Klein Report Text - SEPTEMBER 2012 - Home - Klein ISD · Humble ISD 91.27 Aldine ISD 108.99 Spring ISD 55.55 Splendora ISD 74.21 Katy ISD 171.91 Tomball ISD 82.88 Houston ISD 300.5

Introduction 1 �Population�and�Survey�Analysts�(PASA)�has�recently�completed�a�Demographic�Update�for�Klein�I.S.D.�by�studying�student�residential�locations,�potential�student�growth�or�decline�for�existing�subdivisions,�future�housing�trends,�and�employment�and�other�economic�factors�affecting�the�District.��PASA�studied�the�expected�long�term�trends�for�the�District,�and�created�a�dataset�to�use�in�planning�for�school�facilities�and�for�other�uses�–�for�the�next�ten�years.��The�findings�of�this�report�are�detailed�in�the�following�document.��

Demographic Study Objectives and Methodology �PASA�projects�student�data�for�a�School�District�by�using�forward�looking�techniques�–�not�by�relying�on�past�rates�of�change,�and�extrapolating�those�rates�forward.��As�a�result,�the�data�that�PASA�generates�is�more�rigorous�and�more�usable�by�school�districts�than�data�created�by�other�entities,�because�PASA�assesses�the�reality�of�development�on�the�ground.��The�steps�in�the�gathering�of�this�data�are�outlined�below�and�organized�by�chapter.��Chapter�1�–��

Introductory�materials�comparing�the�District�to�surrounding�districts�Economic�data�Recent�enrollment�trends��

�PASA�uses�this�data�to�understand�the�competitive�advantage�the�District�has�over�other�nearby�districts�or�schools,�and�also�to�understand�recent�enrollment�trends�by�grade�and�grade�group.��

Chapter�2�–��Planning�Unit�(Census�block�group)�maps�Maps�showing�various�factors�that�affect�long�term�potential�for�residential�development,�including�municipal�boundaries,�water�supply�data,�flood�plain,�and�parks/preserves�Maps�and�spreadsheets�of�projected�housing�occupancies�–�both�single��and�multi�family�–�for�the�10�year�time�frame�Maps�containing�aerial�imagery�and�data�on�parcels,�subdivisions,�and�multi�family�complexes�

�In�order�to�project�student�enrollment�accurately,�PASA�employees�assess�the�10�year�development�potential�for�each�major�parcel�of�land�in�the�District.��Data�is�gathered�for�

Population and Survey Analysts October, 2012: Page 1

every�subdivision,�apartment�complex,�and�mobile�home�park��and�then�aggregated�into�Planning�Units,�with�the�Planning�Units�being�derived�from�the�Census�defined�block�groups�for�the�area.��Projected�housing�occupancies�are�based�on�interviews�with�up�to�50�real�estate�experts,�commercial�brokers,�city�and�county�officials,�and�others,�who�are�familiar�with�development�expected�in�the�area.��

�Chapter�3�–�

Current�ratios�of�students�per�household�for�both�single��and�multi�family�housing�units�Maps�and�spreadsheets�of�this�ratio�data�

�PASA�must�understand�how�many�new�students�each�new�house�will�yield.��The�common�assumption�is�that�each�home�contains�an�average�of�two�students,�but�in�reality,�the�ratios�of�students�enrolled�in�the�District�at�any�given�time�are�much�lower�than�that.�


Maps�of�the�current�student�population,�geo�coded�by�their�home�addresses�Maps�of�past�changes�in�the�student�population,�showing�which�areas�are�increasing�or�declining�in�students�

�Knowing�where�new�homes�(yielding�future�students)�will�be�built�is�only�half�the�picture.��PASA�must�also�understand�where�the�current�students�live�and�where�students�have�redistributed�within�the�District�over�the�past�few�years.��These�maps�illustrate�areas�in�which�existing�homes�are�becoming�more�oriented�to�families�with�school�aged�children�and�where�other�changes�that�are�then�applied�to�the�projections�of�future�student�population.��

�Chapter�5�–��

Three�scenarios�of�Districtwide,�grade�level�growth:��Low�Growth,�Moderate�Growth,�and�High�Growth�Charts�containing�projections�by�Planning�Unit,�based�on�the�Most�Likely�scenario�of�growth�

�PASA�develops�three�scenarios�of�growth,�in�an�attempt�to�“bracket�in”�all�future�growth�patterns.��The�Moderate�or�‘Most�likely”�Scenario�of�Growth�is�used�as�the�basis�of�long�range�planning�in�this�report,�but�the�Low�and�High�Growth�Scenarios�must�also�be�considered�as�feasible�possibilities�when�planning�for�future�facility�utilization.�


Charts�of�current�transfers�by�attendance�zone�Maps�and�charts�detailing�the�projected�student�population�compared�to�the�capacity�of�each�facility�

�PASA�uses�the�data�prepared�in�the�Demographic�Update�to�assess�the�long�term�stability�of�each�existing�attendance�zone,�and�also�projects�specific�“catchment�areas”�where�additional�facilities�might�be�warranted,�and�the�timing�of�these�new�schools.�


Student Growth Trends �The�first�map�shows�the�School�District�as�it�is�located�in�Harris�County,�with�82.47�square�miles.��The�next�maps�show�the�2012�student�enrollment,�based�on��phone�calls�made�to�Houston�area�school�districts�in�the�Fall,�2012.��This�information�will�change�from�the�PEIMS�snapshot�data�that�will�be�submitted�at�the�end�of�October,�but�it�gives�a�representation��of�recent�growth�patterns�in�the�area.��It�shows�large�absolute�increases�of�students�in�Spring�Branch,�Katy,�Cypress�Fairbanks,�Aldine,�Humble,�and�Conroe.��The�highest�percentage�growth,�based�on�these�figures,�occurred�in�Tomball�I.S.D.,�New�Caney�I.S.D.,�Crosby�I.S.D.,�Alvin�I.S.D.,�and�Sheldon�I.S.D.��Five�year�trends�are�also�shown.��The�next�maps�show�official�data�released�by�TEA�representing�the�PEIMS�snapshot�date�in�October�2011.��This�map�shows�the�enrollment�of�Klein�I.S.D.�was�46,002�students,�or�a�change�from�the�previous��year’s�PEIMS�snapshot�of�692�students�(1.5%).��The�Houston�area�Districts�that�grew�at�a�similar�percent�of�growth�this�year�were:��Cypress�Fairbanks�I.S.D.�(1.8%�growth�=�1,863�students)�and�Aldine�I.S.D.�(1.8%�growth�=�1,146�students).��The�next�chart�shows�recent�growth�trends�for�all�districts�larger�than�20,000�students.��Klein’s�growth�rate�for�the�years�2006�to�2011�ranges�between�1.08%�to�6.68%,�and�Klein�I.S.D.�ranks�21st�fastest�growing�District�in�the�State�(of�those�with�more�than�20,000�students�enrolled)�during�this�time�period.��Also�shown�are�5�year�trend�maps,�detailing�both�absolute�and�percent�change�for�the�Houston�area.��Trends�in�Grade�Sizes�that�Affect�Future�Enrollment��The�Fall,�2011�PEIMS�data�shows�that�6.8%�of�the�Klein�I.S.D.�student�population�was�in�Kindergarten�for�the�2011�2012�school�year,�which�is�quite�a�bit�lower�than��the�state�average�of�7.6%.��A�map�showing�this�information�based�on�contact�made�with�each�district�in�the�Fall,�2012�is�also�shown,�and�the�figures�are�similar,�with�approximately�7%�of�the�student�population�in�Kindergarten.��The�2011�PEIMS�figures�rank�Klein�I.S.D.�53rd�in�a�list�of�58�districts�larger�than�20,000�students,�as�it�has�recently�had�one�of�the�lowest�cohorts�in�the�State.��The�next�chart�shows�the�Kindergarten�enrollment�in�the�District,�compared�to�the�births�in�the�District�(adjusted�five�years�forward.)��This�chart�has�shown�a�strong�correlation�between�the�two�sets�of�data,�and�allows,�at�least�in�general�terms,�for�an�approximation�of�future�Kindergarten�enrollment�over�the�next�4�years.��Based�on�birth�data�alone,�a�continued�increase�in�Kindergarten�enrollment�is�likely�to�continue�for�the�next�several�years.��Similarly,�the�1st�grade�population�was�3.8%�smaller�than�the�5th�grade�population,�compared�to�the�statewide�trend�in�which�the�1st�grade�is�3.94%�larger�than�5th�grade.��These�figures�spell�questionable��growth�for�the�District,�with�these�smaller�cohorts�replacing�older,�larger�classes�–�a�sign�that�young�families�have�been�having�continued�difficulty�in�obtaining�mortgages�in�K.I.S.D.��Likewise,�the�distribution�of�younger�students�throughout�the�District�can�have�a�varying�impact�on�enrollment�at�each�Elementary�school.��The�next�chart�illustrates�the�attendance�zones�in�which�the�resident�1st�grade�population�is�larger�than�the�5th�grade�population�(shown�in�green).��Eleven�of�the�elementary�school�attendance�zones�have�smaller�5th�grade�classes�than�1st�grade�


classes,�while�sixteen�of�the�schools�have�larger�5th�grade�classes.�Those�with�larger�1st�grade�classes�will�likely�continue�to�grow�in�the�short�term,�while�those�with�smaller�1st�grade�classes�will�be�more�likely�to�see�aging�and�declining�populations.��An�analysis�of�the�past�decade�of�enrollment�trends�(refer�to�Historical�Growth�Trends�chart)�shows�little�fluctuation�in�the�proportions�in�each�grade�group�from�year�to�year.��Overall,�the�proportion�of�students�in�each�grade�group�has�remained�very�stable�over�the�past�several�years,�ranging�from�between�44%�and�46%�elementary�school�students.��

Socioeconomic Characteristics �Quality�of�Life�Factors:��Many�non�specific�quality�of�life�opinions�held�by�the�public�can�be�studied�empirically�using�two�factors�from�school�district�data.��First,�the�percentage�of�students�who�qualify�for�the�free/reduced�price�lunch�program�is�tightly�correlated�with�median�household�income�and�median�housing�value.��Therefore,�analysis�of�the�free/reduced�lunch�population�offers�an�annually�updated�assessment�of�this�quality�of�life�indicator.��K.I.S.D.�has�41.9%�of�enrolled�students�who�are�eligible�for�the�free/reduced�price�lunch�program,�compared�to�61%�of�all�students�in�Texas�who�participate�in�this�program�for�economically�disadvantaged�families.��This�ranks�Klein�I.S.D.�14th�in�the�State�out�of�all�58�Districts�with�20,000�or�more�students.��Since�the�Fall,�2006,�this�percentage�has�increased,�but�not�as�quickly�as�in�some�of�the�surrounding�Districts.��Statewide,��virtually�all�districts�are�seeing�an�increase�in�this�sector�of�the�student�population.��Another�quality�of�life�indicator�commonly�being�used�is�performance�on�the�state�mandated�TAKS�test.��While�most�Districts�focus�on�small�subsets�of�the�population�and�scores�on�specific�tests,�a�more�global�analysis�provides�a�good�comparison�of�overall�performance�between�districts.��Therefore,�PASA�summarizes�the�percentage�of�students�in�all�grades�who�passed�all�subjects�of�the�TAKS�test�administered�in�Spring�2011.��Statewide,�about�77%�of�all�students�in�Texas�public�schools�passed�all�subjects�of�the�TAKS�test.��Comparatively,�Klein�I.S.D.�has�an�overall�passage�rate�of�81%.��Other�socioeconomic�characteristics�are�summarized�for�the�District�in�the�next�chart,�where�Klein�I.S.D.�is�compared�to�other�nearby�Districts�in�the�area�and�to�the�State�of�Texas.��Median�income�is�of�interest,�in�that�incomes�have�been�generally�declining�in�the�U.S.,�but�many�Texas�school�districts�have�been�able�to�stave�off�this�downturn,�due�to�the�availability�of�good�jobs�and�job�stability.��Klein�median�income�still�far�outpaces�the�state�average,�being�$73,385,�compared�to�$49,392�statewide.��The�K.I.S.D.�population�is�more�educated�(31%�has�a�Bachelor’s�degree�or�higher�compared�to�26%�in�Texas),�and�is�more�oriented�to�school�aged�children�than�the�state�average.�The�median�age�of�the�resident�population�of�Klein�I.S.D.�is�34.4�years,�compared�to�the�median�age�in�Texas�of�33.7�years.��


��Average�Travel��Times:��The�K.I.S.D.�population�spends�more�time�commuting�to�work�each�day�than�the�average�Texan,�an�average�of�29.6�minutes�each�way,�compared�24.8�minutes�across�the�State.��This�puts�Klein�I.S.D.�at�a�slight�disadvantage,�but�shows�a�commitment�by�its�residents�to�live�in�Klein�I.S.D.��

Changes in Ethnicity of Student Population �Maps�detailing�ethnic�trends�between�2006�07�and�2011�12�are�shown�on�the�next�pages.��The�African�American�student�population�has�decreased�slightly�over�the�last�five�years�(15.7%,�declining�to�14%),�and�the�Hispanic�student�population�has�increased�from�29.1%�to�36.6%�during�the�same�time.��The�Asian�student�population�has�remained�steady,�at�8.4%,�while�there�has�been�a�corresponding�decline�in�the�proportion�of�the�student�population�that�is�Anglo�during�the�same�time,�decreasing�from�46.4%�to�37.7%.��Mexican�migration�to�the�U.S.�has�been�at�a�virtual�standstill��in�recent�years.��This�is�due�to�the�weak�U.S.�economy,�improved�border�security,�the�danger�of�the�border’s�organized�crime,�lower�fertility�rates�in�Mexico,�and�an�improved�economic�outlook�in�Mexico.��Nonetheless,�Klein�I.S.D.�was�significantly�affected�by�this�migration�wave�until�the�economic�downturn.�And,�the�end�result�has�been�that�–�in�Texas�and�in�Klein�–�there�are�essentially�two�population�bulges.��One�of�these�is�comprised�of�aging�non�minorities,�and�the�second�is�a�student�aged�minority�population.��But,�while�this�student�growth�was�pronounced,�and�its�impact�will�be�far�reaching�for�the�next�ten�to�twenty�years�in�the�Klein�School�District,�there�is�little�likelihood�for�such�a�high�immigration�explosion�to�return�again.��One�lingering�(twenty�year�and�beyond)�consequence�of�the�high�immigration�is�the�still�high�birth�rates�in�Texas�(although�lower�for�all�ethnic�groups�since�the�economic�downturn).��Texas�has�the�second�highest�birth�rate�in�the�nation�and�more�than�25%�of�these�children�live�in�poverty�(based�on�a�newly�released�Kids�Count�survey).��So,�the�higher�immigration�prior�to�the�downturn�caused�a�jump�in�the�percent�of�disadvantaged�students�within�K.I.S.D.��to�41.93%�from�33.9%�in�2006�07.��

Employment Trends and Housing Demand Impacts �Employment�by�Sector�–�Based�on�2010�Census�Data�and�the�American�Community�Survey��The�2010�decennial�Census�and�the�annual�American�Community�Survey�(a�4%�sample�of�all�adult�Klein�I.S.D.�residents)�together�provide�updated�information�about�residents�of�the��


District,�including�the�economic�sectors�in�which�residents�are�employed.��There�are�113,729�workers,�as�of�the�2011�American�Community�Survey,�within�the�School�District.��Not�surprisingly,�the�largest�employment�sector�represented�in�the�District�is�the�educational�services,�health�care�and�social�assistance�sector�(19.1%�of�the�population).��This�is�followed�by�the�manufacturing�sector�(15.4%),��and�the�professional,�scientific,�and�management,�and�administrative�and�waste�management�services�sector�(10%).��

Effects of Job Recovery and Employment Trends �Local�Employment�Trends�over�the�Past�Year�for�the�Houston�Area��Unemployment�trends�for�the�City�of�Houston�–�as�well�as�for�Harris�County�–�are�outlined�for�the�past�year�and�the�past�six�months�in�this�chapter.��Overall,�both�the�city�and�the�county�have�shown�increases�in�employment�for�both�periods,�with�increases�of�over�3%�in�the�last�year.��Moody’s�Analytics�forecasts�that�Texas’�metro�areas�will�lead�the�recovery�–�and�Texas’�large�metro�areas�have�made�up�for�employment�lost�in�the�early�years�of�this�decade.��Evidence�of�the�employment�gains�in�Houston�suggests�fairly�significant�near�term�gains,�with�the�exception�of�housing�construction.��The�housing�sector�generally�is�improving;�the�employment�stability�in�other�sectors�will�be�a�large�determinant�of�the�rapidity�of�renewed�housing�construction.��During�the�subprime�boom�era,�the�readily�available�loans�drove�the�housing�gains,�and�there�was�not�a�commensurate�number�of�added�jobs�or�additional�population�to�actually�support�this�housing�boom.��In�September,�2012,�the�Greater�Houston�Partnership�emphasized�that�the�10�county�Houston�region�had�2%�of�the�nation’s�population,�but�accounted�for�4.6%�of�the�nation’s�net�jobs�growth�in�the�12�months�ending�in�July,�2012.��But,�the�current�increase�in�housing�starts�is�driven�by�comparable�numbers�of�new�jobs�in�the�Houston�region.��Through�August,�the�Houston�Sugar�Land�Baytown�MSA�gained�83,700�jobs,�or�a�3.2%�increase.��The�total�number�of�jobs�are�now�exceeding�their�peak�in�August,�2008.��In�Klein�I.S.D.�the�construction�generators�are�emanating�predominately�from�the�service�sector,�and�much�of�the�future�land�use�that�was�designated�for�residential�is�converting�to�commercial�uses�–�partially�for�offices�for�medical�and�financial�services.��There�will�be�an�acceleration�of�jobs�in�the�service�sectors�associated�with�the�energy�office�complexes�that�are�evolving�in�The�Woodlands�and�in�Spring�I.S.D.�–�with�Klein�I.S.D.�providing�a�key�residential�location�for�these�added�jobs.��The�relocation�of�~8,000�Houston�area�ExxonMobile�employees�to�their�new�campus�near�Klein�provides�the�chief�employment�impact.��This�includes�some�of�the�current�local�ExxonMobile�employees�from�Baytown,�but�the�majority�of�these�local�jobs�to�be�relocated�will�be�from�the�Aldine�School�District�(Greenspoint�area).��


