!�ilintn�izt m e&#39;W point as he saw it was the �deep�dl�erence hetween belief andlaction." He said that. in thatcase, the court had to decide�;

fwhether "we end Ccnzress areFtoo scared and too mm tejlook at things and think clear-�-ll _ � 1 . 1

� Of Bweezy, the speaker de-clared the New Hampshire au-

92� thorities "neslectedone thingthe respect pwe all owe to the1thought we-hate." He told his

ilisteners that he. too. wouldhave declined to answer ques-_

92 tions about university lectures

ll or his friends� ailiiiations imlesn�I too thought they were sub-&#39;1versive.� - 92 :-"&#39; _ _92 Mr. Wyman hammered at thepoint that a wide gulf ups-irates political belie! from mem-

bership lntor advocacy of "theGom.m1l_Me- Parts. conspiracy

tto do violence to all things wehold dear." . . i

Sees lncounleinenl _

Iii.� i _::_ :__ _ _ __��� 7777 7� �"�� �&#39; &#39;

A "

0 O _x

" &#39;~� 2 E &#39;l.�he_ court decisions. he said.-iaharply limited the_investi¢s-41

nothlns ca92n"be&#39; doneHe noted that such teachlnt?

can be especial]! harmful if

ressionable." Bees Prillfell Voideil 1&#39;

F-he audience is icons and h&#39;~�-r-

t_ive process at a time when pi

Tolso &#39; -

4/£2: manf&#39; &#39; Parsons

Boson

-->1Tr _

NooseTole. , _oin _

" uchof

D n to Communists by� I� coinrnunism poses a serlotfll If l-lollomcn _..__opposing speexere addressing en over�ow meetins oi the Dis- 1;m,,,M,_ ; N 92 Gcindy _.___oi; rlrosress that�,

-*ha.s&DYevio1Js-1! 99¢-B ml5°-mt��lei-ieckin: Communist activitihiihas been wiped out bi 1111880�tdecisiona. which in turn bl". agsggneg a nebulous forrrhila to.the smith Act�: oroscrivt�ml.tend pronounced Ophemeral�..ooncept| of pertinenw Which]"will permit a witness to cite

sweesy or Watkins as a reasonX for refusal to answer W1-ii�-�= 1&#39;-N92 net result that nobody will.1 1-�L1; know what he means. Y��he cannot be prosecuted f°l&#39;492�cqntei�pi because �e �i�iii�i�;

th value.� . i. - 925�-%6.r.&#39;.%-92&#39;nold summed til! theyTgygnmfsdiscussion seyins the�question at issue was: "gs there 92e, type of orthodoxy so sneer-�Lus that lt should be euneweoti

92 A"

4� ___; . _A_ V�, ipww .__»_ A_ �~ ~ ~� �;;;

P � - _1

2 I

O

a . I . Ie~92 _. 5_- _ 1. _4: 92 e ~

li�?i%E_�5?L1i"~l_mom 92._--.=~w:u/mi i y;-o

i PIIL

is mm 0&#39;n0&#39;rm1§1.L"&#39; &#39;1-ii=~&#39; &#39; oshingt�n syopt. 11&#39;._Repo1-tfrvm the b*¥"§§"§fr-51°

Potumacl".-. �l - . - &#39; it &#39;l . Politically speakinx, it&#39;s mighty lonesorne down here. The

� &#39; 1 tionin on the site of a onetime n<>orh°921"*§°?§§.-iii lvyuthe n�mdins fl�-11*" �&#39; ���"�°&#39;��� �m�°�3&#39;C

&#39; hi t S atora and

léhhrktretlg�en lave lfitéhrhil� it�on! of town. Some ave tllfen�families, others tool: 11915155»plug good-l00l{lll[ 850!-�?:l_1&#39;l¬5v to

-prob¢ the&#39;l&#39;lIl.l01� &#39;Pl&#39;° F� uni�ii:-onting broken down and 80601111-�rgbe foreign countries. Most of

�-them, however, have 8°"! Mm�to �gure out what ting HI! 5°1,0 get reélected come _ ovember,

1958- _ �- &#39; Y� , &#39;

�*=~§%:ir~�=��i;&#39;.r*":�;:-� no , ll�;:ryo:w::?? rlrom I their benches:This two-year-old �segregation Ile-Z168 orhihei�s is aettins e tithe

otto an e.� - �-"&#39;�� �"&#39;- 7&#39;= One of the N2�?! _1"&#39;°t~h§"ea-me up with the tred:F-!�-�e.:1_d!e-net table "now don�92£�°lI �lll&#39;_&#39;overture to the !&#39;el11I>1&#39;k5.4.&#39;*&#39;-,< &#39;_.. �H you think eurvti�sioaha rested basic racia - TIMin �l.i�-ttle Koch and elsewhere. Vb!don&#39;t 0 look u what�! hi -y u ll; _ P %

ned up in Can _ 111- -&#39; &#39;1 1 .-x�exico!» _V . __ S _.__ ,1� 1 Pr:-a lllnletlt-_ &#39; "inn e&#39;F""&#39;_&#39;.=e&#39;-&#39;1�?-�em?-Vii�; never knew that &#39;.:-h;I;?5l-

segregation in its public In ,l-,_ - " - . - , i - &#39;i� ol£theBrl&#39;�shweel:l n�! _

"éan &#39;ll}:erl:- :3 hz�uifeztmmllbl�ni 9&#39;.-1&#39;lK�=.lPl" �uh Ed�

l

I

FlEi

f.I

.1�

_ � _ _ � __,|:___&#39;__;r_____._&#39;l�_&#39;*_L4..._

,. Y0 �MI I-RP� � !og.&#39;the�eausa of their on

� in oi 1-we -i 3"-F-oi-."�&#39;1~|i.&#39; 3&#39;iii,l��&#39;=�l.&#39;m.&#39;�-ii�.� "&#39; i�&#39;�§"...&#39;P. &#39; . . K , - . I n� one K[,llI;1|- All F t-month battle the -knadian &#39;�?71l&#39;I&#39;ll,I§:l|l>1*===-i"=%�:�.i,�i.;�~.{�=;-ii-.":,..::-."...&#39;!<-:..:" 1&#39;-e :1-F�ll . -&#39; 2-an

"sea. snare ii; is-,.=;.�i&#39;§"ij1=..;&#39;92I92_1;_A� Thekmbhm or uwwblk �Md in .

{ted It:

, 1se&#39;uaessi~iIis&#39;1iii1ra"""�&#39;.!.&#39;!ii"f-""E._:e;"."1&#39;he_,0li_1rr -y lsaiesnir, nah reifiiu Q�.I 1 it

92.&#39;}II=l {QM-"=2"? ell� lllllpeaad to own Canada and&#39;__l _-or-ii nexoi-e tun ioreoears of anym in Q1 an U_92. or the Canadian lnlniatliever, these shores,1+ gifugrei the white invaders Imported ela-re; IronLY uaone*:--;&#39;=-=---1i*-- ~- »-*~--�92 - -&#39; - l-i-Lihaurs Gem-tbeckIn&#39;54he dlela1"" &#39;92 Clnldil" hillliq in Bttawa oigei-lg: thh l3:llIhltiukf:&#39;.th�:°]:lschools in Onta o of the c some Ili.lI00_ Ojlbway Iudiwee bitterly *1-eeenIeo�-ans gr�. Ojibwazs. at e-#5�-~ &#39;1--7:-1»c There are an equal nun: of this Oji w&#39;aj&#39;I:ribg&#39;l11 :15; U1;States. We usually call them Chippewas. All are deeoendanta oi .belie Alronquiu mop which proudly held the huntin �groundsthe Great Lek and-stretched their authority westward from Lei

c Em and Home to Minnesota and Canada&#39;s Manitoba. -&#39; .,.-l Bo here we here er etreege eitnetier.-froin��whia&#39;i we iilearn a lesson. The tribal chieftaina have gone to Ottawa and bluedeclared h tt a _theI refuse to have their segregated Indie aehq92 ";>¢b92&#39;:d lb white children and furthermore don&#39;t want theirehiidi

sent to white schools. Important} the natire Amerieanh In:Wth�if tlttilll�l stick. _--___. , _- y ..&#39;?.-. - -~ _-1., I _t _ ~. - e >_ - A Creel Aimed �of Prime Mlelafer .1; &#39;I - of which brought the iardonie crack from London; dire:92 at Prune Mmtster t most timely for American e1 siderahon in our days of racial headaebea�which reads:-&#39; ~ xv,"-; .-�I_t is indeed strange that -nowadays one should have to go;� far afield as the {larden River reservejn Canada or the Masai 1� Berve_ln _Easl Africa be sure of finding pride of race and the

92 not be 1 2006 idenfi: Harold Macmillan and his internationalist .leagues the cabinet could be prevailed up to go and live Io:periotivvveth the Opbway Indiana in the hope I discovering th

I It will be a hilarious twist for the historians a thousand yehence, if any of na survive a large, economy-sins hydrogen botto chew over the idea that the natives of the North American cwtment were the one submerged group in the most powerful militar

, area which vigorously persisted in its insistence on racial purity� and finally managed to survive. Strike the tepees, yo&bravcs, e-scalp the squsw maul - . &#39; : - -- . . "

The Frenchman Jean Dutourd, in his swell novel, .�&#39;1"be Tauof the Marne," reveals that he loves his Galliorace, his eeun-try, 1traditions, its superb past, but �nally realizes with sad anger thits life blood has been diluted and draiued�the same fear whi

1 im eta the last of the Algonquins to protest adinixture with tpal!el&#39;l¢O;.-� , &#39; - _. - ~ _ ._ ;. y ,=_,_ .

As Ainerican reviewer Revilo Oliver wrote: -. &#39;_",�"_" &#39;, _�This angry and despairing book is born of one clear iznsigl

That world unity and peace are �the visions dreamed by dyinations which have nothing to lose lg.them&#39;. H. -Dutonrd knows,all men who are not cowards know, _ t in the lastanalysis, natiolive and die by blood and steel alone. And knowing this, he has tcourage» to love his country. Amid the shrill gahble ofhomuncwho_ try to substitute words for facts, he sifirms the ancient faithmen who ere spiritually as well as physiologically male: duleerhulnhsvn Ania I�ln nn<l-I-iaI&#39;bau-in-LN� - f &#39; - ,,�- T," &#39; F�-7 &#39;-&#39;---"---" --" r-92&#39; a""""" "-"&#39;1 " - t J * �&#39;*"_�

And then�iis s ring drop oi� acid truth: -- - Pi-9 &#39;�This is a bookuthat wm dismay the egicene little �int-ellectmwho twitter in our State De and laneh the cheeks o�isleek eunuchs who fawn npoa fe e voterswith sweet sothin_aboutihe impossibility o!_ war. If �France can yet 15&#39;:-oduce inen, _whnuhpqnited Stateaif 1&#39;7 - -;-- .3-_;_;-I__q;.:e_¢;~&#39;. J2;~"§_�92. l &#39; �92§- L; �T -I "Q &#39;_ &#39; 751.� * D,- � ",. -= &#39;_ 4. tr r

92 ten-::i::=t:e.-.: temiintaan theii ow; distinctive traciiizioua. Would

&#39;L -- . r I Y - _ @- i �L &#39;- - .&#39; �. &#39; . �"f&#39;w�-~&#39;- - ."-" -.1" &#39; .L � --�--Q--&#39;1 Y" �_" &#39;..- &#39;-�"" iii;i _.&#39;a. -}&#39;__;_._&#39;-.{§_; E_b.&#39;-_1;~.:s_;_�L&#39;_"~ - &#39; � "&#39; e -� b &#39; &#39; �-&#39;

&#39; -&#39; T. F-1:? v �:1 1:

SEP 181957-I ~f¢"/*7*~�é .. .NOT nzconnts

_1410GT 3 1951 .-/I

Mt. M"�.&#39;1r ..

