Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ASSESSMENT REPORT ON
SAMPLING OF DIAMOND DRILL CORE
Kenny Township
2.35465
UTM Zone 17 - NAD 83 Projection
5177000Nto5181000N
PREPARED BY:
Elaine Ba.sa, B.Sc. , P.Geo. Martin Ethier, M.Sc.
and 594000E to 596000E UTM
For
RECEIVED JUN Z 1 Z007
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE
Grupo Moje Limited Hinterland Geoscience and Geomatics
Tres-Or Resources Ltd
15 JUNE 2007
1
SUMMARY
Tres-Or Resources Ltd. is exploring for diamonds in a large block of contiguous claims covering parts of 17 townships in the Temagami - Marten River area. The claims are located 40 to 90 km south of known kimberlites of the New Liskeard kimberlite field, in an area highlighted by recent government surveys as favourable for diamond-bearing kimberlites. Exploration fieldwork beginning in June 2002 has identified potential kimberlite targets based on integrated analysis of till samples, airborne geophysics, and ground geophysics.
Fieldwork recently reported consisted of three diamond drill holes based on mag and EM anomalies identified from both airborne and ground magnetic surveys. A total of 399m of diamond drilling were completed with Downing Diamond Drilling from Grenville-sur-Ia-Rouge, Quebec.
The drill target was based on magnetic high occurring on a break in a northwest-trending magnetic linear (dyke) with an indication of a crosscutting northeast linear all with a co-incident moderate VLF-EM conductive response.
The predominant lithology encountered was quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss with varying amounts of amphibolite bands. Mafic and ultramafic dykes were encountered with variable amounts of sulphide mineralization from trace to approximately 10% locally. One very small dyklet was intersected in hole TEM07-01 of clay-like material with a strong carbonate component. No other similar material was encountered.
A total of 17 samples were taken for base and precious metal analysis and 3 samples sent for whole rock analysis. The results of the sampling were not available at the time of writing the drill report and are therefore being filed separately in this report. All drilling costs (except for 1 day spent repairing a portion of private cottage road) were previously filed. Only the costs for the labour, splitting, supervising, processing and reporting are included here.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
rnTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION .............................................................. 6 Previous Work .................................................................................................................. 10 Accessibility, climate, local resources~ infrastructure and physiography ......................... 11 WORK program SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 12
KE-ll DIAMONDDRlLLSAMPLlNG ................................................................................. 12 PROPERTY GEOLOGY .................................................................................................. 13
LITHOLOGIES .................................................................................................................. 13 Drill Log Summaries ......................................................................................................... 13 conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................. 15 List of Personnel ............................................................................................................... 16 References................ . .. ...... . ...... ............... ... .. ....... ...... . ... ...... ...... .. .. ...... ........ .. ................ . ... 1 7 Statement of Qualification Elaine Basa ......................................................................... 18 Statements of Qualification - Martin Ethier ..................................................................... 19 Appendices ........................................................................................................................ 20
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Tres-Or Resources Ltd Temagami area claims with location of work ............... 5
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Tres-Or Resources Claim Data ............................................................................ 6 Table 2. Wholerock Analysis Samples ............................................................................ 12 Table 3. Drill Hole Data ................................................................................................... 12
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1 - Analytical Assay Sheets ......................................................................... 21
3
INTRODUCTION Tres-Or Resources Ltd. (Tres-Or) has assembled a large property covering
64 422 hectares (338 claim) in the Sudbury and Larder Lake Mining Divisions of northeastern Ontario covering NTS map sheets 31M/4, 31L/11, 31L/12, 31L/13, and 31L/14 to explore for diamondiferous kimberlites (Fig. 1). Tres-Or's Temagami property ('the Tres-Or property') extends from Hammell Township in the south to South Lorrain Township 60 km to the north within the Sudbury Mining Division.
Tres-Or's claims cover part of the Lake Timiskaming Structural Zone, an ancient, deep-seated northwest trending structure cutting the Archean Superior Craton and extending into Parautochthonous Belt of the Grenville Province. The Superior Craton is the largest Archean craton in the world, and has yielded some encouraging diamond exploration results recently. More than 30 kimberlite pipes and dykes are known in the Kirkland Lake and New Liskeard areas, some of which are diamondiferous. The kimberlites form a northwest-southeast trend that extends into the Tres-Or property with indicator chemistry and possibly diamond contents improving to the south (Sage, 1996). Allan (2001) reported in a recent Ontario Geological Survey (OGS) open file the recovery of kimberlite indicator minerals, including G10 pyropes and diamond-inclusion chromite from the Tres-Or property area, supporting improving chemistry south of the known kimberlites.
This report describes the sampling of core from a recent drill program of three holes in Kenny Twp that tested a co-incident mag-EM target (KE-l1) east of Marian Lake.
4
o o 8 en ~
o o ~ to ...... l{)
o o o o to ...... l{)
o o o l{) I'-...... l{)
8 o o I'-
~
o o o l{) <D
~
595000 600000 605000
-Tres-Or Resources Ltd Claim Location Map
[l: ~
-- - - - - - . ... _ .-
--Pt III ~E _. r'""1 -.. -
I • • • ,.., --'- • I
L ,...-
30160 ~r2 I (
J] I ---~ \~\ -- - .. _- -
I Kenny drm
~
program -~
~ ~ . .. .. -- _. _ . .. ._- .. - _. -. - 1- .. -+ -" ~ - .
KENNY I
~ GLADMAN
- I
I -_. . --.-
ii.iio- I -- - -- - . - . --
I
[ I
- --- . .- -.- - . _-- ----- 1-' ----- - . .
I
oUuu 0
I I
595000 600000 605000
610000
N
-~ ~- -_ .. -
~ ~ -E
S
.. .. FLETT -
D~HAM ...
,QC I
I ~ .- . - - -
I
, . . -
II II
~ Al'n VlELL
I
... _. - - -
-
I 5000 Meters
610000
01 -" <D o 8 o
~ ex> 01 o o o
~ ex> o o o o
~ -....I o o o o
01 -" en 01 o 8
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Tres-Or's Temagami Diamond Property consists of a large block of
contiguous mining land claims in the Temagami area located in the Sudbury Mining Divisions of northeastern Ontario. The claims are located on unpatented ground covered by lakes, swamps, forest and recently forested ground. A list of claims for the entire Temagami Property can be found in Appendix 1.
