KI BOIS Community Action Foundation, Inc. and Forms/2016 KCAF Board Outcomes... · KI BOIS Community Action Foundation, Inc. Accomplishments, Coordination of Funds and Outcomes of

KI BOIS Community Action Foundation,

Inc.

Accomplishments, Coordination of Funds

and Outcomes of Efforts

January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016

KI BOIS Community Action Foundation, Inc.

Accomplishments, Coordination of Funds

and Outcomes of Efforts

January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016

Table of Contents Strategic Thinking for Long-Term Solutions ............................................................................................................................ 1

Delivering High-Quality, Accessible, and Well-Managed Services ......................................................................................... 3

Top State Management Accomplishment .......................................................................................................................... 3

Top Agency Management Accomplishments ..................................................................................................................... 3

Mobilizing Resources to Support Innovative Solutions .......................................................................................................... 4

Providing Positive Results for Vulnerable Populations ........................................................................................................... 5

Supportive Services for Veteran Families Program ................................................................................................................ 8

Goal 1: Low-income people become more self-sufficient. ................................................................................................... 10

National Performance Indicator 1.1 Employment ........................................................................................................... 10

National Performance Indicator 1.2 Employment Supports ............................................................................................ 12

National Performance Indicator 1.3 Employment Asset Enhancement and Utilization ................................................. 14

Goal 2: The conditions in which low-income people live are improved. ............................................................................. 16

National Performance Indicator 2.1 Community Improvement and Revitalization ........................................................ 16

National Performance Indicator 2.2 Community Quality of Life and Assets ................................................................... 19

National Performance Indicator 2.3 Community Engagement ....................................................................................... 21

Goal 3: Low-income people own a stake in their community. ............................................................................................. 22

National Performance Indicator 3.1 Community Enhancement through Maximum Feasible Participation .................. 22

National Performance Indicator 3.2 Community Empowerment through Maximum Feasible Participation ................. 23

Goal 4: Partnerships among supporters and providers of services to low-income people are achieved ............................ 25

National Performance Indicator 4.1 Expanding Opportunities through Community-Wide Partnerships ....................... 25

Goal 5: Agencies increase their capacity to achieve results ................................................................................................. 27

National Performance Indicator 5.1 Agency Development ............................................................................................. 27

Goal 6: Low-income people, especially vulnerable populations, achieve their potential by strengthening family and other

supportive environments...................................................................................................................................................... 30

National Performance Indicator 6.1 Independent Living ................................................................................................ 30

National Performance Indicator 6.2 Emergency Assistance ............................................................................................ 32

National Performance Indicator 6.3 Child and Family Development .............................................................................. 35

National Performance Indicator 6.4 Family Supports (Seniors, Disabled, and Caregivers) ............................................. 38

National Performance Indicator 6.5 Service Counts ........................................................................................................ 41

Demographics ....................................................................................................................................................................... 43

Logic Models ......................................................................................................................................................................... 45

1 | P a g e

2016 Accomplishments and Coordination of Funds

Strategic Thinking for Long-Term Solutions

a. Please describe an agency strategy which addresses a long-term solution to a

persistent problem affecting members of the low-income community.

Smart Start’s mission is to lead Oklahoma in coordinating an early childhood system

focused on strengthening families and school readiness for all children. Smart Start

Oklahoma trained all their Community Coordinators in the ABLe Change Framework

approach to systemic change. The KI BOIS Community Action Smart Start Kiamichi

Country (SSKC) Action Coordination Team (ACT) embraced this approach and began

doing system scans to identify their target for change. Several issues were identified.

The ACT reviewed and researched the issues and chose an issue where they believed

they could achieve and measure change. Their charge was to align and coordinate

services and supports in Haskell County then ultimately service area. The targeted

problem: Not all children are ready for school. The SSKC ACT priority: Not all families

are accessing developmental screenings/well child checkups for their children 0-6 years

old.

Multiple agencies serving the targeted population are part of the ACT. These agencies

graciously provided their existing parent literature for review. The terminology used was

not consistent nor specific regarding Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and

Treatment (EPSDT)/developmental screenings. With the assistance of the Oklahoma

Health Care Authority representative for the service area, the ACT revamped the

brochures to be clear and concise in their explanation of the need for

EPSDT/developmental screenings for all children. Both the local and tribal Head Start

programs were willing to change their parent literature. New parent brochures were

also shared with other providers along with an explanation of the need for updated

materials.

The Oklahoma Health Care Authority representative shared this project with her state

agency. They were very pleased with the ACT process in addressing the priority

problem. Their intent is to use this as a pilot project and replicate the solutions with

their representative throughout the state.

Address the following questions:

i. How did the agency identify the community need?

The SSKC Coordinator facilitated a systems scan for Haskell County using the

ABLe Change Framework Process. The SSKC Action Coordination Team (ACT)

developed a parent survey to be conducted at various locations and events in the

county, namely, enrollment day for Kindergarten. Survey results were compiled,

refined and analyzed. Through a root cause analysis, it was determined parents

were not taking their children for their EPSDT/developmental screening

appointments at the prescribed ages. The older the children the lower the

2 | P a g e

percentage of children receiving appropriate screenings. It appeared parents

were unaware of the importance of these screenings either in whole or that

screenings are prescribed for older children as well as infants and toddlers. It

was noted that providers may not have a full understanding of the EPSDT

process. It was also noted that community information may be confusing or

misleading for parents. In many cases the term “well child checks” were used.

Well child checks can be interpreted differently depending on the provider.

EPSDT/developmental screening appointments are crucial to ensure school

readiness.

ii. How were CSBG funds used to plan, manage, and/or develop the

approach?

CSBG funds were used to pay staff salaries, printing, and overhead for the

meeting space.

iii. What local partners were involved, and how did each contribute to the

program?

Parents – input/feedback

KI BOIS Head Start – SSKC ACT members, access to Head Start Parents,

literature

KI BOIS Community Action Foundation – SSKC ACT members, meeting

space, printing, fiscal agent.

Choctaw Nation Head Start - SSKC ACT member, access to Head Start,

literature

Stigler Health & Wellness Center – networking to access data on Early and

Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, & Treatment (EPSDT) rates in service area.

Working to increase EPSDT rates

Family First Medical Clinic - networking to access data on Early and Periodic

Screening, Diagnosis, & Treatment (EPSDT) rates in service area. Working to

increase EPSDT rates

Oklahoma Health Care Authority (OHCA) – SSKC ACT member, provides

technical support on systems work and data/statistical reports.

iv. What outcome indicators did the agency use to measure success?

The OHCA and The Health and Wellness Center will provide agency reports that

will reflect EPSDT rates for children 0-6 years old. Incremental reports will be

compared with each other as well as base line reports.

3 | P a g e

v. What outcomes have resulted in FY 2015? If no outcomes yet, when?

There have been no specific outcomes related to an increase in

EPSDT/developmental screening rates at this time. The SSKC ACT will start

reviewing reports in April 2017.

Delivering High-Quality, Accessible, and Well-Managed Services

b. Please describe what you consider to be the top management accomplishment

achieved by your State CSBG office during FY 2015. Show how responsible,

informed leadership led to effective and efficient management of the CSBG

program.

Top State Management Accomplishment:

The Oklahoma Department of Commerce (ODOC), working with the Oklahoma

Community Action Agencies, has convened a community needs assessment

work group to review and standardize specific components of the assessment

process and final document. The final product will be extremely helpful to

agencies and ODOC alike. Agencies will have a clear understanding regarding

the minimum requirements and monitors will be able to look for components in

the same place and order at each agency. This should also simplify training

since all agencies will have the same basic process and layout.

c. Please describe what you consider to be the top three management

accomplishments achieved by your agencies during FY 2015. Show how

responsible, informed leadership and effective, efficient processes led to high-

quality, accessible, and well-managed services.

Top Agency Management Accomplishments:

1. KI BOIS Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program received

CARF accreditation in February 2016. CARF stands for Commission on

Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities. CARF approved new standards for

accreditation of rapid rehousing and homelessness prevention (RRHP)

programs to support grantees of the Department of Veterans Affairs' SSVF

program. The KI BOIS SSVF Program was certified under these new

standards. Accreditation demonstrates that the SSVF program has opened its

service delivery and business processes to outside scrutiny in order to

improve quality for the veterans served. It ensures the program continues to

strive to represent and work at a level true to the KI BOIS Community Action

name and reputation. The certification process is a long, arduous process

requiring the time and energy of the entire SSVF program staff. Receiving

CARF accreditation allows the SSVF program to apply for a 3-year grant

renewal instead of applying annually. KI BOIS Community Action has one

other CARF accredited program; The Oaks Rehabilitative Services Center.

4 | P a g e

Mobilizing Resources to Support Innovative Solutions

d. Please describe how your agency addressed a cause or condition of poverty in

the community using an innovative or creative approach. Showcase how your

agency relied on mobilization and coordination of resources to help reach interim

and final outcomes. Demonstrate how CSBG “works” as it funds staff activities,

investments, or services to meet a community need. Include the following

elements:

i. Agency name (no acronyms please)


ii. Program name

Mobile Smiles Dental Van

iii. CSBG service category

Linkages, Health

iv. Description of program (capacity, duration, targeted population, etc)

Through community needs assessments, KI BOIS Community Action Foundation

(CAF) has repeatedly identified dental services as a need. KI BOIS CAF has

partnered with local county coalitions in two counties to bring the Oklahoma

Dental Foundation mobile dental van to eastern Oklahoma for the last two years.

