Keshe Technologies. © Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending The Keshe Foundation Created by Nuclear Engineer M.T. Keshe Holder of

Keshe Technologies

© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending

The Keshe Foundation

Created by Nuclear Engineer M.T. Keshe Holder of Intellectual rights

International Patent Applications, more in progress. Methods related to new nuclear processes Range of Applications of these processes Concepts of static reactors Concepts of dynamic reactors.

Goals: Activate Social and Economic Progress


Mehran Tavakoli KESHE

Born in Tehran, Iran. Aug.2,1958 UK-resident, British-travel docs. Married 1979-1981 Engineer Nuclear reactor design and

technology - Queen Mary (Univ. of London) 1980 British Nuclear Fuel 1981-2004: Private study on nuclear concepts 1982-2002: Private owned international trading 2002-2006: Full private R&D on plasma

reactors. Several prototypes. Invited to Belgium by FLAG


Mission Statement

Apply newly discovered nuclear principles for Human Benefit

Deliver solutions for Global Problems: Global Warming Energy Shortage Water related problems Food Shortage

Develop new Technologies and Materials


New Approach in Physics Today: I.e. Frank Wilzcek (Quarks, Gluons,

Virtual Sea, Vibrations like music tones) Keshe vision:

Interacting Plasmatic Magnetic Energy Plasmatic Magnetic Fields can entangle (fuse) Plasmatic Magnetic Fields can separate (fissile) “Particles” are in fact SEPMAF’s

(Specific Entangled Plasmatic Magnetic Fields) Behavior of SEPMAF’s can be influenced in a soft way

in view of a preferred outcome (I.e. at room-temperature)


VisualizationSpecific Entangled Plasmatic Magnetic Fields






Actual Proof of Technology

Proven Confirmed Carbon separation at atomic level (sp2/sp3,

superconductive properties and atomic insulation layers) (IMEC, SCK)

Production of voltage and current (SCK) Production of Cold Plasma (Hydrogen) (SCK) Generation of EUV (Extreme Ultra Violet) Generation of EM Fields Lifting effects measured

Indications Self-sustaining process (SCK) Magnetic shield effects


Proof of Technology

By static reactors By dynamic reactors


Static reactors

Tests of static reactor (CO2, Voltage, Current) Simple basic container (Cola

bottle) to be sealed Room temperature Per test filled with different

compositions of liquids Low cost of materials Terminals: Cu wires Source: RA source or

generated RA Isotopes Working for 5 years (if in

correct container)


Electrodes in a static reactor


Carbon extraction source


Carbon from Plastic or CO2


Treatment of copper wires


Treatment of copper wires


Measuring properties


Measuring diamond properties


Testing in pure plasma


Dynamic reactors

Tests of dynamic reactors Steel and plastic cores Temperature

independent Per test filled with

different compositions of gasses

Low cost of materials Easy manufacturing Rotative mechanism Source: Low RA source

Working for … years (depending of RA material)


Conversion systems

Actual nuclear reactors are thermo-nuclear, need triggering input, and have waste problems. Mainly this is the “hard” approach.

Keshe plasma reactors are bio-chemical-nuclear, a “soft” approach, applying inside the cavity a number of cosmogenic principles, such as double magnetic fields which can create “gravitational effects” to provide conditions for atomic and molecular separation (fission) and recombination (fusion) of ALL elements of the Periodic Table and their isotopes.

Long term self-sustaining processes are possible


Conversion systems In Keshe bio-chemical nuclear plasma reactors

one or more nuclear sources is used as a longevity triggering source to provoke a chain of desired chemical, biological and bio-chemical reactions to have a preferred output.

Types of output: Energy (heat, current, cooling, ...), Creation of specific atoms and molecules (i.e.

Atomic hydrogen, pure C) Separation of materials (i.e. Polluted H2O), H2O Electro-magnetic fields, Gravitational effects.