Housing�relocation�for�these�already�local�employees�will�be�voluntary,�but�there�will�be�an�impact�on�K.I.S.D.’s�student�population�–�of�a�minimum�of��150�added�students�per�year�for�the�coming�three�school�years.��

Private School Enrollment �The�final�chart�in�this�chapter�summarizes�the�survey�of�area�private�schools�conducted�by�PASA�this�year.��Schools�included�in�this�survey�were�both�those�located�within�K.I.S.D.��boundaries,�as�well�as�those�located�near�major�employment�centers�that�could�potentially�enroll�students�living�in�K.I.S.D.��Based�on�these�interviews�with�headmasters�and�enrollment�coordinators�at�each�private�school,�there�are�an�estimated�2,014�students�in�KN�12th�grades�who�live�within�K.I.S.D.�that�attend�these�private�schools.��In�other�words,�approximately�4.11%�of�the�population�attends�private�schools.��This�is�a�small�percent�of�the�total�student�aged�population�within�the�District,�implying�that�the�perception�of�public�schools�in�Klein�I.S.D.�is�very�positive.��Based�on�the�schools’�plans�for�expansion�of�facilities�and�enrollment�goals,�the�private�schools�in�the�area�could�draw�an�additional�617�students�from�the�K.I.S.D.�public�school�system�over�the�next�five�years,�but�due�to�the�expected�growth�in�Klein�I.S.D.,��the�proportion�of�student�population�in�enrolled�in�private�schools�should�only�increase�slightly,�to�4.78%.��Likewise,�if�a�continued�downturn�in�economic�conditions�were�to�occur,�then�this�will�discourage�families�from�financing�private�school�educations.��Thus,�K.I.S.D.�could�receive�some�of�these�projected�2,631�students�into�the�public�school�system.��


Humble ISD91.27Aldine ISD

108.99

Spring ISD55.55

Splendora ISD74.21

Katy ISD171.91

Tomball ISD82.88

Houston ISD300.5

Galena Park ISD33.73

Klein ISD82.47

New Caney ISD86.42

Cypress-Fairbanks ISD187.49

Pasadena ISD60.15

Alief ISD39.26

Spring Branch ISD40.99

Conroe ISD345.68

Sheldon ISD53.56

North Forest ISD31.61

Montgomery ISD232.74

Waller ISD308.22

Magnolia ISD150.04

Grimes County

San Jacinto County

Montgomery County

Waller County

Harris County

Fort Bend County

Klein I.S.D.Square Miles

Highways

Counties

Water Bodies²0 1 2 3 4 5 60.5Miles*Source: Texas Education Agency


DickinsonISD

GooseCreekCISD

48

DaytonISD108

StaffordMSD191

SantaFe ISD

TexasCity ISD

ClevelandISD-75

HumbleISD

1,050AldineISD

1,313

SpringISD

SplendoraISD20

Katy ISD1,840

TomballISD648

Houston ISD-1,041

GalenaPark ISD

257

Klein ISD837

DeerPark ISD

-39

NewCaney ISD

674

LaPorte ISD

22

Coldspring-Oakhurst CISD

Cypress-FairbanksISD

2,007

PearlandISD402

PasadenaISD741

WillisISD

Alief ISD481

SpringBranch ISD

1,061

ConroeISD

1,169

BarbersHill ISD

129

CrosbyISD282

TarkingtonISD

HuffmanISD-2

Friendswood ISD51

SheldonISD307 Channelview

ISD29

NorthForest ISD

-325

ClearCreek ISD

488

MontgomeryISD229

WallerISD79

Magnolia ISD-57

Fort Bend ISD-49

Alvin ISD652Angleton

ISD

Lamar CISD805

��

��

��

��

��

Water BodiesCounties

Absolute Change< -250-249 - 01 - 250251 - 500501 - 1000> 1000

��

�� Absolute Change in School Distr ict Enrol lment

�!"#$!%& ��'��()*�#��#�'�� +


DickinsonISD

GooseCreek CISD

0.2%

DaytonISD

2.2%

StaffordMSD6%

SantaFe ISD

ClevelandISD-2%

HumbleISD

2.9%

ing

AldineISD2%

SpringISD

SplendoraISD

0.6%

Katy ISD2.9%

ShepherdISD

TomballISD

5.8%

Houston ISD-0.5%

GalenaPark ISD

1.2%

KleinISD

1.8%

DeerPark ISD

-0.3%

NewCaney ISD

6.2%

La PorteISD0.3%



1.9%

PearlandISD

2.1%

PasadenaISD

1.4%

Willis ISD

Alief ISD1.1%

SpringBranch ISD

3.1%

ConroeISD

2.2%

BarbersHill ISD

2.9%

CrosbyISD

5.6%

TarkingtonISD

HuffmanISD

-0.1%

FriendswoodISD0.9%

SheldonISD

4.3% ChannelviewISD0.3%

NorthForest ISD

-4.7%

ClearCreek ISD

1.2%

MontgomeryISD

3.3%

WallerISD

1.4%

Magnolia ISD-0.5%

Fort Bend ISD-0.1%

Alvin ISD3.6%Angleton

ISD

Lamar CISD3.2%

NavasotaISD ��

��

��

��

��


Percent Change< 0%0.1% - 0.9%1% - 1.9%2% - 2.7%2.8% - 3.5%> 3.5%

��

�� Percent Change in School Distr ict Enrol lment

�!"#$!%& ��'��()*�#��#�'�� +


DickinsonISD

GooseCreek CISD

1,369

DaytonISD168

StaffordMSD441

SantaFe ISD

TexasCityISD

ClevelandISD96

HumbleISD

4,156AldineISD

5,530

SpringISD

SplendoraISD116

Katy ISD9,852

ShepherdISD

TomballISD

2,385

Houston ISD2,491

GalenaPark ISD

1,004

Klein ISD3,904

DeerPark ISD

447

NewCaney ISD

2,882

La PorteISD-150


13,130

Pearland ISD2,517

PasadenaISD

2,926

WillisISD

Alief ISD708

SpringBranch ISD

2,708

ConroeISD

7,309

BarbersHill ISD

841

CrosbyISD447

TarkingtonISD

HuffmanISD187

Friendswood ISD93

SheldonISD

1,655ChannelviewISD327

NorthForest ISD

-1,756

ClearCreek ISD

3,383

MontgomeryISD

1,087

WallerISD563

Magnolia ISD908

Fort Bend ISD1,408

Alvin ISD3,532Angleton

ISDNeedville

ISD

Lamar CISD4,049

��

��

��

��

��


Absolute Change< -200-199 - 01 - 500501 - 15001501 - 3,000>3,000

��

,��-��.�� Absolute Change in School Distr ict Enrol lment

�!"#$!%& ��'��()*�#��#�'�� +


DickinsonISD

GooseCreek CISD

6.7%

LibertyISD

DaytonISD

3.4%

StaffordMSD15.1%

SantaFe ISD

ClevelandISD

2.7%

HumbleISD

12.6%AldineISD

9.2%

SpringISD

SplendoraISD

3.4%

KatyISD

18.1%

ShepherdISD

TomballISD

25.4%

Houston ISD1.2%

GalenaPark ISD

4.8%

Klein ISD9.1%

Deer Park ISD3.6%

NewCaney ISD

33.2%

La PorteISD-1.9%


13.6%

Pearland ISD14.7%

PasadenaISD

5.8%

WillisISD

Alief ISD1.6%

SpringBranch ISD

8.5%

ConroeISD

15.7%

BarbersHill ISD

22.7%

CrosbyISD

9.2%

TarkingtonISD

HuffmanISD6%

Friendswood ISD1.6%

SheldonISD

28.5%ChannelviewISD3.9%

NorthForest ISD

-21%

ClearCreek ISD

9.3%

MontgomeryISD

17.8%

WallerISD11%

Magnolia ISD8.2%

Fort Bend ISD2.1%

Alvin ISD23%

AngletonISD

Lamar CISD18.4%

��#��/�0��

��

��

1��

��

��

��

��2��

��


Percent Change< 1%2% - 4%5% - 8%9% - 12%13% - 16%> 16%

��

,��-��.�� Percent Change in School Distr ict Enrol lment

�!"#$!%& ��'��()*�#��#�'�� +


La Marque

ISD

2,989

Devers

ISD

178

Dickinson ISD

9,368

Goose

Creek CISD

21,675

Sweeny

ISD

1,943

Hardin

ISD

1,195

Liberty

ISD

2,162

Dayton

ISD

4,956

Stafford

MSD

3,172

Santa

Fe ISD

4,612

Hempstead

ISD

1,503

Hull-

Daisetta

ISD

511

West Hardin

County

CISD

610

Damon ISD

186

Texas

City ISD

5,936

Humble

ISD

36,076

Bay

City ISD

3,769

Big Sandy ISD

520

Boling

ISD

1,046

Aldine

ISD

64,300

Kountze

ISD

1,336

Spring ISD

36,513

Brazos

ISD

856

Splendora

ISD

3,474

Katy ISD

62,414

Van

Vleck ISD

905

Shepherd

ISD

1,933

East

Bernard

ISD

944

Tomball

ISD

11,125

Houston

ISD

203,066

Galena

Park ISD

21,861

Klein ISD

46,002

Deer

Park ISD

12,841

El Campo

ISD

3,509

Sealy

ISD

2,684

New

Caney ISD

10,884

La Porte

ISD

7,768

Coldspring-

Oakhurst CISD

1,671

Wharton

ISD

2,161

Cypress-

Fairbanks ISD

107,960

New Waverly ISD

927

Pearland

ISD

19,205

Pasadena

ISD

52,942

Willis ISD

6,475

Alief ISD

45,410

Spring

Branch ISD

33,687

Conroe

ISD

52,664

Brazosport ISD

12,551

Barbers

Hill ISD

4,420

Crosby ISD

5,049

Cleveland

ISD

3,710

Tarkington

ISD

1,897

Huffman

ISD

3,281

Anahuac

ISD

1,209

Royal

ISD

2,107

Huntsville

ISD

6,276

Friendswood

ISD

5,907

Sheldon

ISD

7,159

Channelview

ISD

8,726

North

Forest ISD

6,938

Richards

ISD

133

Clear

Creek ISD

39,209

Livingston

ISD

4,106

Montgomery

ISD

6,952

Waller

ISD

5,618

Magnolia

ISD

12,016

Anderson-Shiro

CISD

725

Hitchcock

ISD

1,438

Fort Bend

ISD

69,449

Columbia-

Brazoria ISD

2,990

Danbury

ISD

732

Alvin ISD

18,209

Angleton

ISD

6,428

Needville

ISD

2,669

Galveston

ISD

6,427

Lamar

CISD

25,278

Brenham

ISD

4,942

Navasota

ISD

2,985

��

#��/�0��

��

��

1��

34��

��

��

1��

��2��

��

��

To t a l S c h o o l E n r o l l m e n t

�!"#$!%

�� !��"��#$��%�� %�� %�&��

�

CountiesWater Bodies

Enrollment<1,0001,001 - 3,0003,001 - 8,0008,001 - 20,00020,001 - 60,000>60,000


Big Sandy ISD

35

La Marque ISD

14

Devers

ISD

0

Dickinson

ISD

250

Goose

Creek CISD

392

Sweeny

ISD

-24

Hardin

ISD

-50

Liberty

ISD

14

Dayton

ISD

29

Stafford

MSD

-60

Santa Fe

ISD

101

Hempstead

ISD

-32

Hull-Daisetta

ISD

2

West

Hardin

County

CISD

8

Damon

ISD

5

Texas

City ISD

14

Humble

ISD

163

Bay

City ISD

-8

Boling

ISD

30

Aldine ISD

1,146

Spring

ISD

190

Brazos ISD

33

Splendora

ISD

-13

Katy ISD

1,611

Van

Vleck ISD

-46

Shepherd

ISD

8

East

Bernard ISD

-14

Tomball

ISD

456

Houston

ISD

-1,179

Galena Park

ISD

181

Klein ISD

692

Deer

Park ISD

248

El Campo

ISD

-11

Sealy

ISD

42

New

Caney ISD

778

La Porte

ISD

-48

Coldspring-Oakhurst

CISD

17

Wharton

ISD

-12

Cypress-Fairbanks

ISD

1,863

New Waverly ISD

36

Pearland

ISD

436

Pasadena

ISD

724

Willis ISD

33

Alief ISD

-358

Spring

Branch ISD

739

Conroe ISD

1,494

Brazosport ISD

-186

Barbers

Hill ISD

200

Crosby

ISD

-70

Cleveland

ISD

-156

Tarkington

ISD

-12

Huffman

ISD

113

Anahuac

ISD

-21

Royal

ISD

63

Huntsville ISD

-3

Friendswood

ISD

-63

Sheldon

ISD

308

Channelview

ISD

79

North

Forest ISD

-574

Richards

ISD

-18

Clear Creek

ISD

803

Livingston ISD

56

Montgomery

ISD

52

Waller

ISD

167Bellville

ISD

-7

Magnolia

ISD

121

Anderson-Shiro CISD

-13

Hitchcock

ISD

17

Fort Bend

ISD

501

Columbia-Brazoria ISD

-86

Danbury

ISD

-38

Alvin ISD

842

Angleton

ISD

-44

Needville ISD

73

Galveston

ISD

-40

Lamar

CISD

641

Brenham

ISD

53

Navasota ISD

48

��

#��/�0��

��

��

1��

34��

��

��

1��

��2��

��

��

A b s o l u t e C h a n g e i n S c h o o l D i s t r i c t E n r o l l m e n t

�!"#$!%

�� !��"��#$��%�� %�� %�&��

�


School Districts-1,179 - -40-39 - 01 - 2021 - 100101 - 690691 - 2,844


La Marque

ISD

0.5%

Dickinson

ISD

2.7%

Goose Creek

CISD

1.8%

Sweeny ISD

-1.2%

Hardin

ISD

-4%

Liberty

ISD

0.7%

Dayton

ISD

0.6%

Stafford

MSD

-1.9%

Santa

Fe ISD

2.2%

Hempstead

ISD

-2.1%

Hull-

Daisetta

ISD

0.4%

West Hardin

County CISD

1.3%

Damon ISD

2.8%

Texas

City ISD

0.2%

Humble

ISD

0.5%

Bay City

ISD

-0.2%

Boling

ISD

3%

Aldine

ISD

1.8%

Spring

ISD

0.5%

Brazos

ISD

4%

Splendora

ISD

-0.4%

Katy ISD

2.6%

Van

Vleck ISD

-4.8%

Shepherd

ISD

0.4%

East

Bernard

ISD

-1.5%

Tomball

ISD

4.3%

Houston

ISD

-0.6%

Galena

Park

ISD

0.8%

Klein ISD

1.5%

Deer Park ISD

2%

El Campo

ISD

-0.3%

Sealy

ISD

1.6%

New

Caney ISD

7.7%

La Porte

ISD

-0.6%


1%

Wharton

ISD

-0.6%

Cypress-

Fairbanks ISD

1.8%

Pearland

ISD

2.3%

Pasadena

ISD

1.4%

Willis

ISD

0.5%

Alief ISD

-0.8%

Spring

Branch ISD

2.2%

Conroe

ISD

2.9%

Brazosport ISD

-1.5%

Barbers

Hill ISD

4.7%

Crosby ISD

-1.4%

Cleveland

ISD

-4%

Tarkington

ISD

-0.6%

Huffman

ISD

3.6%

Anahuac

ISD

-1.7%

Royal

ISD

3.1%

Friendswood

ISD

-1.1%

Sheldon

ISD

4.5%

Channelview

ISD

0.9%

North

Forest ISD

-7.6%

Richards

ISD

-11.9%

Clear

Creek

ISD

2.1%

Montgomery

ISD

0.8%

Waller

ISD

3.1%

Magnolia ISD

1%

Anderson-

Shiro CISD

-1.8%

Hitchcock

ISD

1.2%

Fort Bend

ISD

0.7%

Columbia-

Brazoria ISD

-2.8%

Danbury

ISD

-4.9%

Alvin ISD

4.8%

Angleton

ISD

-0.7%

Needville

ISD

2.8%

Galveston

ISD

-0.6%

Lamar

CISD

2.6%

Navasota

ISD

1.6%

��

#��/�0��

��

1��

��

��

1��

��2��

��

��

Pe r c e n t C h a n g e i n S c h o o l D i s t r i c t E n r o l l m e n t

�� !��"��#$��%�� %�� %�&��

�


School Districts<-1.0%-0.9% - 0.0%0.1% - 1.0%1.1% - 2.5%2.6% - 4.0%>4.1%

�!"#$!%


Five

�Yea

r�Enrollm

ent�T

rend

s�by

�District:��F

all,�20

06�to

�Fall,�20

11All�Districts�w

ith�>2

0,00

0�St

uden

ts(Sorted�by

�1�Y

ear�%

�Cha

nge��201

0�11

�to�201

1�12

)

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

5-Ye

ar%

Cha

nge

(200

6-20

11)

2011

/ 20

1020

10 /

2009

2009

/ 20

0820

08 /

2007

2006

/ 20

0720

05 /

2006

2004

/ 20

0520

03 /

2004

1FR

ISC

O IS

D40

,123

37,2

7933

,973

30,7

9727

,418

23,7

7768

.75%

7.63

%9.

