Khushwant2 Opt

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/26/2019 Khushwant2 Opt

    1/2

    O F T H E F O R T N I G H T

    SINGH

    IHaven'tCompromised

    AT 68,

    Khushwant Singh, ebullient,

    ea-

    and a man with an impish sense

    of

    fun,

    acknowledged to be a household name.

    January, Singh,

    who has

    readers

    with

    his

    acid

    an d

    barbed

    in

    T he H industan T imes ,

    is

    downas editor after less than three

    in the seat. Th e bespectacled an d sli-

    stoo ping gentleman sardarji ha s

    th e

    subject

    o f

    much acid debate,

    bu t

    that a f f e c t

    his

    image. Frank

    d

    forthright,

    Singh has changed

    jobs

    ami-

    t raging controversy. He was ousted from

    he I l lustrated W eekly of India in 1977 by

    e Janata regime, primarily because of his

    an d

    unabashed show

    o f

    loyalty

    to

    rs Gandhi and the late Sanjay Gandhi,

    himself

    the

    epithet

    o f

    Khushamad

    from an indignant reader.

    Th e

    high point

    o f

    Singh's career

    in

    alism, which started

    in

    1969,

    was his

    o f

    T he

    Illustrated W eekly; H e

    his indelible mark on the magazine by

    into its somewhat dullformat, pic-

    o f nudes and his iconoclastic views.

    e circulation

    o f

    the magazine shot

    up

    and, with

    it, his

    market value.

    ll along his

    varied career

    as lawyer,

    diplomat, author

    of the

    T ra in

    T o

    Pakistan and H is to ry

    Sikhs,

    an d

    editor

    o f

    such diverse

    magazine, N a t io na l H era ld , N ew

    magazine

    and of

    course T he

    Singh has been many a

    charged

    with inconsistency in his

    to have no re-

    hi s analogy o f Maneka Gandhi as

    astride a

    tiger ,

    however made a

    relations with Mrs Gandhi. But

    able

    to

    establish

    himself in her

    favour

    and was rewarded

    with

    a

    seat

    in the

    Sabha.

    Sympathetic

    to the

    cause

    o f

    women's

    is

    unable

    to

    comprehend

    e

    readers' objection

    to his

    playfully

    references

    to

    women

    in his

    columns.

    leaving The H industan Times Singh

    s every intention o f remaining in the li-

    will continue his widely read

    'With Malice Towards One And

    T he

    Hindustan Times

    apart from

    for the Ananda Bazar group of pub-

    He also ha s another project o n

    a novel, with Delhi as its backdrop,

    ha s

    been

    lying

    incomplete

    on his

    desk

    last

    12

    years. IN D I T O D Y

    C O O M I K P O O R met and in-

    Singh

    in his

    -first

    floor

    Hindustan

    Times Building o f f i c e in New Delhi.

    Extracts from the interview:

    Q.

    /

    understand

    th

    Birlas

    have asked

    you to

    relinquish

    charge even before your

    contract expires

    in May.

    A. I have not been asked to leave

    early. I am taking the leave accumulated

    dur ing my

    nearly three years in The

    Hindustan Times. Let me add that the re-

    lationship between the Birlas and me is

    most cordial.

    My

    suspicion

    is

    that

    it

    was Sanjay Gandhiwho

    got m e the job in The

    Hindustan

    Times.

    1

    1

    Q. W as there political pressure on the

    Birlas not to renew your contract?

    A .That is m y

    conjecture.

    At the

    same

    time I have been quite obviously black-

    listed

    from radio

    a n d T V ,

    since around

    the time of the last Cabinet reshuffle. Even

    advertised programmes and

    totally non-

    political programmes like the

    World

    Of

    Nature

    series, which I have been told

    had the

    largest viewing, were cancelled

    suddenly

    and without any explanation.

    Y ou

    know nothing remains secret

    in

    India .

    M y own

    f r iends

    i n A IR an d

    Doordarshan told

    m e

    th a t instructions

    had

    come

    not to

    give

    me so

    much exposure.

    Or

    none

    at

    all.

    Q.

    Where

    have these

    instructions com e

    from

    ?

    A . T h a t I wo uldn t kno w. But quite

    obviously they came from somebody close

    to her

    ( Indira Gandhi)

    or to the

    set-up

    They found m y views unpalatable for re-

    asons best known to themselves and they

    took the step. Even a programme liketh

    Akal i

    summit where without

    a

    do ubt

    I

    would

    be one of the p ersons norm ally cal-

    led,

    I was

    not. Small-minded people have

    done it. But I can't pin-point the indi-

    viduals. It would be unfair.

    Q. Can you pin-point which of your

    views wa s unpalatable ?