Mr. Parsons be

Capitol Stuff 1921=.n~:%i_3 L 92-

Mr

� 9 l J in s�! %/I §§:§2?;i?K � Mr. Tu »----/ Mr. M _ e ..

-�Z , Nessa ... A

BY JOh1&#39;1 0&#39;DOI&#39;1I1611 Tele. Room_..__.Mr. Hollomnm

��;F5 Daily News, Sept. 18 M��G��*"�go / 9 I

I�! V - bu.� IW °<{92/W� � � Itifaghingtgn, $apa_;_ 17-......¬l.justice§&#39;, as y"ouIve probably

noted, are far away from their becheThis two-year-old segregat-lion-deczof theirs is getting a bit too hot to handle.

However, one of the legal brothers remar�gd, "Ir you think our decisionhas created basic racial turmoil, why donit you look up what&#39;s happened upin Canada?" Well, I did. In the current issue of the British weekly news

letter Candour, we read these illuminating paragraph� which made this

American wince. Under the headline "Red Indians Set Example" came the repo

n The Ojibway Indians of the Garden River reserve in Canada have war} a greatvictory for the cause of their own blood. Ottawa had decreed that &#39;_the

-_.-, I

children of the Indians should be &#39;integrate&#39;d&#39; in the" public schools system

The Ojibway tribe strenuously objected, and_ after an feight�-month battle the

Canadian government has climed down. Indian O1&#39;lild1i62&#39;J8.I�6 13 be brought up. 92 -X - _ ,

Tl.l� /df�;_t. "-

as Indian children_and not as synthetic whites. NOT RECORD.-:0iii OCT 3 195

All of which brought the sardonic crack from London directed at PrimeD

Minister nacmillan;-but most timely for American eonsideration In our days

of racial headaches: "It is indeed strange that nowadays one should he.V6 tc

go as far afield as the Garden River reserve in Canada...to be sure of1|; __ __.s -|_ 4� ing pride 01 race and the determination to maintain their own distincti92

I .

traditions. Would it not be a good idea if Macmillan and his internationali

colleagues in the cabinet could be prevailed upon to go and live for a peric

with the Qjibway Indians in the hope of discovering their secret?"

64 °�3Tf-E 1357 ~?�? at 4 - "

,¢

&#39;5:5�-

. ..._,:__-

&#39;__92;

on-&#39;.._...

Me» - -

-s

Y-�HF? .i&#39; -

7. __ 1!.�A|_ .

!~�t-_¢- t;__&#39; &#39; ?-._

F-1»_ t-9.-1-...1. .--&#39;

.a.u____4-�rs

-up-�" &#39;- I;all :_._.7

&#39;<=&#39;-1~�T 211*-

!~�

5?�!?, ,

- -� i

if Tribunen� I � C N. Y. Journal-I

,.,s,._..__r.-is-.. .a|t-__sn¢_:, -Ii�ullk � _ H� g

0-Ii ROI. I-7-SO]

I EI

._ . 7. . 7 "��&#39;.I"&#39; 7&#39;...__--_n t. é - ~ A -

High Court is Huma*n&#39; ". I &#39;]:l-IE wordoi the U.

_ , _ "law and it never defends its eclsions.1-"�?-Ff - None oi the $L+.it5ee heeever. mede -&#39; N speech to answer mac! the 5nni�EFi"r1o§

5&#39;5;-.._,_ of its recent civil ll rties decisions tho.""~"_ 1,...;._;; :=> _&#39;é;E_92~»_§ J � :.; -:� �; 1

.>-- -&#39; 92 .t � an even a congressional investigation. --

however, yesterday made an inlormal talk�.p oeiore a srnaii group oi ¬_Ii¬1éiiE1iiiC&#39;léi"§ here in Washington, _!r_lU_which helpre-1z " senteti the court has an� extremely human___-h " institution, as well as the permanent key-�

&#39; . stone at American ovemment Justice

i betore_he u_r_as named to the court 12 years ago. - &#39;Incidentally, iustice Burton thinks that only peed will

�come out or the House Judiciary subcommittee l�lV¢Stig8.-tion of the court next_yea.r. &#39;. §. " &#39;-"1 :&#39; -1- 1, .&#39;Most oi! the proposals now belni�mede to limit the Su-

reme Court or retorrn It were re rnat_le&#39; when the U.�-S.onstitution was being drafted 170 ye&#39;ars_a_goj says? Justiceurton. &#39; - - ~92 &#39; "» &#39; �

|u . - 1

their have brought on a torrent ot a&#39;buse&#39;Associate Justice Harold R Burton�

Burton was mayor of Cleveland ant? senator Iron:

0 _p $9 �To on

,,-,.s.¥§=*poonimon-W BelmontHob:

one

TomTrotter

- Neon

Tale. Hoom _.-_-

Hollomon ___.-.

Gondy _.-_.---

u|

.--1.; .Ir--r&#39;*.- �-..h .__*.--.2 .. ..i iByPeterEdsoir

w� ! .&#39; �.&#39;i.- . I ;. __92 ._..

. One propoael is thatthe President be restricted to eicpeylfilengd judges in his $upreme_Court_ nominations. This is.e. to .. at people like .!::st.ce Burton himself, who was i oi?"aw director tho he never sat on the nch, and at Chic�;.iIu3tice_ Earl Warren, California�: ex-governor but never 0.uge.~ -. - - ---Since. there.ore no restrictions in the Constitution on

�whorn_the President may nominate to the Supreme Court,anvlnew restrictions would be unconstitutional in Justice�nun-tons Oplll-10!L &#39; He points out, however, that&#39; the Senatealready has cornpiete" authority to impose or omit unitormstendarzis for -justices when it reiccts or con�rms each

nominat on; - &#39; &#39;- . &#39; - . i

Other groposals are being made to remove Supreme Courtjustices om the bench tor unpopular decisions. This wasalso proposed in 1781. The idea was that Qonvress mightremove justices by joint resolution. This would havebeen_ml.1r_del&#39;, says Justice Burton. �The proposal was voted down,eight states to one.-~ -r. 1- &#39; - &#39; &#39; - &#39; -J�

&#39;Instead,&#39;provision was niade for House oi� Represent Ivesirripeaclimentiot justices, the President and all other F ere]civil officials if convicted by I two thirds vote in the SH , - _ �ne.

, c i . . , _ _ e. ;. -I ; &#39;-= No Supreme Court justice has ever been im*ea-it-� -I _ _ -- -;_ _ Ti� -114?? I&#39;l �-- ._ _ &#39;¢l>:1 �_ .�. &#39; &#39;

Mil"

IU

/ _ 5&#39; /1 I Dnilv Worker

__-_i�» .. .. "T311 ._-1

W V &#39; H �Hush. Post and _._-_-_- _- ~&#39;*"" Times Herald

""&#39; Wash. News _il-Wosh. Stu:

N. Y. Herald

American

N. Y. Mirror

N. Y. Daily News .__._-

J N Y Times" The �WorkerD92 K15�-�RECORD: New Leader

�mggp as 1951 _-. ,_*____r_..... ���ggv-;�q�1es1��-_ � I Q -II" Date " ""

K

r

R

,-,-

&#39;1.�

-s.t.&#39;

_._.

sh» ..&#39;�-�<

�-0.

.¥:92-�_.i§ .

s» 3ni~� r-7"-~1sa-_&#39;: - - "* ~&#39; -

D I. HIV. ii-1-SI!

7l�iLJ__._.m2__ &#39;l&#39;|�._a£-_;&#39;._&#39;Ien ivuuonas

Ways I sfC_an_C]1cckf

; �WASHINGTON, Sept. 18.-Man: people are alkinsit public sentiment desired it. a decision oi the Supreme

5"Prém&#39;¢ Br mm ; v r

e.ftheI_Imt-edétet-e.-I@hei&#39;ever!ed. ". - There are many ways. In the past a Con92stltutionaiment has at times been ionnd necessary. but where theCourt goes beyond it�uneiion and legislate:

orwhenitseisiteellupasatrialcourtandrefuses to hear evidence on both sides-�as happened in the "desegregation" case of1954--then Coll-B&#39;l&#39;ess can takepass a law specifying rules foroilow thereafter. &#39; ,-

In the "desegregation" decision oi� 1954.the upreme Court decided the case primarilynot on questions oi law or interpretation oi�

line Constitution, but on the basis of whatIn deemed psychological or socioloiiesl con-�siderations. Although the� writings of someeociolozists-one oi them a prominent Com.-

&#39;munist sympathlzer�were cited by theSupreme Court. no opportunity was given{tor cross-examination or refutation oi thoseaocloloiists nor for the iintroduction 01� con-trary evidence from other wi

a hand andthe Court to

tnesses. The �

Ethe psychological issues were not raised there. �

{<3

&#39;-*&#39;}�

4..

-.;-&#39;

oi

I Congress can remedy the situa-jtion by ennctinu a law spool!!-�in: that the Supreme Courtjtake into consideragion. �the�evidence on both si es aidisptite. In recent months the

, Supreme Court has been espe-* ieimy solicltous about Com-&#39; munisis and has reversed de-. cisions where the credibility of

some witnesses had been chal-lenged. not in the some casebut in other cases. �That&#39;s gainspretty tar even to help the caseoi� Communists charted withsedition. Certainly, the peopleor the gouth are entitled ati-sash-bra parii¢_aI.ith-£om-

Lawrence�trial court itselr had received no evidence on the sublectL

When the supreme tribunal renders a decision with thearin: all the evidence or when it disregards the lack tevidence in a trial court below. there is bound to be resen1 "_&#39; &#39;_"_ &#39;� " . I

~&#39; i. Qll�i-es Constitution " &#39;

The riiht oi Congressrmulate rules for the Supr

, curt to follow is derived 1 m1.! III oi� the Constitution.

whichsars: -. - .-_ �92_ �In all eases affecting Ambas-

sadors, other public ministersand consuls. and those in which,a state shall be a party. theSullnme Court shall have orlgi-1

, he-1&#39; liiris�cti.-":2. In all theOther cases heiore mentioned,the Supreme Court shall haveaweliate Jurisdiction. both asto law and fact. vqlth such ex.ceptions and under such rem-lstions as the Congress thanm*k??!&#39;*~� &#39;. "T is 1- i&#39; This could be applied so that

Congress would not let the Su-Preme Court have any im-1|-diction whatsoever in the tutmein certain cases and the finaltiecliinni would he rendered bystate courts in each locality.This has happened before in,American_ history. especially invontrovenies in the ne-censtruction era.

