Kinetic Quantum Theory of Gravity Fran De Aquino

Maranhao State University, Physics Department, S.Luis/MA, Brazil.Copyright 2002-2004 by Fran De Aquino

All Rights Reserved

Gravity is here quantized starting from the generalization of the action function. This leads toan equation of correlation between gravitational and inertial masses, which depends on theparticle's kinetic energy. We show that there is a reaffirmation of the strong equivalenceprinciple and consequently the Einstein's equations are preserved. In fact such equationsare deduced here directly from this kinetic approach to Gravity. Moreover, we have obtaineda generalized equation for inertial forces, which incorporates the Mach's principle intoGravitation. Also, we have deduced the equation of Entropy; the Hamiltonian for a particle inan electromagnetic field and the reciprocal fine structure constant. It is possible to deducethe expression of the Casimir force and also to explain the Inflation Period and the MissingMatter without assuming the existence of vacuum fluctuations. This new approach forGravity will allow us to understand some crucial matters in Cosmology.

1. INTRODUCTION

Quantum Gravity was originally studied, byDirac and others, as the problem ofquantizing General Relativity. Thisapproach has many difficulties, detailed byIsham [1]. In the 1970's physicists tried aneven more conventional approach: simplifythe Einstein's equations by pretending thatthey are almost linear, and then apply thestandard methods of quantum field theoryto the thus-oversimplified equations. Butthis method, too, failed. In the 1980's avery different approach, known as stringtheory, became popular. For a while thereare many enthusiasts of string theory.But the mathematical difficulties instring theory are formidable, and it is farfrom clear that they will be resolved anytime soon. At the end of 1997 Isham [2]pointed out several "Structural ProblemsFacing Quantum Gravity Theory". At thebeginning of this new century, theproblem of quantizing the gravitationalfield was still open. In this work we propose a newapproach to Quantum Gravity where

gravity is quantized starting from thegeneralization of the action function for aparticle. The Einstein's equations of theGeneral Relativity are deduced directlyfrom this theory of Quantum Gravity. Also,it leads to a complete description of theElectromagnetic Field, providing aconsistent unification of gravity withelectromagnetism.

2. THEORY

We start with the action for a free-particle that, as we know, is given by:

∫−=b

adsS α

where α is a quantity whichcharacterize the particle, and must bealways positive for all the particles. In Relativistic Mechanics, the action

2can be written in the following form [3]:

dtcVcLdtSt

t

t

t∫ ∫ −−== 2

1

2

1

221α

where221 cVcL −−= α

is the Lagrange's function. In Classical Mechanics theLagrange's function for a free-particle is,as we know, given by: 2aVL = where Vis the speed of the particle and a aquantity hypothetically [4] given by :

2ma =where m is the mass of the particle.However, there is no distinction about thekind of mass ( if gravitational mass, gm , or

inertial mass im ) neither about its sign( )± .

The correlation between a and αcan be established based on the fact thaton the limit ∞→c the relativisticexpression for L must be reduced to theclassic expression 2aVL = . The result [5]

is : cVL 22α= . Therefore, if ac2=α we

obtain 2aVL = . Since α must be always positive,the quantity ca 2α= must also bealways positive. Hence, a rigorousmathematical definition of a must be

expressed as a function of m instead of

m . Moreover, we must decide if gmm =or imm = . We will see in this work that

the definition of gm includes im . Thus the

right option is gm , i.e.,

.ma g 2=

Consequently, cmg=α and the

generalized expression for the action for afree-particle will have the following form:

( )1∫−=b

ag dscmS

or

( )212

1

2

1

222 ∫∫ =−−=t

t

t

t g LdtdtcVcmS

where the Lagrange's function is

( )31 222 .cVcmL g −−= The momentum, as we know, is the

vector VLp

∂∂= . Thus from the Eq.(3)we obtain:

( )41 22

.VMcV

Vmp g

g =

−=

The derivate dtpd

is the inertial

force iF which acts on the particle. If the

force is perpendicular to the speed wehave

( )51 22

.dt

Vd

cV

mF

g

i

−

=

However, if the force and the speed havethe same direction, we find that

( ) ( )61 2

322

.dt

Vd

cV

mF

g

i

−

=

From Mechanics [6] we know that

LVp −⋅

denotes the energy of theparticle, thus we can write

( )71

2

22

2

.cMcV

cmLVpE g

g

g =−

=−⋅=

This fundamental equation presents theconcept of Gravitational Energy, gE , in

addition to the well-known concept ofInertial Energy, iE , and shows that gE is

not null for 0=V , but it has the finite value

( )8200 cmE gg =

This is the particle's gravitational energyat rest. The Eq.(7) can be rewritten in thefollowing form:

( ) ( )9

1

1

00

0

2022

202

00

2

22

2

2

ii

g

Kiii

g

E

ii

ii

g

g

g

gg

Em

mEE

m

m

cmcV

cmcm

m

m

cmcV

cmcmE

Ki

=+=

=

−

−+=

=−−

+=

By analogy to the Eq.(8), 200 cmE ii = into the

equation above, is the inertial energyat rest. Thus, Kiii EEE += 0 is the total

inertial energy, where KiE is the kineticinertial energy. From the Eqs.(7) and (9)we thus obtain

3

( )101

2

22

20 .cM

cV

cmE i

ii =

−=

For small velocities ( )cV << , we obtain

( )11202

120 VmcmE iii +≈

where we recognize the classicalexpression for the kinetic inertial energy ofthe particle. The expression for the kineticgravitational energy, KgE , is easily

deduced by comparing of the Eqs.(7) and(9). The result is

( )120

.Em

mE Ki

i

g

Kg =

In the presented picture, we can saythat the gravity , g

, into a gravitational field

produced by a particle of gravitationalmass gm depends on the particle's

gravitational energy, gE ( given by Eq.(7)),

because we can write

( )13222

2

22 r

MG

cr

cMG

cr

EGg

ggg −=−=−=

where ( ) 21

221−

−= cVmM gg is the

relativistic gravitational mass defined inthe Eqs.(4)and (7). On the other hand, as we know, thegravitational force is conservative. Thus,gravitational energy, in agreement with theenergy conservation law, can beexpressed by the decrease of the inertialenergy, i.e.,

( )14ig EE ∆∆ −=This equation expresses the fact that thedecrease of gravitational energycorresponds to an increase of the inertialenergy. Therefore a variation iE∆ in iE

yields a variation ig EE ∆∆ −= in gE . Thus

iii EEE ∆+= 0 ; igggg EEEEE ∆∆ −=+= 00 and

( )1500 igig EEEE +=+Comparison between (7) and (10) showsthat 00 ig EE = . Consequently we have

( )162 000 iigig EEEEE =+=+However, Kiii EEE += 0 .Thus (16) becomes

( )170 .EEE Kiig −=Note the symmetry in the equations of

iE and gE .Substitution of Kiii EEE −=0

into (17) yields( )182 Kigi EEE =−

Squaring the Eqs.(4) and (7) andcomparing the result, we find the followingcorrelation between gravitational energyand momentum :

( )192222

2

.cmpc

Eg

g +=

The energy expressed as a function of themomentum is, as we know, calledHamiltonian or Hamilton's function:

( )20222 .cmpcH gg += It is known that starting from theSchrödinger equation we may obtain thewell-known expression for energy of aparticle in periodic motion inside a cubicalbox of edge length L [ 7 ]. The resultnow is

( )213218 2

22

,...,,nLM

hnE

g

n ==

This is the total energy of theparticle inside the box. Equation (7) is theexpression for the total energy of theparticle. Comparison between (7) and (21)leads to

( )228cL

nhM g =

From this equation we conclude thatthere is a minimum value for gM

given by

( ) ( )238max

mingcL

hM =

where maxL is the maximum edgelength of a cubical box whosemaximum diameter

( )243maxmax Ld =is equal to the maximum "diameter" ofthe Universe. The relativistic gravitational

mass ( ) 21

221−

−= cVmM gg , defined

in the Eqs.(4) and (7), shows that

( ) ( ) ( )250 mingming mM =

4 The box normalization leads toconclusion that the propagation

number λπ2== kk

is restricted to

the values Lnk π2= . This isdeduced assuming an arbitrarily largebut finite cubical box of volume 3L [8].

Thus we haveλnL =

From this equation we conclude that

min

maxmax

Ln

λ=

and

minminminmin nL λλ ==Since 1=minn . Therefore we can writethat

( )26minmaxmax LnL =From this equation we thus concludethat

( )27minnLL =or

( )28n

LL max=

Multiplying (27) and (28) by 3 and

reminding that 3Ld = , we obtain

( )29n

ddorndd max

min ==

Equations above show that the length(and therefore the space) is quantized. From (22) we can also concludethat

( ) ( )308min

maxmaxg

cL

hnM =

Equation (26) tells us thatmaxmaxmin nLL = . Thus Eq.(30) can be

written as follows

( ) ( )318

2

max

maxmaxgcL

hnM =

Comparison of (31) with (23) showsthat

( ) ( ) ( )322mingmaxmaxg MnM =

Equation (25) shows that

( ) ( )mingming mM 0= . Thus we obtain

( ) ( )mingmaxmaxg mnM 02=

which leads to following conclusion

( ) ( )3302

mingg mnM =

This equation shows that thegravitational mass is quantized. Notethat the equation above does notpresents negative values for gM

because it has been derived from theEq.(21) for 0>gM . Further on it will

be shown that gM can be negative.

