Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Key Policy Issues for Local Government:
Welfare Reform, Housing, Planning and
Devolution
WEDNESDAY 23 SEPTEMBER 2015
Wifi
Account details -
Password -
Welcome
Mayor Kate Allsop, Mansfield District Council
Welfare reform
The reforms to date and the impact on
councils and communities
Rose Doran
Overview of reforms to date• There have been two main planks to the welfare
reforms to date:
– The introduction of Universal Credit for working age
claimants
– A range of changes to discrete working-age benefits, the
majority of which have entailed a reduction in spending
and more stringent eligibility and conditionality criteria
Current context
• The reforms to date have saved some money (but not as
much as planned)
• There is some evidence of behaviour change
• The newly elected Conservative government has a manifesto
commitment to deliver a further £12bn of welfare savings
• Universal Credit was a much more complex and demanding
undertaking than expected, but they are now making
progress
• The role of councils and local partners in supporting low
income households is at the heart of impact and
implementation
The introduction of Universal Credit
for working age claimants
Universal Credit• UC replaces the following benefits/tax credits:
• Working Tax Credit,
• Child Tax Credit,
• Housing Benefit,
• Income Support,
• Income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance
• Income-related Employment and Support Allowance.
• Working age
• Monthly payment to household
• Online claims and interface
• Processed by DWP through UC Service Centres
Universal Credit roll out• Live Service – began with new claims for single jobseekers in Tameside
(Ashton-under-Lyne) in April 2013
• Digital Service – Sutton; Croydon - <500 claimants
• All of North West from June 2014
• Couples in existing Live Service areas from Summer 2014
• Singles rolling out to remaining councils between February 2015 and February
2016
• Digital and Live service rolling out alongside one another from 2016; migration
of existing claims from 2018
UC and local government
• We won’t administer HB anymore (eventually!)…
• …funding and staffing while we do
• Supporting individuals and households with transition
and claiming (Universal Support delivered locally)
• Supporting DWP throughout transition and migration
• Our role in achieving and sustaining the over-
arching policy objectives…?
A range of discrete changes to
working age benefits
Overview of the reforms so far…• Started in earnest in April 2013
• Aimed to:
– simplify mainstream housing and employment benefits
– improve work incentives
– encourage personal responsibility
– target support at those who need it most
– significantly reduce the overall benefits bill
• Income of households claiming benefit estimated to be on
average lower by £1,615 a year – or £31 a week – in 2015/16
as a result of welfare reforms (Source: LGA/CESI 2013)
Summary of key Coalition reforms• Changes to Housing Benefit (HB) for renters in the private sector – reduction of the
Local Housing Allowance (LHA) from the 50th to the 30th percentile of local rents
• The removal of the “spare room subsidy” for most HB recipients in social housing
• The introduction of a cap on total benefit receipt
• Changes to tax credits
• Tightening of eligibility and the restriction of contributory Employment and Support
Allowance (ESA) to one year
• The replacement of Disability Living Allowance (DLA) with Personal Independence
Payment (PIP)
• The uprating of benefits and tax credits by 1% instead of the CPI
• The replacement of Council Tax Benefit with locally-determined Council Tax Support
schemes
• The replacement of the Social Fund with Local Welfare Support
• The introduction of Universal Credit
Review of savings from reforms to date
• The coalition government did not manage to realise all of its planned savings,
however, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) it implemented
changes that mean that spending in 2015/16 is £16.7bn lower than it would
otherwise have been.
• The Government is, however, arguably running to stand still: overall welfare
spending this year is the same as in 2010.
• The coalition also had to revise down some of its planned savings due to
incorrect assumptions and problems with implementation.
Projected vs actual savings (1)
Source: Gaffney 2015
Budget 2015
• £12bn further benefit cuts:
– £4bn from rate freeze – including LHA
– £6bn from changes to tax credits
– £1.4bn take-away from councils and RSLs – 1%
pa freeze on social rents (saving on HB)
Budget 2015
• ‘Restoring fairness’
– Benefit cap reduced from £26k to £23k in London
and £20k outside London
– Removal of HB entitlement for some out-of-work
18-21 year olds
– Shift from tax credits to ‘National Living Wage’
So what…?
LGA position
You can’t reduce the welfare bill solely by
cutting benefits you need to address:
• Housing costs (supply)
• Unemployment, underemployment and low
wages
• Resilience, life chances and the safety net
Housing
Housing Benefit
“In the case of housing benefit, underlying
macroeconomic and demographic pressures more than
cancelled out reductions in the generosity of support.
The OBR identify three such pressures in their Welfare
trends report: the growth of the private rented sector,
real growth in private rents and falls in real earnings.”