Writer recently have argued thatConzress cannot write rules In-}jill! Buweme Court in those;

_ Msome letters received or the

. . I

0

~ m--� &#39;s4;:~ »&#39;~�.»&#39;e�; ; .�,_ *.. ,___,

-7-"-&#39;-1"-"7&#39;?--&#39; s cu-e-Le35$? the Cu � &#39; &#39;itseii� as to Jrhsn

parts aIhell ci�lekl-I .board. the .that the -

dividualsmembers .

l�

an ac-stcause. it ishas exceeded its powerstions should not be censidered_~_"state action.� &#39;It isn&#39;t the state -but the m1nvidu_a_ls �eelln_I&#39;under color 01 law�; who are|ued._ J-_, .. - C -*

Eleventh Amendment >&#39;

At any rate. the EleventhAmendment to the Constitutloit.adopted in I798. specifics-ll! 11.-,serves t_o�- state courts theJurisdiction oi! "suits betweencitizens and a state. It pro-hibits the �exercise oi suchiuriedictiun B7 .111 Federalcourts as sveli as by the Bu-_

"pi-eme Court of the "UnitedBtatet.» - - ".

I1 the Arnerican people, how-;ever. wish to live hact_to the-staterall rishts and Powers-I�taken from them by a Supreme;Court decision--to deal with

-public schools ang edwéigi�ongmatters. a ens onAmendment would be the mosteffective method. Such� an�amendment could declare thati"notwithste.nd1n£&#39; Article Ill,�land the Fifth and FourteenthAmendments or any other Dro-

:*.:"""- "* ""1. §°i�I&#39;.2�.i�ii���e power to can o one

to cpulsllc ;1choe1st;&#39;5idtoregulat:an e. m later eprocesscsepublic education is one 01 thepowers reserved to the sta

~..==:::::*so&#39;onoernlns webs and�means_ oi

{preventing "entorced&#39; associa-Ltien o! citizens azainst. their

will, the foiiioing" rnethoiii willcome more and m;se-mus&#39;pui>-

_ e:9g,iv.r.Herey rvunm; Inc.

j

�_.,.

.4� , -

olaon

Nichol

_ Boar on

Belmontiloh:or n

TummTrotterHaas:

Tele. RoomHoilomdn

Gondy

.|/W

1% *7. C .GT Rcconnrp _

141 SEP 23 1951

.4

-ui_|1_,_,,__,__i___-�u1.-1

�|�v�nsh. Post and .____.__

Times Herold

Wash. News _.._._.__

Wash. Star

Zei-

ii.

if

_.-_.-it

#5�-

e-=&#39;92.

r92-

._ �-

�-3... �i

., R -

!�i�~_TT_ * i1"!" J". $3 &#39;K ,1.-"&#39;1* _.

i

.1.4: _.. ..it-%cg$_ ;

of 1

&#39;r~o_- _

has risenmany cities

LL! 9.1} Rev. I-7-50]

wt 1".�

.�._ . --1

speech.history end

we e-altwitnout

4-Ull

inconsistencice enterle0!

my ofor wouldmiitey venture to recommend

9..

I-Ill

Minnesota endhave-iblned m

i

Buver

Presid_e,nt_l{ the �United Bi-Ital hieby the end and lead them into

Is.c_tm&#39;ies where their. right to ,constitutions! right--is denied thexn!>-&#39;-T". tr

_"�-r labor Proi�ensNor has the� Governor of lnfstste come

witi:&#39;.s|_ieh&#39; e solution for the profalemwhen labor unionism does whet Con-

�éiioi.� U1e

�vederived

unions__£_�to cross. This is st concerted

F" freedom of the press as it

action that deprives. In-I-ny

forbidden to do-abridge� theDress dnder the celor" of luv".and picketln: powers �ere. of

Yet none of the so-calledclosiz�z dow$ oi newspaper plants in

estebltsulqg picket lines which laborere not than-.se!ves perttea w the dis-outs reftise

/A/$1.. /I§??isnow

"- so

Gmmotter

.|

I�-.

, _ _ Q58L� I &#39;

T -I. __-___

P .,�/gt�; _... v V5

faithbroltl

event. .. A

"92&#39;92................ WWall is the sudden in ,&#39; 7.

tree sreci1.iii�?l1i� assembly. �blob�hive been widely� _.;.as runrantiu writ-_ _

In B�ii� &#39;..

order issued in.Nesl1vi_iie,,-lest week--duplicating

previously issueld at Honde,and Clinton, enn.»-:q-.

th

ml! I �boycott� 44 the .W100!� but my Dictetingfvicinity under penalty up-_

without iuri in-01Barents who leer they K

thousands of workers ofIwsteria has zeneso 92

, their demands hive been tn eOvuortunity and risht to wt the use or Pbdgrnl gm» ug

denies 1&#39; Inves tion. &#39; ,and just as effectuallyG011-

Iei Wiether even to di|- -cunt with others.-the mom; Mitheir children to brim-to schools.": Yet. it these citizens were to» �

,L/v"9 /1//929"V

I Where were the exponents o!the doctrines oi� American con~

;:rest had ordered it.-* "Ft

._&#39;stitutions.lis:n when. during therecent strikes st verious �West-.iniho�ee Qtsnts. violence brokeout odd men? workers hadtheir on-s �overturned at the�Isobar! Estes and were other-ftdse bodily prevented fromzhsvins wees: to their iohst§_1*.l,/.- nnrei-.et ix f &#39;I;he,Ce1iromie Federation oi��Labor is stirred up over thelust urged impeachment or� Little Roc.imii;ue.ti0n that it hasPresident Eisenhower or nottaking ioreeill notion 0! $2:has to at the colored chu-lxen into the high school inyttle Rock. But that lune oe-

&#39;tion would hardly hvnry turcefnimeasures to ehsble

_ quest, ia.wf-�gblding white Or0"�! Worklnzm tcenter s

.,When tnez-e&#39;:§ strike._mm:i~ Jeers _nbw- thehave denounced� ins

oi� the National Guard/to

�I8 588118 I8�n-.ed States n92.e."..hei: to es=ortlthe colored children intochools in Arkansas. Director. Eda: Hoover deplore: anyoh suggestion, and �The Wall

treet Jo_u.rna.i� lngplies in anditorial that the pressure torch I move came from the

xta-emista inside the Deput-ent oiAJustloe._ "~ .g>&#39;»:_-v,i__.<. _ .

-_ Pissing �Un Buok_I&#39;inn&#39;Time was when tbeR.te Ben.�

1»!ece.-*..t<.:,&#39; we: eonde -ted hi"e ,so-celled �I|ib£l&#39;n;" ml.vine suglested that book;tten -h1.~&#39;communists. and

unlit s_jnnpnth.lzeru&#39; beoi! �ue shelves of o�j-.

out muted Bteies um-_n-xei

".2: We :*..e~*~�*�.17811. ,7 It

d or mi: awrgm� "me?veatttn-es. , uc eberry-&#39;3&#39; Y�il�f 0!�. . _oI�the world tog

rnini-generations--is I11-&#39;0i!Ded*&#39; -Bot no u . on

New. �fork �City schools bees�?§h==o:,&-4/etneuazurau-&#39;

%n92.b!e m espouse the ~��** &#39;0 .-,oooh: o!_ communism or $1." -advocete ll0dh&#39;|.nes&#39; !h&#39;at:i&#39;s�vot-&#39;the Ovcrthrpw &#39;0! in-v_a-11.�:ment by Ior_oe,"tl:ey&#39;wou1e�oiimmunized from prosecutionWqnrdins to recent decision 9&#39;!thé�u r � --D eme Co That�: theJew er. Andtouch are the 1LYDOc!&#39;1sies at the�WI---&#39; � l L 4 ~Q 1957. N, Y. Herald Tribune--LA: " &#39; � .-I�

, 1 I

924;:.?�.:i~�7§&#39;<f~.z"l./�.�_&#39;NOT asconnezn

ii1UC1T as 1957,

in-III--ii

, .�92 I. .. 4 K..- &#39; -I - -

-. &#39;_-92 ._ � " &#39;. � &#39;-.92&#39;- �I.

~

c#1 »

Wash. Postsiincl ___.._..._Times Herald

Wash. Nevfd i___...._..__Wash.Ne Ye Hgf�la -d--lh-��-�-

Trlbuna -

N. Y. Journal-

American

N. Y. Mirror

N. Y. Daily News i__..

N. Y. Times

Dolly Worker _i___.The Worker &#39;

....- .-.--L.-}�:|,-gw Lwuuui ._1.,_.?.-i-�-

6<.£§$_eg_9_,95,__.? W M

i .1

.- ,l�$" ..!;~

. -..1. r

1

V?!�

».

ii

�h

�92. . . ! . ,5

92&#39;68.il1"I&#39;i� 91957"�5"*e"i�~r5

, ...-j ..-.. ,... . - . . . _ . ._ .,.,,..,;-=<..,-.. " 7 _ . ._._; _h. ,- - . . 1: . ta �. ., .4f2"i92 _ . Q - 92-"&#39;0&#39;1&#39; -..- - - ..-_-

- .. 1 ¢�

...~ . - i .- A ..._"...&#39;"� I... &#39; , � &#39; &#39;_&#39;;:�.".x.--&#39;:&#39;- --_�7 -� -7,; ~* _ &#39; ~* - --&#39;~*-.�- -r I�- . -"" TI ."-"7 " "-V7&#39;Y&#39;°.?5l -.&#39;-~"T.,-ii &#39;95:�? &#39;_&#39;:T"-"&#39;7~&#39;w"l":" - -

., -|-

. _ � 92_§&#39;|"- V , .1 r F�-.-..

,.-,.-. _ "an I_ - t� /

�V; _ . &#39; §&#39;._ .

. E -&#39; �m ~

~i_ Ir

1�.&#39;»...� a,|u.. _

»

.,192."_ &#39; _&#39; 1 _ . &#39;. _ M . &#39; . F&#39;__,._it§ .92 " - ~ &#39; r w _ _�_ Q� 14- 11,1 &#39;

_ It j _ - 86982

i

."._ .&#39;�-. �i-_I: !&#39; -&#39;

F .

.3&#39;

&#39;1

, »t &#39;-.&#39;f

_ -o

- 7. l.�V�

:1» - :

92 &#39; ¢

92 aI

i

n92

|

I

!

� &#39; 1- . .

,._ l _ -<&#39; �-

f .

.&#39;r--

. &#39; - 1

_ &#39;;,.::.§&#39;= w&#39; , &#39; if» .