73%

10.3

1%12

.32%

15.3

1%19

.60%

22.8

0%20

.72%

2M

IDLA

ND

ISD

22,6

2821

,736

21,3

7421

,466

21,0

5620

,922

8.15

%4.

10%

1.69

%-0

.43%

1.95

%0.

64%

1.02

%-0

.02%

-0.9

8%3

LEA

ND

ER IS

D33

,309

32,1

5230

,454

28,5

0726

,551

24,3

3336

.89%

3.60

%5.

58%

6.83

%7.

37%

9.12

%10

.22%

10.6

9%9.

58%

4D

ENTO

N IS

D24

,845

23,9

9422

,825

22,1

8920

,892

19,7

2225

.98%

3.55

%5.

12%

2.87

%6.

21%

5.93

%7.

45%

8.40

%6.

15%

5C

ON

RO

E IS

D52

,664

51,1

7049

,629

47,9

9646

,524

44,4

6018

.45%

2.92

%3.

11%

3.40

%3.

16%

4.64

%4.

33%

5.39

%3.

02%

6R

ICH

AR

DSO

N IS

D37

,044

36,0

7034

,843

34,4

0734

,180

34,0

428.

82%

2.70

%3.

52%

1.27

%0.

66%

0.41

%-3

.14%

2.95

%-1

.15%

7K

ATY

ISD

62,4

1460

,803

59,0

7856

,862

54,4

0251

,201

21.9

0%2.

65%

2.92

%3.

90%

4.52

%6.

25%

6.12

%8.

07%

6.01

%8

NO

RTH

SID

E IS

D98

,110

95,5

8192

,335

89,0

0086

,260

82,5

8718

.80%

2.65

%3.

52%

3.75

%3.

18%

4.45

%4.

92%

5.44

%3.

97%

9LA

MA

R C

ON

SOLI

DA

TED

ISD

25,2

7824

,637

23,8

6422

,958

21,9

3620

,708

22.0

7%2.

60%

3.24

%3.

95%

4.66

%5.

93%

5.32

%5.

86%

3.97

%10

SOC

OR

RO

ISD

43,6

7242

,569

41,3

5739

,771

38,8

7838

,357

13.8

6%2.

59%

2.93

%3.

99%

2.30

%1.

36%

4.11

%7.

22%

6.58

%11

HU

RST

-EU

LESS

-BED

FOR

D IS

D21

,570

21,0

4620

,762

20,5

6520

,392

20,2

386.

58%

2.49

%1.

37%

0.96

%0.

85%

0.76

%1.

30%

2.75

%-0

.43%

12SP

RIN

G B

RA

NC

H IS

D33

,687

32,9

4832

,502

32,4

0932

,040

32,1

604.

75%

2.24

%1.

37%

0.29

%1.

15%

-0.3

7%-1

.65%

1.11

%-2

.01%

13JU

DSO

N IS

D22

,503

22,0

4021

,750

21,3

0120

,634

20,2

6311

.05%

2.10

%1.

33%

2.11

%3.

23%

1.83

%5.

26%

6.00

%1.

00%

14C

LEA

R C

REE

K IS

D39

,209

38,4

0637

,611

37,1

9436

,314

35,5

2810

.36%

2.09

%2.

11%

1.12

%2.

42%

2.21

%0.

84%

4.81

%2.

46%

15K

ILLE

EN IS

D40

,998

40,2

3139

,603

38,5

5038

,229

36,6

5111

.86%

1.91

%1.

59%

2.73

%0.

84%

4.31

%5.

98%

3.82

%2.

23%

16G

OO

SE C

REE

K C

ISD

21,6

7521

,283

20,9

5420

,698

20,3

5420

,293

6.81

%1.

84%

1.57

%1.

24%

1.69

%0.

30%

0.39

%3.

83%

1.15

%17

ALD

INE

ISD

64,3

0063

,154

62,7

9261

,526

60,0

8358

,831

9.30

%1.

81%

0.58

%2.

06%

2.40

%2.

13%

1.27

%3.

05%

0.15

%18

FOR

T W

OR

TH IS

D83

,109

81,6

5180

,209

79,2

8578

,857

79,4

574.

60%

1.79

%1.

80%

1.17

%0.

54%

-0.7

6%-1

.09%

0.71

%-0

.70%

19C

YPR

ESS-

FAIR

BA

NK

S IS

D10

7,96

010

6,09

710

4,23

110

0,68

596

,837

92,1

3517

.18%

1.76

%1.

79%

3.52

%3.

97%

5.10

%6.

82%

8.75

%5.

93%

20IR

VIN

G IS

D34

,770

34,2

4333

,679

33,1

3132

,746

32,9

515.

52%

1.54

%1.

67%

1.65

%1.

18%

-0.6

2%0.

84%

2.38

%2.

14%

21K

LEIN

ISD

46,0

0245

,310

44,8

2443

,738

42,9

3541

,612

10.5

5%1.

53%

1.08

%2.

48%

1.87

%3.

18%

5.53

%6.

68%

3.95

%22

ECTO

R C

OU

NTY

ISD

28,5

3328

,126

27,4

3527

,443

26,6

8026

,472

7.79

%1.

45%

2.52

%-0

.03%

2.86

%0.

79%

1.58

%-0

.23%

0.11

%23

MES

QU

ITE

ISD

38,2

8737

,747

37,2

7237

,030

36,6

4036

,002

6.35

%1.

43%

1.27

%0.

65%

1.06

%1.

77%

1.09

%2.

30%

1.17

%24

PASA

DEN

A IS

D52

,942

52,2

1852

,303

51,5

7850

,757

49,8

516.

20%

1.39

%-0

.16%

1.41

%1.

62%

1.82

%1.

27%

3.77

%2.

81%

25PF

LUG

ERVI

LLE

ISD

23,0

7022

,763

22,0

6021

,719

20,8

0719

,811

16.4

5%1.

35%

3.19

%1.

57%

4.38

%5.

03%

5.60

%6.

65%

6.02

%26

MC

KIN

NEY

ISD

24,7

3324

,422

23,9

3323

,401

22,4

2621

,289

16.1

8%1.

27%

2.04

%2.

27%

4.35

%5.

34%

7.83

%9.

40%

8.31

%27

NO

RTH

EA

ST IS

D67

,439

66,6

0465

,498

63,4

5262

,181

61,2

5510

.10%

1.25

%1.

69%

3.22

%2.

04%

1.51

%2.

40%

3.85

%2.

31%

28K

ELLE

R IS

D33

,130

32,7

4631

,569

30,2

9929

,458

27,9

0518

.72%

1.17

%3.

73%

4.19

%2.

85%

5.57

%7.

85%

8.91

%8.

96%

29C

AR

RO

LLTO

N-F

AR

MER

S B

RA

NC

H IS

D26

,423

26,1

5925

,920

26,2

5726

,397

26,2

520.

65%

1.01

%0.

92%

-1.2

8%-0

.53%

0.55

%0.

08%

1.43

%0.

87%

30M

AN

SFIE

LD IS

D32

,564

32,2

5131

,662

30,7

5929

,696

28,0

1516

.24%

0.97

%1.

86%

2.94

%3.

58%

6.00

%8.

95%

11.4

7%9.

54%

31A

UST

IN IS

D86

,528

85,6

9784

,676

83,4

8382

,564

82,1

405.

34%

0.97

%1.

21%

1.43

%1.

11%

0.52

%1.

21%

1.51

%1.

19%

32A

MA

RIL

LO IS

D32

,995

32,6

8231

,890

31,0

0530

,560

30,3

948.

56%

0.96

%2.

48%

2.85

%1.

46%

0.55

%1.

11%

0.60

%1.

20%

33LE

WIS

VILL

E IS

D51

,920

51,4

8450

,840

50,2

1649

,636

49,0

605.

83%

0.85

%1.

27%

1.24

%1.

17%

1.17

%3.

29%

4.33

%3.

41%

34G

ALE

NA

PA

RK

ISD

21,8

6121

,680

21,5

3621

,350

21,1

1421

,275

2.75

%0.

83%

0.67

%0.

87%

1.12

%-0

.76%

0.02

%2.

24%

1.72

%35

FOR

T B

END

ISD

69,4

4968

,948

69,3

7468

,708

67,9

9267

,014

3.63

%0.

73%

-0.6

1%0.

97%

1.05

%1.

46%

1.38

%5.

17%

2.62

%36

UN

ITED

ISD

42,1

7941

,876

40,8

8540

,080

39,0

0937

,807

11.5

6%0.

72%

2.42

%2.

01%

2.75

%3.

18%

5.91

%5.

13%

5.25

%37

BIR

DVI

LLE

ISD

23,7

1123

,545

22,8

9722

,576

22,0

6322

,541

5.19

%0.

71%

2.83

%1.

42%

2.33

%-2

.12%

0.14

%0.

79%

-0.7

7%38

CO

RPU

S C

HR

ISTI

ISD

38,6

7838

,409

38,1

9638

,474

38,6

9338

,930

-0.6

5%0.

70%

0.56

%-0

.72%

-0.5

7%-0

.61%

-0.7

2%0.

06%

-0.3

1%39

RO

UN

D R

OC

K IS

D45

,034

44,7

7643

,008

41,7

3340

,493

39,2

1114

.85%

0.58

%4.

11%

3.06

%3.

06%

3.27

%3.

60%

3.27

%3.

08%

40ED

INB

UR

G C

ISD

33,4

1233

,223

32,0

1130

,749

29,8

5828

,772

16.1

3%0.

57%

3.79

%4.

10%

2.98

%3.

77%

4.92

%3.

47%

4.46

%41

GA

RLA

ND

ISD

58,1

5157

,833

57,8

6157

,510

57,1

6956

,955

2.10

%0.

55%

-0.0

5%0.

61%

0.60

%0.

38%

-0.8

2%2.

11%

2.04

%42

SPR

ING

ISD

36,5

1336

,323

35,3

5033

,980

33,2

4932

,255

13.2

0%0.

52%

2.75

%4.

03%

2.20

%3.

08%

2.76

%10

.44%

6.18

%43

HU

MB

LE IS

D36

,076

35,9

1334

,923

33,8

8332

,970

31,3

2715

.16%

0.45

%2.

83%

3.07

%2.

77%

5.24

%5.

46%

5.49

%4.

26%

Ran

k

Perc

ent C

hang

eEn

rollm

ent

Popu

lation

�Surve

y�Ana

lysts

PEIM

S�Sn

apsh

ot�Octob

er�201

1


Five

�Yea

r�Enrollm

ent�T

rend

s�by

�District:��F

all,�20

06�to

�Fall,�20

11All�Districts�w

ith�>2

0,00

0�St

uden

ts(Sorted�by

�1�Y

ear�%

�Cha

nge��201

0�11

�to�201

1�12

)

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

5-Ye

ar%

Cha

nge

(200

6-20

11)

2011

/ 20

1020

10 /

2009

2009

/ 20

0820

08 /

2007

2006

/ 20

0720

05 /

2006

2004

/ 20

0520

03 /

2004

Ran

k

Perc

ent C

hang

eEn

rollm

ent

44LA

JO

YA IS

D28

,965

28,8

4628

,004

27,0

5526

,109

25,1

3015

.26%

0.41

%3.

01%

3.51

%3.

62%

3.90

%4.

01%

5.01

%5.

71%

45PH

AR

R-S

AN

JU

AN

-ALA

MO

ISD

31,6

3431

,508

31,3

2930

,618

29,9

9928

,868

9.58

%0.

40%

0.57

%2.

32%

2.06

%3.

92%

2.78

%2.

74%

3.19

%46

AR

LIN

GTO

N IS

D64

,703

64,4

8463

,487

63,0

4562

,863

63,0

822.

57%

0.34

%1.

57%

0.70

%0.

29%

-0.3

5%-0

.50%

1.81

%-0

.30%

47LA

RED

O IS

D24

,788

24,7

0624

,707

24,9

6325

,148

24,8

85-0

.39%

0.33

%0.

00%

-1.0

3%-0

.74%

1.06

%-0

.28%

0.52

%-0

.08%

48D

ALL

AS

ISD

157,

575

157,

162

157,

111

157,

352

157,

804

159,

144

-0.9

9%0.

26%

0.03

%-0

.15%

-0.2

9%-0

.84%

-1.3

0%2.

04%

-1.5

9%49

GR

AN

D P

RA

IRIE

ISD

26,6

0726

,541

26,3

9525

,996

25,3

1724

,616

8.09

%0.

25%

0.55

%1.

53%

2.68

%2.

85%

2.88

%4.

67%

3.29

%50

PLA

NO

ISD

55,6

5955

,568

54,9

3954

,203

53,6

8352

,997

5.02

%0.

16%

1.14

%1.

36%

0.97

%1.

29%

-0.4

5%1.

59%

1.04

%51

EL P

ASO

ISD

64,2

1464

,330

63,3

7862

,322

62,1

2362

,857

2.16

%-0

.18%

1.50

%1.

69%

0.32

%-1

.17%

-1.5

0%0.

94%

0.03

%52

LUB

BO

CK

ISD

28,7

9028

,905

28,6

8028

,970

28,6

0128

,696

0.33

%-0

.40%

0.78

%-1

.00%

1.29

%-0

.33%

-0.5

1%0.

36%

-0.9

6%53

BR

OW

NSV

ILLE

ISD

49,6

5549

,879

49,1

2148

,587

48,8

3748

,334

2.73

%-0

.45%

1.54

%1.

10%

-0.5

1%1.

04%

0.15

%3.

02%

2.01

%54

HO

UST

ON

ISD

203,

066

204,

245

202,

773

200,

225

199,

534

202,

936

0.06

%-0

.58%

0.73

%1.

27%

0.35

%-1

.68%

-3.5

0%0.

64%

-1.2

1%55

ALI

EF IS

D45

,410

45,7

6845

,553

45,2

3045

,183

45,6

96-0

.63%

-0.7

8%0.

47%

0.71

%0.

10%

-1.1

2%-3

.99%

4.44

%0.

50%

56YS

LETA

ISD

44,3

7644

,746

44,6

2044

,592

45,0

4945

,242

-1.9

1%-0

.83%

0.28

%0.

06%

-1.0

1%-0

.43%

-1.8

9%-0

.50%

-0.6

8%57

SAN

AN

TON

IO IS

D54

,394

55,1

1655

,327

54,6

9654

,779

55,4

06-1

.83%

-1.3

1%-0

.38%

1.15

%-0

.15%

-1.1

3%-1

.80%

-0.3

8%-0

.48%

58M

CA

LLEN

ISD

25,2

5225

,622

25,1

7225

,047

24,9

7324

,570

2.78

%-1

.44%

1.79

%0.

50%

0.30

%1.

64%

0.55

%1.

20%

2.78

%St

atew

ide

Tota

l2,

764,

586

2,73

5,25

12,

690,

344

2,64

1,62

12,

597,

932

2,55

7,22

08.

11%

1.07

%1.

67%

1.84

%1.

68%

1.59

%1.

47%

3.40

%1.