The claims were staked between October 2000 and April 2002 by Norman Collins and Roland Collins for Leane Jolin and transferred to Tres-Or Resources Ltd. Additional claims have been staked to the present as land becomes available or interest merits. Tres-Or's contiguous land package covers parts of Askin, Aston, Riddell, Burnaby, Eldridge, Milne, Flett, Kenny, Gooderham, Gladman, Hartle, Hebert, South Lorrain, La Salle, Mclaren, Sisk, Strathcona and Hammell Townships. Work included in this assessment report occurred on claims in Kenny Township. Tres-Or is 100% owner of the claim.
Portions of the larger property can be accessed by logging roads off of Hwy 11 such as the Bidwell and Rabbit Lake Roads. A significant portion of the property is only accessible by A TV or boat. Access to the Kenny claim is access via a bush road off Hwy 11 immediately north of Marian Lake approximately 2.7 km north of Hwy 64 linking Hwy 11 to Hwy 17 at Warren.
Table 1. Tres-Or Resources Claim Datil
Township Claim Number Recording Date Claim Due Date Work ReqUired
ASKIN
ASKIN
ASKIN
ASKIN
ASKIN
ASKIN
ASKIN
ASKIN
ASKIN
ASKIN
ASKIN
ASTON
BURNABY BURNABY BURNABY BURNABY
1246343
1246348
4206528
4210488
4210489
4210490
4210491
4210492
4210498
4210597
4210598 4213029
1248945
4200248
4200249
4200250
2000-0d:-27
2000-0d:-27
2005-Nov-14
2006-Nov-16
2006-Nov-16
2006-Nov-16
2006-Nov-16
2006-Nov-16
2006-Nov..()8
2006-0ct-13
2006-0ct-13
2006-Sep-01
2001-Dec-04
2005-Sep-13
2005-Sep-13
2005-Sep-13
2007 -Oct-27 $3,200
2007-Oct-27 $5,200
2007-Nov-14 $400
2008-Nov-16 $1,600
2008-Nov-16 $800
2008-Nov-16 $400
2008-Nov-16 $2,400
2006-Nov-16 $3,200
200S-Nov-OS $400
2008-Oct-13 $400
200S-0ct-13 $400
2008-Sep-01 $6,400
2008-Dec-04 $32
2007 -Sep-13 $1,600
2007 -Sep-13 $1,600
2007 -Sep-13 $3,600
6
Township Claim Number Recording Date Claim Due Date Work Required
-------~ - -- ~--------------~-~ BURNABY 4200251
ELDRIDGE 1248906
ELDRIDGE 1248911
ELDRIDGE 1248912
ELDRIDGE 1248914
ELDRIDGE 1248915
ELDRIDGE 4200053
ELDRIDGE 4212202
FLETT 3017607
FLETT 4206603
FLETT 4206604
FLETT 4206605
FLETT 4207132
FLETT 4210500
FLETT 4210501
FLETT 4210502
GLADMAN 4267207
GLADMAN 4207208
GLADMAN 4207209
GLADMAN 4207214
GLADMAN 4207215
GOODERHAM 1245265
GOODERHAM 1245294
GOODERHAM 1245295
GOODERHAM 1245296
GOODERHAM 1245526
GOODERHAM 1246323
GOODERHAM 1246372
GOODERHAM 1246374
GOODERHAM 1246375
GOODERHAM 1246378
GOODERHAM 1248984
GOODERHAM 1248985
GOODERHAM 1248998
GOODERHAM 3008997
GOODERHAM 3015346
GOODERHAM 3015347
GOODERHAM 3015348
GOODERHAM 3017169
GOODERHAM 4200064
GOODERHAM 4201190
GOODERHAM 4201191
GOODERHAM 4201193
GOODERHAM 4201194
2oo5-Sep-13
2001-May-30
2001-Dee-04
2oo1-Dec-04
2001-Dee-04
2oo1-Dee-04
2()04..()ct-21
2oo6-Jul-13
2005-0ct-05
2oo5-0ct-05
2oo5-Oct-05
2005-Oct-05
2oo5-Juf..25
2006-0ct-25
2oo6-Oct-2S
2006-Oct-25
2005-Jun-08
2oo5-JlIn-08
2oo5-Jun-08
2005-Jun-08
2oo5-Jun-08
2001-Apr-17
2001-Apr-17
2oo1-Apr-17
2oo1-Apr-17
2oo3-Sep-02
2000-Oct-16
2000-Nov-02
2ooo-Nov-02
2ooO-Nov-02
2000-Nov-02
2oo1-Apr-17
2001-Apr-17
2001-Apr-17
2005-Sep-16
2OOS-Sep-16
2005-Sep-16
200S-Sep-i6
2oo4-Mar-30
2004-Nov-02
2oo5-Sep-16
2oo5-Sep-16
2oo5-Sep-16
2oo5-Sep-16
2oo7-5ep-13
2007 -May-30
200S-Aug-04
200S-Aug-04
2005-Aug-04
2005-Aug-04
2007-0ct-21
2008-Juf..13
2007 -Oct-OS
2007-0ct-05
2007-act-05
2007 -Od-05
2007-Jul-25
2oo8-Oct-25
2oo8-0ct-25
2oo8-0ct-25
2oo7-Jun-08
2007 -JlIn-08
2007-Jun-OS
2007 -Jun-08
2007 -Jun-08
2007-Apr-17
2oo7-Apr-17
2oo7-Apr-17
2007-Apr-17
2007 -Sep-02
2007-Oct-16
2007 -Nov-02
2007 -Nov-02
2007-Nov-02
2007-Nov-02
2oo7-Apr-17
2oo7-Apr-17
2oo7-Apr-17
2007·Sep·15
2007 -Sep-16
2007 -Sep-16
2007-Sep-16
2007 -Mar-30
2007-Nov-02
Z007-Sep-i5
2007 -Sep-16
2007 -Sep-i6
2oo7-Sep-16
$400
$4,716
$6,400
$5,200
$6,400
$1,600
$800
$1,600
$3.600
$1,600
$1,600
$1,500
$1,200
$3,600
$400
$800
$3,200
$3,200
$3,200
$3,200
$3,200
$6,000
$5,600
$6,400
$5,600
$3,200
$6,400
$6,400
$4,000
$800
$3,200
$6.400
$6,400
$5,200
$6,400
$4,800
$6,400
$6,400
$6,400
$2,400
$4,800
$6,400
$2,400
$6,400
7
Township Claim Number Recording Date Claim Due Date Work Required
- --- --- . --~- ~ ---- - - - ---- - -- ~-- _. - -~- - -- ~ ~- - ~ - -- ---~-.--- ---~--GOODERHAM GOODERHAM GOODERHAM GOODERHAM GOODERHAM GOODERHAM GOODERHAM GOODERHAM GOODERHAM GOODERHAM GOODERHAM GOODERHAM GOODERHAM GOODERHAM HAMMEll HAMMELL HAMMELL HAMMEll HAMMEll HAMMELL HAMMEll HAMMELL HAMMEll HAMMEll HAMMELL HAMMEll HAMMEll HAMMEll HAMMELL HARTLE HARTLE HARTLE HEBERT HEBERT HEBERT HEBERT HEBERT HEBERT HEBERT HEBERT HEBERT HEBERT HEBERT HEBERT