Q-_q_

t"&#39; g L: .&#39;;

~.

; ~0P 1u

, mt .In I1*

_ �»92* � 1&#39; V 7 &#39; " .l -_&#39;-L "4 1 v

i. I

.. 92�kv<r92�_~;~ i. �F . _/fa/AT,52/Wei i

I

P

1

�miI, �

. ,&#39;-1.:

l 1

1.

0.; -.§"�:1&#39;r,�--5�i . &#39;1" -.�1m=3-=-

-..-�. ."-

l Q&#39;- E�. &#39;l_&#39;t_7-. .rT�f+���"�"�~.-=-N 1- -. _ -1+". . *.&#39;;&#39;� "&#39;"&#39; &#39; .

HE1iDUFiBiiR melee d"""��"&#39;" "M -. ;r - _ 92. .:

P.EFEN$E..0F�UUBT.,5Urg92aLawyerato"SbeakUp&#39; Against �Insulting arid�" - lrreaponaibi&#39;a&#39;Critlol �

y beeiallofiallcuin-i�IhIL. .i ,1�WABHINGTOIN, Sept. I1

1 president or the AmerléaiiAssociation called -�en

-� rimn lawyer: toniglit to§"spe " ~_de!enae of _ Q90". _tn_f-"�"&#39;� S" _...22mmo.£m_1_1;¢. Charles 8. Rhyrie deplored{what lie� called ."lrresponsible&#39;crlticlam" or the oourt aorn or| . &#39; au- &#39;it �downright pe_|:&#39;5onl.l and m-TM,euitlng viii�catlon.� - �

I Bl! of the nine SupremeTl!ill&#39;_&#39;Oourt justices heard Mr. Rhynespeak. He addresaeu the a,n- �huai dinner ot |;he,FCdQI&#39;l.| Bar�Association, a group of present�

9200l-I11

p&#39;i

oe

viticks

Pmu

f

> l.¢.1-lmd Jormer Government at-é_ -

:lOl&#39;l&#39;lQYIq &#39;.f_ -&#39; � ;. .i "There la danger indeed," Mr.Rhyne said, "when the court;is assailed by aenaible and{well-inteni.lone_d citizen: who�have let their disagreementwith indiviiual decision: lead.them into irresponsible crlLi~§�clam of the court ea an inatru-;rnent or government or even�lrlto persona! criticism of lta&#39;_members." " �=

,&#39; Mr. Rhyme applauded �rea- &#39;.soned criticism of judicial led-,slons." Butdie sam that auchlcriticism in recent cues had a�;�all too often been drowned mittby a panicky chorus oi! denunci-&#39;92L|0l&#39;l.," . &#39; ¢ - .; &#39; "These were undoubtedly con-troversial decisions," he aaid,92"But what case in the Supreme! -Courttis not highlwntmwm�mid ighiy impo ril? Thereare no easy cases in the Bu-.preme Court of the Unltedii&#39;-Statel." � ". � - :1 �I

92

92 .

att-wk; ~. "We cannot he mntenl

1! to note the oomtorting Iti:-t.an _l!utitIl�0n which haurriyeq the petu1ano¢.and d

euuand we Roosevelt!-almos

rtai _talit

shield oi �the liberties of thele-��ae indeed it ll�the ba_r

be the ahielq oi.� the dig-I;ll_d honor of the _eourt."

"If the Supreme C�llrt is the

-5|�.

. &#39;3 r

"ln ordll-�pm I &#39;- I

| r. hi

Kr. ..__Ir. Persona.Hr. R &#39;

Mr. Trut�:Mr. Neaae_._I&#39;I&#39;eie. RooIlL._.-Ir. HoilomanHide GI-BIl.I&#39;_

reo{a.Iel&#39;tereon,aJac -&#39;

nlyhaatheatrength and .. ,y&#39;t2 rurvi-re present at-- _�!. " 4 1 - 5" �$1 -

. - -I?

-1- gt�? .

.1�

.__e 2-"&#39;~.

.,_. .4.=.v92.__ ,----, w-� .=

..-a-_ J...r ,-;: 5; V.

-..,_ _.

.-2; &#39;3

1

22 .= -.- Ci*_..§:.-4.�-.01"".-S";l

7

_ _ ..-I..,._�_...--._p-cr

-;- $12 _|,

._ "._.:i",5-; .- --92":�"= 2.-. ._.�

-%-1__ - �Ti

5.� 13;

1.11. _

. .§;F- -a �. _.&#39;_v 1�Y� 4.".1: 1-.-r -

.�__k *1I 7.

iii; Ls�

T times have changed.�liienli-bera of the Supreme l

C6

�a

,__ ...__;»~~,_;� - --r ;_A~1&~.~;*�_~&#39;**1a. »-M ~* - ~

Y qo-1| Ree. 0-1-so!

i "�i

&#39; &#39; Lrwurl; _,

.

Win fr?5

Y Washington, Sept. 23.-L-�Quietly, always� in most re;

A might well be�-asked the simple queatxon: _ . .�Gentlemen; do you think you were intelligent or wise ii your

&#39;54 eegregation decision regarding public ach a�! You reversed a-decisnon by an earlier Supreme ourt. Do you think now you arew1ser_than_it was�! Are you _ - - uWltchllig what&#39;s happening inLittle 92 I "92~- -�

- �It is the duty of Jahe sov-ereign, individual state to edu-

cate its children. That�: the law;&#39;, none of the busineaa of Washing-

to D. C. H &#39;u. " are you worthzea,__=ld% the new in Are lkansas of its children by creating 1

reign of terror-white c_hi.ldren pscreaming through phonee tortheir mothers to come and teke .

>~them homo and Negro childrenslipped in!» wqhoal mew throueh 1

� the aide door�! I1 that�: the way &#39;

l gebra and here is �the way to� �&#39; study our �rst� year Letln, then

The renorter put-e the blame on I

urt. They just forgot theirouth.* F- &#39;- .,

Fro? tghieiumlustice byaraen __ p |own o or mam r, e_ _� . &#39;**. �. _-Eisenhower� l�!emoc&#39;1-etio appoin- _Ch&#39;.&#39;E_J""_"_"_w:""&#39;~&#39;".-f-1;� e, Justice William i Brennan &#39;¥"="""I 1-Iii" �°¢5"to . � � . � " &#39;

y_Jr. the Justices have forgotten one vi &#39; in th &#39; d Iiberationa� on �the admixture of the/races in ublitdlladhaotdlx at G. It is this: not one of them had ever been

arents to go to a mired school. Not one has ever permitted hiachildren to go to a public school with Negroes, end none today per-�m &#39; . . .

"hits. his children to attend private rchoole wl_-neh in recent mo:-_¢,l92__-,&#39;

ere In Washlngtorrhjve been pressured to bow to the political,_ demand for desegregation. This delicate issue hal a�h"eady touehedeensitivelg on the diplomatic question� of acceptance into awanky:cuntml sc _oo1s or the o�aprhag oi the diplomatic temily from Ghana,

92 most de�nitely WestA£ne_an, __ _- .-,_ . ,¢v;_,y =_ j ig- .11. T " &#39; ".�-Z� The Jere; ererre&#39;ee;e===eee;�*%;�¥%?;.."&#39;%

i �92._ _ . - _ ,_ 92 < _ &#39;_92_ Thisii-oblem the goat eapensive prep �and gin� il l hiu Aschools. Protestan hag Catholic. And these are costly. e implo:tan{_Paint gfgiltix�l� illriul �ithi:-E�n�eute Court Jlilt-i668, Senator;" ° ¢ &#39;I921l>P w o eat their reaata in puhilei In of lih El &#39; &#39;.:...::.. .1....:<.....":�:�.i�.1§.&#39;:m1..s�.:*.:&#39;:1§.&#39;%�.>=.:&#39;...&#39;%.;""-M#1! givll-Q1! I-ggirod that it ialda�nitely all Whlll-__&#39;1 .1 ._ ¢-F

eke the out to the mm Wanhlnrton realdent of the Supreme��°92a�» lil��ilh Justice William O_. Brennan and, arriving a jlstii Ambssridor oi Japan and Mme. Asaltai. Did they lend thedlurllterl w the new] desezreeated achoola in the nu or the.EZ&#39;:i*:*:*_SE:*s:3 e.�o»_e no gr» -;;¢°3�~».- 135!urn uuw I-5 HI! nwng Kl Q |�,q&#39;|]|[�§f,_ Q �Iwh�!iT�iE&#39;fZianomandnafor7d El G 0°10 &#39;Q_ourt- 1» .._>*1&#39;:,=.=11.;._u....y..........*~_"__y *&#39;3_n;%h_. or�-F, die ..-�Y

{Q57 3 3y°�$-_ .

&#39;1 .1: 1. §7.JOHN fl &#39;

v/Tol

Belmont

Heb:PurlRoaenTamm --.._i�Trotter ....__.__

NeoeeTeie. Room --.�Holloman .._..&#39;_

Gundy

....£5+V 0"�

. .e �--

I .. - /�- . p_ _ _ up 1 ,,. 7-etrained tone of voice, Chief Justice Earl gnu-en and hie, ___m ______,_____,_,j-_____ M �Qq-l�height hleok-rolled eesocietes on the U. -_= :J!T"&#39;§L&#39;!3 Pnllri ---= e-"id -I - 1 &#39; 1 " -

qt.-&#39;ea&#39;_ Reading r5? Hrnedariiii - ;_, Y_ �$83858? should tit down and write himself a book entitle

�The Eduea on oi Earl Warren and his Associate Justices" of tiSupreme Court.� There must be tragedy in this volume: The tragedlgufrrobably well-meaning men who made auutter rneea of aaociI .:"==.r.~=.: M no �reed -:.d.M- "*1.�*" -M 1-_ve ..en..._ ..or.&#39;n e ..eeree -.=.&#39;..ic.. .mpo=-.. ..e.&#39;-rtr er... .-zone:126315 children of both race: in mo» Rock... . , .- ,&#39; We hope the diltinfulehed nine jurists read care�illythe newreports sent back from ittle, Rock._ Then ii they want to aey ihatf

�llgvthe same Snpeme aurt, and that the results of their new d er_ e lbw they were correct and that now all ia better :Ior

11&#39;. greet wisdom th were correct in reversing� a pevlona dealtr

ted to nt in the �rst row and e res; hia contempt 0! theworthiea who pig_us_ly__de1end_ their de:feipi;,_J_ &#39; ,____,_ B � 1__lignuhiio, reporter asiu onlyone privilege. �That is to �be m

� .l

- �:19! 1

3:» on the child mind, white or ;_black that this la high eeheol al- J�

" r &#39;92 I ,,&#39;.=,7_5&#39;/&#39;5 *

no+&#39;r�ni-iconoee141 OCT 8 1951. .

wlilueli. Po-st andTimes Herald

__,-in__._,.--.-it,-.....__,-up

�.�.?�*.?&#39;*-.&#39;

v <~_ _L._, _

-2*!�-=_-H�$2 1 1.