Thus for 0<gM Eq.(21) gives222 8 LMhnE gn −= whence we obtain

( )mingg mnM 02−= . Thus the complete

equation must be

( ) ( )3402

mingg mnM ±=

Substitution of (34) into (13) leads toquantization of gravity, i.e.,

( )

( )( )354

2

022

min

max

mingg

gn

nr

mGn

r

MGg

±=

=

−±=−=

From the Hubble's law followsthat

( )2maxmaxmax dH~

lH~

V ==

( )2minminmin dH~

lH~

V ==whence

min

max

min

max

d

d

V

V=

Equations (29) tell us thatmaxminmax ndd = . On the other hand we

know that cVmax = . Thus the equationabove gives

5

maxmin

n

cV =

which leads to following conclusion

( )36n

cV =

this equation shows that velocity isalso quantized. The temporal coordinate 0x ofthe space-time is ctx =0 . Substitutionof nVc = into this equation yields

( )372 101

n

t

n

H~

l

x

n

H~

t max==

=

−−

which shows the quantization of time. Now let us go back to Eq. (20)which will be called the gravitationalHamiltonian to distinguish it from theinertial Hamiltonian iH :

( )3822

02 .cmpcH ii +=

Consequently, the Eq. (18) can berewritten in the following form:

( )392 igi HHH ∆=−where iH∆ is the variation on theinertial Hamiltonian or inertial kineticenergy. A momentum variation p∆yields a variation iH∆ given by:

( ) ( )4042

02242

022 cmcpcmcppH iii +−++= ∆∆

Substituting Eqs.(20), (38) and (40)into (39) and making 0=p , we obtain

.cmcmcpcmcm iiig

−+=− 20

42

0222

02 2 ∆

From this equation we derive thegeneral expression of correlationbetween the gravitational and inertialmass, i.e.,

( )41112 0

2

00 .m

cm

pmm i

i

ig

−

+−= ∆

Note that for ( )250 cmp i>∆ the

value of gm becomes negative. Note

also that Eq.(41) gives similar resultsfor matter and anti-matter ( ii mm =− ).

Equation (41) can also beexpressed in terms of velocity V of

the particle. Starting from Eq.(4) wecan write:

( )( )( )

( ) 221 cVV

VVmmpp

gg

∆

∆∆∆

+−

+−=+

For 0=V ; 0=p . Thus the equationabove reduces to:

( ) ( )21 cVVmmp gg ∆∆∆∆ −−=From the Eq.(16) we obtain:

( ) iiiiiiig EEEEEEEE ∆∆ −=+−=−= 0000 22

However, Eq.(14) tells us that

gi EE ∆∆ =− ; it leads to gig EEE ∆+= 0 or

gig mmm ∆+= 0 . Thus, in the

expression of p∆ we can replace

( )gg mm ∆− by 0im , i.e.,

( )20 1 cVVmp i ∆∆∆ −=

We can therefore write

( )( )42

1 20 cV

cV

cm

p

i −=∆

By substitution of the expression aboveinto Eq.(41) we thus obtain:

( ) ( )43112 022

021

iig mcVmm

−−−=

−

For 0=V the Eq.(43) gives

00 igg mmm ==Therefore, the previously obtainedquantized relation (33), ( )mingg mnM 0

2= ,

becomes

( ) ( )4402

0 minii mnm =which shows the quantization of inertialmass. Finally, by dividing both

members of Eq.(43) by 221 cV− wereadily obtain

( ) ( )45112 21

22iig McVMM

−−−=

−

Henceforth, by simplicity the index zeroof 0im will be omitted. The Lorentz's force is usuallywritten in the following form:

6BVqEqdtPd

×+=

where 221 cVVmP i −=

. However,

Eq.(4) tell us that 221 cVVmp g −=

.

Therefore, the expressions abovemust be corrected by multiplying itsmembers by ig mm ,i.e.,

pcV

Vm

cV

Vm

m

m

m

mP

gi

i

g

i

g =

−=

−=

2222 11

and

( ) ( )46i

g

i

g

m

mBVqEq

m

mP

dt

d

dt

pd ×+=

=

That is now the general expression forLorentz's force. When the force is perpendicularto the speed, the Eq.(5) gives

( ) 221 cVdtVdmdtpd g −=

.By comparing

with Eq.(46) we thus obtain

( )( ) BVqEqdtVdcVmi

×+=− 221

Starting from this equation, well-known experiments have been carriedout in order to verify the relativistic

expression: 221 cVmi − . In particular, we can look on themomentum variation ( )p∆ as due toabsorption or emission ofelectromagnetic energy by the particle( by means of radiation and/or bymeans of Lorentz's force upon thecharge of the particle). In the case of radiation (anytype), p∆ can be obtained as follows. Itis known that the radiation pressure ,dP, upon an area dxdydA= of avolume dxdydzdV = of a particle ( theincident radiation normal to the surfacedA ) is equal to the energy dUabsorbed per unit volume ( )dVdU .i.e.,

( )47dAdz

dU

dxdydz

dU

dV

dUdP ===

Substitution of vdtdz = ( v is the

speed of radiation) into the equationabove gives

( ) ( )48v

dD

v

dAdtdU

dV

dUdP ===

Since dFdPdA = we can write:

( )49v

dUdFdt=

However we know that dtdpdF = , then

( )50v

dUdp =

From Eq.(48) follows that

( )51v

dVdDdPdVdU ==

Substitution into (50) yields

( )522v

dVdDdp =

or

∫ ∫∫ =D Vp

dVdDv

dp0 020

1∆

whence

( )532v

VDp =∆

This expression is general for all typesof waves. Including no-electromagneticwaves like sound waves. In this case,v in Eq.(53), will be the speed ofsound in the medium and D theintensity of the sound radiation. In the case of electromagneticwaves, the Electrodynamics tells usthat v will be given by

( )

++===

112

2ωεσµεκω

rrr

c

dt

dzv

Where rk is the real part of the

propagation vector k

; ir ikkkk +==

;

ε , µ and σ, are the electromagneticcharacteristics of the medium in whichthe incident (or emitted) radiation ispropagating ( 0εεε r= where rε is therelative dielectric permittivity and

mF /10854.8 120

−×=ε ; 0µµµ r= where

rµ is the relative magnetic permeability

and m/H70 104 −×= πµ ; σ is the

electrical conductivity). For an atominside a body , the incident(or emitted)

7radiation on this atom will bepropagating inside the body , andconsequently , σ=σbody , ε=εbody, µ=µbody. It is then evident that the indexof refraction vcnr = will be given by

( ) ( )54112

2

++== ωεσµε rrr v

cn

On the other hand, from Eq.(50)follows that

rnc

U

c

c

v

Up =

=∆

Substitution into Eq.(41) yields

( )551121

2

2 ir

i

g mncm

Um

î

−

+−=

For ωεσ >> , the expression (54) gives

( )564

2

f

c

v

cnr π

µσ==

Substitution of (56) into (55) leads to

i

i

g mcm

U

fm

î

−

+−= 1

4121

2

πµσ

This equation shows that atoms offerromagnetic materials with very-highµ can have its gravitational massesstrongly reduced by means ofExtremely Low Frequency (ELF)electromagnetic radiation. It alsoshows that atoms of superconductingmaterials (due to very-high σ ) canalso have its gravitational massesstrongly reduced by means of ELFelectromagnetic radiation. Alternatively, we may putEq.(55) as a function of the powerdensity ( or intensity ), D , of theradiation. The integration of (51) gives

vVDU = . Thus we can write (55) inthe following form:

( )5711212

3

2

ir

g mc

Dnm

î

−

+−=

ρ

where Vmi=ρ .

For ωεσ >> , rn will be given by(56) and consequently (57) becomes

( )5814

1212

ig mcf

Dm

î

−

+−=

ρπµσ

The vector ( )vVUD

= , which we maydefine from (48), has the samedirection of the propagation vector k

and evidently corresponds to thePoynting vector. Then D

can be

replaced by HE

× .Thus we can write( ) ( )[ ] ( ) 21 EvvEEBEEHD µµµ ==== .

For ωεσ >> the Eq.(54) tells us thatµσπfv 4= consequently we obtain

µπσf

ED4

2=

This expression refers to theinstantaneous values of D and E .The average value for 2E is equal to

22

1mE because E varies sinusoidaly

( mE is the maximum value for E ).Consequently equation above tells usthat the average density D is given by

µπσf

ED m 42

21=

Substitution of this expression into (58)yields the expression for gm .

Substitution of the expression of Dinto (58) gives

( ) ( ) ( )5914121 322ig mfcEm

î

−+−= πσρµ

Note that for extremely-low frequenciesthe value of 3−f in this equationbecomes highly expressive. Some oscillators like theHP3325A ( Op.002 High VoltageOutput ) can generate sinusoidalvoltages with extremely-lowfrequencies down to Hzf 6101 −×=and amplitude up to 20V. On the otherhand, there is a vinyl compoundcalled Duracap 86103 whosedensity is 31400 −= m.kgρ and theelectrical properties are: 3=rε ;

1=rµ ; mm/KV.strengthdieletric 498= ;m/S.393=σ (electrical conductivity).