4201195
4201196
4201197
4201198
4205041
4205047
4205048
4205049
4205001
4206598
4200599
4206600
4210522
4210531
1245525 3005234
3005553
4203192
4203197
4203198
4210515
4210523
4210525
4210725
4210726
4210727
4210728
4210729
4212307
3005173
4207139
4207140
1248917
1248918
1248919
1248920
1248921
1248922 1248923
1248924
1248925
1248926
1248927
1248928
2oo5-Sep-16
2005-5ep-16
2005-5ep-16
2OO5-Sep-16
2005-Sap-16
2oo5-Sep-16
2OO5-5ep-16
2oo5-Sep-16
2005-Sep-16
2005-0ct-04
2005-Oct-04
2005-0ct-04
2007-Mar-21
2007 -Mar-20
2003-Sep-02
2004-Dec-06
2oo7-Mar-23
2004-Dec-16
2004-Dec-16
2004-Dec-16
2007-Mar-23
2007-Mar-20
2oo7-Mar-21
2oo7-Mar-23
2007-Mar-23
2007-Mar-23
2007 -Mar-23
2oo7-Mar-23
2006-Aug-03
2oo3-May-22
2oo5-Aug-25
2oo5-5ep-14
2ool-Dec-04
2001-Dec-04
2001-Dec-04
2001-Dec-04
2001-Dec-04
2001-Dec-04
2oo1-Dec-04
200l-Dec-04
2oo1-Dec-04
2oo1-Dec-04
2001-Dec-04
2001-Dec-04
2oo7-5ep-16 $3,600
2oo7-Sep-16 $2,400
2oo7-Sep-16 $6,400
2007-Sep-16 $2,400
2007 -Sep-16 $4,800
2007 -Sep-16 $4,000
2007-Sep-16 $6,400
2007 -Sep-16 $3,200
2oo7-Sep-16 $3,200
2007 -Oct-04 $3,200
2007 -Oct-04 $6,000
2oo7-Oct-04 $4,800
2009-Mar-21 $6,400
2009-Mar-20 $2,400
2007 -Sep-02 $3,200
2oo7-Dec-06 $1,200
2009-Mar-23 $6,400
2007 -Dec-16 $5,200
2oo7-Dec-16 $2,400
2007 -Dec-16 $2,400
2OO9-Mar-23 $6,400
2oo9-Mar-20 $6,400
2oo9-Mar-21 $6,400
2009-Mar-23 $6,400
2009-Mar-23 $6,400
2oo9-Mar-23 $6,400
2009-Mar-23 $2,400
2009-Mar-23 $3,200
2oo8-Aug-03 $1,200
2007 -May-22 $4,714
2oo7-Aug-25 $6,400
2007-Sep-14 $6,400
2oo5-Aug-04 $4,800
2oo5-Aug-04 $6,400
2005-Aug-04 $6,400
2005-Aug-04 $4,000
2005-Aug-04 $6,400
2005-Aug-04 $1,600
2005-Aug-04 $6,400
2005-Aug-04 $6,400
2oo5-Aug-04 $4,000
2oo5-Aug-04 $5,600
2oo5-Aug-04 $6,400
2005-Aug-04 $6,400
8
Township Claim Number Recording Date Claim Due Date Work Required
-----~ ~-----~---- ~.-~~--~ ~--~- -~-~- --- ---" -~ --~~~-~--~--HEBERT
KENNY
KENNY
KENNY
KENNY
KENNY
KENNY
KENNY
KENNY
KENNY
LASALLE
MCLAREN
MILNE
MILNE
MILNE
MILNE
MILNE
MILNE
MILNE
MILNE
MILNE
MILNE
MILNE
MILNE
MILNE
MILNE
MILNE
RIDDELL
RIDDELL
RIDDELL
RIDDELL
STRATHCONA STRATHCONA STRATHCONA STRATHCONA STRATHCONA STRATHCONA STRATHCONA
1248929
1245205
3016942
3017601
4206524
4206525
4206596
4206597
421Q503
4210514
4206511
1076581 3014441
3015339
301534Q 3015341
3015342
3015343
3015344
3015345
3016024
3017602
3017603
3017604
3017605
3017606
3017623
1248908
4200051
4201119
4210480
3016543
4210481
4210482
4210483
4210481
4210494
4210534
2oo1-Deo-04
2ooi-Apr-17
2003-Oct-29
2oo5-Oct-05
2oo5-Nov-14
2005-Nov-14
2005-Oct-04
2oo5-Oct-04
2006-Oct-25
2oo7-Mar-Oi
2005-Jun-16
2002-Mar-08
2oo5-Oct-OS
2oo5-Sep-1S
2005-Sap-iS
2ooS-Sep-16
2oo5-5ep-16
2oo5-Sep-16
2oo5-5ep-16
2005-Sep-i6
2oo3-Oct-29
2oo5-0ct-05
2oo5-oct-05
2005-Oct-05
2oo5-Oct-Q5
2oo5-Oct-Q5
2005-Oct-05
2001-May-30
2004-0ct-15
2006-Jun-08
2007-Jan-31
2006-Jan-23
2007-Jan-31
2007-Jan-31
2007-Jan-31
2007-Jan-31
2oo7-Jan-31
2007-Jan-31
2oo5-Aug-04 $4,800
2007-Apr-17 $4,800
2007-Oct-29 $3,600
2007-0ct-05 $1,600
2007-Nov-14 $1,200
2007 -Nov-14 $400
2007 -Oct-04 $3,200
2007 -Oct-04 $2,400
2008-0ct-25 $400
2oo9-Mar-01 $4,800
2oo7-Jun-16 $400
200S-Mar-OS $4,790
2oo7-Oct-OS $400
2oo7-Sep-1S $3,200
2007-Sep-iS $2,400
2007-Sep-16 $2,400
2oo7-Sep-16 $3,600
2007-Sep-16 $800
2007 -Sep-i6 $2,400
2007-Sep-iS $3,200
2007 -Oct-29 $800
2007 -Oct-05 $1,600
2oo7-Oct-05 $1,600
2oo7-Oct-05 $2,400
2007-0ct-05 $1,200
2007 -Oct-OS $6,400
2007-0ct-05 $400
2007 -May-30 $5,600
2007-oct-15 $4,800
200B-Jun-08 $1,600
2009-Jan-31 $4,400
2008-Jao-23 $3,600
2oo9-Jan-31 $6,400
2009-Jan-31 $3,600
2009-Jan-31 $3,200
2009-4an-31 $2,000
2oo9-4an-31 $5,200
2009-Jan-31 $2,000
9
PREVIOUS WORK Kenny Township has been covered when Goldak Exploration completed a
high-resolution, airborne three-axis magnetic gradiometer survey over much of Tres-Or Resources Ltd's Temagami claim package during May of 2002. Since then Kenny Twp has had mag and HLEM surveys completed over several targets. Prospecting and mapping were able to explain several of the magnetic targets except for the KE-11 immediately east of Marian Lake and KE-Ol on Conross Lake. Prospecting over the Conross Lake target was performed in 2003 along with a ground mag survey. Diamond drilling 399m in three holes in target KE-l1 was completed in March 2007 along with an infill ground magnetic survey on a second target (KE-01) on Conross Lake.