Source: IFS 2014
Housebuilding
Source: National Housing Federation 2015
Increase in HB claimants in work
Employment and skillsLocal areas need powers, funding and responsibilities to plan employment and
skills investment in their local area. In return, councils can reduce long-term
unemployment and better serve local employers’ current and future skills
demands.
A shared commitment 21 The Government can achieve this through the
introduction of Local Labour Market Agreements across England by 2016/17.
They should include devolution or co-commissioning of almost £3 billion
employment and skills funding, including the £100 million Flexible Support Fund,
the £2 billion adult skills budget and a dual scheme replacement for the £620
million Work Programme.
A shared commitment – local government and the spending review
LGA August 2015
Revised estimates of ESA savings
Integrated support for low income
households
ESA claimants
Sanctions
“Each month around 5% of JSA recipients are sanctioned.
After reconsideration and/or appeal, 29% of those who
receive their first ‘lower’ tier sanction have it overturned,
meaning around 5,600 of them a month are wrongly
sanctioned … meaning an estimated 68,000 people a year
wrongfully experience a sanction in this category. Given that
some estimates suggest that 43% of those referred to food
banks are there due to benefit stoppage or being refused a
crisis loan, this is a clear area of policy concern.”
Policy Exchange, 2014
Local safety net
• Universal Support delivered locally
• Local Council Tax support schemes
• Discretionary Housing Payment (DHP) -
£800m over the next five years
• Local welfare schemes - £74m 2015/16
• Troubled Families
• Child Poverty – life chances; income measure
Discretionary Housing Payment
The local safety net?• Local welfare safety net inquiry
• (Our long term role in benefit administration)
• USdl; local welfare schemes; DHP
• Making Jobcentres fit for purpose
• Co-location (e.g. Melton; Bassetlaw) – better integration of
employment, housing, money and other support
• Learning from Troubled Families
• Childcare
• Support for families and parenting
Questions and Answers
Child Poverty in the East Midlands
Rachel Clark, Nottinghamshire County Council
Child Poverty – current picture
and future developments
National picture
• Latest Household Below Average Income dataset indicates that national Child Poverty rates have remained broadly unchanged at 2.3 million
• There is a national Child Poverty Strategy in place running from 2014-17
• Based on the Children Living in Low Income Families dataset, there are 18.6% of children in England living in poverty . Challenging to accurately measure levels of child poverty as datasets are more than two years out of date.
• An obligation on employers to pay a Living Wage is a welcome development, however, this is needs to be balanced against proposed cuts in tax credits
• Research by Joseph Rowntree Foundation indicates that families with children are falling below minimum income standards
Minimum Income Standards
The Local Picture - data
• East Midlands – 17.6%
• Leicestershire 10.9%
• Nottinghamshire -16.0%
• Lincolnshire- 15.7%
• Derbyshire -15.6%
• Northamptonshire 15.1%
NB: Even some of the most
affluent wards contain pockets
of 30%+ children living in
poverty
• Nottingham 32.6%
• Leicester- 26.4%
• Rutland – 7.3%
• Derby -22.8%
• Lincoln- 22.4%
Proposed changes to Child Poverty Act
• Remove the duties on local authorities to produce local
needs assessments and strategies
• Remove the duties on government to meet the four
national child poverty targets
• Remove the duties on government to publish a three-
yearly child poverty strategy
• Replace income related targets with targets around
worklessness, educational achievement, drug and
alcohol dependency, family breakdown and debt
• Publication of Life Chances Strategy
Figure 1: Increased likelihood of child being in
low income according to several family
characteristics
Source: Analysis of drivers
of Child Poverty Now:DWP
June 2014
What is being done locally to tackle child
poverty?
• Regional child poverty officer group has been re-
established
• Each authority currently has a child poverty strategy.
This is usually overseen by a multi –agency group. Staff
with a detailed knowledge of the benefits system are key
members of these groups.
• A number of authorities are in the process of updating
their Child Poverty Needs Assessments – these will give
us a clearer picture of levels of poverty, the story behind
the data and what actions we need to take.
What’s being done locally
• Pupil Premium and Early Years Pupil Premium
• Early Education Entitlement
• Roll out of Troubled Families Programme – extension of
funding for a further five years
What’s happening in different authorities?
• In Nottinghamshire, we have rolled out Child Poverty Awareness
workshops for frontline staff, gives staff a clear understanding of
what they can do in their day to day work to mitigate the effects of
poverty
• Funding for Countywide information tackling financial exclusion
• Lincoln City – Lincoln against Poverty campaign
• Nottingham City – re-shaping information and advice provision
• Derbyshire – support for food provision across the County
• North East – poverty proofing schools
What works best ?