8Then consider a HP3325A connectedto a capacitor whose dielectric is a diskof Duracap 86103 ( 5 mm thickness).When a sinusoidal voltage

ftsinVV map π2= , is applied at the

terminals of this capacitor, the electricfield E inside the dielectric is

l

VE

r

ap

ε=

where l is the thickness of thedielectric. Therefore, the gravitational massof the dielectric, ( )diegm , in agreement

with (59), is given by

( ) ( )[ ] ( )dieiapdieg mfV.m 11075121 3420 −×+−= −

where ( )dieim is the initial inertial mass

of the dielectric( Duracap disk). For HzHzf 6101 −== µ theequation above shows that thegravitational mass of the dielectricbecomes negative if V.Vap 12> ; for

V.Vap 72≅ , ( ) ( )dieidieg mm −≅ .

Let us now return to the theory. The equivalence betweenframes of non-inertial reference andgravitational fields presupposed

ig mm ≡ because the inertial forces

was given by amF ii

= , while the

equivalent gravitational forces,by gmF gg

= . Thus, to satisfy the

equivalence ( ga

≡ and gi FF ≡

) it was

necessary that ig mm ≡ . Now, the inertial

force, iF

, is given by Eq.(6), and from the

Eq.(13) we can obtain the gravitational

force, gF

. Thus, gi FF

≡ leads to

( ) ( )

( ) ( ) 23

23

23

22222

2222222

11

111

cV

mg

cV

m

r

mG

cV

m

cVr

mGa

cV

m

ggg

ggg

−≡

−

′

′≡

≡−−′

′≡

−

whence results

ga

≡

Consequently, the equivalence isevident, and therefore the Einstein'sequations from the General Relativitycontinue obviously valid. The new expression for iF

(Eqs.(5) and (6)) shows that the inertialforces are proportional to thegravitational mass, gm . This means

that these forces result from thegravitational interaction between theparticle and the other gravitationalmasses of the Universe, just asMach’s principle predicts. Thereforethe new expression for the inertialforces incorporates the Mach’sprinciple into Gravitation Theory, andfurthermore reveals that the inertialeffects upon a particle can be reducedbecause, as we have seen, thegravitational mass may be reduced.When ig mm = the nonrelativistic

equation for inertial forces, amF gi

= ,

reduces to amF ii

= . This is the well-

known Newton's second law formotion. In Einstein's Special RelativityTheory the motion of a free-particle isdescribed by means of 0=Sδ [9]. Nowbased on Eq.(1), 0=Sδ will be givenby the following expression

∫ =−= .dscmS g 0δδwhich also describes the motion of theparticle inside the gravitational field.Thus, the Einstein's equations from theGeneral Relativity can be derivedstarting from ( ) 0=+ gm SSδ , where

gS and mS refer to action of the

gravitational field and the action of thematter, respectively [10]. The variations gSδ and mSδ can

be written as follows[11]:

9

( ) ( )6016 2

13

Ωδπ

δ dggRgRG

cS ik

ikikg −−= ∫( )61

2

1 Ωδδ dggTc

S ikikm −−= ∫

where ikR is the Ricci's tensor; ikg the

metric tensor and ikT the matter'senergy-momentum tensor:

( ) ( )62ikkigik PgPT ++= µµε

where P is the pressure and 2cgg ρε =is now, the density of gravitationalenergy, gE , of the particle; gρ is then

the density of gravitational mass of theparticle, i.e., gm at the volume unit.

Substitution of (60) and (61) into0=+ gm SS δδ yields

( ) 016

48

21

3

=−−−∫ Ωδπ

π dggTRgRG

c ikikc

Gikik

whence,( ) ( )6304

821 =−− ikc

Gikik TRgR π

because the ikgδ are arbitrary. The Eqs.(63) in the followingforms;

( )6448

21

ikcG

ikik TRgR π=−or

( )6548

21 .TRgR k

ic

Gki

ki

πδ =−are the Einstein's equations from theGeneral Relativity. Making on the obtainedequations for the gravitational field, thetransition to the Classical Mechanics,we obtain:

( )66442 g

gG

cG ρπ

επ∆Φ =

=

This is the nonrelativistic equation forthe gravitational field, whose generalsolution is

( )672∫−=

rc

dVG

gεΦ

This equation express thenonrelativistic potential of thegravitational field for any distribution ofmass. In particular, for only oneparticle with gravitational energy

2cmE gg = , the result is

( )682rcGEg−=ΦThus, the gravity g

into the

gravitational field created by theparticle is

( )69222

.r

mG

cr

EG

rg

gg −=−=

∂∂−= Φ

Therefore, the gravitational force gF

which acts on that field, upon anotherparticle of gravitational mass gm′ is

then given by:

( )702r

mmGgmF

gg

gg ′

−=′=

If 0<gm or 0<′gm the force will be

repulsive; the force will never be nulldue to the existence of a minimumvalue for gm (see Eq. (25)). However,

if ( )00 <′< gg mandm or

( )00 >′> gg mandm the force will

be attractive. Just for ig mm = and

ig mm ′=′ we obtain the Newton's

attraction law. Since the gravitational interactioncan be repulsive, besides attractive,such as the electromagneticinteraction, then the graviton musthave spin 1 and not 2. Consequently,the gravitational forces are also gaugeforces because they are yield by theexchange of so-called "virtual" quantaof spin 1, such as the electromagneticforces and the weak and strongnuclear forces. Let us now deduce the EntropyDifferential Equation starting from theEq.(55). Comparison of the Eqs.(55)and (41) shows that pcUnr ∆= . For

small velocities ( )cV << , cmp i<<∆ ,

so that 2cmUn ir << . Under these

circumstances, the development of theEq.(55) in power of ( )2cmUn ir , gives

10

( )71

2

2 i

i

rig m

cm

Unmm

−=

In the particular case of thermalradiation, it is usual to relate theenergy of the photons to temperature,through the relationship kTh ≈νwhere KJ.k 2310381 −×= is theBoltzmann's constant. Thus, in thatcase, the energy absorbed by theparticle will be kThU ηνη ≈= ,

where η is a particle-dependentabsorption/emission coefficient.Therefore, Eq.(71) may be rewritten inthe following form:

( )722

22

2 i

i

rig m

m

T

c

knmm

−=

η

For electrons at T=300K, we have

172

22

210−≈

e

r

m

T

c

kn η

Comparing Eq.(72) with Eq.(18), weobtain

( )732

1 22

.m

T

c

knE

i

rKi

=

η

The derivative of KiE with respect totemperature T is

( ) ( ) ( )742ir

Ki mTcknT

E η=∂

∂

Thus,( ) ( )75

2

2

cm

kTn

T

ET

i

rKi η=

∂∂

Substitution of 0iiKi EEE −= intoEq.(75) gives

( ) ( )762

20

cm

kTn

T

E

T

ET

i

rii η=

∂∂+

∂∂

By comparing the Eqs.(76) and (73)and considering that 00 =∂∂ TEi

because 0iE does not depends on T ,the Eq.(76) reduces to

( ) ( )772 Kii ETET =∂∂ However, Eq.(18) shows that

giKi EEE −=2 therefore Eq.(77) becomes

( ) ( )78TETEE iig ∂∂−=Here, we can identify the energy iE

with the free-energy of the system-Fand gE with the internal energy of the

system-U, thus we can write theEq.(78) in the following form:

( ) ( )79TFTFU ∂∂−=This is the well-known equation ofThermodynamics. On the other hand,remembering UQ ∂+∂=∂ τ (1st

principle of Thermodynamics) and( )80TSUF −=

(Helmholtz's function), we can easilyobtain from (79), the followingequation:

( )81.STQ ∂+∂=∂ τFor isolated systems, 0=∂τ , we thushave

( )82STQ ∂=∂which is the well-know EntropyDifferential Equation. Let us now consider the Eq.(55)in the ultra-relativistic case where theinertial energy of the particle

2cME ii = is very greater than its

inertial energy at rest 2cmi .