    Som e feel your fal

    from grace

    is

    because

    of the

    conservative

    Birla s disapproval of your constant use o

    titillating references.

    A. Absolute rubbish. Birla has never

    been annoyed with me. One of the con-

    tradictions of

    th is

    is that he is

    asking

    me

    to continue writing my column, which

    they adm it is the most widely read colum n

    and reproduced in

    about

    a dozen other

    newspapers.

    Q.

    Then was it your selection of

    Maneka as

    Sanjay s

    successor which wa s

    unpalatable ?

    A.I have been totally misquoted. Th

    column you are referring to was written

    immediately after Sanjay s death. I made a

    conjecture and the interpretation has been

    wrongly put . I did not say she was

    Sanjay s

    successor. I said she may

    carr

    on

    Sanjay s man tle.

    A t that

    t ime Rajiv

    had clearly

    shown

    that he had no

    incli-

    nation

    for

    politics. Maneka

    was not

    taken

    seriously.

    I only said she's not as namby-

    pamby as most people imagine. There wa

    a lot to her and

    when driven

    to it she ca

    be like Durga on a tiger. But

    that

    this

    should be interpreted that I was support

    ing

    Maneka

    against Rajivor Rajiv agains

    Maneka is an absolute fallacy. It is a tra-

    gic state of

    affairs

    when, in a co untry of

    700

    million, people

    are

    being asked

    to

    choose between Maneka and Rajiv. Th

    impression

    ha s

    been created

    that

    this

    is all

    we

    have

    to

    choose from.

    Q.

    Then was the im pression that yo u

    were

    soft

    on

    Maneka

    a major

    reason

    fo r

    your rem oval?

    I N D I A

    T O D A Y ,

    J N U R Y } [ lySj

  • 7/26/2019 Khushwant2 Opt

    2/2

    A .Don't put words in to my mouth . I

    no

    doubt that there

    was a

    certain

    of

    unhappiness amongs t

    the po-

    that be. And

    suspect that this

    is

    the}

    believe

    to be my

    s tand,

    which is

    should

    be

    such

    smal l -minded people .

    Q. With hindsight do you regret yo u

    thatpiece'

    A . I

    don t regret writ ing

    it. But it

    cost

    Q .

    Can an editor of a

    major

    national

    in

    this

    country

    survive without

    ?

    A. I

    have n t compromised

    and I

    t survived.

    And it is my

    distinction

    I

    have

    fallen

    foul

    of

    successive

    in fo rmat ion

    and

    broadcast ing,

    the m isfortu ne to run the sta te-

    had to blacklist

    editor of an Indian nat ional dai ly

    of his

    boss

    and the

    boss

    has the

    One has to make except ions . For

    in the

    Anan da Bazar g roup the re

    a m uch closer relat i onsh ip between the

    and the

    proprietor. Those

    who own

    don't

    have that part i -

    Q. H ow would yo u describe your re-

    with the various newspaper ow -

    yo u have worked with?

    A . The re la t ions between th e Bir las

    with th e Sa rkars of the A n a n d a

    very cordial.

    J a in s of the

    Bennett ,

    Co leman

    the relat ionsh ip became foul only

    the last stage. I have not the slightest

    hat

    the

    Jains were pressurised

    y

    Desai or his son to dispe nse wit h

    y

    services

    and I got it as

    much

    in

    words

    The

    Ja ins paid

    th e

    price

    r

    bowing

    to

    pol i t ical pressure.

    The

    is

    back

    to

    where

    it was

    T

    took over.

    And I

    don t

    th ink the

    are as

    much

    to

    b lame

    as the

    pro-

    If you go on being mealy mou-

    in every thing you do that is the re-

    Y ou

    have

    to

    t ake

    a

    very distinct line

    really have to h ave a passion. 1

    t h ink

    m y

    successors

    had any

    Q.

    H ow would yo u rate your innings in

    he Hindustan

    Times?

    You

    haven't l f t

    individual s tamp on the newspaper th e

    yyou

    di d

    i nTh e

    Illustrated

    Wee kly.

    A . N o

    ed i tor

    ca n

    leave

    h is

    s tamp

    on a

    n a m e m y d is t inguished prede-

    left no stamp on the paper. In

    I left more stamp because I added

    items.

    Q. To

    what extent

    was

    your appoint-

    as

    editor

    of T he Hindustan Times due

    to

    your journalist ic credentials

    and to

    w h a t

    degree was it to

    your impeccable polit ical

    connections?

    A. A combinat ion of both . At tempts

    were made

    at one

    t ime, which were

    en-

    tirely

    political to

    foist

    me on the

    Indian

    Express It wasn t as if I had not made a

    certain amount of name fo r myself.. .my

    suspicion is that i t was Sanjay Gandhi

    who got me the job in

    The

    Hindustan

    Times

    Q .