Prospecting and exploration in the area is sporadic and recently, is primarily for kimberlite. In the 1950's, when Titan Iron Ore company was exploring for iron ore in Angus and Flett Townships, adjacent areas within the Grenville geological Province saw activity. In the late 19905 and early 20005, exploration was heavy along the Grenville Front and south in a northeasterly trend searching for Cu-Ni-PGEs after the significant finds in the River Valley area to the west.
Kimberlite exploration in the area began with the intersection of thin kimberlite dykes in drill holes as early as 1948 in Michaud Township, and in 1968 in the Kirkland Lake area. Falconbridge and Monopros led diamond exploration programs in the late 1970s and 1980s, which resulted in discovery of many of the Kirkland Lake and New Liskeard area pipes.
A compilation of government mapping was completed by Lumbers, 1971 and was published by the OGS as a preliminary map.
A regional stream sample study covering the Temagami Marten River area by the Ontario Geological Survey (OGS) recovered kimberlite indicator minerals suggestive of derivation from diamondiferous mantle, and concluded that the area had good potential to host diamond-bearing kimberlites (Allan, 2001). The Cr-pyrope chemistry reported from this study includes distinctly more sub-calcic grains (GI0s) than known pipes in the New Liskeard kimberlite field to the north. A second OGS kimberlite indicator mineral study extended sample coverage east to the Montreal River, and again recovered grains suggesting potential of the area to host diamond-bearing kimberlite (Reid, 2002).
10
ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY
Tres-Or's Temagami Diamond Property extends from 15 kIn south of Marten River, to north of the village of Temagami and east from Highway 11 to the Ontario-Quebec border (Figure 1). The property is about 50 kIn north of North Bay, Ontario on Highway 11, which crosses the western side of the property. Marten River, Temagami and New Liskeard (50 kIn to the north), in addition to other towns in the vicinity can provide the required personnel and infrastructure to support exploration. A network of logging roads, east from Highway 11, access the properties, as does the Ontario Northland Railway, which crosses southeasterly through the center of the property. An interconnected system of lakes provides boat access to many parts of the property and the larger lakes can be accessed by floatplanes.
The Temagami-Marten River area of eastern Ontario is characterized by rolling hills separated by lakes and swampy lowlands, with elevation ranging from 350 to 450 m. The area is forested partly with hardwoods, and partly with conifers.
Summer field conditions extend from June through early October. Winters are cold, but suitable for exploration operations such as drilling and geophysical surveys. Break-up in the spring and freeze-up in the fall limit access to the area. The climate features intermittently cold winters (-40°C to + 10°C) and mild summers, although temperatures can reach +30°C for short periods. Snow depths commonly reach 1 to 1.5 m depth, and summer rains average 3 to 5 cm per month.
11
WORK PROGRAM SUMMARY
KE·11 Diamond Drill Sampling
Drilling commenced on March 15th, 2007 and was completed on March 23rd
,
2007. George Downing Estate Drilling Limited of Grenville-sur-la-Rouge, Quebec was contracted to perform the diamond drilling using a LF70 drill rig. The drill program consisted of 3 NQ size drill holes totaling 399 m. 17 samples were taken for base and precious metal assay using ICP, three samples were sent for wholerock analysis - all to Swastika Laboratories in Swastika, Ontario.
Splitting was done using a manual wheel-type core splitter. The core was split in half with one half sent to Swastika Laboratories and one half returned to the core box. The sample collection data and results are included in Appendix I at the end of the report along with the Laboratory specification and procedural information.
Three samples were sent for wholerock analysis. These samples were sent by Swastika Laboratories to Assayers Canada in Vancouver, B.C for analysis. Two were ultramafic intrusive units. The third was mafic but not decidedly intrusive. The analysis in included as well in Appendix 1. Rock classification was determined roughly using AGI Data Sheet 44.1-4: Chemical Analyses of Common Rock Types (compiled by J.F. Karlo).
Table 2. Wholerock Analysis Samples
Sample Hole Description Identification
31746 TEM07-01 massive mafic gabbroic unit !gabbro 31759 TEM07-03 medium green-grey, coarse grained, pyroxenite + biotite !peridotite
31760 TEM07-02 Ipale green-grey, coarse grained, pyroxenite Ipyroxenite
Table 3. Drill Hole Data
TWP Target ID Date Project Claim UTM-E UTM-N Az Dip Length Size Kenny KE-11 ITEM07-01 Mar-07 TEM-TRS 3016042 595846 5180471 180 -60 152 NO Kenny KE-11 IrEM07-02 Mar-07 TEM-TRS 3016042 595921 5180464 135 -50 152 NO Kenny KE-11 TEM07-03 Mar-07 rEM-TRS 3016042 595708 5180391 180 -50 95 NO
12
PROPERTY GEOLOGY
Lithologies
Lithological units encountered during the drill program are as follows:
Quartz-Feldspar-Biotite Gneiss
Medium grey to beige, fine to medium-grained, well developed dark green to black banding on the centimetre scale, primarily composed of up to 75% quartz, 10-15% biotite and 5-10% feldspar and trace pyrite. The lithology exhibits well developed compositional banding composed of biotite and minor hornblende and varies from 2 to 100 mm in width locally exhibiting offsets and boudinage features. Frequency of banding is highly variable.
Mafic Units
Black-green, massive to weakly foliated, fme-grained, moderately to poorly magnetic with no detectable carbonate with variable amounts of sulphides from trace to 5%. Dominantly biotite with hornblende. Locally gabbroic texture noted.
