25
KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki, VanCleave PUBLIC SERVICE COMMITTEE Monday, October 20, 2008 9:00 a.m. 1. Approval of Minutes : September 15, 2008 2. Monthly Financial Report (attached) 3. Public Comment RECORDER (Wegman) 4. Monthly Report (attached) COLLECTOR (Rickert) 5. 'Monthly Report SUPERVISOR OF ASSESSMENTS (Armstrong) 6. Monthly Report (attached) COUNTY CLERK (Cunningham) 7. Monthly Report (attached) 8. Resolution: Authorizing Intergovernmental Agreement with the Village of Pingree Grove - Special Service Area No. 18 - Heritage District (Held over at September 15 meeting) 9. Resolution: Authorizing Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Aurora - Special Service Area No. 141 - Country Squire Estates Lighting Improvements (Held over at September 15 meeting) 10. Resolution: Authorizing Intergovernmental Agreement with the Village of Montgomery - Special Service Area No. 17 (held over at September 15 meeting) 11. Resolution: Amending 2008 County Clerk Budget, Fiscal Year 2008 REGIONAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION (Johnson) 12. Monthly Report OTHER BUSINESS COMMITTEE COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT

KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki, VanCleave

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMITTEEMonday, October 20, 2008

9:00 a.m.

1. Approval of Minutes : September 15, 2008

2. Monthly Financial Report (attached)

3. Public Comment

RECORDER (Wegman)4. Monthly Report (attached)

COLLECTOR (Rickert)5. 'Monthly Report

SUPERVISOR OF ASSESSMENTS (Armstrong)6. Monthly Report (attached)

COUNTY CLERK (Cunningham)7. Monthly Report (attached)8. Resolution: Authorizing Intergovernmental Agreement with the Village of Pingree Grove

- Special Service Area No. 18 - Heritage District (Held over at September 15 meeting)9. Resolution: Authorizing Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Aurora - Special

Service Area No. 141 - Country Squire Estates Lighting Improvements (Held over atSeptember 15 meeting)

10. Resolution: Authorizing Intergovernmental Agreement with the Village of Montgomery -Special Service Area No. 17 (held over at September 15 meeting)

11. Resolution: Amending 2008 County Clerk Budget, Fiscal Year 2008

REGIONAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION (Johnson)12. Monthly Report

OTHER BUSINESS

COMMITTEE COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

Page 2: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

cMLL

CAa,

a)

t1

N "Cco N

r rC.f)

U3 (D

U) (Dco O00

O ccO O O

O O 0

C, NCD (D

CCi C (7

© ((0COCD

0 0 0CO M tor r 0N r U)

N N 0)M N

(D N t-r

0 0 0

© 0 0

N

OU)C\iNon0)6f3

00

0

NU,

NN-N6)

4-

0

0

d' Co0 rN adM CDr 0

0 U)CD rn

toN

WU)00OO

0

N

M

U,

I

N

U) '4O N

0)) NN M

0 U)Nr

ci 060 '-

N 0)

0 0

NN C^N r--04 tt)(n U)

r

M N0 r-eo NM O

0 0O 0m U)(D 6))It00 0

I^r)

rn

O ^ IO O OCO co 0h co

U)N

rn(DtoM(n69

NEF}

(D CO (D

CC cli00 I:rM oc0 Nti N

00 Cow

y T

00(a (D

N M

N O

0 00 0O 0

0 to0

c0 C7rnNU) 0N co

0 00 0 00T U)

0 co coCA (p

a) N NN (n NC+) D) )

0 000C;

0 00 0

U,co 00(})

N [1-LO NCA M

U')co

a)U)C)toCD

MIn6f}

0(D

NO)14-'T•

69

`C7C

. i.

Oa(DNa)lq*

OO

c'iIT

to0)

toO?O(DO

C)

0O

O

0CDd'0U1

0M

000

00

0U,0M

coO(()Na)It

69.

tf)0cli-rt()

U)0)(Ilk

U)0)OCD0)

M6R

000

N

ca)

A.AJ

NN

CV(7

ce)

M

(Aco

0)NCdOU)

cl^

N(D

00)rnN

coco

h

NM

N

00CAco0d'N

000

OOa)M0

N

NN

NMvMMFf3

CT)co

ON

U)toO

CC)

69

0

NO(nN0

6t}

N(0

OOCDCV0)

coM

NNM

N

00rncoOITN

00069

0)coCDCO

OctU)

coCoCf)N

C()0Cl)

r^

N

M0MtoMd

(00

O

coM

NIC)

OV'

t)NN

C-)

N

O0

0

00aiNNM

N

N_

M0MCCO-C{}

00O(f}

coco

NU)IT

O

m

N

M

rN.

69'

0

d69

OU1~NM'.N

h

O0)(rCf)CD

CDU)69

0O

N*I:YU)

N69-

N O 0N N 0O cd CO00u,

NIli

N•d

co -q mM -

03

0 0 d

0 h N

ca (DO N

CO0O

In00

MU)

Page 3: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

bc^.1^

L..

+a.m

0

F

j

Z'

0:

D

(000)(ON(.D I- 00 000)LC)I`c)0Qd' 00 O O d''d" I` N (D It

co c aT T (^ N

co Ltd i- T N

(D C'14 CD CY) 006o6 C0 - LC)4ct T- T- CF) NtNt Co Co C) LC)

06 C6 1117 L(] d'60' O N 00 Q

O O O OC) T T Q

o) " C) 00

00 rn ()O)I- LC) I` 'Ct to

©LC)LULOOLnO LC) I- r- C) T

© N C)J c6 I` CY)Q C7 T C) 6) L0Q 00 LO O O (Y)

C6 1-:N © ~

Q LC) 00 LC) Q (0Q LC) 00 I`• O LC)