For 2016, KI BOIS CAF committed CSBG funds to bring the mobile dental van to

three counties. The van spent one day in each county. The target population

was community residents with low incomes and no dental insurance. Depending

on the work needed by each patient, the dental van can accommodate 10 to 15

appointments each day.

v. How was the agency’s approach innovative or creative? Please be

specific.

For the first time, KI BOIS CAF was able to bring the local Federally Qualified

Health Center to the table. They were willing to provide a dentist and assistant to

work along-side the Dental Foundation’s staff. This increased the capacity each

day. KI BOIS CAF was also able to collaborate with two for-profit businesses to

provide meals and hotel rooms for the dental staff.

vi. Outcomes achieved (include the number of people enrolled and areas

affected)

Over three days the dental van served 39 patients and provided 212 procedures

thus improving the oral and physical health of the community residents treated.

vii. How were CSBG funds used? Please be specific.

CSBG funds were used to pay dental van fees, salaries, support salaries and

administrative expenses.

5 | P a g e

viii. What local partners were involved, and how did each contribute to the

program?

Partners include the following:

KI BOIS Community Action Foundation – provided staff time, scheduled

appointments, and cash to pay for the mobile dental van.

Oklahoma Dental Foundation – provided the mobile dental van, dentists and

assistants.

The Health and Wellness Center – scheduled appointments, provided a dentist

and assistant, and meals for dental staff.

Twin Lakes Hotel – provided two nights’ lodging for Oklahoma Dental

Foundation staff.

Kevin’s Restaurant – provided meals for dental staff.

Haskell County Health Department – provided referrals.

Volunteers - worked 36.5 hours.

Providing Positive Results for Vulnerable Populations

e. Please describe one youth-focused initiative that illustrates how CSBG funding

was used and coordinated with other programs and resources. Include the

following elements:

i. Description of initiative

Each year during May, KI BOIS Community Action sponsors events in each of its

base counties to celebrate Community Action Month and draw attention to

Community Action services available in their communities. Each County Office is

allowed to choose and plan their own event. The KI BOIS Community Action

Sequoyah County office chose to do a Shoes for Kids event. KI BOIS

Community Action partnered with the Journey Church and eight county schools

to provide new shoes for students. KI BOIS Community Acton staff went to each

school to meet with children, measure and fit them with a pair of brand new

shoes. The process made one think of Cinderella and the Prince as he slipped

the glass slipper on her foot to see if it was the perfect fit. The children were

smiling so brightly it appeared they were as happy as Cinderella.

6 | P a g e

ii. What local partners were involved, and how did each contribute to the

program?

KI BOIS Community Action – provided staff time to sort, prepare, deliver and fit

shoes to children.

Journey Church – donated over 1500 pair of shoes.

Public Schools – The following public schools provided time during the school

day for KI BOIS Community Action staff to come in and fit students with shoes;

Sallisaw, Marble City. Roland, Brushy, Belfonte, Gans, Moffet, and Vian

iii. Outcomes achieved (include the number of people enrolled and areas

affected)

One thousand four hundred sixty-two children were fitted with a new pair of

shoes to take home, call their own and provide protection for their precious feet.

iv. How were CSBG funds used? Please be specific.

CSBG funds are used to pay staff salaries.

f. Please describe one senior-focused initiative that illustrates how CSBG funding

was used and coordinated with other programs and resources. Include the

following elements:

i. Description of initiative

The National Foster Grandparent Volunteer Conference 2016 was held November

1 – 4, 2016, in the St Louis area in the small historic community of St. Charles. This

conference focused on the needs of volunteers and was a four day journey of

becoming more aware of how past and present trauma experiences can impact us

all in our daily functioning and the importance of self–care in our growth. The

underlying theme of the conference was our focus and attention will strengthen our

“heart, mind, body and soul.”

The KI BOIS Community Action Foster Grandparent Program (FGP) sent 20

volunteers, two staff members and one Advisory Council member to the conference.

Registration was $185 per person. As there are no funds in the budget to send

volunteers to a conference, the money had to be raised. The FGP volunteers

wasted no time and immediately started brainstorming how they would raise the

needed funds.

The volunteers were very creative and tireless in their fundraising efforts. In

Muldrow, Oklahoma, businesses donated goods for a large gift basket. Chances

were sold for the basket. In Mayes County, Oklahoma, one of the schools held

fundraisers to help their volunteers raise the money for their conference fees. Some

7 | P a g e

volunteers baked pies to sell. One volunteer, not making the trip, made two purses

and wallets on which her fellow volunteers sold chances. One church donated the

funds for a volunteer who is a member of their congregation. Two Cherokee Nation

Council Members made cash donations totaling $1500. The Muscogee Nation

made a 55 passenger bus available for the FGP Program to charter.

Upon arrival at the conference, volunteers were able to choose from a slate of

workshops including healthy lifestyles, the psychology of happiness, compassion

fatigue, emotional intelligence, Alzheimer’s, and a host of others. They were also

introduced to trauma informed care and the effects of trauma over a lifetime. When

the volunteers needed a break from sessions and workshops there was a craft room

full of fun things.

All attendees reported having a wonderful experience and returned recharged and

anxious to return to their volunteer post.

ii. What local partners were involved, and how did each contribute to the

program?

KI BOIS Community Action – paid travel fees for the Advisory Council member

and for the charter bus.

Muscogee Nation – provided access to a charter bus.

Cherokee Nation Council Members – cash donations.

Schools – fundraisers.

Muldrow Businesses – goods for gift basket.

Church – cash donation.

Volunteers – baked goods, home sewn items, lots of time and effort.

iii. Outcomes achieved (include the number of people enrolled and areas

affected)

Twenty volunteers, two FGP staff persons and one Advisory Council member

learned about events that can lead to a traumatic reaction, as well as the impact

trauma can have over a lifetime. Volunteers now have an understanding how

trauma informed care can be used to support the development of children. The

children assigned to these 20 FGP volunteers are better supported and equipped to

navigate their school and personal experiences.

iv. How were CSBG funds used? Please be specific.

CSBG funds were used to pay travel expenses for the Advisory Council member.

8 | P a g e

Supportive Services for Veteran Families Program –

“Working the way it was intended!”

Maria Rodriquez joined the US Armed Forces in California at age 18 and was a in the Army for 4

years and 3 months. During her time in the military she worked logistics and materials handling.

While enlisted she met and married another enlisted soldier. They stayed in the Army after

marrying and during that time had 2 children. After both she and her husband left the Army, they

had 2 more children. Following their discharge from the military, the family moved to Oklahoma,

specifically, the area where her husband’s family lived. Both she and her husband struggled while

adjusting to life outside the military. Maria was new in this area of the country and, as a Mexican

American, her first language is Spanish which created additional barriers. Maria and her husband

began to have marital issues which eventually lead to domestic violence. He kept her at home,

would not let her work and controlled every aspect of her life; from grocery shopping to presents

for the children and everything in between.

Maria tried to find a shelter with enough available beds for her and her children but was

unsuccessful. She made the decision to let her children stay with their grandparents while she

went to a homeless shelter so they could escape their abusive environment. On the day she left,

law enforcement had to come to the house to ensure her husband would not become violent with

her. When Maria came to the KI BOIS Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program,

she was a single veteran who had fled a terrible domestic violence situation. She was in a

homeless shelter and had voluntarily let her children stay with their grandparents so they would no

longer be in that toxic environment.

Once in the SSVF program, Maria made tremendous progress. Within a week she was moved

into emergency housing (out of the shelter) so she could have her children with her when they

were not in school. Within 45 days she was out of emergency housing and permanently housed.

The following month her children were able to move into the new home on a permanent basis.

The SSVF Program provided the initial assistance she needed to move into her own home. After

about 90 days, HUD Veterans Administration Supportive Housing (VASH) took over housing

payments. The SSVF Program continued to work with Maria to help her remove barriers and

achieve her goals.

Maria continued to thrive while in the Program. She was able to start working at the Veterans

Administration Medical Center (VAMC) in the Compensated Work Therapy Program. This was a

significant step for Maria. Her husband had not allowed her to work outside the home since her

discharge from the military. While she worked part time she saved her pay and was able to

purchase a vehicle. After four months of part time employment, she was hired on a permanent,

full time basis at the Jack C. Montgomery Medical Center. In less than one year, this single

mother with four children transitioned from being homeless with zero income to earning $16,000

per year and then on to earn $38,000 annually while living in her own home. Maria hopes she can

eventually find a suitable position with the VA in California that would allow her to transfer. In

doing so, she would be closer to her family.

9 | P a g e

Maria also worked with her Case Manager and a legal consultant, provided by the Program, to file

for a divorce. This effort was a success and she received her divorce decree. Her Case Manager

assisted her in developing a community based support system comprised primarily of women in

the Muskogee area. As she progressed through the Program, addressing barriers and achieving

goals, staff could see a mental and physical change in Maria that signaled she was moving toward

confidence and independence.

Maria and her children are still living in the home she moved into after being homeless. Maria and

her children are happy, healthy, and living in a loving home. She, and sometimes her children,

come by the office to drop off things they have made for the staff, to visit or even sometimes to get

advice or assistance with something new happening in her life. Maria is thriving as a single mom

in her independent life! One of the most amazing things was the joy she expressed at Christmas

time. After being in a controlling and abusive relationship for so many years, this was the first year

she was able to shop, choose and buy her children’s Christmas gifts.