Ultramafic Units
Generally massive, coarse-grained grading to finer grained towards the contacts. Minor but consistent weak interstitial carbonate which reacts very weakly to 10% HCI. Weakly and variably magnetic. Grains are pale green-grey to a darker grey -pyroxene. Minimal quartz, minor biotite and minor olivine.
DRILL LOG SUMMARIES
TEM07-01:
Quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss with trace to minor disseminated sulphides with some amphibolite bands. Thin seam of light beige coloured, clay-like material2-3mm thick, reacts moderately to 10% HCI cutting foliation @ 20° to core axis. Mafic dyke (?) from 33.3 - 50.8m, weakly to moderately magnetic. Back into Q-F-B gneiss with -2m section at 119.7 where more massive and elevated sulphides (up to 10%) and weakly magnetic with some hematite staining.
TEM07-02:
13
Quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss with trace to minor disseminated sulphides with some amphibolite bands. Mafic dyke at 129.3-132.2 fine-grained high biotite and moderately magnetic near top reduced to non-magnetic near bottom; no sulphides; Contacts sharp and parallel to foliation - possibly not intrusive. A pale greenish grey unit (pyroxenite ?) becomes evident by - 135m, grading from a coarse porphyroblastic rock at 133.6. Greenish unit is weakly reactive to 10% HCl. Hole ends in thinly banded quartzfeldspar-biotite gneiss. Sulphide concentration reaches up to - 10% locally with corresponding high values of magnetic susceptibility.
TEM07-03:
Quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss with minor disseminated sulphides and low magnetic susceptibility readings except over a pyroxenite unit at 68.2m. Pyroxenite is a coarsegrained, weakly magnetic pale greenish grey unit with sharp very, biotite-rich contacts. Mildly reactive to 10% HCI. Hole ends in quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss.
14
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Values associated with the sampling from drilling east of Marian Lake in Kenny Twp were rather insignificant. The drill targets were explained by moderately to strongly magnetic units. Due to significant platinum group mineralization associated with gabbros in the band stretching from the River Valley area east-northeastwards across to Quebec, areas of mineralized gabbros were sampled along with other anomalous mineralization. Copper and nickel values were higher where sulphides were more noteable but no significant values were obtained - the highest value of copper being just below 0.1 % (989 ppm) corresponding with the highest nickel value at 0.04 % (387 ppm). All Pt-Pd values tested were below 5ppb and the only gold value registered at 7ppb.
Fences of till sampling is recommended in the area - particularly prior to planned drilling to the south on Conross Lake.
EXPLORATION ACTIVITY cost/unit
Follow-up till sampling: 20 samples (processing) $350/sample $ 7,000
Field labour and supervision -10 days $500fda~ $ 5,000
Field logistic suPPOrt (truck rental, fuel, accommodations, food, MOB etc] 10 days $600/da~ $ 6,000
!Geomatics support - 2 day $4OO1da~ $80e
Communications $ 30C
~hipping $200
~eporting $ 2,OQI:
Contingency 20% $ 3,90C
iTOTAL $ 23,400
15
LIST OF PERSONNEL
Elaine Basa, P.Geo. - core processing/reporting Grupo Moje limited Box 847 Haileybury, ON POJ 1KO (705) 672-3551
Martin Ethier, M.Sc. - interpretation Hinterland Geoscience and Geomatics P.O Box 304 Haileybury, ON POJ 1 KO (705) 672-5814
Joey Ethier - splitting/labour P.O. Box 59 North Cobalt, ON POJ 1 RO (705) 676-6417
16
REFERENCES
American Geological Institute Data Sheets for Geology in the Field, laboratory, and Office, 1985. Compiled by R.V. Dietrich, J.T. Dutro, Jr., R.M. Foose. American Geological Institute
Allan, S.E., 2001. Regional modern Alluvium Sampling of the Temagami-Marten River Area, Northeastern Ontario. Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6043, 194 p.
Card, K. D., lumbers, S. B., 1974-75. Map 2361: Sudbury-Cobalt, Ontario Geological Survey
lumbers, S.B., 1971. Geology of the Tomiko Area (West Half). Ontario Department of Mines and Northern Affairs, Geological Series, Preliminary Map P.678.
Geological Survey of Canada Website: http://gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/diamonds/kirkland/diamond e.php
Tres-Or Resources website: http://www.tres-or.com/
17
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION - Elaine Basa
To accompany the report on Sampling of Diamond Drilling Core from Kenny Township, Sudbury Mining District for Tres-Or Resources Ltd., June, 2007.
I, Elaine Ba.sa, of the city of Temiskaming Shores, in the Province of Ontario, Canada, hereby certify as follows concerning my report on the Tres-Or Resources Ltd.' s Temagami area property, Ontario, 2007:
1. I graduated from Carleton University in 1985 with a degree of Bachelor of Science, Honours Geology.
2. I am a Professional Geologist and a member of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (member number 0895).
3. I have worked continuously in the mining industry for the past 18 years. 4. I am acting as a consulting geologist for Tres-Or Resources Ltd. 5. The attached report is a product of:
a) data provided to me by the property owner b) reports identified in the reference section of this report c) analytical results from accredited labs d) inspection and analysis of drill core associated with this property
Dated this 15th day of June 2007 in Temiskaming Shores, Ontario
Elaine Ba.sa, P.Geo.
STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATION - Martin Ethier
1. To accompany the Drill Core Sampling report in Kenny Twp, Sudbury Mining District for Tres-Or Resources Ltd, June, 2007
2. I, Martin Ethier, of the city of Temiskaming Shores, in the Province of Ontario, Canada, hereby certify as follows concerning my report on the Tres-Or Resources Ltd.'s Martin River Area property, Ontario, 2007:
3. I graduated a Bachelor of Arts, from Mount Allison University in Sackville New Brunswick (1997), majoring in Geography, and minors in Geology as well as Environmental Studies. In addition, I completed an intensive Post Graduate Advanced Diploma in Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems from the Centre of Geographic Sciences (COGS) in Lawrencetown (1998), Nova Scotia. Furthermore have obtained a Master s of Science in Geology from Acadia University in Wolfville (2001), Nova Scotia.
4. I am currently employed as a consulting geologist providing my services through:
Hinterland Geoscience & Geomatics 620 Brewster Street, P.o. Box 304 Haileybury, Ontario POJ 1 KO (705) 672-5814
5. The attached report is a product of: • data provided to me by the property owner • reports identified in the reference section of this report • local knowledge and experience
Dated this 13th day of June 2007 in Temiskaming Shores, Ontario
Martin Ethier M.Sc.