T d" (i CV Q00 O C3) ti 00 d(D (D Q C) (0

Y- t-'OLC)Q TT. T

Q Q Q O QQ Q 0 0 0000 Co(o 6

cO LO (DLO 'ttON 0) NLC)T LC) d It

N69- T T T T

C\1 Gr^ 4 E

NNNIl-C)((D (0 (© (o NT T T T T T

J

0

Page 4: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

M O co O O w O r- C) O 0 O O Cr) C - N d" W Lt)IL) LO c m O d; O N Ca O O O O O N 6) It cot-: 4 C7 4 C N Ln CCU r^ O 6 6 LO M P-Ca M N Lt) O CD 6) - e- CY) t'- CD C) C) Nr Imo- m m O O N 0 CA It It LO N N

t) Q ) C6oc t' C C) N N 0)CT) LO d r Cx)

C) 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 6 6 _6 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 a0E

N0

O O O O C) O O O 0 O O CI O O O C] 0 o OC C7 O O O O O O 0 CD O O O

a)0 O O O O O O O O O O D O 6

CoO 0075

N0

LIq LO C) LO O 00 O CO C) O O O O V LO CO C) (S] CO vh- r-. LA LO o co O LC) 0 C) O O LO co T i- cf) N V- N

Eco 0) o6 O d N 6 CV 4 6 c6 6 co

cow `-I t)3 (3) 00 0 C37 d ) N Lt') LO CD

O M C 0 0 C) W T CQ C}7 Ct]O

a) N

C) O g) r T . LC) CS] 0) (0 OCO ti T O T N T tCV r T r Co

Co O c LO O CD O N 0 CD 0 C) 0 O D L() r'. 0) CO 00Q Lf) m h CD co O N- 0 O O O O 00 N 'd' co T r N41 r- 0 cli Ln ti Lri ^t 0 co o N of cD CD coo0 CO N ' t t N N. tom- o0 r N N (C CO

O CD CX3 T 00 C3) o co o CD coN ai Ln N C^ co

mQ 0 (0 CON r T T

CD Lt) Lt) CJ O Li) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co co r'. N- Co Co NCD I` ( Lt) 0 t,- 0 CD 0 O O O L.t) 0)) T d LC) CO I- N

m ti: cv 0 ai Lci 6 Cy vi d c^i ti r T ti cot-- N. 0 (0 0) CD N-. U 00 CD 't 0 txi

CO Lt) O r 00 r~ O T cD 1 ; 1 " r r

N A c N06

0)CD t('J

C BCy T r r N

co CD cD 0 D N- Cl 0 o 0 0 0 O Ln N "t €` 0 r-- .--M tf) w Lt) 0 0) O m O O O O O LO CO M CO NO) m C3i (6 6 d' 0 c r i co, 0 Cfl 6 O ° co m

tl) (0 C7, CD N L(3 Co 't t- N LC) co Co (0 N--C O Ln ' v- M Cta N r- T CJ3 CA 0 0)

N 0 N00 a0 l-

M NCDN^ T T T

Zr

CL Q)U- E a)

I1.E

Orr/n^Vr 4-

0 ^ .' a) 92 N C E'111.1.E

U)W E "0

Q) -M :3 D C) L -C © 1 U N

20

c)0

U a^ +, D ci D C) q4)r- >

o^

Ot,

0

- 7H

Q

O - U E 2Lp^ O LL

o`^_ U) td cu

R3 to 0 ' E .ca (D 4- C

C) r)

cri O Ll N M M

'C O (U > E C O tll

O E•- Z3 N00

LL ry (DE ^-• EU ^'

cc3v Dl

Qp U

0Wp) (D X

CaO - C[7 U

Ng O

Q( O L- Q a) 0

LLi O

3:D= U L)

©0 rraa11 a)4^ 4.1ca 45 Z 4(5a) 0 a) c z +- OV

Q- c o t= 3 ti) La

oW a L a U)

(D (D0C: -0 . .

°0 0 0

^ L o z>

zc > I- I o r i

Page 5: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDERSEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008

CATEGORIES 2007-------------------------

2008 DIFFERENCE

Total Collected For General Fund 339,338 .1 9 289 , 368.74 (49,969.45)

Total County Tax Revenue 200,160.00 170,079.75 (30,080.25)

Fees Collected and Paid to County 139,178.19 119,288.99 (19,889.20)

-Recording Fees Collected for Gen. Fund 121,461.25 101,691.55 (19,769.70)

-Financing Statement Fees 985.00 680.00. (305.00)

-Photo Copies 8,183.54 11,094.88 2,911.34

-RHSPS-County 8,330.00 5,682.00 (2,648.00)

-Interest 218.40 140.56 (77.84)

Total Collected For Recorder Record Fund 36,764 . 00 26,632.00 (10,132.00)

RRF @ Fees 27,573.00 19,974.00 (7,599.00)

GIS 9,191.00 6,658.00 (2,533.00)

Total State Tax Revenue 400,320.00 340,159.50 (60,160.50)

Statistics

Total Documents Recorded - Filed 9,220 6,684 (2,536)

Real Estate Docs Recorded 9,132 6,615 (2,517)

Financing Statements Filed 59 43 (16)

Deed with Declarations for Revenue Stamps 969 639 (330)

Number of Documents Recorded without Fee 29 26 (3)

Average Number of Daily Documents 485 318 (167)

Number of Working Days 19 21 2

Page 6: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

OO

Ci)N.

O LC1O T

[O

OC)

CDO

C7C7

C)Lr)

COd

COCD

C)CD

03T

TT

e.-: rv^ m in n! ti t^ --A Ct 'CP NCD 0) Lo N 0)

r- - clCA

CDM

'd'Co

COCO

CO

CO CD Li) . Lf) V -r CON• CO

COLnCl

co OT-

N O N (fl C D d• O N O O O O O00 L[) CO N O a C)) Q O O O 0

CO O O Lf3 N 03 d- t CO O T N-d CO N- Lf) N- T r N N CO CO r Nrl-

O < N• CO CO O N ) CO CO 0 O 0 N>- F- c) Li) CO ti CrJ O) 0 N O O O OLL 0 N r- d r r C) d• CY) r LC)