Comparison between (4) and (10)leads to 2cVEp i=∆ which, inthe ultra-relativistic case, gives

cMcEcVEp iii ≅≅= 2∆ . On the

other hand, comparison between (55)and (41) shows that pcUnr ∆= . Thus

22 cmcMpcUn iir >>≅=∆ . Consequently,

Eq.(55) reduces to( )832 2cUnmm rig −=

Therefore, the action for such particle,in agreement with the Eq.(2), is

( )[ ] ( )84121

12

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

22222

2222

222

∫∫∫

−+−−=

=−+−=

=−−=

t

t ri

t

t ri

t

t g

.dtcVUncVcm

dtcVccUnm

dtcVcmS

The integrant function is theLagrangean, i.e.,

11( )85121 22222 cVUncVcmL ri −+−−=

Starting from the Lagrangean we canfind the Hamiltonian of the particle, bymeans of the well-known generalformula:

( ) .LVLVH −∂∂=The result is:

( ) ( )861

24

1 22

22

22

2

.cV

cVUn

cV

cmH r

i

−

−+

−=

The second term on the right hand sideof the Eq.(86) results from theparticle's interaction with theelectromagnetic field. Note thesimilarity between the obtainedHamiltonian and the well-knownHamiltonian for the particle in aelectromagnetic field[12]:

( )871 222 .QcVcmH i ϕ+−=in which Q is the electric charge andϕ , the field's scalar potential. Thequantity ϕQ expresses, as we know,the particle's interaction with theelectromagnetic field. Such as thesecond term on the right hand side of theEq.(86). It is therefore evident that it is thesame quantity, expresses by means ofdifferent variables. Thus, we can conclude that, inultra-high energy conditions( )22 cmcMUn iir >≅ ,the gravitational

and electromagnetic fields can bedescribed by the same Hamiltonian, i.e.,in these circumstances they are unified ! It is known that starting from thatHamiltonian we may obtain a completedescription of the electromagnetic field.This means that from the present theoryfor gravity we can also derive theequations of the electromagnetic field.

Due to 2cMpcUn ir ≅= ∆ the

second term on the right hand side of theEq.(86) can be written as follows

( )

( )

2200

2

22

22

22

22

144

1

24

1

24

cVr

QQ

R

QQQ

cMcV

cV

cV

cVpc

i

−

′=

′==

=

−

−=

=

−

−

πεπεϕ

∆

whence

( )r

QQcMcV i

0

222

424

πε′

=−

The factor ( )24 22 −cV becomes equal to2 in the ultra-relativistic case, then followsthat

( )884

20

2

r

QQcM i πε

′=

From (25) we know that there is aminimum value for iM given by

( ) ( )minimini mM 0= . Equation (23) shows

that ( ) maxmaxming cdhcLhm 8380 ==

and Eq.(43) shows that ( ) ( )miniming mm 00 = .

Thus we can write

( ) ( ) ( )89830 maxminimini cdhmM ==

According to (88) the value ( )22 cM mini is

correlated to ( ) maxminmin rQrQQ 02

0 44 πεπε =′, i.e.,

( ) ( )9024

2

0

2

cMr

Qmini

max

min =πε

where minQ is the minimum electric chargein the Universe ( therefore equal tominimum electric charge of the quarks,i.e., e3

1 ); maxr is the maximum distance

between Q and Q′ , which should be

equal to the so-called "diameter", cd , of

the visible Universe ( maxc ld 2= where

maxl is obtained from the Hubble's law for

cVmax = , i.e., 1−= H~

clmax ). Thus from

(90) we readily obtain

12

( )( )

( )91

96

24

31

120

0

e

dH~

hc

ddhcQ

max

maxcmin

=

==

==−πε

πε

whence we findm.dmax

301043 ×=This will be the maximum "diameter" thatthe Universe will reach. Consequently,Eq.(89) tells us that the elementaryquantum of matter is

( ) kg.cdhm maxmini73

0 109383 −×== Now by combination of gravity andthe uncertainty principle we will derive theexpression of the Casimir force. An uncertainty im∆ in im

produces an uncertainty p∆ in p and

therefore an uncertainty gm∆ in gm ,

which according to Eq.(41) , is given by

( )92112

2

ii

ig mcm

pmm ∆

∆∆∆∆

−

+−=

From the uncertainty principle for positionand momentum, we know that the productof the uncertainties of the simultaneouslymeasurable values of correspondingposition and momentum components is atleast of the order of magnitude of

, i.e.,

~rp∆∆Substitution of r~p ∆∆

into (92) yields

( )931122

ii

ig mr

cmmm ∆

∆∆

∆∆

−

+−=

Therefore if

( )94cm

ri∆

∆

<<

then the expression (93) reduces to:

( )952rc

mg ∆∆

−≅

Note that gm∆ does not depend on gm .

Consequently, the uncertainty F∆in the gravitational force 2rmGmF gg ′−= ,

will be given by

( )

( ) ( ) ( )962

322

2

−=

=′

−=

c

G

r

hc

r

r

mmGF gg

∆∆π

∆∆∆

∆

The amount ( ) m.cG 353 1061121 −×=

is

called the Planck length, planckl ,( the length

scale on which quantum fluctuations of themetric of the space time are expected tobe of order unity). Thus, we can write theexpression of F∆ as follows

( )

( )

( ) ( )97480

960

480

2

40

224

24

r

hcA

lr

hc

lr

hcF

planck

planck

∆π

π∆π

∆π∆

−=

=

−=

=

−=

or

( )98480 4

00 r

hcAF

−= π

which is the expression of the Casimir

force for ( ) 220 960 plancklAA π== .

This suggests that 0A is anelementary area related to existence of a

minimum length planckmin lk~

d = . What is in

accordance with the quantization of space(29) which point out the existence of

mind .

One can be easily shown that theminimum area related to mind is the areaof an equilateral triangle of side length

mind ,i.e.,

( ) ( ) 22432

43

planckminmin lk~

dA ==On the other hand, the maximum arearelated to mind is the area of an sphere

of radius mind ,i.e.,222planckminmax lk

~dA ππ ==

Thus, the elementary area( )99222

0 planckAminA lk~

dA δδ ==must have a value between minA and

maxA , i.e.,

13πδ << A4

3

The previous assumption that( ) 22

0 960 plancklA π= shows that22 960 πδ =k

~A what means that

91465 .k~

. <<Therefore we conclude that

( )10010 34 .mlk~

d planckmin−≈=

The esimaln − area after 0A is

( ) ( )101022 AnndA minA ==δ

One can also be easily shownthat the minimum volume related to

mind is the volume of an regular

tetrahedron of edge length mind , i.e.,

( ) ( ) 3312

2312

2planckminmin lk

~d ==Ω

The maximum volume is the volume ofa sphere of radius mind , i.e.,

( ) ( ) 333

433

4planckminmax lk

~d ππΩ ==

Thus, the elementary volume333

0 planckVminV lk~

d δδΩ == must have a

value between minΩ and maxΩ , i.e.,

( )3

412

2 πδ << V

On the other hand, the esimaln −volume after 0Ω is

( ) .n,...,,,nnnd maxminV 321033 === ΩδΩ

The existence of maxn given by (26),i.e.,

( ) 6430 101043 ≈×=

===

planck

minmaxminmaxmax

lk~

.

ddLLn

shows that the Universe must have afinite volume whose value at thepresent stage is

( ) 3330

3pVminVminpUpUp ddddn δδΩΩ ===

where pd is the present length scale of

the Universe. In addition as( )

34

122 πδ << V we conclude that the

Universe must have a polyhedralspace topology with volume betweenthe volume of a regular tetrahedron ofedge length pd and the volume of the

sphere of diameter pd .

A recent analysis ofastronomical data suggests not onlythat the Universe is finite, but also thatit has a dodecahedral space topology[13,14], what is in strong accordancewith the theoretical predictions above. Now multiplying (98) by 2n theexpression of 0F we obtain

( )102480480 44

02

02

r

hcA

r

hcAnFnF

−=

−== ππ

which is the general expression of theCasimir force. Thus we conclude that theCasimir effect is just a gravitationaleffect related to the uncertaintyprinciple. Note that the Eq.(102) arisesonly when im∆ and im′∆ satisfy

Eq.(94). If only im∆ satisfies Eq.(94),

i.e., rcmi ∆∆ << but rcmi ∆∆ >>′ then

gm∆ and gm′∆ will be respectively

given by

ig

g

mm

and

rcm

∆∆

∆∆

≅′

−≅ 2

Consequently, the expression (96)becomes

( ) ( )

( )( )103

43

4

2

323

′

=

=

′=

′

=

c

EG

r

hc

c

cmG

r

hc

c

mG

r

hcF ii

π∆

∆

π∆

∆π∆

∆∆

However, from the uncertainty principle forenergy and time we know that

( )104t~E ∆∆ Therefore we can write the expression(103) in the following form:

( )

( ) ( )1051

1

23

33

′=

=

′

=

ctl

r

hc

ctc

G

r

hcF

planck ∆π∆

∆π∆∆

From the General Relativity Theory weknow that 00gcdtdr −= . If the field is

14weak then 2

00 21 cg φ−−= and

( ) ( )222 11 crGmcdtccdtdr −=+= φ .

For 122 <<crGm we obtain cdtdr ≅ .Thus, if rddr ′= then tddt ′= . Thismeans that we may change ( )ct′∆ by( )r∆ into (105). The result is

( )

( )

( )40

224

24

960

480

480

1

021

r

hcA

lr

hc

lr

hcF

A

planck

planck

∆π

π∆π

π∆∆

=

=

=

=

=

or

40

0 960 r

hcAF

=

π

whence

( )106960 4r

hcAF

=

π

Now the Casimir force is repulsive, andits intensity is the half of the intensitypreviously obtained (102). Consider the case when both

im∆ and im′∆ do not satisfy Eq.(94),and

rcm

rcm

i

i

∆∆∆∆

>>′>>

In this case, ig mm ∆∆ ≅ and ig mm ′≅′ ∆∆ .