77%

Popu

lation

�Surve

y�Ana

lysts

PEIM

S�Sn

apsh

ot�Octob

er�201

1


La Marque

ISD

-740

Devers

ISD

37

Dickinson ISD

1,580

Goose

Creek CISD

1,382

Sweeny

ISD

-115

Hardin

ISD

-64

Liberty

ISD

-123

Dayton

ISD

-11

Stafford

MSD

141

Santa Fe

ISD

40

Hempstead

ISD

105

Hull-

Daisetta

ISD

-63

West

Hardin

County CISD

-5

Damon

ISD

32

Texas

City ISD

97

Humble

ISD

4,749

Bay

City ISD

-232

Big Sandy ISD

16

Boling

ISD

71

Aldine

ISD

5,469

Spring ISD

4,258

Brazos ISD

27

Splendora

ISD

109

Katy ISD

11,213

Van

Vleck ISD

-38

Shepherd ISD

91

East

Bernard

ISD

23

Tomball

ISD

2,001

Houston

ISD

130

Galena

Park ISD

586

Klein ISD

4,390

Deer

Park ISD

420

El Campo

ISD

105

Sealy

ISD

89

New

Caney ISD

2,522

La Porte

ISD

-43

Coldspring-

Oakhurst CISD

-17

Wharton

ISD

-198

Cypress-

Fairbanks ISD

15,825

New Waverly ISD

75

Pearland

ISD

2,961

Pasadena

ISD

3,091

Willis

ISD

809

Alief ISD

-286

Spring

Branch ISD

1,527

Conroe ISD

8,204

Brazosport ISD

-624

Barbers

Hill

ISD

871

Crosby

ISD

334

Cleveland

ISD

232

Tarkington

ISD

-77

Huffman

ISD

210

Anahuac

ISD

-224

Royal ISD

200

Huntsville

ISD

23

Friendswood

ISD

75

Sheldon

ISD

1,490

Channelview

ISD

416

North

Forest ISD

-2,019

Richards ISD

0

Clear

Creek ISD

3,681

Livingston ISD

-5

Montgomery

ISD

1,202

Waller

ISD

547

Magnolia

ISD

1,485

Anderson-Shiro

CISD

113

Hitchcock

ISD

310

Fort Bend

ISD

2,435

Columbia-

Brazoria ISD

-104

Danbury

ISD

-50

Alvin

ISD

3,955

Angleton

ISD

-37

Needville ISD

49

Galveston

ISD

-2,008

Lamar

CISD

4,461

Brenham

ISD

-14

Navasota ISD

15

��

#��/�0��

��

��

1��

34��

��

��

1��

��2��

��

��

,��5��-��

A b s o l u t e C h a n g e i n S c h o o l D i s t r i c t E n r o l l m e n t

�!"#$!%

�� !��"��#$��%�� %�� %�&��


School Districts<-100-99 - 01 - 500501 - 2,0002,001 - 4,000>4,000


La Marque

ISD

-19.8%

Devers

ISD

26.2%

Dickinson

ISD

20.3%

Goose Creek

CISD

6.8%

Sweeny ISD

-5.6%

Hardin

ISD

-5.1%

Liberty

ISD

-5.4%

Dayton

ISD

-0.2%

Stafford

MSD

4.7%

Santa

Fe ISD

0.9%

Hempstead

ISD

7.5%

Hull-

Daisetta

ISD

-11%

West Hardin

County

CISD

-0.8%

Damon ISD

20.8%

Texas

City ISD

1.7%

Humble

ISD

15.2%

Bay City

ISD

-5.8%

Boling

ISD

7.3%

Aldine

ISD

9.3%

Spring ISD

13.2%

Brazos

ISD

3.3%

Splendora

ISD

3.2%

Katy ISD

21.9%

Van

Vleck ISD

-4%

Shepherd

ISD

4.9%

East

Bernard

ISD

2.5%

Tomball

ISD

21.9%

Houston

ISD

0.1%

Galena

Park ISD

2.8%

Klein

ISD

10.5%

Deer

Park ISD

3.4%

El Campo

ISD

3.1%

Sealy

ISD

3.4%

New

Caney ISD

30.2%

La Porte

ISD

-0.6%

Coldspring-

Oakhurst

CISD

-1%

Wharton

ISD

-8.4%

Cypress-

Fairbanks ISD

17.2%

Pearland

ISD

18.2%

Pasadena

ISD

6.2%

Willis

ISD

14.3%

Alief ISD

-0.6%

Spring

Branch ISD

4.7%

Conroe ISD

18.5%

Brazosport ISD

-4.7%

Barbers

Hill ISD

24.5%

Crosby

ISD

7.1%

Cleveland

ISD

6.7%

Tarkington

ISD

-3.9%

Huffman

ISD

6.8%

Anahuac

ISD

-15.6%

Royal

ISD

10.5%

Friendswood

ISD

1.3%

Sheldon

ISD

26.3%

Channelview

ISD

5%

North

Forest ISD

-22.5%

Richards ISD

0%

Clear

Creek ISD

10.4%

Montgomery

ISD

20.9%

Waller ISD

10.8%

Magnolia

ISD

14.1%

Anderson-

Shiro CISD

18.5%

Hitchcock

ISD

27.5%

Fort Bend

ISD

3.6%

Columbia-

Brazoria ISD

-3.4%

Danbury

ISD

-6.4%

Alvin ISD

27.7%

Angleton

ISD

-0.6%

Needville

ISD

1.9%

Galveston

ISD

-23.8%

Lamar

CISD

21.4%

Brenham

ISD

-0.3%

Navasota

ISD

0.5%

��

��

��

1��

��

��

1��

��2��

,��5��-��

Pe r c e n t C h a n g e i n S c h o o l D i s t r i c t E n r o l l m e n t

�� !��"��#$��%�� %�� %�&��

�


School Districts< -5.0%-4.9% - 0.0%0.1% - 5.0%5.1% - 15.0%15.1% - 21.0%>21.1%

�!"#$!%


La Marque ISD

7.1%

Devers ISD

12.4%

Dickinson ISD

8%

Goose Creek Consolidated ISD

7.6%

Sweeny ISD

6.6%Tidehaven ISD

7.4%

Hull-Daisetta ISD

5.7%

West Hardin County Cons ISD

8%

High Island ISD

5.6%

Damon ISD

9.7%

Texas City ISD

6.8%

Humble ISD

6.8%

Bay City ISD

7.6%

Boling ISD

6.5%

Aldine ISD

8.4%

Kountze ISD

7.8%

Spring ISD

7.1%

Brazos ISD

7.8%

Splendora ISD

7.5%

Katy ISD

6.9%

Van Vleck ISD

6%

Shepherd ISD

7.3%

East Bernard ISD

7%

Tomball ISD

7.7%

Houston ISD

8.2%

Galena Park ISD

6.8%

Klein ISD

6.8%

Deer Park ISD

6.7%

El Campo ISD

7.7%

Sealy ISD

6.7%

New Caney ISD

7.5%

La Porte ISD

7.4%

Coldspring-Oakhurst Cons ISD

7.1%

Wharton ISD

7.4%

Cypress-Fairbanks ISD

7.3%

New Waverly ISD

6.5%

Pearland ISD

7.3%

Pasadena ISD

7.5%

Hardin ISD

6.8%

Liberty ISD

6.8%

Willis ISD

6.7%

Dayton ISD

6.8%

Stafford MSD

6.4%

Alief ISD

7.9%

Spring Branch ISD

7.5%

Conroe ISD

7.3%

Brazosport ISD

7.5%

Barbers Hill ISD

7.5%

Crosby ISD

7.2%

Cleveland ISD

8.2%Tarkington ISD

7.1%

Huffman ISD

6.9%

Anahuac ISD

7%

Royal ISD

8.3%

Santa Fe ISD

6.5%

Huntsville ISD

7.7%

Friendswood ISD

5.2%

Sheldon ISD

7.4%Channelview ISD

7.4%

North Forest ISD

7.1%

Richards ISD

7.5%

Clear Creek ISD

6.7%

Hempstead ISD

8.1%

Livingston ISD

8.3%

Montgomery ISD

6.6%

Waller ISD

7.4%Bellville ISD

6.9%

Magnolia ISD

7%

Anderson-Shiro Cons ISD

7.4%

Hitchcock ISD

7.7%

Fort Bend ISD

6.2%


6.7%

Danbury ISD

7.2%

Alvin ISD

8.1%

Angleton ISD

7%

Needville ISD

7.5%

Galveston ISD

7.1%

Lamar Cons ISD

7.5%

Brenham ISD

6.9%

Navasota ISD

8.1%

��

(��6

#��/�0��

��

��

1��

34��

��

��

1�� 2��

��

��

��#0��

K i n d e r g a r t e n S t u d e n t s a s Pe r c e n t o f To t a l E n r o l l m e n t

�!"#$!%

�� !��"��#$��%�� %�� %�&�� ' �()��

�


School Districts0% - 6%6.1% - 6.8%6.9% - 7.3%7.4% - 7.5%7.6% - 8%8.1% - 8.5%


DickinsonISD

GooseCreek CISD

7.6%

DaytonISD

7.4%

StaffordMSD7.2%

SantaFe ISD

ClevelandISD

8.6%

HumbleISD

6.9%AldineISD

8.7%

SpringISD

SplendoraISD

6.6%

Katy ISD7.2%

ShepherdISD

TomballISD

7.9%

Houston ISD8.6%

GalenaPark ISD

7.1%

KleinISD7%

Deer Park ISD6.8%

NewCaney ISD

8%

La PorteISD7.4%


7.2%

PearlandISD

6.9%

PasadenaISD

7.6%

WillisISD

Alief ISD4.9%

SpringBranch ISD

7.7%

ConroeISD

7.4%

BarbersHill ISD

6.9%

CrosbyISD

7.1%

TarkingtonISD

HuffmanISD

7.7%

Friendswood ISD5.4%

SheldonISD

7.1% ChannelviewISD8%

NorthForest ISD

10.4%

ClearCreek ISD

6.8%

MontgomeryISD

6.4%

WallerISD

8.4%

Magnolia ISD6.9%

Fort Bend ISD6.2%

Alvin ISD7.9%

AngletonISD

LamarCISD7.9%

��

��

��

��

��


Percent KN0.0% - 6.0%6.1% - 6.9%7.0% - 7.2%7.3% - 7.6%7.7% - 8.0%> 8.0%

��

3"#$*%�� #0��Percent KN of Total Enrol lment

�!"#$!%& ��'��()*�#��#�'�� +


KN�as�a�Proportion�of�Total�Enrollment��Fall�2011All�Districts�with�20,000+�Students

Rank District NameKindergartenEnrollment

2011-12

TotalEnrollment

2011-12% KN

1 AUSTIN ISD 7,808 86,528 9.02%2 KILLEEN ISD 3,646 40,998 8.89%3 RICHARDSON ISD 3,262 37,044 8.81%4 FORT WORTH ISD 7,314 83,109 8.80%5 DALLAS ISD 13,739 157,574 8.72%6 FRISCO ISD 3,452 40,123 8.60%7 DENTON ISD 2,108 24,845 8.48%8 ALDINE ISD 5,379 64,300 8.37%9 ECTOR COUNTY ISD 2,354 28,533 8.25%10 AMARILLO ISD 2,718 32,995 8.24%11 HOUSTON ISD 16,675 203,066 8.21%12 MIDLAND ISD 1,835 22,626 8.11%13 CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH 2,141 26,423 8.10%14 LUBBOCK ISD 2,332 28,790 8.10%15 SAN ANTONIO ISD 4,376 54,394 8.05%16 LAREDO ISD 1,982 24,788 8.00%17 HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD ISD 1,699 21,570 7.88%18 ALIEF ISD 3,574 45,410 7.87%19 BIRDVILLE ISD 1,847 23,711 7.79%20 LA JOYA ISD 2,250 28,965 7.77%21 IRVING ISD 2,694 34,770 7.75%22 LEANDER ISD 2,550 33,309 7.66%23 GOOSE CREEK CISD 1,656 21,675 7.64%24 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD 2,950 38,678 7.63%25 SPRING BRANCH ISD 2,539 33,687 7.54%26 LAMAR CISD 1,904 25,278 7.53%27 ARLINGTON ISD 4,860 64,703 7.51%28 ROUND ROCK ISD 3,379 45,034 7.50%29 EDINBURG CISD 2,506 33,412 7.50%30 MCKINNEY ISD 1,853 24,733 7.49%31 PASADENA ISD 3,966 52,942 7.49%32 GRAND PRAIRIE ISD 1,967 26,607 7.39%33 CONROE ISD 3,865 52,664 7.34%34 PFLUGERVILLE ISD 1,688 23,070 7.32%35 JUDSON ISD 1,645 22,503 7.31%36 MESQUITE ISD 2,797 38,287 7.31%37 NORTHSIDE ISD 7,166 98,110 7.30%38 CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD 7,863 107,960 7.28%39 YSLETA ISD 3,228 44,376 7.27%40 MCALLEN ISD 1,833 25,252 7.26%41 NORTH EAST ISD 4,848 67,439 7.19%42 BROWNSVILLE ISD 3,543 49,654 7.14%43 PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO ISD 2,256 31,632 7.13%44 SPRING ISD 2,599 36,513 7.12%45 EL PASO ISD 4,563 64,214 7.11%


KN�as�a�Proportion�of�Total�Enrollment��Fall�2011All�Districts�with�20,000+�Students

Rank District NameKindergartenEnrollment

2011-12

TotalEnrollment

2011-12% KN

46 GARLAND ISD 4,094 58,151 7.04%47 KATY ISD 4,319 62,414 6.92%48 MANSFIELD ISD 2,253 32,564 6.92%49 PLANO ISD 3,834 55,659 6.89%50 LEWISVILLE ISD 3,570 51,920 6.88%51 KELLER ISD 2,275 33,130 6.87%52 HUMBLE ISD 2,471 36,076 6.85%

53 KLEIN ISD 3,148 46,002 6.84%54 GALENA PARK ISD 1,478 21,861 6.76%55 CLEAR CREEK ISD 2,621 39,209 6.68%56 UNITED ISD 2,784 42,179 6.60%57 SOCORRO ISD 2,826 43,672 6.47%58 FORT BEND ISD 4,335 69,449 6.24%

Statewide Average 7.6%


Klein�I.S.D.�:�Kinde

rgarten�En

rollm

ent�C

ompa

red�to

�Birth

s�(M

oved

�Five�Yea

rs�Forward)

1999

-00

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2011

-12

2012

-13

2013

-14

2014

-15

Kin

derg

arte

n En

rollm

ent

1,73

81,

760

1,95

42,

215

2,30

72,

379

2,73

22,

859

2,92

72,

982

3,08

73,

121

3,13

73,

289

3,48

93,

560

Birt

hs (A

djus

ted

5 ye

ars)

1,78

81,

761

1,77

81,

791

1,88

71,

925

2,09

52,

115

2,16

32,

337

2,33

62,

383

2,61

42,

786

2,93

12,

991

1,60

0

1,80

0

2,00

0

2,20

0

2,40

0

2,60

0

2,80

0

3,00

0

3,20

0

3,40

0

3,60

0

3,80

0

4,00

0

1999

-00

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2011

-12

2012

-13

2013

-14

2014

-15

Year

Students

Kin

derg

arte

n E

nrol

lmen

tB

irths

(Adj

uste

d 5

year

s)

KN

Enr

ollm

ent v

s B

irths

Pop

ulat

ion

and

Sur

vey

Ana

lyst

s


La Marque

ISD

-10.8%

Devers

ISD

109.1%

Dickinson

ISD

7.6%

Goose Creek

Consolidated

ISD

3.5%

Sweeny

ISD

-7.1%Tidehaven ISD

-30.6%

Hull-

Daisetta

ISD

-30%

West Hardin

County

Cons ISD

-2.1%

Damon ISD

-6.3%

Texas

City ISD

0.2%

Humble

ISD

-0.3%

Bay

City ISD

7.8%

Big Sandy

ISD (Polk)

2.5%

Boling

ISD

6.3%

Aldine

ISD

13%

Spring ISD

-0.7%

Brazos ISD

33.9%

Splendora

ISD

-0.8%

Katy ISD

-0.4%

Van

Vleck ISD

-12.8%

Shepherd

ISD

-14.9%

East

Bernard

ISD

-14.1%

Tomball

ISD

4.3%

Houston

ISD

10.3%

Galena

Park ISD

3%

Klein ISD

-3.8%

Deer

Park ISD

-4.2%

El Campo

ISD

5.9%

Sealy ISD

-10.9%

New

Caney ISD

5.9%

La Porte

ISD

-9.1%

Coldspring-

Oakhurst Cons ISD

-12.4%

Wharton

ISD

26%

Cypress-

Fairbanks ISD

-1.9%

New Waverly ISD

-4.6%

Pearland

ISD

-4%

Pasadena

ISD

9.5%

Hardin

ISD

-19.1%

Liberty

ISD

-2.3%

Willis

ISD

1.4%

Dayton

ISD

-2.7%

Stafford

MSD

0%

Alief ISD

19.8%

Spring

Branch ISD

-2.9%

Conroe

ISD

3.7%

Brazosport ISD

3.2%

Barbers

Hill ISD

-1.5%

Crosby ISD

-4.2%

Cleveland

ISD

-7.4%

Tarkington

ISD

-25.2%

Huffman

ISD

-0.8%

Anahuac

ISD

-11.7%

Royal ISD

14.3%

Santa

Fe ISD

2.1%

Friendswood

ISD

-26%

Sheldon

ISD

3.3%

Channelview

ISD

2.4%

North

Forest ISD

15.5%

Richards

ISD

-23.1%

Clear

Creek ISD

-6.7%

Hempstead

ISD

4.1%

Livingston

ISD

-0.3%

Montgomery

ISD

-0.2%

Waller ISD

-5.3%

Magnolia

ISD

-11.5%

Anderson-Shiro Cons

ISD

-18.5%

Hitchcock

ISD

15.4%

Fort

Bend ISD

-10.2%

Columbia-

Brazoria ISD

18.1%

Danbury

ISD

-30.9%

Alvin ISD

6.7%

Angleton

ISD

6.4%

Needville

ISD

-22.9%Galveston

ISD

4%

Lamar

Cons ISD

4.2%

Navasota

ISD

12.3%

��

(��6

#��/�0��

1��6�

��

��

1��

34��

��

��

1��

��2��

��#0��

D i f f e r e n c e i n 1 s t a n d 5 t h G r a d e E n r o l l m e n t

�!"#$!%

�� !��"��#$��%�� %�� %�&��


School Districts<-4.0%-3.9% - 0.0%0.1% - 4.0%4.1% - 10.0%10.1% - 15.0%>15.0%

Positive Percentages: 1st > 5thNegative Percentages: 5th > 1st


�1st�Grade�vs.�5th�Grade�Enrollment��Fall�2011All�Districts�with�20,000+�Students