^- N^ N' C3) N^ T T d CO U)Cr) T r r CO

0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O 0 C) C) CD O O C) C] O

C) C) CD O O O O O O O O CD C)O C O O CD O O O O O O O C?O O O © O O C] CD C'^ CD CD CJ O

CD ti0 O" N

O N d C3) CA CO N

N U) d0 CO N NNO D) OT O Tr T

0

co0ON

c^ t!) O LC) CD CO O CO O C) O CD C7N+ N• Ci) Ln CD CO a Ln O CD CD O U )co C) CO O d' N O N 4 O CO CS)tD N CO C) CO C7) CO t CO N. Ln LnCO © tit CD O O CL) CO C7) CD T

C T e- c- M

O 0 ) Ln 0 It 0 0 0 O O CDO O T N O LQ C7 'd. O O O O

N Ck7 O CO T Lr, CO O CO d CO CD TE O CD N- CC) C), 0 CO T CD N- CnO O cl r r d^ O T C+] N N Lf^

N OO CO CO N rn

O OO CO NO C^ N r r

d' Li, CO G) CO CO Tta T et CO N T NCO CO CD COCD CD

N CO LO CO N o0C1j r C7) d•C3) CA

LnCLE

00fna)a)LL. w ^ O

C^ CD H Cl)

C3)

Page 7: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

COUNTY OF KANECOUNTY ASSESSMENT OFFICEMark D . Armstrong, CIAO

Supervisor of AssessmentsHolly A. Winter, CIAO/I

Chief Deputy Supervisor of Assessments

County Government Center719 Batavia Avenue, Building C

Geneva, Illinois 60134-3000(630) 208-3818

Memorandum

To: The Honorable Chairman Michael Kenyon and thePublic Service Committee of Kane County Board

From: Mark D. Armstrong

Date: October 15, 2008

Re: Monthly report

Attached is a copy of the October issue of KANE ASSESSMENT NEWS, ETC., which contains thecustomary statistical data (page 6) that I have reported to the committee.

Additionally, I am pleased to report that 14 out of 16 townships have already certified their 2008assessment roll to the County Assessment Office:

frd1,H3i01R7, 'i r,r'^y" [-:Z!0- 22E 'n .n.......:. n..a..

Hampshire May 28, 2008 June 12, 2007 July 14, 2006Rutland September 19, 2008 November 2, 2007 October 20, 2006

Dundee October '15, 2007 November 17 2006

i unington September 30, 2008 November 2, 2007 December 4, 2006............ ............Plato August 6 2008 August 16, 2007 August 282006

Elgin September 2 September 17, 2007 September 21, 2006

Virgil July 18, 2008 J my 27, : 2007 August 25, 2006

Campton August 6, 2008 October 12, 2007 September 29, 2006

St . Charles Ju 7e 3D, 2008 July 12, 2007 July 18, 2006

Kaneville August 29 2008 2007October 31 October 30 2006, , . ,

81ackberi August29, 2008 Au gust 15, 2007... ... . July 25, 2006

Geneva August 4, 2008 November 5, 2007 October 30, 2006Batavia August 1, 20'08 September 17, 2007 September 29, 2006

Big Rock May 23, 2008 May 18, 2007 June 23, 2006

Sugar Grove August 29, 2008 October 1, 2007 Qctobei 31, 2006

Aurora November 6, 2007 November 6, - 2006

At this point in 2007, we had only eleven townships reporting; in 2006, we had only nine. As youcan see, certification dates.are still coming in earlier over the past two years; hopefully, this trendwill continue.

If you have questions or comments, please don 't hesitate to contact meat your earliest convenience.

Our Mission : An equitable assessment for every parcel.

Page 8: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

A publication ofthe Kane County

AssessmentOffice

Inside this issue:

Homeownership Expo2008 in Aurora 2

Property Tax ClinicsContinue in October 3

Ask Mark: AssessmentPublication 4

PTAB rules on KaneCounty Properties 4

2008 TownshipCertification Progress 5

Assessment OfficeSeptember Production 6

KANE COUNTY

ASSESSMENT OFFICE

Mark D. Armstrong, CIAO

Supervisor of Assessments

Holly A. Winter, CIA0/1

Chief Deputy

Supervisor of Assessments

719 South Batavia Avenue

Building CGeneva, Illinois 601 34-3000Voice: (630) 208-381 8Fax: (630) 208-3824www.co.I(ane. il.us/soa

From Mark's Desk...

Building Consensus for Tax ReformAbout ten years ago, I was elected chairman of the St. Charles

Plan Commission. Part of our task was to make recommendationsto the City Council about amendments to the ordinance that wereproposed from time to time. St. Charles had been engaged in mu-nicipal planning since 1928, but the first true zoning ordinance inSt. Charles was adopted in 1960. It had them been updated on apiecemeal basis in most of the years since. I soon came to the con-clusion that instead of trying to fix the old ordinance, we shouldwrite a whole new one. And in May 2003, I was appointed to chair aCommission that would spend the next three-and-a-half years devel-

oping a new zoning ordinance for St. Charles.

In the beginning, we thought we would finish in about 24 months-but it ended uptaking 40. It was a lot of work, but the end result was worth it. To.this day, I firmly be-lieve that one of the main reasons for our success was that we took our time, sought in-put from all stakeholders (property owners, residents, developers, etc.), listened to allsides of all issues, and built consensus for our proposed new ordinance.

There are some parallels to this experience and to the Illinois Property Tax Code.There have been property taxes in Illinois since its admission to the Union in 1818(remember, property tax law was one of Abraham Lincoln's specialties as a lawyer), butour current law dates primarily to the Revenue Act of 1939-with many, many, manychanges made piecemeal since that time.

Last fall, the state legislature created the Illinois Property Tax Reform and Relief TaskForce. The act that created the task force mandated that it "shall conduct a study of theproperty tax system in Illinois and investigate methods of reducing the reliance on prop-erty taxes and alternative methods of funding." The act also required that the task force"shall submit its findings to the General Assembly no later than January 1, 2010, at whichtime the Task Force is dissolved."

This summer, I had the opportunity to attend one of the Task Force's meetings, and Iwas impressed by their process. They are taking their time, seeking input from all stake-holders of the issue (including the input of the assessment community), listening to allsides of all issues, and building consensus for reforming our property tax system. Theyare also trying to stay on schedule and finish by January 1, 2010 (as my commissionfound out, that can be a tall order).