§

_

1% or 7 N�tdge-i if

� .: A _rA �-�_¢ -g- �� --- -- . &#39;

._ ii� _ . All r. __

-92 V &#39;

; E-B

. r&#39; -.. 1-: .p�._.&#39;__ ;�,, -_,92 2,. -.

.&#39; &#39;92_»�

1 ~~ -�1� &#39; {l _ _

Q QO /

§ ./0:1-1»; 6/ Q5 ,, ,._-~_ / _

92 _ .| --~_ _ .-.1 1-.,_»&#39;

&#39; new direchong I» I;

v &#39; -

-� J.»- 92.

t. - " . &#39; I H - .�_.-;� &#39; &#39; � &#39; - V _ �- &#39;. -. - � _ -&#39;* &#39; "R .1. &#39; � � &#39; &#39; -j ~ �-1 Z &#39;.-&#39;~&#39;, ~ >-

; - o, ,_.~-_-V _ IY 7 »I é �- � � I I�! &#39;92 I

{fiat-ii� -~ ~" " I

&#39; w� _ &#39;1 �K � - H I r l - .. -V � . J . J,__ _,._____wk_ ______i _ _ ,_ __ � �. .4 | > �92 ~--s_.i=._92_____ &#39;;. � "m �_, &#39;

__ 92 ---. �V 7/�_%"""¬} um I..- Q� 92 r- I� jj Pflgei Richard Ll. Strout poi_nf.*sol|l&#39;

iv - ._ -i I g on_by ti�; sup,�-�G court g r@ &#39;r".&#39;°."�°�r *"&#39; i�_"r�"i *&#39;1¢.==t hm �°"�°i&#39; �

="=&#39;:-&#39;=-1--r~&#39;*-11&#39;---&#39;-r"*-;q,._:; --A" &#39;~�-. -- --- Ux0/1

aw suprone c<;u,1;§ o�J _

, -2.-".1:-"

�.5:. H .32;?" ,

.T;_.92 &#39;.fjf�. .1. I

ii

1

2-

5

1 1 175&#39;:;i=7":;¢-

- - --~ _-.-- -__ ..-p---.-_-.....

�l�- �Il- Q no &#39;

76%? 1 1 1&5?

TraveferHera ld�

Globe

American

_&#39;_i_, _Bost0&#39;n"1 Boston

i Boston

T iBostonI Boston Recordi C�nristian Science Monitor X!

Date: 9-26-5&#39;]iFditi<>n= AtlanticAuthor or RICHARD L. srnotrr

5 Editor:

Ij Title: &#39;4 Class. or " : &#39;�"� &#39; -�M5-�

Character: _ M 1&#39;1�?* Page: &#39; *�- &#39;I &#39;5I ---�------&#39;-�-~��-1--1----&#39;-��--1;-I-1----___.�_ ..

nIf&#39;_�0IlE?

Q I�

:nor m=:_cono:o �

&#39; 141 OCT 10 1951!

go-L; -2-7?;-=-¢__=¢ ,. /1

_.n.h_... _- - l -_- �_-¢;~1n�i~;�;~~i|r:-J-- &#39; � _&#39; .�1 >77 re 41 -" -* �W &#39; 7 i "7

92

r

F.

U3Jr .

53"-.7:.

._- 1�-

JF-�w-Z22.�

:4 i-if-"E-�i.. ,.-...:.-

�__- _-rm _~?&#39;*?§T.~.&#39;-

/

|FT

I

_e.._ ,�Y7_->�_!&#39;v

7.».-�_..~. , ,_

. V.

&#39; -_."

=e_.&#39;3:é~-1§_;&#39;,. ._;.&#39;.ll _&#39;-3;, - .1zil - VI .1%-.&#39;_: i �_7 �_��iT�.?.*�&#39;-ff"

&#39;__�i-1&#39;; ;"2 -,_-J,�

�-....e__

.;-i�, -*-4..,-_.-...,.,r .

..�_

-;.;- - -

.- 5 -&#39;~:&#39;-E.-&#39;;

., 3;

2- .33;

-SI

!-

+l

_-_�_-_�i&#39;,"§,,,;l|,,, P1;. 1IF_,f,�IiT:_i�.q1&#39;l-ii =t-a.f�- -. _.-_1_._._._.-.�__&#39;i. i I &#39; &#39; &#39;.&#39; » I -1

r

,__ ., ._ .&#39; &#39; - l 1-. .»; --ll . .-.-.-.�e�~i-<&#39;.~n=w~r&#39;1&#39;=;,=- &#39;._-,1�-&#39;-�Y&#39;i&#39;~�H�I&#39;-�i�~�4�$� &#39;,1?"-5*-&#39;i"33.""5~&#39;.i-"&#39; �ii�?!-" J."-�-.-" -1>. * ." . &#39;. J ""��=--. . I_&#39;- I �- � &#39; --" F.-�,-_-�:-v&#39;§&#39;.§,�*&#39;.&#39;;" .&#39;,_�." i- &#39;- ,, ,.."�..~:&#39;-..

&#39; . .- " - -"1 &#39; "� -.92 _ �» -K-.-&#39; 1 "I-" _* &#39; " &#39; .v� �. -�_ _- , "ii, -..»|.@�,_ e .=;92- .. ,,__,

.1 . _ &#39; .. .1 Wnhlngionan auriusiuis uuuur ur, nu;I UNITED STATES is once again upto its black-robed neck in contro-

versy. This situation is no new thing-and the attacks today are hardly lessviolent than in Franklin Roosevelt dayswhen the "nine old men" were throwingout New Deal social legislation on Mon-day aiternoons. But in those-days the .attack came from the left: today if {Itram the fight. &#39; &#39;

The present commotion is possibl? 111-evitable under the circurnstancea._ Thedecisions roar �o�e good or had. out moorare in the most _passionately_e:not1onal�elds in American domestic lite-�se:re-gation,,subversion, and civil rights�, K

The decisions are so tar-reaching insome cases that it may well be concludedin alter years that the outstandins direc-tion and leadership in domestic policy inWashington at this period came not i_romthe popular President nor the dividedCongress but from the detached tribunal-�tron&#39;i that cool, lofty, marble hearingroom with its wine-red curtains. It hasn deceptive calm about it but .as ChiefJustice Oliver Wendell Holmes once sig-ni�cantly commented--it is the quiet 0!&#39; e center of the whirlwind.

- at the nation was seeing, accordingto e interpretation, was a turn in the etide� hich constantly ebbs and �ows inthe ever-settled contest between therights or the individual and the�sa!etyof the state. &#39; _ �

For a troubled genci&#39;ation��rst_ theworld war, then the cold war then theundeclared Korean War-_-judicial _em-phasis was put on the need for nationalsecurity rather than upon those personalireedoms provided by the First Amend-ment and the rest oi the Bill oi Rights.The Supreme Court is the ancient stabi-lizlng instrument between these twodemocratic goals. - I" , _

It was inevitable, according to thisargument, that after a protracted inter-val in which national exigencies causedthe court to iavor the state as against.the individual the tide should change. Atany rate, in the court&#39;s term just endedthe rn0st_spectacuiar cases dealt oftenwith conspiracy, subversion, and commu-nism and the tenden or the Warrencourt was to reeinphame personal tree-�01118. _ , "&#39; ..r., "&#39;:k.�-~5<,!&#39;92.,....-I�, �,-

. .&#39; ". -92 -. .&#39;.�Y.&#39;-&#39;.�-N iCivil Rights Active ,iT�";~;. --

This was not the only �eld in whichdecisions oi the court cut across.inevl-ti!!!-nnqtions. Cases dealing with�de- "

- ~4_.__&#39;_

none oi them were ,importance oi the o -incl school de-segregation bill. l . &#39; --

The school decision struck the Southwith stunning impact. It came May 11,1954. Every phase oi it was unusual. Itwas handed down by a new chic! justicein his �rst term who had been expectedto be a rnlddle-of-the-road comprpmlscr.

The decision was unanimous withoutoven so much as a separate concurrenceto water down its effect. It reversedwhat had been constitutional law since1896, when the Fuller court invented theSeparate--but-equal formula for schoolsegregation. Finally, it was based on aremarkably direct approach with theintricate pattern of constitutiona.l-analo-gies and precedents pushed aside as �in-conclusive� and the ancient position re-versed, as the Chief Justice seemed toargue, because it was out-oi-date. Or ashe put it, because whatever the -authorsof the 14th Amendment �intended� inany event f&#39;we cannot turn the clockback to 1868." i _ &#39; -� &#39;

�We �concluded that in the held ofpublic education the doctrine oi �sep-arate but equal� has no place.� &#39; -e Elsht associate justices agreed. End ofra. _ ; - _ . - Y.

paramount

Bitter Attacks ,_ A __ l - -° Although recent attacks upon the court

have been based on a wide variety 0!decisions it is doubtful whether theywould have received the attention theyhave but tor the continuing controversyo_ver_ this original decision and the con-tmuios efforts to apply it witl-iintheaqected states. These attacks liavebeenU James I�. Byrnes, toriner AssociateJustice of the Supreme Court l�il-Q2!and Governor -_ of South Carolina�951-55!, voiced this criticism. Writingin the U.S. News dc World Report, pub-lished by David Lawrence, Mr. Byrnes,on May 18. 1956, declared �the SupremeCourt must be curbed.� He pointed gutthat the court had �reversed what hadbeen the law oi the land tor 75 years�in its school desegregation ruling, andwent on to charge that �the court did notinterpret �the Comtituticn=the courtamended it.� Mr. Byrnes then proceededto his more questionable contention thatthe courtwas guilty 01 �usurpation� orstate power. . ~ _ �

"Ordinarily, the court has coil.�-trolled by legal precedents. In t segre-gation opinion, it could cite -legall=1i¢<=¢d¢�t-for its decision. so-allthe nrecedents sustain the doctrine oi�

gre ti n and th is kc 1-tir-"separate but al taciliti �.I{ &#39; &#39;beattleglnoi-bai_hitteer r:.i?:a esllilwle, �£01-lfh -r c1uded:._ - , -- - , , -. day .&#39;. . -. , _- -. ________ ,_,__U§m__ W ,.__L_ ,1 ....�fi .1.-:.-La.l."�?-5"-.-is.-. .

_&#39;

*2_ _ _ __ 7 . .7?

� _

_. .§.5 -1;�. 7-.js--~.&#39;.;�-&#39; "_ . . -&#39;1.-rt."�-"Jr" I�-�.&#39;:? &#39;_ -� &#39;» . -- .

-; �Power&#39;lnto:ricates men. It is nevervoluntarily surrendered. it must be talrcpfrom them. &#39;I&#39;he,Supreme -. Court mustbg c|_|1{b¢d,". _ - .. "-1.�-~�92. - |.&#39; . �--1 .f , . . �.