Maria is a true success story and a great example of a Veteran utilizing the SSVF Program to

launch herself out of homelessness and directly into long-term, stable housing…permanent

housing. Housing which is providing a safe, loving environment for her and her children.

10 | P a g e

Outcome of Efforts, FY 2015

National Performance Indicators

Goal 1: Low-income people become more self-sufficient.

National Performance Indicator 1.1 Employment

The number and percentage of low-income participants who get a job or become self-employed as a result of Community Action Assistance, as measured by one or more of the following:

I.) Number of

Participants Enrolled in Program(s)

(#)

II.) Number of Participants Expected to

Achieve Outcome in Reporting

Period (Target) (#)

III.) Number of

Participants Achieving

Outcome in Reporting

Period (Actual) (#)

IV.) Percentage Achieving


Period [ III / II = IV ] (%)

Programs Reporting

A. Unemployed and obtained a job 68

68

68 100%

SSVF, ESG, PSH, CAPTAIN

B. Employed and maintained a job for at least 90 days

167

167

167 100%

SSVF, ESG, PSH, DD, CAPTAIN

C. Employed and obtained an increase in employment income and/or benefits

32

32

32 100% SSVF, ESG, PSH

D. Achieved "living wage" employment and/or benefits 0 0 0 0 None Reporting

Legend

SSVF - Supportive Services for Veteran Families, ESG - Emergency Shelter Grant, PSH - Permanent Supportive Housing, DD - Developmentally Disabled, CAPTAIN - Reporting Software

Comparison 2015-2016 2015 2016 % Change # Change

A. Unemployed and obtained a job 149 68 -54% -81

B. Employed and maintained a job for at least 90 days 175 167 -5% -8 C. Employed and obtained an increase in employment income and/or benefits 29 32 10% 3 D. Achieved "living wage" employment and/or benefits 0 0 0 0

Explanations/Comments A. There was no expansion in the Developmental Disabilities Program in 2016.

B. There was no expansion in the Developmental Disabilities Program in 2016. SSVF had an

increase of 20.

C. SSVF had an increase. HUD Permanent Supportive Housing had a decrease.

11 | P a g e

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

A. Unemployed and obtained ajob

B. Employed and maintained a jobfor at least 90 days

C. Employed and obtained anincrease in employment income

and/or benefits

D. Achieved "living wage"employment and/or benefits

1.1 Employment

2013 2014 2015 2016

12 | P a g e

National Performance Indicator 1.2 Employment Supports

The number of low-income participants for whom barriers to initial or continuous employment are reduced or eliminated through assistance from Community Action, as measured by one or more of the following:

I.) Number of Participants Enrolled in

Program(s) (#)

II.) Number of



Period (Target) (#)

Programs Reporting

A. Obtained skills/competencies required for employment

257

257 SSVF, DD, PSH, ESG, HSN, HSS

B. Completed ABE/GED and received certificate or diploma 110 2 HSN, HSS

C. Completed post-secondary education program and obtained certificate or diploma 42 42 HSN, HSS

D. Enrolled children in before or after school programs

17

17 HSN

E. Obtained care for child or other dependent 0 0 None Reporting

F. Obtained access to reliable transportation and/or driver's license

65

65 SSVF

G. Obtained health care services for themselves and/or family member

1,272

910

HALT, Rx, SSVF, CAPTAIN

H. Obtained and/or maintained safe and affordable housing

478

478 SSVF, ESG

I. Obtained food assistance 0 0 None Reporting

J. Obtained non-emergency LIHEAP energy assistance 0 0 None Reporting

K. Obtained non-emergency WX energy assistance

102

31 Housing

L. Obtained other non-emergency energy assistance (State/local/private energy programs. Do not include LIHEAP or WX)

478

478 SSVF, ESG

Legend

SSVF - Supportive Services for Veteran Families, ESG - Emergency Shelter Grant, PSH - Permanent Supportive Housing, DD - Developmentally Disabled, CAPTAIN - Reporting Software, HSN - Head Start North, HSS - Head Start North, Navigator - Health Insurance Enrollment Assistance, HALT - Haskell and Latimer Tobacco Project, Rx - Rx for Oklahoma

13 | P a g e

0100200300400500600700800900

1000

1.2 Employment Supports

2013 2014 2015 2016

Comparison 2015-2016 2015 2016

%

Change

#

Change

A. Obtained skills/competencies required for employment 268 257 -4% -11

B. Completed ABE/GED and received certificate or diploma 403 2 -100% -401

C. Completed post-secondary education program and obtained certificate or diploma 0

42 100% 42

D. Enrolled children in before or after school programs 17 17 0% 0

E. Obtained care for child or other dependent 0 0 0% 0

F. Obtained access to reliable transportation and/or driver's license 68

65 -4% -3

G. Obtained health care services for themselves and/or family member 721

910 26% 189

H. Obtained and/or maintained safe and affordable housing 370 478 29% 108

I. Obtained food assistance 0 0 0% 0

J. Obtained non-emergency LIHEAP energy assistance 0 0 0% 0

K. Obtained non-emergency WX energy assistance 27 31 15% 4

L. Obtained other non-emergency energy assistance (State/local/private energy programs. Do not include LIHEAP or WX) 370 478 29% 108

Explanations/Comments

A. Head Start parents decreased, Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) increased. B. Head Start parents were incorrectly reported last year. All parents accessing GED services were reported instead of only those completing and receiving diploma. C. Reporting Head Start parents for the first time on this line item. D. SSVF helped 3 fewer clients with obtaining transportation. G. Tobacco Help Line numbers increased, Rx and Navigator numbers decreased. H. & L.. SSVF and the Emergency Solutions Grants served additional clients. K. 4 additional homes were weatherized.

14 | P a g e

National Performance Indicator 1.3 Employment Asset Enhancement and Utilization The number and percentage of low-income households that achieve an increase in financial assets and/or financial skills as a result of Community Action assistance, and the aggregated amount of those assets and resources for all participants achieving the outcome, as measured by one or more of the following:

I.) Number of


(#)

II.) Number of

Participants Expected to


Period (Target) (#)

III.) Number of



Period (Actual) (#)

IV.) Percentage Achieving



V.) Aggregated

Dollar Amounts

(Payments, Credits, or

Savings) ($)

Programs Reporting

Enhancement A. Number and percent of participants in tax preparation programs who qualified for any type of Federal or State tax credit and the expected aggregated dollar amount of credits

1,051

1,051

1,051 100.0%

$1,139,332 VITA

Enhancement B. Number and percent of participants who obtained court-ordered child support payments and the expected annual aggregated dollar amount of payments 0 0 0 0

$ -

None Reporting

Enhancement C. Number and percent of participants who were enrolled in telephone lifeline and/or energy discounts with the assistance of the agency and the expected aggregated dollar amount of savings 0 0 0 0

$ -

None Reporting

Utilization D. Number and percent of participants demonstrating ability to complete and maintain a budget for over 90 days 347

347 347 100% N/A

KWS, PSH, SSVF, Budget Counseling

Legend

VITA - Volunteer Income Tax Assistance, KWS - Domestic Violence Programs, PSH - Permanent Supportive Housing

15 | P a g e


Enhancement A. Number and percent of participants in tax preparation programs who qualified for any type of Federal or State tax credit and the expected aggregated dollar amount of credits 929

1,051 13% 122

Enhancement B. Number and percent of participants who obtained court-ordered child support payments and the expected annual aggregated dollar amount of payments 0 0 0 0

Enhancement C. Number and percent of participants who were enrolled in telephone lifeline and/or energy discounts with the assistance of the agency and the expected aggregated dollar amount of savings 0 0 0 0

Utilization D. Number and percent of participants demonstrating ability to complete and maintain a budget for over 90 days 328

347 6% 19 Explanations/Comments A. Additional clients were served but their credits were less. D. Supportive Services for Veteran Families had an increase in client budget counseling.

0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

A. Tax Credits B. Child Support C. Telephone Lifeline D. Maintain a Budget

1.3 Employment Asset Enhancement and Utilization

2013 2014 2015 2016

16 | P a g e

Goal 2: The conditions in which low-income people live are improved.