As legislative and policy chairman for Area One (roughly north of 1-80) of the IllinoisCounty Assessment Officer's Association, I am currently working with my counterparts inother counties to make legislative proposals, including recommendations to the TaskForce. I am hopeful that we will be able to make a positive impact on the work of theTask Force, and help build consensus for a better property tax system for the citizens ofIllinois.

Your thoughts and comments are always welcome.

O r M i s s i o n : equitable assessment for every.parcel

Page 9: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

Page 2

The Kane County

Assessment Office

will be on hand to

review the

exemption status of

everyone in

attendance.

tance.• Homestead Exemptions, which provide direct property

County Assessment Office to bepart of Homeownersh ip Expo. 2008

On Saturday, October 18, 2008 the public is invited to the HomeownershipExpo 2008 at East Aurora High School Freshman Center, 5th and Smith in Aurora,Illinois. The Expo will run from 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., and the event is free and opento the public.

Home Ownership Expo 2008 is a collaborative partnership of Joseph Corpora-tion, City of Aurora, Kane County, Red Cross and the Aurora Fire Department.

Workshops include "First time Home Buyer", "Maintain and Remodel" and"Protect your Investment". There will also be a Fire Prevention Demonstration andFree Fire Prevention Kits. Exhibitors will include housing related firms, the KaneCounty Treasurer, the Kane County Assessment Office, and other governmentagencies.

The County entities participating as part of the Kane County Board's Help forHomeowners initiative. The Kane County Assessment Office will be on hand to re-view the exemption status of everyone in attendance. At previous clinics, home-owners were found eligible for many exemptions they did not yet receive, includingthe General Homestead Exemption, the Senior Citizen Homestead Exemption, theSenior Citizen Assessment Freeze homestead Exemption, and the Disabled Per-sons Homestead Exemption.

Help for Homeowners does not create any new programs, but is designed tomake homeowners aware of the programs that already exist, such as:

• The Housing Rehabilitation Program, which helps homeowners maintain theirhomes by providing funds to correct code violations and eliminate substandardliving conditions.

• The Emergency Repair Program, which helps homeowners who are facing acrisis home-repair situation.

• The FirstTime Homebuyer Program, which helps make the dream of homeownership a reality.

• Foreclosure Prevention Counseling, which helps Kane County homeowners fac-ing the prospect of defaulting on their mortgage with free counseling and assis-

owner is qualified. If not, the staff will assist the homeowner through the exemp-tion process right there.

For more information about these programs, see the County's Help for Home-owners site at www.countyofkane.or i^/Pap-esZ Hel lp ForHomeOwners.as px.

To check the status of your own homestead exemptions, go to the County As-sessment Office web site at www.co.kane.il.us Zweba ppsZSOA/kane.htm or call theoffice at (630) 208-3818.

tax benefits to qualifyinghomeowners.The Expo will have two depu-

ties from the County AssessmentOffice on-site who will be able toinstantly check to see if a home-owner has all of the property taxexemptions for which the home-

Page 10: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

see Mbew Is

MO OS of a began it

SOUufo Aveune8,b,D8Va7 OHM coos.:Kane County Board719 South Batavia AvenueGeneva, Illinois 670134000.Phone : (630) 208-3818Fax., (630) 208-3824tivsg^w co.kane.il.us/soa/t^nr.htrn

Page 3

Kane County Board of ReviewOffers Property Tax Clinics

00,a0b, low 21day, ©vm

Review

The Kane County Board of Review will offereight Property Tax Clinics for Kane County tax-payers this fall. The clinics will:

.Help taxpayers understand how propertytaxes work , including an explanation of re-cent changes in the law.

• Dispel myths about taxes and assess-ments.

Explain the appeal process , and providethe necessary forms and rules for filing ap-peals.

• Provide an opportunity for taxpayers tomake sure they have all homestead ex-emptions to which they are entitled.

The clinics will also include in=formation from the Kane County

's Help for HomeownersBoardinitiative.

The clinic is not a forum to discuss any spe-cific individual assessment; these questionsare best directed to the Assessor of the Town-ship in which the property is located.

Both taxpayers and practitioners (attorneys,appraisers, brokers , etc.) are welcome to at-tend . For more information , call the Board ofReview office at (630) 208-3818.

Page 11: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

Only

newspapers

published in

Kane County can

be considered

for publications.

A monthly Q and A with Supervisor of Assessments Mark Armstrong

Ask Mark. .How do you choose anewspaper to. publishassessment changes?

In Illinois, the primarymeans that taxpayers arenotified of assessmentchanges is publication in anewspaper of "generalcirculation", and the mainrequirement in choosing anewspaper is its place of

publication.

For the purposes of theproperty tax code, theplace of publication is thelocation where a newspa-per is first made availableto the general public; thislocation can be a news-stand, retail store, vendingbox, delivery point, or amail room where the news-papers are labeled for maildelivery. A newspaper mayhave no more than oneplace of publication.

In selecting a newspaperin which to publish theassessment changes, thestate property tax code hasthe following requirement:

The publication ... shallbe printed in some publicnewspaper or newspaperspublished in the county. Inevery township or assess-

Page 4

ment district in which thereis published one or morenewspapers of general cir-culation, the list of thattownship shall be publishedin one of the newspapers.(35 ILCS 200/12-10, em-phasis added)

Therefore, only newspa-pers published in KaneCounty (or in a particulartownship) can be consid-ered for publications.

"Ask Mark" is a monthlyfeature of KANE ASSESSMENTNEWS, ETC. To submit aquestion to Kane CountySupervisor of AssessmentsMark Armstrong, e-mail it toKaneSOACco.kane.il.Lis orsend it to Mark at 719 S.Batavia Ave., Geneva, IL60134.