19
APPENDICES
Appendix I
Analytical Assay Sheets and Procedural Infonnation Sheets from Swastika Laboratories and Assayers Canada
20
APPENDIX 1 - Analvtical Assav Sheets
21
Sample # Date
Hole # Meterage Meterage Interval
Description assays Sampled from (m) to(m) (m)
Cu Ni Pt Pd Au Pb Zn (ppm) (ppm) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppm) (ppm)
weakly magnetic; foliated 40· to CA; QFB gneiss; -5% 31741 17-Mar-07 TEM07-01 20.27 20.42 0.15 Py+Po 81 47
moderately magnetic: banded QFB gneiss; - 5% sulphides 31742 17-Mar-07 TEM07-01 24.00 24.32 0.32 fPy+Po+?) I 289 79 27 60
weakly magnetic: foliated 40· to CA; QFB gneiss; -5% 31743 17-Mar-07 TEM07-01 24.32 24.46 0.1~e 257 105 109 305
kly magnetic: foliated 40' to CA; QFB gneiss; -5% 31744 17-Mar-07 TEM07-01 26.65 26.97 0.32 Py+Po 41 69 26 101
~eratelY magnetic; foliated 40' to CA; QFB gneiss; 5-6% 31745 17-Mar-07 TEM07-01 26.97 27.16 0.19 hides 90 71 24 88
massive-weakly foliated mafic gabbroic unit; weakly 31747 21-Mar-07 TEM07-01 119.71 120.05 0.34 magnetic; disseminated sulphides + minor hematite 103 57 <5 <5 7 113
massive-weakly foliated mafic gabbroic unit; weakly 31748 21-Mar-07 TEM07-01 120.05 120.36 0.31 magnetic; disseminated sulphides + minor hematite 82 64 102
massive-weakly foliated mafic gabbroic unit; weakly 31749 21-Mar-07 TEM07-01 120.36 120.71 0.35 magnetic; disseminated sulphides + minor hematite 91 66 95
massive-weakly foliated mafic gabbroic unit; weakly 31750 21-Mar-07 TEM07-01 120.71 120.99 0.28 magnetic; disseminated sulphides + minor hematite 150 80 116
massive-weakly foliated mafic gabbroic unit: weakly 31751 21-Mar-07 TEM07-01 120.99 121.34 0.35 magnetic; disseminated sulphides + minor hematite 162 49 117
massive-weakly foliated mafic gabbroic unit; weakly magnetic; disseminated sulphides + minor hematite (lower
31752 21-Mar-07 TEM07-01 121.34 121.61 0.27 contact) 114 64 <5 <5 nil 127 I Ul"ts gneiss WIUl gaoorolC Danos Wlm - 1 U'ro Interstitial
31753 21-Mar-07 TEM07-01 134.48 134.74 0.26 sulphides 128 48 74
31764 24-Mar-07 TEM07-02 99.13 99.50 0.37 finely banded QFB gneiss; moderately magnetic; - 10% Po 315 52 <5 <5 finely banded QFB gneiss; weakly to moderately magnetic;
31755 24-Mar-07 TEM07-02 99.78 99.99 0.21 <5% Po 139 38 <5 <5
31156 24-Mar-07 TEM07-02 103.03 103.23 0.20 finely banded QFB gneiss; -10% interstitial sulphides (Cp-LPy-Po) with v.fine stringers 989 387 <5 <5 finely banded QFB gneiss; high mag. Susceptibility (222); v.little sulphides noted + dark brown-black
31757 24-Mar-07 TEM07-02 103.69 104.00 0.31 mineral(magnetite ) 256 73 <5 <5 Innely oanaea UFt! gneiss; ntgn mag. ~uscepbOlllty (:516);
31758 24-Mar-07 TEM07-02 104.12 104.40 0.28 sulphides in thin seams 377 93 <5 <5
Geochemical Analysis Certificate
Company: TRES-OR RESOURCES LTD Project: Attn: E. Rasa
We hereby certify the following Geochemical Analysis of 12 Core samples submitted APR -09-07 by .
Sample Number
3~74~
3~742
31743 31744 31745
31.747 31.748 31749 31750 31.751
31752 31753 31754 31755 31756
31757 3175B
Au PPB
Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
7
Nil
eu PPM
8~
289 257
41 90
103 82 91
150 162
114 128 375
139 989
Ni PPM
47 79
105 69 71
57 64 66 SO 49
54 48 52 38
397 ----------- ---256 73 377 93
Pb
PPM
27 109
26 24
Zn PPM
60 305 101
BB
113 102
95 116 117
127 74
f,'
" /
7W-1324-RGl
Date: MAY -07 -08
Pt PPB
<5
<5
Pd PPB
<5
<5
<5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
<5 <5 <5 <5
Sample # Date
Hole # Meterage Meterage Interval Description SiOz A~03 Fez0 3 MgO CaO Na;;O KzO Ti02 P20S MnO Cr203 BaO LOI
Sampled from (m) to (m) (m) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) ("!o) (%) rAt) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%j C{%) S("!o} SUM(%) 31746 21-Mar-07 TEM07-01 98.69 98.84 0.15 massive mafic gabbrolc unit 48,090 15,560 9.490 8,870 12,160 2.27 0.49 0.53 0.04 0.16 0,08 0.01 1.65 0,14 0.04 99.410
pale green-grey, coarse 31760 24-Mli1r-07 TEM07-02 135.99 136.21 0.22 Igrained. pyroxenite 50,790 4.310 7,410 17,610 15.330 0,22 1.37 0.47 0,1 0,13 0,2 0,04 1.98 0.14 0.03 99.980
medium green-grey, coarse 31759 28-Mar-07 TEM07·03 69,39 69.75 0,36 Igrained, pyroxenite + biotite 45.960 0,690 10.110 26,580 5,830 <0,01 0.09 0,07 0.02 0.19 0,35 <0.01 8.85 1,67 0.32 98.470
TRES-OR RESOURCES LTD t\ ttention: E. Rasa
I'n~iect:
Sample type:
Sample Si02 AI,O, Fe-,O, caO Number % % % %
31746 46.09 15.56 9.49 12.16
31759 45.96 0.69 10.11 5.83 31760 50.79 4.31 7.41 lS.33
These elements are not included in the total column: C, S
Sample is fused with lithium metaborate and dissolved in dilute HCUHN03.