National Performance Indicator 2.1 Community Improvement and Revitalization

Increase in, or safeguarding of, threatened opportunities and community resources or services for low-income people in the community as a result of Community Action projects/initiatives or advocacy with other public and private agencies, as measured by one or more of the following:

I.) Number

of Projects

or Initiatives

(#)

II.) Number of

Opportunities and/or

Community Resources

Preserved or Increased (#)

Programs Reporting

A. Jobs created, or saved, from reduction or elimination in the community

1

1 SSVF

B. Accessible "living wage" jobs created, or saved, from reduction or elimination in the community

1

1 SSVF

C. Safe and affordable housing units created in the community 0 0

None Reporting

D. Safe and affordable housing units in the community preserved or improved through construction, weatherization or rehabilitation achieved by Community Action activity or advocacy

2

31 Housing, Wx

E. Accessible safe and affordable health care services/facilities for low-income people created, or saved from reduction or elimination 1 175

Health & Wellness

Center F. Accessible safe and affordable child care or child development placement opportunities for low-income families created, or saved from reduction or elimination 0 0

None Reporting

G. Accessible before-school and after-school program placement opportunities for low-income families created, or saved from reduction or elimination 0 0

None Reporting

H. Accessible new or expanded transportation resources, or those that are saved from reduction or elimination, that are available to low-income people, including public or private transportation 0 0

None Reporting

I. Accessible or increased educational and training placement opportunities, or those that are saved from reduction or elimination, that are available for low-income people in the community, including vocational, literacy, and life skill training, ABE/GED, and post-secondary education 0 0

None Reporting

Legend SSVF - Supportive Services for Veteran Families, Housing - Housing Programs, Wx - Weatherization

17 | P a g e


A. Jobs created, or saved, from reduction or elimination in the community 1/1 1/1 0/0 0/0

B. Accessible "living wage" jobs created, or saved, from reduction or elimination in the community 1/1 1/1 0/0 0/0

C. Safe and affordable housing units created in the community 0 0 0 0

D. Safe and affordable housing units in the community preserved or improved through construction, weatherization or rehabilitation achieved by Community Action activity or advocacy 2/27 2/31 0%/15% 0/4

E. Accessible safe and affordable health care services/facilities for low-income people created, or saved from reduction or elimination 0 1/175 100% 1/175

F. Accessible safe and affordable child care or child development placement opportunities for low-income families created, or saved from reduction or elimination 0 0 0 0

G. Accessible before-school and after-school program placement opportunities for low-income families created, or saved from reduction or elimination 0 0 0 0

H. Accessible new or expanded transportation resources, or those that are saved from reduction or elimination, that are available to low-income people, including public or private transportation 0 0 0 0

I. Accessible or increased educational and training placement opportunities, or those that are saved from reduction or elimination, that are available for low-income people in the community, including vocational, literacy, and life skill training, ABE/GED, and post-secondary education 0 0 0 0


C. 4 more houses were weatherized. E. New clinic opened.

18 | P a g e

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

300

320

340

360

380

400

420

440

460

480

500

2.1 Community Improvement and Revitalization

2013 2014 2015 2016

19 | P a g e

National Performance Indicator 2.2 Community Quality of Life and Assets

The quality of life and assets in low-income neighborhoods are improved by Community Action initiative or advocacy, as measured by one or more of the following:

I.) Number

of Program

Initiatives or

Advocacy Efforts

(#)

II.) Number of

Community Assets,

Services, or Facilities

Preserved or

Increased (#)

Programs Reporting

A. Increases in community assets as a result of a change in law, regulation or policy, which results in improvements in quality of life and assets 0 0

None Reporting

B. Increase in the availability or preservation of community facilities 0 0

None Reporting

C. Increase in the availability or preservation of community services to improve public health and safety 0 0

None Reporting

D. Increase in the availability or preservation of commercial services within low-income neighborhoods 0 0

None Reporting

E. Increase in or preservation of neighborhood quality-of-life resources 0 0

None Reporting

Legend None Reporting


A. Increases in community assets as a result of a change in law, regulation or policy, which results in improvements in quality of life and assets 0 0 0 0

B. Increase in the availability or preservation of community facilities 0 0 0 0

C. Increase in the availability or preservation of community services to improve public health and safety 0 0 0 0

D. Increase in the availability or preservation of commercial services within low-income neighborhoods 0 0 0 0

E. Increase in or preservation of neighborhood quality-of-life resources 0 0 0 0


N/A

20 | P a g e

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

A. Community Assets B. Community Facilities C. Public health and safety D. Commercial Services E. Neighborhood quality oflife resources

2.2 Community Quality of Life and Assets

2013 2014 2015 2016

21 | P a g e

National Performance Indicator 2.3 Community Engagement

The number of community members working with Community Action to improve conditions in the community.

I.) Total Contribution by Community (#)

Programs Reporting

A. Number of community members mobilized by Community Action that participate in community revitalization and anti-poverty initiatives

4,137 All

B. Number of volunteer hours donated to the agency (This will be ALL volunteer hours)

148,387 All

Legend All - All programs report on these indicators


A. Number of community members mobilized by Community Action that participate in community revitalization and anti-poverty initiatives

5,116

4,137 -19% -979

B. Number of volunteer hours donated to the agency (This will be ALL volunteer hours)

153,038

148,387 -3% -4651


A & B. Foster Grandparent Program had more hours, Retired Senior Volunteer Program and County Offices had fewer volunteers and hours, Smart Start Kiamichi Country only operated for 6 months.

0

15000

30000

45000

60000

75000

90000

105000

120000

135000

150000

165000

180000

195000

A. Community Members Mobilized B. Volunteer Hours Donated

2.3 Community Engagement

2013 2014 2015 2016

22 | P a g e

Goal 3: Low-income people own a stake in their community.

National Performance Indicator 3.1 Community Enhancement through Maximum Feasible Participation The number of volunteer hours donated to Community Action

I.) Total Number of Volunteer Hours (#)

Programs Reporting

A. Total number of volunteer hours donated by low-income individuals to Community Action (This is ONLY the number of volunteer hours from individuals who are low-income)

125,876

FGP, HS, Board

Legend FGP - Foster Grandparent Program, HS - Head Start Thus, out of 148,387 total volunteer hours reported in 2.3B, 125,876

were from low income participants. Comparison 2015-2016 2015 2016

%

Change

#

Change

A. Total number of volunteer hours donated by low-income individuals to Community Action (This is ONLY the number of volunteer hours from individuals who are low-income)

127,192

125,876 -1% -1316


A. Fewer volunteers and hours through County Offices.

115000

120000

125000

130000

135000

140000

145000

150000

A. Low-income Volunteer Hours

3.1 Community Enhancement through Maximum Feasible Participation

2013 2014 2015 2016

23 | P a g e

National Performance Indicator 3.2 Community Empowerment through Maximum Feasible Participation The number of low-income people mobilized as a direct result of Community Action initiatives to engage in activities that support and promote their own well-being and that of their community, as measured by one or more of the following:

I.) Number of Low-Income People (#)

Programs Reporting

A. Number of low-income people participating in formal community organizations, government, boards or councils that provide input to decision-making and policy-setting through Community Action efforts

131

FGP, HS, RSVP, HSG, LC, SSKC,

KBBD B. Number of low-income people acquiring businesses in their community as a result of Community Action assistance 0

None Reporting

C. Number of low-income people purchasing their own home in their community as a result of Community Action assistance 0

None Reporting

D. Number of low-income people engaged in non-governance community activities or groups created or supported by Community Action

1,823

FGP, RSVP, HS, LC,

SSKC, HALT Legend FGP - Foster Grandparent Program, HS - Head Start, RSVP - Retired Senior Volunteer Program, HSG - Housing, LC - Latimer County, SSKC - Smart Start Kiamichi Country, KBBD - KI BOIS Board, HALT - The HALT Project


A. Number of low-income people participating in formal community organizations, government, boards or councils that provide input to decision-making and policy-setting through Community Action efforts

268

131 -51% -137

B. Number of low-income people acquiring businesses in their community as a result of Community Action assistance 0 0 0 0

C. Number of low-income people purchasing their own home in their community as a result of Community Action assistance 0 0 0 0

D. Number of low-income people engaged in non-governance community activities or groups created or supported by Community Action

2,497

1,823 -27% -674

Other – Housing Counseling 61 69 113% 8

24 | P a g e


A. Fewer low-income participants in Housing, Head Start, Retired Senior Volunteer Program, and the HALT Project no longer has an advisory board. D. Smart Start Kiamichi Country only operated 6 months. Other - more clients requested counseling.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

A. Formal CommunityOrganizations

B. Acquiring Businesses C. Purchasing a Home D. Non-gevernanceActivities

Housing Counseling

3.2 Community Empowerment through Maximum Feasible Participation

2013 2014 2015 2016

25 | P a g e

Goal 4: Partnerships among supporters and providers of services to low-income people are achieved

National Performance Indicator 4.1 Expanding Opportunities through Community-Wide Partnerships

The number of organizations, both public and private, that Community Action actively works with to expand resources and opportunities in order to achieve family and community outcomes.

I.) Unduplicated Number of

Organizations(#)

II.) Number of Partnerships(#)

Programs Reporting

A. Non-Profit Do not track 100 All B. Faith Based unduplicated 99 All C. Local Government 128 All D. State Government 13 80 All E. Federal Government 23 All F. For-Profit Business or Corporation 99 All G. Consortiums/Collaboration 81 All H. Housing Consortiums/Collaboration 21 All I. School Districts 148 All J. Institutions of postsecondary education/training

31 All

K. Financial/Banking Institutions 21 All L. Health Service Institutions 125 All M. State wide associations or collaborations 16 All

Tribal Nations 4 10 All

Sign Language Interpreters 2 2 All

Veteran Service Organizations 9 9 All

N. Total number of organizations and total number of partnerships CAAs work with to promote family and community outcomes

28 993

Legend All - All programs reported on these partnerships.