PTAB Rules on Kane County PropertySPRINGFIELD-The Illinois Property Tax

Appeal Board (PTAB) made the followingrulings in September 2008:

12-17-476-004 - Kohl's DepartmentStores, Inc. appealed the 2005 ruling of theKane County Board of Review that placedthe assessment of this Geneva Townshipcommercial property at $2,499,984. Priorto the hearing the parties reached anagreement as to the assessment of thesubject property. The PTAB concurred andruled the correct assessment to be$2,031,985. (Docket 05-02567.001-C-3).

15-05-451-003 - Oberweis Dairy ap-pealed the 2006 ruling of the Kane CountyBoard of Review that placed the assess-ment of this Aurora Township commercialproperty at $411,586. Prior to the hearingthe parties reached an agreement as to theassessment of the subject property. ThePTAB concurred and ruled the correct as-sessment to be $354,094. (Docket 06-01829.001-0-2).

09-36-276-034 - Ohio Avenue LLC ap-pealed the 2006 ruling of the Kane CountyBoard of Review that placed the assess-

ment of this St. Charles Township industrialproperty at $3,005,260. Prior to the hear-ing the parties reached an agreement as tothe assessment of the subject property.The PTAB concurred and ruled the correctassessment to be $2,930,821. (Docket06-01909.001-1-2).

12-17-476-004 - Kohl's DepartmentStores, Inc. appealed the 2006 ruling of theKane County Board of Review that placedthe assessment of this Geneva Townshipcommercial property at $2,683,483. Priorto the hearing the parties reached anagreement as to the assessment of thesubject property. The PTAB concurred andruled the correct assessment to be$2,075,000. (Docket 06-01983.001-C-3).

12-23-380-006 - Robert & BonnieWozniak appealed a 2006 assessment of$132,469 based on a prior year decision ofthe PTAB placing the EAV at $116,557.Based on the prior ruling and a townshipequalization factor of 1.0332, the PTABruled that the correct equalized assessedvalue of the property for 2006 should be$120,426. (Docket 06-02831.001-R-1).

Page 12: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

Page 5

Ten township

assessment rolls

have already

been published.

2008 Certification ProgressThe 2008 assessment rolls continue to be processed by the Kane County As-

sessment Office, and more progress is coming with each passing day. As of thiswriting, ten townships have been fully processed, with notices mailed and pub-lished in local newspapers. Four more have recently certified their rolls to the Su-pervisor of Assessments and are in various stages of review. The remaining twotownships are anticipated to be certified within the next ten days.

Once a township's assessment roll has been published, taxpayers have 30days to file a complaint with the Kane County Board of Review. Complaint formsand the Board's Rules of Government are available on the Board's web site atwww.co.kane.il.us soa bor.htm.

1 .

01-Hampshire May 28 August 7 The MidWeek

02 Rutland September 19

03-Dundee

04-Burlington September 30

05-Plato August 6 September 19 The Courier News

06-Elgin September',2

07-Virgil July 18 August 14 Elburn Herald.11

08-Campton August , '6 September 18 Elbur'n Herald

09-St . Charles June 30 August 21 St. Charles Republican

10-Kar^eve 'August 29 October lburn Herald

11-Blackberry August 29

enva12GGe August 4 September 4 Kane County Chronicle

12B-Batavia August 1 September 11 Kane County Chronicle

13-Big Rock fviay 23., August 7 Eiburri Herald

14-Sugar Grove August 29 October 9 Elburn Herald

5;-Aurora

r 1 I

September 10

October 20

September 15

October 20.

September 22

November 1

Octobbr;6

October 14

Septer L er 10 '.:

November 10

Page 13: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

Page 6

In September 2008,

the County

Assessmen t Office

processed more

than 5,700

documents.

September 2008 Production ReportDuring the month of September 2008, the County Assessment Office proc-

essed more than 5,700 documents, bringing the year-to-date total to nearly55,000. Major work in September also included the certification of the assess-ment rolls of four townships to the Board of Review (bringing the year-to-datetotal to eight), and processing the receipt of assessment rolls from an addi-tional six townships.

Deeds

Transfer Declarations 969 9,051

Name/Address Changes 1,822 27,525

Homestead Exemption Applications 333 6,359

Homestead Removals 63 585

Senior Exemption Applications 275 1,528

Senior/Freeze Renewals 799 15,311

Veteran/Disabled Exemptions* 0 0

Assessment Corrections

Certificates of Error

Subdivisions

Total Documents Processed

Revenue/Sale of Data

Web Site Visits**

Web Page Views ** 4,273 4,273

Property Tax Appeal Board Filings 19 134

Tax Parcels

Parcels Added

Parcels Deleted

t!

1,511 14,468

270 595

310 2,366

12 144

6,364 77,932

$3,423 $74,202

2,799 2,799

270 5,947

173 1,230

Net Parcel Change

U r rI.A,

i t Câ A ^' : IV E751,131 10,834

639 5,599

1,746 17,149

109 2,188

24 406

203 1,998

1,072 10,068

101 740

8 915

698 4,823

5 102

5,736 54,822

$4,506 $59,620

5,642 38,932

12,468 58,007

202

240 1,926

221 921

Lim f §lili

19 1,005

*Veteran/Disabled Exemptions began to be processed in February 2008.**Web page statistics began in September 2007

97 4,717

7rMIN 17 W7wguru id N

Page 14: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

MONTHLY RECORDER REPORTSeptember 30, 2008

FEES COLLECTED

General Recordings 101,691.55Financing Statement Fees 680.00General Photo 11,094.88RHSPS-County 5,682.00Interest paid on.Checking Account 40.08Interest paid on Revenue Account 100.48

FEES COLLECTED - PAID TO COUNTY 119,288.99

COUNTY PORTION OF REAL ESTATE TAX REVENUEAmount Collected by Kane County Recorder 76,428.75Amount Collected by Chicago Title 93,651.00TOTAL COUNTY TAX REVENUE PAID TO TREASURER 170,079.75

TOTAL COLLECTED FOR GENERAL FUND 289,368.74

STATE PORTION OF REAL ESTATE REVENUEAmount Collected by County Recorder 152,857.50Amount Collected by Chicago Title Company 187,302.00

TOTAL STATE TAX REVENUE 340 , 159.50

FEES COLLECTED FOR RECORDER'S RECORD FUND (AUTOMATION FUND)RRF a© Fees 19,974.00GIS 6,658.00

*****************

TOTAL COLLECTED FOR RECORDER RECORD FUND 26,632.00

Documents Recorded without Fee 26

Submitted By:

Approved By:

*****************

Dated:

Page 15: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

MOlITHLY'REPORT OF THE KANECOU.NTV`CLERK

SEPTEMBER 2008

2007YTD

$15,405.00

. $ .31395 - 00$154,500.00'$314,0 11 Q0'

2007MONTH RECEIPTS$1,195:00 Notary Com m & Co_ rttifificcat

atses

$345.00 Assumed Business Names...... ...... ............ . .:::.... .......................$7,050:00 Passport Fees ......................