    Som e feel that your 'Malice

    Towards One And Al l '

    column should

    at

    least

    spare the

    dead. Your remarks

    on

    Baburao Patel, Rajni Patel an d

    Lala

    Shri

    R am

    were

    thought to be in bad taste.

    A. I have no respect for the dead just

    Aneditorof an

    Indian national daily

    can survive for long

    only

    if he

    has

    th e

    supportof his

    boss

    and

    the

    boss

    has

    th e nerve.

    because they are dead. I don't see how

    just because a person has died he has ac-

    quired some kind of sanctity. If a fellow is

    a dubious type then th e best time to take

    him on is

    a f ter

    he is

    dead.

    He

    can't take

    you to court.

    I t s completely untru e that

    the Shri Ram family was

    offended

    with

    m y

    observat ions .Charat

    R am

    roared with

    laugh te r when he met me and

    said: 'I'm

    glad to

    know

    the old man had a

    glad

    eye'.

    They don't know

    how

    to carry pornography.

    I did it with finesse.

    And

    never a complaint

    from th e court or the

    Press

    Council.

    Q . Aren't you somewhat

    iindiscriminat-

    in g in the way you accept free trips from all

    an d sundry?

    A. I agree. If I get a

    free

    ticket to go

    abroad I take it . I believe I never travelled

    at the expense of either the Ja ins or the

    Sarkars and only once at the expense of

    the Birlas.

    Q . Presumably

    yo u

    consider yourself

    a

    male chauvinist consideringyo u never

    me n -

    tion

    a

    w om a n

    in

    your column without

    de-

    scribing

    h er

    physical attributes

    ?

    A. W hy does that make m e a chau-

    vinis t? I am

    very

    pr o

    women s l ib .

    If I

    find a

    woman at t ract ive

    I say so. I don't

    make passes at them. I don't see men as

    se x objects certainly.

    Q. What was

    your m ost rewarding

    ex -

    perience

    in

    journalism

    ?

    A. My stay in The

    Illustrated

    Weekly

    The

    Weekly became

    a

    household word

    dur ing my t enure .

    Q.

    But

    T he

    Illustrated Weekly flour-

    ished at a time

    when there

    was no

    rea

    competi t ion.

    Today's magazines are far

    more professional

    an d

    competit ive. Could

    you repeat your success ?

    A. I could

    beat

    the hell out of them.

    They haven t

    a

    clue.

    Q. A clue to what?

    A.

    They don't know

    how to carry

    pornography.

    I did it

    with

    f inesse. And

    never a complaint from th e

    .court

    or the

    Press Counci l .

    I

    didn't

    go

    fo r

    hammy

    th ings .

    M y

    captions carried

    more

    infor-

    mation than their

    pictures.

    Q.

    Was the

    controversial Hindustan

    Times Sunday Weekly

    on

    Pakistan last

    November wi thdrawn

    fo r

    circulation after

    you had clearedit ?

    A. I did not

    clear

    it as I was

    away

    in

    Paris. But I did find it objectionable. The

    introductory caption

    was

    unfortunate .

    It

    said that while the ling uistic and religious

    minori t ies are always airing their grie-

    vances here, in Pakista n the m inor ities are

    happy. T he comparison w as odious.

    Q. What is the

    role

    of the newspaper

    in India?

    A.

    The

    role

    of the

    newspapers

    in this

    country

    is

    very limited.

    It is

    s trictly

    a

    met-

    ropoli tan phenomenon

    and

    even there

    it

    has a

    very restricted impact. Except

    that

    th e ruling class comes from th e newspaper

    reading section and therefore gives it

    much greater importance than it deserves.

    Q.

    Do you think

    that newspapers

    in

    India "should play th e role of the

    Opposition ?

    A. I

    th ink

    it

    should play

    th e

    role

    of

    the

    Opposition.

    The Government controls

    the news agencies,

    th e

    entire mass media

    and all

    that .

    And if the

    press doesn t pre-

    sent

    th e

    Opposi t ion point

    of

    view, which

    it

    doesn t ,

    w i th th e

    exception

    of the

    Indian

    Express

    and

    someothers,

    who

    will?

    Q. H ow susceptible are

    Indian

    jour-

    nalists topressures?

    A. Enormously susceptible. It is my

    personal experience and of my own col-

    leagues that bribery

    and

    corruption

    are

    there. One gets to know about it only

    when the

    report

    is s lanted .

    There

    isdamn

    al l

    you can do about it .

    T O D A Y , J A N U A R Y 3 1 , 1983

    85