Thus,

( )( )( )

( )( )( ) ( )

( )

( ) ( )402

24

24

22232

2

4

2

22

2

1920

960

1920

2

1

1

r

hcAl

r

hc

lr

hc

tcr

hc

c

G

r

t

c

G

r

cEcEG

r

mmGF

planck

planck

ii

∆π

π∆π

∆π

∆∆∆∆

∆∆∆

∆∆∆∆

−=

−=

=

−=

=

−=

−=

=′

−=′

−=

whence

( )1071920 4r

hcAF

−=

π

The force will be attractive and itsintensity will be the fourth part of theintensity given by the first expression(102) for the Casimir force. There is a crucial cosmologicalproblem to be solved: the problem ofthe hidden mass. Most theories predictthat the amount of known matter,detectable and available in theuniverse, is only about 1/10 to 1/100 ofthe amount needed to close theuniverse. That is, to achieve thedensity sufficient to close-up theuniverse by maintaining thegravitational curvature (escape velocityequal to the speed of light) at the outerboundary. The Eq.(45) may solve thisproblem. We will start by substitutingthe well-known expression of Hubble'slaw for velocity, lH

~V = , into Eq.(45).

( 1181071 −−×= s.H~

is the Hubbleconstant). The expression obtainedshows that particles which are atdistances ( )( ) m.H

~cll 26

0 103135 ×===have quasi null gravitational mass

( )mingg mm 0= ; beyond this distance, the

particles have negative gravitationalmass. Therefore, there are two well-defined regions in the Universe; theregion of the bodies with positivegravitational masses and the region of thebodies with negative gravitational mass.The total gravitational mass of the firstregion, in accordance with Eq.(45), will begiven by

1221

111

1i

iig m

cV

mMM ≅

−=≅

where 1im is the total inertial mass ofthe bodies of the mentioned region;

cV <<1 is the average velocity of thebodies at region 1. The totalgravitational mass of the second regionis

15

2222

22 11

12 iig M

cVMM

−

−−=

where 2V is the average velocity of

the bodies ; 22222 1 cVmM ii −= and

2im is the total inertial mass of thebodies of region 2. Now consider that from Eq.(7),we can write

2

2

cV

cM

V

Eg

gg ρξ ===

where ξ is the energy density of matter.

Note that the expression of ξonly reduces to the well-knownexpression 2cρ , where ρ is the sum ofthe inertial masses per volume unit,when ig mm = . Therefore, in thederivation of the well-known difference

( )1083

8 2H~G U −

ρπ

which gives the sign of the curvatureof the Universe [15], we must use

2cgUρξ = instead of 2cUρξ = .The

result obviously is

( )1093

82H

~G gU −ρπ

where

( )11021

U

gg

U

gU

gUV

MM

V

M +==ρ

gUM and UV are respectively the total

gravitational mass and the volume ofthe Universe.Substitution of 1gM and 2gM into

expression (110) gives

U

iiiU

gU V

mmcVcV

m

−

−−

−+

=

22222

222

1

2

1

3

ρ

where 21 iiiU mmm += is the totalinertial mass of the Universe. The volume 1V of the region 1and the volume 2V of the region 2, arerespectively given by

132

230

21 22 VlVandlV c −== ππ

where m.H~

cl c261081 ×== is the

so-called "radius" of the visibleUniverse. Moreover, 111 Vmii =ρ and

222 Vmii =ρ . Due to the hypothesis ofthe uniform distribution of matter in thespace, follows that 21 ii ρρ = .Thus, wecan write

3803

0

2

1

2

1 .l

l

V

V

m

m

ci

i =

==

Similarly,

1

1

2

2

V

m

V

m

V

m ii

U

iU ==

Therefore,

iUiUc

iUU

i m.ml

lm

V

Vm 6201

3

022 =

−==

and iUi m.m 3801 = .

Substitution of 2im into the expression

of gUρ yields

U

iUiU

gUV

m.cV

.

cV

.m

−

−−

−+

=

6201

241

1

86122

222

2ρ

Due to cV ≅2 , we conclude that theterm between bracket (hidden mass) isvery greater than iUm10 . The amount

iUm is the mass of known matter in theuniverse (1/10 to 1/100 of the amountneeded to close the Universe). Consequently, the total mass

−

−−

−+ iUiU m.

cV

.

cV

.m 620

1

241

1

86122

222

2

must be sufficient to close theUniverse. This solves therefore theproblem of the hidden mass. There is another cosmologicalproblem to be solved: the problem ofthe anomalies in the spectral red-shiftof certain galaxies and stars. Several observers have noticedred-shift values that cannot beexplained by the Doppler-Fizeau

16effect or by the Einstein effect (thegravitational spectrum shift, suppliedby Einstein's theory). This is the case of the so-calledStefan's quintet (a set of five galaxieswhich were discovered in 1877),whose galaxies are located atapproximately the same distance fromthe Earth, according to very reliableand precise measuring methods. But,when the velocities of the galaxies aremeasured by its red-shifts , the velocity ofone of them is much greater than thevelocity of the others. Similar observations have beenmade on the Virgo constellation andspiral galaxies. Also the Sun presentsa red-shift greater than the predictedvalue by the Einstein effect. It seems that some of theseanomalies can be explained if weconsider the Eq.(45) in the calculationof the gravitational mass of the pointof emission. The expression of thegravitational spectrum shift, suppliedby Einstein's theory [16] is given by

( )11112

1122

1212

21

ω

ωφφ

ωωω∆

c

rGmrGmc

gg +−=

=−

=−=

where 1ω is the frequency of the lightat the point of emission ; 2ω is thefrequency at the point of observation;

1φ and 2φ are respectively, theNewtonian gravitational potentials atthe point of emission and at the pointof observation. This expression has beendeduced from 000 gtt −= [17] which

correlates own time (real time), t , withthe temporal coordinate x0 of thespace-time ( cxt 0

0 = ). When the gravitational field isweak , the temporal component 00g

of the metric tensor is given by 221 c/goo φ−−= [18]. Thus we readily obtain

( )11221 20 rcGmtt g−=

Curiously, this equation tell usthat we can have 0tt < when 0>gm ;

and 0tt > for 0<gm . In addition, if

Grcmg 22= , i.e., if 22 cGmr g=( Schwarzschild radius ) we obtain 0=t . These theoretical results lead toa new conception of time with amazingpractical consequences. Let us now consider the well-known process of stars' gravitationalcontraction. It is known that thedestination of the star is directlycorrelated to its mass. If the star'smass is less than 1.4M ( Schemberg-Chandrasekhar's limit), it becomes awhite dwarf. If its mass exceeds thatlimit, the pressure produced by thedegenerate state of the matter nolonger counterbalances thegravitational pressure, and the star'scontraction continues. Afterwardsoccur the reactions between protonsand electrons ( capture of electrons ),where neutrons and anti-neutrinos areproduced. The contraction continues untilthe system regains stability ( when thepressure produced by the neutrons issufficient to stop the gravitationalcollapse). Such systems are calledneutron stars. There is also a critical mass forthe stable configuration of neutronstars. This limit has not been fullydefined as yet, but it is known that it islocated between 1.8M and 2.4M . Thus,if the mass of the star exceeds 2.4M ,the contraction will continue. According to Hawking[19]collapsed objects cannot have massless than kg.Gc 810114 −×=

. This

means that the neutrons clusterbecomes a cluster of superparticleswhere the minimal inertial mass of thesuperparticle is

17

( ) ( )1131011 8 .kg.m spi−×=

Symmetry is a fundamental attributeof the Universe that enables aninvestigator to study particular aspectsof physical systems by themselves. Forexample, the assumption that space ishomogeneous and isotropic is basedon Symmetry Principle. Also here, bysymmetry, we can assume that thereare only superparticles with mass

( ) kg.m spi81011 −×= in the cluster of

superparticles. Let us now imagine the Universecoming back for the past. There will bean instant in which it will be similar to aneutrons cluster, such as the stars atthe final state of gravitationalcontraction. Thus, with the progressingof the compression, the neutronscluster becomes a cluster ofsuperparticles. Obviously, this only canoccur before 10-23s(after the Big-Bang). The temperature T of theUniverse at the 10-43s< t < 10-23speriod can be calculated by means ofthe well-known expression[20]:

( ) ( )1141010 21

2322 −−≈ tT

Thus at st 4310−≅ ( at the firstspontaneous breaking of symmetry )the temperature was KT 3210≈(∼ 1019GeV).Therefore, we can assumethat the absorbed electromagneticenergy by each superparticle, before

st 4310−≅ , was JkTU 9101×>=η ( seeEqs.(71) and (72) ). By comparing with

( ) Jcm spi82 109×≅ , we conclude that

( ) cmU spi> . Therefore, the unification

condition ( )22 cmcMUn iir >≅ is

satisfied. This means that, beforest 4310−≅ , the gravitational and

electromagnetic interactions wereunified.