$30,077.00 Copies of Record._-.. ---_ .......................

20.08 .MONTH

2008YTD

$1,391.00! $14,353..00$235100.. $3,385:00

$21,325 .00 $66,360:00............$31,,322.00 $314693:00

$8.,500.00 $.............

19Z,a76:07$455 92 $49,444 37 _$206 .90 $39, 439:59$212 a0 .. $10,043°97

$5868 00 $48,601 00$12,870.00 $133 188:Q0

$236 $71.08$377.14 V:2)424.84 . I

$4,454 ' 0.0 1 $46230 . 001$1,630 Q0 ^......... $6,925 00 I

$69,848 .: 42.; .. .... $937$734 '.85..._...._$6600} $587:00

$160j004:00' $4,556..00 Tex Redemption Fees..$30,618 87 :$932.02 Miscellaneous Election Fees:$31,603 .73 $204:80 11![icelfaneous , Tax Extensioin

$3,193 88 $154.00 Miscellaneous Clerk Fees$49T60800 . $5,202 00 Marriage Licenses_...,.: .._.. ....

$135,302 . 00 $14, 256.00 3 Vital Records Automation. Fund.... ..... . ... ................. ....... ........... ... . .. . .. . .. . .. .....$3,750 . 25 : $281.03 Interest Fee :Account

$25,590 88 $496.29 Interest: Tax Redemption Fund$25,774.00 $3486 00 ;State Fund for D :5th Certificates

f lence Fund0 00 $0 00 Marriage Domestic V o$952,756 61.:::.. $68,23514 TOTAL RECEIPTS._ .........................._..

$973°.00. $45:00 NSF Cheeks

1................... .. . .. . ..... .. .. . .. ..... ................................,......

DISBURSEMENTS...... ................... ......... ...................To Kane County Treasurer

$816,481.61 $50,448.14 General Fund$3,486.00 State Fund...........................................................

Marriage Fund ........................$135'362 ._06 ! 514 ,256 00 Vital Records Fund.:....$951,783 .61. $68 , 19014 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS

.....$803,959.85

$4,454.00 ._. _ ..:$1,630.00

$12,87000 $133,188..00........ ...$69,782.42 $937,147.85

Submitted by, Approved by:.John A. Cunningham Mike KenyonKane County Clerk Public Service Committee

Page 16: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

COUNTY CLERK -MONTHY REPORT

2007MONTH

SEPTEMBER 2008

'AX REDEMPTION ACCOUNT2008 ........tTH

$374;950.36.1 Beginning' Balance $59...... .69RECEIPTS:_,.... _._....._._ ... ..

$371,371:62 Tax Redemption $626,779.30$496 29 Interest $377 14

$745;9.18.26 TOTAL RECEIPTS. $1,220,516.1

... DISBURSEMENTS$284;28824: To Tax Buyers

X484,121:..91.91

$496 29 ....... To Pee Account $377.14.....:. ..5284_784.53 TOTAL F)I'.qR[JR.gFMFNT.q $484,496.05$461;133.73 ENDING BALANCE $736,017.08

Page 17: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

Status of State of Illinois Grants for County Clerk 10/14/2008

Reimbursement for 1115/03 Election Judges

DateIssued

03/11/2003

To BeApplied For

Pending Received

$27,000.00Voter Registration Tapes 07/23/2003 $62.08Voter Registration Tapes 02/17/2004 $60.94Voter Registration Tapes 05/17/2004 $62.06Reimbursement for March 16 Election Judges 05/21/2004 $27,500.00Voter Registration Tapes 07/26/2004 $63.25Voter Registration Tapes 12/23/2004 $68.58Reimbursement for November 2 Election Judges 01 /24/2005 $27,500.00Voter Registration Tapes 02/28/2005 $69.24Reimbursement for February 22 Election Judges 04/14/2005 $8,925.00Voter Registration Tapes 04/27/2005 $69.31Voter Registration Tapes 05/17/2005 $69.71Reimbursement for April 5 Election Judges 06/01/2005 $23,950.00Voter Registration Tapes 07/15/2005 $70.17HAVA Grant for Voting Equipment 03/09/2006 $1,760,789.54

Punch Card BuyoutVoter Registration Tapes 07/17/2006 $67.06HAVA Phase II 08/15/2006 $510,077.54HAVA Discretionary Money 08/25/2006 $69,771.00HAVA VAID Sub Grant 08/25/2006 $8,720.00Voter Registration Tapes 01/11/2007 $69.39Voter Registration Tapes 03/30/2007 $69.39Reimbursement for February 27 Election Judges 04/19/2007 $5,225.00Reimbursement for April 17 Election Judges 06/06/2007 $19,975.00Voter Registration Tapes 08/06/2007 $70.58Death Certificate Surcharge 12/21/2007 $5,179.00HAVA Alternate Language Accessibility Grant 11/16/2007 $3,867.41

10/09/2007 $38,316.5010/07/2008 $28,468.22

Applies For 9/23/08 $32,680.00HAVA Voting Access for Individuals with Disabilities 10/07/2008 $19,571.00Reimbursement for February 5 Election Judges 04/23/2008 $25,025.00Reimbursement for March Election Judges 04/29/2008 $20,400.00Reimbursement for November Early Voting Judges