Congress Urged 7�? �l &#39;_Mr. Byrnes urged that this be done by

action or Congress to limit the appellatejurisdiction oi the tribunal.� &#39; " . � &#39;

.In milder form Mr. Byrner dissentingopinion has iound some journalistic sup-port_1rom respected conseijvative jour-nallsts like columnist David Lawrenceand &#39;A.r�u�aur �oclr oi zthe blew �forkTimes; .On the whole, however, outsideoi the South, the unanimous court deci-&#39;sion has been iound to be well within»theauthority granted under the Consti-tution and elaborated by the precedentsor John Marshall and subsequent jurists.

.A The Unit-ed States Constitution leavesrrliuch play between the three-part gov-e nment-executive, legislative, and ju-dicial. This Joosenesa is generallypraised. It- allows the Constitution to

the challenge of newconditions while in basic purposes re-main in�exible. _ __ -"

There is a popular fallacy that theSupreme Court has an infallible allrule oi constitutional and judicial pi-ccdents against which it applies any givencase producing an inevitable result. Thisis a naive concept in view oi the coin-plexity oi modern conditions; , |- _ t

The Constitution guarantees to indi-viduals all sorts oi� rights, but often these loverlap the borderline oi an economicor social right in another direction. Gov-ernment, itself, is a compromisethe freedom oi the individual and theneed oi the_state. It is the high duty oithe great court to interpret these "con-&#39;�icts in the light oi the time. &#39; i . &#39;.

Almost all oi� the personal �ii-eedolns"must be rede�ned from time to time indebatable and -borderline cases, fromirecdom oi speech to ireedom oi reli-gion. Most commentators regard the vi woi Pica. Fred ncdeu or Yale, thatSupreme Court is primarily 1- politicsrather than judicial instrunient&#39;as� ex-treme and yet the fact that it plays a

grow and meet

role in statesrrianship in its selection of -�dourses cannot be questioned. ¢- &#39;l�his,. then, is the background. for thepresent controversy over the - court..Without the �re lit by the original unani-mous desegregation decision in 1954 the

_heat over 1957 decisions in cubve iveand Communist cases would -have

lieu intense. All these� emotional ei�together have precipitated the court tothe biggest controversy since New

1!

l

Iinlll

l

-.5. -

I

i

e .

-I &#39;. ..-1.

at-&#39;fr:

.,. .

s-. -4.�

1&#39;

t-5.

3;; Itar-

fl

. I _ -&#39;

l - ~&#39;._= " N»

Q. �_ J --t,sf...-.&#39;-l v

»;.&#39;l.&#39;-;-.&#39;-&#39;-:

ti; .-.-so "-�§rcs_=. ..�_" -: F ."�§&#39;¥7.-i&#39;.,

,;¢j=&#39;.: _i.&#39;5. - - -1- .

.&#39;i�.iI-v~--1-1,

&#39;;&#39;-.92"-}+>?"�-

we� &#39;-.

;

1

I� _�__

I - -" - .ASES DEALING. WITH COMMU-C NISM. subversion, and seditiondominated the Supreme Court&#39;s 1957

term and fed the controversy which nowsurrounds it.. .-_ _ . " - -

�As before in its history," writes NewYork University law professor Edmond�Cahn, "the �court is passing through ahostile phase when criticism. becomesstrident enough to seem substantial. andextreme enough to suggest alai-in." = -� &#39;

On June 36, Representative Joseph �W.Martin, Jr., R! of Massachusetts, Houseminority leader, declared over televisionthat recent decisions had "crippled theinvestigating committees" of Congress.-. 7Other critics raised their voices in stormsof unfavorable comment. *- -&#39; - - T é,

ose who liked the -new. direction oi�t court said little. There are signs now,

&#39; wever, that the gale force of criticisms somewhat subsiding. Congress quickly

passed legislation to protect FBI �lesfrom promiscuous publication. Further-more, closer study produced a tranquillizeinge�ect.--,-. -, ~. ; &#39;

What seemed to be happening was thatafter a generation of rulings that tendedto favor the state as against the �citizenin the turbulent world situation, the ma-jority of the high cour_t.vgas_now grow-ing anxious lest individual freedomswere in danger and was bent on shiftingthe balance. � - i &#39; .&#39; &#39;&#39; Five cases typify the new direction. &#39;

1. Jenckecase "_ _|The of secret FBI information ac-

cumulated against a defendant has beena diilicult problem for judges. The courtheld June 3-with the sole dissent of Mr.Associate Justice Clarlr-that the gov-ernment must either dismiss its chargesagainst Clinton E. Jencks, a New Mexicomine union official, or make availableto him. or his lawyer FBI reports aboutwhich government witnesses had giveno l testimony. &#39; _ , ,

The burden �ls the "government&#39;s, theurt ruled not to be shifted to the trial

cove� to decide whether "-- -"�*�-

"preiudice of�-naklilokw-lng the cnmwce �i§&#39;�{§unpunished is greater than that attend-ant upon the possible disclosure of statesecrets and other con�dential informe-tion in the government�: p0ssBS3l0I&#39;|.,- _

This case� broke down barriers thathave longshieided �FBI reports in court

rosecutlons. Congress rushed throughgislation to prevent the alleged da er

f wholesale exposure of FBI �les bu tsctlon still left th_e"Jfncks�,cas§ as a -�Ifcial milestones. ., 15 -..»- r , .-~

__ _____._.._ ;_--.- .. .�.�� ,- �&#39;�1 ���.* J92"&#39;=T"�;15&#39;7 7*", F"-:7� "3 -<1 &#39;--m.r-:_"~- - a 1, - t &#39; &#39; &#39; - �

,&#39;*,esia�-Mskinsics§es&#39; .-it ,- __

Roman holiday for rummagin through. . . vital national secretsff Harv LawSchool dean, Erwin N. Griswold, ow-ever, declared it �simply blueprints o-cedures used in every criminal &#39;co1.=.rt."

|&#39;- . .. I »-.

2. WaikinsCabe &#39;- w"This historic case de�nes and limits

the investigative power of Congress andthrows safeguards to the man investi-gated. It was written by Mr. Chief Jus-tice Warren. The only dissenter was Mr.Justice Clark. The court reversed the�lower court conviction of John �T. Wat-kins, an Illinois labor "leader, for con-tempt when he refused to divulge to theHouse Un-American Activities Commit-tee information regarding past associatessuspected of communism. .

Mr. Watkins had generally cooperatedwith the House committee but chargedthat some of its problngs were vague andirrelevant to legislative requirements.The Warren opinion held that while thepower of Congress to investigate isbroad "it is not unlimited!? and thatthere �is no congressional power to ex-pose for the sake of exposure.�

In the speci�c case the court ruledthat the committee had fallen under the

-"vice of vagueness." The opinion upheldthe authority of Congress to inquireinto and to publicize "corruption, malad-ministration, or inefficiency," but it ruledthat an inquiry must state clearly �to thewitness its purpose and the pertinencyof the questions. i

This decision upheld the rninoi-i� *views in the lower court of HenryEdgerton, Chief Judge of the UnitedStates Court of Appeals for the Districtof Columbia Judicial Circuit. It roused

-some congressional ire by limiting so-called ��shing expeditions." The_ style ofthe liiiarren opinion is unusually broadand sweeping in its criticism of the abuseof the investigatory power, and it hasbrought some criticism on that account.

3. West Coast Communists "�rm..- E_..f4l_ A&#39;_e 4 n_1___92 ,. . t . --im= ionul-n J&#39;92L�l-&#39;�-I I�uerll statute IO

punish conspiracy to teach or advocateoverthrow of the government by force or .violence-�is one of the most controversiallaws enacted in modern times. It ls theonly. sedition law passed by Congresssince the Alien and Sedition Acts 0! JohnAdams� administration. &#39; &#39; � i

&#39; - A divided Supreme Court�:-3, inlD51upheld its constitutionality the original Dennis case,,but now in secondlook the court drastically red neg itand whittled it down. Messrs. ces

~ rm seems hardly� mi-. The aha. by

,_

� Q O

I

,..._ to-..--..._...s__..i ._ W W - rrm r....�lI=;="""&#39;_

gather.-The new Harlan opinion empha-sizes the di�erence between teachingthe overthrow of the govermiient as anabstract idea and of advocating awn tothat end. Mr. Justice Clark filed the -ly-dissent. The court ordered ECQLIHIENlive Communist defendants on 1-heground of �palpably insu�lcient� evi-dence, and sent nine others to a new trialin California. __ _J Y I1am. nweezyuise ~ "- -J _

This dealt with an appeal from 1 stateconviction for contempt in New Hamp-shire where college professor Paul H.Sweezy refused to answer questions re-garding alleged subversive activities. Theinquiry was by a �one-man legislativecommittee" under the state attorneygeneral. �

The United States Supreme� Courtruled that "there was nothing to connectthe questioning� with the �fundamentalinterest or the state." In a concurringopinion ivlessrs. Justices Harlan and

=Frankfurter added that �the right of Icitizen to political privacy� must be bal-anced against the right of the state toself-protection._Mr. Justice Clark dis-sented and was joined by Mr. QsticeBurton. -

5. Cominunist Disquali�catihA series of decisions limited the legal

penalties and, by inference, the socialodiurn for past association with the Com-J,munist Party. The court seemed to bearguing that former Communist mem-bership ls not su�lclently related tomoral character to justify permanentostracism of the individual or his dis-quali�cation from certain o�ices. Thusthe _ court ruled out efforts of NewMexico and California to refuse admis-sion to the bar either because ct pastCommunist _Party membership or be-cause of&#39;Flrst Amendment refusal toanswer questions. i &#39;. iii. � �

These decisions and bthers like themproduced wide controversy. One pointshould be noted. in order to vindicate ageneralized constitutional freedom it wasnecessary for the court in many casesto !ree.a particular individual who held

, unpopular or even wrong-headed views.This brought charges that the court wasbeing__"s_oit� to__alleged subversive: oraciuauy "sympath1zing� with them." "L- -

its function, is not interested in the anas such, but in the precedent. Frombeginning it has reversed convictideemed unconstitutional, however he

tn

~._-.2�.3 . �,. , .. .,

it ». .1-,_ _--192&#39;.&#39;.�, &#39;. 1�. ._.�e-- 2 �ck-_&#39; .-"&#39;"-.�.&#39;:- &#39;or - f92§�it&#39;::?�

_;.-;_

&#39; �:4-�I... »,,_.tfrw =~ �-:.53�.s_ I, -1&#39;.-�-.�

..,--t-o--Iv. �__

1b��92-r.92_ -L -...,4-.&#39; . -_- ..,.92-;..,__-

. :1 -

55i

~,-u-.&#39;.I.. _- .&#39;.&#39; 1&#39;i�..---

H":7

K-Q-.-pr--. -g_.,;._ _.._

. ,:_�.1:-*1-1;.-I.__».!_ � <4

C;-�_j=_1I¢,-&#39;.= -,.-L� 1

-e-"�=-=":.&#39;»&#39;-&#39;&#39;:iZ&#39; ~ .

saris�-.� , _ �-7,, _

1-; -__.