26 | P a g e

Comparison 2015-2016 2015 2016 % Change

#

Change

A. Non-Profit 149 100 -33% -49

B. Faith Based 101 99 -2% -2

C. Local Government 147 128 -13% -19

D. State Government 67 80 19% 13

E. Federal Government 30 23 -23% -7

F. For-Profit Business or Corporation 57 99 74% 42

G. Consortiums/Collaboration 38 81 113% 43

H. Housing Consortiums/Collaboration 9 21 133% 12

I. School Districts 160 148 -8% -12

J. Institutions of postsecondary education/training 29 31 7% 2

K. Financial/Banking Institutions 15 21 40% 6

L. Health Service Institutions 92 125 36% 33

M. State wide associations or collaborations 32 16 -50% -16

Tribal Nations 10 10 0% 0

Sign Language Interpreters 2 2 0% 0

Veteran Service Organizations 9 9 0% 0


There were changes in various categories across agency programs. The Supportive Services for Veteran Families Program continues to form new partnerships through their 24 county service area and accounts for the majority of growth in G. and H. Agency does not track unduplicated organizations.

0

50

100

150

200

250

4.1 Expanding Opportunities through Community-Wide Partnerships

2013 2014 2015 2016

27 | P a g e

Goal 5: Agencies increase their capacity to achieve results

National Performance Indicator 5.1 Agency Development The number of human capital resources available to Community Action that increase agency capacity to achieve family and community outcomes, as measured by one or more of the following:

I.) Resources in Agency (#)

Programs Reporting

A. Number of Certified Community Action Professionals

13 KCAF

B. Number of Nationally Certified ROMA Trainers 0 KCAF C. Number of Family Development Certified Staff 0 HS

D. Number of Child Development Certified Staff

168 HS

E. Number of staff attending trainings

739 All

F. Number of Board Members attending trainings

126

FGP, HSG, RSVP, HALT, VITA, SPG,

G. Hours of staff in trainings

11,327 All

H. Hours of Board Members in trainings

649

FGP, HSG, RSVP, HALT, VITA, SPG,

Certified Domestic & Sexual Violence Response Professional 2 KWS

Certified Community Transit Manager, Certified Master Technician (Transportation) 1 CCTM, 5 CMT KATS

Certified Red Cross CPR Trainers 2 OAKS

Legend

KCAF - Agency wide, HS - Head Start, All - All programs reported, RSVP - Retired Senior Volunteer Program, VITA - Volunteer Income Tax Assistance, Suicide Prevention Grant

28 | P a g e


A. Number of Certified Community Action Professionals

13 13 0% 0

B. Number of Nationally Certified ROMA Trainers 0 0 0% 0

C. Number of Family Development Certified Staff 0 0 0% 0

D. Number of Child Development Certified Staff 172 168 -2% -4

E. Number of staff attending trainings 1,013 739 -27% -274

F. Number of Board Members attending trainings 98 126 29% 28

G. Hours of staff in trainings 21,181 11,327 -47% -9854

H. Hours of Board Members in trainings 904 649 -28% -254.5

Certified Domestic & Sexual Violence Response Professional 2 2 0% 0

Certified Community Transit Manager, Certified Master Technician (Transportation) 1 CCTM, 5 CMT 1 CCTM, 5 CMT 0% 0

Certified Red Cross CPR Trainers 2 2 0% 0


D. Increase in Head Start staff with certification. E. & G. No expansion this year so many fewer new staff requiring new hire and programmatic training. F. Head Start reported more board members. H. Board members had fewer hours of training (including not as much ROMA NG and Organizational Standards).

29 | P a g e

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

A. CCAP B. ROMATrainers

C. FamilyDevelopment

D. ChildDevelopment

E. StaffAttendingTraining

F. BoardMembersAttendingTraining

H. Hours ofBoard

Members

CDSVRP Transit Red CrossCPR

5.1 Agency Development

2013 2014 2015 2016

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

G. Hours of Staff

5.1 Agency Development

2013 2014 2015 2016

30 | P a g e

Goal 6: Low-income people, especially vulnerable populations, achieve their potential by strengthening family and other supportive environments

National Performance Indicator 6.1 Independent Living The number of vulnerable individuals receiving services from Community Action who maintain an independent living situation as a result of those services:

I.) Number of Vulnerable Individuals Living Independently

(#)

Programs Reporting

A. Senior Citizens (seniors can be reported twice, once under Senior Citizens and again if they are disabled under Individuals with Disabilities, ages 55-over)

2,372

KCC, DD, PSH, RSVP, ESG, FGP,

SSVF, CAPTAIN

B. Individuals with Disabilities

Ages 0-17 48 DD, SSVF,

ESG 18-54 122 DD, PSH

55-over 650 KCC, DD,

PSH, SSVF

Age Unknown

929 SSVF, RSVP, FGP, KCC

TOTAL individuals with disabilities (automatically calculates)

1749

Other – Substance Abuse 550 Legend

KCC - KI BOIS Community Care, DD - Developmentally Disabled, RSVP - Retired Senior Volunteer Program, FGP - Foster Grandparent Company, RSVP - Retired Senior Volunteer Program, CAPTAIN - Outcome reporting software, PSH - Permanent Supportive Housing, SSVF - Supportive Services for Veteran Families, ESG - Emergency Solutions Grant


A. Senior Citizens (seniors can be reported twice, once under Senior Citizens and again if they are disabled under Individuals with Disabilities, ages 55-over) 990 2372 140% 1382

B. Individuals with Disabilities

0-17 35 48 37% 13

18-54 125 122 -2% -3

55-over 618 650 5% 32

Age Unknown 397 929 134% 532

TOTAL individuals with disabilities (automatically calculates)

1175

1749 49% 574

Other – Substance Abuse 550 100% 550


31 | P a g e

A. & B. Supportive Services for Veteran Families, Emergency Solutions Grant and The Oaks Rehabilitative Services Center had increases in clients meeting the above criteria. Both A. & B. were adjusted to align with numbers reported on Section G in the same respective categories. Other - Reporting substance abuse clients for the first time under 6.1.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

A. Senior Citizens Disabilities 0-17 Disabilities 18-54 Disabilities 55-over

Disabilities AgeUnknown

Total Disabilities Other

6.1 Independent Living

2013 2014 2015 2016

32 | P a g e

National Performance Indicator 6.2 Emergency Assistance

The number of low-income individuals served by Community Action who sought emergency assistance and the number of those individuals for whom assistance was provided, including such services as:

I.) Number of Individuals

Seeking Assistance (#)

II.) Number of Individuals

Receiving Assistance (#)

Programs Reporting

A. Emergency Food

7,192

7,192 Annual Report,

CAPTAIN B. Emergency fuel or utility payments funded by LIHEAP or other public and private funding sources

2,341

2,341

SSVF, ESG, PSH, CAPTAIN

C. Emergency Rent or Mortgage Assistance

2,106

2,106 SSVF, ESG, PSH,

CAPTAIN D. Emergency Car or Home Repair (i.e. structural, appliance, heating system, etc.)

65

65 SSVF

E. Emergency Temporary Shelter

433

433

SSVF, ESG, KWS, CAPTAIN

F. Emergency Medical Care

0

0 CAPTAIN

G. Emergency Protection from Violence

269

269 KWS

H. Emergency Legal Assistance

0 0 None Reporting

I. Emergency Transportation

148

148 SSVF

J. Emergency Disaster Relief

9

9 Outreach

Offices

K. Emergency Clothing

405

405 Annual Report,

CAPTAIN

Fans-3/Blankets-76 79 79 Annual Report,

SSVF

Vehicle Fuel 18 18 Annual Report,

SSVF Legend Annual Report - Agency report to Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies, CAPTAIN - Outcome Reporting Software, SSVF - Supportive Services for Veteran Families, ESG - Emergency Solutions Grant, PSH - Permanent Supportive Housing, KWS - KI BOIS Domestic Violence Programs,

33 | P a g e


A. Emergency Food

11,979 7,192 -40% -4787

B. Emergency fuel or utility payments funded by LIHEAP or other public and private funding sources

2,011 2,341 16% 330


1,251 2,106 68% 855

D. Emergency Car or Home Repair (i.e. structural, appliance, heating system, etc.)

68 65 -4% -3

E. Emergency Temporary Shelter

587 433 -26% -154

F. Emergency Medical Care

1 0 -100% -1

G. Emergency Protection from Violence

218 269 23% 51

H. Emergency Legal Assistance 0 0 0% 0

I. Emergency Transportation

63 148 135% 85

J. Emergency Disaster Relief

7 9 29% 2

K. Emergency Clothing

534 405 -24% -129

Fans 3/Blankets 76 47 79 68% 32

Vehicle Fuel 13 18 38% 5


A. The Stigler food pantry was open for a full year therefore serving additional clients. The Sequoyah County food boxes were moved to 6.4 F since they are more of a maintenance food service than emergency service. Instead of using the 3.14 household multiplier, 1.5 was used so the number of individuals would not be over inflated. B., C. & G. There was an increase in clients for Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF), Emergency Solutions Grant, and Permanent Supportive Housing. D. Three fewer clients needed emergency car repair. E. Last year the 3.14 formula was used to calculate the number of individuals. This year the actual number of individuals was used. F. There were no requests for emergency medical care. G. There was an increase in clients for SSVF and the Domestic Violence Programs. I. Included domestic violence clients receiving transportation for the first time on this line item. J. Fewer disaster relief clients. K. Fewer requests for clothing. There was no coat/clothing give away this year. Last year's event was a onetime event. Other - Increase in SSVF clients.