• Practical support for local people
• Children, young people and parents voices
• Political support and leadership
• All partners working together
• Good understanding of local needs
Focus for the future
• Need particular focus on care leavers and families with
disabled children
• Developing more joined up and consistent parenting
support – key to addressing the root causes of poverty
• Influencing perceptions of poverty
Contact details
• Rachel Clark
• Child Poverty and Parenting Manager
• 07788412312
Questions and Answers
Break
Housing Policy
East Midlands Councils
23 September 2015
*
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
Malcolm Sharp
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
The Lyons
Housing Review
Mobilising across the
nation to build the homes
our children need
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
THE REMIT
• Sponsored by Labour
• Independent
• Chair: Sir Michael Lyons
• Road map to secure 200,000 homes per year
by the end of the next parliament
Personal reflection not speaking for the Commission
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
THE CASE
• Good homes underpin all our collective ambitions –
stable communities, educational attainment;
“quality of life”
• A major contribution to a stronger national economy,
an important domestic industry, greater labour
mobility, building on opportunity
• Critical to the control of inflation
• Current system one cause of increasing inequaliity
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
• A housing crisis of our own making
• National focus on delivery
• Land supply
• Ensuring land is built out
• Communities driving their own development
• A new generation of Garden Cities and Garden
Suburbs
• The house building industry
• Quality, Design and Sustainability
• Housing for all
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
Two background Issues:
Enough land (in the right place)
(but its not all planning fault)
Capacity to build
(both more ‘developers’ and
‘construction capability skills etc)
But more complex than this.
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
4000001
91
9/2
0
19
22
/23
19
25
/26
19
28
/29
19
31
/32
19
34
/35
19
37
/38
1940/4
1
19
43
/44
1947
1950
1953
1956
1959
1962
1965
1968
1971
1974
1977
1980
1983
1986
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
2004
2007
2010
2013
Ho
usin
g c
om
ple
tio
ns
Local Authorities
HousingAssociations
CLG Figures
Real target to keep pace with need 240,000 +
Year to June 15
131,000
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
Some key Recommendations (39 in total)
1. Housing Priority for next Govt.
2. Consolidate and devolve funding
3. Local Plans requirement & needs asses.
4. Strategic Housing Market Plans – right to grow
5. National spatial priorities
6. Use it or loose it pp
7. Housing Growth Areas
8. New Home Development Corporations and
growth areas
9. New generation of garden cities/suburbs
10.Support for SMEs
11.Increase quality market rent product
12.Support LA investment
13. Quality / space stnds. / Bldg. for life
SHARP PLANNING PLUSLatest figures:
Housing completions year to June 15 – 131,060
Housing starts 136,320 – down 1%
Expert prediction in year 2020 range 138K – 180K
Need at least 240-245K pa* – (1.2M+ over parliament)
East Mids share 20.5K pa* (16.4K market 4.1K social)
Shortfall 2010/11 – 12/13 circa 400K
*Cambridge Centre for Housing & Planning Research 2013
SHARP PLANNING PLUSGovernment Policy
“Having your own place is an important stake in our
economy. It’s also one of the best expressions of the
aspirational country we want to build, where hard
work is rewarded.”
PM & C of Exch July 4th
SHARP PLANNING PLUSGovernment Policy
“The Government believes that wherever possible
planning decisions should be made by local people.
We will cut back on red tape and endless planning
documents to focus on what people care about – local
roads, schools and homes that meet local needs.”
“We will take action on councils that have failed to
produce a plan for the homes their community
needs”.
PM & C of Exch July 4th
SHARP PLANNING PLUSGovernment Policy
“Last year Councils across England granted planning
permission for 261,00 homes… It is all too easy to
blame the planning system and planners for the
challenges facing the housing market in particular, All
too easy and it would appear, wholly wrong.”
Brandon Lewis Housing and Planning Minister 9th Sept
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
New Government Policy
1. Help to buy
2. Starter Homes initiative
3. Right to buy
4. Help for small builders
5. Pubic sector land release
6. Brownfield Funding
7. Planning reform
PM & C of Exch 4th July
SHARP PLANNING PLUSBrownfield
There is “enough brownfield land for 400,000 homes”
PM & C of Exch 4th July.
• A zonal system – effectively granting planning
permission.
• £10M fund for local authorities to bring forward
brownfield sites to build starter homes for young
1st time buyers at 20% discount
• £26M to identify and purchase brownfield sites in
2015/16 not previously identified for housing.
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
Starter Homes
• 200,000 starter homes by 2020.