MgO %
8.87
26.58
17.61
Assayers Canada H2H2 Shcrbrookc St.. Vancouver. B.C.. V5X 41{6
Tel: (604) 327-3436 Fax: (604) 327-3423
ICP-AES Whole Rock Assay l,ithium Mctahorate Fusion
Na20 K,O TiOl P,O; % % % %
2.27 0.49 0.53 0.04
<0.01 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.22 1.37 0.47 0.10
Page 1 of1
MnO %
0.16
0.19
0.13
sao Cr,03 LOI % % %
0.01 0.08 1.65
<0.01 0.35 8.85
0.04 0.20 1.98
/
Report No
Date
Total %
99.41
98,47
99.98
C %
0.14
1.67
0.14
7WIJ25RL
t\ pr-2()-07
S %
0.04
0.32
0.03
Signed: ----,.:.-1' ;:......,l_:..... (""·~.<"--.... L...--)"..::...~---) I ,,/
i
I AGI
DATA SHEETS
FOR GEOLOGY IN THE FIELD, LABORATORY, AND OFFICE
Complied by
R.V. Dietrich J.T. Dutro, Jr.
R.M. Foose
'~ AMERICAN OEOLOOICAL ~: ... :) INSTITUTE
\
':
'1
I
I
AGI DATA SHEET 44.1
Chemical Anal~l!!$ of.C.<!.~rnon Rock TJ'ees ':lomp/led by Joh" F. Karlo, 511&11 011 Co.
IGNEOUS ROCKS
! l .. ~I' ~t J 1 u t
I t
--.----".~-~~ -------"-------91°2 412°3 Fa20s FoO MgO COO Naze 1(20 H20 + H20-
TI02 "2°5 MnO CO2
5102 AI203
F"2°3 FeO MgO CaO
Na20 K20 i 20+
H20-
TI02 "20 S MnO 002
73.116
13.75
0,78
1.13
0,26
0.12 351 5.13 041
I
0.20
0.1' 005
66.66
15.66
1,33
259 1.57 3.56
:l84 307
0.~5
0.57 0.21 0,07
74,57 12.58
1.30 1,02
0.11 0,61
4,13
4.73
0,116
0.11 0,07
0,05
72.08 13.116
0.116
\.61 0.52 1.33
3.08 5.46
0,53
0.37 0.18 0.06
67.38 66,27
15,25 15.39 1.17 2.14
23\ 2.23 0.96 1.57
2.02 3.68 2.80 4 13
5,53 301
0.57 0.88 Q,12 ,
0.66 0.66 0,28 011 0.042 O.Q7
0.15
72.64 14.04
0.87 OJI6
0.38
1.39 3.32 5.48 0,34
0.66
0.26 0.09 0.03 0.07
00.15
15.56
1.36
3.42 194 4.65 3.00 142 0.69
062 0.21 0.08
6911 ,3,116
15.40 13.45
1,08 1.25
1.45 0.75 0.76 0.32
1.94 1.13 4.07 2.96 4.5\ 5.3!i
0.55 0.78 0.11 I
0.50 0.22 0.14 0,07 0.034 0.1)3 0.08
61,86
16,91
2,32 2,63
0.96 2,S. 5.46
5,91
0.53
0..58 0.,19 0.11
0.73
0.18
0.13
"lgnfXID& rock names iollow iUGS nomonctaturf}" ~ ~ Entries to IlaUos af~ International QCochenucal roc,", "slaoOO:t(JK"
Fun trace &leffiEHlt liMa ate availab~-see referenCe!L
73,43
13.74
048
1,23 0.29 1.17
4.18 434
0.34
0.12 0.27 0.05 004
0.01
10.15 others)
59.41
17,12
2.19
283 2.G2 4.06
3.92
6,53
0.63
0.83
0.3.8 0.06
58.31
18.05
2,54
2,02 2.01 4.25 3.65 7.38 053
I
0.66
0.20 0.14
SlO:I ~ F":iOa F.o MUO CeO N.:zO K20 ¥~
112°nOa P~5 NnO C02
1 ~ JI 6§ I ~ t t d II tl 11 --- .-----~
55.36 18.5$ 2,57 4,5$
3.67 6.16 3.51 4.66 O.1lO
I
1,12
6."'1 0..13
/
i t
5<1.62 11.22
:1II3 3.16 3.ar 6,76
3.32 US 0.78
1.18 0.49 0.12
56.45 lM5 3.34 3.99 2.51 5.55 3.47 4.111 0.43
1,40 0.43 0.09
65.93 111.35 6.99
2,98
j,l)S
3,21 4.28 3,61 6;21
6,19
6,61
6.25 0.09 0.61
10.04 olher.1
114.66 16,16 3.26 5,36
3.9S 8,99 3.78 2.78 6.60
/
100
0.43 0..14
I
00.00 16.81 3.14 4.36 3.39 6.87 3.00 2.110 0.92
I
1.119 0..33 0,13
Jil, 51.66 5Vl5 15.40 17.42 2.73 3.1111 6.91 5.42 6.12 4.110 8.40 7.08 U8 3.00\ 1.33 1.76 0.80 2.09
I 0.23 1.50 1.11 0.,35 0.21
0..18 0..21 I 0.13
----~.
5102 A'2°3 Ft20a FeO MOO CeO N.:zO K:zO H:zO+ H:zOT102
P~5 MnO
CO2
5·4.20 1111 3.<ll 5.~9
4.36
7.92 3.67 1.11
DJl!!
1.31
6.$ 6.15
59.00 lr.25 4.51 2.05 1.53 4.00 4.26
2.69 0.61 6.16
1.6.
0..49 6.097 6.00
48.38 18.81 2.55 7.92 8.00
11.67
2,28 0.56 6,64
1,32
0.,24 0.18
52,84 15.00
lAO 8,72 6.82
16,98
2.15 6.84 0.53 6.16
1.07 6.14 6.17
6.00
110.83 14.0.7 2,88 9,00 8,34
10.42 2,23 6.62 6.91
I
2.00 6.23 0..18
84.50 49.8 13.81 14.0 a,66 2.5 8.110 a,5 3,48 7.2 8,92 11,3 3.27 2.2 1.70 0.,62 6,77 0.25 0..110 QOO
2.20 2.6 /136 0.32
6.18 0.18 0.03 <6.05
45.18 14,84 ( 3.15 8.73
9.39 10..74 2.53 0..95 0.76 i
I
2.83 0..39 0,20
510:1 AlaC; F-2oa FoO
MyC c.o HazO
1\2° H20 '" 112°-11°2 P20S MoO
C02
5102 AI20, FoaOa FoO M1IO caO Na20
K20 H20'" H20-
n02 P20. MnO CO2
I t
>026 11.67 I.X T.4tl
927 9.72 1.96
063 047
6.89
021 0,;4
I
55.38 21.30
2.42 2.00 0.57
1.98 B .... 5.34 0..95
I
0.00 0.19
019
0.17
54 5' ;1512
0.63
'46 063 9.62 4,66
108 0..63
/
0.52
011 0..02
59,54
18.61 2.B7 2.00 0.10 1.15 6.97 4.24
139 0.19
0.13
0.16
Co23
001 {O 1 other~J
.. I f
5C,5Q
•. 10 2.44 1,37
21.71
12.00
0.45
0.21
OA7
0.53
000 0./3
56W 20.17 2.26 1.85
0.56
1.88 8.12 5.42
095 I
0.59 o.t? 0,i9
43.54
),99
251 9.84
34.02
346 056 0.25
0.76
081
OJ)" 021
46.8B
17,01 362
59' 4.85
949 ;',09
2.64
097
2B1
048
016
(036 olt'!ers)
41.'>:)