34 | P a g e

0500

100015002000250030003500400045005000550060006500700075008000850090009500

1000010500110001150012000

A. Emergency Food B. Emergency fuel or utility paymentsfunded by LIHEAP or other public and

private funding sources


6.2 Emergency Assistance

2013 2014 2015 2016

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

6.2 Emergency Assistance

2013 2014 2015 2016

35 | P a g e

National Performance Indicator 6.3 Child and Family Development

The number and percentage of all infants, children, youth, parents, and other adults participating in developmental or enrichment programs who achieve program goals, as measured by one or more of the following:

I.) Number of


(#)

II.) Number of

Participants Expected to


Period (Target) (#)

III.) Number of



Period (Actual) (#)

IV.)Percentage Achieving



Programs Reporting

Infant and Child A. Infants and children obtain age appropriate immunizations, medical, and dental care

2,422

2,157 2,422 112.3% HS, BTS

Infant and Child B. Infant and child health and physical development are improved as a result of adequate nutrition

3,167

2,902 3,167 109.1%

HS, CACFP, BPP

Infant and Child C. Children participate in pre-school activities to develop school readiness skills

6,591

6,326 6,591 104.2%

HS, RAR, SBE

Infant and Child D. Children who participate in pre-school activities are developmentally ready to enter Kindergarten or 1st Grade

817

817 817 100.0% HS

Youth E. Youth improve health and physical development

110

110 110 100.0%

SWAT, YAB, HALT,

CAMP

Youth F. Youth improve social/emotional development

168

168 168 100.0%

CASA, SS4TS, YAB

Youth G. Youth avoid risk taking behavior for a defined period of time

60

60 60 100.0%

SWAT, SS4TS, KWS

Youth H. Youth have reduced involvement with criminal justice system 0 0 0 0

None Reporting

Youth I. Youth increase academic, athletic, or social skills for school success

756

756 756 100.0%

KWS, BTS, SS4TS, WTRW

Adult J. Parents and other adults learn and exhibit improved parenting skills

1,724

1,724 1,724 100.0% HS

Adult K. Parents and other adults learn and exhibit improved family functioning skills

1,724

1,724 1,724 100.0% HS

Child and Adult Care Food Program Reimbursement

$ 1,664,837.85 0% CACFP

Legend

36 | P a g e

HS - Head Start, BTS - Back to School Events, CACFP - Child and Adult Care Food Program, BPP - Backpack Food Program, Fit 4 Fun - Smart Start Kiamichi Country physical activity program for young children, RAR - Raising a Reader Literacy Program, R4R - Read for the Record, SBE - Story Book Exchange, SWAT - Students Working Against Tobacco, YAB - Youth Advisory Board, HALT - The HALT Project, CAMP - Youth the HALT Project work with during summer camp, CASA - Court Appointed Special Advocates, SS4TS - Stigler Stand for The Silent anti-bullying chapter, KWS - KI BOIS Domestic Violence Programs, WTRW - Welcome to the Real World

Comparison 2015-2016 2015 2016 % Change # Change Infant and Child A. Infants and children obtain age appropriate immunizations, medical, and dental care 2659 2,422 -9% -237 Infant and Child B. Infant and child health and physical development are improved as a result of adequate nutrition 2846 3,167 11% 321 Infant and Child C. Children participate in pre-school activities to develop school readiness skills 6612 6,591 0% -21 Infant and Child D. Children who participate in pre-school activities are developmentally ready to enter Kindergarten or 1st Grade 868 817 -6% -51 Youth E. Youth improve health and physical development 240 110 -54% -130 Youth F. Youth improve social/emotional development 235 168 -29% -67 Youth G. Youth avoid risk taking behavior for a defined period of time 182 60 -67% -122 Youth H. Youth have reduced involvement with criminal justice system 0 0 0% 0 Youth I. Youth increase academic, athletic, or social skills for school success 978 756 -23% -222 Adult J. Parents and other adults learn and exhibit improved parenting skills 1735 1,724 -1% -11

Adult K. Parents and other adults learn and exhibit improved family functioning skills 1735

1,724 -1% -11 Child and Adult Care Food Program Reimbursement 185 Homes

$ 1,539,969.06

$ 1,664,837.85 8% 124,868.79

37 | P a g e

Explanations/Comments A. & I. Back to School student numbers were down by 205. B. Increase in children at day care homes benefitting from Child and Adult Care Food Program. A., C. & D. There were slightly fewer Head Start children. E. Fewer youth attended camp. F. There was no teen conference. G. There was no teen dating violence awareness event. J. & K. There were slightly fewer Head Start parents.

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

6.3 Child and Family Development

2013 2014 2015 2016

1000000

1150000

1300000

1450000

1600000

1750000

1900000

Child and Adult Care Food Program Reimbursement

6.3 Child and Family DevelopmentChild and Adult Care Food Program

2013 2014 2015 2016

38 | P a g e

National Performance Indicator 6.4 Family Supports (Seniors, Disabled, and Caregivers)

The number of low-income individuals served by Community Action who sought emergency assistance and the number of those individuals for whom assistance was provided, including such services as:

I.) Number of

Individuals Seeking

Assistance (#)

II.) Number of

Individuals Receiving Assistance

(#)

Programs Reporting

A. Enrolled children in before or after school programs 0 0

None Reporting

B. Obtained care for child or other dependent 15

15 ADC

C. Obtained access to reliable transportation and/or driver's license 0 0

None Reporting

D. Obtained health care services for themselves and/or family member

1,056

1,056

OAKS KCC, CAPTAIN

E. Obtained and/or maintained safe and affordable housing

637

637

PSH, ESG, DD, SSVF

F. Obtained food assistance 4,041 4,041 SC, SSVF,

BPP G. Obtained non-emergency LIHEAP energy assistance 0 0

None Reporting

H. Obtained non-emergency WX energy assistance 0 0

None Reporting

I. Obtained other non-emergency energy assistance (State/local/private energy programs. Do not include LIHEAP or WX)

467

467 SSVF, ESG

Transportation - Elderly Rides

114,928

114,928 KATS

Transportation -Disabled & Disabled Rides

37,741

37,741 KATS


50,148

50,148 KATS Legend ADC - Adult Day Care, OAKS - The Oaks Rehabilitative Services Center, PSH - Permanent Supportive Housing, DD - Developmentally Disabled, SSVF - Supportive Services for Veteran Families, ESG - Emergency Solutions Grant, SC – Sequoyah County, KATS - KI BOIS Area Transit System

39 | P a g e


A. Enrolled children in before or after school programs 0 0 0 0

B. Obtained care for child or other dependent

42 15 -64% -27

C. Obtained access to reliable transportation and/or driver's license 0 0 0 0

D. Obtained health care services for themselves and/or family member

1,108 1,056 -5% -52

E. Obtained and/or maintained safe and affordable housing

632 637 1% 5

F. Obtained food assistance 0 4,041 100% 4041

G. Obtained non-emergency LIHEAP energy assistance 0 0 0 0

H. Obtained non-emergency WX energy assistance 0 0 0 0

I. Obtained other non-emergency energy assistance (State/local/private energy programs. Do not include LIHEAP or WX)

393 467 19% 74


114,533 114,928 0% 395

Transportation -Elderly & Disabled Rides

34,342 37,741 10% 3399


46,008 50,148 9% 4140


B. Adult Day Care has been reduced to only one location. D. Slight reduction in substance abuse clients. E. Slight increases and decreases across all programs reported on this line. F. The Sequoyah County food boxes were moved from 6.2 A since they are more of a maintenance food service than emergency service. Instead of using the 3.14 household multiplier, 1.5 was used so the number of individuals would not be over inflated. I. Increase in clients for Supportive Services for Veteran Families and Emergency Solutions Grant. Other - Requests for rides increased.

40 | P a g e

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

6.4 Family Supports (Seniors, Disabled, and Caregivers)

2013 2014 2015 2016

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

Transportation - Elderly Rides Transportation -Elderly & Disabled Rides Transportation - Elderly Rides

6.4 Family Supports - Transportation

2013 2014 2015 2016

41 | P a g e

National Performance Indicator 6.5 Service Counts

The number of services provided to low-income individuals and/or families, as measured by one or more of the following:

I.) Number of Services (#)

Programs Reporting

A. Food Boxes 4,795

Annual Report,

CAPTAIN B. Pounds of Food

110,578 Annual Report

C. Units of Clothing

129 Annual Report

D. Rides Provided

673,950 KATS E. Information and Referral Calls

None

Reporting

Legend

Annual Report - Annual report to the Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies, CAPTAIN - Outcome reporting software, KATS - KI BOIS Area Transit System


A. Food Boxes

3,815

4,795 26% 980

B. Pounds of Food

137,534

110,578 -20% -26956

C. Units of Clothing

504

129 -74% -375

D. Rides Provided

719,095

673,950 -6% -45145

E. Information and Referral Calls

210 0 -100% -210


A. Stigler food pantry open for the full year. B. Decrease in the weight of food. C. There was no coat/clothing give away this year. Last year's event was a onetime event. D. Fewer requests for rides. E. Agency did not participate in the Navigator Program. Agency does not track other referrals.