From the unification condition( )2cMUn ir ≅ , we may conclude that the

superparticles' relativistic inertialmass ( )spiM is

( ) ( )11510 8

22kg

c

kTn

c

UnM rr

spi−≈=≅

η

Comparing with the superparticles'inertial mass at rest (113), weconclude that

( ) ( ) ( )1161011 8kg.mM spispi−×=≈

From Eqs.(83) and (115), we obtainthe superparticle's gravitational massat rest, i.e.,

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( )117

2

2c

kTnM

Mmm

rspi

spispispg

η−≅−≅

≅−=

and consequently, the superparticle'srelativistic gravitational mass, is

( ) ( )1181 222 cVc

kTnM r

spg−

−= η

Thus, the gravitational forces betweentwo superparticles , according to (13),is given by:

( ) ( )

( )

( )( ) ( )119212

2

5

2

2122112

µκη

µ

ˆr

cTn

c

G

m

M

ˆr

MMGFF

r

spi

spi

'spgspg

!!

=

=−=−=

Due to the unification of thegravitational and electromagneticinteractions at that period, we have

( ) ( )

( )

( )( )

( )1204 2

0

2

212

2

5

2

2122112

r

e

ˆr

cT

c

G

m

M

ˆr

MMGFF

spi

spi

'spgspg

πε

µηκ

µ

=

=

=

==−=

""

##

From the equation above we can write

18

( )

( )( ) ( )121

4 0

22

5

2

πεηκ e

cTc

G

m

M

spi

spi =

$$

Now assuming that

( )

( )( ) ( )1222

5

2

ψηκ =

T

c

G

m

M

spi

spi %

the Eq.(121) can be rewritten in thefollowing form:

( )123137

1

4 0

2

==c

e %πε

ψ

which is the well-known reciprocal finestructure constant . For KT 3210= the Eq.(122) gives

( )

( )( ) ( )124

100

12

5

2

≈

= Tn

c

G

m

Mr

spi

spi κηψ &This value has the same order ofmagnitude that the exact value(1/137)of the reciprocal fine structureconstant. From equation (120) we canwrite:

( ) ( ) ( )125&'' =

r

rc

MMG

'spgspg

ψ

The term between parenthesis has thesame dimensions that the linearmomentum p( . Thus Eq.(125) tells usthat

( )126.rp )**=⋅

A component of the momentum of aparticle cannot be precisely specifiedwithout loss of all knowledge of thecorresponding component of itsposition at that time ,i.e., a particlecannot precisely localized in aparticular direction without loss of allknowledge of its momentumcomponent in that direction . Thismeans that in intermediate cases theproduct of the uncertainties of thesimultaneously measurable values ofcorresponding position and momentumcomponents is at least of the order ofmagnitude of + ,i.e.,

( )127)≥r.p∆∆

This relation, directly obtained herefrom the Unified Theory, is the well-known relation of the UncertaintyPrinciple for position and momentum. According to Eq.(83), thegravitational mass of the superparticlesat the center of the cluster becomesnegative when ( )spir mckTn >22η ,

i.e., when

( ).K

kn

mTT

r

spi

critical3210

2≈=>

ηAccording to Eq.(114) this temperaturecorresponds to stc

4310−≈ .

With the progressing of thecompression, more superparticles intothe center will have negativegravitational mass. Consequently,there will have a critical point in whichthe repulsive gravitational forcesbetween the superparticles withnegative gravitational masses and thesuperparticles with positivegravitational masses will be so strongthat an explosion will occur. This is theexperiment that we call the Big Bang.

Now, starting from the Big Bang tothe present time. Immediately after the BigBang, the superparticles' decompressingbegins. The gravitational mass of the mostcentral superparticle will only be positivewhen the temperature becomes smallerthan the critical temperature,

KTcritical3210≈ . At the maximum state

of compression ( exactly at the BigBang ) the volumes of thesuperparticles was equal to theelementary volume minV dδΩ =0 and thevolume of the Universe was

( ) 33initialVminV dnd δδΩ == where initiald was

the initial length scale of the Universe. Atthis very moment the average density ofthe Universe was equal to the averagedensity of the superparticles, thus we canwrite

( )

( )( )128

3

spi

Ui

min

initial

m

M

d

d=

where ( ) kgM Ui5310≈ is the inertial

19mass of the Universe. It has already beenshown that .mlk

~d planckmin

3410−≈= Then,

from the Eq.(128), we obtain:

( )12910 14mdinitial−≈

After the Big Bang the Universe expandsitself from initiald up to crd ( when

the temperature decreasing reaches thecritical temperature KTcritical

3210≈ , andthe gravity becomes attractive). Thus, itexpands by initialcr dd − , under effect ofthe repulsive gravity

( )( ) ( )[ ] ( )( ) ( )[ ]( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( )

initialcr

Ui

initialcr

Uispi

initialcr

Uispg

initialcr

UiUg

crUiinitialUg

minmax

dd

GM

dd

MmG

dd

MmG

dd

MMG

dMGdMG

ggg

χχ 22

22

2

21

212

21

21

==

===

==

==

∑

∑

during to a time stc4310−≈ .Thus,

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )13022

21

cinitialcr

Ui

cinitialcr tdd

GMtgdd χ==−

The Eq.(83), gives

( )

( ) ( ) ( )T

cm

kTn

cm

Un

m

m

spi

r

spi

r

spi

spg 32

2210

21

21 −≈−=−==

ηχ

The temperature at the beginning ofthe Big Bang (t=0) should have beenvery greater than KTcritical

3210≈ .Thus, χ must be a very big number.Then it is easily seen that during thisperiod, the Universe expanded at anastonishing rate. Thus, there is anevident inflation period, which ends at

st c4310−≈ .

With the progressing of thedecompression, the superparticlescluster becomes a neutrons cluster.This means that the neutrons arecreated without its antiparticle, theantineutron. Thus it solves thematter/antimatter dilemma that isunresolved in many cosmologies. Now a question: How did theprimordial superparticles appear at thebeginning of the Universe?

It is a proven quantum factthat a wave function Ψ may collapseand that at this moment all thepossibilities that it describes aresuddenly expressed in reality. Thismeans that, through this process,particles can be suddenly materialized. The materialization of theprimordial superparticles into a criticalvolume denotes knowledge of whatwould happen starting from that initialcondition, fact that points towards theexistence of a Creator.

CONCLUSION We have described acoherent way for the quantization ofgravity, which provides a consistentunification of gravity withelectromagnetism. As we have seen,this new approach will allow us tounderstand some crucial matters inQuantum Cosmology. The equation of correlationbetween gravitational and inertialmasses, which has been deriveddirectly from the theory of gravity, hasrelevant technological consequences.We have seen that gravitational masscan be negative at specific conditions.This means that it will be possible tobuild gravitational binaries(gravitational motors), and to extractenergy from any site of a gravitationalfield. Obviously, the Gravity Control willbe also very important toTransportation Systems. On the otherhand, negative gravitational masssuggests the possibility of dipolegravitational radiation. This fact ishighly relevant because now we maybuild transceivers to operate withgravitational waves. Furthermore, thereceiver would allow us to directlyobserve for the first time the CosmicMicrowave Background in GravitationalRadiation, which would picture theUniverse at the beginning of the Big-Bang.

20APPENDIX A It is known that the orbitalangular momentum L

, and the intrinsic

spin angular momentum S,

interactmagnetically between themselves toproduce a total angular momentum J

,.

We then have( ) ( )11 AllL += -

( )2AmL lz -=

( ) ( )31 AssS += -( )4AmS sz -=

( ) ( )51 AjjJ += -( )6AmJ jz

.=

where l is the orbital quantum number,s is the spin quantum number,

slj ±= is the total quantumnumber; lm is the orbital magnetic

quantum number; sm is the spinmagnetic quantum number and

slj mmm ±= is the total magnetic

number. Also atomic nuclei have intrinsicangular momenta that contribute tothe total angular momenta of theatoms. However, this contribution isnegligible [21]. The magnetic moment jM

,associated with J

, is [22]:( ) ( )72 AJmeM j

,,γ=

where γ is called the gyromagneticratio. The values of γ for electrons,neutrons and protons are respectively:- 2.0024; -3.8256 and 5.5851. Fornuclear protons,

( ) ( ) .J,J,mm

m,slj,ms,ml

pzpsl

jsl

-- 2123

1

21

21

21

===−

==−=====

Thus, Eq.(A7) gives( ) ( )8104422 226 Am.A.JmeM pppJp

−×==γ( ) ( )9104112 226 Am.A.JmeM pzppJpz

−×==γ

Then the total magnetic field JpH,

of

the proton is [23]:

( )102 3 ArMH JpJp π,,

=where r is the spin radius of theproton. The total magnetic fieldinduction is JpJp HB

,,0µ= , therefore

( )1110874 3330 Ar.HB JpJp

−×== µ We can write the angularmomentum pJ

, in the following form

ppp KJ ω= where pω is the angular

velocity of the proton and pK its

angular kinetic energy, given by

( )1211

1222

2

AcVr

cIK

p

pp

−

−=

where rV pp ω= and

( ) ( )131 2222

22

Armrmrr

rmrmI

ppp

pppp

χβ

β

=+=

=+=

is the moment of inertia with respect tothe rotation axis; β is a numericalfactor, which depends on the structuralform adopted for the proton. In thecase of a solid sphere, 5

2=β . For cV << , Eq.(A12) reduces to

( )( ) ( ) 22

1222

12222 2 ωIrVIcVrIcK ===Comparison of ( )-23=pJ and

ppp KJ ω= shows that

( ) ( )1411

1

23 22

2

AcV

cm

p

pp

p

−

−= -

χω

From the intrinsic precessionmotion of the proton we observe that

Fig. 1

x

z

yα

αα r

F

Vp

R

.