G,74
2.85
5.24 43,18
0..51
0.000 O.(Xll.
4,70
050
0.015
0,002 o l~l 0.12
44,82
1f),42
4028 6.6' 7.27
16.32
5.30 1:>6 1 ~6
Z,6!::
0.35
016
461 DATA SHEET 443
40.50
G.;?4
121
7.73 49,00
(l15
0.e107 0.0012
046 0.06
0013
0.002
0.11
000
.17.05
16,05 349
5.78
6.20
1080 2,35
b<~U
DHf)
154
U,!Y~
0.17
>., 1.52
020
Swastika Laboratories Established 1928
Assaying .. Consulting .. HCllrcscnlation
ROUTINE SAMPLE PREPARATION
1) Dry samples if required.
2) Crush total sample to 1/2 inch (Jaw Crusher)
3} Crush total sample to 10 mesh (Rolls Crusher)
4) SPli~ Approximately 350 grams using a Jones riffle.
5) The remaining reject is placed in a plastic bag, and packed in
cartons with sample numbers listed on the outside.
6) Pulverize the 3509 sample
7) Homogenize the pulp, it is then ready for assay.
Sample preparation quality is assured by regular inspection,
maintenance of crushing equipment, training and supervision of our
staff to ensure that proper technique is utilized.
We prepare and analyze second pulps from stored rejects. The
resulting data is compared with original results to verify sample
sequence and also that repeatability is within acceptable limits.
To ensure that there is no dilution or concentration of various
minerals, dust loss is kept at a minimum. For the critical pulverizi
step, we have equipped our pulverizers with automatic draft shut off
damper to eliminate sample pulp loss.
To prevent cross contamination, we use compressed air jets to
clean the equipment between samples. The rolls crusher is cleaned
using a wire brush combined with air jets. this system does a
thorough cleaning. Also barren abrasive material is crushed between
h~tches as an extra orecaution.
Swastika Laboratories Established 1928
Assaying . Consulting . Representation
GOLD BY FIRE ~SSAY General Description~
Both gold assay and geochemical gold analysis begin with a
fusion using a flux mixture of litharge (PbOl)i sodium carbonal.e,
borax, silica, fluorspar with further oxidants (nitre) or
reductants (flour) added as required. The relative concentrations
of the fluxing materials are adjusted to suit the type of sample
being analyzed. An aliquot of silver is added as a final collection
agent. The resultant lead button containing the precious metals is
reduced to Pb0 2 and absorbed into a cupel in a cupellation furnace.
The precious metals collected in the silver aliquot are now ready
for either geochemical analysis using an atomic absorption
spectrometer or a gravimetric assay finish. The geochemical meth0d
involves dissolving the precious metal and analyzing by atomic
absorption. Gravimetric assays are completed by dissal ving the
silver of the dore bead in nitric acid and leaving the gold to be
weighed on a micro balance.
When geochemical beads are visually estimated to be 1500 ppb
or more, we have the option of retrieving and weighing them. This
option has been quite useful in getting the best of both methods.
Quality control consists of using inhouse or Canmet standards I
blanks and by reassaying at least 10% of all samples. The
supervisor may also have additional pulps prepared from stored
reject and assayed. All data is evaluated by the fire assay
supervisor and additional checks may be run on anomalous values.
All values obtained are reported.
1 Cameron Ave., P.O. Box 10, Swastika, Ontario POK ITO Telephone (705)642-3244 Fax (705)642-3300
CCRMP
Proficiency Testing Pn)grarn for Minerai Laboratories
Certifica of Laboratory Pro el/
Swastika Laboratories, Custom Labo ry
Onta c
,1'
Prograrn Year ~: 5
Platinwn
L Nickel A)i)al
Ily PTP·/vll).J.
tile fask Accwditat!or,
" Swastika Laboratories A Dl""'Dft Dr Allayen Corpor.llon Ll.d.
Assaying· Consulting - Representation
GOLD. PLATINUM AND PALLADIUM ANALYSIS
Tho same Iype of fusjon and cupellalion process Is used for Platinum and palladium as is used in gold assaying.
The resulUng bead Is dissolved using nitric and hydJOChlotic acids and is determined by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry.
Blanks, standardS and dupUcales are Included In evety batCh.
Assay(30g) G80Chem (150)
gelm;lIon UmtL (Pp&) Au rt ell 2 < ( 3 10 S
Threshold
2QOOOPPB 20000PPB
We have found that samples conlainlng high sulphides and _pedally high nickel cause lower recovery of Pl and Pd during the 'uslon and cupellation process. We overcome this by usHlg a smaller aliquot. This method Is also used to gel beyond tI .. quoted 1hreshold since sample$ containing high PI and Pd usually also contain high sulphides and some nk:kel.. Inler-element Interferences are controlled by uSIng a solution of CU and La In aU lamptos and standard soluUons.
1 Cameron Ave .• P.O. Box 10. Swastika, Ontario POK ITO Tele"hone (705)642-3244 Fax (705)642-3300
o o o o to ~
10
o o o to
~ I 10
592000
TRFS-OR RESOURCES L TO Kenny Twp Drill Access Map
594000 !J9bOOO
N ~ >en Z z UJ ~
~~-~en ~ . I , ,
~E S
, , I
I
I
I
• r , • , , , , , ,
, '410 _.-. ~
I / access trail ~ I' I ,.... ........... _ ...... _~ .. , I " ~ ~ I , ---~~ , ........ --t ,~016042
-.--Marian Lake
Chttstie Lake
, I , , , • ~ M07-01
.... _ ....,' ...,. TEM07 -02 Mud· Lake
1245205
, ,
, TEM07-03 \ ~ ,
I .. -..
1 0514 ,~ , I , ,
Conross L'ke . , • ,
, \ 50-;.;;;0~_~0 ~~~5~P_0 __ 1.000 Meters \ I:::
592000 594000 596 00
~ <D o o 8