42 | P a g e

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

A. Food Boxes C. Units of Clothing E. Information and Referral Calls

6.5 Service Counts

2013 2014 2015 2016

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

450000

500000

550000

600000

650000

700000

750000

800000

B. Pounds of Food D. Rides Provided

6.5 Service Counts

2013 2014 2015 2016

43 | P a g e

Demographics

1. Name of Agency OK

2a. Total Non-CSBG Resources Reported in Section F 40,451,696$

2b. Total Amount of CSBG Funds allocated 440,131$

Total Resources for FY2016 (2a+2b) 40,891,828$

3. Total unduplicated number of persons about whom one or more characteristics were obtained:9,859

4. Total unduplicated number of persons about whom no characteristics were obtained: 2,465

5. Total unduplicated number of families about whom one or more characteristics were obtained:6,929

6. Total unduplicated number of families about whom no characteristics were obtained: 1,528

7. Gender Number of Persons* 13. Family Size Number of Families***

a. Male 4,304 a. One 2,220

b. Female 5,142 b. Two 725

TOTAL* 9,446 c. Three 312

d. Four 187

8. Age Number of Persons* e. Five 72

a. 0-5 2,417 f. Six 46

b. 6-11 711 g. Seven 12

c. 12-17 568 h. Eight or more 5

d. 18-23 576 TOTAL*** 3,579

e. 24-44 2,123

f. 45-54 1,051 14. Source of Family IncomeNumber of Families***

g. 55-69 1,472 a. Unduplicated # Families Reporting

h. 70+ 909 One or More Sources of Income 4,964

TOTAL* 9,827 b. Unduplicated # Families Reporting

Zero Income 1,014

9. Ethnicity/Race Number of Persons*

I. Ethnicity TOTAL*** Unduplicated # Families Reporting

a. Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origins 484 One or More Sources of Income or Zero Income.5,978

b. Not Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origins 8,967 Below, please report the total # of Families

TOTAL* 9,451 identifying the applicable sources of income

c. TANF 148

II. Race d. SSI 674

a. White 6,863 e. Social Security 1,318

b. Black or African American 363 f. Pension 383

c. American Indian or Alaska Native 1,751 g. General Assistance 1,017

d. Asian 16 h. Unemployment Insurance 84

e. Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 10 i. Employment + Other 74

f. Other 225 j. Employment Only 3,061

g. Multi-Race (any two or more of the above)223 k. Other 640

TOTAL* 9,451 l. Total (items c-k) 7,399


44 | P a g e

10. Education Levels of Adults #)Number of Persons* 15. Level of Family IncomeNumber of Families***

(# for adults 24 years or Older only) ((% of HHS Guideline)

a. 0-8 271 a. Up to 50% 2,078

b. 9-12/Non-Graduate 795 b. 51% to 75% 952

c. High School Graduate/GED 2,190 c. 76% to 100% 914

d. 12+ Some Post Secondary 397 d. 101% to 125% 499

e. 2 or 4 years College Graduate 164 e. 126% to 150% 243

TOTAL** 3,817 f. 151% to 175% 188

g. 176% to 200% 159

11. Other Characteristics Number of Persons* h. 201% and over 1,079

Yes No Total* TOTAL*** 6,112

a. Health Insurance 5,040 3,187 8,227

b. Disabled 1,749 7,449 9,198 16. Housing Number of Families***

a. Own 1,108

12. Family Type Number of Families*** b. Rent 1,783

a. Single Parent Female 1,088 c. Homeless 517

b. Single Parent Male 118 d. Other† 1,484

c. Two Parent Household 1,334 TOTAL*** 4,892

d. Single Person 2,220 e. †Please describe housing situations included in 16.d Other:

e. Two Adults NO Children 727

f. Other 334

TOTAL*** 5,821

NOTE: Provide comments below

Program Participant Characteristics COMMENTS

3. & 4. Several programs including Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF), Emergency Solutions

Grant (ESG), Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) and the food banks had an increase in clients.

4. A multiplier of 1.5 was used on families receiving food boxes to extrapolate the number of individuals.

8.b Back to School events in 2 counties recorded minimal demographics for the first time. 8.c CAPTAIN

numbers showed an increase of 300 in this category. At this time we are unsure of the source(s) of the

increase.

9.I.a This is a difference of 15 or 3.2%. Given the influx of Hispanic persons this is not significant enough

to research. 9.II.b This is a difference of 9 or 2.5%, this is not significant enough to research. d. There

was a mistake in the Asian and Native American population reported by the SSVF Program. The numbers

were reported as Asian 105 and Native American 1. These should have been reversed. It should have

been reported as Asian 1 and NA 105. g. This is a difference of 6 or 2.7%, this is not significant enough to

research.

10.a & c. CAPTAIN numbers showed an increasein both these categories. The substance abuse facility

reported a large increase in category a. The agency has seen an increase in families requesting

assistance for the first time. It is believed that is responsible for a majority of the c. category increase.

12. a & c Head Start previously did not track single parent families by gender. As of this year they do and

thus it was reported on Section G.

13. e, f, g & h These are all minimal increases and will not be researched. e. shows the same number as

last year....therefore should require no explanation.

14.d There was a general increase over several programs. h. There was a general decrease over several

programs. i. The substance abuse facility reported an increase of 39 in this category.

15. e & g These are increases of 8 and 14 respectively, this is not significant enough to research.

Living with family, living with friends,

Psychiatric Hospital, Substance Abuse * The sum of this category should not exceed the value of Item 3

**The sum of this category should not exceed the value of Items 8e-h

*** The sum of this category should not exceed the value of Item 5

45 | P a g e

Logic Models

Ne

ed

Serv

ice

/

Act

ivit

y O

utc

om

e

Ou

tco

me

Ind

icat

or

Re

sult

s*

Me

asu

resm

en

t

Too

l

Dat

a So

urc

e, D

ata

Co

lle

ctio

n

Pro

ced

ure

s, P

ers

on

ne

l

(Wh

ere

, Ho

w, W

ho

)

Fre

qu

en

cy o

f D

ata

Co

lle

ctio

n a

nd

Re

po

rtin

g

*A

ctu

al

res

ult

s a

re o

nly

en

tere

d i

nto

th

is c

olu

mn

AF

TE

R s

erv

ice

s a

re p

rovi

de

d;

ho

we

ver,

yo

u c

an

us

e t

his

co

lum

n t

o r

eco

rd p

roje

cte

d s

ucc

es

s r

ate

s i

f d

es

ire

d,

an

d l

ate

r re

pla

ce t

he

m w

ith

act

ua

l re

su

lts

.

RO

MA

Lo

gic

Mo

de

l fr

om

th

e N

ati

on

al

Pe

er-

to-P

ee

r R

OM

A T

rain

ing

an

d C

ert

ific

ati

on

Pro

ject

RO

MA

LO

GIC

MO

DEL

Org

aniz

atio

n:

KI

BO

IS C

om

mu

nit

y A

ctio

n F

ou

nd

atio

n, I

nc.

Pro

gram

: F

oo

d P

antr

ies

Mis

sio

n:

KI

BO

IS C

om

mu

nit

y A

ctio

n F

ou

nd

atio

n, I

nco

rpo

rate

d is

a co

mm

un

ity

bas

ed o

rgan

izat

ion

ded

icat

ed t

o e

limin

atin

g th

e

cau

ses

of

po

vert

y an

d b

ette

rin

g th

e ec

on

om

ic, m

enta

l, p

hys

ical

and

so

cial

wel

l bei

ng

of

all p

eop

le, m

ost

imp

ort

antl

y th

e

dis

adva

nta

ged

, by

uti

lizin

g ef

fect

ive

coo

rdin

atio

n a

nd

adm

inis

trat

ion

of

avai

lab

le r

eso

urc

es a

nd

info

rmat

ion

.

Pro

xy O

utc

om

e:

Ind

ivid

ual

s

and

fam

ilies

wit

h lo

w-

inco

mes

nee

d

nu

trit

iou

s

foo

d t

o

pre

ven

t

hu

nge

r.

Nu

trit

iou

s

foo

d b

oxe

s

will

be

pro

vid

ed a

t

3 a

gen

cy

loca

tio

ns

to

60

0

ind

ivid

ual

s

and

fam

ilies

.

Ind

ivid

ual

s

and

fam

ilies

hav

e an

adeq

uat

e

sup

ply

of

nu

trti

on

al

foo

d t

o

pre

ven

t

hu

nge

r o

n

a tem

po

rary

bas

is.

60

0 o

f 6

25

ind

ivid

ual

s

and

fam

ilies

or

96

%

req

ues

tin

g

foo

d d

uri

ng

the

cale

nd

ar

year

20

16

will

rec

eive

a n

utr

itio

us

foo

d b

ox.

82

6

ind

ivid

ual

s

and

fam

ilies

rece

ived

a

min

imu

m o

f

on

e fo

od

bo

x d

uri

ng

the

cale

nd

ar

year

20

16

.

Foo

d P

antr

y

Inta

kes,

CA

PTA

IN, C

SBG

-

IS

Foo

d P

antr

y In

take

s ar

e

colle

cted

by

Pan

try

staf

f

at t

he

tim

e o

f se

rvic

e

then

giv

en t

o t

he

CA

PTA

IN d

ata

entr

y

staf

f, C

AP

TAIN

Rep

ort

s

pri

nte

d b

y th

e C

AP

TAIN

Ad

min

istr

ato

r, C

SBG

-IS

com

pile

d b

y th

e

Dir

ecto

r o

f P

lan

nin

g.

Dat

a is

co

llect

ed a

s se

rvic

e is

pro

vid

ed a

nd

en

tere

d in

to

CA

PTA

IN, a

t a

min

imu

m,

mo

nth

ly.