• £26M (see above) fund for housebuilders to
demonstrate a range of homes available for 1st
time buyers.
• Require local authorities to plan proactively for
the delivery of starter homes.
• Requiring a proportion of starter homes on all
reasonably sized housing sites.
• Starter homes to be exempt from levies for
example CIL.
• Monitoring how effective local authorities are in
delivering starter homes.
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
Planning
• 2017 deadline for producing a Local Plan.
“the Govt. will arrange for local plans to be
written where necessary”
• Continuation of permitted development changes?
E.G; office to residential
• Streamline the length and process of Local Plans
(panel set up last week).
• Tightening the planning performance regime.
(standards authorities – major applications)
• Fast track large mixed used schemes to be eligible
to go through NSIPS regime (LAs only consultees).
• Zero carbon targets scrapped.
• Upward extns. p.d. in London
SHARP PLANNING PLUSDevolution
• Planning powers to ‘city’ mayors
• power to designate Devel. Corps.
• revised CPO powers.
Gr Manchester, Leeds, Liverpool, Sheffield,
First non metro –Cornwall
Nottingham / Derby / Notts / Derbys?
Leicestershire / Leicester?
SHARP PLANNING PLUSHelp to Buy
• Equity loans
• Affordable Housing Guarantee scheme
• Help to buy ISAs
• £1 Bn. Build to rend Fund – 10,000 houses
Right to buy
• Extended to RSL tenants – up to 70% discount
SHARP PLANNING PLUSOther
• Housing Growth Partnership - £100M for small
builders – down by over 1/3 since mid 80s (50
investments – 2000 homes)
• Release of public sector land – 150,000 homes over
5 years
• Locally led Garden Cities / Towns - Ebbsfleet
• Crack down on rogue landlords and agents
• Benefit changes – benefit cap and reduction in
social rents
SHARP PLANNING PLUSReflections
• Housing high profile in policy announcements - the
devil will be in the detail
• Concentrates on demand side & home ownership –
welcomed by housebuilders – should increase house
building (recent starts down 1%)
• Benefit / rent changes likely to lead to RSLs
abandoning plans for 14,000 homes (Office for
Budget Responsibility) NHF says 22,000
• Subsidy to those buying increased rental subsidies
to people on benefits reduced (Financial Times July
11th)
SHARP PLANNING PLUSReflections
• Brownfield 400,000 - need for 1M+ over parliament
therefore greenfield inevitable.
• Brownfield sites are often disconnected from vital
social infrastructure such as schools, hospitals and
good transport links. Impact on neighbours? SEA?
• Who will provide infrastructure where levies waived
• Planning obstacles not as important as viability
issues.
• Use it or loose it policy not in favour
• Hope value for employment sites - where will jobs
go?
SHARP PLANNING PLUSReflections
• How to promote more Council House building?
• RSL building could fall – 2013 accounted for 24% of
all completions
• Adding up all the initiatives less than 245K new
homes p.a. needed - so backlog likely to increase.
• Many people will remain reliant on private rented
sector – need more protection?
• Spend on Housing Benefit - £24 Bn. (1/4 of UK total
deficit)
AFFORDABILITY
• Average home x8 average wage
• Av 1993 - £50K 2007- £184K 2009 - £150K 2015 - £188K
• House prices rising again – 5% pa?
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
Conclusion
• Work in progress some way to go yet.
“ important challenges on how the significant
volume of houses needed to address the housing
crisis remain” CEO Barton Wilmore
• Quality of what is built and infrastructure provision
also key challenges
Questions and Answers
EMC Housing Review
Cllr Chris Millar
EMC Executive Board Member
Introduction
Background
Objectives
Key Issues
Some questions
Next Steps
Background: Delivery
Background: Affordability
Housing Review Objectives
Highlight existing good practice by
councils in the EM and suggest how this
could be more widely deployed
Highlight to Government policy changes
which could help councils unlock local
housing delivery
Key Issues
Planning across
housing markets
Rural Housing
Delivery
Urban
Regeneration
Affordable Housing
Delivery
Impact of Welfare
Reform
Infrastructure
Delivery
Construction Skills
& Materials
Some Questions
What will be the impact of extending ‘right
to buy’ to Housing Association tenants?
Will the provision of discounted ‘starter
homes’ help to meet local housing need?
Is infrastructure still a barrier to housing
delivery?
How important is the provision of
traditional ‘social housing’ to your
communities?