Estimated $7,920.00Reimbursement for November Election Judges

Estimated $45,600.00

Totals $53,520.00 $32,680.00 $2,631,131.97

Total of all Grants $2,717,331.97

Page 18: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

From the Office ofJohn A CunninghamKane County ClerkP.O. Box 70Geneva, li 601346301232-5950

ASSUMED NAMEPROCESSED BY MONTH AND YEAR

MONTH 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999JAN 24 20 31 29 42 23 33 24FEB 28 36 22 24 30 16 23 32MAR 61 38 35 46 44 41 39 43APR 45 32 41 32 33 41 36 37MAY 36 50 41 35 40 46 36 39JUN 42 38 38 33 27 35 38 30JUL 40 23 31 38 28 34 39 29AUG 35 23 34 28 32 34 31 35SEP 39 26 40 23 20 36 33 30OCT 33 32 28 42 52 29 37 33NOV 40 19 28 34 26 26 23 43DEC . 29 30 17 39 32 47 14 39

TOTAL 452 367 386 403' 406 408 382 414

MONTH 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007JAN 35 37 44 41 46 44 46 55FEB 36 36 35 65 47 46 63 39MAR 39 45 45 42 73 62 71 53APR 36 40 62 51 88 56 68 75MAY 51 39 65 57 53 51 50 50JUN 30 52 54 47 64 49 57 56JUL 39 38 51 55 52 44 50 49AUG 35 53 54 43 62 60 63 50SEP 35 28 47 48 43 47 70 38OCT 35 48 40 41 41 53 49 58NOV 34 29 44 42 43 47 37 40DEC 31 29 34 52 66 37 32. 23

TOTAL 436 474 575 584 678 596 656 586

MONTH 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 20 1 4 2015JAN 44FEB 53MAR 51APR 59MAY 48JUN 52JUL 49AUG 47SEP 36OCTNOVDEC

TOTAL 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 19: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

From the Office ofJohn A CunninghamKane County ClerkP.O. Box 70Geneva, 11 60134630/232-5950

MARRIAGE LICENSESPROCESSED BY MONTH AND YEAR

MONTH 199 1 1992 1993 1 994 1995 1996 1997 1 998 1999JAN 183 189 152 127 154 178 171 179 148FEB 159 186 179 171 166 186 257 162 170MAR 152 146 205 218 229 209 333 199 218APR 245 189 164 246 254 274 287 218 249MAY 286 278 228 316 357 357 323 293 320JUN 308 312 418 358 321 315 330 315 366J UL 313 290 256 295 286 323 348 220 355AU G 319 319 314 481 376 326 380 310 347SEP 341 351 307 310 301 292 353 337 374OCT 346 283 257 237 243 281 309 205 264NOV 207 185 207 214 208 178 183 171 180DEC 185 207 198 203 162 214 236 228 185

TOTAL 3044 2935 2885 3176 3057 3133 3510 2837 3176

MONTH 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008JAN 175 273 171 199 183 178 196 194 191FEB 181 260 163 219 193 173 208 181 173MAR 228 322 208 194 208 225 244 203 212APR 198 369 155 256 268 268 241 247 269MAY 348 314 360 312 309 335 370 356 317JUN 318 329 359 310 369 366 381 370 331JUL 323. 326 339 371 352 334 307 336 355AUG 397 352 359 332 336 390 366 372 376SEP 303 334 304 319 374 319 239 306 326OCT 249 281 287 270 232 224 250 253'NOV 194 201 180 177 181 197 203 152DEC 164 192 198 213 203 171 203 168

TOTAL 3078 3553 3083 3172 3208 3180 3208 3138 2550

Page 20: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

From the Office ofJohn A CunninghamKane County ClerkP. O. Box 70Geneva, IL 60134630/232-5950

PASSPORT APPLICATIONSPROCESSED BY MONTH AND YEAR

MONTH 1986 1987 1988 1989 1 990 1991 1992 1 993 1994JAN 182 121 127 160 176 115 157 136 136FEB 143 132 124 156, 200 136 170 147 147MAR 153 202 194 163 184 127 162 185 185APR 98 166 171 139 160 152 154 197 197MAY 98 130 121 125 186 113 137 141 141JUN 88 141 102 111 135 95 120 143 143JUL 103 125 74 114 122 127 97 111 111AUG 85 112 113 92 119 102 110 116 116SEP 84 82 79 94 86' 110 69 93 93OCT 96 88 73 75 74 289 88 92 92NOV 54 74 65 92 93 52 90 108 108DEC 92 .103 90 75 90 52. 85 111 111

TOTAL 1276 1476 1580 1580

MONTH 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003JAN 178 228 282 290 316 425 546 529 531FEB 195 211 220 319 336 377 456 382 418MAR 207 229 249 310 354 465 536 398 402APR 179 127 240 238 313 319 300 482 359MAY 185 172 219 218 225 333 360 403 351JUN 154 131 136 100 253 317 321 288 259J U L 104. 134 168 188 188 223 226 285 245AUG 146 157 147 220 238 247 284 381 268SEP 66 125 127 139 181 210 180 218 239OCT 79 125 149 149 171 237 228 283 273NOV 107 139 134 178 203 233 192 255 240DEC 88 148 133 178 194 198 219 277 331

TOTAL 1688 1926

1333

2204

1396

2527

1625

2972

1470

3584

1439

3848

:Ja. i^,a ..::.^ ..n;,€we ; .._ . . iz'.. , v^. !¢_... .y. ^ ^di,e .k^:"!F.C "y ,,^. •,u$ . ^ s .. r .