Rank District Name1st

GradeFall, 2011

5thGrade

Fall, 2011

TotalEnrollmentFall, 2011

1st > 5th

Grade

1 LAREDO ISD 2,303 1,795 24,788 28.30%2 AUSTIN ISD 7,672 6,374 86,528 20.36%3 ALIEF ISD 4,016 3,353 45,410 19.77%4 KILLEEN ISD 3,657 3,064 40,998 19.35%5 FORT WORTH ISD 7,657 6,438 83,109 18.93%6 SAN ANTONIO ISD 4,596 3,989 54,394 15.22%7 ALDINE ISD 5,403 4,782 64,300 12.99%8 RICHARDSON ISD 3,090 2,750 37,044 12.36%9 AMARILLO ISD 2,692 2,409 32,995 11.75%10 LUBBOCK ISD 2,414 2,162 28,790 11.66%11 DALLAS ISD 14,123 12,654 157,575 11.61%12 HOUSTON ISD 17,253 15,646 203,066 10.27%13 PASADENA ISD 4,309 3,935 52,942 9.50%14 DENTON ISD 2,079 1,920 24,845 8.28%15 EL PASO ISD 4,994 4,637 64,214 7.70%16 LA JOYA ISD 2,336 2,171 28,965 7.60%17 BROWNSVILLE ISD 3,992 3,761 49,655 6.14%18 HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD ISD 1,689 1,593 21,570 6.03%19 CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD 2,048 1,936 26,423 5.79%20 BIRDVILLE ISD 1,835 1,738 23,711 5.58%21 FRISCO ISD 3,573 3,409 40,123 4.81%22 ARLINGTON ISD 4,954 4,738 64,703 4.56%23 IRVING ISD 2,687 2,578 34,770 4.23%24 LAMAR CISD 2,078 1,994 25,278 4.21%25 MIDLAND ISD 1,867 1,792 22,628 4.19%26 ROUND ROCK ISD 3,660 3,524 45,034 3.86%27 CONROE ISD 4,171 4,021 52,664 3.73%28 NORTHSIDE ISD 7,703 7,427 98,110 3.72%29 GOOSE CREEK CISD 1,643 1,588 21,675 3.46%30 GALENA PARK ISD 1,610 1,563 21,861 3.01%31 JUDSON ISD 1,744 1,700 22,503 2.59%32 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD 3,193 3,120 38,678 2.34%33 ECTOR COUNTY ISD 2,375 2,323 28,533 2.24%34 YSLETA ISD 3,255 3,206 44,376 1.53%35 GRAND PRAIRIE ISD 1,970 1,963 26,607 0.36%36 HUMBLE ISD 2,717 2,725 36,076 -0.29%37 KATY ISD 4,692 4,712 62,414 -0.42%38 SPRING ISD 2,836 2,855 36,513 -0.67%39 LEANDER ISD 2,669 2,694 33,309 -0.93%40 EDINBURG CISD 2,612 2,643 33,412 -1.17%41 MCALLEN ISD 1,904 1,929 25,252 -1.30%42 NORTH EAST ISD 5,027 5,105 67,439 -1.53%43 CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD 7,949 8,102 107,960 -1.89%44 GARLAND ISD 4,293 4,383 58,151 -2.05%


�1st�Grade�vs.�5th�Grade�Enrollment��Fall�2011All�Districts�with�20,000+�Students

Rank District Name1st

GradeFall, 2011

5thGrade

Fall, 2011

TotalEnrollmentFall, 2011

1st > 5th

Grade

45 UNITED ISD 3,171 3,256 42,179 -2.61%46 SPRING BRANCH ISD 2,487 2,560 33,687 -2.85%47 KLEIN ISD 3,306 3,437 46,002 -3.81%48 MCKINNEY ISD 1,878 1,958 24,733 -4.09%49 LEWISVILLE ISD 3,855 4,020 51,920 -4.10%50 PFLUGERVILLE ISD 1,746 1,840 23,070 -5.11%51 SOCORRO ISD 3,120 3,299 43,672 -5.43%52 MANSFIELD ISD 2,383 2,520 32,564 -5.44%53 KELLER ISD 2,567 2,720 33,130 -5.63%54 MESQUITE ISD 2,781 2,962 38,287 -6.11%55 PLANO ISD 4,023 4,293 55,659 -6.29%56 CLEAR CREEK ISD 2,706 2,899 39,209 -6.66%57 FORT BEND ISD 4,754 5,293 69,449 -10.18%58 PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO ISD 2,221 2,480 31,634 -10.44%

Statewide Average 3.9%


Klein�I.S.D.:�Comparison�of�Grade�1�and�Grade�5�by�School�Zone,�2012�13

School 1stgrade

5thgrade

Difference(1st-5th) % Difference

Benfer 101 120 -19 -16%Benignus 130 151 -21 -14%Blackshear Elementary 149 128 21 16%Brill 96 123 -27 -22%Ehrhardt 99 115 -16 -14%Eiland 81 103 -22 -21%Epps Island 132 128 4 3%Frank 152 109 43 39%Greenwood Forest 125 117 8 7%Hassler 107 107 0 0%Haude 88 115 -27 -23%Kaiser 147 135 12 9%Klenk 127 137 -10 -7%Kohrville 164 140 24 17%Krahn 114 123 -9 -7%Kreinhop 139 141 -2 -1%Kuehnle 101 114 -13 -11%Lemm 86 98 -12 -12%McDougle 112 96 16 17%Metzler 138 155 -17 -11%Mittelstadt 120 116 4 3%Mueller 116 122 -6 -5%Nitsch 124 119 5 4%Northampton 134 145 -11 -8%Roth 122 108 14 13%Schultz 113 131 -18 -14%Theiss 88 117 -29 -25%Zwink 126 104 22 21%Total: 3331 3417 -86 -3%

**Number of students is based on current geo-coded 1st and 5th grade students.

Yellow: 5th > 1st

Green: 1st > 5th


Histo

rica

l�Growth

�Trend

s�by

�Grade

�and

�Grade

�Group

�in�Klein�I.S.D.

% C

hg.

% C

hg.

% C

hg.

% C

hg.

% C

hg%

Chg

% C

hg%

Chg

% C

hg%

Chg

% C

hg

2002

-03

01-0

2/20

03-0

403

-04/

2004

-05

04-0

5/20

05-0

605

-06/

2006

-07

06-0

7/20

07-0

807

-08/

2008

-09

08-0

9/20

09-1

009

-10/

2010

-11

10-1

1/20

11-1

211

-12/

2012

-13

12-1

3/

00-0

102

-03

03-0

404

-05

05-0

606

-07

07-0

808

-09

09-1

010

-11

11-1

2

EE76

910

.97%

97-8

7.39

%22

913

6.08

%22

6-1

.31%

207

-8.4

1%99

-52.

17%

79-2

0.20

%91

15.1

9%11

526

.37%

140

21.7

4%25

179

.17%

PK74

714

.40%

816

9.24

%86

56.

00%

961

11.1

0%10

165.

72%

1028

1.18

%10

522.

33%

1096

4.18

%11

888.

39%

1211

1.94

%11

12-8

.19%

KG

2215

13.3

6%23

074.

15%

2379

3.12

%27

3214

.84%

2859

4.65

%29

242.

27%

2965

1.40

%30

874.

11%

3121

1.10

%31

370.

51%

3289

4.84

%

123

545.

14%

2492

5.86

%25

241.

28%

2724

7.92

%30

7012

.70%

3122

1.69

%30

70-1

.67%

3221

4.92

%32

320.

34%

3291

1.83

%33

371.

39%

223

352.

28%

2447

4.80

%26

227.

15%

2714

3.51

%29

207.

59%

3240

10.9

6%32

700.

93%

3206

-1.9

6%32

621.

75%

3359

2.97

%34

382.

35%

323

74-1

.41%

2444

2.95

%25

926.

06%

2930

13.0

4%29

540.

82%

3060

3.59

%32

807.

19%

3383

3.14

%33

16-1

.98%

3399

2.50

%34

310.

94%

424

92-0

.24%

2520

1.12

%26

003.

17%

2799

7.65

%31

1211

.18%

3102

-0.3

2%31

722.

26%

3354

5.74

%33

740.

60%

3377

0.09

%34

943.

47%

525

942.

69%

2599

0.19

%26

913.

54%

2856

6.13

%30

366.

30%

3242

6.79

%32

00-1

.30%

3299

3.09

%34

604.

88%

3436

-0.6

9%34

24-0

.34%

627

23-0

.48%

2807

3.08

%28

160.

32%

2984

5.97

%31

094.

19%

3247

4.44

%34

275.

54%

3371

-1.6

3%33

910.

59%

3617

6.66

%36

300.

36%

729

044.

01%

2876

-0.9

6%29

924.

03%

3045

1.77

%31

934.

86%

3267

2.32

%32

980.

95%

3541

7.37

%33

60-5

.11%

3508

4.40

%37

266.

21%

828

04-1

.58%

2926

4.35

%29

791.

81%

3132

5.14

%31

540.

70%

3248

2.98

%33

944.

50%

3371

-0.6

8%35

635.

70%

3412

-4.2

4%35

935.

29%

935

841.

27%

3664

2.23

%38

154.

12%

4147

8.70

%45

088.

71%

3794

-15.

84%

4009

5.67

%40

881.

97%

3911

-4.3

3%40

152.

66%

4088

1.83

%

1028

5324

.21%

2974

4.24

%31

054.

40%

3195

2.90

%32

642.

16%

3367

3.16

%32

84-2

.47%

3358

2.25

%34

793.

60%

3593

3.28

%35

56-1

.04%

1123

07-1

0.96

%22

11-4

.16%

2396

8.37

%23

49-1

.96%

2442

3.96

%31

0026

.95%

3277

5.71

%32

29-1

.46%

3283

1.67

%33

211.

16%

3438

3.53

%

1223

006.

24%

2378

3.39

%23

59-0

.80%

2638

11.8

3%27

684.

93%

2903

4.88

%28

82-0

.72%

3062

6.25

%31

071.

47%

3209

3.28

%31

35-2

.29%

EE-1

2 To

tal

35,3

55

3.31

%35

,558

0.

57%

36,9

64

3.95

%39

,432

6.

68%

41,6

125.

53%

42,7

432.

72%

43,6

592.

14%

44,7

572.

51%

45,1

620.

90%

46,0

251.

91%

46,9

421.

99%

EE-5

th15

880

4.10

%15

722

-0.9

9%16

502

4.96

%17

942

8.73

%19

174

6.87

%19

817

3.35

%20

088

1.37

%20

737

3.23

%21

068

1.60

%21

350

1.34

%21

776

1.99

%6t

h-8t

h84

310.

64%

8609

2.11

%87

872.

07%

9161

4.26

%94

563.

22%

9762

3.24

%10

119

3.66

%10

283

1.62

%10

314

0.30

%10

537

2.16

%10

948

3.90

%9t

h-12

th11

044

4.27

%11

227

1.66

%11

675

3.99

%12

329

5.60

%12

982

5.30

%13

164

1.40

%13

452

2.19

%13

737

2.12

%13

780

0.31

%14

138

2.60

%14

218

0.56

%

% E

E-5t

h44

.92%

44.2

2%44

.64%

45.5

0%46

.08%

46.3

6%46

.01%

46.3

3%46

.65%

46.3

9%46

.39%

% 6

th-8

th23

.85%

24.2

1%23

.77%

23.2

3%22

.72%

22.8

4%23

.18%

22.9

8%22

.84%

22.8

9%23

.32%

% 9

th-1

2th

31.2

4%31

.57%

31.5

8%31

.27%

31.2

0%30

.80%

30.8

1%30

.69%

30.5

1%30

.72%

30.2

9%

PA

SA

-Pop

ulat

ion

and

Sur

vey

Ana

lyst

s


Galena Park

79.4%

Montgomery

27.7%

Navasota

77.4%

West Hardin County Cons.

50.3%

Hardin

54.2%Willis

60.6%

Tarkington

48.6%

Cleveland

78.4%

Conroe

36.8%

Brenham

57.5%

Splendora

64.8%Magnolia

40.9%

Sweeny

52%

Brazosport

58.1%Tidehaven

65%

Deer Park

44.8%

Lamar Consolidated

47.2%

Pasadena

79.7%

Alief

80.8% La Porte

48.1%

Fort Bend

37.8%

Goodrich

83.3%Richards

64.7%

New Waverly

50.9%

Shepherd

70.5%

Livingston

65.1%Huntsville

62.3%

Coldspring-Oakhurst Cons.

65.2%

Big Sandy

47.5%

Anderson-Shiro Cons.

45.7%

Kountze

50.8%

Dayton

60.6%

Hull-Daisetta

75.9%

Waller

63.9%Hempstead

75.3%

New Caney

63.7%

Huffman

36.6%

Tomball

25.9%

Humble

34.9%

Devers

42.1%

Klein

41.9%

Liberty

58.7%Spring

72.6%Bellville

47.5%

Aldine

84.9%

Cypress-Fairbanks

48.5%

Crosby

49.8%

Sheldon

78.7%North Forest

100%Royal

82.2%

Anahuac

55.3%

Katy

31.2%

Barbers Hill

23.5%

Houston

80.4%

Sealy

56.7%

Goose Creek

63.6%

Spring Branch

58.6%

Channelview

78.7%

Brazos

55.6%

Stafford MSD

64.7%

High Island

63.9%Clear Creek

28%

East Bernard

34.3%

Pearland

26.8%

Alvin

52.8%

Galveston

72.7%

Friendswood

8%

Dickinson

64.1%

El Campo

65.9%

Santa Fe

35.6%

Texas City

66.1%Needville

37.1%La Marque

75.9%

Angleton

60.4%

Boling

55.4%

Hitchcock

83.7%

Wharton

80.3%

Columbia-Brazoria

52.4%

Damon

69.9%Danbury

31.4%

Van Vleck

57.3%

Bay City

73.3%

Grimes San Jacinto

Walker

Montgomery

Liberty

WallerHarris

Austin

Chambers

Fort Bend

WhartonBrazoria

Galveston

Hardin

2011-12 School Year

E c o n om i c a l l y D i s a d v a n t a g e d Po p u l a t i o n

HOUSTON

Source:�Texas�Education�Agency,�Public�Education�Information�Management�System�Division0 9 184.5 Miles

[


School Districts0.0% - 30.0%30.1% - 40.0%40.1% - 55.0%55.1% - 65.0%65.1% - 80.0%80.1% - 100%


Galena Park

5.1%

Montgomery

3.1%

Navasota

11.4%

West Hardin County Cons.

2.2%

Hardin

7.3%

Willis

7.2%

Tarkington

10.1%

Cleveland

11.6%

Conroe

4.7%

Brenham

10.9%

Splendora

7.1%

Magnolia

5.9%

Sweeny

12%

Brazosport

7.3%Tidehaven

7.7%

Deer Park

8.1%

Lamar Consolidated

1.9%

Pasadena

9.6%

Alief

11.5%La Porte

10.1%

Fort Bend

6.8%

Goodrich

2.5%Richards

18.1%

New Waverly

0.7%Shepherd

14%

Livingston

9.3%Huntsville

2.9%

Coldspring-Oakhurst Cons.

5.6%

Big Sandy

-2.1%

Anderson-Shiro Cons.