_-. _ .

1&#39; -.-ad;-.

- s-1"

i!

. The term �l&#39;EVO1tJttOn�I&#39;Y&#39;.&#39; has been

r.~m. __ _ I _ _- Q-H... _�-it

fl ,_.._-.-s-..V-.- _.-- IM¥&#39;fI&#39;i¬*&#39;.&#39;!:. -.� . ~ -V.�

iDecisi6fis"*[*. ..�i . --.l I

7 - _. _ ,"~~ --.-... -. --i 1- s -.. ----- , ._|

r--is i::-otnrr lest term, e1 voteof4to2,orderedE I duPimt 2. T d U &#39;on&#39;_�,_.�

court has nearly all centered on decisirelating to communism, security, andcivilrights and it is sometimes forgotten ,

,that it has been simultaneously busywith wide �elds of other intricate .matters, as the du Pont caseindicates. �.

The court dealt with labor arbitrationand picketing; attempted to lay downguiding rules in control of -obscenity,reversed itself on the power ct the inl.li= itary to try civilian dependents abroad |for capital crimes, and applied antitrust

de Nerriours st Co. to divest itself» » 1". ° m . - :of a 23 per cent stockinterest in General E In I Ville?! °5 "5" the &#39;m°�t It Ar�;Motors. Current controversy . over th his Pe1&#39;haP3- W" �&#39;h¢th¢" a °

gives the federal courts the jo of super-vising and enforcing compliance witharbitration clauses in collective bargain-ing agreements. It the act does so. it�iss tail order. As a hwer court put it, it @_authorizes federal courts to fashion Ibody of federal law for the enforcementof those� collective bargaining agree-ments . . . with! speci�c pcrtorm�ncgof promises to arbitrate grievances. - -- The high court ruled that this is whatthe Taft ct required, Mr. Associate Jus-

regulation to professional football- �°° F1""�k1�1&#39;t�" sha&#39;P1Y dissenting� He;though continuing to exclude profes- ""95 P1 3 b��&#39;d°n °� theuederal musionai baseball. . � - �to fashion a whole dy of substanti

Here are some of these cases 18W PD1&#39;°P1&#39;l51§ 1°!� ¢_°mP!-mated

10 P -i -- &#39; .

applied to this opinion. It was writtenby Mr. Associate Justice Brennan withsharp dissent noted by Messrs. Associate-Tuatices Burton and Frankfurter. It

threw out the-rule which the Federal .

Trade Commission has used for over 40

years in administering the Clayton Act.The rule was that the act applied to�horizontal� stock acquisitions, where

company A buys stock in competing .company B! but not to "vertical" acqui- .sitions where company A buys stock in inoncompetitor comlmny C!. i - I

The court ruled June 3 that du Pont�s 11917-1919 acquisition of GM stock gave iit illegal competitive advantage in thesale to GM of du Pont fabrics andpaints. The decision has long-rangesocial and economic implications-as forexample in industry, how big is �big�? �

Without saying so directly, the rathergeneralized Brennan opinion may put alimit on vertical expansion of American �~industrial empires. He argued that Con- �gross did intend to cover vertical acquisi-

ons under the act although the FTC �took a contrary position. - - _* The opinion� has been sharply criti-cized, Amgng others, by the dissentingJud s. The point implicit her iswh er the court is usui-ping the &#39;b of Flo slation. If Congress wants ��t-ittll 92. . . ,

anticism nned, why shoul it saspecl�call? itself? K ~ - 3&#39;

,/�mi,

~�--=- .- ._...?.�_+__L...__..._� -&#39; &#39; .&#39; &#39; "&#39; .1�.-

¢1�ll_Droblems ed by collectivebl gaining. . . ." _ - i ~ -

In another trade union case Mr. Jus-tice Frankfurter wrote �- the majorityopinion. Constitutional free speech pro-visions, he ruled for me court, do notprevent a state from enjoining peacefulpicketing that violates a section of astate �ri_ght-to-work� law: this one_ban-ning umons from trying to coerce anemployer _to i.nterfere&#39;_wit.h his em-ployees� right to join ogdstay out of aunion. Dissenting were essrs. JusticesWarren, Douglas, and Black. &#39; - .

3. �Control of Obscenity .4Drawing a distinction between free

speech and the evils of obscenity haslong bothered the court. This year &#39;itunanimously ruied that Iviichigan can-not make it a crhninal offense to providethe adult public with a book, that.-�isregarded by some as not �t to be readby children. &#39; - L - -

But a majority of the court also up-held a number of other less �generalizedobscenity statutes. It established thisstandard "whether to the� average per-son, applying contemporary� communitystandards, the dominant t eme_of theMaterial taken as a whole, appeals to

U I11 Irurient i.nterest."&#39; , , - . _&#39;

&#39; 1bI:I.e.._... .....i,.&#39;-..: r*:-.:l:rl-...�.*

convictions of two women char with

10. I&#39;ll-Illa�-If, ll�,-�I5 �II. �J-Iv-ll ll. - _In June, 1956, the court u1?4�id -thekilling their husbands �and 1&#39;

1

,.

Ci O

&#39; �*"""� * ee �~ 7.� I , 1..-. .- ,__ ,_. . . .. _ . V. .-

mllltary court trials of -civilians in c -tal otlenses overseas are constitution .In one of the fastest switches in histottl}; court in June this year overrulei lf and held such trials unconstitu-tional. The dissenters of e year ego be-came the majority when Mr. AssociateJustice Harlan changed positions and Mr.Justice Frankfurter, who reserved judg-ment last year, joined them. The decisionis limited to A! capital offenses, B!servicen=ien&#39;s civilian dependents, and C! times of peace. Naturally, such iluickreversals as this bring criticism o thehigh court�: stability. &#39;. .- _ I

5. Professional Football �

Here again the court runs into somecharges of inconsistency for it has justruled professional football is subject toantitrust laws while professional baseballremains free from regulation. In 1922the then Supreme Court held baseballoutside antitrust laws as s. sport, not Ibusiness, in the meaning of Congress.Mr, Associate Justice Clark, writing forthe court, this year frankly recognizedthe difficulty of the position: &#39; &#39;_- .

�If this ruling is unrealistic, inconsis-tent, or illogical, it is sul�cient to an-swer, aside from the distinctions betweenthe businesses, that were we consideringthe question of baseball for �the �rsttime upon a clean slate we would h eno doubts" i.e.,&#39;that baseball shouldcovered by -the Sherman Act!. But, e.

�idea! It "TY .1.-&#39; �P19 9°"!&#39;."�!:..:. - .. A

1

.1rs-l~��~�-_:~~ - -_lu&-;--�- " �:A&#39; ~� *&#39; ~

a0

J " Q &#39; ,

B§_.,

1

1

1:1 E

r

i

i1i

- 0&#39;." . &#39;°&#39; >-.._&#39; -, , , : _ --.1 &#39;. ,. - -m. ~ , _ . l i.5-: ,-wig ;* a---in-we---an 1-1| ~

;&#39; omp osihonv of Coi�l�- _.; _. � . .

I. EISENHOWEL HA! NAMEDM FOUR ot the nine members of thepresent court. Seniority of some 01&#39;

the remaining member?� Justice Frank-furter, 74,- Justice B act, 11, JusticeBurton, 69! makes it likely that thePresident may appoint others. Retiredlustices get a pension of $35,000 a year.

Some believe that President Eisen-hower will have a �r�-eater ultin-fate lin-pact en domestic story through hisappointees to the high court. thanthrough his political and administrativepolicies, . .. ; _ .

The Supreme Court is not a dullchine whose members teed cases into Ikind ot Univac of historic precedents,push a button, and produce a calculableresult. Much depends on the personalitiesof the members themselves in this veryhuman juridical-political body. _

Nobody can deny that the climate orthe court has recently changed. Thisclimate depends in part&#39;on the atmos-phere outside the court the court tol-lows �th� illiction returns� maintainedMr. Dooley! and in part on the liberal-conservative components .among the

New appointments change the balancewithin� the tribunal. Franklin D. Roose-velt&#39;s battle with the court brought �theswitch in time that saved the nine,�engineered by Chiet Justice CharlesEv s Hughes which defeated theRo evelt» court-paclring plan but it

_.__¢__._&#39;,_...-_---n---�--tu

gn &#39; y ended with the appointment 7,the resident of anew court m8J°1&#39;1t &#39;.

Mr, Eisenhower? apliollge�s-lir 8;;�ct us ice� ave a eEgllance, in the tribunaal. It ismtg;-eating to note_that Chief mug 1:15Warren has increasingly 1011115 d Hm,on the side of the two so-calla , A;gfgls,� Justices Black and Douglas.

oufgfgnding feature of the .terrni;]118t �3:12eluded was the number oi tmss 1:.Messrs. Warren. Black» md °�5dissented together. There were ll suchcombjnltjgng, six oi �these they werejoined by Associate J ust_1ce Brennan. Thempg; frequent combinations of dissentinljustice, were 1|-ms; oi! Justices Blackand Douglas, 21 times; and JusticesFrankfurter and Harlan. also Plired 31times.! &#39; ~._ � �, ___. _&#39;__,_1 � -Ma&#39;or Shift Seen "-J ,.

believ thes::.*:.~":;:.�.:-=:»>***z:::.&#39;:::.. .... .

� �I i � vns1z"ne*n_erin�;."i"n}. school desegre-__

�I, tron of sustaining, in the interest ct na-A �

l

1lll""&#39;-» �Bends to emphasize the second. Chic:92~

<

iin

Pi

i.5!I.1.

I Trend Reversed p &#39;3 I- -&#39; .it Now the trend has changed. Courts, 92

congressional committees, and govern- 1mental agencies are rapped for 11-3113-gressing the four freedoms against in-

� dividual rights. An outcry has followed.But it should be remembered that there ihbi!