CA

PTA

IN r

epo

rts

are

revi

ewed

mo

nth

ly, C

SBG

-IS

is

revi

ewed

an

nu

ally

.

Family

Community

Agency

46 | P a g e

Ne

ed

Serv

ice

/

Act

ivit

y O

utc

om

e

Ou

tco

me

Ind

icat

or

Re

sult

s*

Me

asu

resm

en

t

Too

l

Dat

a So

urc

e, D

ata

Co

lle

ctio

n

Pro

ced

ure

s, P

ers

on

ne

l

(Wh

ere

, Ho

w, W

ho

)

Fre

qu

en

cy o

f D

ata

Co

lle

ctio

n a

nd

Re

po

rtin

g

RO

MA

Lo

gic

Mo

de

l fr

om

th

e N

ati

on

al

Pe

er-

to-P

ee

r R

OM

A T

rain

ing

an

d C

ert

ific

ati

on

Pro

ject

*A

ctu

al

res

ult

s a

re o

nly

en

tere

d i

nto

th

is c

olu

mn

AF

TE

R s

erv

ice

s a

re p

rovi

de

d;

ho

we

ver,

yo

u c

an

us

e t

his

co

lum

n t

o r

eco

rd p

roje

cte

d s

ucc

es

s r

ate

s i

f d

es

ire

d,

an

d l

ate

r re

pla

ce t

he

m w

ith

act

ua

l re

su

lts

.

RO

MA

LO

GIC

MO

DEL

Org

aniz

atio

n:

KI

BO

IS C

om

mu

nit

y A

ctio

n F

ou

nd

atio

n, I

nc.

Pro

gram

: D

enta

l Car

e

Mis

sio

n:

KI

BO

IS C

om

mu

nit

y A

ctio

n F

ou

nd

atio

n, I

nco

rpo

rate

d

is a

co

mm

un

ity

bas

ed o

rgan

izat

ion

ded

icat

ed t

o e

limin

atin

g th

e

cau

ses

of

po

vert

y an

d b

ette

rin

g th

e ec

on

om

ic, m

enta

l, p

hys

ical

and

so

cial

wel

l bei

ng

of

all p

eop

le, m

ost

imp

ort

antl

y th

e

dis

adva

nta

ged

, by

uti

lizin

g ef

fect

ive

coo

rdin

atio

n a

nd

adm

inis

trat

ion

of

avai

lab

le r

eso

urc

es a

nd

info

rmat

ion

.

Pro

xy O

utc

om

e:

Ind

ivid

ual

s

and

fam

ilies

wit

h lo

w-

inco

mes

nee

d a

cces

s

to d

enta

l

care

to

imp

rove

thei

r o

ral

hyg

ien

e.

30

ind

ivid

ual

s

will

rec

eive

limit

ed

den

tal c

are

at n

o c

ost

.

Ind

ivid

ual

s

rece

ive

den

tal c

are

ther

eby

imp

rovi

ng

thei

r o

ral

hyg

ien

e

and

gen

eral

hea

lth

.

30

of

35

ind

ivid

ual

s

or

86

%

req

ues

tin

g

serv

ices

will

rece

ive

nee

ded

den

tal c

are

at 3

eve

nts

in 3

dif

fere

nt

cou

nti

es

du

rin

g th

e

cale

nd

ar

year

20

16

.

39

ind

ivid

ual

s

rece

ived

21

2

serv

ices

at

3 e

ven

ts in

3 d

iffe

ren

t

cou

nti

es

du

rin

g

cale

nd

ar

20

16

.

Mo

bile

Den

tal

Van

In

take

s,

CA

PTA

IN. C

SBG

-

IS

Den

tal v

an in

take

s

colle

cted

by

Okl

aho

ma

Den

tal F

ou

nd

atio

n

(OD

F) s

taff

an

d K

I B

OIS

ou

trea

ch s

taff

th

en ,

Mo

bile

Sm

iles

Rep

ort

s

gen

erat

ed b

y th

e O

DF,

CA

PTA

IN r

epo

rts

gen

erat

ed b

y th

e

CA

PTA

IN A

dm

inis

trat

or,

CSB

G-I

S co

mp

iled

by

the

Dir

ecto

r o

f

Pla

nn

ing.

Dat

a is

co

llect

ed a

s se

rvic

e is

pro

vid

ed a

nd

en

tere

d in

to

CA

PTA

IN a

t th

e co

mp

leti

on

of

each

eve

nt.

CA

PTA

IN r

epo

rts

are

revi

ewed

mo

nth

ly, C

SBG

-

IS is

rev

iew

ed a

nn

ual

ly.

Family

Community

Agency

47 | P a g e

Ne

ed

Serv

ice

/

Act

ivit

y O

utc

om

e

Ou

tco

me

Ind

icat

or

Re

sult

s*

Me

asu

resm

en

t

Too

l

Dat

a So

urc

e, D

ata

Co

lle

ctio

n

Pro

ced

ure

s, P

ers

on

ne

l

(Wh

ere

, Ho

w, W

ho

)

Fre

qu

en

cy o

f D

ata

Co

lle

ctio

n a

nd

Re

po

rtin

g

*Act

ua

l re

sult

s a

re o

nly

en

tere

d i

nto

th

is c

olu

mn

AFT

ER s

erv

ice

s a

re p

rovi

de

d; h

ow

eve

r, y

ou

ca

n u

se t

his

co

lum

n t

o r

eco

rd p

roje

cte

d s

ucc

ess

ra

tes

if d

esi

red

, an

d l

ate

r re

pla

ce t

he

m w

ith

act

ua

l re

sult

s.

RO

MA

Log

ic M

odel

fro

m t

he N

atio

nal P

eer-

to-P

eer

RO

MA

Tra

inin

g an

d Ce

rtif

icat

ion

Pro

ject

RO

MA

LO

GIC

MO

DEL

Org

aniz

atio

n:

KI

BO

IS C

om

mu

nit

y A

ctio

n F

ou

nd

atio

n, I

nc.

Pro

gram

: R

x fo

r O

klah

om

a

Mis

sio

n:

KI

BO

IS C

om

mu

nit

y A

ctio

n F

ou

nd

atio

n, I

nco

rpo

rate

d is

a

com

mu

nit

y b

ased

org

aniz

atio

n d

edic

ated

to

elim

inat

ing

the

cau

ses

of

po

vert

y an

d b

ette

rin

g th

e ec

on

om

ic, m

enta

l, p

hys

ical

an

d s

oci

al w

ell

bei

ng

of

all p

eop

le, m

ost

imp

ort

antl

y th

e d

isad

van

tage

d, b

y u

tiliz

ing

effe

ctiv

e co

ord

inat

ion

an

d a

dm

inis

trat

ion

of

avai

lab

le r

eso

urc

es a

nd

info

rmat

ion

.

Pro

xy O

utc

om

e:

Ind

ivid

ual

s,

incl

ud

ing

sen

ior

citi

zen

s, w

ith

low

-in

com

es

nee

d

pre

scri

bed

med

icat

ion

to

mai

nta

in t

hei

r

hea

lth

.

Rx

for

Okl

aho

ma

Inta

kes

are

colle

cted

by

Rx

staf

f at

th

e ti

me

of

serv

ice

then

giv

en t

o

the

CA

PTA

IN d

ata

entr

y

staf

f, C

AP

TAIN

Rep

ort

s

pri

nte

d b

y th

e C

AP

TAIN

Ad

min

istr

ato

r, C

SBG

-IS

com

pile

d b

y th

e

Dir

ecto

r o

f P

lan

nin

g.

Dat

a is

co

llect

ed a

s se

rvic

e is

pro

vid

ed a

nd

en

tere

d in

to

CA

PTA

IN, a

t a

min

imu

m,

mo

nth

ly.

CA

PTA

IN r

epo

rts

are

revi

ewed

mo

nth

ly, C

SBG

-IS

is

revi

ewed

an

nu

ally

.

Ad

voca

cy

serv

ices

will

be

pro

vid

ed

to h

elp

ind

ivid

ual

s,

incl

ud

ing

sen

ior

citi

zen

s,

app

ly t

o

ph

arm

aceu

tic

al p

atie

nt

assi

stan

ce

pro

gram

s fo

r

assi

stan

ce

wit

h lo

w o

r

no

co

st

med

icat

ion

s.

Ind

ivid

ual

s,

incl

ud

ing

sen

ior

citi

zen

s, h

ave

affo

rdab

le

acce

ss t

o

pre

scri

pti

on

med

icat

ion

to

mai

nta

in t

hei

r

hea

lth

.

40

0 o

ut

of

41

0

ind

ivid

ual

s

or

98

%

req

ues

tin

g

assi

stan

ce

du

rin

g FY

'17

will

rec

eive

thei

r

req

ues

ted

pre

scri

pti

on

med

icat

ion

at lo

w o

r n

o

cost

.

46

9

ind

ivid

ual

s

rece

ived

pre

scri

pti

on

med

icat

ion

assi

stan

ce

du

rin

g

FY'1

7.

Rx

for

Okl

aho

ma

inta

kes

and

logs

, CA

PTA

IN,

CSB

G-I

S

Family

Community

Agency

Documents

KI BOIS Community Action Foundation, Inc. and Forms/2016 KCAF Board Outcomes... · KI BOIS Community Action Foundation, Inc. Accomplishments, Coordination of Funds and Outcomes of