3.3%

Kountze

10.6%

Dayton

11.1%

Hull-Daisetta

19.5%

Waller

10.5%

Hempstead

1.6%

New Caney

8.4%

Huffman

10.8%

Tomball

5.9%

Humble

9.1%

Devers

-3.3%Klein

8%

Liberty

1.8%

Spring

13%Bellville

12.6%

Aldine

3.8%

Cypress-Fairbanks

14.4%

Crosby

6.9%Sheldon

3.1%North Forest

3%Royal

6.8%

Anahuac

8.3%

Katy

7.1%

Barbers Hill

3.9%

Houston

2.4%

Sealy

7%

Goose Creek

4.7%

Spring Branch

3.1%

Channelview

9.3%

Brazos

10.7%

Stafford MSD

14.5%

High Island

13.2%Clear Creek

9.8%

East Bernard

1.1%

Pearland

4.8%

Alvin

2.4%

Galveston

7.4%Friendswood

2.8%Dickinson

4%

El Campo

2.8%

Santa Fe

6%

Texas City

7.8%Needville

6.1%La Marque

9.3%

Angleton

12.4%

Boling

3.7%

Hitchcock

13.8%

Wharton

12.7%

Columbia-Brazoria

7%

Damon

8.2% Danbury

2%

Van Vleck

11%

Bay City

15.6%

��#��/�0��

1��6�

��

��

1��

��

34��

��

��

1��2��

��

��

,��5��-��

C h a n g e i n t h e E c o n o m i c a l l y D i s a d v a n t a g e d Po p u l a t i o n

�!"#$!%

�� !��"��#$��%�� %�� %�&�� ' �()��

�


School DistrictsDecrease0.1% - 2%2.1% - 5%5.1% - 7.5%7.6% - 10%>10%


Economically�Disadvantaged�PopulationAll�Districts�with�20,000+�Students

Rank District Name EconomicallyDisadvantaged

TotalEnrollment

PercentEconomically

Disadvantaged

1 FRISCO ISD 4,911 40,123 12.24%2 KELLER ISD 7,173 33,130 21.65%3 LEANDER ISD 7,323 33,309 21.99%4 PLANO ISD 14,363 55,659 25.81%5 LEWISVILLE ISD 14,438 51,920 27.81%6 CLEAR CREEK ISD 10,977 39,209 28.00%7 MCKINNEY ISD 7,175 24,733 29.01%8 ROUND ROCK ISD 13,385 45,034 29.72%9 KATY ISD 19,459 62,414 31.18%10 HUMBLE ISD 12,601 36,076 34.93%11 CONROE ISD 19,362 52,664 36.77%12 MANSFIELD ISD 12,120 32,564 37.22%13 FORT BEND ISD 26,267 69,449 37.82%14 KLEIN ISD 19,287 46,002 41.93%15 DENTON ISD 10,696 24,845 43.05%16 NORTH EAST ISD 30,436 67,439 45.13%17 LAMAR CISD 11,923 25,278 47.17%18 CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD 52,394 107,960 48.53%19 MIDLAND ISD 11,120 22,626 49.15%20 HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD ISD 11,200 21,570 51.92%21 PFLUGERVILLE ISD 12,159 23,070 52.70%22 NORTHSIDE ISD 52,438 98,110 53.45%23 KILLEEN ISD 22,370 40,998 54.56%24 BIRDVILLE ISD 13,274 23,711 55.98%25 RICHARDSON ISD 21,080 37,044 56.91%26 ECTOR COUNTY ISD 16,245 28,533 56.93%27 SPRING BRANCH ISD 19,735 33,687 58.58%28 GARLAND ISD 35,153 58,151 60.45%29 CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD 16,420 26,423 62.14%30 GOOSE CREEK CISD 13,792 21,675 63.63%31 JUDSON ISD 14,362 22,503 63.82%32 AUSTIN ISD 55,318 86,528 63.93%33 LUBBOCK ISD 18,699 28,790 64.95%34 ARLINGTON ISD 42,275 64,703 65.34%35 AMARILLO ISD 22,011 32,995 66.71%36 MCALLEN ISD 16,858 25,252 66.76%37 MESQUITE ISD 26,096 38,287 68.16%38 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD 26,964 38,678 69.71%39 EL PASO ISD 45,708 64,214 71.18%40 SOCORRO ISD 31,498 43,672 72.12%41 GRAND PRAIRIE ISD 19,263 26,607 72.40%42 SPRING ISD 26,512 36,513 72.61%43 UNITED ISD 31,388 42,179 74.42%44 FORT WORTH ISD 64,288 83,109 77.35%45 GALENA PARK ISD 17,351 21,861 79.37%46 PASADENA ISD 42,213 52,942 79.73%47 HOUSTON ISD 163,199 203,066 80.37%48 ALIEF ISD 36,675 45,410 80.76%49 YSLETA ISD 36,055 44,376 81.25%50 IRVING ISD 28,343 34,770 81.52%51 ALDINE ISD 54,602 64,300 84.92%52 EDINBURG CISD 28,489 33,412 85.27%


Economically�Disadvantaged�PopulationAll�Districts�with�20,000+�Students

Rank District Name EconomicallyDisadvantaged

TotalEnrollment

PercentEconomically

Disadvantaged

53 DALLAS ISD 135,415 157,574 85.94%54 PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO ISD 28,146 31,632 88.98%55 SAN ANTONIO ISD 50,336 54,394 92.54%56 LA JOYA ISD 27,640 28,965 95.43%57 BROWNSVILLE ISD 47,665 49,654 95.99%58 LAREDO ISD 24,077 24,788 97.13%


��

��

��

�

��2��

��

�4��

�

1��

(��6

$��

#��/�0��

1��6�

��

�

1��

��

34��

��

�

��

� �

�

��

1��

��2��

��

��

#'��

��

- 7

8��

.-7

#��

'��

597

)��

��

.�7

$��

��.97

��4

��

-�7

��

�(�6

.�7

8��

.�7

:��

�(�6

.,7

)��

��'�

-�7

#��

�-,

7

%�;

��

�-<7

��(��

.�7

��'��!�6�4

��

��

�5�

7

1��

5,7

�'��

6�.�

7

%�;�1��

-<7

(��

��

�.5

7

(��

��

-�7

��

5.7

��

5<7

1��

-.7

:��

5.7

#��==��

�#:

5.7

3��

=-�7

#'��

��0�

-.7

��

��

.,7

��

��

.<7

��

-97

��

,<7

$�6��

-�7

�4==��

-<7

�4�

��

.�7

>��

5 7

#��

-,7

�4�

��

-,7

��

�;��

�<9

7

#��

5-7

��

��;

-�7

%��

��

5�7

>�0��

-�7

��

��6

.<7

��4�

4�

- 7

��

'��

5<7

��

-�7

��

��

<�7

1��

--7

��

.�7

��

��

.�7

3��

��#��

��

.-7

��0�0�

06,�7

��

��

.�7

��

5<7

��4� ��2��

--7

:�� 4

.57

3��

.�7

3��

��

.57

%��

��

.57

��

557

��/�==��

.97

#��6

5<7

��

��-<

7

��

#��

.-7

%��

5�7

��?4�

5�7

:��

<�7

:�06��

--7

)��

��

� �

�.�

7��

��6

��

-,7

�4��:

��

5.7

1��

.�7

1��

��4

��

�5�

7

3��

�4�0

.�7

��

*��

597

:��

��--7

$�@��

��

-�7

>�0�

��

�5�7

��#��

&(��6+

5.7

��

��0�

, 7

��

-<7

3��

--7

8�4

��2�

-�7

#'��

5.7

��4��

-�7

��2��

.�7

��

��

�. 7

(�0��

��=�#�4��

��

��

��$3

8#�#��

��

Sch

oo

l D

istr

icts

in

th

e H

ou

sto

n M

etro

Are

a

Lege

nd Wat

er B

odie

s

Cou

nty

Bou

ndar

ies

Perc

ent M

et0%

- 60

%

61%

- 65

%

66%

- 70

%

71%

- 75

%

76%

- 80

%

81%

- 85

%

86%

- 98

%


Klein�I.S.D.

�201

2�Se

lected

�Soc

ioec

onom

ic�Cha

racteristics�fo

r�Klein�I.S.D.�a

s�Co

mpa

red�with�Adjac

ent�a

nd/or�C

ompa

rable�Sc

hool�Districts�in

�the�Hou

ston

�Area

Num

ber

Perc

enta

geN

umbe

rPe

rcen

tage

Num

ber

Perc

enta

geN

umbe

rPe

rcen

tage

Num

ber

Perc

enta

geN

umbe

rPe

rcen

tage

Tota

l hou

sing

uni

ts82

,850

62,9

7010

1,85

692

,198

175,

006

10,0

99,2

42O

ccup

ied

hous

ing

units

78,4

3995

%58

,897

94%

94,4

9293

%85

8,58

093

1%16

4,43

494

%8,

850,

370

88%

Vac

ant h

ousi

ng u

nits

4,41

15%

4,07

36%

7,36

47%

6,61

87%

10,5

726%

1,24

8,87

212

%O

wne

r-oc

cupi

ed57

,518

45,5

0061

,236

64,7

6511

1,75

65,

568,

300

Ren

ter-

occu

pied

20,9

2113

,397

33,2

5620

,815

52,6

783,

282,

070

Age

Und

er 5

yea

rs21

,356

9%13

,691

8%21

,698

8%19

,293

7%42

,819

9%1,

953,

347

8%5

to 9

yea

rs24

,522

10%

12,2

597%

24,3

569%

22,3

719%

43,9

189%

1,98

1,16

38%

10 to

14

year

s18

,821

8%13

,143

7%21

,872

8%24

,465

9%36

,365

7%1,

901,

653

7%15

to 1

9 ye

ars

17,6

057%

15,7

919%

21,0

968%

16,5

416%

33,6

267%

1,89

0,21

77%

5 to

17

year

s54

,378

22%

36,0

6020

%59

,171

21%

58,5

9122

%10

2,07

421

%5,

004,

335

19%

20 to

24

year

s10

,861

4%10

,190

6%16

,772

6%12

,959

5%35

,504

7%1,

873,

910

7%25

to 3

4 ye

ars

31,6

8613

%23

,332

13%

38,3

3214

%38

,634

15%

74,9

4815

%3,

671,

399

14%

35 to

44

year

s41

,950

17%

30,9

7117

%42

,226

15%

40,3

9515

%76

,784

15%

3,51

2,49

014

%45

to 5

4 ye

ars

31,0

0613

%25

,148

14%

38,7

4414

%41

,309

16%

67,0

9814

%3,

449,

260

13%

55 to

59

year

s14

,342

6%11

,664

6%15

,102

5%15

,424

6%30

,504

6%1,

465,

217

6%60

to 6

4 ye

ars

11,7

775%

9,44

95%

11,3

134%

11,3

904%

20,8

644%

1,26

8,20

05%

65 to

74

year

s13

,220

5%8,

713

5%14

,543

5%12

,578

5%21

,234

4%1,

541,

420

6%75

to 8

4 ye

ars

5,59

02%

4,51

53%

7,92

83%

4,89

62%

9,12

22%

844,

061

3%85

yea

rs a

nd o

ver

1,26

51%

1,18

91%

3,26

11%

1,32

41%

3750

1%32

2,34

41%

Med

ian

Age

34.4

35.5

33.1

34.2

32.3

33.7

Cla

ss o

f Wor

ker

Priv

ate

wag

e an

d sa

lary

95

,565

84%

69,9

4780

%10

6,36

782

%10

4,35

981

%20

8,07

683

%8,

974,

528

78%

Gov

ernm

ent

14,3

2813

%13

,467

15%

14,7

1911

%16

,460

13%

24,5

9710

%1,

690,

732

15%

Sel

f-em

ploy

ed3,

814

3%3,

707

4%8,

682

7%7,

472

6%16

,601

7%77

3,81

77%

Unp

aid

fam

ily w

orke

rs22

0%0

0%26

20%

154

0%31

60%

15,9

920%

Inco

me

and

Ben

efits

Tota

l hou

seho

lds

78,4

3958

,897

94,4

9285

,580

164,

434

8,85

0,37

0le

ss th

an $

10,0

002,

954

4%1,

279

2%4,

856

5%1,

461

2%7,

512

5%70

7,89

58%

$10,

000

to $

14,9

992,

464

3%1,

306

2%56

706%

995

1%5,

833

4%51

1,13

96%

$15,

000

to $

24,9

995,

769

7%2,

260

4%8,

638

9%7,

501

9%13

,646

8%1,

038,

328

12%

$25,

000

to $

34,9

993,

925

5%3,

661

6%6,

709

7%4,

856

6%14

,514

9%96

2,08

711

%$3

5,00

0 to

$49

,999

7,69

910

%6,

601

11%

11,7

2812

%10

,242

12%

21,1

0713

%1,

247,

252

14%

$50,

000

to $

74,9

9917

,063

22%

10,0

2317

%15

,537

16%

13,6

6416

%29

,032

18%

1,57

4,04

918

%$7

5,00

0 to

$99

,999

14,8

8319

%9,

684

16%

10,7

4211

%13

,454

16%

21,9

6613

%1,

001,

080

11%

$100

,000

to $

149,

999

13,0

0617

%13

,025

22%

14,1

9715

%16

,930

20%

26,9

4716

%1,

054,

481

12%

$150

,000

to $

199,

999

5,27

57%

5,30

99%

7,73

68%

7,35

89%

11,8

357%

379,

364

4%$2

00,0

00 o

r mor

e5,

401

7%5,

749

10%

8,67

99%

9,11

911

%12

,042

7%37

4,69

54%

Med

ian

hous

ehol

d in

com

e $7

3,38

5$8

4,05

1$6

5,16

8$8

1,51

8$6

4,74

3$4

9,39

2

Kle

in IS

D

Hou

sing

261,

579

244,

001

Tota

l Pop

ulat

ion

180,

055

277,

243

Hum

ble

ISD

Kat

y IS

DC

onro

e IS

DSt

ate

of T

exas

25,6

74,6

81

Cy-

Fair

ISD

496,

536

* D

ata

Gat

here

d Fr

om th

e 20

11 A

mer

ican

Com

mun

ity S

urve

y1-Y

ear E

stim

ates


Klein�I.S.D.

�201

2�Se

lected

�Soc

ioec

onom

ic�Cha

racteristics�fo

r�Klein�I.S.D.�a

s�Co

mpa

red�with�Adjac

ent�a

nd/or�C

ompa

rable�Sc

hool�Districts�in

�the�Hou

ston

�Area

Kle

in IS

DH

umbl

e IS

DK

aty

ISD

Con

roe

ISD

Stat

e of

Tex

asC

y-Fa

ir IS

D

Educ

atio

nal A

ttain

men

t

Pop

ulat

ion

25 y

ears

& o

ver

150,

836

114,

981

171,

449

165,

950

304,

304

16,0

74,3

91Le

ss th

an 9

th g

rade

8,37

56%

3,88

23%

11,0

886%

5,70

23%

17,2

376%

1,52

9,21

610

%9t

h to

12t

h gr

ade,

no

dipl

oma

9,48

16%

3,49

23%

13,1

568%

7,54

45%

18,4

566%

1,51

3,01

19%

H.S

. gra

duat

e36

,556

24%

22,0

3119

%35

,482

21%

30,5

6518

%69

,968

23%

4,09

9,51

926

%S

ome

colle

ge, n

o de

gree

37,7

2425

%27

,929

24%

38,0

3722

%32

,946

20%

70,9

0123

%3,

632,

685

23%

Ass

ocia

te's

deg

ree

11,2

287%

10,5

149%

10,8

976%

15,7

599%

23,8

788%

1,05

2,28

17%

Bac

helo

r's d

egre

e32

,601

22%

29,9

5426

%41

,592

24%

51,0

4031

%75

,338

25%

2,84

7,50

118

%G

radu

ate

or p

rofe

ssio

nal d

egre

e14

,871

10%

17,1

7915

%21

,197

12%

22,3

9413

%28

,526

9%1,

400,

178

9%H

.S. g

radu

ate

or h

ighe

r88

%94

%86

%92

%88

%81

%B

ache

lor's

deg

ree

of h

ighe

r31

%41

%37

%44

%34

%26

%R

esid

ence

1 y

ear a

go

P

opul

atio

n 1

year

& o

ver

240,

488

177,

043

274,

444

258,

542

489,

835

25,3

27,1

04S

ame

hous

e 20

8,22

387

%15

5,99

888

%21

2,49

777

%22

3,33

186

%42

8,27

787

%20

,984

,855

83%

Diff

eren

t hou

se in

the

U.S

.31

,626

13%

20,0

4011

%58

,658

21%

34,1

1513

%59

,169

12%

4,16

2,98

616

% S

ame

coun

ty25

,689

11%

13,5

068%

32,9

6712

%15

,553

6%48

,274

10%

2,69

0,33

811

% D

iffer

ent c

ount

y5,

937

2%6,

534

4%25

,691

9%18

,562

7%10

,895

2%1,

472,

648

6% S

ame

stat

e3,

955

2%3,

129

2%13

,896

5%14

,774

6%4,

067

1%95

7,92

24%

Diff

eren

t sta

te1,

982

1%3,

405

2%11

,795

4%3,

788

1%6,

828

1%51

4,72

62%

Abr

oad

639

0%1,

005

1%3,

289

1%1,

096

0%23

890%

179,

263

1%C

omm

utin

g to

wor

k

Wor

kers

16

year

s &

ove

r11

1,98

186

,500

128,

585

126,

473

246,

054

11,3

36,4

74C

ar, t

ruck

or v

an--

drov

e al

one

94,4

2684

%73

,486

85%

98,0

3476

%10

5,46

783

%20

4,35

483

%9,

045,

425

80%

Car

, tru

ck o

r van

--ca

rpoo

led

10,0

369%

6,35

67%

18,6

6215

%10

,295

8%21

,260

9%1,

252,

849

11%

Pub

lic tr

ansp

orta

tion

(exc

ludi

ng ta

xis)

1,87

72%

2,02

72%

1,72

41%

2,92

22%

4,53

72%

176,

090

2%W

alke

d33

30%

219

0%1,

163

1%1,

247

1%3,

098

1%19

1,12

82%

Oth

er m

eans

2,02

12%

1,23

81%

1,94

72%

1,78

91%

3,25

81%

196,

031

2%W

orke

d at

hom

e3,

288

3%3,

174

4%7,

055

5%4,

753

4%9,

547

4%47

4,95

14%

Mea

n tr

avel

tim

e to

wor

k (m

ins.