BJpz BJp

BJpx

21(Fig.1) the component of the Lorentz'sforce, JpzpJpzp BeVsinBeVF == φ , about the x

axis, αcosF ,is equal to the centripetalforce ppppppcp VmrIrVmF ωχω === 22 .Thus,

( ) ( )15AVmcosBeV ppppJpzp ωχα =However αcosBB JpJpz = . Therefore

the equation above becomes

( )162

Acose

mB

ppp

Jp αωχ

=

Comparison of (A16) and (A11) showsthat

( )17106642

225 A

r

cos.V

pp χ

α−×=

Due to cVp < , it follows from Eq.(A17)

that

( )18028010836 13

Arcos.cos

c

.r p

pp χα

χα =

×>−

where m.r p151041 −×= and

5770.JJcos ppz ==αOn the other hand, from the nucleardimensions we know that

m.rr p151041 −×=< . Thus we can write

( )190280

Arrrcos.

pp

p

<<χ

α

An approximated value for r can beobtained by means of the followingrelation

( )200280

Arcos.

YY

rr p

p

p

==

χα

whence4877 p.Y χ=

Therefore we can write

( )2110781 416 A.Y

rr p

p χ−×==

or

( )2210014

63

Ar

.p

−×=χ

From (A13) we have 22 10 pp r.r ≅χsince prr < . Thus from (A22) we

obtain

( )23107 17 Amr −×≅and

( )2441 Ap ≅χComparison of rVpp =ω and (A14) shows

that

( )251074

11

1

9

22

A.

cV

V

p

p ×=

−

−

whence

( )261083 7 As/m.Vp ×= Now consider a sample of amonatomic substance ( atomicnumber Z ) inside an externalmagnetic field of induction B

/. Under

these circumstances the nuclearprotons carry out a precession motionwith respect to the direction of B

/,

making an angle θ with B/

(Fig.2).The binary pτ which tends to align the

axis of pL/

with the axis of B/

is

( )27ABsinM Jpzp θτ =

where 22610411 m.A.M Jpz−×= .

Therefore the magnetic field

JpB/

of each nuclear proton is

aligned at the same direction of pL/

,

and consequently the magnetic field ofthe nucleus, NB

/, due to the protons at

the direction of pL/

, will be given by

Fig.2

Lp θ

B

22( )28ABZB JpN

00=

Only the component, θsinBN , alters

the radius r (Fig.3). The force rF ,

produced by θsinBN

0 and pV

0,

increases the centripetal forcerVmF pp

2= decreasing r and

increasing pV0

. This means that the

proton acquires a new velocitycrV pp ≈′′=′ ω which corresponds to a

magnetic field JpB′0

through the proton

that is equal to( )29AsinZBsinBB JpNJp θθ ==′

This phenomenon is similar to astrong compression upon the proton,which decrease r increasing pV .

Equation (45) tells us that, if c.Vp 7450>the gravitational mass of the protonbecomes negative. This explains thenegative gravitational masses of thesuperparticles, under strong thermalcompression, in the neutron clusterspreviously mentioned. From Eqs.(A16) and (A14) we have

( ) ( )3011

1

23 222

222

2

AcVcose

cm

cose

mB

p

pp

ppp

Jp

−

−=

==

αχ

αωχ

1

( ) ( )3111

1

23 222

222

2

AcVcose

cm

cose

mB

p

pp

ppp

Jp

−

′−′=

=′′

=′

α

χ

αωχ

2whence

( )32

11

1

11

1

22

2

22

2

A

cVcos

cVcos

B

B

p

p

Jp

Jp

−

−′

−

′−=

′

α

α

Comparison of (A32) and (A29) gives

( )

( ) ( )3311

1

11

1

2

2

22

22

Acos

cosZsin

cV

cV

p

p

ααθ ′

−

−=

=

−

′−

Substitution of (A33) into (45) shows thatthe gravitational mass of the nuclearprotons can be written as follows

( )3411

12

2

2

22Am

cos

cosZsin

cVmm p

p

pgp ααθ ′

−

−−=

From (A14) we can write

( )35

11

1

11

1

22

22

A

cV

cV

V

V

V

V

r

r

p

p

p

p

pp

pp

−

′−

−

−

′=

′′=

′ωω

Comparison of (A35) and (A32) shows that

( )362

2

AV

V

r

r

cos

cos

B

B

p

p

Jp

Jp

′

′=

′′

αα

Substitution of (A29) into (A36) gives

( )372

2

Acos

cos

V

VZsin

r

r

p

p

ααθ

′

′

=′

It can be easily shown that( ) αα tanrrtan ′=′ . Thus (A37)

becomes

( )382

2 AV

V

Zsin

sinsin

p

p

′=′

θαα

where 9402 .sin =α .

Fig.3

θ

α

αrp

proton

B

BNcosθ

BNsinθ

z

Vp

Fr

r

BN

BJp

R

23 For pp VV =′ , 1=θsin and maxZZ = ,

we obtain from (A38),( ) ( )391012 2 AZsin maxmin

−≅≅′αwhence we obtain ( ) 310−≅′

minsinα .

Thus ( ) ( ) 11 2 ≅′−=′minmax sincos αα .

On the other hand, ( ) 12 =′maxsin α .

Therefore, ( ) 707045 .ºsinsin max ==′α

and ( ) ( ) 701 2 .sincos maxmin ≅′−=′ αα .

Thus170 <′< αcos.

Substitution of s/m.Vp71083 ×= ,

33302 .cos =α and 802 .cos ≅′α intoEq.(A34) yields

( ) ( )4010931 2 AmZsin.m pgp θ−×−= The density of electromagneticenergy in an electromagnetic field is

2212

21 HEW µε += . It is known that

HvvBE µ== where, according to

(54), µσω2=v for ωεσ >> . Thus

( )4112 2

212

21 AHHW µµ

σωε ≅

+=

For ωεσ << , Eq.(54) shows that

rrcv µε= and therefore we obtain2HW µ= .

In the case of nuclear protonsinside H

3, the work to bring the dipole

from 0=ϕ (null energy) to ϕ is

( )420

AdU p∫=ϕ

ϕτ

where ϕτ BsinM Jpzp = in agreement

with (A27); HB 0µ= . Thus we can write

( )432

2

0

0

ABsinMdsinBM

dU

JpzJpz

p

∫∫

−

−

==

==θ

θ

π

π

θϕϕ

ϕτ

This energy is equal to the energy"extracted" from the field to align eachnuclear proton at the samedirection ( )θ , which is given by

( ) ( )442202

1 AZVHU *µ=where *V is the volume of the sphere

of radius *r , around the nucleus,defined as follows:The density of energy W is the same

in each point inside H . This meansthat the density of energy in eachorbital electron,

ceorbitalspaJeze VBsinMW θ=is equal to the density in each proton,

*Jpzp VBsinMW θ=

where ( )33

4*atomceorbitalspa rrV −= π ; atomr

is the radius of the atom, and 33

4** rV π= .

Thus

( ) 33*

Jpz

*atom

Jez

r

M

rr

M =−

whence,

( )4510301 3

Ar.MM

rr atom

JpzJez

atom* =

+=

since ( ) 224102792 m.A.JmeM ezeeJez−×==γ

and 22610411 m.A.M Jpz−×= .

Note that *r is smaller than theradius of the first electronic orbit of theatom ( )m~ 11105 −× .Comparison of (A43) and (A44) showsthat

( )4610466

104664

328

328

0

AdScos

d

Z

r.

BZ

r.B

MZ

Vsin

Batom

atom

Jpz

*

×=

=×=

=

ςΦ

µθ

sincedScosBSd.Bd B ςΦ ==

33 Note that the expression of

θsin as function of B yields onlypositive values of θsin . Thus, itis necessary the substitution of Bby dScosd B ςΦ to show explicitly thenegative values of θsin . Thus, if

2πς > the Eq.(A46) yields 0<θsin .In this case, the sign ( )− in Eq.(A40)becomes ( )+ . In practice when a magnetapproaches from a metallic sample, amagnetic field is induced at the sample( in opposition to the magnetic field of

24the magnet ). Under these conditions,the angle ς between the induced

magnetic flux density B4

and Sd4

iszero, and therefore the magnetic flux

Sd.BB

44=Φ will be positive and, in

accordance with (A40), there will be adecrease in the gravitational mass ofthe sample. However, when themagnet is moved backward thedirection of the induced magnetic fluxdensity is inverted ( the angle ςbecomes equal to 1800 ) making

Sd.BB

44=Φ negative. In this case there

will be an increase in the gravitationalmass of the sample. It was implicitlyassumed in both cases that theoscillating period ( T ) of the magnet isrelatively long. If T is short the concept ofEffective or Root-Mean-Square Valuemay be extended to the periodicmagnetic flux ( )tBB ΦΦ = . The result is

( ) ( )471

0

2 AdtT

T

BrmsB ∫= ΦΦ

Thus, the effective value of BΦ is

( )rmsBΦ (always positive). This means

that, ςcos will be always positive.Consequently, θsin will be alwayspositive too, and the sign ( )− inEq.(A40) does not change, i.e., it willbe always negative. For θsin always positive wemay take the expression of θsin asfunction of B in (A46). In addition, ifthe oscillating period of the magneticflux ( )tBB ΦΦ = is short we maychange B for rmsB , and consequentlythe substitution of (A46) into (A40)yields

[ ] ( )48105221 327 AmBr.m prmsatomgp ×−=

For a sinusoidal waveform, theeffective value of the magnetic fluxdensity, as we know, is

2m

rms

BB =

According to (A46) the value ofθsin will be null when 0=BdΦ .