Large Power systems


Actual Power systems


New Energy Systems


Keshe Power systems


Keshe Generator


Construction similar to Earth


Fields of Earth


Construction of a reactor


Cooperation for Progress


Application Domains/Markets Consumer electronics White and brown goods Power generation Batteries Automotive Water and Air Treatments Medical Aircarft and Space Exploration Agriculture New Materials Processing systems And much more


Market: Battery-like/Cells


Market: Traditional Batteries


Market: Sales ElectricitySuez: 2001 Sales (mil.): $37,755 , Electrabel S.A.: 2001 Sales (mil.): $11,143 , RWE: 2001 Sales (mil.): $29,498, E.ON: 2001 Sales (mil.): $70,909, Electricité de France : 2001 Sales (mil.): $36,066, Vattenfall: 2001 Sales (mil.): $6,528, Alliant Energy Corporation - 2001 Sales (mil.): $2,777.3, Ameren Corporation : 2001 Sales (mil.): $4,505.9 , Centrais Elétricas Brasileiras S.A. - ELETROBRÁS: 2001 Sales (mil.): $9,251 (30,000MW), Chubu Electric Power Company, Incorporated: 2002 Sales (mil.): $16,804 (31,800MW), Comisión Federal de Electricidad : 2001 Sales (mil.): $11,033 (39,000MW), The Kansai Electric Power Company, Incorporated: 2001 Sales (mil.): $20,961 (37,500MW), The Tokyo Electric Power Company, Incorporated: 2001 Sales (mil.): $41,622 (58,800MW), .... The Israel Electric Corporation Limited 2001 Sales (mil.): $2,381.9. .... and many others.


Market: USA Electricity


Market: USA $ cents/KWh


Market: CO2 Collection


Market: CO2 Emission USA


Market: GHG emission USA


Roadmap CO2 Company


Market: Graphene (sp2)

$9 Billion market in FET Ballistic conductive properties Actually to high priced: 400 Euro/gr KT : Industrial acceptable prices can boost FET’s


Company structure

Kesh Trust Fund SA (NL)

Kesh Technologies NV (B)

Knowledge center

Ver

tical

dom

ain

spec

ific

c

Ver

tical

dom

ain

spec

ific

Ver

tical

dom

ain

spec

ific

Ver

tical

dom

ain

spec

ific

Ver

tical

dom

ain

spec

ific

IP Office

Admin


Asset & revenue structure

Kesh Trust Fund SA (NL)

Kesh Technologies NV (B)

Knowledge center

Ver

tical

dom

ain

spec

ific

c

Ver

tical

dom

ain

spec

ific

Ver

tical

dom

ain

spec

ific

Ver

tical

dom

ain

spec

ific

Ver

tical

dom

ain

spec

ific

IP Office

Admin

IP owner

IP top-down

licensingCost model


Prime Partner

Minority stake in vertical Maximum three/four external partners Revenue share Scope Limited license discount Sneak preview Access knowledge center


Collaborative business

Maximum product development Global equal licensing structure No direct competition Cost share Gain share Platform level


General Remarks

Impact: Sufficiency Model <-> Demand/Offer Model Participation of United Nations is essential Blocking of technology must be excluded Emphasis on Social progress Emphasis on development of Local economies No active participation in military applications Respect for existing industrial infrastructure

1. Offering a time frame for adaptation

2. Offering licensing and cooperation

3. Offering participation in R&D

4. Offering participation in verticals


The Value ? Compare … Remember Fleischmann & Pons(1989) Fleischmann (1996) about Cold Fusion: “I think that

it is a question of economics … I did a first assessment of what the first successful device would be worth and it came out at about 300 trillion dollars.”

“So, at that sort of value, people are prepared to take a rather high risk on the research. I don't think you should over-emphasize the value of cold fusion necessarily, but if you make your list of the ten most valuable projects, high temperature superconductors will always be on the list; fuel cells will always be on the list.”

The difference: KT Replicated by Nuclear Agency

Documents

Keshe Technologies. © Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending The Keshe Foundation Created by Nuclear Engineer M.T. Keshe Holder of