)29

.630

.530

.230

30.3

24.8

* D

ata

Gat

here

d Fr

om th

e 20

11 A

mer

ican

Com

mun

ity S

urve

y1-Y

ear E

stim

ates


Liberty ISD

21.2%, 19.1%

Grimes

San Jacinto

Montgomery

Liberty

Waller

Harris

Cha

Fort Bend

arton

Brazoria

Galveston

Matagorda

Hardi

La Marque ISD

67.8%, 70.1%

Dickinson ISD

14.6%, 14.9%

Goose Creek CISD

19.8%, 16.3%

Sweeny ISD

18.4%, 16.3%

Hardin ISD

4%, 3.8%

Dayton ISD

10.4%, 8.3%

Stafford MSD

34.6%, 39.2%

Santa Fe ISD

0.5%, 0.5%

Hempstead ISD

30.8%, 27.6%

Hull-Daisetta ISD

19.9%, 13.7%

West Hardin County CISD

0.7%, 0.8%

Damon ISD

0%, 1.1%

Texas City ISD

20.4%, 19.7%

Humble ISD

16.6%, 17.7%

Bay City ISD

17.4%, 16%

Big Sandy ISD

0%, 0%

Boling ISD

14.2%, 10.7%

Aldine ISD

31.4%, 25.9%

Spring ISD

38.5%, 40.3%

Brazos ISD

15.2%, 9.8%

Splendora ISD

1.1%, 1%

Katy ISD

9.3%, 9.6%

Van Vleck ISD

19.8%, 12.7%

Shepherd ISD

8.7%, 6%

East Bernard ISD

7.7%, 6.5%

Tomball ISD

6.9%, 5.3%

Houston ISD

29.2%, 25.1%

Galena Park ISD

20.8%, 16.7%

Klein ISD

15.7%, 14%

Deer Park ISD

2.3%, 2.4%

El Campo ISD

14.4%, 12.6%

Sealy ISD

13.9%, 10.4%

New Caney ISD

3%, 3.1%

La Porte ISD

8.9%, 7%


24.1%, 23.3%

Wharton ISD

29.8%, 28%


14.6%, 16.1%

New Waverly ISD

26.1%, 22.1%

Pearland ISD

16.8%, 16.4%

Pasadena ISD

7.7%, 6.5%

Willis ISD

9.1%, 8%

Alief ISD

37.2%, 32%

Spring Branch ISD

7.6%, 5.1%

Conroe ISD

6.6%, 6%

Brazosport ISD

10.2%, 8%

Barbers Hill ISD

3.4%, 3.3%

Crosby ISD

22.1%, 18.1%

Cleveland ISD

14.1%, 11.6% Tarkington ISD

1%, 0.5%

Huffman ISD

1.8%, 2.1%

Anahuac ISD

20%, 16%

Royal ISD

28.3%, 21.1%

Friendswood ISD

2.2%, 2%

Sheldon ISD

26.8%, 21.5%

Channelview ISD

15.5%, 13.1%

North Forest ISD

71.8%, 64.8%

Richards ISD

10.5%, 4.5%

Clear Creek ISD

8.9%, 8.3%

Livingston ISD

12.9%, 11.1%

Montgomery ISD

5.5%, 3.6%

Waller ISD

15.2%, 10.8%

Magnolia ISD

3.1%, 2.2%

Anderson-Shiro CISD

12.7%, 8.6%

Hitchcock ISD

34.7%, 42.2%

Fort Bend ISD

32.2%, 29.5%


14.7%, 11.2%

Danbury ISD

0.6%, 1.1%

Alvin ISD

9%, 13.1%

Angleton ISD

15.7%, 11.7%

Needville ISD

5.3%, 4%

Galveston ISD

30.8%, 23.7%

Lamar CISD

17.4%, 18.6%

Brenham ISD

25.7%, 23%

Navasota ISD

29.2%, 26%

,��5��-��

C h a n g e i n t h e Pe r c e n t o f A f r i c a n - A m e r i c a n S t u d e n t s

�!"#$!%

�� !��"��#$��%�� %�� %�&��

�


School DistrictsSignificant DecreaseSlight DecreaseStable PercentageSlight IncreaseSignificant IncreaseSubstantial Increase


Grimes

San Jacinto

Montgomery

Liberty

Waller

Harris

Cha

Fort Bend

arton

Brazoria

Galveston

Matagorda

Hardi

La Marque ISD

19%, 19.5%

Devers ISD

30.5%, 20.8%

Dickinson ISD

40.3%, 46.7%

Goose Creek CISD

48.1%, 55.5%

Sweeny ISD

15.6%, 20.2%

Hardin ISD

7.2%, 11.5%

Liberty ISD

22.9%, 27.7%

Dayton ISD

18.8%, 31.6%

Stafford MSD

37.5%, 42.5%

Santa Fe ISD

12.5%, 18.1%

Hempstead ISD

44.8%, 51.4%

Hull-Daisetta ISD

2.1%, 6.3%


1.1%, 3%

Damon ISD

40.3%, 43%

Texas City ISD

36.1%, 42.2%

Humble ISD

23%, 30%

Bay City ISD

48.6%, 56.5%

Big Sandy ISD

2.8%, 5.4%

Boling ISD

42.5%, 49.7%

Aldine ISD

62.4%, 69.7%

Spring ISD

35.9%, 41.4%

Brazos ISD

38.5%, 48.5%

Splendora ISD

16.7%, 27.4%

Katy ISD

28%, 34.3%

Van Vleck ISD

20.3%, 28.6%

Shepherd ISD

16.4%, 24.4%

East Bernard ISD

27.8%, 28.6%

Tomball ISD

19.1%, 26.3%

Houston ISD

59.3%, 62.4%

Galena Park ISD

70.1%, 75.5%

Klein ISD

29.1%, 36.6%

Deer Park ISD

39.8%, 46.9%

El Campo ISD

52.5%, 58.4%

Sealy ISD

37.2%, 45.6%

New Caney ISD

32.5%, 46.2%

La Porte ISD

34.2%, 43.2%


5.5%, 6.6%

Wharton ISD

44.3%, 53.4%


35.2%, 42.8%

New Waverly ISD

7.5%, 12%

Pearland ISD

23.9%, 26.7%

Pasadena ISD

74.6%, 81.8%

Willis ISD

24.7%, 31.9%

Alief ISD

45.9%, 50.5%

Spring Branch ISD

53.1%, 58.3%

Conroe ISD

24.9%, 32.9%

Brazosport ISD

41.9%, 49.1%

Barbers Hill ISD

14.7%, 19.5%

Crosby ISD

20.1%, 29.1%

Cleveland ISD


4.2%, 6%

Huffman ISD

11.6%, 15.2%

Anahuac ISD

23.3%, 27%

Royal ISD

56%, 67.9%

Friendswood ISD

10%, 15%

Sheldon ISD

54.6%, 60.8%

Channelview ISD

64.5%, 74.4%

North Forest ISD

27.3%, 33.6%

Richards ISD

6%, 13.5%

Clear Creek ISD

18.6%, 26%

Livingston ISD

15.4%, 19.2%

Montgomery ISD

9.6%, 12%

Waller ISD

34.5%, 47.2%

Magnolia ISD

19.8%, 28%

Anderson-Shiro CISD

12.1%, 15.2%

Hitchcock ISD

29%, 26.9%

Fort Bend ISD

22.4%, 26.3%


21.5%, 26.5%

Danbury ISD

17.9%, 20.4%

Alvin ISD

42%, 44.6%

Angleton ISD

37.3%, 46.2%

Needville ISD

35.5%, 40.8%

Galveston ISD

41.1%, 45.9%

Lamar CISD

45.8%, 46.1%

Navasota ISD

34.9%, 45.1%

,��5��-��

C h a n g e i n t h e Pe r c e n t o f H i s p a n i c S t u d e n t s

�!"#$!%

�� !��"��#$��%�� %�� %�&��

�




Grimes

San Jacinto

Montgomery

Liberty

Waller

Harris

Cha

Fort Bend

arton

Brazoria

Galveston

Matagorda

Hardi

La Marque ISD

0.3%, 0.2%

Devers ISD

0%, 1.1%

Dickinson ISD

3.6%, 2.7%

Goose Creek CISD

1.2%, 1.3%

Sweeny ISD

0.4%, 0.3%

Hardin ISD

0.2%, 0.2%

Liberty ISD

0.7%, 0.6%

Dayton ISD

0.4%, 0.3%

Stafford MSD

15.6%, 10%

Santa Fe ISD

0.3%, 0.5%

Hempstead ISD

0.7%, 0.7%

Hull-Daisetta ISD

0%, 0.4%


0.2%, 0%

Damon ISD

0%, 1.1%

Texas City ISD

0.4%, 0.4%

Humble ISD

3.3%, 3%

Bay City ISD

0.9%, 0.7%

Big Sandy ISD

0.2%, 0.4%

Boling ISD

0.2%, 0.2%

Aldine ISD

1.9%, 1.4%

Spring ISD

4.8%, 4.1%

Brazos ISD

0.4%, 0.7%

Splendora ISD

0.2%, 0.1%

Katy ISD

9%, 11.1%

Van Vleck ISD

0%, 0.2%

Shepherd ISD

0.9%, 0.8%

East Bernard ISD

0.2%, 0.2%

Tomball ISD

3.5%, 5%

Houston ISD

3.1%, 3.3%

Galena Park ISD

1.3%, 0.8%

Klein ISD

8.4%, 8.4%

Deer Park ISD

2.2%, 1.5%

El Campo ISD

0.3%, 0.2%

Sealy ISD

0.5%, 0.4%

New Caney ISD

1.3%, 1.5%

La Porte ISD

1.3%, 1.1%


0.5%, 0.4%

Wharton ISD

1.1%, 0.5%


8.5%, 8.1%

New Waverly ISD

0.1%, 0.2%

Pearland ISD

9.5%, 9.7%

Pasadena ISD

3.2%, 2.8%

Willis ISD

0.9%, 0.7%

Alief ISD

12.4%, 12.7%

Spring Branch ISD

5.9%, 6.1%

Conroe ISD

3%, 3.1%

Brazosport ISD

1.7%, 1.5%

Barbers Hill ISD

0.7%, 0.8%

Crosby ISD

0.5%, 0.3%

Cleveland ISD


0%, 0.1%

Huffman ISD

0.8%, 0.5%

Anahuac ISD

1.4%, 2.3%

Royal ISD

0.4%, 0.1%

Friendswood ISD

4.1%, 5.2%

Sheldon ISD

0.5%, 0.5%

Channelview ISD

1.5%, 1.1%

North Forest ISD

0.1%, 0.1%

Richards ISD

0%, 1.5%

Clear Creek ISD

9.8%, 9.7%

Livingston ISD

0.8%, 0.6%

Montgomery ISD

0.9%, 1.1%

Waller ISD

0.7%, 0.6%

Magnolia ISD

0.4%, 0.6%

Anderson-Shiro CISD

0%, 0.3%

Hitchcock ISD

0.5%, 0.3%

Fort Bend ISD

19.7%, 21.7%


0.6%, 0.5%

Danbury ISD

0%, 0.3%

Alvin ISD

4.2%, 7.9%

Angleton ISD

0.7%, 0.6%

Needville ISD

0.6%, 0.6%

Galveston ISD

2.4%, 2.3%

Lamar CISD

4.1%, 5.4%

Brenham ISD

1.5%, 1.5%

Navasota ISD

0.2%, 0.2%

,��5��-��

C h a n g e i n t h e Pe r c e n t o f A s i a n S t u d e n t s

�!"#$!%

�� !��"��#$��%�� %�� %�&��

�




Grimes

San Jacinto

Montgomery

Liberty

Waller

Harris

Cha

Fort Bend

arton

Brazoria

Galveston

Matagorda

Hardi

La Marque ISD

12.7%, 8%

Devers ISD

61%, 74.2%

Dickinson ISD

41.1%, 33%

Goose Creek CISD

30.7%, 24.9%

Sweeny ISD

65.5%, 59.7%

Hardin ISD

88.6%, 82.2%

Liberty ISD

55.2%, 50.4%

Dayton ISD

70.2%, 57.1%

Stafford MSD

12%, 5.5%

Santa Fe ISD

86.4%, 79.1%

Hempstead ISD

23.4%, 19.2%

Hull-Daisetta ISD

78%, 76.1%


97.2%, 94.9%

Damon ISD

59.7%, 50.5%

Texas City ISD

42.8%, 36%

Humble ISD

56.8%, 46.3%

Bay City ISD

32.8%, 25%

Big Sandy ISD

70.6%, 69.6%

Boling ISD

43.1%, 37.8%

Aldine ISD

4.2%, 2.1%

Spring ISD

20.6%, 12.9%

Brazos ISD

46%, 39.6%

Splendora ISD

81.7%, 70.7%

Katy ISD

53.5%, 42.3%

Van Vleck ISD

59.9%, 54.8%

Shepherd ISD

73.3%, 68%

East Bernard ISD

64.3%, 64.3%

Tomball ISD

70.2%, 60.3%

Houston ISD

8.3%, 8.1%

Galena Park ISD

7.7%, 5.7%

Klein ISD

46.4%, 37.7%

Deer Park ISD

55.5%, 46.7%

El Campo ISD

32.8%, 27.7%

Sealy ISD

48.2%, 41.9%

New Caney ISD

62.9%, 47.4%

La Porte ISD

55.3%, 45.6%


69.3%, 67.1%

Wharton ISD

24.5%, 17.4%


41.4%, 30%

New Waverly ISD

66%, 62%

Pearland ISD

49.6%, 43.9%

Pasadena ISD

14.2%, 7.9%

Willis ISD

64.6%, 56.4%

Alief ISD

4.4%, 3.6%

Spring Branch ISD

33.2%, 28.2%

Conroe ISD

65%, 54.6%

Brazosport ISD

45.9%, 38.9%

Barbers Hill ISD

80.8%, 74.2%

Crosby ISD

57.2%, 49.4%

Cleveland ISD


94.3%, 91.7%

Huffman ISD

85.4%, 80.2%

Anahuac ISD

55.2%, 50.8%

Royal ISD

15.2%, 9.4%

Huntsville ISD

48.5%, 42.8%

Friendswood ISD

83.5%, 75.7%

Sheldon ISD

18%, 12.8%

Channelview ISD

18.4%, 10.5%North Forest ISD

0.8%, 0.8%

Clear Creek ISD

62.3%, 52.3%

Livingston ISD

70.1%, 66%

Montgomery ISD

83.6%, 81.3%

Waller ISD

49%, 38.4%

Magnolia ISD

76.3%, 66.9%

Anderson-Shiro CISD

73.7%, 73.9%

Hitchcock ISD

35.5%, 28%

Fort Bend ISD

25.5%, 19.5%


62.7%, 58.2%

Danbury ISD

81.2%, 74%

Alvin ISD

44.5%, 32.1%

Angleton ISD

45.8%, 39%

Needville ISD

58.4%, 53%

Galveston ISD

25.5%, 25%

Lamar CISD

32.5%, 28.6%

Navasota ISD

35.5%, 27.8%

,��5��-��

C h a n g e i n t h e Pe r c e n t o f A n g l o S t u d e n t s

�!"#$!%

�� !��"��#$��%�� %�� %�&��

�




Klein�ISD�Employment�Sector(Out�of�Civilian�Employed�Population�16�Years�and�Over)

Klein ISD Population: 244,001Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over: 113,729

Industry % EmployedAgriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining 3.7Construction 7.2Manufacturing 15.4Wholesale Trade 5.9Retail Trade 9.2Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 5.5Information 0.8

Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing 7.1Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative and waste management services 10.0

Educational services, and health care and social assistance 19.1Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accomodation, and food services 5.6Other services, except public administration 7.2Public Administration 3.4

Klein ISD Employment Sector (Out of Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over)

Employed Population: 113,729 (out of 244,001 Total Residents in KISD)As Reported by 2011 American Community Survey Data

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining

4%

Construction7%

Manufacturing15%

Wholesale Trade6%

Retail Trade9%

Transportation and warehousing, and utilities

5%Information1%

Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and

leasing8%

Professional, scientific, and management, and

administrative and waste management services

10%

Educational services, and health care and social

assistance20%

Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and

accomodation, and food services

6%

Other services, except public administration

7%

Public Administration3%


Local�Employment�TrendsKlein�I.S.D.

August August Percent2011 2012 Change

City of Houston Employment 929,934 965,199 3.79% Unemployment Rate 8.6 7.1

Harris County Employment 1,882,372 1,953,753 3.79% Unemployment Rate 8.5 7

February August Percent2012 2012 Change

City of Houston Employment 948,092 965,199 1.80% Unemployment Rate 7.3 7.1

Harris County Employment 1,919,127 1,953,753 1.80% Unemployment Rate 7.3 7

Six-Month Employment Trends

Annual Employment Trends


Tren

ds�in

�Priva

te�Sch

ool�E

nrollm

ent

Klein�I.S.D.

Scho

olA

ddre

ssG

rade

s

% o

f St

uden

tsfr

om K

ISD

Cur

rent

Enro

llmen

t

Estim

ated

Stud

ents

from

KIS

D

% o

f en

rollm

ent

that

are

K

N+

Estim

ate

dSt

uden

tsfr

omK

ISD

in

Enro

llmen

tin

5 y

rs.

Estim

ated

Stud

ents

from

KIS

D

% o

f en

rollm

ent

that

are

K

N+

Estim

ated

Stud

ents

from

KIS

D in

K

N+

Abe

rcro

mbi

e A

cade

my

1710

2 Th

eiss

Mai

l R

oute

Rd.

, Spr

ing,

TX

PK

-5th

98%

130

127

62%

7917

517

262

%10

6

Abi

ding

Wor

d Lu

ther

an S

choo

l17

123

Red

Oak

Dr.,

H

oust

on, T

XK

-8th

50%

114

5710

0%57

150

7510

0%75

App

le G

rove

Sch

ool

1681

6Th

eiss

Mai

lR

oute

Rd.

, Spr

ing,

TX

Inf-T

oddl

ers,

AS

0%0

00%

00

00%

0

App

le T

ree

Sch

ool

1712

7 R

ed O

ak D

r.,

Hou

ston

, TX

PK

-2nd

50%

110

5518

%10

110

5518

%10

Ban

ff S

choo

l at C

ham

pion

s13

726

Cut

ten

Rd.