Consider then the Maxwell's equation

( )49At

BE

∂∂−=×∇

44

whence we obtain

( )( )50A

dt

d

SdBdt

dSd

t

BSdE

B

SSS

Φ−=

=⋅−=∂∂−=×∇ ∫∫∫

44444

If B does not depends on time(constant with respect to the time) then

0=∂∂ tB and (A49) shows that

0=×∇ E4

. Thus (A50) gives0=BdΦ

In this case, Eq.(A46) gives 0=θsinand consequently Eq.(A40) reduces to

pgp mm = .

Now consider Eq.(A48). Notethat besides rmsB it depends on 3

atomr .

The values of atomr for light elements

such as Mg, Al, Si, are m. 1010751 −×m. 1010431 −× , m. 1010171 −× respectively.

For heavy elements such as Pt, Au,Pb, the values are m. 1010381 −× ,

m. 1010441 −× , m. 1010751 −× respectively.Thus, for Mg or Pb the Eq.(A48) gives

[ ] ( )51103511 2 AmB.m prmsgp−×−=

which shows that to yield a variation >1% in the gravitational mass of theprotons of Mg or Pb , it is necessary

T.Brms 740> Recently, superconductingmagnets are able to produce T.714 ,therefore the validity of this part of thetheory can be checked.

25

APPENDIX B Equation (59) shows that thegravitational mass of a specialdielectric called Duracap 86103 isstrongly decreased when it issubjected to electromagnetic fields withintensities > 200 V/m and frequenciesof the order of magnitude of Hz6101 −× . In order to check this theoreticalprediction we propose to submit a diskof Duracap 86103 ∗ ( 5 mm thickness)to the electric field of a parallel-platecapacitor as showed in Fig.4. Thedensity of the Duracap is 31400 −= m.kgρand its electrical properties are: 3=rε ;

1=rµ ; mm/KV.strengthdieletric 498= ;m/S.393=σ (electrical conductivity).

The capacitor is placed betweentwo disks of plexiglas and connectedto an oscillator HP3325A (Op.002-High Voltage Output) which cangenerate sinusoidal voltages withextremely-low frequencies down to

Hz6101 −× with amplitude up to 20V. Avoltmeter at parallel with the capacitorwill measure the appliedinstantaneous voltage ftsinVV map π2= .

When a sinusoidal voltageftsinVV map π2= , is applied at the

terminals of the capacitor, the electricfield E inside the dielectric is

( )1Bl

VE

r

ap

ε=

Where l is the thickness of thedielectric. Therefore, the gravitational massof the dielectric, ( )diegm , in agreement

with (59), is given by

( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( )211075121 3420 BmfV.m dieiapdieg −×+−= −

where ( )dieim is the initial inertial mass

of the dielectric (Duracap), ( ) g.m diei 9754= .

∗ Duracap 86103 is produced by Polyone Inc.,www.polyone.com

Only for 0=apV the gravitational mass

of the dielectric is equal to its initialinertial mass. Applying on the capacitors asinusoidal voltage wave of 40Vpp

(amplitude VVm 20= ) with frequency

Hzf 6101 −×= then, at h.s.t 2227957 ≅≅the applied instantaneous voltage willbe VVap 1= and the balance, in

agreement with Eq.(B2) must show amass decrease of ~1.6% with respectto initial mass of the dielectric ( )dieim .

At h.s.t 66223873 ≅≅ the voltage willbe VVap 3= and the decrease of mass

must be approximately equal toinitial mass of the dielectric. At

h.s.t 28829602 ≅≅ the voltage will beV.Vap 73= and the mass decrease

must be approximately equal to twicethe value of the initial mass of thedielectric. Finally at days.s,t 92000250 ≅=the voltage will be VVap 20=( amplitude ) and the mass decrease:

( ) Kg.m. diei 431084189 −≅− .

As showed in Fig.4, a electronicbalance can used to obtain the

a Duracap 86103 ( 100mm diameter, 5 mm thickness)b Aluminium ( 100 mm diameter, 1 mm thickness) (Surface finish: poli shed Duracap side)c Plexiglas ( 102 mm diameter, 3 mm thickness)

Fig.4

Counterbalance15 kg

HP3325A

Faraday Cage

Voltmeter

ab c

bc

Balance

26experimental data. However they mustbe confirmed in a mechanicaldynamometer. The presented experimentshows then how is possible to controlthe weight of the dielectric of thecapacitors. This possibility points tosome interesting systems as shown inFig. 5. Figures 5(a) and 5(b) show thegeneration of Lift Force . Figure 5(c)shows a new concept of motor : theGravitational Motor, also based on thegravity control. When the gravitational field of anobject changes, the changes rippleoutwards through spacetime. Theseripples are called gravitational radiationor gravitational waves. The existence of gravitationalwaves follows from the General Theoryof Relativity. In Einstein's theory ofgravity the gravitational wavespropagate at the speed of light. Just as electromagnetic waves(EM), gravitational waves (GW) toocarry energy and momentum from theirsources. Unlike EM waves, however,there is no dipole radiation in Einstein'stheory of gravity. The dominantchannel of emission is quadrupolar.But the existence of negativegravitational mass suggest thepossibility of dipole gravitationalradiation. This fact is highly relevantbecause now we can build agravitational wave transmitter togenerate detectable levels ofgravitational radiation. Gravitationalwaves are very suitable as a means oftransmitting information because oftheir low interaction an therefore lowscattering. In figure 5(d) we present theGravitational Radiation Transmitter, anew concept of transmitter that arisesfrom this new technology.

27

(a) (c)

(b) (d)

Fig. 5 - Schematic diagram of systems using gravity control:(a) and (b) The generation of Gravitational Lift Force. (c) The Gravitational Motor(d) The Gravitational Radiation Transmitter.

123

45

n

F = n F0 - (n+1)P0 ; P0 is the weight of each plate of the capacitor

F0 = mg g

Special dielectric ( mg )

ELF oscillator

The weight ofthis side of the

rotors isinverted due tothe ELF electric

field of thecapacitor

ELF oscillator

SemicircularPlate of theCapacitor

Special dielectric

LIFT

LIFT

Gravitationalwaves (GW)willbe radiated fromthe encapsulationas consequence

of the variation ofits gravitational

mass (due to ELFelectromagnetic

field).

ELF antennaencapsulated byspecial dielectric

GW GW

ELF oscillator

Metal

28

REFERENCES[1] Isham, C. J. (1975) Quantum gravity, an Oxford Symposium, OUP.[2] Isham, C.J., (1997) "Structural Problems Facing Quantum Gravity Theory'', in M, Francaviglia, G, Longhi, L, Lusanna, and E, Sorace, eds., Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation, 167-209, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997).[3] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E. (1969) Theorie du Champ, Ed.MIR, Moscow, Portuguese version (1974) Ed. Hemus, S.Paulo, p.35.[4] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E. (1969) Mecanique, Ed.MIR, Moscow, 15.[5] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.35.[6] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.36.[7] Beiser, A. (1967) Concepts of Modern Physics, McGraw-Hil l, Portuguese version (1969) Ed. Poligno, S.Paulo, p.151.[8] Schiff , L.I. (1981) Quantum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, p.54.[9] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.324.[10] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.357.[11] Landau, L.and Lifchitz,E.[3],p.p.358-359.[12] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.64.[13] Luminet, J. at al., (2003) Nature 425, 593–595.[14] Ellis, G.F.R (2003) Nature 425, 566–567.[15] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.440-441.[16] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.333.[17] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.331.[18] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.327.[19] Hawking, S.W (1971) MNRAS., 152, 75.[20] Carr, B.J.(1976) Astrophys.J., 206,10.[21] Beiser, A. (1967) Concepts of Modern Physics, McGraw-Hil l, Portuguese version (1969) Ed. Poligno, S.Paulo, p.223.[22] Alonso, M.and Finn, E.(1967)Fundamental University Physics,Addison-Wesley,Portuguese version (1972) Ed. Blücher, S.Paulo, p.79-80.[23] Alonso, M.and Finn, E.(1967)Fundamental University Physics,Addison-Wesley,Portuguese version (1972) Ed. Blücher, S.Paulo, p.89.