,__I .

tional security, new.restrictions upon F

Ration case will be debated tor decades,Di I B80913/It Chieb Justice in

inducing his strikingly �indivl-dualisticand articulate associate justices to gpalong with him unanimously on the tre-�gl °l1-I °P1-man is almost unrivaled in

ory. " -

! It should be understood that there is

l�atgiong�:>1t¬|el:;s-igsgrétancient �ts�itllg with-.n eco : weenau ort and-libsmg, between the rights of theystate �-Ind e rights of the individual. -

In such con�icts one group oi� judgesHamill! supports the in-st, another

ustice Fred Vinson generally came�down on the. side of oillcialdorn, Chic! 3Justice Warren along with JusticesDouglas and_B1ack! aptiears to start&#39;Britta a predisposition toward the in-

m ual. ,The court has always held the balance

between these two sets oi rights with oneera emphasizing one, another the sec-Ond. After a security-conscious genera;

1-tion in which state authority was put�iimgsgiibe pendulum has now swung ;

John Lord O&#39;Brien commented some -Lime ago in the .Hars&#39;ard Law_Re~view: JA review pt these decisions oi the

past generation! establishes the discon- icertmg and perhaps startling fact that in Eno case has the court liberalized or ex-, &#39;tended the treedoms guaranteed by the ~ First Amendment to the! Constitution. &#39;&#39;I_�he general trend has been in the direci *

those liberties." &#39; - - �J

age been outcrles against the court ,Dr e r &#39;. I � &#39;ye and new nnpoliiieeraee the &#39;

._._____,___;l*�._*-__,&#39;______f_ � ~_ i

illtirnate in line �

tully in�uences the Olpinion to which it�K �nally bows. Vitriolc attacks oz�the

court might produce dangers worse, it isai*gued._ than those seen in the court�:opinions; no change in our institutions

&#39;]co _ ly &#39; with pu c IQopiruon, while the court itseli pow - &#39;

T

I

I

Johifldf. Harlan, Rhodes Scholar with;a long and successful career New:York. lawyer... triend ot former eve�Y rk Govemor Dewey, Air e

nei 1943 45&#39; brie�y a tederal ap -C &#39; 1late udge in New York. &#39; &#39;

Wi &#39;m J. Brennan, New Jersey�Dem at and only Roman Catholic onthe court, with long experience as lawyer Iand lustice in state courts. _ , ,f

Charles E. Whittaker, Missouri Repub-lican who gave up a lucrative law prec-_tice in 1954 to become district judge torwestern Missouri; for 2_5 years an out-lstanding Midwestern trial lawyer, and�onetime state Bar Association president,

The other �ve members of the court:are �! former Alabama Senator Hug!�A. Black, who, with �! William .Douglas, former head or the Securities.and Exchange Commission! tend. to puttheir predilection for the rights or theindividual ahead oi the rights of thestate; �!&#39; Felix Franiti�urter, formerHarvard law teacher and governmentservant on the court since 1939, who;occupies a_ sort of center position in

ilosophy; and �! Tom C. Clark,1 .mer Truman attorney general; and� Harold H. Burton, iormer law teach-er, %jayor oi Cleveland and Republicansena r from Ohio, who form th "con-servative nucleus" oi the court.

It is in the hands oi these stri glydisparate and individualistic �gures tpresent constitutional decisions rest. Itis a paradox that President Eisenhower,a conservative, has named men who havehelped tip the court balance to the �lib-eral" side, while the four previous up-_pointaes oi� supposedly �left-wing" MP-&#39;Truman-Justices Vinson. Burton, Clark,and Minion--were de�nitely �conserve-.3live.� &#39; &#39; � &#39; &#39;- 7 ,5

Historic incidents abound to show that ;a chief executive does not always know-what legal views he is getting when henames a man to the court.

Mr. Chief Justice Warren came to thecourt tour years ago. Man!� �mllsht hewould be a conservative or at least I.middle-roader. This has not occurred, atleast by one yardstick. This is the yard-sticltb! disscnts. � &#39; &#39; . &#39;. " �

In these the Chief Justice hllbeen r

increasingly! associated with JusticesBlack and ouglas, the "liberal nucleus"

;-- " *&#39; � -¢*____.._T. _. _>

. U

E-Q.

-l&#39;1- u-.

uh� �_." -1.15$1&#39;1-Z

_&#39;-�::;;¢:

t &#39;

1:;-,&#39;.§&#39;.l&#39;-!&#39;. . 4* __ .&#39;1-3"-v?1.-.1,-&#39;-�|.. . .; _--..4-9-"1"...-.1»-..�-_;_,2:-.

, |

.1-2

V:; &#39;5.

&#39;92P&#39;f92»1:n92_.. ;,

":;&#39;=~

r 9&#39;

_ &#39; G

�u

-

I

L

1"" &#39; I =_... _,, ,_k .&#39;~ . , .1 �_.-...- -- ...-_- __ , _____ ______

� nu1

� 1 _ __... "_. . _,,_ _,_,_" . -__.. .- "� ._,&#39; . ""&#39;_-&#39;�T __._. 1.l 1. �_ 2 .-_ ,92 �- - V :=. _ _ ..

1 1

i;E.

- -I ._-.-Q "&#39;1 .r~&#39;-:1-&#39;|�r&#39;. &#39;1

¥::.n-�c é - - 1 &#39; ~ ~ 7,]. &#39;7&#39; "l&#39;_7T=_-&#39; -777"" 7_�3��~�7�:.?�f&#39;_�f.§"_§�� �*&#39;""&#39;1?l 9- Wllmlkel. __,; -,, -RY T&#39;1 I-

.1&#39; �é " J;

I �_ �

.%-1.: a

9 _ bf-.-.24 "¢-.~-92&#39;3. ._ ._"...:F:w&#39;_- -..

.,,F

*1

,1

.&#39;_.,_

I

.-

inA

,_.-?§_a"--:-1.�, .-L#5-&#39;7&#39;...� ":_-,.-_-_-

o.I_ .,__,--,-.., .

._;__Owl!

.| . -92- �L

i:=_�.Z� i - &#39;kl,-5;; "0- ..-

�E7 ;;__&#39;�

Q8

_ instead of has-

_ .._._.. ...- _ � �_e___»~�&#39;-� �~:� "&#39; &#39; _ _ _ ______

-92 9- If� ROI. l-7&#39;5!

K / &#39; 0 Z!../&#39;

I - i Ii� pi l &#39; &#39; -.. l� &#39; &#39; . "_ , -_ , .. �U &#39;_ _92__._-17.,» ~ _ _I� &#39;5: -:&#39;.:-~&#39;.&#39;,"..- �-7 -1-3 ,_�_**l"c, vi�..i--_92s�-,..~1"�l~3-"�-3" . r-tart�-".1 _,&#39;.

&#39;<~�_¥t»" x "1r , .-~. ¢_�&_-- e ;_,--;*�, -z-1.._.

�>

.__.._. 92_.._--_ .. _.._._ .. .. _

i

Tlaesen Dave -~�i.~< y inJ" �""1�?. "N �P. &#39;" ?&#39;v&#39;;.*.--1?" ;,..~...-.. &#39;� -t .&#39; ""92|~._e--__- _&#39; " &#39;,.r- -= -in �P

,&#39;92_&#39;~r,92*-1 ¢- � :1 1.»_f-"31""�.e- �"

q ya �,-�N; $"�_e~92|.x�,§�- Q3 3� -"�_-&#39;.&#39;n g 1 .5- I . _

"H4e

II�:eill�p

"Ka&#39;If� _._:.&#39; .,,_"i ,&#39;._� _V_ .�__f -_._ -I V_1 V-&#39;~._.~| �IN THE costreviggthat la min were -otherwise eeunle!farising over the u r would he rendered helplessCou Re . Wris, -a an b e e a us e their arsumenta,�Fl"�T:as has raised a perti-_nent question,namely,� that

l_11I declsi�nsupon hrlalasubmitted byliiisanta. 91¢eourt hrlefs lt-self, using, attimes, materi-al not sub-mitted l-G it byeither N arty - adopted ll tor abut� aerected &#39;-�uokohki _bf the justice hlrnseit 0&#39;1� ll!

s law clerk who may intro-~aura matter which, sceol-<L4-1:to Pattnsn, is �trnreeogn s__and,_nonauthot_~itative-" . &#39; .

"t-MPats92an_ said concerninga=.- -1 ~ .» ,

T ". .3. Formerly we had everyreason to expect that decl-

woull be controlled by thestandards outlined by the

would become diluted heavilywith estraneoul miscellane-

G�ml various theories ad-

sqthoritiesf __whatever

a Bupreme

o lnion, even thoughJ11» in question he wrltteg bye second-year law stu entwho has not yet cut his eye-

D0 THE justices alwayswho wrote the articles

in the law reviews?- Are

those articles always signed?

backgrounds or the menwho wrote "those articles

slons by "our Supreme Court the justices study �theCnnltitu�onbthe law, thefacts of the case -and by thesound reasoning of the ill!-tiqes. In the past. even�lapse;-eh -..- 2-11 45- a..|�e-ILl-l92!92l_!l&#39;§ �B LEI-I; LII� L92I92l.l I�

�fhsd decided a case wronglywe nevertheless felt that wecould understand that thecourt had a basis in the rec-ord oi the hem-ins_in the,esse.for its decision . . ." &#39;- j-_i._ The dif�culty now ari-seafrom the {act that textbookslaw reviews, propsgandlstiématerial from pressuregroups and all l�rts "oi out-1 Iaide factors enter &#39;_ into theInren-Jenna J92� Q algnlplnn �DAL;Jvasaaihevsa Ila I us-92-apaven L-Ila�man says of this that it the�nourt in preparing its decl-ejons uses material withoutnotifying counsel on bothsides, neltherjlde. has the�opportunity "to meet the as-;guments .0! these theorists-god lobbyists." 2: �L-Eye-|.&#39;.:92i-, 5-F�I. . .. _1.,_..l92-_-no-1-: 1,: If

T0 QUOTE Patmaasp P :5:=&#39;-» ". . . The l_sv_:_revle1w_ Er,lucies tre&#39;ati-lea, and so ions".I�f�pired. _=.In!l&#39; &#39;.�iasem1natcd=:as Itgztlobbylsts command no_ s ,lhs_ye no standing aslegal authorities, and the�lore warrant no consideratiotar:-omens co

deaisnedrto over-. in .twq_ important eases,-the,

lb! l�bbiilstl MP lvard Law Review and the oth-the 511- East, bore no signatures. tlill

I

to determine whether wha&they say I based upon mun

gcholmhtr or -is nr�nasasdazor-I cause?� Reptllen stirs�,Patznan makes the point that

citations, one from the Han:

er frets the Yale Lew -leer-T

uthora of the material baio �nenymotls. _ - .- - -

&#39;1�here_ ll an unneeessarg,element oi surmise widetfould cause a m arrlase elliistloe; - » = . _ 4

-&#39; Lawyers Tending monthspr�iarinl hr efs,&#39;at enormousexpense to their clients, are,suddenly faced hi an artlcl! yin a law journal w ich neitherside may have read or noticedr considered worthwlsi.ie.- 111"�act, for all we know, theustlce, in a summer mood,

may himself have writtenanonymous article whichnew cites as authoritative.is not s safe practice.�

c t. . »�_j�?��:I&#39;l}l%a1I|�%:l&#39;..tu:_ . Y--e;&#39;.- ti . :~ ta. �J1

P

1

6;

1__.1i-�i-;_,,g=__

4

To! f/LE5� &#39;%1odtdmun

Belmontnee: @-Par=o-1: -

HoseaToinmTrotter ._i__

Neale _____Tole. Room _._

Hollomon ..__s_...

Gdndy _i___

NV�

7l§�»/�&#39;.4

Wash. Post and ii* _ -- ** Times Herold

Wash. News .__.___

{Q

conono7 T957,

1 ...- Wash. Star __.._..i__

7�? &#39;�� N. Y. HeroldTribune

N. Y. Journal-______

AmericqnN. Y. Mirror

N. Y. Dally News _..._......