, H

oust

on, T

XP

K 3

- 12

th45

%12

858

90%

5215

068

90%

61

Cha

mpi

ons

Chr

istia

n A

cade

my

2113

Cyp

ress

Land

ing

Dr.,

H

oust

on,T

XIn

f - 6

th33

%17

056

41%

2320

066

41%

27

Chi

ldre

n of

The

Woo

dlan

ds22

00La

keW

oodl

ands

Dr.,

The

W

oodl

ands

,TX

18m

os-2

nd1%

487

515

%1

510

7715

%11

Xpl

or (f

orm

erly

Chi

ldre

n's

Cou

rtyar

d)86

15 W

. Ray

ford

R

d., S

prin

g, T

XIn

f-K5%

145

70%

015

00

0%0

Chr

ist C

omm

unity

Sch

ool

1488

Wel

lman

Rd.

, C

onro

e, T

X2y

r-6t

h3%

177

563

%3

300

189

63%

119

Con

cord

ia L

uthe

ran

700

E. M

ain

St.,

To

mba

ll, T

X9t

h-12

th25

%45

511

410

0%11

447

511

910

0%11

9

Cun

ae In

tern

atio

nal S

choo

l25

823

Gos

ling

Rd.

, S

prin

g, T

XP

K -

12th

0%61

073

%0

200

073

%0

Esp

rit In

tern

atio

nal S

choo

l48

90 W

est P

anth

er

Cre

ek D

r., T

he

Woo

dlan

ds, T

XTo

ddle

r-11

th0%

00

0%0

00

0%0

Firs

t Bap

tist A

cade

my

600

N M

ain,

C

onro

e, T

XTo

dd-K

0%10

00

10%

011

50

10%

0

Firs

t Bap

tist C

hild

Dev

elop

men

t C

ente

r

1180

1G

roga

nsM

illR

d., T

he

Woo

dlan

ds,T

X6w

ks-K

0%15

00

6%0

200

06%

0

Fras

sati

Cat

holic

Hig

h S

choo

lP

.O. B

ox 1

3164

5,

Spr

ing,

TX

9th-

12th

Gra

nt R

oad

Day

Car

e C

ente

r95

14 G

rant

Rd.

, H

oust

on, T

XP

K -

K0%

00

0%0

00

0%0

Gre

enga

te A

cade

my

1849

0 K

uyke

ndah

l R

d., S

prin

g, T

XK

-1st

95%

150

143

100%

143

250

238

100%

238

Gre

enw

ood

Chr

istia

n S

choo

l12

135

Mig

hty

Oak

D

r., H

oust

on, T

XP

K -

1st

100%

100

100

12%

1210

010

012

%12

Gre

ysto

ne H

ouse

Mon

tess

ori

1000

Eve

rgre

enC

ir., T

he

Woo

dlan

ds,T

XIn

f-K0%

750

8%0

750

8%0

Cur

rent

Enr

ollm

ent

Proj

ecte

d En

rollm

ent i

n 5

Year

s

Sch

ools

list

ed in

ital

ics

are

out

side

the

KIS

D b

ound

arie

sS

choo

ls h

ighl

ight

ed in

gre

en a

re n

ot in

clud

ed in

tota

l


Tren

ds�in

�Priva

te�Sch

ool�E

nrollm

ent

Klein�I.S.D.

Scho

olA

ddre

ssG

rade

s

% o

f St

uden

tsfr

om K

ISD

Cur

rent

Enro

llmen

t

Estim

ated

Stud

ents

from

KIS

D

% o

f en

rollm

ent

that

are

K

N+

Estim

ate

dSt

uden

tsfr

omK

ISD

in

Enro

llmen

tin

5 y

rs.

Estim

ated

Stud

ents

from

KIS

D

% o

f en

rollm

ent

that

are

K

N+

Estim

ated

Stud

ents

from

KIS

D in

K

N+

Cur

rent

Enr

ollm

ent

Proj

ecte

d En

rollm

ent i

n 5

Year

s

Gre

ysto

ne H

ouse

Mon

tess

ori

1771

0S

Cyp

ress

Vill

as D

r., S

prin

g,

TXIn

f-K75

%75

5613

%7

7556

13%

7

Hor

izon

s E

duca

tion

Cen

ter

8320

Lou

etta

Rd.

, S

prin

g, T

X1s

t-10t

h30

%45

1410

0%14

5517

100%

17

Hou

ston

Lea

rnin

g A

cade

my

Nor

th13

029

Cha

mpi

ons

Dr.,

Hou

ston

, TX

9th

- 12t

h50

%17

910

0%9

6030

100%

30

Lake

woo

d M

onte

ssor

i Sch

ool

1212

7M

alco

lmso

nR

d. O

R

Loue

tta

Rd.

PK

-KN

10%

279

2813

%4

279

2813

%4

Lang

try P

repa

rato

ry A

cade

my

200

Nob

le S

t.,

Spr

ing,

TX

9th

- 12t

h17

%6

110

0%1

102

100%

2

Ligh

t Way

Sch

ools

5125

Sha

dow

Ben

d P

lace

, The

W

oodl

ands

, TX

0%0

0%0

00

0%0

Ligh

thou

se C

hris

tian

Aca

dem

y22

703

Ald

ine

Wes

tfiel

d R

d.,

Spr

ing,

TXK

-12t

h0%

00%

00

00%

0

Lind

er L

earn

ing

Land

14

600

Gla

debr

ook

Dr.,

Hou

ston

, TX

6wks

-PK

0%0

00%

00

00%

0

Mon

tess

ori C

hild

Car

e - S

prin

g /

Kle

in18

026

Stra

ck D

r.,

Spr

ing,

TX

18 M

o - P

K0%

00

0%0

00

0%0

New

Mon

tess

ori H

ouse

of

Chi

ldre

n95

02 M

ills

Rd.

, H

oust

on, T

XP

K -

K0%

100

40%

020

040

%0

Nor

th H

oust

on C

atho

lic H

igh

Sch

ool

(will

ope

n in

Aug

ust 2

013)

P.O

. Box

131

645,

S

prin

g, T

X9t

h-12

th0%

00

0%0

00

0%0

Nor

thla

nd C

hris

tian

Aca

dem

y43

63 S

ylva

nfei

ld

Dr.,

Hou

ston

, TX

6th-

12th

95%

340

323

100%

323

400

380

100%

380

Nor

thla

nd C

hris

tian

Aca

dem

y-E

lem

enta

ry27

00 F

M 1

960,

H

oust

on, T

XK

- 5t

h95

%20

519

510

0%19

525

023

810

0%23

8

Nor

thw

ood

Mon

tess

ori S

choo

l14

901

Wel

com

e La

ne, H

oust

on, T

XP

K-1

st80

%49

39.2

37%

1576

6137

%22

Nor

thw

oods

Cat

holic

Sch

ool

5500

FM

292

0 R

d.,

Spr

ing,

TX

PK

- 8t

h60

%21

012

687

%11

030

018

087

%15

7

Oak

Rid

ge C

hris

tian

Aca

dem

y27

420

Rob

inso

n R

d., C

onro

e, T

XP

K-1

2th

0%12

00

25%

015

00

25%

0

Oak

dale

Priv

ate

Sch

ool

1444

FM

196

0 W

., H

oust

on, T

X6w

ks-

2nd

0%53

60

5%0

600

05%

0

PC

AL

Chr

istia

n S

choo

l92

68 S

tate

Hig

hway

24

2, C

onro

e, T

X0%

00%

00

00%

0

Vic

tory

Chr

istia

n S

choo

l (fo

rmer

ly P

arkw

ay C

hris

tian)

2520

6 P

iney

H

eigh

ts L

n. S

prin

g,

TX9t

h - 1

2th

0%55

010

0%0

100

010

0%0

Sch

ools

list

ed in

ital

ics

are

out

side

the

KIS

D b

ound

arie

sS

choo

ls h

ighl

ight

ed in

gre

en a

re n

ot in

clud

ed in

tota

l


Tren

ds�in

�Priva

te�Sch

ool�E

nrollm

ent

Klein�I.S.D.

Scho

olA

ddre

ssG

rade

s

% o

f St

uden

tsfr

om K

ISD

Cur

rent

Enro

llmen

t

Estim

ated

Stud

ents

from

KIS

D

% o

f en

rollm

ent

that

are

K

N+

Estim

ate

dSt

uden

tsfr

omK

ISD

in

Enro

llmen

tin

5 y

rs.

Estim

ated

Stud

ents

from

KIS

D

% o

f en

rollm

ent

that

are

K

N+

Estim

ated

Stud

ents

from

KIS

D in

K

N+

Cur

rent

Enr

ollm

ent

Proj

ecte

d En

rollm

ent i

n 5

Year

s

Prim

rose

Sch

ool o

f Cha

mpi

ons

1681

1S

hado

wV

alle

y D

r., S

prin

g,

TXP

K0%

00

0%0

00

0%0

Prim

rose

Sch

ool o

f Im

peria

l O

aks

2114

Ray

ford

Rd.

, S

prin

g, T

XIn

f-KN

0%21

50

12%

00

012

%0

Prim

rose

Sch

ool o

f Spr

ing

- K

lein

2200

3 B

ridge

ston

e Ln

., S

prin

g, T

XIn

f - K

N10

0%18

018

011

%20

210

210

11%

23

Prim

rose

Sch

ool o

f The

W

oodl

ands

6403

Col

lege

Par

kD

r., T

he

Woo

dlan

ds,T

XIn

f-1st

0%12

70

20%

020

00

20%

0

Prim

rose

Sch

ool o

f The

W

oodl

ands

6909

Lake

Woo

dlan

ds D

r., T

he

Woo

dlan

ds,T

XIn

f-K0%

215

07%

025

00

7%0

Pro

gres

sive

Mon

tess

ori S

choo

l20

50 L

ouet

ta R

d.,

Spr

ing,

TX

Inf -

KN

5%72

48%

010

05

8%0

Pro

vide

nce

Cla

ssic

al S

choo

l60

06S

prin

gC

ypre

ss R

d.,

Spr

ing,

TXP

K-1

2th

70%

334

234

97%

227

400

280

97%

272

Red

d S

choo

l 48

20 S

track

Rd.

, H

oust

on, T

XP

K-8

th0%

175

080

%0

250

080

%0

Res

urre

ctio

n Lu

ther

an16

12 M

eado

w E

dge

Ln.,

Spr

ing,

TX

Inf -

PK

0%0

00%

00

00%

0

Ros

a's

Sch

ool

1207

Dol

ly W

right

S

t., H

oust

on, T

XK

- 6t

h0%

00

100%

00

010

0%0

Ros

ehill

Chr

istia

n S

choo

l19

830

FM 2

920

Rd.

, Tom

ball,

TX

PK

-12t

h30

%37

611

387

%98

550

165

87%

144

Sal

em L

uthe

ran

Sch

ool

2260

1Lu

ther

anC

hurc

h R

d.,

Tom

ball,

TXK

-8th

5%47

024

100%

2450

025

100%

25

Sha

dy A

cres

Chr

istia

n S

choo

l73

30 V

ogel

Rd.

, H

oust

on, T

X1s

t - 1

2th

10%

394

100%

460

610

0%6

Spe

ll W

ell S

choo

l17

502

W S

track

D

r., S

prin

g, T

XIn

f - 5

th0%

150

020

%0

175

020

%0

Spr

ing

Bap

tist E

arly

Lea

rnin

g C

ente

r

1027

Spr

ing

Cyp

ress

Rd.

, S

prin

g,TX

PK

-3rd

45%

9041

44%

1815

068

44%

30

Spr

ing

Cyp

ress

Pre

sbyt

eria

n S

choo

l

6000

Spr

ing

Cyp

ress

Rd.

, S

prin

g,TX

PK

0%0

00%

00

00%

0

St.

Ann

e C

atho

lic S

choo

l 11

11 S

Che

rry

St.,

To

mba

ll, T

XP

K -

8th

25%

385

9665

%63

400

100

65%

65

St.

Ant

hony

of P

adua

Cat

holic

S

choo

l

7901

Bay

Bra

nch

Dr.,

The

W

oodl

ands

,TX

PK

-8th

0%48

90

86%

050

80

86%

0

St.

Edw

ards

Cat

holic

Sch

ool

2601

Spr

ing

Stu

ebne

r, S

prin

g,

TXP

K-8

th85

%31

726

988

%23

733

028

188

%24

7

Ste

p by

Ste

p C

hris

tian

Sch

ool

1119

S C

herr

y S

t.,

Tom

ball,

TX

Inf-8

th25

%17

544

43%

1920

050

43%

22

Sch

ools

list

ed in

ital

ics

are

out

side

the

KIS

D b

ound

arie

sS

choo

ls h

ighl

ight

ed in

gre

en a

re n

ot in

clud

ed in

tota

l


Tren

ds�in

�Priva

te�Sch

ool�E

nrollm

ent

Klein�I.S.D.

Scho

olA

ddre

ssG

rade

s

% o

f St

uden

tsfr

om K

ISD

Cur

rent

Enro

llmen

t

Estim

ated

Stud

ents

from

KIS

D

% o

f en

rollm

ent

that

are

K

N+

Estim

ate

dSt

uden

tsfr

omK

ISD

in

Enro

llmen

tin

5 y

rs.

Estim

ated

Stud

ents

from

KIS

D

% o

f en

rollm

ent

that

are

K

N+

Estim

ated

Stud

ents

from

KIS

D in

K

N+

Cur

rent

Enr

ollm

ent

Proj

ecte

d En

rollm

ent i

n 5

Year

s

Ste

ppin

g S

tone

s Fa

mily

Res

ourc

e an

d C

hild

Dev

elop

men

t

1190

0C

rane

broo

kD

r., T

he

Woo

dlan

ds,T

XIn

f-1st

0%15

20

17%

020

00

17%

0

Sum

mer

field

Aca

dem

y 21

611

Brid

gest

one

Ln.,

Spr

ing,

TX

PK

0%0

00%

00

00%

0

Texa

s M

onte

ssor

i Aca

dem

y11

826

Loue

tta R

d.,

Hou

ston

, TX

PK

-KN

0%0

00%

00

00%

0

The

Chi

ldre

n's

Cou

rtyar

d 91

44 L

ouet

ta,

Spr

ing,

TX

Inf-1

st95

%20

119

149

%94

250

238

49%

116

The

Chi

ldre

n's

Cou

rtyar

d 10

505

Six

Pin

esD

r., T

he

Woo

dlan

ds,T

XIn

f-1st

0%19

00

37%

022

00

37%

0

The

God

dard

Sch

ool

8727

Eas

tloch

Dr,

Spr

ing,

TX

Inf-P

K0%

00

0%0

00

0%0

The

God

dard

Sch

ool

8522

Prin

ceto

n P

l.,

Tom

ball,

TX

Inf-P

K0%

00

0%0

00

0%0

The

Hon

ey T

ree

1862

9S

tate

Hig

hway

249

, H

oust

on,T

XIn

f - P

K0%

00

0%0

00

0%0

The

John

Coo

per S

choo

l1

John

Coo

per D

r.,

The

Woo

dlan

ds, T

XP

K-1

2th

0%10

321

96%

01,

200

196

%1

The

Rub

icon

Aca

dem

y14

211

Hor

sesh

oeB

end,

The

W

oodl

ands

,TX

PK

-10t

h0%

300

80%

030

080

%0

The

Sch

ool o

f Am

azin

g Li

ttle

Min

ds

2322

1A

ldin

eW

estfi

eld

Rd.

, S

prin

g,TX

PK

-K0%

00

0%0

00

0%0

The

Woo

dlan

ds M

onte

ssor

i12

01M

any

Pin

esR

d., T

he

Woo

dlan

ds,T

XTo

ddle

r-K

0%85

05%

010

40

5%0

The

Woo

dlan

ds S

choo

l for

Y

oung

Sch

olar

s

2516

2G

roga

nsP

ark

Dr.,

The

W

oodl

ands

,TX

PK

-2nd

0%0

00%

00

00%

0

Trin

ity L

uthe

ran

Sch

ool

1892

6 K

lein

Chu

rch

Rd.

, Spr

ing,

TX

MD

O-8

th0%

696

078

%0

750

078

%0

Woo

dlan

ds A

cade

my

Pre

para

tory

Sch

ool

2744

0 K

uyke

ndah

l R

d., S

prin

g, T

XK

N-1

2th

1%32

53

100%

350

05

100%

5

Woo

dlan

ds C

hris

tian

Aca

dem

y58

00 A

lden

Woo

ds,

Con

roe,

TX

PK

-12t

h0%

392

094

%0

900

094

%0

Woo

ds P

rivat

e S

choo

l15

002

Lake

woo

dFo

rest

Dr.,

Hou

ston

, TX

2yrs

-3rd

33%

370

122

32%

3940

013

232

%42

TOTA

L:11

,781

2,84

22,

014

14,3

723,

712

2,63

1

Dis

tric

t Enr

ollm

ent:

46,9

4252

,358

Ove

rall

perc

enta

ge o

f stu

dent

s fr

om K

ISD

in p

rivat

e sc

hool

s:4.

11%

4.78

%

Sch

ools

list

ed in

ital

ics

are

out

side

the

KIS

D b

ound

arie

sS

choo

ls h

ighl

ight

ed in

gre

en a

re n

ot in

clud

ed in

tota

l


Documents

Klein Report Text - SEPTEMBER 2012 - Home - Klein ISD · Humble ISD 91.27 Aldine ISD 108.99 Spring ISD 55.55 Splendora ISD 74.21 Katy ISD 171.91 Tomball ISD 82.88 Houston ISD 300.5