Next Steps
Further information and examples of good
practice welcome
We are keen to produce something that is
rooted the our own experience but with
wider relevance – and national policy is
changing fast
Aim to publish at next EMC General
meeting (Feb 2016)
Questions and Answers
Lunch
Planning Policy
Current Trends & Future
Prospects
ANDREW PRITCHARD
DIRECTOR OF POLICY & INFRASTRUCTURE
Introduction
Review of recent history
2015: Fixing the Foundations
Likely main changes
Key messages for councils
Planning & Housing March 2010
Regional Plans
Local Development Frameworks
Regional allocations for housing, transport &
economic development spending
Fiscal stimulus boost to Affordable Housing
Programme
May 2010: Proposals for
Change
Localism & deregulation
System based on
neighbourhood plans
Removal of Government
targets for housing & planning
Fiscal incentives to encourage
house-building
Presumption in favour of
sustainable development
Coalition Policy in Practice
Abolition of regional planning (eventually)
Introduction of Neighbourhood Plans – but Local Plans take
precedence
A new ‘duty to co-operate’
Simplified statements of Government Planning Policy (NPPF) &
guidance
Deregulation of ‘change of use’ and permitted development rights
Re-introduction of council planning performance targets
2015 General Election
Major political parties
agreed on the need
for more housing &
growth
But they differed
fundamentally on the
means by which this
should be achieved
May 2015: Conservative
Government
“An excessively strict
planning system can prevent
land and other resources
from being used effectively,
impeding productivity…”
(para 9.4)
The planning system creates
a ‘…slow, expensive and
uncertain process’…(para
9.14)
Likely key changes…(1)
Streamline local plan process
Allow NISP regime to deal with housing-related
development
Take wind energy over 50 MW out of NISP regime
Introduce ‘zonal style’ planning for brownfield
development
Assumed outline permission for local plan allocations?
Likely key changes…(2)
End commitment to Zero Carbon Homes
Statutory register for brownfield land
Devolution of planning powers to CA mayors -
and potentially powers to designate
development corporations
‘starter homes’ to be classed as ‘affordable
housing’?
Key Messages for Councils
Get your plan in place!
Delivery is King!
Neighbourhood planning is here to stay!
Make co-operation work!
And finally….
Get your plan in place!
The Achilles Heal of the current system
is the lack of plan coverage
Without either Structure Plan or
Regional Plan - the local plan is the
only show in town
Councils must get plans in place to
retain a credible system
Ministers want a published plan by
2017 - or else!
Delivery is king!
Government is acutely aware
that development remains low –
and new starts actually falling
Credible 5 Year Housing land
supply is essential
Councils must act proactively to
get development away
Neighbourhood planning
is here to stay!
Neighbourhood planning is
a perceived success
Both Government &
opposition have voiced
support
Councils must work with
communities to support
neighbourhood planning
Make co-operation work!
There are no proposals to re-instate statutory strategic planning
Council’s must make co-operation work
More Joint planning arrangements – linked to emerging devolution deals?
And finally…
Treasury/LSE believe planning increases development
costs and is SO last century..
Current moves towards de-regulation could be a
prelude to move fundamental changes...
Do NOT take the current
planning system for granted!
Questions and Answers
Devolution & Combined Authorities
in the East Midlands
WEDNESDAY 23RD SEPTEMBER 2015
A focus for this Parliament
Treasury deadline 4th
September.
Spending Review 25th
November.
Cities and Devolution Bill
making its way through Parliament.
A focus for this Parliament
Devolution is happening
now.
Different models.
Historic opportunity?
What is Devolution?
Key to unlocking growth and improving
public services.
A genuinely different approach.
Fiscal Devolution
The 95% and 5% split;
central to local.
Over 60 central
government funding pots.
Policy Devolution
Lack of flexibility of
nationally developed
policy.
Benefits and skills system not working.
Bureaucratic, inefficient and unaffordable.
What Devolution isn’t!
Not about more taxes.
Not about new layers of Government.
Not loss of power to CAs.
Not loss of identity
Not about one governance model.
It’s Happening
38 submissions.
Most of East Midlands
covered.
Includes responsibility for
skills, transport, finance,
business support, EU monies,
health and social care,
housing and prisons!
So, What’s Next?
Government to respond
through Spending
Review announcement.
Process not clear.
And the Government
reserves the right to say
‘no’.
Summary of Proposals
D2N2
Leicester and Leicestershire
Greater Lincolnshire
Northamptonshire
Governance
Clear Government
expectation.
Arrangements will need to be
confirmed.
Scrutiny and public
involvement ‘gap’ (CFPS).
Summary – Opportunities
Releasing un-tapped growth
potential.
Rebalance economy.
Reforming public services –
better outcomes, lower cost.
Renewing our democracy.
Questions and Answers
Conference Close