4181NJ

3916

MONTH 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

JAN 491 280 359 915 484

FEB 419 250 295 518 332

MAR 383 328 374 844 403

APR 325 255 285 538 299

MAY 228 230 272 . 411 246

JUN 248 220 193 399 225

JUL 128 189 194 406 152

AUG 230 228 259 365 144

SEP 144 194 189 236 87

OCT 183 180 277 295

NOV 179 178 315 246DEC 165 230 414 212

TOTAL 3123 2762 3426 5385 2372 0 0 0 0

Page 21: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

Hispanic Advisory Cornrnittee..Meeting

.Tkur°sday, Oc tober 23, 20086: 30 p. in. Governrnent Center - bldg.. 'B"719 SS Batavia Ave.. -Geneva IL. 60134

1) Introductions

2) Acknowledgement of members for biling:recruitments

3) Update ©f November 4ti' election

4) Final Question.s :5) Adjournment

al. election judge,

cc: Asst. States Atteriney's'Oftic.e Civil .Di.visio ,Counts' Clerl ,_Public _Service Cousin:

Cunni.nglhann,.Bennett;.Mitchell

Page 22: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

STATE OF ILLINOIS

COUNTY OF KANE

RESOLUTION NO. 08 -

AUTHORIZING INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTWITH THE VILLAGE OF PINGREE GROVE

(SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NO. 18 - HERITAGE DISTRICT)

WHEREAS, the Village of Pingree Grove (the "Village") has heretofore established or will establishSpecial Service Area No. 18 (the "Special Service Area") within the Village; and

WHEREAS, the Special Service Area is for the installation of public improvements madenecessary by development within the village; and

WHEREAS, the Village desires that the County of Kane enter into an intergovernmental agreementto extend, bill, and collect the special tax levied by the Village for the properties in the Village's SpecialService Area with full reimbursement to be made to the County for any and all direct or indirect costsassociated with the billing and collection of the special tax.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Kane County Board that the Chairman thereof ishereby authorized to enter into an intergovernmental agreement with the Village of Pingree Grove, for itsSpecial Service Area No. 18, which agreement shall be filed with the Kane County Clerk, for extension,billing and collection of the special tax assessed for the Village of Pingree Grove Special Service Area No.18.

Passed by the Kane County Board on November 12, 2008.

John A. CunninghamClerk, County BoardKane County, Illinois

Vote:YesNoVoiceAbstentions

Karen McConnaughayChairman, County BoardKane County, Illinois

111GA-PingreeGrove

Page 23: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

STATE OF ILLINOIS

COUNTY OF KANE

RESOLUTION NO. 08

AUTHORIZING INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTWITH THE CITY OF AURORA

(SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NO . 141 - COUNTY SQUIRE ESTATES LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS)

WHEREAS, the City of Aurora (the "City") has heretofore established or will establish SpecialService Area No. 141 (the "Special Service Area ") within the City; and

WHEREAS, the Special Service Area is for the installation of public improvements madenecessary by development within the City; and

WHEREAS, the City desires that the County of Kane enter into an intergovernmental agreement toextend, bill, and collect the special tax levied by the City for the properties in the City's Special ServiceArea with full reimbursement to be made to the County for any and all direct or indirect costs associatedwith the billing and collection of the special tax.

. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Kane County Board that the Chairman thereof ishereby authorized to enter into an intergovernmental agreement with the City of Aurora, for its SpecialService Area No. 141, which agreement shall be filed with the Kane County Clerk, for extension, billing andcollection of the special tax assessed for the City of Aurora Special Service Area 141.

Passed by the Kane County Board on November 12, 2008.

John A. Cunningham Karen McConnaughayClerk, County Board Chairman , County BoardKane County, Illinois Kane County, Illinois

Vote:YesNoVoiceAbstentions

11 I GA-Aurora

Page 24: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

STATE OF ILLINOIS

COUNTY OF KANE

RESOLUTION NO. 08 -

AUTHORIZING INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTWITH THE VILLAGE MONTGOMERY(SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NO. 17)

WHEREAS, the Village of Montgomery (the "Village") has heretofore established Special ServiceArea No. 17 (the "Special Service Area") within the Village; and

WHEREAS, the Special Service Area is for the installation of municipal infrastructure madenecessary by development within the Village; and

WHEREAS, the Village desires that the County of Kane enter into an intergovernmental agreementto extend, bill and collect the special tax levied by the Village for the properties in the Village's SpecialService Area with full reimbursement to be made to the County for any and all direct or indirect costsassociated with the billing and collection of the special tax.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Kane County Board that the Chairman thereof ishereby authorized to enter into an intergovernmental agreement with the Village of Montgomery, for itsSpecial Service Area No. 17, which agreement shall be filed with the Kane County Clerk, for extension,billing and collection of the special tax assessed for the Village of Montgomery Special Service Area No.17.

Passed by the Kane County Board on November 12, 2008.

John A. Cunningham Karen McConnaughayClerk, County Board Chairman, County BoardKane County, Illinois Kane County, Illinois

Vote:YesNoVoiceAbstentions

1 OIGA-Montgomery

Page 25: KENYON, Allan, Collins, de la Isla , Lewis, Kudlicki ......COMPARISON REPORT OF RECORDER SEPTEMBER 2007 VS SEPTEMBER 2008 CATEGORIES 2007-----2008 DIFFERENCE Total Collected For General

STATE OF ILLINOIS

COUNTY OF KANE

RESOLUTION NO. 08 -

AMENDING 2008 COUNTY CLERK BUDGETFISCAL YEAR 2008

WHEREAS, the Kane County Clerk has applied for a grant from the Illinois State Boardof Elections pursuant to federal monies received under Title II, Section 251 of the HelpAmerica Vote Act of 2002 , 42 U.S.C section 15301 - 15545 ("HAVA") (CFDA # 90.401); and

.WHEREAS, the Kane County Clerk has been awarded an additional $48,039.22allocated to Kane County.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Kane County Board that the followingadjustments be made to the FY 2008 budget:

+$48,039.22001.190.191- 60320-Voting Systems & Accessories -$48,039.22

Line item Line Item Was Are funds currently If funds are notDescription personnel/item/service available for this currently available in

approved in original personnel/item/service the specified linebudget or a subsequent in the specified line item, where are the

budget revision? item? funds available?001.190.191-60320 Voting Systems & No No

Accessories

Passed by the Kane County Board on November 12, 2008.

John A. CunninghamClerk, County BoardKane County, Illinois

Vote:YesNoVoiceAbstentions

Karen McConnaughayChairman, County BoardKane County, Illinois

11 Bdgt-Elections